Re: 4.1. Regressions
Here is the analysis of possible cases for bugs in query [1], together with the proposed instructions to review them, any comments and suggestions, please let me know. 1. New issue happens on new feature in 4.1, or migration issue only applies to 4.1(e.g. *Issue 124437*https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124437- Opening password protected files not possible) - Leave the Version field to 4.1 2. New found issue being observed in 4.1 - Determine and refine the Version field to version in which the issue occurs first 3. Regression issue works in 4.0.1 but breaks in 4.1 - Leave the Version field to 4.1 and set the Keywords field to regression, then specify the comparison build and regression build clearly in Additional *C*omments field Here, let's call for volunteers to assist: 1. Any one who can help on this, please send me your Bugzilla ID, I will send you bug list for your review 2. Any one who has already started reviewing, could you please share and book your bug IDs to avoid duplicated effort among us. Hyperlinks: [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=130944namedcmd=410_RegressionTestremaction=runsharer_id=8583 (shared with canconfirm) On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote: On 3/11/14 6:33 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Hi, I think Bugzilla Help https://issues.apache.org/ooo/describekeywords.cgi tells it all. There only is no common sense whether key word should be used also for very old regressions (regression in OOo 1.0.1 compared to OOo 1.0.0), from developer's point of view only regressions in AOO 3.4-dev and later are of interest. https://www.mail-archive.com/qa@openoffice.apache.org/msg01787.html Generally problems with newly integrated features can not be regressions. But if the code of a newly integrated feature damages an older function so that it does not work correctly since integration, that damage deserves key word regression. But I do not think that many regression key words will have to be added. The problem with the Bugs in the list is that at least one of following mistakes is in data for the Bugs: * Version has been changed to 4.1 in error, example: (Bug 105492 - Text Orientation Degrees Entry Field * It has not been tested with what Version the bug has appeared, example: (Bug 124259 - mathvariant=normal is ignored on import of .mml file) So far my personal thoughts, what are result of long co-working in open source projects, communication is the key here. We have experienced QA volunteers who know how to set the fields and we have volunteers with less experience. I suggest that we clean up the various fields and update the how submit a bug page with a clear and updated explanation of what we think is best. If somebody is not sure it is best to let the fields unset or open and ask on the QA list for support/help. Juergen CU Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: 4.1. Regressions
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Rainer Bielefeld rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote: Yuzhen Fan schrieb: Here is the analysis of possible cases Hi, plausible description of the task, I'm more or less proceeding so. I will send you bug list for your review Difficult - I currently prefer to check issues where I have knowledge first, not to proceed a list. Other volunteers might think similar. If you agree we can use my https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype= runnamedlist_id=133742namedcmd=410_RegressionTest (or something similar?) for a while, I can add Exclude issue numbers what have been checked and are no regressions after short mail here, rest fall out of the list one by one because they got keyword regression or more early version number or whatever. Hi, I cannot open your query above, it returns red warning, have you shared it? Nevertheless, we should find proceedings what can increase efficiency by avoiding double work. May be some volunteers add themselves to QA Contact in bugs where they have skills and want to proceed them within a week or so? Sounds good, but how about the defects already have value in QA Contact (although I do not find one so far)? CU Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Bug Wrangler Heroes
Hi, On 18.03.2014 16:26, Rob Weir wrote: On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Rainer Bielefeld rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote: Hi all, May be you are interested to know how who are the most active bug wranglers in Bugzilla? Because my scripting skills are not very good I used AOO Calc to find out with following steps (something quick and dirty): We should think of what stats we want. I can help with scripting it in Python. 1) Maybe a monthly summary, count of new bugs, closed bugs, etc., categorized by product. Also total comments, count of volunteers contributing. 2) Highlight the bugs with most activity that month 3) Volunteers with most new bug reports 4) Volunteers with most comments/activity 0 Downloadedhttps://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-issues/201402.mbox 1 Copied to a .csv 2 opened document in AOO Calc 3 Filtered for --- Comment # to find comment headings 4 Copied visible rows to new sheet 5 Deleted all until From: Regular expressions find .*from and replace with nothing 6 Delete anything behind name: Regular expressions find .* and replace with nothing 7 Copy to new table and sort 8 Filter for not empty – no duplicates 9 Behind every visible contents =COUNTIF(A$1:A$3000;A1) (Example for row 1)counts number of duplicates 10 Copy to empty text documents and replace tabulators by blanks for posting here The result (only contributors with more than 3 comments) for February 2014: Comments / Name --- 824 Edwin Sharp 294 Rainer Bielefeld 174 Armin Le Grand 142 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 126 SVN Robot 089 Andre 051 hanya 041 h...@apache.org 041 j...@apache.org --- 035 Marcus 035 Regina Henschel 034 Ariel Constenla-Haile 025 j.nitsc...@ok.de --- 023 zhaoshzh 022 Sam Jennings 018 V Stuart Foote 017 fanyuz...@gmail.com --- 016 Andrea Pescetti 016 Thorsten Wagner 015 brinzing 014 liuping 013 Clarence GUO 012 jolatt 012 Rob Weir 011 aterb...@progressive.com --- 011 Yuri Dario 010 bmarcelly 010 kurt.pfei...@gmail.com --- 009 Kevin Chilton 009 lauhub 009 r...@apache.org --- 007 gvalla...@gmail.com --- 007 oooforum 007 Raphael Bircher 007 richlv 007 snoff 006 Apostolos Syropoulos 006 behnoosh 006 hhu...@gmail.com --- 006 jmpoo 006 John 006 Shenfeng Liu 006 slacka 005 Aivaras Stepukonis 005 Andreas S=C3=A4ger 005 annette_ciancibe...@progressive.com --- 005 beckyfiedler 005 digulla 005 ella_no...@progressive.com --- 005 Jon Peli Oleaga 005 JP CASSOU 004 Akriti 004 bnjroo 004 hbie...@gmail.com --- 004 Kay 004 Kim Tidwell 004 laura h 004 Oukcha 004 schlocke 004 SharPorz 004 Sreedevi 004 sworddragon 004 trebly 004 veathako Some more statistics for February: - 2513 Comments 180 Commenters I'm getting different results, though using a Python script, perhaps with different assumptions. I took all the posts from the February mbox for iss...@openoffice.apache.org. I rejected ones that were release blocker processing issues, the ones starting with review or 4.1.0_release_blocker in the subject. For the remaining I looked at the X-Bugzilla-Who header to get the name of the person who changed the BZ issue. This gives me 3295 changes, from 228 people, more than what you have. My top 10 list is: el...@apache.org: 1020 rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de: 406 o...@apache.org: 212 armin.le.gr...@me.com: 175 svn...@dev.null.org: 126 awf@googlemail.com: 108 mar...@apache.org: 90 h...@apache.org: 79 j...@apache.org: 62 hanya.r...@gmail.com: 51 Maybe I'm counting more than comments and new issue reports? What changes do not require a comment? Changing the priority of an issue, for example? Often, I add myself to or remove myself from CC without any comment. For my review of issues fixed for AOO 4.1.0 I also just changed the Target Milestone field. Just my observations. Best regards, Oliver. Regards, -Rob Problems: New reports are not in the statistics, not a real problem, but my time was too limited. Hope I did not integrate too many fallacies into my calculations ;-) Best regards Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
AOO 4.1 Beta Survey
I've put up a short survey related to the AOO 4.1 Beta. If you have installed 4.1 Beta, and can spare a few minutes, please fill out the survey. This will give us some important information on what configurations received a lot of exposure in the Beta and which parts did not. http://survey.openoffice.org/index.php/732688/ -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Newcomer
Hi Аll. My name is Yulia. I am from Odessa, Ukraine. My education is bachelor of Computer Science direction Automation and Control. Now, I want to be Quality Assurance Engineer. I hope to get here practical knowledge to become a professional in the future. Operation systems: Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3 and Linux Mint Bugzilla account - pan.abn...@gmail.com Testlink account - Abnora Please, assign some tasks to me. Thank you in advance.
Re: Bug Wrangler Heroes
I'm getting different results, Hi, I counted the --- Comment # lines in the .mbox, what of course will not count simple Add to cc or similar. CU Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Bug Wrangler Heroes
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, On 18.03.2014 16:26, Rob Weir wrote: On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Rainer Bielefeld rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote: Hi all, May be you are interested to know how who are the most active bug wranglers in Bugzilla? Because my scripting skills are not very good I used AOO Calc to find out with following steps (something quick and dirty): We should think of what stats we want. I can help with scripting it in Python. 1) Maybe a monthly summary, count of new bugs, closed bugs, etc., categorized by product. Also total comments, count of volunteers contributing. 2) Highlight the bugs with most activity that month 3) Volunteers with most new bug reports 4) Volunteers with most comments/activity 0 Downloadedhttps://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-issues/201402.mbox 1 Copied to a .csv 2 opened document in AOO Calc 3 Filtered for --- Comment # to find comment headings 4 Copied visible rows to new sheet 5 Deleted all until From: Regular expressions find .*from and replace with nothing 6 Delete anything behind name: Regular expressions find .* and replace with nothing 7 Copy to new table and sort 8 Filter for not empty – no duplicates 9 Behind every visible contents =COUNTIF(A$1:A$3000;A1) (Example for row 1)counts number of duplicates 10 Copy to empty text documents and replace tabulators by blanks for posting here The result (only contributors with more than 3 comments) for February 2014: Comments / Name --- 824 Edwin Sharp 294 Rainer Bielefeld 174 Armin Le Grand 142 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 126 SVN Robot 089 Andre 051 hanya 041 h...@apache.org 041 j...@apache.org --- 035 Marcus 035 Regina Henschel 034 Ariel Constenla-Haile 025 j.nitsc...@ok.de --- 023 zhaoshzh 022 Sam Jennings 018 V Stuart Foote 017 fanyuz...@gmail.com --- 016 Andrea Pescetti 016 Thorsten Wagner 015 brinzing 014 liuping 013 Clarence GUO 012 jolatt 012 Rob Weir 011 aterb...@progressive.com --- 011 Yuri Dario 010 bmarcelly 010 kurt.pfei...@gmail.com --- 009 Kevin Chilton 009 lauhub 009 r...@apache.org --- 007 gvalla...@gmail.com --- 007 oooforum 007 Raphael Bircher 007 richlv 007 snoff 006 Apostolos Syropoulos 006 behnoosh 006 hhu...@gmail.com --- 006 jmpoo 006 John 006 Shenfeng Liu 006 slacka 005 Aivaras Stepukonis 005 Andreas S=C3=A4ger 005 annette_ciancibe...@progressive.com --- 005 beckyfiedler 005 digulla 005 ella_no...@progressive.com --- 005 Jon Peli Oleaga 005 JP CASSOU 004 Akriti 004 bnjroo 004 hbie...@gmail.com --- 004 Kay 004 Kim Tidwell 004 laura h 004 Oukcha 004 schlocke 004 SharPorz 004 Sreedevi 004 sworddragon 004 trebly 004 veathako Some more statistics for February: - 2513 Comments 180 Commenters I'm getting different results, though using a Python script, perhaps with different assumptions. I took all the posts from the February mbox for iss...@openoffice.apache.org. I rejected ones that were release blocker processing issues, the ones starting with review or 4.1.0_release_blocker in the subject. For the remaining I looked at the X-Bugzilla-Who header to get the name of the person who changed the BZ issue. This gives me 3295 changes, from 228 people, more than what you have. My top 10 list is: el...@apache.org: 1020 rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de: 406 o...@apache.org: 212 armin.le.gr...@me.com: 175 svn...@dev.null.org: 126 awf@googlemail.com: 108 mar...@apache.org: 90 h...@apache.org: 79 j...@apache.org: 62 hanya.r...@gmail.com: 51 Maybe I'm counting more than comments and new issue reports? What changes do not require a comment? Changing the priority of an issue, for example? Often, I add myself to or remove myself from CC without any comment. For my review of issues fixed for AOO 4.1.0 I also just changed the Target Milestone field. That must be it. If I filter my results to show only those who entered a comment then my script matches Rainer's results. Well, almost. I'm off by 1 on the commenter count. For February I see: 99 people submitted 181 new bugs 181 people contributed 2513 comments Regards, -Rob Just my observations. Best regards, Oliver. Regards, -Rob Problems: New reports are not in the statistics, not a real problem, but my time was too limited. Hope I did not integrate too many fallacies into my calculations ;-) Best regards Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
