[qmailtoaster] Forwards to gmail being seen as spam

2010-08-01 Thread Jim Bassett
Hi all. Hopefully this is on topic enough for the qmail list. I'm  
running qmail toaster and have a handful of account holders (on  
various virtual domains) who have their mail forwarded from their acco...@virtualdomain.com 
 on my server to their acco...@gmail.com. This has always worked fine  
- I just set the forwarding in virtualdomain.com/qmailadmin/


But for the past few days I have been getting tons of bounced emails  
that all are connected to these accounts that forward to gmail, and  
I'm having a hard time figuring out exactly what is going on, and most  
importantly, whether I am in danger of having my whole mail server  
blacklisted by google. Here is a typical one below. I'm very thankful  
if anyone can take the time to look at what is happening here. I've  
replaced the real email addresses with the following fake, but  
hopefully clear, addresses:


s...@spammer.com: replaces the spammers email address. This is  
constantly changing from email to email.


myu...@hisdomain.com: is a legitimate user of my mail server through  
his own virtual domain on my server.


myu...@gmail.com: is the same legitimate user's gmail account where myu...@hisdomain.com 
 is set to forward to.


my.mailserver.com: is my fake mail server domain
1.2.3.4: is my fake mail server IP

74.125.95.27: is google IP and has not been changed.

Below is a typical message:

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ash.datamantic.com.
I tried to deliver a bounce message to this address, but the bounce  
bounced!


s...@spammer.com:
User and password not set, continuing without authentication.
74.125.95.27 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach  
does not exist. Please try

550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or
550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at
550 5.1.1 http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=6596  
f14si10875163ibb.15

Giving up on 74.125.95.27.

--- Below this line is the original bounce.

Return-Path: 
Received: (qmail 32438 invoked for bounce); 1 Aug 2010 09:01:22 -
Date: 1 Aug 2010 09:01:22 -
From: mailer-dae...@my.mailserver.com
To: s...@spammer.com
Subject: failure notice

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at my.mailserver.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following  
addresses.

This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

myu...@gmail.com:
User and password not set, continuing without authentication.
myu...@gmail.com 74.125.95.27 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 550-5.7.1 [1.2.3.4 7] Our system has detected an  
unusual rate of unsolicited
550-5.7.1 mail originating from your IP address. To protect our users  
from
550-5.7.1 spam, mail sent from your IP address has been blocked.  
Please visit
550-5.7.1 http://www.google.com/mail/help/bulk_mail.html to review our  
Bulk

550 5.7.1 Email Senders Guidelines. v16si10850185ibh.66

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: s...@spammer.com
Received: (qmail 32426 invoked by uid 89); 1 Aug 2010 09:01:20 -
Delivered-To: myu...@hisdomain.com
Received: (qmail 32421 invoked by uid 89); 1 Aug 2010 09:01:20 -
Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 32403, pid: 32412, t: 1.3451s
scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.95.2/m:51/d:9872 spam: 3.2.5
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on  
my.mailserver.com

X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.0 required=4.5 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE,
ONLINE_PHARMACY,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Report:
*  3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
*  [score: 1.]
*  0.0 ONLINE_PHARMACY BODY: Online Pharmacy
*  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
*  1.5 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS
Received: from unknown (HELO microsof09249f) (94.178.58.77)
 by my.mailserver.com with SMTP; 1 Aug 2010 09:01:19 -
Received-SPF: unknown (ash.datamantic.com: Multiple SPF records  
returned)

Received: (qmail 4495 by uid 495); Sun, 1 Aug 2010 13:00:53 -0300
From: Try Viagra4Free s...@spammer.com
To: myu...@hisdomain.com
Subject: ***SPAM*** The magical blue pills will do it
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 12:19:55 -0300
Message-ID: 000c01cb3179$9aca8ac0$d05fa0...@org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary==_NextPart_000_000B_01CB3179.9ACA8AC0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcjrHiuRR5w52cipMs1HC4vOVsX2gg==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Spam-Prev-Subject: The magical blue pills will do it

This is a multipart message in MIME format.

--=_NextPart_000_000B_01CB3179.9ACA8AC0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Your cheapest sex drugs online
http://friendmoral.com/


The way I see it, spam is being received by my mail server. It is  
correctly marked as spam by my spamassassin. And then it is 

[qmailtoaster] isoqlog question...

2009-10-08 Thread Jim Bassett
Hi list. I have just upgraded to the latest qmailtoaster and have  
started looking at isoqlog in /admin-toaster/ for the first time. Can  
someone explain to me why I see lots of email addresses that don't  
actually exist on my system? For instance, if I look under 'General'  
and then click through to a specific year, month, and day, I will see  
some addresses in 'Top 100 Sender' that are not actual addresses. Some  
are for non existent accounts on domains that do exist on the system,  
and some are for domains that aren't even on my system.


I'm fairly confident I'm not an open relay (and http://www.spamhelp.org/shopenrelay/ 
 agrees I am not.) But still this has me a bit freaked out. Thanks  
for any insight.


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




Re: [qmailtoaster] send from remote client doesn't disconnect...

2009-07-22 Thread Jim Bassett

64 bit.

clamd log looks fine, but spamd log is filled with this:

warn: prefork: syswrite(6) failed, retrying... at /usr/lib/perl5/ 
vendor_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/SpamdForkScaling.pm line 554


Looks like that's the issue. Not sure why it just started happening  
though.


On Jul 22, 2009, at 7:10 AM, Jake Vickers wrote:


Jim Bassett wrote:
Thank you everyone for your suggestions. I really appreciate the  
help.


I did what Dave suggested and emptied the /var/qmail/control/ 
blacklists file and then reloaded. No change. Then I tried Eric's  
suggestion and set my external IP address the same as SM in the  
tcp.smtp file and rebuilt. This allowed me to send mail without  
delay. So it must be something within the server.


And although I am not seeing it myself, others with email accounts  
on the server are now reporting getting hundreds of duplicate  
incoming messages. Yuck. I think I might be fubar'd. On the other  
hand, maybe this gives someone an idea of where to look?


That happens commonly when clamav (or spamassassin) takes too long  
processing the message or hangs. Qmail thinks the message got lost  
somewhere, and resends it. Then once the first message finally pops  
out of clam or spamassassin, it gets delivered. So does the 2nd copy  
that Qmail sent.
Look at your clamav and spamassassin logs and see if there are any  
clues in there.

32 bit or 64 system?


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com 
)
  Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and  
installations.

If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
   Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and  
packages.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
   For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com






-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




Re: [qmailtoaster] send from remote client doesn't disconnect...

2009-07-21 Thread Jim Bassett
That makes sense. I can't find anything though. Here's a couple more  
points as a last try to see if anyone can think of anything:


I was wrong about the outgoing mail being delivered immediately even  
though the client would hang. The mails are not delivered until the  
client finally shows a completed send - usually around 3 minutes per  
email (client show quick progress right up to completion, but then  
hangs at the very end.)


If I telnet to port 25, do an auth login, and send mail from the  
command line the same thing happens. The smtp server is completely  
responsive up through where I say 'DATA' and type in the body of the  
message. But then when I type /n/r./n/r to end the DATA absolutely  
nothing happens for several minutes until it finally replies with '250  
ok'. (Is there any way to make the smtp server more verbose here?)


This same delay happens from multiple clients, multiple locations,  
multiple email accounts. It happens whether the recipient is on the  
same domain (same server) or on a remote server. But webmail can send  
without delay in any situation.


Reverse DNS and resolving DNS are correct and trouble free.

That webmail can send but remote clients cannot seems like the key.  
What is different in the sending process between these two? Are there  
checks / scans that are done for remote clients that wouldn't be done  
for someone logged into webmail?


Thank you very much for any ideas!


On Jul 20, 2009, at 1:28 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:

If nothing has changed on the server and nothing changed on the  
clients, maybe something changed between them. Routing issue perhaps  
near the server end? Just a swag.


Jim Bassett wrote:
Thanks for the reply. All different client software (Apple Mail and  
Microsoft Outlook mostly) from different locations. Port 465. No  
spamdyke. This just started happening today after working fine for  
years. Nothing was changed on the server recentlyt although I did  
have a mystery few minutes yesterday where load averages spiked to  
around 100 for no reason I could track down (MySQL was at least  
part of the issue.)

On Jul 20, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:

Jim Bassett wrote:
Hi. I'm having a problem sending mail. Sending out through  
Squirrelmail works fine. Sending out through a remote client  
takes a very long time (~ 1 minute.) But the mail is actually  
sent very fast - for example, if I send out through an account on  
my server running qmailtoaster to my gmail account I can see the  
email arrive in Gmail account almost immediately, but my local  
email client still appears to be sending, having become stuck  
with the progress bar showing 99% complete. So it seems like  
qmail is just not disconnecting from the client even though the  
mail has actually been sent.
There is nothing in my queue. Load average on the server is  
reasonable. DNS checks out fine. Resolving nameserver is working  
fast. This happens from multiple accounts on multiple different  
hosted domains on my server.

Any thoughts on what to check? Thank you!


Which client software?
Which port? (smtp/submission)
Using spamdyke?

Does this happen with different client software? Connecting from  
different locations?


--
-Eric 'shubes'




--
-Eric 'shubes'


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com 
)
  Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and  
installations.

If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
   Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and  
packages.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
   For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com






-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




[qmailtoaster] send from remote client doesn't disconnect...

2009-07-20 Thread Jim Bassett
Hi. I'm having a problem sending mail. Sending out through  
Squirrelmail works fine. Sending out through a remote client takes a  
very long time (~ 1 minute.) But the mail is actually sent very fast -  
for example, if I send out through an account on my server running  
qmailtoaster to my gmail account I can see the email arrive in Gmail  
account almost immediately, but my local email client still appears to  
be sending, having become stuck with the progress bar showing 99%  
complete. So it seems like qmail is just not disconnecting from the  
client even though the mail has actually been sent.


There is nothing in my queue. Load average on the server is  
reasonable. DNS checks out fine. Resolving nameserver is working fast.  
This happens from multiple accounts on multiple different hosted  
domains on my server.


Any thoughts on what to check? Thank you!

-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




Re: [qmailtoaster] send from remote client doesn't disconnect...

2009-07-20 Thread Jim Bassett
Thanks for the reply. All different client software (Apple Mail and  
Microsoft Outlook mostly) from different locations. Port 465. No  
spamdyke. This just started happening today after working fine for  
years. Nothing was changed on the server recentlyt although I did have  
a mystery few minutes yesterday where load averages spiked to around  
100 for no reason I could track down (MySQL was at least part of the  
issue.)



On Jul 20, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:


Jim Bassett wrote:
Hi. I'm having a problem sending mail. Sending out through  
Squirrelmail works fine. Sending out through a remote client takes  
a very long time (~ 1 minute.) But the mail is actually sent very  
fast - for example, if I send out through an account on my server  
running qmailtoaster to my gmail account I can see the email arrive  
in Gmail account almost immediately, but my local email client  
still appears to be sending, having become stuck with the progress  
bar showing 99% complete. So it seems like qmail is just not  
disconnecting from the client even though the mail has actually  
been sent.
There is nothing in my queue. Load average on the server is  
reasonable. DNS checks out fine. Resolving nameserver is working  
fast. This happens from multiple accounts on multiple different  
hosted domains on my server.

Any thoughts on what to check? Thank you!


Which client software?
Which port? (smtp/submission)
Using spamdyke?

Does this happen with different client software? Connecting from  
different locations?


--
-Eric 'shubes'


-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com 
)
  Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and  
installations.

If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
   Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and  
packages.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
   For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com






-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
-
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com

For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com




[qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel for fresh install

2008-11-25 Thread Jim Bassett
Hi. I have a new CentOS 5.2 installation. I have attempted to use qtp- 
newmodel to do a fresh install of qmail toaster. There was a recent  
thread on the list asking about this although it was never resolved  
whether it was possible or not. I have done it. The builds failed at  
numerous places due to missing dependencies, but once everything  
needed was installed qtp-newmodel appears to have built and installed  
qmail toaster successfully. Very cool. My one problem is that mysql  
was not configured for vpopmail (no vpopmail user; no vpopmail  
database) so I can't add any domains. If I try to do /home/vpopmail/ 
bin/vadddomain I get: Error - no authentication database connection.  
Initial open. (obviously, since MySQL doesn't have the user/database!)


Any suggestions on the best way to make the vpopmail user and database  
in mysql? I have another installation I could just copy by hand, but  
is there something I could just run that would make everything?


MySQL was not running when I installed via qtp-newmodel. Would qtp- 
newmodel have made the database and mysql user if MySQL had been  
running? If so, can I just uninstall qmailtoaster and install it again  
with qtp-newmodel (and MySQL running this time?) If so, what is the  
best way to do this? I can't find anything on the wiki about  
uninstalling.


Thanks.

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel for fresh install

2008-11-25 Thread Jim Bassett
Hey thanks, that worked. I thought I had to recreate the specific  
tables too, but it looks like that gets taken care of for you as long  
as you have the user and database in MySQL. Super easy.




On Nov 25, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Chris Hillman wrote:


I ran in to the same issue - I think this will fix it...

Run the following as root on your mysql server:

create database vpopmail;
grant all on vpopmail.*
to 'vpopmail'@'localhost'
identified by 'yourpasswordhere';
flush privileges;

Then, from the FAQ:

Change the /home/vpopmail/etc/vpopmail.mysql file with your new
password, from your favorite editor.

Cheers,
Chris

-Original Message-
From: Jim Bassett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 8:37 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel for fresh install

Hi. I have a new CentOS 5.2 installation. I have attempted to use qtp-
newmodel to do a fresh install of qmail toaster. There was a recent
thread on the list asking about this although it was never resolved
whether it was possible or not. I have done it. The builds failed at
numerous places due to missing dependencies, but once everything
needed was installed qtp-newmodel appears to have built and installed
qmail toaster successfully. Very cool. My one problem is that mysql
was not configured for vpopmail (no vpopmail user; no vpopmail
database) so I can't add any domains. If I try to do /home/vpopmail/
bin/vadddomain I get: Error - no authentication database connection.
Initial open. (obviously, since MySQL doesn't have the user/ 
database!)


Any suggestions on the best way to make the vpopmail user and database
in mysql? I have another installation I could just copy by hand, but
is there something I could just run that would make everything?

MySQL was not running when I installed via qtp-newmodel. Would qtp-
newmodel have made the database and mysql user if MySQL had been
running? If so, can I just uninstall qmailtoaster and install it again
with qtp-newmodel (and MySQL running this time?) If so, what is the
best way to do this? I can't find anything on the wiki about
uninstalling.

Thanks.

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] No Match for argument: perl-DB_File

2008-05-10 Thread Jim Bassett
I've got some perl conflicts that are giving me transaction check  
errors when trying to upgrade with qtp-newmodel. If I exclude perl* in  
my rpmforge repo then qtp-newmodel runs through to completion instead  
of failing (although I haven't actually done the upgrade yet.) So  
while it doesn't fail anymore, it does complain about the following  
(before going on to apparently build everything successfully in the  
sandbox):


No Match for argument: perl-DB_File
No Match for argument: perl-Mail-DomainKeys
No Match for argument: perl-Mail-SPF-Query
No Match for argument: perl-MIME-Base64
No Match for argument: perl-Net-SMTP
Nothing to do

Can anyone give me an idea about the result of upgrading without these  
packages?








-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] upgrading to QTP...

2008-05-06 Thread Jim Bassett
I'm trying to upgrade an old QMT to QTP and ran into a little trouble.  
Here's the end of the output from qtp-newmodel where it fails:


[...snip...]

Would you like a unioned sandbox (quicker, smaller) [y]/n: y

Using union filesystem ...
qtp-mount-sandbox v0.3
--No existing unionfs115 found.  Continuing with build process
--Testing for valid rpm install tool:
yum -y install found!

--Searching for valid kernel source/devel to build unionfs115:
--Looking at current kernel
--You have no installed kernel source!
--Installing

--Installing the most current kernel source
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
rpmforge  100% |=| 1.1 kB 
00:00
update100% |=|  951 B 
00:00
qmailtoaster-plus 100% |=|  951 B 
00:00
base  100% |=| 1.1 kB 
00:00
addons100% |=|  951 B 
00:00
extras100% |=| 1.1 kB 
00:00

Reading repository metadata in from local files
Parsing package install arguments
Resolving Dependencies
-- Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
--- Downloading header for kernel-smp-devel to pack into transaction  
set.
kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-67 100% |=| 755 kB 
00:00

--- Package kernel-smp-devel.x86_64 0:2.6.9-67.0.7.EL set to be updated
-- Running transaction check

Dependencies Resolved

= 
= 
= 
= 
= 

 Package Arch   Version   
RepositorySize
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 


Installing:
 kernel-smp-develx86_64 2.6.9-67.0.7.EL   
update3.8 M


Transaction Summary
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 


Install  1 Package(s)
Update   0 Package(s)
Remove   0 Package(s)
Total download size: 3.8 M
Downloading Packages:
(1/1): kernel-smp-devel-2 100% |=| 3.8 MB 
00:04

Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Test Succeeded
Running Transaction
  Installing: kernel-smp-devel #  
[1/1]


Installed: kernel-smp-devel.x86_64 0:2.6.9-67.0.7.EL
Complete!

--Checking if install process went okay
--Install process failed!!
--Please install manually and reboot to latest kernel release before  
retry!

qtp-build-unionfs failed, Exiting!

qtp-newmodel - qtp-mount-sandbox failed, exiting

[...end...]


My questions are: Did this actually install a new kernal? If I reboot  
the machine will I be running the new kernal? What does 'Please  
install manually' mean (is this referring to the kernal? maybe the new  
kernal is not really installed and I have to do it manually through  
yum before rebooting?) What if I do qtp-newmodel again and this time  
say 'no' when it asks if I want a 'unioned sandbox'? Might that make  
it install without updating the kernal? I'm just always a little  
nervous to install new things and reboot - should I get over this?


Sorry for my confusion. Thanks so much for any help!

- Jim


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrading to QTP...

2008-05-06 Thread Jim Bassett


On May 6, 2008, at 2:40 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:


Jim Bassett wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade an old QMT to QTP and ran into a little  
trouble.

Here's the end of the output from qtp-newmodel where it fails:

[...snip...]

Would you like a unioned sandbox (quicker, smaller) [y]/n: y

Using union filesystem ...
qtp-mount-sandbox v0.3
--No existing unionfs115 found.  Continuing with build process
--Testing for valid rpm install tool:
yum -y install found!

--Searching for valid kernel source/devel to build unionfs115:
--Looking at current kernel
--You have no installed kernel source!
--Installing

--Installing the most current kernel source
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
rpmforge  100% |=| 1.1  
kB00:00
update100% |=|  951  
B00:00
qmailtoaster-plus 100% |=|  951  
B00:00
base  100% |=| 1.1  
kB00:00
addons100% |=|  951  
B00:00
extras100% |=| 1.1  
kB00:00

Reading repository metadata in from local files
Parsing package install arguments
Resolving Dependencies
-- Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
--- Downloading header for kernel-smp-devel to pack into  
transaction set.
kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-67 100% |=| 755  
kB00:00
--- Package kernel-smp-devel.x86_64 0:2.6.9-67.0.7.EL set to be  
updated

-- Running transaction check

Dependencies Resolved

= 
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 
=


Package Arch   Version   
RepositorySize
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 
=


Installing:
kernel-smp-develx86_64 2.6.9-67.0.7.EL  update
3.8 M

Transaction Summary
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 
=


Install  1 Package(s)
Update   0 Package(s)
Remove   0 Package(s)
Total download size: 3.8 M
Downloading Packages:
(1/1): kernel-smp-devel-2 100% |=| 3.8  
MB00:04

Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Test Succeeded
Running Transaction
 Installing: kernel-smp-devel #  
[1/1]


Installed: kernel-smp-devel.x86_64 0:2.6.9-67.0.7.EL
Complete!

--Checking if install process went okay
--Install process failed!!
--Please install manually and reboot to latest kernel release  
before retry!

qtp-build-unionfs failed, Exiting!

qtp-newmodel - qtp-mount-sandbox failed, exiting

[...end...]


My questions are: Did this actually install a new kernal?


No, it installed the kernel development package. The kernel-dev  
package
contains kernel headers, which are part of the kernel source, used  
when

compiling kernel modules.


If I reboot the machine will I be running the new kernal?


No, as there's no new kernel installed.


What does 'Please install
manually' mean (is this referring to the kernal? maybe the new  
kernal is

not really installed and I have to do it manually through yum before
rebooting?)


This sorta looks like a bug of some sort to me. The yum install  
seemed to go

ok, but the script doesn't appear to think so.


What if I do qtp-newmodel again and this time say 'no' when
it asks if I want a 'unioned sandbox'?


That would allow you to pick a copied or linked sandbox, either one  
of which

should work. Both will take a bit of time, and a copied sandbox takes
considerable (2G+) disk space.


Might that make it install
without updating the kernal?


Yes. There are no kernel modules involved with a linked or copied  
sandbox,

only a unionfs one.


I'm just always a little nervous to install
new things and reboot - should I get over this?


No, rebooting is very rarely necessary. Or at least should be.


Sorry for my confusion. Thanks so much for any help!


No problem.

I'm a bit curious why the script chose to install the kernel-smp-devel
package. Are you running the smp kernel? What does
# uname -a
show? Also,
# rpm -qa | grep kernel
?


--
-Eric 'shubes'



Thanks for the response Eric!

# uname -a
Linux server1.example.com 2.6.9-22.0.2.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Jan 17  
06:12:06 CST 2006 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux


# rpm -qa | grep kernel
kernel-2.6.9-22.EL
kernel-utils-2.4-13.1.69
kernel-smp-2.6.9-22.0.2.EL
kernel-smp-2.6.9-22.EL
kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-67.0.7.EL
kernel-2.6.9-22.0.2.EL

I tried qtp-newmodel again with a unioned sandbox and it failed in  
exactly the same way. Then I did qtp-newmodel again, this time with a  
linked sandbox. This got much further but then failed when trying to  
update some perl stuff:


Transaction Check Error:   file /usr/share/man/man3/ 
MIME::Base64.3pm.gz from install of perl-MIME-Base64-3.07-1.el4.rf  
conflicts with file

Re: [qmailtoaster] SMTP password auth on port 25 stopped working after reboot...

2008-04-30 Thread Jim Bassett


On Apr 29, 2008, at 7:28 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all. I've had qmail toaster running for over a year with very  
few
problems (thanks in large part to this list and the archives.)  
Today I
rebooted my server for the first time in a long time. Everything  
is okay
except I can no longer send outgoing mail from remote machines. I  
get an

error: The SMTP server mail.mydomain.com doesn’t support
authentication. But I've always used password authentication for
sending
mail on port 25 in the past and it's always worked great. Any  
guesses

what
went wrong? It must have been due to the reboot. How can I get  
password

SMTP password auth working again on port 25?

Note: I searched the list and I know the answer usually given in
somewhat
similar situations is just to have senders use port 587 and auth  
will be
forced to happen. But I have a lot of non-technical users and it  
is not
possible to walk them all through changing their settings to use  
port

587.
I need it to work on port 25. Where should I look?

Thanks.


Please post the result of:
# cat /var/qmail/control/blacklists

--
-Eric 'shubes'




cat /var/qmail/control/blacklists
-r zen.spamhaus.org



zen.spamhaus.org is a combination of 3 other spamhaus lists (see
http://spamhaus.org). The pbl list is what's probably blocking, so  
try:

-r sbl.spamhaus.org -r xbl.spamhaus.org
instead, and see if that works.

That's your easiest work around. Instead of doing this, you could try
installing spamdyke, which should fix you up too. Spamdyke does no  
blocking
when a user is authenticated. I highly recommend going this route.  
It's
really trivial to do using the script that's included in  
qmailtoaster-plus.


--
-Eric 'shubes'



That worked. Thank you! I'll look at spamdyke too.


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]