Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 26/27] blockdev: Collect block device code in new blockdev.c

2012-05-17 Thread Artyom Tarasenko
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
 Am 15.12.2010 16:04, schrieb Artyom Tarasenko:
 On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
 From: Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com

 Anything that moves hundreds of lines out of vl.c can't be all bad.

 I know I'm late for this train, but why does this patch change the
 license of the former vl.c code from a BSD-like one to GPLv2?
 It seems to be contradicting the vl.c paragraph:

  * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
  * all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

 Right, I think this needs to fixed. Markus, can you send a patch?

Ping?

-- 
Regards,
Artyom Tarasenko

solaris/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/search/label/qemu



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 26/27] blockdev: Collect block device code in new blockdev.c

2010-12-15 Thread Artyom Tarasenko
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
 From: Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com

 Anything that moves hundreds of lines out of vl.c can't be all bad.

I know I'm late for this train, but why does this patch change the
license of the former vl.c code from a BSD-like one to GPLv2?
It seems to be contradicting the vl.c paragraph:

 * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
 * all copies or substantial portions of the Software.


-- 
Regards,
Artyom Tarasenko

solaris/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 26/27] blockdev: Collect block device code in new blockdev.c

2010-12-15 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 15.12.2010 16:04, schrieb Artyom Tarasenko:
 On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
 From: Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com

 Anything that moves hundreds of lines out of vl.c can't be all bad.
 
 I know I'm late for this train, but why does this patch change the
 license of the former vl.c code from a BSD-like one to GPLv2?
 It seems to be contradicting the vl.c paragraph:
 
  * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
  * all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

Right, I think this needs to fixed. Markus, can you send a patch?

Kevin