Re: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure

[Adam Williamson]

On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 06:26 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> We can't do that easily in Pagure. We could use a different
> namespace, but namespaces are not browseable (at least not yet; only
> user groups are browseable which is a different thing).

Send patches ;)

I've had quite a few patches merged into Pagure, it's a pretty easy
code base to work with and pingou is very responsive. I've actually
been meaning to do something for this, since I'd like to be able to
browse the fedora-qa namespace. Didn't get the roundtuits yet, though.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure

[Josef Skladanka]

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Adam Williamson  wrote:

> On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 14:16 +0100, Josef Skladanka wrote:
> > > I am personaly against issues/pull requests on Pagure - logging into
> Phab
> > is about as difficult as logging into Pagure, and I don't see the benefit
> > of "allowing people to do it, since it's possible" even balancing out the
> > problem of split environments.
> > But that's just me.
>
> The difficult thing with Phab isn't logging into it (any more), it's
> setting up the entire arcanist workflow you need to be able to submit
> diffs. People aren't going to do that for drive-bys
>

And the thing is - they do not need to setup arcanist and all that:
https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/differential/diff/create/
This is as simple as it gets - paste raw diff, or upload a file. This will
just create a new differential revision, no fuss.
While it's not github-ish, it is easy, and just works - what's the problem?

j.
___
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure

[Kamil Paral]

> This came up in the qadevel meeting today and I wanted to put a bit
> more detail out.
> 
> Bitbucket was never intended to be the long-term home for our git
> projects - I think we're about the only folks in Fedora using it and
> it's not free software. As fedorahosted is closed down, we need to find
> a new home for blockerbugs but I figure that now is as good of a time
> as any to get all of our git projects in the same place.
> 
> I'm proposing the following moves:
> 
> * Move all Taskotron projects to pagure.io using the taskotron group:
>- pagure.io/taskotron/libtaskotron
>- pagure.io/taskotron/resultsdb
>- etc.
> 
> * Move blockerbugs under the existing fedora-qa namespace in pagure:
>- pagure.io/fedora-qa/blockerbugs
> 
> I'm not sure if there are any plans for the openqa stuff that currently
> lives on bitbucket but it'd be nice to see that moved as well.
> 
> Any objections, comments, concerns?

 (thumbs up)
___
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure

[Adam Williamson]

On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 11:13 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:21:16 -0700
> Tim Flink  wrote:
> 
> > This came up in the qadevel meeting today and I wanted to put a bit
> > more detail out.
> > 
> > Bitbucket was never intended to be the long-term home for our git
> > projects - I think we're about the only folks in Fedora using it and
> > it's not free software. As fedorahosted is closed down, we need to
> > find a new home for blockerbugs but I figure that now is as good of a
> > time as any to get all of our git projects in the same place.
> > 
> > I'm proposing the following moves:
> > 
> > * Move all Taskotron projects to pagure.io using the taskotron group:
> >- pagure.io/taskotron/libtaskotron
> >- pagure.io/taskotron/resultsdb
> >- etc.
> > 
> > * Move blockerbugs under the existing fedora-qa namespace in pagure:
> >- pagure.io/fedora-qa/blockerbugs
> > 
> > I'm not sure if there are any plans for the openqa stuff that
> > currently lives on bitbucket but it'd be nice to see that moved as
> > well.
> > 
> > Any objections, comments, concerns?
> 
> To be a bit more explicit, I'm planning to do these migrations tomorrow
> unless there are objections.

Sounds good to me. BTW, one small gotcha in case you don't know about
it - the pagure namespaces and groups aren't actually associated /
related. Putting a project under the fedora-qa namespace doesn't give
fedora-qa members commit access to it; you have to do that separately
(in the project settings).

I'll try and move the openqa repos this week, I guess.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure

[Tim Flink]

On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:21:16 -0700
Tim Flink  wrote:

> This came up in the qadevel meeting today and I wanted to put a bit
> more detail out.
> 
> Bitbucket was never intended to be the long-term home for our git
> projects - I think we're about the only folks in Fedora using it and
> it's not free software. As fedorahosted is closed down, we need to
> find a new home for blockerbugs but I figure that now is as good of a
> time as any to get all of our git projects in the same place.
> 
> I'm proposing the following moves:
> 
> * Move all Taskotron projects to pagure.io using the taskotron group:
>- pagure.io/taskotron/libtaskotron
>- pagure.io/taskotron/resultsdb
>- etc.
> 
> * Move blockerbugs under the existing fedora-qa namespace in pagure:
>- pagure.io/fedora-qa/blockerbugs
> 
> I'm not sure if there are any plans for the openqa stuff that
> currently lives on bitbucket but it'd be nice to see that moved as
> well.
> 
> Any objections, comments, concerns?

To be a bit more explicit, I'm planning to do these migrations tomorrow
unless there are objections.

Tim


pgpfycwF6n0kg.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure

[Harold Dost]

I would second that.


Harold Dost | @hdost


On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Martin Krizek  wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Tim Flink" 
>> To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 5:21:16 PM
>> Subject: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure
>>
>> This came up in the qadevel meeting today and I wanted to put a bit
>> more detail out.
>>
>> Bitbucket was never intended to be the long-term home for our git
>> projects - I think we're about the only folks in Fedora using it and
>> it's not free software. As fedorahosted is closed down, we need to find
>> a new home for blockerbugs but I figure that now is as good of a time
>> as any to get all of our git projects in the same place.
>>
>> I'm proposing the following moves:
>>
>> * Move all Taskotron projects to pagure.io using the taskotron group:
>>- pagure.io/taskotron/libtaskotron
>>- pagure.io/taskotron/resultsdb
>>- etc.
>>
>> * Move blockerbugs under the existing fedora-qa namespace in pagure:
>>- pagure.io/fedora-qa/blockerbugs
>>
>> I'm not sure if there are any plans for the openqa stuff that currently
>> lives on bitbucket but it'd be nice to see that moved as well.
>>
>> Any objections, comments, concerns?
>>
>
> Sounds good to me.
>
> Martin
> ___
> qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure

[Martin Krizek]

- Original Message -
> From: "Tim Flink" 
> To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 5:21:16 PM
> Subject: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure
> 
> This came up in the qadevel meeting today and I wanted to put a bit
> more detail out.
> 
> Bitbucket was never intended to be the long-term home for our git
> projects - I think we're about the only folks in Fedora using it and
> it's not free software. As fedorahosted is closed down, we need to find
> a new home for blockerbugs but I figure that now is as good of a time
> as any to get all of our git projects in the same place.
> 
> I'm proposing the following moves:
> 
> * Move all Taskotron projects to pagure.io using the taskotron group:
>- pagure.io/taskotron/libtaskotron
>- pagure.io/taskotron/resultsdb
>- etc.
> 
> * Move blockerbugs under the existing fedora-qa namespace in pagure:
>- pagure.io/fedora-qa/blockerbugs
> 
> I'm not sure if there are any plans for the openqa stuff that currently
> lives on bitbucket but it'd be nice to see that moved as well.
> 
> Any objections, comments, concerns?
> 

Sounds good to me.

Martin
___
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposal: Migrating More Git Projects to Pagure

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 09:21 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
> This came up in the qadevel meeting today and I wanted to put a bit
> more detail out.
> 
> Bitbucket was never intended to be the long-term home for our git
> projects - I think we're about the only folks in Fedora using it and
> it's not free software. As fedorahosted is closed down, we need to find
> a new home for blockerbugs but I figure that now is as good of a time
> as any to get all of our git projects in the same place.
> 
> I'm proposing the following moves:
> 
> * Move all Taskotron projects to pagure.io using the taskotron group:
>- pagure.io/taskotron/libtaskotron
>- pagure.io/taskotron/resultsdb
>- etc.
> 
> * Move blockerbugs under the existing fedora-qa namespace in pagure:
>- pagure.io/fedora-qa/blockerbugs
> 
> I'm not sure if there are any plans for the openqa stuff that currently
> lives on bitbucket but it'd be nice to see that moved as well.

We were planning to do the same, in fact, just haven't done it yet as
it hasn't become urgent. There's a ticket for it:

https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/T863

> Any objections, comments, concerns?

None at all, I fully support the everything-in-Pagure movement :)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org