Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

[Norman Dunbar]

Evening Phoebus,

 The proper solution for uQLx is for the graphics parts to be abstracted
 and maybe use SDL or something along the same lines, something that will
 enable native compilation under Windoze, MacOS etc.
That would most likely be QT - in my opinion of course, other opinions
are available - but may be wrong! ;-)

http://www.qtsoftware.com
is the place to go for a free development system that works (natively)
on Windows, Mac, Linux and Unix.


Cheers,
Norman.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

[Phoebus R. Dokos]

Norman Dunbar wrote:
 Evening Phoebus,

   
Hi Norman,
QT would be a good choice for the higher level as would GTK (Qt though
just got stable bindings for mono... therefore I vote GTK -for the time
being-). Of course porting the graphics part is the least of one's
worries when porting to Windoze:-P )

Phoebus
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm