Core vote [Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing]
core +1 on releasing it into the wild grisha On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote: Test results so far, FYI. How long shall we wait until we kick it up to the next level? - jim +1 FreeBSD 6.1, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3,1 +1 Linux Debian 3.1 Sarge, Apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.3.5 +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.5 +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 (i386), Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3 +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 i386, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3 +1 Linux Fedora Core 6, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 i386, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 x86_64, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1 +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.0.6, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3 +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.10, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4c1 +1 Mac OS X (Darwin 8.8.1), Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.2 +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.2.1 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS Supplied Version) +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS Supplied Version) +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5 +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4 +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5 +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
Re: Core vote [Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing]
+1 for me too ! Nicolas 2006/12/12, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: core +1 on releasing it into the wild grisha On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote: Test results so far, FYI. How long shall we wait until we kick it up to the next level? - jim +1 FreeBSD 6.1, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3,1 +1 Linux Debian 3.1 Sarge, Apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.3.5 +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.5 +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 (i386), Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3 +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 i386, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3 +1 Linux Fedora Core 6, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 i386, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 x86_64, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1 +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.0.6, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3 +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.10, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4c1 +1 Mac OS X (Darwin 8.8.1), Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.2 +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.2.1 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS Supplied Version) +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS Supplied Version) +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5 +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4 +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5 +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
Re: Core vote [Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing]
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: core +1 on releasing it into the wild grisha I'm not sure what we're voting on here, and I'm not sure what I meant by the next level either. :) Is this a vote to give 3.3.0 beta a wider release (apache mirrors and so on), or a vote to go right to the 3.3.0 final release? I'm +1 either way. As I recall we didn't get much additional testing as a result of uploading the betas to the apache mirrors in the past. The people most likely to chip in with testing are already here on python-dev. Having the 3.2.x stable branch certainly facilitated releasing quick fixes for 3.2. There is no reason why we can't do the same with 3.3, so my inclination is to do an official 3.3.0 final release now rather than later. Jim On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote: Test results so far, FYI. How long shall we wait until we kick it up to the next level? - jim +1 FreeBSD 6.1, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3,1 +1 Linux Debian 3.1 Sarge, Apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.3.5 +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.5 +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 (i386), Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3 +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 i386, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3 +1 Linux Fedora Core 6, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 i386, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 x86_64, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1 +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.0.6, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3 +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.10, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4c1 +1 Mac OS X (Darwin 8.8.1), Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.2 +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.2.1 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS Supplied Version) +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS Supplied Version) +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5 +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4 +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5 +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
Re: Core vote [Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing]
Jim Gallacher wrote .. Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: core +1 on releasing it into the wild grisha I'm not sure what we're voting on here, and I'm not sure what I meant by the next level either. :) I'd have to concur, that not specific about what is intended. Is this a vote to give 3.3.0 beta a wider release (apache mirrors and so on), or a vote to go right to the 3.3.0 final release? Or should that actually be 3.3.1 so that there is no confusion resulting from both a 3.0.0b and 3.0.0 floating around. The tags directory in svn suggests that even if nothing changed, it was always incremented up a version when dropping the beta designation. That all said, I'd be +1 on going to official (non beta) release as 3.3.1. I'm +1 either way. As I recall we didn't get much additional testing as a result of uploading the betas to the apache mirrors in the past. The people most likely to chip in with testing are already here on python-dev. I would have liked to get around to doing test on OpenVPS setup, but have not had the time. I also never like that we never see anyone test on Solaris. :-( Having the 3.2.x stable branch certainly facilitated releasing quick fixes for 3.2. There is no reason why we can't do the same with 3.3, so my inclination is to do an official 3.3.0 final release now rather than later. Jim On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote: Test results so far, FYI. How long shall we wait until we kick it up to the next level? - jim +1 FreeBSD 6.1, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3,1 +1 Linux Debian 3.1 Sarge, Apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.3.5 +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.5 +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 (i386), Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3 +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 i386, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3 +1 Linux Fedora Core 6, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 i386, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 x86_64, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1 +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.0.6, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3 +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.10, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4c1 +1 Mac OS X (Darwin 8.8.1), Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.2 +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.2.1 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS Supplied Version) +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS Supplied Version) +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5 +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4 +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5 +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
Re: Core vote [Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing]
Graham Dumpleton wrote: Jim Gallacher wrote .. Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: core +1 on releasing it into the wild grisha I'm not sure what we're voting on here, and I'm not sure what I meant by the next level either. :) I'd have to concur, that not specific about what is intended. Is this a vote to give 3.3.0 beta a wider release (apache mirrors and so on), or a vote to go right to the 3.3.0 final release? Or should that actually be 3.3.1 so that there is no confusion resulting from both a 3.0.0b and 3.0.0 floating around. The tags directory in svn suggests that even if nothing changed, it was always incremented up a version when dropping the beta designation. That all said, I'd be +1 on going to official (non beta) release as 3.3.1. +1 for 3.3.1 release I'm +1 either way. As I recall we didn't get much additional testing as a result of uploading the betas to the apache mirrors in the past. The people most likely to chip in with testing are already here on python-dev. I would have liked to get around to doing test on OpenVPS setup, but have not had the time. I also never like that we never see anyone test on Solaris. :-( Maybe mod_python just isn't all that popular on Solaris? Jim
Re: Core vote [Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing]
I'm not core but I think its good practice to officially release this as a beta to the wider community before making it an actual release. I didn't test it because I was waiting for the core vote :-) David Jim Gallacher wrote: Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: core +1 on releasing it into the wild grisha I'm not sure what we're voting on here, and I'm not sure what I meant by the next level either. :) Is this a vote to give 3.3.0 beta a wider release (apache mirrors and so on), or a vote to go right to the 3.3.0 final release? I'm +1 either way. As I recall we didn't get much additional testing as a result of uploading the betas to the apache mirrors in the past. The people most likely to chip in with testing are already here on python-dev. Having the 3.2.x stable branch certainly facilitated releasing quick fixes for 3.2. There is no reason why we can't do the same with 3.3, so my inclination is to do an official 3.3.0 final release now rather than later. Jim On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote: Test results so far, FYI. How long shall we wait until we kick it up to the next level? - jim +1 FreeBSD 6.1, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3,1 +1 Linux Debian 3.1 Sarge, Apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.3.5 +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.5 +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 (i386), Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3 +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 i386, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3 +1 Linux Fedora Core 6, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 i386, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 x86_64, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4 +1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1 +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.0.6, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3 +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.10, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4c1 +1 Mac OS X (Darwin 8.8.1), Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.2 +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.2.1 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS Supplied Version) +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS Supplied Version) +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5 +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4 +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5 +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
