Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
Sam, et. al. I would say that to get the best results out of SPAMDYKE, you DEFINITELY want *IT* to handle the TLS. My reasoning is 2-fold: 1) I have an average of 15% of incoming SPAM that is attaching with TLS (I thought this was odd, but apparently not) 2) I require TLS for my outbound mail (from my clients) and THEY TOO can be sources of SPAM. I'd like SPAMDYKE to equally fight inbound AND outbound SPAM! Just my thoughts. They were free to you, so take them at their face value. Daniel McAllister, President IT4SOHO, LLC Take my advice... I won't be using it today! Sam Clippinger wrote: Actually, enabling TLS in spamdyke is the best solution. When spamdyke handles the TLS, the remote server can't tell the difference -- if it was using TLS before, it should continue to do so. However, because spamdyke decrypts the traffic, it can enable all of its filters (including graylisting, recipient blacklisting, etc). If spamdyke simply passes TLS traffic through without decrypting it, most of its filters cannot operate. -- Sam Clippinger Davide Bozzelli wrote: Sam Clippinger ha scritto: OK, I should be able to duplicate that setup to see if I can reproduce your error. It may be a little while before I have the time, however. In the meantime, can you try enabling TLS support in spamdyke to see if this error persists? Inside spamdyke, TLS passthrough is handled differently than TLS decoding. If this is a spamdyke bug, you may be able to work around it. Enabling TLS support will also allow all of spamdyke's filters to function, including graylisting. To enable TLS, you'll need to compile spamdyke with TLS support and use the tls-certificate-file directive in the configuration file. Your TLS certificate is probably located at: /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem -- Sam Clippinger I can confirm this bug, i've have the exact problems with a qmail patched with jms combined patch that sends mail to a qmailtoaster with spamdyke enabled without tls. By enabling tls in spamdyke the problem went down, but it's not the correct way of work, cause the source mta don't do any tls handshake. Have fun, Davide - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
I agree spamdyke should handle the TLS so all of its filters can be used (including graylisting). However, spamdyke can't filter outbound mail. Anything that's generated on your server (e.g. webmail users) will bypass spamdyke entirely. Anything that's sent through your server (e.g. your users' MUAs using your server as their SMTP host) will/should be whitelisted or authenticated. Granted, you _can_ setup spamdyke to filter mail generated by your users' MUAs but you won't like it -- you'll get a lot of angry phone calls. -- Sam Clippinger Dan McAllister wrote: Sam, et. al. I would say that to get the best results out of SPAMDYKE, you DEFINITELY want *IT* to handle the TLS. My reasoning is 2-fold: 1) I have an average of 15% of incoming SPAM that is attaching with TLS (I thought this was odd, but apparently not) 2) I require TLS for my outbound mail (from my clients) and THEY TOO can be sources of SPAM. I'd like SPAMDYKE to equally fight inbound AND outbound SPAM! Just my thoughts. They were free to you, so take them at their face value. Daniel McAllister, President IT4SOHO, LLC Take my advice... I won't be using it today! Sam Clippinger wrote: Actually, enabling TLS in spamdyke is the best solution. When spamdyke handles the TLS, the remote server can't tell the difference -- if it was using TLS before, it should continue to do so. However, because spamdyke decrypts the traffic, it can enable all of its filters (including graylisting, recipient blacklisting, etc). If spamdyke simply passes TLS traffic through without decrypting it, most of its filters cannot operate. -- Sam Clippinger Davide Bozzelli wrote: Sam Clippinger ha scritto: OK, I should be able to duplicate that setup to see if I can reproduce your error. It may be a little while before I have the time, however. In the meantime, can you try enabling TLS support in spamdyke to see if this error persists? Inside spamdyke, TLS passthrough is handled differently than TLS decoding. If this is a spamdyke bug, you may be able to work around it. Enabling TLS support will also allow all of spamdyke's filters to function, including graylisting. To enable TLS, you'll need to compile spamdyke with TLS support and use the tls-certificate-file directive in the configuration file. Your TLS certificate is probably located at: /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem -- Sam Clippinger I can confirm this bug, i've have the exact problems with a qmail patched with jms combined patch that sends mail to a qmailtoaster with spamdyke enabled without tls. By enabling tls in spamdyke the problem went down, but it's not the correct way of work, cause the source mta don't do any tls handshake. Have fun, Davide - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Can't get clamav-toaster to install
CentOS5, ASUS P5GC-MX/1333 MB, 1 Gig RAM, Pentium Core2 Duo 6550. Running the instal script I just get to the end where it says: Preparing... [100%] 1:clamav-toaster [100%] The it hangs. If I rebuild it manually and try to run it with rpm -i, I don't get the above, I just get the hang as soon as I hit enter. If I hit ctrl-c I get: error: %post(clamav-toaster-0.92-1.3.16.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 If I then try to verify the package I get: S.5...GT c /etc/freshclam.conf The system seems to think it is installed, but if reboot, the boot process hangs when trying to start freshclam. If I disable freshclam at startup and then manually start it after logging in, it seems to work fine. Oh and also, I can't seem to get to the qmailadmin webpage. It seems it installed under /usr/share/qmailadmin/ instead of my var/www/cgi-bin/ directory. How can I fix this? Cameron - Original Message - From: Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 4:13 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Can't get clamav-toaster to install Cameron wrote: I just went' through the CentOS installation guide and when it tried to install the clamav-toaster, it hung. I hit ctrl-c to get out and continued withthe installation. Once the installation was complete I tired to re-install clamav-toaster with no luck. I've tried uninstalling it, and I searched this list and found a similar problem last month. I tried the suggestions in that post, but again, the install of clamav-toaster hangs my machine. Does anyone know what is causing this and how I can fix it? I;ve tired bothe the .92-3.16 and .90.1-3.13 versionsboth have the same results. Unless someone has a pretty good crystal ball than mine, I'm guessing we'll need to know a few more details in order to be of any help. Which version of CentOS? What's your hardware? What were the last couple messages you see on the console before it hangs? When it hangs, can you open another console to check things out? (ctl-alt-f2) That should get things started. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.0/1216 - Release Date: 1/9/2008 10:16 AM - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
Dan, Did you get your backup server problem worked out? If so, what did you find? Phil -Original message- From: Dan McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:11:03 -0500 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE Sam, et. al. I would say that to get the best results out of SPAMDYKE, you DEFINITELY want *IT* to handle the TLS. My reasoning is 2-fold: 1) I have an average of 15% of incoming SPAM that is attaching with TLS (I thought this was odd, but apparently not) 2) I require TLS for my outbound mail (from my clients) and THEY TOO can be sources of SPAM. I'd like SPAMDYKE to equally fight inbound AND outbound SPAM! Just my thoughts. They were free to you, so take them at their face value. Daniel McAllister, President IT4SOHO, LLC Take my advice... I won't be using it today! Sam Clippinger wrote: Actually, enabling TLS in spamdyke is the best solution. When spamdyke handles the TLS, the remote server can't tell the difference -- if it was using TLS before, it should continue to do so. However, because spamdyke decrypts the traffic, it can enable all of its filters (including graylisting, recipient blacklisting, etc). If spamdyke simply passes TLS traffic through without decrypting it, most of its filters cannot operate. -- Sam Clippinger Davide Bozzelli wrote: Sam Clippinger ha scritto: OK, I should be able to duplicate that setup to see if I can reproduce your error. It may be a little while before I have the time, however. In the meantime, can you try enabling TLS support in spamdyke to see if this error persists? Inside spamdyke, TLS passthrough is handled differently than TLS decoding. If this is a spamdyke bug, you may be able to work around it. Enabling TLS support will also allow all of spamdyke's filters to function, including graylisting. To enable TLS, you'll need to compile spamdyke with TLS support and use the tls-certificate-file directive in the configuration file. Your TLS certificate is probably located at: /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem -- Sam Clippinger I can confirm this bug, i've have the exact problems with a qmail patched with jms combined patch that sends mail to a qmailtoaster with spamdyke enabled without tls. By enabling tls in spamdyke the problem went down, but it's not the correct way of work, cause the source mta don't do any tls handshake. Have fun, Davide - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)) solution?
I have not yet restarted the machine. I can do so... report in a minute. On Jan 14, 2008 1:15 PM, Phil Leinhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does clamd still spike near 100% for the first few minutes after a restart of the server? -Original message- From: dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:04:51 -0500 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)) solution? So I have been watching my machine since installing the later Clamd, and it appears to have solved the 100% CPU clamd instance. I am still going to watch if for another week to see if it pops anything else up, then add it to my other toasters. DNK On Jan 11, 2008 8:29 AM, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, you sparked my interest, and went and installed it. I will monitor it a few times on the hourly run to see what the CPU ends up doing. dnk On Jan 11, 2008 8:14 AM, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have not had a moment to attempt this as of yet (Client Audits - fun times). It is on my list for next week. Regards, Dnk On Jan 11, 2008 8:11 AM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PakOgah wrote: I was looking through the archives at the thread called qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)) and in that thread it was determined that this error was popping up when clamd was doing it's hourly thing and hogging all of the CPU. I have run into this exact symptom. With the thread it said the machine may simply be underpowered. I was curious if there was something further that could be done... perhaps you can try to upgrade clamav to lastest version on devel site. Did this solve your issue? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)) solution?
So I have been watching my machine since installing the later Clamd, and it appears to have solved the 100% CPU clamd instance. I am still going to watch if for another week to see if it pops anything else up, then add it to my other toasters. DNK On Jan 11, 2008 8:29 AM, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, you sparked my interest, and went and installed it. I will monitor it a few times on the hourly run to see what the CPU ends up doing. dnk On Jan 11, 2008 8:14 AM, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have not had a moment to attempt this as of yet (Client Audits - fun times). It is on my list for next week. Regards, Dnk On Jan 11, 2008 8:11 AM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PakOgah wrote: I was looking through the archives at the thread called qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)) and in that thread it was determined that this error was popping up when clamd was doing it's hourly thing and hogging all of the CPU. I have run into this exact symptom. With the thread it said the machine may simply be underpowered. I was curious if there was something further that could be done... perhaps you can try to upgrade clamav to lastest version on devel site. Did this solve your issue? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)) solution?
Does clamd still spike near 100% for the first few minutes after a restart of the server? -Original message- From: dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:04:51 -0500 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)) solution? So I have been watching my machine since installing the later Clamd, and it appears to have solved the 100% CPU clamd instance. I am still going to watch if for another week to see if it pops anything else up, then add it to my other toasters. DNK On Jan 11, 2008 8:29 AM, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, you sparked my interest, and went and installed it. I will monitor it a few times on the hourly run to see what the CPU ends up doing. dnk On Jan 11, 2008 8:14 AM, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have not had a moment to attempt this as of yet (Client Audits - fun times). It is on my list for next week. Regards, Dnk On Jan 11, 2008 8:11 AM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PakOgah wrote: I was looking through the archives at the thread called qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)) and in that thread it was determined that this error was popping up when clamd was doing it's hourly thing and hogging all of the CPU. I have run into this exact symptom. With the thread it said the machine may simply be underpowered. I was curious if there was something further that could be done... perhaps you can try to upgrade clamav to lastest version on devel site. Did this solve your issue? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] 550 5.7.1 Command rejected
Hi list, I have a customer trying to send a message to one server that replies always with 550 5.7.1 Command rejected I tested the server via telnet and got the same result when entering the from-adddress withaout surrounding the address. If the address does not come from the address-book (where it is mostly written in the required format), nobody writes it that way. How can I enforce qmail to write the signs around an email-address whenever that is missing? Any help is appreciated. Andreas - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] 550 5.7.1 Command rejected
It's not normal for the post office to reject mail like that. You should be able to telnet into the SMTP port and simply send a message like this: Telnet servername 25 Server responds with 220 message helo Server says hello mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Server says sender OK rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Server says recipient OK start data end with . on line alone Hi Jim . Server will forward NOTE, no on address Did you change anything in the settings for Qmail? Phil -Original message- From: Andreas Galatis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:35:08 -0500 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] 550 5.7.1 Command rejected Hi list, I have a customer trying to send a message to one server that replies always with 550 5.7.1 Command rejected I tested the server via telnet and got the same result when entering the from-adddress withaout surrounding the address. If the address does not come from the address-book (where it is mostly written in the required format), nobody writes it that way. How can I enforce qmail to write the signs around an email-address whenever that is missing? Any help is appreciated. Andreas - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)) solution?
I rebooted twice. My clam did not hit the CPU at all. My load was high (1.01) for that machine for about 2-3 minutes while courier did a few things, but flattened right out after that time period. One thing though, I had never watched it at boot before adding the new clam version, so i can not confirm I even had that symptom prior dnk On Jan 14, 2008 1:15 PM, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have not yet restarted the machine. I can do so... report in a minute. On Jan 14, 2008 1:15 PM, Phil Leinhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does clamd still spike near 100% for the first few minutes after a restart of the server? -Original message- From: dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:04:51 -0500 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)) solution? So I have been watching my machine since installing the later Clamd, and it appears to have solved the 100% CPU clamd instance. I am still going to watch if for another week to see if it pops anything else up, then add it to my other toasters. DNK On Jan 11, 2008 8:29 AM, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, you sparked my interest, and went and installed it. I will monitor it a few times on the hourly run to see what the CPU ends up doing. dnk On Jan 11, 2008 8:14 AM, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have not had a moment to attempt this as of yet (Client Audits - fun times). It is on my list for next week. Regards, Dnk On Jan 11, 2008 8:11 AM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PakOgah wrote: I was looking through the archives at the thread called qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)) and in that thread it was determined that this error was popping up when clamd was doing it's hourly thing and hogging all of the CPU. I have run into this exact symptom. With the thread it said the machine may simply be underpowered. I was curious if there was something further that could be done... perhaps you can try to upgrade clamav to lastest version on devel site. Did this solve your issue? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)) solution?
My clam hit the CPU pretty hard just after a restart for about 5 minutes. I think I recall someone saying it was because it had to load all of the definitions into memory. I guess I'll have to run mine through the newmodel tonight. Thanks, Phil -Original message- From: dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:28:42 -0500 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)) solution? I rebooted twice. My clam did not hit the CPU at all. My load was high (1.01) for that machine for about 2-3 minutes while courier did a few things, but flattened right out after that time period. One thing though, I had never watched it at boot before adding the new clam version, so i can not confirm I even had that symptom prior dnk On Jan 14, 2008 1:15 PM, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have not yet restarted the machine. I can do so... report in a minute. On Jan 14, 2008 1:15 PM, Phil Leinhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does clamd still spike near 100% for the first few minutes after a restart of the server? -Original message- From: dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:04:51 -0500 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)) solution? So I have been watching my machine since installing the later Clamd, and it appears to have solved the 100% CPU clamd instance. I am still going to watch if for another week to see if it pops anything else up, then add it to my other toasters. DNK On Jan 11, 2008 8:29 AM, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, you sparked my interest, and went and installed it. I will monitor it a few times on the hourly run to see what the CPU ends up doing. dnk On Jan 11, 2008 8:14 AM, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have not had a moment to attempt this as of yet (Client Audits - fun times). It is on my list for next week. Regards, Dnk On Jan 11, 2008 8:11 AM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PakOgah wrote: I was looking through the archives at the thread called qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)) and in that thread it was determined that this error was popping up when clamd was doing it's hourly thing and hogging all of the CPU. I have run into this exact symptom. With the thread it said the machine may simply be underpowered. I was curious if there was something further that could be done... perhaps you can try to upgrade clamav to lastest version on devel site. Did this solve your issue? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] Problem with backup Toaster
Thanks to those who responded -- both in the list, and directly. As it turns out, the entire issue was the preceding DOT in the smtproutes file. Leave off the dots, and the error messages quit! Thanks again... Dan -- Dan McAllister, President IT4SOHO, LLC - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] Problem with backup Toaster
Cool! I figured it would end up something simple like that. -Original Message- From: Dan McAllister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 7:04 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Problem with backup Toaster Thanks to those who responded -- both in the list, and directly. As it turns out, the entire issue was the preceding DOT in the smtproutes file. Leave off the dots, and the error messages quit! Thanks again... Dan -- Dan McAllister, President IT4SOHO, LLC - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
My two favorite words now are: DENIED_RDNS_MISSING DENIED_OTHER That is what my logs have as 95% plus of the emails coming in. I'm just wondering when they will realize that it isn't making it in. It's starting to slow down a bit. -Original Message- From: Sam Clippinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 3:03 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE I agree spamdyke should handle the TLS so all of its filters can be used (including graylisting). However, spamdyke can't filter outbound mail. Anything that's generated on your server (e.g. webmail users) will bypass spamdyke entirely. Anything that's sent through your server (e.g. your users' MUAs using your server as their SMTP host) will/should be whitelisted or authenticated. Granted, you _can_ setup spamdyke to filter mail generated by your users' MUAs but you won't like it -- you'll get a lot of angry phone calls. -- Sam Clippinger Dan McAllister wrote: Sam, et. al. I would say that to get the best results out of SPAMDYKE, you DEFINITELY want *IT* to handle the TLS. My reasoning is 2-fold: 1) I have an average of 15% of incoming SPAM that is attaching with TLS (I thought this was odd, but apparently not) 2) I require TLS for my outbound mail (from my clients) and THEY TOO can be sources of SPAM. I'd like SPAMDYKE to equally fight inbound AND outbound SPAM! Just my thoughts. They were free to you, so take them at their face value. Daniel McAllister, President IT4SOHO, LLC Take my advice... I won't be using it today! Sam Clippinger wrote: Actually, enabling TLS in spamdyke is the best solution. When spamdyke handles the TLS, the remote server can't tell the difference -- if it was using TLS before, it should continue to do so. However, because spamdyke decrypts the traffic, it can enable all of its filters (including graylisting, recipient blacklisting, etc). If spamdyke simply passes TLS traffic through without decrypting it, most of its filters cannot operate. -- Sam Clippinger Davide Bozzelli wrote: Sam Clippinger ha scritto: OK, I should be able to duplicate that setup to see if I can reproduce your error. It may be a little while before I have the time, however. In the meantime, can you try enabling TLS support in spamdyke to see if this error persists? Inside spamdyke, TLS passthrough is handled differently than TLS decoding. If this is a spamdyke bug, you may be able to work around it. Enabling TLS support will also allow all of spamdyke's filters to function, including graylisting. To enable TLS, you'll need to compile spamdyke with TLS support and use the tls-certificate-file directive in the configuration file. Your TLS certificate is probably located at: /var/qmail/control/servercert.pem -- Sam Clippinger I can confirm this bug, i've have the exact problems with a qmail patched with jms combined patch that sends mail to a qmailtoaster with spamdyke enabled without tls. By enabling tls in spamdyke the problem went down, but it's not the correct way of work, cause the source mta don't do any tls handshake. Have fun, Davide - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] can't send test message to myself
I just set up qmail-toaster on CentOS5, Core2 duo, 1 Gig ram machine with a clean install. Everything looks fine now, but when I try to send a test message to myself using the Squirrelmail interface, I get a 511 sorry, can't find a valid MX for sender domain error. I'm using a domain I own that doesn't currently have a mail server set up. The domain is bstastjohns.com and I have mail.bstastjohns.com A and MX records pointed to a temproary public IP at 71.86.114.51. I can't send in messages form outside either. I'm pretty new to Linux and really new to qmail so please be gentle. When I ping mail.bstastjohns.com it resolves to the correct IP. Any clues? Regards, Cameron - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] 550 5.7.1 Command rejected
Hi Phil, I did not change anything in qmail, it is a standard qmail-toaster running like it is since several years. I tested the other server as you can see here: telnet smtp.kiv.de 25 Trying 195.226.81.250... Connected to smtp.kiv.de. Escape character is '^]'. 220 smtp.kiv.de ESMTP EKOM21 helo atlas 250 smtp.kiv.de talking to X ([XX.XXX.XX.XXX]) mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 553 5.5.2 Bad command format If I set the mail-address in it goes through graylisting. telnet smtp.kiv.de 25 Trying 195.226.81.250... Connected to smtp.kiv.de. Escape character is '^]'. 220 smtp.kiv.de ESMTP EKOM21 helo atlas 250 smtp.kiv.de talking to X ([XX.XXX.XX.XXX]) mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 2.1.0 Ok rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 451 4.7.1 Greylisting in progress, please come back later I searched google for the error and found the where required, some mail-servers would insist on them while most servers where tolerant about this fault. Andreas Am Montag, 14. Januar 2008 22:51 schrieb Phil Leinhauser: It's not normal for the post office to reject mail like that. You should be able to telnet into the SMTP port and simply send a message like this: Telnet servername 25 Server responds with 220 message helo Server says hello mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Server says sender OK rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Server says recipient OK start data end with . on line alone Hi Jim . Server will forward NOTE, no on address Did you change anything in the settings for Qmail? Phil -Original message- From: Andreas Galatis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:35:08 -0500 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] 550 5.7.1 Command rejected Hi list, I have a customer trying to send a message to one server that replies always with 550 5.7.1 Command rejected I tested the server via telnet and got the same result when entering the from-adddress withaout surrounding the address. If the address does not come from the address-book (where it is mostly written in the required format), nobody writes it that way. How can I enforce qmail to write the signs around an email-address whenever that is missing? Any help is appreciated. Andreas - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] can't send test message to myself
Hi Cameron, me too, I cannot find an MX for bstastjohns.com Maybe you missed s.th. when setting up the MX? bye Andreas Am Dienstag, 15. Januar 2008 07:57 schrieb Cameron: I just set up qmail-toaster on CentOS5, Core2 duo, 1 Gig ram machine with a clean install. Everything looks fine now, but when I try to send a test message to myself using the Squirrelmail interface, I get a 511 sorry, can't find a valid MX for sender domain error. I'm using a domain I own that doesn't currently have a mail server set up. The domain is bstastjohns.com and I have mail.bstastjohns.com A and MX records pointed to a temproary public IP at 71.86.114.51. I can't send in messages form outside either. I'm pretty new to Linux and really new to qmail so please be gentle. When I ping mail.bstastjohns.com it resolves to the correct IP. Any clues? Regards, Cameron - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
