Re: [QGIS-Developer] Unable to build master on Ubuntu 22.04

2022-08-24 Thread Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer 

Hi Harrissou,

Recently our PDAL friends introduced in CMakeLists.txt:

set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 17)
set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD_REQUIRED ON)

For those compiling PDAL + GDAL + QGIS, maybe we need to use gcc-11. Is 
this you case?


Building QGIS and all required software works on my 22.04 (with gcc-11).

Best regards,

Jorge

On 24/08/22 11:33, Delaz J via QGIS-Developer wrote:

Hi devs,

I had a working build of QGIS master on ubuntu 22.04. Everything 
worked nicely but because it was minimum 2/3 weeks old, I pulled 
changes from upstream and tried to rebuild. Fail! I then deleted my 
build folder and redo a ccmake -G Ninja .., configured (no big changes 
other than Debug cmake_build_type, with_3D on and no GRASS) and 
launched the build. Still nothing. It just fails and I see no 
information why. Any idea how to fix or how I can output error reasons 
would be really appreciated.


Below all that I get.

Thanks and kind regards,

Harrissou

> ninja -j4 && ./output/bin/qgis
[9/1820] Building CXX object src/app/CMakeFiles/qgis_app.dir/qgisapp.cpp.o
FAILED: src/app/CMakeFiles/qgis_app.dir/qgisapp.cpp.o
ccache /usr/bin/c++ -DQT_3DCORE_LIB -DQT_3DEXTRAS_LIB -DQT_3DINPUT_LIB 
-DQT_3DLOGIC_LIB -DQT_3DRENDER_LIB -DQT_CONCURRENT_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB 
-DQT_DBUS_LIB -DQT_DEPRECATED_WARNINGS 
-DQT_DISABLE_DEPRECATED_BEFORE=0x050800 -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_NETWORK_LIB 
-DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII -DQT_NO_FOREACH -DQT_POSITIONING_LIB 
-DQT_PRINTSUPPORT_LIB -DQT_QMLMODELS_LIB -DQT_QML_LIB 
-DQT_QUICKWIDGETS_LIB -DQT_QUICK_LIB -DQT_SERIALPORT_LIB -DQT_SQL_LIB 
-DQT_SVG_LIB -DQT_UITOOLS_LIB -DQT_USE_QSTRINGBUILDER 
-DQT_WEBKITWIDGETS_LIB -DQT_WEBKIT_LIB -DQT_WIDGETS_LIB -DQT_XML_LIB 
-DSIP_VERSION=0x060501 
-DTEST_DATA_DIR=\"/media/delazj/github/QGIS/tests/testdata\" 
-DWITH_BINDINGS -DWITH_QTWEBKIT -Dqgis_app_EXPORTS 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/build-ninja/src/app/qgis_app_autogen/include 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/build-ninja 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/external/nmea 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/app 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/app/decorations 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/app/devtools/networklogger 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/app/labeling 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/app/layout 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/app/pluginmanager 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/app/gps 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/app/dwg 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/app/maptools 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/app/mesh 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/app/locator 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/app/pointcloud 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/app/vectortile 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/plugins 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/python 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/native 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/build-ninja/src/app 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/app/3d 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/build-ninja/src/core 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/3d 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/annotations 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/auth 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/browser 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/callouts 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/classification 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/diagram 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/dxf 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/editform 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/effects 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/elevation 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/expression 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/externalstorage 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/fieldformatter 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/geometry 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/geocms 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/geocms/geonode 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/geocoding 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/gps 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/labeling 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/layertree 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/layout 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/locator 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/maprenderer 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/mesh 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/metadata 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/network 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/numericformats 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/pal 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/plot 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/pointcloud 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/pointcloud/expression 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/processing 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/processing/models 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/proj 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/project 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/providers 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/providers/arcgis 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/providers/memory 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/providers/gdal 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/providers/ogr 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/providers/meshmemory 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/raster 
-I/media/delazj/github/QGIS/src/core/renderer

[QGIS-Developer] qgis.org/ubuntugis down or not responding

2024-04-21 Thread Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer 

Hi,

QGIS repos, like https://qgis.org/ubuntu or https://qgis.org/ubuntugis 
are not responding. The connection ends at cloudfare.com with timeout error.


Is it a problem on QGIS servers side or some cloudfare temporary issue?

Regards,

Jorge

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] qgis.org/ubuntugis down or not responding

2024-04-21 Thread Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer 
Thank you! 

On April 21, 2024 13:50:15 GMT+01:00, "Jürgen E. Fischer via QGIS-Developer" 
 wrote:
>Hi Jorge,
>
>On Sun, 21. Apr 2024 at 12:22:35 +0100, Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer 
>wrote:
>> QGIS repos, like https://qgis.org/ubuntu or https://qgis.org/ubuntugis are
>> not responding. The connection ends at cloudfare.com with timeout error.
> 
>> Is it a problem on QGIS servers side or some cloudfare temporary issue?
>
>qgis2.qgis.org was apparently dead.  Rebooted.  Builds restarted…
>
>
>Jürgen
>
>-- 
>Jürgen E. Fischer   norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31
>Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13  Fax. +49-4931-918175-50
>Software Engineer   D-26506 Nordenhttps://www.norbit.de
>QGIS release manager (PSC)  Germany IRC: jef on Libera|OFTC
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Maintainance of QGIS Plugin repository

2024-04-30 Thread Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer 

Hi Admire,

Thank you for helping with the plugins.

I think we can lower the administration time, if we can enable reviews 
by the users. Not just voting (that we already have), but written 
reviews. Written reviews can address issues you mentioned:


- Duplication of functionality. Plugin functionality already exists in QGIS.

- Plugins containing binaries (and related problems)

- Plugins which are a fork of an existing plugin

- Etc

As an example, Wordpress has about 60k plugins [1]. The submission 
process and rules are similar [2]. But the credibility about each plugin 
is mostly based on user's reviews, votes and number of downloads.


Basically, we already almost the same data as wordpress about plugins, 
but we miss user's reviews. User's reviews can add value.


What do you think?

Regards,

Jorge Gustavo

[1] https://wordpress.org/plugins/

[2] https://wordpress.org/plugins/developers/

On 30/04/24 21:38, Tim Sutton via QGIS-Developer wrote:

Hi Admire

Thanks for this! We can certainly task Lova with helping to streamline 
the process, implement better moderation tools etc. With regards to 
deleting plugins, I think we should take the approach that we in 
general do not physically delete things, rather we unpublish them with 
a flag that removes them from the plugins.xml, search on the plugins 
page etc. I think it would be prudent to maintain the chain of 
evidence in case we ever have a dispute or complaint about a plugin.


Regards

Tim

On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 2:41 PM Admire Nyakudya via QGIS-Developer 
 wrote:


Hi All

I help out in the approval process of QGIS plugins. There are
various issues that are listed
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Django/issues to streamline the
approval process of plugins.

Over the years there has been a steady increase in plugins that
are not approved .
This is due to a number of reasons:

* Duplication of functionality. Plugin functionality already
exists in QGIS.

* Plugin authors not willing to address issues raised during the
approval process.

* Plugins containing binaries (Not really sure about the policy here).

* Plugins which are a fork of an existing plugin and then they get
renamed to something else without permission from the original
author or the author is no longer interested i.e
https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/active_fire2/.

* Old plugins that still use the old architecture i.e Python2.

Could we either implement the following changes to
maintain/cleanup the plugin repository.

* Old plugins that were never approved because the author did not
care to resolve issues flagged be deleted from the repository i.e
https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/ban_adresse_locator/

* Plugins that have vague names and offer functionality that is
ambiguious i.e https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/upload/ be deleted.

* We could automate the deletion of plugins where feedback has
been received but the author hasn't done any corrective measure
maybe after a month or couple of months.

* Automatically flag the plugins which are not approved to
Deprecated after some time.

I think the above and other recommendations will encourage people
to use the plugin repository properly as currently it feels like a
dumping ground.


On a side note: What is the policy for plugin names. I know it is
up to the author to give his plugin a suitable name but something
like

https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/transfer_layerfilegdb_to_geopackage/#plugin-versions
looks like a description rather than a name.

Regards

Adire

-- 



  Admire Nyakudya

GIS Engineer

Work: Sand Technologies 

Location: Home Address 

Phone: +27 (63) 067-038--9982 

Email: add...@gmail.com

Social Media:

  * LinkedIn 
  * GitHub 

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



--
--
​

Tim Sutton
Kartoza Co-Founder
Visit http://kartoza.com to find out about open source:
 * Desktop GIS programming services
 * Geospatial web development
* GIS Training
* Consulting Services
Tim is a member of the QGIS Project Steering Committee
---

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info:https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Maintainance of QGIS Plugin repository

2024-05-02 Thread Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer 

Hi Tim,

We already have a problem managing plugins.

The situation will be no better in the future. My suggestion is not to 
add an additional problem, just to solve the current one. I understand 
your point and opening comments can be a problem. But can also add 
valuable information about the plugins. It is a tradeoff.


I would allow comments from authenticated users [1], without any 
moderation. The purpose is to get evaluations and feedback from several 
users, not from just one user. It works well, as far as I know, at 
Wordpress as I mentiones, and many more software with plugins.


It makes sense to be open text, to raise questions, security and privacy 
issues and point out features not available in any predefined list of 
options.


Maybe in the future we can discuss this again, when we have 10k plugins ;-)

Best regards,

Jorge

[1] Quote from GNOME Extensions: "Unfortunately, to help prevent spam, 
we require that you log in to GNOME Shell Extensions 
<https://extensions.gnome.org/accounts/login/> in order to post a 
comment or report an error. You understand, right?"


On 01/05/24 23:59, Tim Sutton wrote:

Hi Jorge!



On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:03 PM Jorge Gustavo Rocha via 
QGIS-Developer  wrote:


Hi Admire,

Thank you for helping with the plugins.

I think we can lower the administration time, if we can enable
reviews by the users. Not just voting (that we already have), but
written reviews. Written reviews can address issues you mentioned:

- Duplication of functionality. Plugin functionality already
exists in QGIS.

- Plugins containing binaries (and related problems)

- Plugins which are a fork of an existing plugin

- Etc

As an example, Wordpress has about 60k plugins [1]. The submission
process and rules are similar [2]. But the credibility about each
plugin is mostly based on user's reviews, votes and number of
downloads.

Basically, we already almost the same data as wordpress about
plugins, but we miss user's reviews. User's reviews can add value.

My concern here would be that we create a new problem: Having to 
moderate the comments. Maybe we could use a simple like/dislike and/or 
predefined lists of comments (e..g "Works great", "Doesnt work on 
Linux", "Doesnt work on macOS" etc.).


Regards

Tim


--
--

Tim Sutton
Kartoza Co-Founder
Visit http://kartoza.com to find out about open source:
 * Desktop GIS programming services
 * Geospatial web development
* GIS Training
* Consulting Services
Tim is a member of the QGIS Project Steering Committee
---___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Question about missing WMS TIME parameter in the documentation

2024-03-27 Thread Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer 

Hi Selma,

Thank you for the excellent work with the documentation.

I was checking QGIS Server documentation and the WMS parameter TIME is 
not mentioned.


The parameter is still valid and WMS queries can use TIME parameter, but 
there is no reference to it in the documentation.


I think it was there some time ago, but I'm not sure. I can update the 
documentation, if necessary, but first I would like to know why it 
disappeared (if it was there before).


You you aware of such modification?

Best regards,

Jorge Gustavo

On 05/01/24 16:19, Selma Vidimlic via QGIS-Developer wrote:

Hello all and happy new year,

Documentation writer report:

Merged pull requests:

  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/8713
  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/8721
  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/8723

Open pull requests:

  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/8764
  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/8765

Working on:

  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/issues/7545
  * Georeferencer chapter

Have a nice weekend,
Selma.

On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 at 16:51, Selma Vidimlic  wrote:

Hello all,

Here is the report for this week:

Merged pull requests:

  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/8701
  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/8702
  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/8708

Open pull requests:

  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/8713

Still working on:

  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/issues/7568
  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/issues/7545


Have a great weekend,
Selma.


On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 17:19, Selma Vidimlic  wrote:

Hello all,

Merged pull requests from this week:

  * 3D Tiles Chapter
 with
two commits from this week:

 1. fixes after review and update opening_data file


 2. cross references



  * Identify tool update


Open pull requests from this week:

  * Topology checker update

  * Auto-open options for exported layout


Regards,
Selma.

On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 at 19:48, Selma Vidimlic
 wrote:

Hi all,

Merged PR from this week:

  * Vector tiles update


Open PR:

  * 3d tiles
 -
so, here I need to additionally describe properties
(symbology, 3d view, elevation menu), also the second
section now is called *Scene, *but I believe this will
be changed. I'm looking forward to your feedback
(review).

Still working on:

  * geometry expressions


Have a nice weekend,
Selma.

On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 at 17:15, Selma Vidimlic
 wrote:

Hello everyone,

This week (and last week at the OSGeo meeting Vienna)
I was working on documentation for 3D Tiles in QGIS. I
used blog posts from Lutra Consulting and North Road
websites as the main source for the documentation,
also I followed video tutorials and Martin Dobias
explained 3D tiles to me while we were in Vienna. I'm
planning to create a draft version in my GitHub
repository (I will send you a link) so you can
check it out. This is my first time creating a whole
new chapter for documentation so I'm trying to be as
detailed as possible. I also prepared screenshots for
other chapters updates related to 3D tiles/Scene
(browser, data source management etc.).

PR from this week:
Vector tiles properties

In this PR I updated chapter with Source and Rendering
properties, but I wasn't able to recreate
OpenStreetMap landuse layer with all rules (like image
that is in the docs now), so if someone has advice on
how to do that, please let me

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Question about missing WMS TIME parameter in the documentation

2024-03-27 Thread Jorge Gustavo Rocha via QGIS-Developer 

Hi Selma,

Thank for the feedback. Seems like this TIME parameter never landed in 
the documentation.


I'll continue the discussion on top of the existent issue 
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/issues/7622


Regards,

Jorge

On 27/03/24 15:41, Selma Vidimlic wrote:


Hello Jorge,

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I must admit, I wasn't 
aware of the omission of the WMS TIME parameter from the QGIS Server 
documentation. My contributions to the server manual have been 
minimal, so I might not be the best person to provide a historical 
perspective on this matter. Harrissou, however, might have more 
insights regarding this.

I see that there is an open issue concerning the WMS TIME parameter:

  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/issues/7622

If you could, please open an issue on the documentation repository 
detailing the need for the inclusion of the TIME parameter. An 
explanation or example of how this parameter is used would be 
particularly helpful, at least for me :D


And of course, if you're comfortable making the change yourself, 
please feel free to do so. Either way, thank you for pointing this out.


Regards,
Selma.


On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 15:17, Jorge Gustavo Rocha  
wrote:


Hi Selma,

Thank you for the excellent work with the documentation.

I was checking QGIS Server documentation and the WMS parameter
TIME is not mentioned.

The parameter is still valid and WMS queries can use TIME
parameter, but there is no reference to it in the documentation.

I think it was there some time ago, but I'm not sure. I can update
the documentation, if necessary, but first I would like to know
why it disappeared (if it was there before).

You you aware of such modification?

Best regards,

Jorge Gustavo

On 05/01/24 16:19, Selma Vidimlic via QGIS-Developer wrote:

Hello all and happy new year,

Documentation writer report:

Merged pull requests:

  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/8713
  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/8721
  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/8723

Open pull requests:

  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/8764
  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/8765

Working on:

  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/issues/7545
  * Georeferencer chapter

Have a nice weekend,
Selma.

On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 at 16:51, Selma Vidimlic 
wrote:

Hello all,

Here is the report for this week:

Merged pull requests:

  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/8701
  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/8702
  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/8708

Open pull requests:

  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/8713

Still working on:

  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/issues/7568
  * https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/issues/7545


Have a great weekend,
Selma.


On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 17:19, Selma Vidimlic
 wrote:

Hello all,

Merged pull requests from this week:

  * 3D Tiles Chapter
 with
two commits from this week:

 1. fixes after review and update opening_data file


 2. cross references



  * Identify tool update


Open pull requests from this week:

  * Topology checker update

  * Auto-open options for exported layout


Regards,
Selma.

On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 at 19:48, Selma Vidimlic
 wrote:

Hi all,

Merged PR from this week:

  * Vector tiles update


Open PR:

  * 3d tiles
 -
so, here I need to additionally describe
properties (symbology, 3d view, elevation menu),
also the second section now is called *Scene,
*but I believe this will be changed. I'm looking
forward to your feedback (review).

Still working on:

  * geometry expressions