Re: stats-bodhi license

2016-11-07 Thread Lukas Brabec
I'm fine with GPL2+
___
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: stats-bodhi license

2016-11-04 Thread Kamil Paral
> On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 14:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I'm back working on moving fedora-qa to Pagure. I'm now dealing with
> > the 'stats' scripts, and there's a problem: it appears that stats-bodhi
> > has never actually been properly licensed. It has no license header or
> > license text, and AFAICS, never has. I can't simply declare it to be
> > F/OSS licensed, as I didn't write it.
> > 
> > Can Lukas or Kamil give us a license declaration for this code? Thanks!
> 
> There's one other thing without an explicit license, leftover-tagged-
> builds.sh , which was written by Kamil. It's pretty trivial (and maybe
> no longer needed), but if you could declare a license that'd be good.

I think putting GPL2+ on them is a reasonable choice.

The leftover-tagged-builds.sh was I think written during some time that we had 
a lot of issues with Bodhi. I'd probably still keep it there, but yes, we 
haven't needed it lately.
___
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: stats-bodhi license

2016-11-03 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 14:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I'm back working on moving fedora-qa to Pagure. I'm now dealing with
> the 'stats' scripts, and there's a problem: it appears that stats-bodhi 
> has never actually been properly licensed. It has no license header or
> license text, and AFAICS, never has. I can't simply declare it to be
> F/OSS licensed, as I didn't write it.
> 
> Can Lukas or Kamil give us a license declaration for this code? Thanks!

There's one other thing without an explicit license, leftover-tagged-
builds.sh , which was written by Kamil. It's pretty trivial (and maybe
no longer needed), but if you could declare a license that'd be good.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


stats-bodhi license

2016-11-03 Thread Adam Williamson
I'm back working on moving fedora-qa to Pagure. I'm now dealing with
the 'stats' scripts, and there's a problem: it appears that stats-bodhi 
has never actually been properly licensed. It has no license header or
license text, and AFAICS, never has. I can't simply declare it to be
F/OSS licensed, as I didn't write it.

Can Lukas or Kamil give us a license declaration for this code? Thanks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org