Re: [Qgis-developer] Valid or invalid geom in PostGIS?
ok. Thx. A. Il 16/01/2017 13:00, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto: Il 16/01/2017 12:59, aperi2007 ha scritto: Hi, I dont know any postgis specific server-side simplification option. :( Perhaps you mean the "rendering --> Enable feature simplification by default for newly added layers" ? yes, there is an option for server side simplification all the best ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Valid or invalid geom in PostGIS?
Hi, I dont know any postgis specific server-side simplification option. :( Perhaps you mean the "rendering --> Enable feature simplification by default for newly added layers" ? Thx. A. Il 16/01/2017 12:43, A Huarte ha scritto: Hi, do you have enabled the postgis server-side simplification for this layer? Maybe it could throw these errors. Alvaro ---- *De:* aperi2007 <aperi2...@gmail.com> *Para:* qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org *Enviado:* Lunes 16 de enero de 2017 12:16 *Asunto:* Re: [Qgis-developer] Valid or invalid geom in PostGIS? QGIS retrieve geometry from postgis using WKT or WKB ? AFAIK The WKT is less precision than WKB. A. Il 16/01/2017 11:37, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto: > Hi all, > when loading a layer in QGIS 2.18 I get from the PostGIS log panel a > series of notices of the type: > > 2017-01-16T11:34:521NOTA: NOTICE: Self-intersection at or near point > 619746.32941695023 4869530.4882389866 > 2017-01-16T11:34:521NOTA: NOTICE: IllegalArgumentException: Invalid > number of points in LinearRing found 3 - must be 0 or >= 4 > > Howevet, geoms seem valid: > > select ST_IsValid(the_geom) from istat where ST_IsValid(the_geom) = FALSE; > st_isvalid > > (0 rows) > > I'm puzzled, any explanation? > Thanks. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Valid or invalid geom in PostGIS?
QGIS retrieve geometry from postgis using WKT or WKB ? AFAIK The WKT is less precision than WKB. A. Il 16/01/2017 11:37, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto: Hi all, when loading a layer in QGIS 2.18 I get from the PostGIS log panel a series of notices of the type: 2017-01-16T11:34:52 1 NOTA: NOTICE: Self-intersection at or near point 619746.32941695023 4869530.4882389866 2017-01-16T11:34:52 1 NOTA: NOTICE: IllegalArgumentException: Invalid number of points in LinearRing found 3 - must be 0 or >= 4 Howevet, geoms seem valid: select ST_IsValid(the_geom) from istat where ST_IsValid(the_geom) = FALSE; st_isvalid (0 rows) I'm puzzled, any explanation? Thanks. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] [Server] performance questions
Hi Regis, The shapefile is obviously more fast in opne than a postgres connection. Is due to the different need of resources. The postgres need to assign a lot of resources for every connection that it is opening. I do't know quite well the pgpool solution, but I guess it cannot helpyou because AFAIK it is only for dirct connection. You should set is with a fastcgis but you have heowever the problem that postgres interrupt brutally the connection after some ten of minutes without any byte exchanging with the clinet. These mean that alsoif you use a fastcgi protocol but have a service not used for more than 30 minutes it will break connection from postgres side and so it need to restart the connection (and so take some time to do it) when the user ask for a new map. To avoid also all these questions we use the spatialite db that is fast like a shapefile toopen and have no the problem of connection and break of connection like the postgres. A. Il 23/02/2016 16:11, Régis Haubourg ha scritto: Andrea Peri wrote I Guess the time difference between the qgis desktop and qgis-server when using a postgres, is due to the protocol. Infact the http is a connection-less session-less protocoll, so after every map the qgis-server disconnect from postgres. Instead when you work on a qgis desktop as a user on its own pc you are connectin with a postgres and sray connected for all the time. So the postgres don't waste time to open and staryup your connection. Also don't forget that if you stay about 18-20 minutes without do nothing on qgis in a postgres connection. The postgres kill your connection and your qgis go in crazy state. A. Hi Andrea, You are right for the overhead part. This would not big a big issue if we did not have the overhead on postgres side for extent querying on SQL views. The same dataset in shape is open fast even at first connection. We use pgpool here so we do not have such trouble with idle connections being killed. Cheers Régis -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Server-performance-questions-tp5252233p5252247.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Label polygons only outside of polygons
Hi, Andreas An option to put always a label outside from a polygon seem a good solution only when all the polygon are quite similar size (all small). Perhaps a better choice could be to have a label outside from a Polygon only when it is could not be all inside it ? Andrea Peri. Il 19/07/2015 15:14, Andreas Neumann ha scritto: Hi, I see that there are some recent new features regarding labelling: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/388e4047a75d155be0e677866f80d7423937ea30 and https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/3a44e294de08ee03c0386179693c61a3f76e5efe I have a question regarding Nyalls recent labelling improvements (the new options to act as obstacle layers). For a polygon layer, would it be possible to force the labels to always label outside of the feature? As an example I have a waste-water layer with small polygons representing special-form manholes (irregularly shaped). These polygons are usually too small to properly display the label inside the polygon and I would prefer to automatically place the label fully outside of the polygon. So, can I have a layer act both, as a label layer and as an obstacle layer? Or have another option, something like Force label to be outside of the polygon, to label always outside of the polygon of the feature? Here are two screenshots: This is how QGIS currently labels these polygons: http://www.carto.net/neumann/temp/qgis_label_over_polygon.pdf And this is how I would label them manually, outside of the polygon, but hope that a future QGIS version can do this automatically: http://www.carto.net/neumann/temp/manual_label_outside_polygon.pdf Thanks, Andreas ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Label polygons only outside of polygons
Sorry for my english. I would mean Perhaps a better choice could be to have a label outside from a Polygon only when it is could not be COMPLETELY CONTAINS ON it. Il 19/07/2015 16:47, aperi2007 ha scritto: Perhaps a better choice could be to have a label outside from a Polygon only when it is could not be all inside it ? ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] RFC for python server plugins ready for voting
This require to define a distinct aliasing on webserver for every service. And not allow to have one unique URL for all the services. This is good for who have one only service, but not good for who plan to serve many services. A. Il 04/10/2014 14:52, Alessandro Pasotti ha scritto: like disable-python-server-side ? Or enable it only for speciic project. This could be easily implemented at the webserver level or directly inside the plugins in case of need. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Proposal: move the Remove layer(s) button
Hi, I guess in a GIS oriented product Is necessary to avoid to mix the interface characteristics (the group is an interface object) and the data characteristics (the shapefile is not an interface object). I guess more beter if add/remove dataset is separated phisically from add/remove a group. The dataset is a phicical think. The shapefile is using separately from the qgis project. The group is not separately from qgis project. I guess is good question to have a remove group but avoiding to have a only button ADD Everything or an only button Remove everything Also I guess is important to help to understand when we are on dataset (physical) and when we are on interface (logical). Regards, A. Il 06/09/2014 07:10, Mathieu Pellerin ha scritto: Greetings, I'd like to circulate a UX proposal and see how people react. For a very long time, QGIS' Layers toolbar has featured a Remove layer(s) button. I have seen two issues with the button: - Its placement becomes really odd when plugins add button(s) to the Layers toolbar (for e.g. the New Memory Layer plugin as pictured here [ http://imgur.com/CEcIC3K,QvUzrti ]) - It can only remove vector/raster layers, won't remove groups With the recent improvements done by Martin Dobias on the legend, and in particular with his addition of a layer panel embedded toolbar, I propose that: - The Remove layer(s) button be moved to the layer panel embedded toolbar [ http://imgur.com/CEcIC3K,QvUzrti#1 ] - The button functionally is improved so it can also deal with the removal of group(s) Alternatively, we could get rid of the button altogether since layers and groups can be removed via right click or keyboard shortcut, but I suspect the touch screen based users might object. Any objection to moving the button to the new layers toolbar? Math ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Proposal: move the Remove layer(s) button
I know this, but my response is enlarged to a more conceptual problem. How avoid that an user could be confusing from when it act on a logical level of interface, and when it act on a physical data. I understand that removing mean always remove and so 1 only button is better than two. But my question is : if we remove the remove layers leaving only the remove this that is available in the context-menu (i dont see the new legend again). Seem quite logical to question: why there is a remove this only command and there is instead an add layer and an add group seaprated. Why two add and one remove ? So the next logical question is why not remove the two add ad introduce only an unique add here in the context-menu ? :) So my response was to a path that can start with the remove button and logically end on the add button. Regards, Andrea. Il 06/09/2014 08:12, Mathieu Pellerin ha scritto: I don't think you should comparing adding group/dataset against deleting a group/dataset legend layer. The latter is already unified via either a single keyboard shortcut and a single mouse right-click - remove action. On 6 Sep 2014 13:04, aperi2007 aperi2...@gmail.com mailto:aperi2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I guess in a GIS oriented product Is necessary to avoid to mix the interface characteristics (the group is an interface object) and the data characteristics (the shapefile is not an interface object). I guess more beter if add/remove dataset is separated phisically from add/remove a group. The dataset is a phicical think. The shapefile is using separately from the qgis project. The group is not separately from qgis project. I guess is good question to have a remove group but avoiding to have a only button ADD Everything or an only button Remove everything Also I guess is important to help to understand when we are on dataset (physical) and when we are on interface (logical). Regards, A. Il 06/09/2014 07:10, Mathieu Pellerin ha scritto: Greetings, I'd like to circulate a UX proposal and see how people react. For a very long time, QGIS' Layers toolbar has featured a Remove layer(s) button. I have seen two issues with the button: - Its placement becomes really odd when plugins add button(s) to the Layers toolbar (for e.g. the New Memory Layer plugin as pictured here [ http://imgur.com/CEcIC3K,QvUzrti ]) - It can only remove vector/raster layers, won't remove groups With the recent improvements done by Martin Dobias on the legend, and in particular with his addition of a layer panel embedded toolbar, I propose that: - The Remove layer(s) button be moved to the layer panel embedded toolbar [ http://imgur.com/CEcIC3K,QvUzrti#1 ] - The button functionally is improved so it can also deal with the removal of group(s) Alternatively, we could get rid of the button altogether since layers and groups can be removed via right click or keyboard shortcut, but I suspect the touch screen based users might object. Any objection to moving the button to the new layers toolbar? Math ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] QEP: QGIS Mapserver Python Plugins
Another question could be the timeout. Infact. If a processing take too much time to end. It should go in timeout. So not only concurrency need, but also a timeout system to avoid the lock never ending of resources. A. Il 30/08/2014 13:21, Alessandro Pasotti ha scritto: 2014-08-29 18:05 GMT+02:00 René-Luc Dhont rldh...@gmail.com: Le 29/08/2014 16:54, Alessandro Pasotti a écrit : 2014-08-29 16:39 GMT+02:00 René-Luc Dhont rldh...@gmail.com: Hi Alessandro Thanks for this interesting input. I'm happy to test it and to develope some use case. I thought it's a good feature and can help to enhance QGIS-Server easily : WPS, WMTS, Table Join Service, WFS2 or other that OGC does not already know. Regards, René-Luc Hello René-Luc, I'm happy to hear that you are going to test it, please let me know how it goes! Keep in mind that it's just a proof of concept, and yes, we need a RFC or QEP: the current implementation is the simplest, less obtrusive and quickest that I could think about. For example, I would consider adding real signals attached to plugins slots and cached parsed projects passed to plugin instances... I'm currently working on a WPS server plugin that bridges Processing and PyWPS (version 3.2.2 since the latest version 4 is tightly bound to werkzeug), now fighting with parameters but it basically works. Can I help ? I already done some works on it ! Regards Hello, I've got a first highly experimental Processing-PyWPS bridging plugin: https://github.com/elpaso/qgis-wps * I've only tested grass convex hull with a small shapefile * GetCapabilties and other requests work with GET calls ony * it needs Processing patches otherwise it hangs when reading pipes from shell process (see [1]) * Processing needs other patches as well to support concurrent requests (for example the grass temporary script storage should be done in tempfile instead of the current processing folder) I don't know Processing enough to say if there aren't any other big showstoppers for this plugin. Still a lot of work to do :) [1] https://github.com/elpaso/QGIS/commit/afbfb7f12b8f62731d40745035d919532ae5da1f ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Resurrecting the RFC (QEP - QGIS Enhancement Proposal)
Hi, only for better understanding every details, there is a list of actual member list of PSC. And my curiosity is for the affermations: after all, only 3 out of 7 positions are meant for developers I guess a short curriculum of every psc member could help to understand the role of everyone. Also, AOAIK an important question is undrstand the limit of a RFC. Infact don't forget that the main enhancement are always covered by one or more funders. Tipically they ask an enhancement with some request themself. This RFC in the QGIS world is obviously after the real fund phase where the funders find the developer and contract him. So what mean that the RFC is submittable to the PSC ? If the PSC to accept the RFC required more changeables and these changeable require more fund, what happened ? Or this RFC could be submitted before to find the developer and fund him ? In this second situation, the RFC should be submited from the funders ? Thx, Andrea. Il 25/08/2014 07:42, Martin Dobias ha scritto: I had the same impression as Nyall. PSC is meant to steer direction of the whole project, not to deal with technical details of implementations in QEPs - after all, only 3 out of 7 positions are meant for developers. At the same time I understand that creating another developer committee would make things more complex. I think that voting on QEPs could be started when the QEP's author has impression that enough consensus was reached. Most projects also allow their RFCs to go to 'deferred' state if the proposal is too controversial. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Geospackage Slow in QGIS
Hi Zoltan. Yes, this is the usual solution in the sqlite world. I don't like it because is not a scalable solution when there are many records and there are relations with other tables. Also an usual problem is to have a primary key filed with the same values of the original table. The solution create table as select ... dont allow to have a primary key field of type integer incremental. It need a more uggly create table(...); insert into select . But also this don't allow to have the same pk for the same records. A. Il 18/08/2014 22:41, Siki Zoltan ha scritto: Dear Andrea, what about using DB Manager's SQL window? There you can input an SQL select. To remove a column in SQLite you can create a new table without the column to delete and then use INSERT INTO new_table SELECT ... Regards, Zoltan On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Andrea Peri wrote: Just to explain why this is an important question. On a sqlite db is impossible to remove a field. So if a table is with two geometry field, it is never see-able from qgis. Because is not possible a command like: alter table remove filed geometry-2; Bye, Andrea Peri. 2014-08-18 16:52 GMT+02:00 Andrea Peri aperi2...@gmail.com: Hi, I have changed my opinin. From +1 to +0 Infact I discovered just now that gdal driver for spatialite don't seem to support tables with more than 1 geometrt field. Almost on QGIS. Andrea 2014-05-17 22:19 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Palmer jpal...@linz.govt.nz: I'm wondered why QGIS needs a native SpatiaLite provider and connection dialogue any more. Unlike other database providers such as PostGIS, Oracle, MSSQL the SpatiaLite provider doesn't seem to have anything special that requires a QGIS provider. From a users perspective it just adds to the confusion and complexity for adding data. Why not just use GDAL/OGR for both Geopackage and Spatialite? Cheers Jeremy From: Stefan Keller [sfkel...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, 18 May 2014 12:24 a.m. To: Martin Dobias Cc: Jeremy Palmer; qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Geospackage Slow in QGIS Hi Martin It has a different binary encoding compared to Spatialite. And in addition it integrates raster tiles (MBTiles) and metadata. -S. 2014-05-17 14:10 GMT+02:00 Martin Dobias wonder...@gmail.commailto:wonder...@gmail.com: Hi On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Jeremy Palmer jpal...@linz.govt.nzmailto:jpal...@linz.govt.nz wrote: I've just been using the new implementation of Geopackage in QGIS :) However each map render or feature info is very slow for large database files - even with the new GDAL/OGR Geopackage spatial index support. Each time QGIS renders a new map view or executes a feature info it re-opens the Geopackage file in QgsOgrFeatureIterator via OGROpen, and the Geopackage driver open method runs PRAGMA integrity_check which is very slow (4 secs with my 2GB test file). This integrity check is actually a Geopackage requirement. How can this be fixed? At the in QGIS or GDAL/OGR level? Actually I am wondering how different is the format of GeoPackage from the format of SpatiaLite... we could use our native SpatiaLite provider also for GeoPackage files if they are close enough. Any ideas? Regards Martin ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.orgmailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer This message contains information, which may be in confidence and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately (Phone 0800 665 463 or i...@linz.govt.nz) and destroy the original message. LINZ accepts no responsibility for changes to this email, or for any attachments, after its transmission from LINZ. Thank You. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- - Andrea Peri . . . . . . . . . qwerty ˙˙ - ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS server ignores optional SVG symbols path
I guess the issue was resolved. Look at this tickets. http://hub.qgis.org/issues/10327 and this http://hub.qgis.org/issues/8664 You should define one or more environment variables. for path. We use this approach succesfully. A. Il 14/08/2014 17:54, Alessandro Pasotti ha scritto: Hi, I noticed that when I use SVG symbols located in an optional path as set in Settings-Options-System-SVG Paths the symbols are not found from QGIS server. The solution would be to add such information (currently missing) to the project file, because this is mandatory for the server to locate the symbols. Should I file a ticket? ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] [Qgis-user] A discussion: is qgis still affordable in Europe if it violate the Inspire directive ?
Sorry Alx, perhapsyou don't know well the WMS specs ? The QGIS server is really far from be a good WMS sErver. It has not the multy style rendering. It has not the named groups if don't allow to change the html response . It don't allow to return a GML response to the user in a GetFeatureInfo if don't active the WFS ption. This is obviously unacceptable. Because there is some layer that a Public Administration cannot put in download as they are. The GeoServer and MapServer are real WMS Server and they allow all of this and more other thinks. The ONLY question good of qgis is The project qgis is the the same in the server. You think really that ths is a killer advantage that could put an administration to choose an incopmaptible with the WMS specs piece of software instead of a fully compliant with the WMS specs ? :)) Is really ore easy to invest on an author for GeoServer of for Mapserver rather than waste public fund in a Incompatible piece of software. Because the laws deny to choose it. I guess you can also hope to sell your service to someone . But if it ask you: Hey your software is compliant with OGC WMS ? This is a mandatory need for inspire. You what say to your possible future client ? Yes or No but I hope you fund it to become. We fund really many enhancement in qgis. And fund also the repair when there was the break-api from 1.8 to 2.0 After funding the repair for 2.0 the compatibility was lost from 2.0 to 2.2. And now we need to refund the repair of compatibility from 2.2 to 2.4 What credibility could have a fnd that point to grnt a compatibilit of qgis 2.4 on WMS specs. Who put the GetPrint tags in the getprint ? It has do this to have an advantage and probably to sell its product to someone. I say : ok you have your advantage, you have take your money, and now ? You have destroyed the credibility of qgis as an WMS Server OGC. You choose to eat the egg today instead of take the chicken tomorrow, and now ? Are you happy of this ? I guess who break repair. So I guess the solution should be put and fund by who involontary or volontary (i don't know) break the WMS specs compatibility. Or otherwise the qgis group say: we don't care about the wms compatibility so choose other software for this work. But I guess there many service seller that go around to sell service on qgis and say that it is a server wms compiant with WMS specs. It is a really bad practice. And is necessary to make understand to the reader of this miling list that they actualy are funding for a good desktop software, but absolutely an incompatible server side component. This is necessary to know ewhen a public administration choose a software instead of another. Andrea. Il 08/06/2014 07:08, Alex Mandel ha scritto: You are assuming a new deployment and one where QGIS is not used on the desktop, where some groups may decide to use it for both in order to cut down on IT staffing requirements. You are also assuming the choice is as simple as picking a new one, there is plenty of people time involved in deploying a different strategy and redo-ing all the styling to fit the new way. Sure QGIS can push to geoserver now but running geosever means running a JAVA stack. Switching to Mapserver would be more similar with an apache setup but the QGIS export to Mapserver has long since fallen into disrepair so now you'd need to make separate style rules for 2 programs. I completely agree, QGIS should maintain compliance. My argument is that organizations that are shifting money from proprietary licenses should invest in ensuring an open source product meets their needs. To not do so means at any time there be no options that fit their requirements. I think I've also provided the links that show QGIS can be WMS compliant and still have extra options, the spec provides for how to do it, we just need to make the modifications and test it. Thanks, Alex On 06/07/2014 02:40 PM, Maurizio Trevisani wrote: Hello, you say As to why fund it? If QGIS provides other value to your organization in some other way, total cost of operation may be lower to simply ensure it's compliant rather than to switch software or have to use multiple software. but as long you, Public Administration, can choose among several GFLOSS to implement your OGC services (that must be completely interoperable with all the potential clients and other PA), why should you choose a product that has choosen not to be interoperable? The problem is not the product, but the people who doesn't mind to write interoperable code: they are not reliable - so why a PA should fund them and their products? Qgis is an important product in the GFLOSS reality, but now more than ever should take care to complethely adhere to all the international standards, especially those which are at the basis for interoperability. Bye. 2014-06-07 22:17 GMT+02:00, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com: On 06/07/2014 01:06 PM, Andrea Peri wrote:
Re: [Qgis-developer] [Qgis-user] A discussion: is qgis still affordable in Europe if it violate the Inspire directive ?
Il 08/06/2014 15:42, Andreas Neumann ha scritto: You can help to make QGIS server more standards compliant, but you have to properly document this (with links to specifications) and find a developer willing to work on this. I am quite confident that these issues can be resolved. Sorry Andras thx for your attention to this question, but I'm not able to do what you say. The specs: What specs are you say ? I have the iso specs of WMS 1.3.0 but they are payable. Not availables to no one for free. Instead on internet there are the OGC specs that are pretty equals. They are free and available to everyone. I sufficient to goto OGC download and read. developer willing to work on this. Also this is not clear to me. :) I have just patched my server. Why I should pay another to do the same think ? Probably the problem is that the solution I apply is not so graceful to others :) We don't need the GetStle and GetPrint command.So for us is absolutely not imortant to preserve them. The GetStyles is not available on GGeoserver and on MApServer , and we plan to create a federation of WMS servers where every users use the wms server it like better. But surely not plan to use a not standard wms server. So no interest for GetStyle and GetPrint command. So why I should pay to preserve them ? We pay many really many money in these year for QGIS. And just now start to pay again because after three month qgis 2.4 start with another break that break some plugin we realize some time ago. And more probably at the next 2.6 release should be again to pay for another break. And just now we have payed to our actual QGIS partner to resolve some serious bg on SVG managing and also to support better the SVG on qgis-server. These are all ok for us. We are happy to fund the resolution of these bugs. And I suppose other public administration do as us. Also we plan some other enhancement to QGIS. (francly I guess it will be the last) But I don't like to pay for something that is not interested for us. I'm capable now to transform my server qgis in a compliant wms server. I simpli remove the GetStyle and GetPrint from the getcapabilities response. Is easy and cheap. I guess the problem to move the GetStyle and GetPrint in an enhancement section of getcapabilites should be fund by who has interest to have a compliant qgis-server but also interest to have and use a proprietary solution like GetPrint. We are not interested to save the GetStyle and GetPrint. Why I should pay someone else? To do what I have just do ? For who interest in my change to code it is easy. in a unique file .c change three or four row of code and comment other 7-8 row. However I put the code sample in the ticket I opened yesterday . So who interested find all on it. regards, Andrea. Il 08/06/2014 15:42, Andreas Neumann ha scritto: You can help to make QGIS server more standards compliant, but you have to properly document this (with links to specifications) and find a developer willing to work on this. I am quite confident that these issues can be resolved. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] [Qgis-user] A discussion: is qgis still affordable in Europe if it violate the Inspire directive ?
Hi, just for completation (have I apologize before for my trmendous english ?) The specs OGC WMS 1.3.0 final approval is dated year 2006. http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=14416 Open Geospatial Consortium Inc. Date: 2006-03-15 Reference number of this document: OGC® 06-042 Version: 1.3.0 Category: OpenGIS® Implementation Specification Editor: Jeff de la Beaujardiere OpenGIS® Web Map Server Implementation Specification Copyright © 2006 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Regards, Andrea. Il 08/06/2014 20:56, aperi2007 ha scritto: Il 08/06/2014 15:42, Andreas Neumann ha scritto: You can help to make QGIS server more standards compliant, but you have to properly document this (with links to specifications) and find a developer willing to work on this. I am quite confident that these issues can be resolved. Sorry Andras thx for your attention to this question, but I'm not able to do what you say. The specs: What specs are you say ? I have the iso specs of WMS 1.3.0 but they are payable. Not availables to no one for free. Instead on internet there are the OGC specs that are pretty equals. They are free and available to everyone. I sufficient to goto OGC download and read. developer willing to work on this. Also this is not clear to me. :) I have just patched my server. Why I should pay another to do the same think ? Probably the problem is that the solution I apply is not so graceful to others :) We don't need the GetStle and GetPrint command.So for us is absolutely not imortant to preserve them. The GetStyles is not available on GGeoserver and on MApServer , and we plan to create a federation of WMS servers where every users use the wms server it like better. But surely not plan to use a not standard wms server. So no interest for GetStyle and GetPrint command. So why I should pay to preserve them ? We pay many really many money in these year for QGIS. And just now start to pay again because after three month qgis 2.4 start with another break that break some plugin we realize some time ago. And more probably at the next 2.6 release should be again to pay for another break. And just now we have payed to our actual QGIS partner to resolve some serious bg on SVG managing and also to support better the SVG on qgis-server. These are all ok for us. We are happy to fund the resolution of these bugs. And I suppose other public administration do as us. Also we plan some other enhancement to QGIS. (francly I guess it will be the last) But I don't like to pay for something that is not interested for us. I'm capable now to transform my server qgis in a compliant wms server. I simpli remove the GetStyle and GetPrint from the getcapabilities response. Is easy and cheap. I guess the problem to move the GetStyle and GetPrint in an enhancement section of getcapabilites should be fund by who has interest to have a compliant qgis-server but also interest to have and use a proprietary solution like GetPrint. We are not interested to save the GetStyle and GetPrint. Why I should pay someone else? To do what I have just do ? For who interest in my change to code it is easy. in a unique file .c change three or four row of code and comment other 7-8 row. However I put the code sample in the ticket I opened yesterday . So who interested find all on it. regards, Andrea. Il 08/06/2014 15:42, Andreas Neumann ha scritto: You can help to make QGIS server more standards compliant, but you have to properly document this (with links to specifications) and find a developer willing to work on this. I am quite confident that these issues can be resolved. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Changing colour of SVG symbols
You mean this ? http://www.sourcepole.com/svg-symbols-in-qgis-with-modifiable-colors This need to modificate manually the svgs t add some tokens inside them. Andrea. Il 23/05/2014 10:31, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto: Hi all. I'm working on some SVG symbols for QGIS. I wish to make it possible to change their colour in QGIS: anyone has a pointer to an howto? Thanks. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Geospackage Slow in QGIS
I have really difficulty to write of a so complex question in english. :( However try to explain. The shapefile is absolutely a bad solution for interchange usage. We experiment every day troubles. Sometimes the troubles was discovered after many time. The shapefile born as a simply format for a simply GIS product. SO the major request was t be simpler possible. And infact the shapefile is really simply. The shp specs use the DBF format, but forgot that of DBF format there are many ,sometimes also really distinct to each other. (read the old clipper dbf spec and the old ashton-tate dbf spec to understand what this mean). So two shapefile could be not compatible at all. Also the shapefile don't sauy nothing of character-set usage. This is a bad question because often we must try more than one Character-set and hope to have no mixing of CS to retrieve correctly the texts. Also the shapefile don't has a NULL definition and also it allow the strange mix of MULTIPART and SIMPLY geometries. All this and so on are foe for a real interchangeable format because usually this mean that I export from a remote system , from a distinct GIS solution to every other solution. We every day use the gdal to transform (thx to gdal forever), but gdal cannot do miracles. A format born for interchange is surely the GML. It allow to define a different SRS for every geometry, also allow to host every typeof geometry , but the GML failed in the market because the geometric definition was not well explained and so every GIS software choose to do its own interpretation of the geometrical tag in the GML. Obviously the postgis , oralce and so on are not really nterchange formats because they are only dump of the DBMS information. Another good candidate for interchange was the spatialite. The lastversion 4.2 is really good. It host metadata, host styles, host history and convert al to the UTF-8 internal. It has some limitation respect to the GML. The GML allow to have a distinct SRS for every geometry instead the spatialite allow a SRS for every table (dataset). But this limitation will not be a real limit today, perhaps in the next 2-3 year it will became a limit. But the spatialite has another limit for a good interchange format. It is also an elaboration unit. This is an advantage for me , but not for a real interchange format that need only host data. And give the elaboration phase to the GIS. This is a philosophy I don't like more, but has its own reasons . So why the geopackage is not a good work format ? The response is because it is a interchange format. The need of a work frmat are different from that of a work format. The first need to but not redundant, more compact, but without loss any information or setting and compressable. The shapefile is nothing. It is not a good interchange format, and not a good working format. :) The spatialite is like a DBMS, it is a good work format. And has some point of interest in the interchange. The capability internally to speak with shapefile, postgres, dxf, wfs and GML/XML are good options. Also it hs a good elaboration capability. Is has no the limit of the shapefile and this is good. It host the styles and this is good. But has also some bad points. It is no so universal diffuse. Only qgis know it, and the qgis seem to have an own spatialite dialect not fully compatible with the original spatialite. The styles on spatialite are supported from qgis but they are incompatible respect at original spatialite version and this is a bad point. The metadata tables of spatialite are ignored from qgis. So the spatialite seem to be a chatedral in the desert. The spatialite will never to be a real interchange format if the only software to use it is qgis and the same qgis is not real compatible with the original spatialite spec. So the spatialite actually is a really good and strong work format . Instead surely geopackage are no one strong point in elaboration so I'm not surprise that it is slow. It don't born to do this work. :) A. Il 17/05/2014 11:24, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto: Il 17/05/2014 11:03, Andrea Peri ha scritto: Do you know the requirements of gpkg ? They should be really minimal. This could help understanding speed issues: http://openjump.blogspot.fi/2014/02/openjump-plus-reads-ogc-geopackages.html All the best. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] SQL Injection vulnerability
AFAIK in a SLD style should never be put a direct sql string.
The SQL is at datasource level for dataset filter and this is a question
outside from the style.
In the style should be put only some filter for classifications.
This is more affordable with the CQL rather than SQL.
Apart from this,
in the SQL the more suitable character for sql injection is the ; char
The ; char is the break for every command and so
it allow some trick.
As example:
string= ;delete from name-table;
with the ; ias first char is capable usually to do work this string also
in a system where it
is is a concatenation in
'select * from table-2 where (' || string || ');'
it became:
'select * from table-2 where ( ;delete from name-table; );'
a dbms that try to execute this will do an error of-course, because
select * from table-2 where ( ;
is an error, but after this it could execute the
delete from name-table;
and this is not an error.
my 2 ct.
Andrea.
On 06/03/2014 19:25, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
Hi Gino,
On Thu, 06. Mar 2014 at 18:51:58 +0100, Gino Pirelli wrote:
Thank you Jürgen, I feel safer ;) but... I can't figure out how postgres
quote_* methods manage -- Comments or String without Quotes that can
break SQL statement or introduce elements that can't be escaped...
quotedValue puts ' around the value and duplicates all inner ' so that they are
not interpreted as quotes that end the string, but as quotes inside the string
and also duplicates backslashes so that they are interpreted as backslashes
instead of giving the following character a special meaning.
What else is there to handle?
Jürgen
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] New feature: RFC saving style and ui in Spatialite
The 3MB size is the size of an empty DB spatialite . A DB emty is 3MB size . A DBspatialite with 1 single dataset of 10MB is 3MB +10MB = 13MB. A DBspatialite with 3 dataset everyone of 10MB is 3MB + 10MB +10MB + 10MB = 33MB. Also, AFAIK the goal of Luigi is storing in the spatialite the SLD finalized to rendering the same dataset stored in the spatialite, not to store SLD for general usage. Regards, Andrea. On 05/02/2014 22:24, Etienne Tourigny wrote: Saving style as spatialite files would probably cause a significant file size overhead - don't all spatialite files take at least 3MB for the SRS tables? On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Gino Pirelli lui...@gmail.com mailto:lui...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm developing a new feature to save SLD and ui in Spatialite provider in the same way this function is available for postgres. this function developed for Faunalia is funded by ARPA Piemonte fork is available at: https://github.com/luipir/QGIS/tree/spatialite-savestyle and actual modification are localized in this commit: f058bea1fe51116b8231eb5c1ca4faee485c38b2 there are some question about how to develop it and are related how to manage XML in a sqlite/spatialite table. this code derive by the postgres provider code where QML and UI xmls are recorded in a XML column. XML is a postgres type. This type is not available in SQlite but it's available in SL 4.1 (called XmlBlob [1]) In this preliminary commit XML is saved in a text column, but saving XML as a blog (blob type in sqlite or XmlBlob in SL) have the advantage to avoid all encoding problems. so the question is... sqlite blob or spatialite xmlbob? Blob type can't allow XML parsing using SQL queries XmlBlob allows this (using libxml2) Blob type is sqlite native type XmlBlob can be used only with SL 4.1 My preference is to use native data type Blob. What's you opinion about blob/ xmlblob or whatever regards, Luigi Pirelli (luigi.pire...@faunalia.it mailto:luigi.pire...@faunalia.it - lui...@gmail.com mailto:lui...@gmail.com) [1] https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libspatialite/wiki?name=XmlBlob-intro ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Font for tests
The arial is not available on linux machines. But the liberation Fonts are an Arial with an opensource licensing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberation_fonts We use they usually with MapServer and qgis-server. If interested, follow this link for the download. https://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/ Regards, A. On 10/01/2014 19:45, Larry Shaffer wrote: Hi Matthias, On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Matthias Kuhn matthias.k...@gmx.ch mailto:matthias.k...@gmx.ch wrote: Hi, I was looking at some of the tests, and realized, that the composerhtml test fails because of some slight font differences. Firebug tells me that the following fonts are used (defined by bootstrap.css): Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif I don't have any of these Helvetica fonts installed and I am not sure about their licensing, but it seems that no package includes them just like that. Does anybody know a font which is just available out of the box on all plattforms to get around such issues? Arial maybe? This option seems much better to me than fixing things with a tolerance param. About a year ago, I added a custom built, very lightweight font, FreeSansQGIS, just for tests [0], based off of FreeSans. Usage info is explained in its README [1], notably that the font not be installed on the system. It is intended to be loaded on-the-fly via Qt's font-handling routines, and is already available in the utilities.py module via loadTestFont() [2]. I have also added it to the startup functionality of the QGIS app and server [3], which loads the font if the testdata directory is available, e.g. when running ctest from build directory. Feel free to fix anything wrong with my implementation. Regardless, I have still seen differences in how the same font is drawn by the different systems' window server, so some amount of tolerance (or a set of anomalies) is probably always going to be needed. Though, hopefully that's not a moving target because of the standardized test font. Recently I came across another test font used by the MapServer project, which we might also consider using because it also has bold face [4]. Not sure how it compares to the 'normal' Vera font. However, I think if it is used it should still be renamed to FreeSansQGIS to avoid conflict with installed fonts, and make it easily searchable in the QFontDatabase. [0] https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/tree/master/tests/testdata/font [1] https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/tests/testdata/font/FreeSansQGIS-README.txt [2] https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/tests/src/python/utilities.py#L218-L228 [3] https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/src/app/main.cpp#L739-L746 https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/src/mapserver/qgis_map_serv.cpp#L244-L253 [4] https://github.com/mapserver/mapserver/tree/master/tests/vera Regards, Larry Have a nice weekend, Matthias ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS Web Client improvements
On 03/01/2014 13:06, Alessandro Pasotti wrote: I also think it's not possible at the moment. But I like the way it was implemented in other frameworks, all I need is a way to get the style image for a single class. I guess we need to add a custom WMS method to the QGIS Server. This is possible using the optional parameter scale from wms specs. Using it and the layers param. You could identify a single layer and get the legend at a specific scale. Apy attention: if you do not specify the scale parameter the wms server will return the render to ALL the scale. This mean tahat the renddering is a point a little scale and a polygon at large scale, it will return an mage with a point and a polygon. Regards, Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS Web Client improvements
The RULE ? It need to know exactly the class name, but AFAIK the rule name is not available from the GetCapabilities don't ? A. On 03/01/2014 15:27, Alessandro Pasotti wrote: 2014/1/3 Yves Jacolin yjaco...@free.fr mailto:yjaco...@free.fr Hello, Le vendredi 3 janvier 2014 13:14:57 aperi2007 a écrit : On 03/01/2014 13:06, Alessandro Pasotti wrote: I also think it's not possible at the moment. But I like the way it was implemented in other frameworks, all I need is a way to get the style image for a single class. I guess we need to add a custom WMS method to the QGIS Server. This is possible using the optional parameter scale from wms specs. Using it and the layers param. You could identify a single layer and get the legend at a specific scale. Apy attention: if you do not specify the scale parameter the wms server will return the render to ALL the scale. This mean tahat the renddering is a point a little scale and a polygon at large scale, it will return an mage with a point and a polygon. Maybe I did not understand what alessandro said, but it seems to me that it is rather the RULE parameter for the GetLegendGraphic that allow you to get the legend for one class. See https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/901 Y. Thanks Yves, this is exactly what I need. This is only available in master but not in 2.0.1, correct? -- Alessandro Pasotti w3: www.itopen.it http://www.itopen.it ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS Web Client improvements
On 03/01/2014 15:47, rldhont wrote: Yes, but you can query the style in SLD and have the CLASS name. Others clients like mapfish use it Regards, René-Luc D'Hont Hi, Is really interst this information. I don't know this option. Is a wms specs request ? Thx, Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS Web Client improvements
Sorry, I don't understand before. Obviously this mean that this solution is not for external wms where there isn't this little php addon. Only for direct accessible server where is possible to add this php/python addon. Also perhaps is better to add a vendor-specific parameter to the getcapabilites of qgis. So you have no problem in evolutions of projects .qgs file formats A. On 03/01/2014 15:45, Alessandro Pasotti wrote: 2014/1/3 aperi2007 aperi2...@gmail.com mailto:aperi2...@gmail.com The RULE ? It need to know exactly the class name, but AFAIK the rule name is not available from the GetCapabilities don't ? Yes, but as I wrote, with a small Python/PHP helper that parses the project file we can get that information and bind the two. The SVG legend (if contains proper attributes to build the FILTER) would work without an additional helper. -- Alessandro Pasotti w3: www.itopen.it http://www.itopen.it ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] min/max for rasters
AFAIK The strategy of 2-98 is usually useful when there a noised image, because we assume that the noise is a white noise and it is randomized an isolated spikes. THis is absolutely a right theory and really useful, ma what kind of imagge are usually used in a gis system. If we think at the ortophoto image the noise could be really happened because they came from a photo-sensor. But is we think to a artificial image, like the 2-colors balck-white images named carta tecnica thata are trasposition of vectorial data. Them are no noised images and has a really thin lines. Also the artifical thematic chars with colors and point and symbols and lines (outline and so on) are noise-less images. Don't forget to think also to geological charts. Are all noise-less images. So what kind of image are more used in a GIS system ? This is not simple question. The response is , it is dependent by the kind of work you should do.. But also another question is: Usually the ortophoto are not simple to have . They are produced and have a license. The thematic images are more easy to produce and are often without a license or has a free license. More often the ortophoto images are available from a WMS system, and this is a solution that deny the use of the 2-98 strategy. Andrea. On 14/12/2013 07:17, Paolo Cavallini wrote: Il 13/12/2013 20:18, Radim Blazek ha scritto: Can you describe some examples where 2-98% is a problem (data type, number of bands, map content, features/phenomena represented by those 2+2%,...) so that we can think about it better? Example #1 (less problematic): dtm and their legend are always shown wrong; newbies do not understand why Example #2 (more serious): rasterizing sparse vectors (e.g. rivers) results in a black rectangle, as the number of pixels with valid data is 2%. In fact, I think we should help users more, e.g. by applying non linear colour scaling (log, exp) in case of very skewed raster values distribution: if data are more or less normally distributed, no cut is applied, and linear scaling is used; if they are badly skewdw or with outliers, apply a non linear colour scaling. With some thinking, this should solve most if not all user cases, without asking a normal user to understand much about raster stats. However, in my case the general setting use min/max does not seem to be working. Thanks for your thoughts. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Reliable way to determine a groupIndex in the legend tree
I guess instead that much better should be a group checkbox that enable/disable the under childs layer. This allow OFF the actual configuration or ON that same configuration. Actually the group checkbox when checked put ON all the layer. This often is mean too much information . Instead the mutual exclusive need to choose only one. And in that case disable and ri-enable will reput the same original clayer. Andrea. On 10/10/2013 10:08, Vincent Schut wrote: On 10/09/2013 11:41 PM, Nyall Dawson wrote: Personally, I am also interested in enhancing group options in the layer tree. Groups are not just stupid containers with only toggling of visibility. They could also have a group opacity and blending and group metadata. Later on we may also have clipping and masking on groups. So we really should have an extensible mechanism for groups as new group features appear. One thing I'd love to see is the ability to make the layers in a group mutually exclusive. (ie, imagine radio buttons instead of checkboxes for controlling the visibility of layers within that group). I find I'm often going through a process of switching one layer on, then switching a bunch of other layers off for comparison purposes. A mutually exclusive layer group which automatically switched the other child layers off when I select a layer would make this process much nicer! +1 for this feature from a frequent user! Best, Vincent. Nyall ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Suppress rendering of small features
Not always is preferrable to suppress the small features. Often in our rendering we prefere to substitute a small rendering of kind polygon with a point rendering at lowest scales. This is possible using the Rule-Rendering also is possible to use the rule-rendering to define a rule that in a scale interval and with a dimension interval the feature is render using a point rendering and change in a polygon rendering when the scale grow. Andrea. On 12/09/2013 02:13, Nyall Dawson wrote: Hi all, I've been chatting with Nathan about adding a feature to QGIS which would allow suppression of rendering features smaller than a set threshold for vector layers. (There's already a similar function in the labelling engine Suppress labeling of features smaller than). This feature would come in handy for me for several tables which contain a wide range of very small - very large features, which cause slow rendering at small scales. I'm just checking that if I code this up it's not going to be duplicated effort - Nathan is under the impression that someone else has been talking about adding something similar. Is there currently any plans for a feature like this, or should I get started? Nyall ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Labels on topologically wrong polygons
On 24/07/2013 17:55, Larry Shaffer wrote: I think QGIS should offer the option to on-the-fly try to fix those geometries. This was discussed previously [0] The MakeValid is not a fast process. Try to apply it on-the-fly will slow again the labelling flow. Another problem is tht it could change little , but not less important, part of a geometry. so if the user will decide to edit it . Instead of editing the original geometry it will edit a changed geometry. And save in the shapefile (o r other container) another more changed geometry. Don't forgot that the original ST_MakeValid of postgis (and also spatialite) will return also the removed parts of original geometry. (point , arc or other it was) To not lost of view the original geometry. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Relative paths in mapserver
Hi, in mapserver is possible to define more environment variables and rfer to each of they for each of projects called. I guess this is a good and flexible approach. I don't know but perhaps is possible also in qgis-server. Regards, Andrea. On 20/06/2013 07:50, Alex Mandel wrote: On 06/19/2013 10:48 PM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 20/06/2013 07:31, Alex Mandel ha scritto: Shorter urls are easy with Apache using Alias (This is the same way recommended for Mapserver too) and symlinks. Thanks for the replies. Yes, I was aware of these solutions, I was kind of assuming it should have worked also with relative paths. All the best. - -- Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia The problem I see with that, is relative to what? Apache web root? fcgi location? Seems like a lot of possible options. Thanks, Alex ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] raster visualization
Hi Agus , thx for your informations. Opening the raster layers very fast but getting a bad visualization would not be a major waste of time? This is what currently happens to me: the initial display is always useless. I understand your point of view, but i guess is not a need for every users. Same users can't wait the 4+ minutes need for the elaboration of a raster. Again because an user could open usually more than 20 rasters for every session, I guess this elaboration should be absolutely optional to avoid a really big lost of time. If your raster layers have similar statistics and or you want to display them with the same stretching so that grey levels or colors are comparable (which is often my case also, with time series of ndvi for example), a common style file would be the best solution. Your solution seem good to me. We have more set of rasters of ortophoto type colors and grey. Eachset of colors photo is surely with comparable levels, instead I don't know for the gray photo sets. They are too older (1954 and so on). Instead for raster cell (grid data) from Lidar: Just now we begin to merge all our sets to have a full land-cover. So we are merging 1x1, 2x2 and 3x3 meters cells. I don't know if this could have some trouble with having a comparable set of values, but guess of no. Surely is not possible to find a unique style good for all the sets, but is possible to establish a good style for each set. ...Perhaps, in case a raster style is present, the by default procedure and calculations could be bypassed. Would this be a good solution in your case? You mean a file raster-style in the same folder of the raster set or of the catalog file ? I guess this could be a good compromise to help the use in situation like ours. Andrea. Il 22/04/2012 19:43, Agustin Lobo ha scritto: Andrea, Opening the raster layers very fast but getting a bad visualization would not be a major waste of time? This is what currently happens to me: the initial display is always useless. If your raster layers have similar statistics and or you want to display them with the same stretching so that grey levels or colors are comparable (which is often my case also, with time series of ndvi for example), a common style file would be the best solution. Perhaps, in case a raster style is present, the by default procedure and calculations could be bypassed. Would this be a good solution in your case? Agus El día 20 de abril de 2012 15:10, Andrea Periaperi2...@gmail.com escribió: - on initial load of a raster, generate a quicklook that is the larger of 1/4 screen resolution or 500x500 pixels by sampling every nth pixel - generate a histogram from the quicklook - calculate clipped 2% - 96% range min max for each band - apply a histogram stretch based on the above - the histogram could be used for generating the graph in raster props, and the quicklook could be used to create thumbs and previews etc - ideally we should cache these quicklooks and only regenerate them if the underlying dataset has changed I believe if we do this we will have fast initial load and the images (grayscale and rgb) will 'look right' when first loaded (i.e with good contrast) and it would not be necessary to assign any color value to grayscales by default. Regards Hi, just my 2 ct. I guess the more important capability with raster is to open they faster possible. I fear calculate all these values on first opened take more time than what is waitable for the open of a raster. Perhaps this action should be choosable by settings ? Of course I see our situation. Our situation is of more sets of raster (7-800 each set) where every raster is grey level or true color of 3-400 Mbyte each. And all these raster are accessible by a remote shared server to our users. For a total, actually, of about 13.000 rasters. I don't understand if this new feature could be really usable in a situation like our. -- - Andrea Peri . . . . . . . . . qwerty àèìòù - ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Re: WFS feature IDs: when required, when not?
Hi Bill, I guess perhaps you could calculate the PointOnSurface (don't the centroids) for every single feature received. The PointOnSurface (available on spatialite for example) Will Allow you to understand if a new Features received is the same or is another. Another technics should be calculate the UUID of every feautre received. I guess this technics should allow to understand almost pretty well if a feature is repeated or not. Regards, Andrea. Il 09/01/2012 15:29, Bill Clay ha scritto: All, Thanks to Andrea Peri, I have just discovered that WFS 1.0.0 apparently does NOT require a WFS server to report a unique feature ID with every feature it transmits (a typical newbie misconception?). The OGC specs are so nested and versioned, it's hard to be certain I've understood them correctly. Could someone be kind enough to enlighten me on the following? 1. Can you confirm or correct the following understandings: a. Every WFS server (versions 1.0.0 and 1.1.0) must have a permanent unique identifier for every feature. b. WFS GetFeature responses version 1.0.0 may or may NOT provide a unique fid attribute with each feature element, provided the layer is not editable (WFS-T). c. WFS GetFeature responses version 1.1.0 MUST provide a unique fid attribute with each feature element. 2. Are you aware of any common implementation of WFS 1.0.0 that does NOT always report a fid attribute with every feature element? (I understand TinyOFS can be configured not to do so.) 3. Do you believe that WFS services that do not always provide a fid with every feature are unusual enough that the QGIS WFS client can simply disable all feature caching for such servers? The proposal at item 3 would require GetFeatures to be requested for the entire canvas extent every time any previously un-fetched area is exposed on the canvas. Practically speaking, this means potentially long delays on every pan and zoom-out on maps containing WFS layers with many features that are hosted by such servers. Doubtless this is old news to everyone but me. Sorry for the static. Bill Clay ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] In the Postgis driver don't list schema without geometries
Hi, Using the postgis driver, the option Also list tables with no geometry work only on shemes where there is almost a table with geometry :) Infact I create a scema with only one table and this single table has no geometry. This schema and the table is not lists when try to connect to the DB. I guess this is a bug but I don't know if this is a problem for my qgis: qgis-dev (b34f924) on windows, with postgres 9.1.1 and postgis 2.0 someone can confirm it ? Thx, Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Re: In the Postgis driver don't list schema without geometries
are you sure it is not a permission problem? There are permissions schema usage and on table, views, and more. If you don't have the permissions, it won't be listed. Andreas Hi, I check my grant, its all ok. Also I update to the 1a1f5eb. But again I cannot see it. More explain: I can see all the tables without geometries. This is my use-case: I create a new schema after this I create a single unique tables in this newly created schema. This newly created table is without any geometry field. After this I insert some records n this table. After this, I try to inquity the db using the qgis postgis driver. setting: uncheck only look in the geometry_columns uncheck only look in public schema check also list tables without geometries check use estimated table metadata when I try to connect qgis list me another schema thata has many tables with geometries and tables without geometries. But this new created schema with the only one table is not listed. However I see there more problem because I notice that never the public schema was showed (it has no geoemtries table in my db) I notice also there is two checkbox named also list tables with no geometry. One is in the create new postgis connection windows and the other is in the add postgis table. Checking the checkbox in the create new postgis.. do nothing. Instead if I check the version in the add postgis table will do appear the public schema. Seem the checkbox also no geometry tables in the create new postgis... windows do absolutely nothing. However my newly create schema with only one table without geometry never appair :) Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Re: In the Postgis driver don't list schema without geometries
I have found why my schema don't appear. It was the Only look in the 'public' schema. Unchecking it was appeared. I was beat before because, when check the Only look in the public schema was reported me not only the tables in the public but also all the tables (with geometry) in other schemas . Now I guess this was reported because listed in the geometry_columns view. Regards, Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] osgeo4w qgis-dev unknown version
Hi, I notice the last available version of qgis-dev (from osgeo4w-setup) is numbered as b34f924 But this version (b34f924) is not listed in qgis-commit list. Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Re: shx missing
It must be possible, as there are utilities that do it, e.g. http://arcscripts.esri.com/details.asp?dbid=10806 and shapecheck. I do not know if there are free utils though. All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia Yes The great shapecheck. I use it from many years to resolve the missing shx file problem. I can confirm, It work really. The shx is only a position-link index. It link the position number of geometry (shp) to the position number of fileds (dbf) Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Re: shx missing
Hi all. If the .shx file is missing for a given .shp, qgis will correctly complain and will not load the shapefile. Apparently in other sw this issue is solved by rebuilding the shx[0] (it seems a common problem for CAD users, for instance[1]). Would it be feasible for qgis to have the same option? I do not think it is supported by OGR, so possibly it would be better to add it there? All the best. Hi, Guess another really useful tools should be a tool capable to re-organize a dbf following the shp + shx file. I explain better: Surely one important option is be able to create the SHX file from the SHP and DBF if it is missing. But also another very interesting situation is when the DBF is re-ordered wrongly. A sample situation is when a user open the DBF using other softwares like excel or access or also other similar softwares (openoffice, and so on) all DB-manager like capables to understand only the dbf file. This softwares when save the dbf unfortunately often they re-order the dbf. This is a very bad situation because after this reorder, the couple shp+shx are not-sync with the dbf. And a result of this is that the GIS tools begin the associate the wrong record to every geometry. In this situation, the shp file and the shx file are surely correct. They are not touched from a tools DB-only that write the dbf file. So I guess it should be possible to re-create a correct dbf correct ordered following the info of the SHX file. Regards, Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] How should work the placement over on adv-label
Hi Andrea I assume you are using old labeling system (Labels tab in layer properties) - this one does not handle collisions at all. Try new labeling instead (menu Layer Labeling -or- look for the icon in toolbar) and use horizontal or free placement - it should do what you need. Martin Great ! Thx Martin its exactly what I need. Regards, Andrea. Il 05/10/2011 19:45, Martin Dobias ha scritto: On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Andrea Periaperi2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have a situation of polygon like this: - | A | || | | | | B || | ||| | ||| | ||| | ||| | | || - Where the poly A has a hole and the poly-B fill exactly the hole of poly-A Hi Andrea I assume you are using old labeling system (Labels tab in layer properties) - this one does not handle collisions at all. Try new labeling instead (menu Layer Labeling -or- look for the icon in toolbar) and use horizontal or free placement - it should do what you need. Martin ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Re: Approximate reprojection for vectors
Hi, as you probably know, raster reprojection is using approximate reprojection to get acceptable rendering speed. Now I am thinking about a possibility to implement the same also for vectors, to speed up vectors rendering. What do you think about that? Does it make sense? Radim This is a very serious question. I will give my 2ct. What do you think about that? Does it make sense? I guess absolutely no. The mix in the same maps of data reprojected with lost precision and data not reprojected will produce wrongly maps. Regards, Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Re: Release plans for 1.7.1
Il 27/08/2011 03:59, Giuseppe Sucameli ha scritto: If I remember the problem Andrea wrote, neither the plugin installer worked under proxy in that case. Probably it was due a unsupported authentication method because proxy settings was well-filled. @Andrea, could you investigate further and give us more details about that proxy configuration, e.g. auth methods supported? I think we may find a solution sooner if people share our own experience in proxies, like Duarte did yet. Thanks a lot. Hi Giuseppe, We have some situations of some Local Governments that was absolutely unable to access to the plugins lists. Menawhile others was able to. After some try, we discovered that all the Local Government that was unable to access the local plugin was with a proxy with user/password. Unfortunately we don't have a proxy with user/pwd so we don't able to replicate. However thx to this Local Governments we can do some tests. We try with HttpProxy and with HttpProxyCaching , but no success. We discover also that the same problem was on Layer-WMS that use the same proxy settings. Also it don't work if the proxy use the couple user/pwd. To make the quest more complex was the fact that if the destination was inserted in a whitelist (of the proxy) then the proxy don't ask for the couple user/pwd and go directly to destination. These make all more complex because meanwhile the repository of the plugin are of course not in whitelist. Often the destinations of LayerWMS was in whitelist (ie: another Local Government that has a Wms Server and so on). Infact when the proxy see that the destination is in a whitelist don't ask the user/pwd but go to it directly. BUT PAY ATTENTION: if a destination is in a proxy whitelist don't mean is possible to go to it without setting the proxy. The proxy need to be set however. Only the proxy to go directly without ask for user/pwd. I don't know if the couple user/pwd that this proxies will ask for is really the couple user/pwd in the proxy settings page. - perhaps they are two thing completely different- Infact I don't understand why if the destination is in a whitelist the proxy should don't ask for usr/pwd. Instead I think the couple usr/pwd of these proxies is a sort of super-protection. Something like this - if the destination is unknown then I (the proxy) want to know who are you before allow you to go to the destination. Unfortunately is quite hard for me to do other tests using the Local Governments proxies. I prefer to install a my own proxy and use it for some tests. http://www.ausgamers.com/features/read/2638752 Let me know. If is need I try do it. Regards, Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Re: Release plans for 1.7.1
It would be nice to release 1.7.1 version with only bugfixes and no new features. I discovered that with QGIS 1.6-1.7 WMS connection never uses proxy user/password authentication, this is a big problem in corporate environments. I filed the bug #3844. The bug appeared after the rewrite of QGIS connection management (see this: #3912 it was fixed, but now it is broken again). +1 We discovered that also the plugin repository never uses proxy user/password. Perhaps will use the same classes ? It work only with proxy anonymous (without user/pwd). So to update the plugins we need to put the repositories in the white-list (very very bad practice for network administrators). Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Metatools: geographics box should be always in geograph. coords
Hi, Testing the Metatools, I notice the geographics box is always load with coords from actual SRS od map-canvas. Instead in the ISO19115 it should always be filled with Geographicals coords (lat. long). So it should convert the coords from SRS of MapCanvas to EPSG:4326. Regards, Andrea Peri. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Updating to psycopg2.4.2 ?
Hi, I notice there is avaliable a new psycopg2. http://initd.org/psycopg/articles/2011/06/12/psycopg-242-released/ Should be effort to update the osgeo4w package to this new version ? Some QGIS plugins need psycopg2. I see this new version has some enhancement with PG 9.0 as reported here. http://initd.org/psycopg/articles/2011/05/11/psycopg-241-released/ Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] qspatialite: error in the
Hi, after update to last version qspatilaite, opening the qspatialite plugin I see this error on windows . An error has occured while executing Python code: Traceback (most recent call last): File C:/Users/andrea/.qgis/python/plugins\QspatiaLite\qspatialite.py, line 67, in run dlg = QspatiaLiteDialog(self.load_to_canvas,self.get_layer_names,self.save_layer,self.delete_tmpshp, self.import_gis_files, self.viewresult, self.export2ogr, self.iface.mainWindow()) File C:/Users/andrea/.qgis/python/plugins\QspatiaLite\qspatialitedialog.py, line 103, in __init__ if not self.connect_to_spatialite(): #get connectionSettings and connection to spatialite DB File C:/Users/andrea/.qgis/python/plugins\QspatiaLite\qspatialitedialog.py, line 1225, in connect_to_spatialite self.prepare_tree() # prepare tree for new DB File C:/Users/andrea/.qgis/python/plugins\QspatiaLite\qspatialitedialog.py, line 726, in prepare_tree columnsList = self.get_columns(record[0]) File C:/Users/andrea/.qgis/python/plugins\QspatiaLite\qspatialitedialog.py, line 1182, in get_columns rep=cursor.execute(query) OperationalError: no such module: VirtualSpatialIndex Python version: 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Feb 21 2008, 13:11:45) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] QGIS version: 1.8.0-Trunk Trunk, 33c766c Python path: ['C:\\Users\\andrea\\.qgis\\python\\plugins\\cswclient', 'C:/osgeo4w/apps/qgis-dev/./python', 'C:/Users/andrea/.qgis/python', 'C:/Users/andrea/.qgis/python/plugins', 'C:/osgeo4w/apps/qgis-dev/./python/plugins', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\bin\\python25.zip', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25\\DLLs', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25\\lib', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25\\lib\\plat-win', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25\\lib\\lib-tk', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\qgis-dev\\bin', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25\\lib\\site-packages', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25\\lib\\site-packages\\win32', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25\\lib\\site-packages\\win32\\lib', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25\\lib\\site-packages\\Pythonwin', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25\\lib\\site-packages\\wx-2.8-msw-unicode', '/usr/share/qgis/python', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\qgis-dev\\python\\plugins\\fTools\\tools'] Regards, Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Using SVG symbol with modifiable color-widths
Hi Marco thx for response. it work very well. Just a little question for fill section. My symbols was with fill:none I try using fill:param(fill) none but qgis seem don't recognize it I guess the 'none' value is not supported right ? Hovewer thx for this enhancement. It is very useful and save me from make many symbols for more colors and more sizes. Andrea. Il 11/07/2011 17:39, Marco Hugentobler ha scritto: Hi Andrea I'm not sure, but it could be the single quotes. Try to change path style=fill:none;stroke:'param(outline) #00'... to path style=fill:none;stroke:param(outline) #00... If it does not help, attach the svg symbol to test. And the svg parametrisation works only with new symbology, not with the old one. Regards, Marco Am Samstag, 9. Juli 2011, 18.58:11 schrieb aperi2007: Hi, I'm try-ing the option to change the color/width of SVG symbol following instruction in http://www.sourcepole.ch/ After create the symbol with Inkscape I see the SVG has this structure: ... path style=fill:none;stroke:#00;stroke-width:0.1;stroke-linecap:butt; stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-opacity:1;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray :none ... so I try to change like this: path style=fill:none;stroke:'param(outline) #00';stroke-width:'param(stroke-width) 0.1';stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-opacity:1;stroke-mite rlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none ... Unfortunately it don't seem work. qgis don't render the symbol. Because I'm not an SVG expert perhaps I do some odd error. thx, Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Using SVG symbol with modifiable color-widths
Hi, I'm try-ing the option to change the color/width of SVG symbol following instruction in http://www.sourcepole.ch/ After create the symbol with Inkscape I see the SVG has this structure: ... path style=fill:none;stroke:#00;stroke-width:0.1;stroke-linecap:butt; stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-opacity:1;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none ... so I try to change like this: path style=fill:none;stroke:'param(outline) #00';stroke-width:'param(stroke-width) 0.1';stroke-linecap:butt;stroke-linejoin:miter;stroke-opacity:1;stroke-miterlimit:4;stroke-dasharray:none ... Unfortunately it don't seem work. qgis don't render the symbol. Because I'm not an SVG expert perhaps I do some odd error. thx, Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Update geos library in osgeo
Hi, Just now was released the geos 3.3.0 version. Is possible to update it in the osgeo package ? Regards, Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Error installing CSW plugin
Hi, updating the CSW plugin I have this error: Couldn't load plugin cswclient due an error when calling its classFactory() method Traceback (most recent call last): File C:/osgeo4w/apps/qgis-dev/./python\qgis\utils.py, line 138, in startPlugin plugins[packageName] = package.classFactory(iface) AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'classFactory' Python version: 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Feb 21 2008, 13:11:45) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] QGIS version: 1.8.0-Trunk Trunk, b02d06b Python path: ['C:\\Users\\andrea\\.qgis\\python\\plugins\\cswclient', 'C:\\Users\\andrea\\.qgis\\python\\plugins\\cswclient', 'C:/osgeo4w/apps/qgis-dev/./python', 'C:/Users/andrea/.qgis/python', 'C:/Users/andrea/.qgis/python/plugins', 'C:/osgeo4w/apps/qgis-dev/./python/plugins', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\bin\\python25.zip', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25\\DLLs', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25\\lib', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25\\lib\\plat-win', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25\\lib\\lib-tk', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\qgis-dev\\bin', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25\\lib\\site-packages', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25\\lib\\site-packages\\win32', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25\\lib\\site-packages\\win32\\lib', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25\\lib\\site-packages\\Pythonwin', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\Python25\\lib\\site-packages\\wx-2.8-msw-unicode', 'C:\\osgeo4w\\apps\\qgis-dev\\python\\plugins\\fTools\\tools'] Regards, Andrea Peri. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Strange list in osgeo4w installer
Hi, I notice the osgeo4w installer (I'm on windows 7) has some items repeated in the lib section of advanced install. I notice two times gdal17 gdal17-ecw gdal17-mrsid as items #8 and so on and the same repeated as items #82 of the same section. Apparently all seem work, but I don't think this is a good think. I don't know if and where report this situation. perhaps to the osgeo4w site ? Thx, Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Re:CAD Tools: icons not visible
Can anybody see the icons in other 64bit installations? All the best. In Win7 - 64bit installation from os4geo (qgis-dev) I see them. Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Re:CAD Tools: icons not visible
Il 25/12/2010 10:31, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto: Il giorno sab, 25/12/2010 alle 10.14 +0100, aperi2007 ha scritto: Can anybody see the icons in other 64bit installations? All the best. In Win7 - 64bit installation from os4geo (qgis-dev) I see them. Thanks - is this a real 64bit? All the best. The win7 I'm using is the 64bit version . Is a really 64bit version. But qgis-dev is the 32 bit version (from osgeo4 installer) Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Table geometryless ask an unique index int4
Hi, I'm try to test the geometryless capability of qgis. I'm see-ing qgis report an error because there were no columns in the table that are suitable as a qgis key (an unique index and int4 type). This is true, my table geometryless is without an int4 field. Meanwhile I know this is a must for a Geometry table I don't know if this still a must for a geometryless table or is a bug. Thx, Andrea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
