[qmailtoaster] Re: DomainKeys signout FAILED - DKIM signout OK - need togetthem both

2012-06-16 Thread Eric Shubert

On 06/15/2012 08:44 PM, F. Mendez wrote:

Because a lot of mail server this days still use and checks for
domainkeys and not only dkim. In fact, even BIG isp checks for both.


That's a pretty broad claim. I'd like to see documentation supporting this.

On the inbound side, it might make sense to check for either. That's 
different from checking for both though.


On the outbound side, it makes little sense to sign messages with both.

BL is that inbound and outbound should be addressed separately.

Yahoo might be last lone DK holdout (given they developed it), so 
outbound messages going to yahoo should perhaps be signed with DK, and 
all others signed with DKIM. I would not recommend this though. I 
believe that yahoo will eventually need to handle DKIM so long as the 
majority are using it.



We need to have and offer 100% all possible checks for domain
certification email traffic.



I respectfully disagree.
See http://email-museum.com/2008/03/12/dkim-vs-domainkeys-confusion/ for 
instance. This was written 4 years ago. Eventually DKIM is expected to 
supersede DK, and DK will be obsolete. If DK isn't deprecated already, 
it should be (imo).


At the rate we're going, by the time we would implement DK successfully, 
I expect it will be all but obsolete. If someone comes up with a working 
DK check for incoming messages on QMT, I'm more than happy to include 
it. I don't see it as a high priority though.


For outbound messages, I see no need for DK signing providing that DKIM 
is implemented. If DK is desired, I think it should be only for certain 
destinations, such as yahoo. Again, this is a very low priority in my 
mind, as it's a problem which I expect will solve itself with time.


--
-Eric 'shubes'


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com



[qmailtoaster] Qmailtoaster update

2012-06-16 Thread Peter Tan
Hi,

I'm having trouble running the updates:

Building qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22 ...
error: /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/SRPMS/qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.src.rpm cannot
be installed
Installing /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/SRPMS/qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.src.rpm
end of log messages

qtp-build-rpms - see
/mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log for more details

Build failed, Exiting.


My current versions:

qtp-ami-up2date
New Qmail-Toaster Packages Available:
 available: qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22
(installed: qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.20)
 available: clamav-toaster-0.97.4-1.4.0
(installed: clamav-toaster-0.97.3-1.3.44)


[qmailtoaster] Re: Qmailtoaster update

2012-06-16 Thread Eric Shubert

On 06/16/2012 07:31 AM, Peter Tan wrote:

Hi,

I'm having trouble running the updates:

Building qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22 ...
error: /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/SRPMS/qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.src.rpm
cannot be installed
Installing /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/SRPMS/qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.src.rpm
end of log messages

qtp-build-rpms - see
/mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log for more details

Build failed, Exiting.


My current versions:

qtp-ami-up2date
New Qmail-Toaster Packages Available:
  available: qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22
(installed: qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.20)
  available: clamav-toaster-0.97.4-1.4.0
(installed: clamav-toaster-0.97.3-1.3.44)



Looks like your downloaded file is bad.
# rm /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/SRPMS/qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.src.rpm
then try again.

FWIW, we're beginning work on implementing integrity checks of downloads 
so recovery of this sort of thing will be automatic. In the meantime, 
thanks for bearing with us.


--
-Eric 'shubes'


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com



Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Qmailtoaster update

2012-06-16 Thread Peter Tan
Thanks Eric, it worked. I'd to remove the clam rpm too for it to work.

On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:

 On 06/16/2012 07:31 AM, Peter Tan wrote:

 Hi,

 I'm having trouble running the updates:

 Building qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22 ...
 error: /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/SRPMS/**qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.src.**rpm
 cannot be installed
 Installing /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/SRPMS/**qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.src.**
 rpm
 end of log messages

 qtp-build-rpms - see
 /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-**upgrade/log/build-recent.log for more
 details

 Build failed, Exiting.


 My current versions:

 qtp-ami-up2date
 New Qmail-Toaster Packages Available:
  available: qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22
 (installed: qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.20)
  available: clamav-toaster-0.97.4-1.4.0
 (installed: clamav-toaster-0.97.3-1.3.44)


 Looks like your downloaded file is bad.
 # rm /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/SRPMS/**qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.src.**rpm
 then try again.

 FWIW, we're beginning work on implementing integrity checks of downloads
 so recovery of this sort of thing will be automatic. In the meantime,
 thanks for bearing with us.

 --
 -Eric 'shubes'


 --**--**-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
 qmailtoaster-list-unsubscribe@**qmailtoaster.comqmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: 
 qmailtoaster-list-help@**qmailtoaster.comqmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: DomainKeys signout FAILED - DKIM signout OK - need togetthem both

2012-06-16 Thread Ernesto Vargas
All ISP, EPS check for both but are not required to have both. SPF+DKIM is more 
than enough. 

In case you have require 100% deliverability, you better enroll on Return 
Path's Email Certification Program or Spamhaus whitelist.

 
Ernesto Vargas-Azofeifa
Senior Web Developer  IT Manager
Macromedia Certified Cold Fusion  Web Developer
LAMP stack expert.




 From: F. Mendez fmende...@terra.com
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com 
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: DomainKeys signout FAILED - DKIM signout OK - 
need togetthem both
 
Because a lot of mail server this days still use and checks for domainkeys 
and not only dkim. In fact, even BIG isp checks for both.

We need to have and offer 100% all possible checks for domain certification 
email traffic.




Regards.



-Mensaje original- 
From: Eric Shubert
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 7:44 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: DomainKeys signout FAILED - DKIM signout OK - 
need togetthem both

The stock domainkeys (qmail-dk) process has never worked 100%. I expect
that we'll be removing that implementation at some point in the future.
DKIM will be included in the stock QMT at some point, but I can't say
when. I'm not optimistic that a working DK will ever be included. Why
would anyone want DK if they have a working DKIM implementation?

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

On 06/15/2012 05:23 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
 Hello Ernesto,

 did you EVER had DomainKeys working? I mean, did you test it before
 installing changes for DKIM?

 Because if you had it working before installing DKIM, this means that the
 file change on DKIM setup is the one that is not signing.


 Hopefully some of the creators of QMT may arise and help us.



 Regards.

 -Mensaje original- From: Ernesto Vargas
 Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 9:47 AM
 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Cc: F. Mendez
 Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] DomainKeys signout FAILED - DKIM signout OK
 - need to getthem both

 SPF its just DNS entries nothing to do with QmailToaster.

 Yes I am on the same situation where DomainKeys are not been sign but
 DKIM are, but SPF+DKIM is more than enough for me agains Google, Hotmail
 and Yahoo.

 Saludos,

 Ernesto Vargas

 On 06/15/2012 01:21 AM, F. Mendez wrote:
 Hello ppl.


 I am getting my self more and more into QMT and learning it every day.
 Cool solution.

 Today I were trying to get DomainKeys and DKIM both sign out. I need
 this, the reason, don't matter.

 I got first DomainKeys setup following the WIKI QMT pages. But I didn't
 test it.

 Then I went with DKIM and also followed what WIKI info showed.

 After sending a simple mail, I got DKIM signout working but no signout
 of DomainKeys.

 Yes I have done ALL steps for each, no error aparently showed.

 What Im suspecting is that when I got dkim installed, the tutorial also
 showed that a BIN file had to be replaced.

 Would that BIN version have DKIM only support and no DomainKeys?


 Also SPF is not working too.


 I need help here friends.



 Thanks.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com