Re: [Call For QAVOLUNTEER] AOO 3.5 milestone regression test(wasRe: SVT report of AOO build r1400866(3.5 snapshot))
I added my name to the comment section of bug ID 121403. I can test on Win7 or MacOSX. From your experience I think you will have an idea of where the most volunteers will want to test, so you can give me the 10 test cases on the other platform for the best distribution of manpower. On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Ji Yan yanji...@gmail.com wrote: There is only one milestone build which is AOO 3.5. So I think what QA volunteers can do is testing this milestone build. Once we start 4.0 feature developing, QA team will follow test plan to do relative test. On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Ji Yan yanji...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, AOO 3.5 milestone build is ready for awhile and now we have more QA volunteer joined. It's time to form a regression test to ensure this milestone build quality. The most-recent discussions on Dev list talk about 4.0 being the next major release, not 3.4. I assume your task will be the same either way, yes? We still need a regression test suite. -Rob I created a QA task [1] for test plan preparing in TestLink and another task[2] for regression test execution. I'm volunteer to take the first task[1]. Once the test plan ready, I'll let you know. If any volunteers wants help on this regression execution, please add comments to task[2]. We need 10 volunteers for cases execution, everyone need to complete 10 cases. [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121402 [2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121403 On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Ji Yan yanji...@gmail.com wrote: Li Feng, Thanks for your SVT report. According to your test result. I think we can close following memory leak defects[1]. If no objection, I'll close them. [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_id=120073%2C120050%2C120019%2C119997%2C120074%2C120021%2C120108%2C119992%2C120105%2C120079%2C120675%2C120040%2C116448%2C120106%2C113606%2C120028%2C120098%2C120038%2C120072%2C120077%2C119991list_id=38828 On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Li Feng Wang phoenix.wan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, all Last week, I run SVT cases on Windows 7 64bit with AOO3.5 r1400866（r1400866 is the first dev snapshot build on AOO3.5) Build: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds SVT introduction and scenario description: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/SVT 100 iterations, 41 Scenarios, run 24hours. SVT Report on r1400866: There is no obvious upgrade and downgrade compare with r1397404. Just one problem still exist https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121401. Report detail: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/SVTReport/r1400866VSr1397404 ps: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/SVTReport is the link to collect all SVT report. Welcome comments! -- Best Wishes, LiFeng Wang -- Thanks Best Regards, Yan Ji -- Thanks Best Regards, Yan Ji -- Thanks Best Regards, Yan Ji
Re: Not sure if I fully understand your intention...
Please select Apache OpenOffice testproject at top right corner after login. I totally missed that select yesterday evening. When I switch to the other test project I get a whole different story. :) Thanks for the quick reply. I also couldn't find any setting to specify the preferred OS, but I'll figure it out. I have access to the 3 major OS's so I'm sure I can work on most test cases. Best regards and thanks again! On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Ji Yan yanji...@gmail.com wrote: I think so, but didn't find where the setting is. I'll try to figure it out. On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Rob Weir rabas...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 21, 2012, at 8:45 PM, Ji Yan yanji...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Georges, There are two projects in Testlink system, what you are seeing Apache OpenOffice testproject2 is created by other admin guy which is for test purpose only. There is no useful test case in it, you can ignore it. Please select Apache OpenOffice testproject at top right corner after login. That project stored all the test cases, and once select Test Executions you will find the test plan Practical Test Cycle. When running test cases, you can filter platform in Setting section, e.g. if you have MacBook/iMac, you can select Mac OS, so the result input is for the MacOS, and other can select different platform to input their test result. Can this be done with the default permission (guest)? Enjoy your work in TestLink. On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Georges Bolssens marvel...@gmail.com wrote: In Bugzilla I reviewed the bug with ID 121376. The description states: In Testlink system http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.phpyou can find a test plan Practical Test Cycle is created for test purpose. When I follow the link I get a test case called AOOTest2-1:Starting AOO on a Mac , not the Practical test cycle that the bugzilla record mentions. Am I missing or overlooking something? I could do the test if required because I can get access to a Mac, but I can imagine lots of volunteers use another OS; what do they do ? Best regards,Georges -- Thanks Best Regards, Yan Ji -- Thanks Best Regards, Yan Ji
Re: Could anybody who has MS word 97 help to verify bug 35763?
Hi Lou, I might be able to recover an old installation CD of office 97 (dutch localized version) at work, though I won't be able to get my hands on it for another 2 weeks. How urgent is this? Also: Is there a specific windows version you want to test it on, or is that not important? On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 3:25 AM, lou ql louqin...@gmail.com wrote: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=35763 It's about the import/export of underling color, I have verified with MS word 2003, but I don't have MS word 97, could anybody help with this? Thanks. -- Regards, Lou QingLe
trying out testlink system. What to do when you find something else wrong than what the test is aimed at?
Hi, I was fiddling around with the Testlink system and started testing on AOOTest100 : Table Cell Protect. When I protect a cell and try to *type* something into it, I get a dialog that tells me that I can't because of the protection. However, when I try to *paste* something in there, there's no dialog with an error. I realize that this wasn't what the test was about, but nevertheless I think it would be better to trigger the dialog when pasting text also. How do I address this? Is this simply not my call to make and do I run the test as intended, or do I propose this change to the dev-list?
