RE: ezmlm-make -+ -x? (Was: bonussouzaramos)]
I agree with Robin and Herman on this one to Can we just hunt down and skin all the exchange server lusers using there stupid Panda Scan and other crapware? I am really getting tired of these stupid warning messages. Yes i know its a virus and NO i am not a fucking retard like one of your lame ass users was to open it and infect everyone in there address book. Jps -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Herman Van Keer Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 8:07 AM To: qmail mailing list Subject: Re: ezmlm-make -+ -x? (Was: bonussouzaramos)] Stupid of me, but forgot to reply to the list: "Robin S. Socha" wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 04:05:36PM -0300, Wilson wrote: > > Hi! How are you? > > Pretty good, thank you. Okay, so Dan is God. That's fine. But I wonder > if running ezmlm-idx would not be beneficial to the list. No HTML, no > v-cards, no Windows crap. *sigh* Please, please, please? You know Robin... You can be a tough guy, but this time *with* you: PLEASE... PLEASE... PLEASE Herman
RE: Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD
*BSD ! = Does NOT equal linux -Original Message- From: Karsten W. Rohrbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 12:40 PM To: David T. Ashley Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD David T. Ashley([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.07.02 12:46:24 +: > You were right, and I was wrong. > > The 2G limit is now removed as of kernel 2.4.x. *BSD != Linux /k > > Dave. > > -Original Message- > From: Karsten W. Rohrbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 10:05 AM > To: David T. Ashley > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Solaris vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD > > > David T. Ashley([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.06.27 20:42:50 +: > > If Free BSD breaks the 2G limit, I'd go with Free BSD. > > what 2g limit? > /k > > -- > > Love does not make the world go around, just up and down a bit. > KR433/KR11-RIPE -- WebMonster Community Founder -- nGENn GmbH Senior Techie > http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- > http://www.ngenn.net/ > karsten&rohrbach.de -- alpha&ngenn.net -- alpha&scene.org -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 > BF46 > Please do not remove my address from To: and Cc: fields in mailing lists. > 10x > -- > God must love assholes --She made so many of them. KR433/KR11-RIPE -- WebMonster Community Founder -- nGENn GmbH Senior Techie http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.net/ karsten&rohrbach.de -- alpha&ngenn.net -- alpha&scene.org -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46 Please do not remove my address from To: and Cc: fields in mailing lists. 10x
Re: Where I can get vmailmgr-0.96-9.tar.gz.
error on my part. I made the assumption it was part of the inter7 software. thanks Jps - Original Message - From: "peter green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 12:38 PM Subject: Re: Where I can get vmailmgr-0.96-9.tar.gz. > * Jeremy Suo-Anttila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010630 12:58]: > > Why not get it from the people who write the software? Try www.inter7.com > > they write all the programs like vpopmail, vmailmger etc etc > > Inter7 doesn't write vmailmgr. Bruce Guenter does. > > See [http://vmailmgr.org/], though it appears to be wacked right now. > > /pg > -- > Peter Green : Architekton Internet Services, LLC : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- > lp1 on fire > (One of the more obfuscated kernel messages) > >
Re: Where I can get vmailmgr-0.96-9.tar.gz.
or even better try http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail/vpopmail-book.html You can find info and sources for all the programs there and a howto by the programs authors. thanks Jps - Original Message - From: "Lukas Beeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jeremy Suo-Anttila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 12:01 PM Subject: Re: Where I can get vmailmgr-0.96-9.tar.gz. > because it's much simpler for me to search with google, instead remembering > all URL's of different organisations with also different program names :] > of course, vmailmgr.org was the first i tried, but there was a sweet > permission denied message, which made me to look at google.com > > At 11:59 30.06.2001 -0500, Jeremy Suo-Anttila wrote: > >Why not get it from the people who write the software? Try www.inter7.com > >they write all the programs like vpopmail, vmailmger etc etc > > > >thanks > > > >Jps > > > >- Original Message - > >From: "Lukas Beeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 11:39 AM > >Subject: Re: Where I can get vmailmgr-0.96-9.tar.gz. > > > > > > > Quick google search shows: > > > http://freezer-burn.org/rpm-c.php?rpm=vmailmgr > > > http://chroot.net/software/bgware/vmailmgr/vmailmgr-0.96.9.tar.gz > > > ... > > > and remember: > > > google.com is your friend > > > > > > At 17:14 30.06.2001 +0200, Webmaster Sports-wear.de wrote: > > > > > > >I need this Programm as soon as possible. > > > > > > > >Can anybody send me this little programm through email ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Thanks > > > > > > -- > > > -- > > > Lukas Beeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Homepage: http://www.projectdream.org > > > -- > > > > > > > >
Re: Where I can get vmailmgr-0.96-9.tar.gz.
Why not get it from the people who write the software? Try www.inter7.com they write all the programs like vpopmail, vmailmger etc etc thanks Jps - Original Message - From: "Lukas Beeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 11:39 AM Subject: Re: Where I can get vmailmgr-0.96-9.tar.gz. > Quick google search shows: > http://freezer-burn.org/rpm-c.php?rpm=vmailmgr > http://chroot.net/software/bgware/vmailmgr/vmailmgr-0.96.9.tar.gz > ... > and remember: > google.com is your friend > > At 17:14 30.06.2001 +0200, Webmaster Sports-wear.de wrote: > > >I need this Programm as soon as possible. > > > >Can anybody send me this little programm through email ? > > > > > > > >Thanks > > -- > -- > Lukas Beeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Homepage: http://www.projectdream.org > -- > >
RE: qmail Installation
Yes get a new OS or listen to Charles arrggh From: Steve Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 6:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: qmail Installation Someone just sent me a note and said they were able to install qmail without a problem on Mandrake 8. I just downloaded the very latest ISOs and qmail still won't install for me. So, assuming that I must be doing something totally asinine, here is exactly, step by step, what I am doing. Hopefully some kind soul can read this and tell me what I'm doing wrong: 1. Download the qmail compressed file into the /usr/local/src directory. 2. Decompress the file, creating /usr/local/src/qmail-1.03. 3. Create the /var/qmail directory (yes I'm logged on as root). 4. Modify INSTALL.ids using the first section for Linux. It does create the users and groups. 5. Do a "make setup check" in the /usr/local/src/qmail-1.03 directory. It runs and is busy compiling. 6. When compile is finished, the /var/qmail directory is still empty. So, when I try to do the ./config it of course errors out because it can't find the right directories in /var/qmail. Soany ideas? -Steve
RE: GHOSTS AND ASSHOLES (OT)
Ok now i am confused WTF is Robin? Male? Female? 86 Year Old Hermaphidite east Dallas Whore? Throw me a bone here please. Thanks Russell Russ Rus Russel or whatever it is for all your help. Jps
Re: [Q] CPU usage -- Too busy
You have something seriously wrong for it to be taking that many resources on my FreeBSD boxes i still have yet to reach 2% of my cpu usage. Lose the stupid app and open a console and use the top command instead it wont lie to you. Just my .02 jps From: "YOON, Joo-Yung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:13 PM Subject: [Q] CPU usage -- Too busy > I just installed qmail, ucspi-tcp, and daemontaols under directions > of lwq. > > Now the system shows 100% of CPU usage on the window of wmcube (a small > display application in WindowMaker, which shows the CPU rate.) > > And the load average is also full on the window of wmload (WindowMaker App.). > > I wonder if supervise takes all the resources, and that is why. > Couldn't it run as quiet as other daemons? > > Joo-Yung >
RE: Spam Removal
Please let know if you find a way to block all of the domains you mentioned. Also do you think someone like arin.net would have there blocks of ips on file and then we can just block them ? Thanks Jps From: Ed Weinberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 10:13 AM Subject: Re: Spam Removal On Sun, 17 Jun 2001 17:13:51 -0500, "Jeremy Suo-Anttila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I have already done this and yes i do have pop b4 smtp setup and running so >i am not asking about me being a relay as some people on the list think. >Does anyone know a good how to or site where i can get info on rejecting all >mail that is not addressed directly to me or my users ? Sounds like you have a "default" mailbox set up. Just remove that mailbox and make sure each user has a .qmail file and those messages will be bounce. As to denying the servers they are using, I have been watching them. They originate from a different address that traced to .kr or .cn or some other unfriendly country, so you can't email their provider to turn them off. They also relay from a different relay each time. Every time they start these campaigns I get their spam for a few days, then every email address on their list gets 10 times the spam for a while. I am considering screening out ALL .cn and .kr mailservers. Is there an easy way to do that? Ed Weinberg, Q5 Comm, LLC. [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel 914-713-7222 fax 914-713-7227 Connecting you to the internet...
Re: Spam Removal
I have already done this and yes i do have pop b4 smtp setup and running so i am not asking about me being a relay as some people on the list think. Does anyone know a good how to or site where i can get info on rejecting all mail that is not addressed directly to me or my users ? ie so if it get mail like i did earlier that was sent to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It will just delete it or send it to a bulk mail folder ? I know that hotmail and excite have features like this so it should be possible i belive . Thanks Again Jps > Jeremy Suo-Anttila wrote: > > > > I keep getting sent SPAM from this company based in CA trying to sell me a > > MasterDisc 2000 which i know is a scam i have followed all there procedures > > to remove my domains from there lists and they went and actaully added them > > and more to there lists so i ave been getting flooded with there crap mails. > > I have faxed in removal requests, emailed them, phoned them and they still > > will not remove my domains. Any suggestions on what i can do ? I would like > > to setup some sort of spam removal but i would also if possible like to take > > some sort of legal action. > > Ahh . . . if only we could sue them, think of the money to be had there. > In all seriousness, just throw their mail server's IP address/block into > your tcpservers' rules with a deny parameter. > > -- > Nick (Keith) Fish > Network Engineer > Triton Technologies, Inc. >
Spam Removal
I keep getting sent SPAM from this company based in CA trying to sell me a MasterDisc 2000 which i know is a scam i have followed all there procedures to remove my domains from there lists and they went and actaully added them and more to there lists so i ave been getting flooded with there crap mails. I have faxed in removal requests, emailed them, phoned them and they still will not remove my domains. Any suggestions on what i can do ? I would like to setup some sort of spam removal but i would also if possible like to take some sort of legal action. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. And i have pasted a header from one of there mails below. > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 10844 invoked by uid 98); 17 Jun 2001 16:02:45 - Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 10842 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2001 16:02:44 - Received: from tth.taiyo-toy.co.jp (HELO www.taiyo-toy.co.jp) (210.225.132.20) by ns1.ideathcare.com with SMTP; 17 Jun 2001 16:02:44 - Received: from ..! .. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:09:02 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MasterCD 2001 - Customer Sources > I know that replying to them will not work since the obvious are not a legitimate company. Why else would they use yahoo.com and excite.com email addresses for there return. I just do not see where i can block out there IP with my TCP Server. every letter i get from them is a different source account. Thanks Jeremy Suo-Anttila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: error qmail
A good howto on setting up Qmail on FreeBSD 3* / 4* is available here. I have used it on 5 servers and have yet to have any problems http://howto.globelinks.com/qmail-howto-freebsd.html Thanks Jps - Original Message - From: "budsz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 6:57 AM Subject: error qmail > Hi... > > When i compiled qmail in FreeBSD 4.2 ,i got some message "multilog: > fatal: unable to lock directory /var/log/qmail: temporary failure" > > what is that mean? and how i can resolve that. > > BTW where i can find URL/e-books for install qmail in FreeBSD. > > TIA > > > budsz >
RE: url of sqwebmail too long!!!!
Why not just use a http refresh and point to the correct url thats what i have done and it only takes a few seconds to do. http://webmail.yourdomain.com/cgi-bin/sqwebmail";> thanks Jps -Original Message- From: Troy Settle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 9:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: url of sqwebmail too long How about: RewriteRule ^/$ /cgi-bin/sqwebmail [R] In your apache configuration. -Troy ** -Original Message- ** From: Johan Almqvist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ** Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 9:35 AM ** To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Subject: Re: url of sqwebmail too long ** ** ** * Massimo Quintini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010608 09:45]: ** > How can I use an URL short (like mail.te.astro.it) instead of ** > mail.te.astro.it/cgi-bin/sqwebmail ** > I have tried with VirtualHost directive of Apache Web Server without ** > success!!! ** ** I've found the easiest way to be the following: ** ** Using lynx, grab the front page (login page) that sqwebmail ** sends. Save it ** as index.html of a virtual host (ie mail.te.astro.it/index.html). Make ** sure the links and the form point to the cgi. Voilà! ** ** -Johan ** -- ** Johan Almqvist ** http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/ **
RE: [OT] qmail & php
I have a machine with apache_mod_ssl+php4+mod_jk and the MTA is qmail and i have yet to have any problems using php scripts on it. I am using a FreeBSD 4.1.1 Box and for the sendmail mailwrapper i used this If the system undergoes a 'make world', its going to replace the sendmail link to /var/qmail/bin/sendmail, qmail and break the package. Dj-vapor kindly pointed out that linking to the qmail's sendmail binary at/var/qmail/bin/sendmail is a not the best solution, there's an even more fun way of doing it. He suggests using mailwrapper to link to qmail's sendmail binary. First we'll link the old sendmail binary to mailwrapper. Lastly, we'll edit /etc/mail/mailer.conf and replace the old sendmail binary locations with qmail's sendmail binary. # ln -s /usr/sbin/sendmail /usr/sbin/mailwrapper # pico -w /etc/mail/mailer.conf Replace the following lines: sendmail /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail send-mail /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail mailq /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail newaliases /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail With: sendmail /var/qmail/bin/sendmail # send-mail /var/qmail/bin/sendmail -bp # mailq /var/qmail/bin/sendmail # newaliases /var/qmail/bin/newaliases If you want more information on mailwrapper, then type the line below on your FreeBSD machine.: # man mailwrapper If you don't want to use mailwrapper, then you can simply link the old sendmail binary to qmail's sendmail binary using one of the methods below Good Luck Jps -Original Message- From: Gordon McDowall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:50 AM To: Bill Andersen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OT] qmail & php I have a machine with php and qmail on it, but I can't remember which I installed first ;o( I will put a php form script on if you like to test it - Original Message - From: "Bill Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 3:28 PM Subject: [OT] qmail & php > When I installed qmail, I obviously removed sendmail. Now > when I build php(4) and try to use the the mail() function, > I get "mail() not supported in this PHP build" because > sendmail was not found during the configure (I assume). > > The only reference I could find in the php archives was to > put "sendmail_path=", but it didn't > work. > > Has anyone had any luck using php with qmail? > > Please reply off-list as I realize this is really a php issue. > The php mailing list is down per their web site, but I > figure someone on this list is bound to be running php... > > (Sorry!) > > ./bill > > BTW: RH7, php4<->apache >
RE: High Availability, High Volume and NFS
Unleash the daemon! ;) -Original Message- From: Mark Delany [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 2:12 PM To: Qmail List Subject: Re: High Availability, High Volume and NFS I don't want to start an OS war, but if you want to use NFS on an Intel box, I strongly suggest one of the BSDs. I was in a situation where I had to use Linux NFS servers - that was until they failed miserabled. They were replaced with FreeBSD and the problems went away. Regards. On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:40:13PM -0500, Duane Schaub allegedly wrote: > > I want to set up multiple qmail machines to access an NFS backend. We have > about 10,000 users (running maildir) and an average of 5 emails/user/dat and > av. 10K in size. On average, there are 6 simultaneous pop sessions with > approx. 200 new sessions/min. > > We have tried a Redhat6.1 backend on the NFS with Redhat 6.1 NFS clients. > The result was that the qmail machines were BARELY able to keep up. If > there were any pauses on the NFS server, the POP sessions would build to > 50-60 very quickly with qmail crashing at about 300 sessions. Once qmail > exceeded about 70 sessions, it was beyond the point of return and would not > recover. > > The NFS server was nothing special (P350/IDE 256Mb RAM). We also tried a > Dell 2300 (Dual 400/RAID5) NT server running Intergraph NFS But the > performance was abysmal! Performing an ls in a user/new directory took 21 > seconds for a response. > > I think NFS would work, but I don't really want a Netapp F5 ($50,000). What > NFS experiences are out there? > > If you wish - respond privately [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Duane. > > > > President, | Terra World, Inc. > Terra World, Inc.| 200 ARCO Place, Suite 252 > (888)332-1616| Independence, KS 67301 > (620)332-1616| When your work counts, Use > www.terraworld.net |T E R R A W O R L D > > >
RE: OT - Problems with daemontools 0.70
bluefish can also do everything and anything editors like Homesite can do. Highlighting code etc etc. >From: Hubbard, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 1:12 PM vim (Vi IMproved) will do syntax highlighting of html and based on the highlighting, if this guy can match the colors up, he'll know he closed all his tags correctly. :-) Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 1:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - Problems with daemontools 0.70 >> a html development program with: >> code verification Code verification for html?? Come on... >> syntax verification and highlighting Ok, Ok, I'll give you the highlighting part - but if you've written enough html with a real editor, you can get an idea of how it's going to look be viewing the markup. HTML is NOT code It is a markup language!! .mark
Re: smpp instead of smtp
Q: What is SMPP? A: The Short Message Peer to Peer (SMPP) protocol is an open industry standard messaging protocol designed to simplify integration of data applications with wireless mobile networks such as GSM, TDMA, CDMA and PDC. The protocol is widely deployed in the mobile telecommunications industry. The SMPP protocol specification is freely available from the Documents section of this site. http://www.smpp.org/faq2.htm#Q1 - Original Message - From: "Peter van Dijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 2:06 AM Subject: Re: smpp instead of smtp > On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 01:18:14AM -0400, alexus wrote: > > whats smpp? > > It appears to be SMS related. They want my personal data for providing > me the specs (www.smpp.org) so I didn't download those. > > Greetz, Peter. >
RE: slow smtp connection
if you break it up then the newbies will just post to both lists. -Original Message- From: dan.kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 1:58 PM To: Brett Randall; Charles Cazabon Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: slow smtp connection or how about breaking up the list to qmail-newbiesand qmail-arch, or somthing similar? i know this has been suggested before. dan On Tue, 01 May 2001, Brett Randall wrote: > > "Charles" == Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > A note to potential qmail newbies: we'll help you. Honestly. You > > just have to promise to do your homework, give it an honest try > > before asking for help, and to post good problem reports (detailing > > what you did, what the system did, and what you thought it was going > > to do instead, with complete logs and contents of control files). > > If you're not willing to promise that much, you will receive nothing > > but beatings for your pains, in this list, or anywhere else in life > > for that matter. > > Why isn't this type of message in the qmail-subscribe auto-generated > reply? I have suggested this many times myself, and seen many other > people suggest it as well. Simply pointing out this kind of thing and > linking to the major sources of documentation would save a bundle of > time and emotion. Of course, one could also point out that having the > list message-moderated with a couple of good moderators in a couple of > opposing timezones would significantly increase the signal to noise > ratio. > -- > "Pascal, n.: A programming language named after a man who would turn over > in his grave if he knew about it." > > - The Chartered Institution of C Programmers
Re: max concurrency for qmail is 500, what's it for sendmail?
whats this sleep stuff and where can i get some ? - Original Message - From: "James Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Markus Stumpf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 7:55 PM Subject: Re: max concurrency for qmail is 500, what's it for sendmail? Laugh... No Stress is when you wake up screaming and realize it wasn't the phone ringing with that irritating customer you hate so much.. Then you realize as you wide the sweat of your forehead that your not even at work!! If anyone can agree with that say 'hell ya!' --JT >> Original Message << On 4/25/01, 5:18:57 PM, Markus Stumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re: max concurrency for qmail is 500, what's it for sendmail?: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:11:46AM +, James Stevens wrote: > > Anyways theres my two cents .. Now I go home and sleep (trying to > > remember what that word actually means) > Lack of caffeine? > SCNR, but I can understand what you mean ... (see my .sig) > Have a good night! > \Maex > -- > SpaceNet AG| Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0 > Research & Development | D-80807 Muenchen| Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 > Stress is when you wake up screaming and you realize you haven't fallen > asleep yet.
Re: Antigen found W32/Navidad.e@M (McAfee4,CA(InoculateIT)) virus
turn off your stupid virus notification its mail bombing the listserver and wasting peoples time and bandwidth - Original Message - From: "ANTIGEN_ITMAILMAN2" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 9:51 PM Subject: Antigen found W32/Navidad.e@M (McAfee4,CA(InoculateIT)) virus > Antigen for Exchange found Emanuel.exe infected with W32/Navidad.e@M > (McAfee4,CA(InoculateIT)) virus. > The file is currently Detected. The message, "Fw: How to block an email id > in qmail?", was > sent from Forrest Sutton and was discovered in McKenzie, Andrew\#apps\qmail > located at Brite/MANCHESTER/ITMAILMAN2. >
RE: Maildir (dir) to file for /var/mail/$USR (Inbox) [imapd]
Dont mind Robin he just has a very large tree firmly stuffed up his ass. -Original Message- From: alexus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 2:29 PM To: Robin S. Socha; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Maildir (dir) to file for /var/mail/$USR (Inbox) [imapd] i'm not talking for microsoft products only i'm talking about most popular clients such as microsoft outlook, netscape, eudora and i'm sure many many more... they all broken?? yeah right.. let's blame everyone.. if you can't help with this issue don't post your "not happy" email here.. i'm going use whatever i feel like to so you can do yourself format c: and install ms exchange i'm happy to use what i'm using which part of *that* dont you understand? and as for topic my original issue was to make qmail w/ maildir to be accesable to most popular e-mail clients and i've been suggested to use courier imapd.. so we still on same topic.. mean while if you dont like it don't delete it and/or don't read it! - Original Message - From: "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 2:44 PM Subject: Re: Maildir (dir) to file for /var/mail/$USR (Inbox) [imapd] > * alexus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010417 14:34]: > > if i set *client* correctly?? > > Which part of "everything Microsoft has ever produced is fucked up > beyond recognition" have you not understood, "alexus"? > > > that's the thing i dont want to deal with users wasting my time by > > explaining how to set up their e-mail clients! everything should work > > with default settings. > > Which part of "Outlook is broken" have you not understood? > > > define "properly configured client"? is there some syntax that i should use > > or something? > > format c: > > > i'm going try courier imapd now.. > > w/ --enable-workarounds-for-imap-client-bugs > > let's see how is that goin help me.. > > It is going to introduce broken behaviour into an otherwise perfect IMAP > server. And just in case you haven't noticed yet: you are *off* *topic*. > None of your problems have to do with qmail. Being incompetent and using > broken software have nothing to do with qmail. Get MS Exchange. >
qmail-qread qmail-qstat
I am trying to find out what mail is in my queue and who it is from / going to. I read through the man pages on qmail-qstat and qmail-qread but they are not very infomative. I was wondering if anyone out there that might know a good URL for this or a better way for me to do this. here is a small snip of my qmail-qread results doneremote [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( i am assuming this is a successfull delivery) remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] (this one i have no idea) 2 Apr 2001 01:03:20 GMT #220462 1941 remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] (this one i am assumming is a bounce waiting for a retry) Thanks Jps [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: inquire
yes this is very easy to do. find the .qmail-x for the email address you are trying to redirect and then simply add your second email address to it. Once you open the file and look at you will see its very simple to do. i.e .qmail-abuse file contents &[EMAIL PROTECTED] &[EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Jps > all mails sent by the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] will have an automatic > cc copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? is this possible? > > >
Logging
I would like to be able to log all subscriptions and un-subscriptions on my list. right now it is a basic ezmlm-idx list on a freebsd 4.1 box. I tried to look thru the .qmail files to see if I could add my email address to one of them but I could not find the one that handles the unsub/sub commands. any help with this would be appreciated. Thanks Jeremy Suo-Anttila [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://funeralWire.com Your Leading Source For Death Care Industry News.
RE: MAIL FROM: <#@[]>
I have seen the same entries in my logs and i traced it back to be a perl form script i use as a contact form on a webpage i host that was causing the MAIL FROM: <#@[]> in my logs thanks Jps -Original Message- From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 2:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MAIL FROM: <#@[]> "Jamin A. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I'm noticing a fair amount of spam coming into our system where the >sending server is using MAIL FROM: <#@[]>. Really? Where's it coming from? Sure you're not seeing this in double bounces? -Dave
RE: Repeated Identical Messages
I have had the repeated msg problem with some of the users on my ezmlm-idx managed list. I had one user tell me he got the same newsletter 12 times from me. Has anyone found a solution to this yet ? Thanks Jeremy Suo-Anttila
Re: DNS Patch Unavailable
all you need to do to fix the dns problem is change a setting in your dns.c source for qmail change the word "PACKETZ" to "65536" this is according to running Qmail by sams publishing. i have hacked this code a few times with 0 problems on 5 of my servers thanks Jps > For several days, I have attempted to download the patch that is > at http://www.ckdhr.com/ckd/qmail-103.patch but the server www.ckdhr.com > has not been responding at all. > > Is this patch available from any other locations or mirror sites? > > -- > John Evans > > >
Re: What's qmail 2.0 bugtraq is talking about?
the only exploits i could find about qmail is the one that djb wrote himself. Can you tell me what string you used for the search or post the url thanks Jps - Original Message - From: "Davi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 7:03 PM Subject: What's qmail 2.0 bugtraq is talking about? > Hi guys, > > A search about qmail in bugtraq (www.securityfocus.com) returned me a DoS > about lots of RCPTs. I tried the exploits and qmail stayed alive. > First of all, is this vulnerability true? > > And more strange. Why was this bugtraq entry updated this month to say that > qmail 2.0 is also vulnerable? Wtf is this qmail 2.0? > > []s > Davi >
Re: checkpassowrd and FreeBSD
delete that port tree and then cvsup again you may also need to get the latest upgrade patch for the newest ports man cvsup Jps - Original Message - From: "Ricardo Cerqueira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 5:43 PM Subject: Re: checkpassowrd and FreeBSD
Re: Qmail slow!
http://howto.globelinks.com/qmail-howto-freebsd.html try looking there for a nice howto on Qmail+FreeBSD 4.* Jps - Original Message - From: "Schiffbauer, Anthony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Dave Sill'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 1:50 PM Subject: RE: Qmail slow! > Hi dave, > it was already installed on there when I was handed the box. I tried to > reinstall by looking at this: > Qmail Linux howto http://ww.skyinet.net/~onogos/docs/Qmail-HOWTO > > Now, I know it says Linux, but I figure it couldnt be too different. > > -Original Message- > From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 1:53 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Qmail slow! > > > "Schiffbauer, Anthony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >thanks! umm.. I am trying to look at the logs. I cant find them. Where are > >they? > > Where'd you tell them to go? If you don't know that, then tell us how > you installed qmail and we'll tell you where to look for the logs. > > -Dave >
Importing Emails into ezmlm-idx
anyone know how i can import 350 email addy's from a text file into ezmlm ? thanks Jps
HTML Emails Garbled when sent with qmail+ezmlm
I have been having a problem with HTML based emails getting garlbled when i send them out via qmail+ezmlm-idx most of the messages go out fine and have 0 problems while some will go out to random users on my list and they will be completely garlbled and most likely unreadable to the end user. I have attached the copies of the HTML I used.Tthe first link is the version that turned out fine with no problems when sent and the second is the exact same code as the first but was forwarded to me by a client who recieved it all garbled. http://dev.funeralwire.com/today.htm http://dev.funeralwire.com/today-bad.htm I am composing this message in Dreamweaver 4.0 and then Sending it out with Netscape 6.0 i have also been telling it not to embed the images into the emails and to pull them of remote www servers instead. This problem does not happen everytime i send out a mail and it also does not affect the same users everytime. I can send a user who received the email all garbled directly from my client and it will come through with out a hitch. and i have all tried setting up a test list on the same server with some of the users who recieved it garbled and i sent out the same email and it came through ok. I am really stumped here and i would appreciate any input. There was one small problem i having with the NIC on the server itself but i do not think it is the cause of the problem. When ever i send out the mail via ezmlm i get this error sometimes in my log files and dmesg Jan 31 19:02:23 ns1 /kernel: file: table is fullJan 31 19:02:23 ns1 last message repeated 112 timesJan 31 19:02:28 ns1 /kernel: dc0: watchdog timeoutJan 31 19:02:37 ns1 /kernel: dc0: watchdog timeoutJan 31 19:02:38 ns1 /kernel: dc0: no memory for tx listJan 31 19:02:38 ns1 /kernel: dc0: no memory for tx listJan 31 19:13:21 ns1 syslogd: exiting on signal 15 I am replacing the server right now and i am transfering it to a more power full machine with a better nic ( no more dc0 ) thanks Jeremy Suo-Anttila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
