Re: [python-committers] Proposing Mark Shannon to be a core developer
2018-05-14 16:41 GMT-04:00 Larry Hastings: > Dr. Mark Shannon contributed the "key sharing dictionary" to Python, writing > both the PEP and the implementation. This shipped in Python 3.3 and was > listed as one of the top features of that release as according to the > "What's New?" document. > > We've asked Mark in the past if he'd be interested in becoming a core > developer--and he actually said no. At the time he said he didn't like our > antiquated workflow. Now that we've switched to the git-based core dev > workflow, this objection is gone, and he's now interested in accepting the > commit bit and the responsibilities that it entails. > > I suspect you, my colleagues in CPython core development, will be surprised > at the current state of affairs. I'm expecting a load of "you mean Mark > *isn't* a core developer yet?" replies. Wait. Mark is already a core dev, right? I don't understand your email :-) +1, obvisouly. Victor ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
Re: [python-committers] AppVeyor and Travis-CI
On 5/14/2018 9:49 PM, Eric V. Smith wrote: I accidentally checked in some test files, and they got backported to 3.7. I pushed a commit to delete them, and it was committed to master. But in the 3.7 backport, something has gone wrong with AppVeyor and Travis-CI. https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/6844 AppVeyor says "Expected — Waiting for status to be reported". There's no obvious way to get it to actually report the status, or to restart. There is no "Details" button listed on the PR page. For Travis-CI, Miss Isslington sent me an email that says "Backport status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ ." The Travis-CI log file ends with a timeout: == FAIL: test_stdin_broken_pipe (test.test_asyncio.test_subprocess.SubprocessSafeWatcherTests) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/travis/build/python/cpython/Lib/test/test_asyncio/test_subprocess.py", line 214, in test_stdin_broken_pipe self.loop.run_until_complete, coro) AssertionError: (, 'ConnectionResetError'>) not raised by run_until_complete -- I'm sure this is all due to the heavy load the systems are under. I can't find a way to kick both of these off again. I couldn't find anything in the devguide, but if I missed it please let me know. I have triggered retesting by editing the blurb. It may be that touching by adding and deleting a space was enough, or maybe I had to actually change something. But retesting right now, with tests failing, is useless. I just submitting a trivial change and got the same unrelated failures for importlib, multiprocessing, and asyncio. Warning -- files was modified by test_importlib Before: [] After: ['core'] ERROR: test_ignore (test.test_multiprocessing_forkserver.TestIgnoreEINTR) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/travis/build/python/cpython/Lib/test/_test_multiprocessing.py", line 4359, in test_ignore os.kill(p.pid, signal.SIGUSR1) ProcessLookupError: [Errno 3] No such process -- Ran 310 tests in 93.862s FAILED (errors=1, skipped=27) test test_multiprocessing_forkserver failed and the same or similar multiple failures for asyncio Both our tests ended with FAILED (failures=2, skipped=14) test test_asyncio failed 2 tests failed again: test_asyncio test_multiprocessing_forkserver Total duration: 14 min 29 sec Tests result: FAILURE and we cannot merge. ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
[python-committers] AppVeyor and Travis-CI
I accidentally checked in some test files, and they got backported to 3.7. I pushed a commit to delete them, and it was committed to master. But in the 3.7 backport, something has gone wrong with AppVeyor and Travis-CI. https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/6844 AppVeyor says "Expected — Waiting for status to be reported". There's no obvious way to get it to actually report the status, or to restart. There is no "Details" button listed on the PR page. For Travis-CI, Miss Isslington sent me an email that says "Backport status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ ." The Travis-CI log file ends with a timeout: == FAIL: test_stdin_broken_pipe (test.test_asyncio.test_subprocess.SubprocessSafeWatcherTests) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/travis/build/python/cpython/Lib/test/test_asyncio/test_subprocess.py", line 214, in test_stdin_broken_pipe self.loop.run_until_complete, coro) AssertionError: (, 'ConnectionResetError'>) not raised by run_until_complete -- I'm sure this is all due to the heavy load the systems are under. I can't find a way to kick both of these off again. I couldn't find anything in the devguide, but if I missed it please let me know. Thanks. Eric ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
Re: [python-committers] Proposing Mark Shannon to be a core developer
On 2018-05-14 16:41, Larry Hastings wrote: > > > Dr. Mark Shannon contributed the "key sharing dictionary" to Python, > writing both the PEP and the implementation. This shipped in Python 3.3 > and was listed as one of the top features of that release as according > to the "What's New?" document. > > We've asked Mark in the past if he'd be interested in becoming a core > developer--and he actually said no. At the time he said he didn't like > our antiquated workflow. Now that we've switched to the git-based core > dev workflow, this objection is gone, and he's now interested in > accepting the commit bit and the responsibilities that it entails. > > I suspect you, my colleagues in CPython core development, will be > surprised at the current state of affairs. I'm expecting a load of "you > mean Mark *isn't* a core developer yet?" replies. > +1 ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
Re: [python-committers] Proposing Mark Shannon to be a core developer
+1 -- Best regards, Łukasz Langa > On May 14, 2018, at 4:41 PM, Larry Hastingswrote: > > > > Dr. Mark Shannon contributed the "key sharing dictionary" to Python, writing > both the PEP and the implementation. This shipped in Python 3.3 and was > listed as one of the top features of that release as according to the "What's > New?" document. > > We've asked Mark in the past if he'd be interested in becoming a core > developer--and he actually said no. At the time he said he didn't like our > antiquated workflow. Now that we've switched to the git-based core dev > workflow, this objection is gone, and he's now interested in accepting the > commit bit and the responsibilities that it entails. > > I suspect you, my colleagues in CPython core development, will be surprised > at the current state of affairs. I'm expecting a load of "you mean Mark > *isn't* a core developer yet?" replies. > > > Submitted for your consideration, > > > /arry > ___ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
Re: [python-committers] Proposing Mark Shannon to be a core developer
+1 Yury -- Yury ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
Re: [python-committers] Proposing Mark Shannon to be a core developer
+1 On Mon, May 14, 2018, 6:47 PM INADA Naokiwrote: > +1 > > 2018年5月15日(火) 6:55 Ivan Levkivskyi : > >> +1 >> >> Yes, I actually thought he is a core dev for ages :-) >> > > Me too. > > >> -- >> Ivan >> >> >> >> On 14 May 2018 at 17:42, Eric Snow wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> -eric >>> >>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Larry Hastings >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > Dr. Mark Shannon contributed the "key sharing dictionary" to Python, >>> writing >>> > both the PEP and the implementation. This shipped in Python 3.3 and >>> was >>> > listed as one of the top features of that release as according to the >>> > "What's New?" document. >>> > >>> > We've asked Mark in the past if he'd be interested in becoming a core >>> > developer--and he actually said no. At the time he said he didn't >>> like our >>> > antiquated workflow. Now that we've switched to the git-based core dev >>> > workflow, this objection is gone, and he's now interested in accepting >>> the >>> > commit bit and the responsibilities that it entails. >>> > >>> > I suspect you, my colleagues in CPython core development, will be >>> surprised >>> > at the current state of affairs. I'm expecting a load of "you mean >>> Mark >>> > *isn't* a core developer yet?" replies. >>> > >>> > >>> > Submitted for your consideration, >>> > >>> > >>> > /arry >>> > >>> > ___ >>> > python-committers mailing list >>> > python-committers@python.org >>> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers >>> > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >>> > >>> ___ >>> python-committers mailing list >>> python-committers@python.org >>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers >>> Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >>> >> >> ___ >> python-committers mailing list >> python-committers@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers >> Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >> > ___ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
Re: [python-committers] Proposing Mark Shannon to be a core developer
14.05.18 23:41, Larry Hastings пише: Dr. Mark Shannon contributed the "key sharing dictionary" to Python, writing both the PEP and the implementation. This shipped in Python 3.3 and was listed as one of the top features of that release as according to the "What's New?" document. We've asked Mark in the past if he'd be interested in becoming a core developer--and he actually said no. At the time he said he didn't like our antiquated workflow. Now that we've switched to the git-based core dev workflow, this objection is gone, and he's now interested in accepting the commit bit and the responsibilities that it entails. I suspect you, my colleagues in CPython core development, will be surprised at the current state of affairs. I'm expecting a load of "you mean Mark *isn't* a core developer yet?" replies. +1 from me. I always wondered why he is not a core developer. ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
Re: [python-committers] Proposing Mark Shannon to be a core developer
+1 2018年5月15日(火) 6:55 Ivan Levkivskyi: > +1 > > Yes, I actually thought he is a core dev for ages :-) > Me too. > -- > Ivan > > > > On 14 May 2018 at 17:42, Eric Snow wrote: > >> +1 >> >> -eric >> >> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Larry Hastings >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Dr. Mark Shannon contributed the "key sharing dictionary" to Python, >> writing >> > both the PEP and the implementation. This shipped in Python 3.3 and was >> > listed as one of the top features of that release as according to the >> > "What's New?" document. >> > >> > We've asked Mark in the past if he'd be interested in becoming a core >> > developer--and he actually said no. At the time he said he didn't like >> our >> > antiquated workflow. Now that we've switched to the git-based core dev >> > workflow, this objection is gone, and he's now interested in accepting >> the >> > commit bit and the responsibilities that it entails. >> > >> > I suspect you, my colleagues in CPython core development, will be >> surprised >> > at the current state of affairs. I'm expecting a load of "you mean Mark >> > *isn't* a core developer yet?" replies. >> > >> > >> > Submitted for your consideration, >> > >> > >> > /arry >> > >> > ___ >> > python-committers mailing list >> > python-committers@python.org >> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers >> > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >> > >> ___ >> python-committers mailing list >> python-committers@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers >> Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >> > > ___ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
Re: [python-committers] Proposing Mark Shannon to be a core developer
+1 from me :-) On 14 May 2018 at 21:41, Larry Hastingswrote: > > > Dr. Mark Shannon contributed the "key sharing dictionary" to Python, writing > both the PEP and the implementation. This shipped in Python 3.3 and was > listed as one of the top features of that release as according to the > "What's New?" document. > > We've asked Mark in the past if he'd be interested in becoming a core > developer--and he actually said no. At the time he said he didn't like our > antiquated workflow. Now that we've switched to the git-based core dev > workflow, this objection is gone, and he's now interested in accepting the > commit bit and the responsibilities that it entails. > > I suspect you, my colleagues in CPython core development, will be surprised > at the current state of affairs. I'm expecting a load of "you mean Mark > *isn't* a core developer yet?" replies. > > > Submitted for your consideration, > > > /arry > > ___ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
Re: [python-committers] Proposing Mark Shannon to be a core developer
+1 On Mon, May 14, 2018, at 4:41 PM, Larry Hastings wrote: > > > Dr. Mark Shannon contributed the "key sharing dictionary" to Python, > writing both the PEP and the implementation. This shipped in Python 3.3 > and was listed as one of the top features of that release as according > to the "What's New?" document. > > We've asked Mark in the past if he'd be interested in becoming a core > developer--and he actually said no. At the time he said he didn't like > our antiquated workflow. Now that we've switched to the git-based core > dev workflow, this objection is gone, and he's now interested in > accepting the commit bit and the responsibilities that it entails. > > I suspect you, my colleagues in CPython core development, will be > surprised at the current state of affairs. I'm expecting a load of "you > mean Mark *isn't* a core developer yet?" replies. > > > Submitted for your consideration, > > > //arry/ > ___ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
Re: [python-committers] Proposing Mark Shannon to be a core developer
+1 Yes, I actually thought he is a core dev for ages :-) -- Ivan On 14 May 2018 at 17:42, Eric Snowwrote: > +1 > > -eric > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Larry Hastings > wrote: > > > > > > Dr. Mark Shannon contributed the "key sharing dictionary" to Python, > writing > > both the PEP and the implementation. This shipped in Python 3.3 and was > > listed as one of the top features of that release as according to the > > "What's New?" document. > > > > We've asked Mark in the past if he'd be interested in becoming a core > > developer--and he actually said no. At the time he said he didn't like > our > > antiquated workflow. Now that we've switched to the git-based core dev > > workflow, this objection is gone, and he's now interested in accepting > the > > commit bit and the responsibilities that it entails. > > > > I suspect you, my colleagues in CPython core development, will be > surprised > > at the current state of affairs. I'm expecting a load of "you mean Mark > > *isn't* a core developer yet?" replies. > > > > > > Submitted for your consideration, > > > > > > /arry > > > > ___ > > python-committers mailing list > > python-committers@python.org > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > > > ___ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
Re: [python-committers] Proposing Mark Shannon to be a core developer
+1 -eric On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Larry Hastingswrote: > > > Dr. Mark Shannon contributed the "key sharing dictionary" to Python, writing > both the PEP and the implementation. This shipped in Python 3.3 and was > listed as one of the top features of that release as according to the > "What's New?" document. > > We've asked Mark in the past if he'd be interested in becoming a core > developer--and he actually said no. At the time he said he didn't like our > antiquated workflow. Now that we've switched to the git-based core dev > workflow, this objection is gone, and he's now interested in accepting the > commit bit and the responsibilities that it entails. > > I suspect you, my colleagues in CPython core development, will be surprised > at the current state of affairs. I'm expecting a load of "you mean Mark > *isn't* a core developer yet?" replies. > > > Submitted for your consideration, > > > /arry > > ___ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
Re: [python-committers] Proposing Mark Shannon to be a core developer
On 05/14/2018 01:41 PM, Larry Hastings wrote: Dr. Mark Shannon contributed the "key sharing dictionary" to Python, writing both the PEP and the implementation. This shipped in Python 3.3 and was listed as one of the top features of that release as according to the "What's New?" document. We've asked Mark in the past if he'd be interested in becoming a core developer--and he actually said no. At the time he said he didn't like our antiquated workflow. Now that we've switched to the git-based core dev workflow, this objection is gone, and he's now interested in accepting the commit bit and the responsibilities that it entails. +1 -- ~Ethan~ ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
Re: [python-committers] Proposing Mark Shannon to be a core developer
+1 ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
[python-committers] Proposing Mark Shannon to be a core developer
Dr. Mark Shannon contributed the "key sharing dictionary" to Python, writing both the PEP and the implementation. This shipped in Python 3.3 and was listed as one of the top features of that release as according to the "What's New?" document. We've asked Mark in the past if he'd be interested in becoming a core developer--and he actually said no. At the time he said he didn't like our antiquated workflow. Now that we've switched to the git-based core dev workflow, this objection is gone, and he's now interested in accepting the commit bit and the responsibilities that it entails. I suspect you, my colleagues in CPython core development, will be surprised at the current state of affairs. I'm expecting a load of "you mean Mark *isn't* a core developer yet?" replies. Submitted for your consideration, //arry/ ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
Re: [python-committers] Orphaned backports
On Mon, 14 May 2018 at 14:22 Mariatta Wijayawrote: > To help with this, miss-islington will now assign the PR where backport > had failed to the core dev who merged the original PR. > Great feature! -Brett > > > Mariatta > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 at 02:59 Serhiy Storchaka >> wrote: >> >>> 23.04.18 19:47, Brett Cannon пише: >>> >>> On Sun, 22 Apr 2018 at 11:27 Terry Reedy wrote: >>> Does github allow repository owners to send email directly to people who have submitted PRs or at least, people with commit privileges (in this case, those whose have done particular merges)? >>> >>> No. People have to provide explicit permission to expose their email >>> address. Otherwise the best we have are @ mentions in a comment. >>> >>> >>> Aren't all active committer subscribed to this mailing list? >>> >> >> They should be. Doesn't mean they pay attention to it. ;) >> >> -Brett >> >> >> ___ >> python-committers mailing list >> python-committers@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers >> Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >> >> > ᐧ > ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
Re: [python-committers] Orphaned backports
To help with this, miss-islington will now assign the PR where backport had failed to the core dev who merged the original PR. Mariatta On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Brett Cannonwrote: > > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 at 02:59 Serhiy Storchaka wrote: > >> 23.04.18 19:47, Brett Cannon пише: >> >> On Sun, 22 Apr 2018 at 11:27 Terry Reedy wrote: >> >>> Does github allow repository owners to send email directly to people who >>> have submitted PRs or at least, people with commit privileges (in this >>> case, those whose have done particular merges)? >>> >> >> No. People have to provide explicit permission to expose their email >> address. Otherwise the best we have are @ mentions in a comment. >> >> >> Aren't all active committer subscribed to this mailing list? >> > > They should be. Doesn't mean they pay attention to it. ;) > > -Brett > > > ___ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > > ᐧ ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/