Re: [qmailtoaster] policy_check in the log files?
that is what is happening for me too. same setup centos 4.7 and the latest qmail-toaster package. the log alarmed me to post the question :) On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:20 AM, d...@acbsco.com d...@acbsco.com wrote: Slamp, eMPF is installed by default (thanks Jake!). If the /var/qmail/control/policy is emtpy or missing, eMPF has no rules to check, so eMPF is disabled. Interestingly, policy_check still shows in the /var/log/qmail/smtp/current file after removing the policy file and restarting qmail. At least it does on my system running centos4.7 and the following packages: qmailtoaster-plus.repo-0.1-1 ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.8 courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.10 qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.6 qmailtoaster-plus-0.3.1-1.4.12 vpopmail-toaster-5.4.17-1.3.7 maildrop-toaster-2.0.3-1.3.8 libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.6 vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.6 ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.6 ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.6 maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.3-1.3.8 daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.6 courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.2-1.3.10 autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.6 ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.6 qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.12-1.3.8 simscan-toaster-1.4.0-1.3.8 clamav-toaster-0.95.2-1.3.29 isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.7 squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.19-1.3.15 libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.6 control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.7 qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.18 qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.18 spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5-1.3.17 send-emails-toaster-0.5-1.3. This is different behavior from older versions where if the policy file was missing, policy_check would not be written to the /var/log/qmail/smtp/current file. Can anyone else verify this to be true? Dave slamp slamp wrote: hey guys, i haven't been able to follow development on qmailtoaster for awhile but i just recently installed qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.20.i386 and i see policy_check in the logs. i guess the question is what is this for? is it disabled by default? is it eMPF? the wiki has instructions for setting it up unless now we enable it by default? - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] policy_check in the log files?
hey guys, i haven't been able to follow development on qmailtoaster for awhile but i just recently installed qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.20.i386 and i see policy_check in the logs. i guess the question is what is this for? is it disabled by default? is it eMPF? the wiki has instructions for setting it up unless now we enable it by default? - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] issues with new courier-authlib package
Could this be the reason? 0.60.4 2008-05-08 Mr. Sam s...@email-scan.com * Makefile: Drop the unmaintained authvchkpw module. Maybe we should go to Dovecot sooner than later. I want to but i need my hands held to do so :) On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:55 PM, slamp slampslack...@gmail.com wrote: Getting the error below. 06-15 23:43:43 INFO: modules=authvchkpw, daemons=15 06-15 23:43:43 INFO: Installing libauthvchkpw 06-15 23:43:43 INFO: libauthvchkpw.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory 06-15 23:45:06 INFO: stopping authdaemond children New package does not contain the missing file. # rpm -qpl courier-authlib-toaster-0.62.2-1.3.9.i386.rpm |grep libauthvchkpw Old package does. # rpm -qpl courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.2-1.3.6.i386.rpm |grep libauthvchkpw /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libauthvchkpw.a /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libauthvchkpw.la /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libauthvchkpw.so /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libauthvchkpw.so.0 /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libauthvchkpw.so.0.0.0 r...@mail:/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386 Also as a side note, I had to put --nodeps to install the latest authlib package because it was complaing that maildrop needed the libcourierauth.so.0 file. I went back to the old package. Using centos-release-4-7 i386. autorespond-toaster-2.0.5-1.3.4 clamav-toaster-0.95.1-1.3.27 control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.4 courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.2-1.3.6 courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.7 daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.3 ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.3 ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.3 isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.4 libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.3 libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.3 maildrop-toaster-2.1.0-1.3.6 qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.12-1.3.7 qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.3 qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.15 qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.15 ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.3 send-emails-toaster-0.5-1.3.4 simscan-toaster-1.4.0-1.3.0 spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5-1.3.14 squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.18-1.3.14 ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.5 vpopmail-toaster-5.4.17-1.3.4 vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.3 - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] issues with new courier-authlib package
Getting the error below. 06-15 23:43:43 INFO: modules=authvchkpw, daemons=15 06-15 23:43:43 INFO: Installing libauthvchkpw 06-15 23:43:43 INFO: libauthvchkpw.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory 06-15 23:45:06 INFO: stopping authdaemond children New package does not contain the missing file. # rpm -qpl courier-authlib-toaster-0.62.2-1.3.9.i386.rpm |grep libauthvchkpw Old package does. # rpm -qpl courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.2-1.3.6.i386.rpm |grep libauthvchkpw /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libauthvchkpw.a /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libauthvchkpw.la /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libauthvchkpw.so /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libauthvchkpw.so.0 /usr/lib/courier-authlib/libauthvchkpw.so.0.0.0 r...@mail:/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386 Also as a side note, I had to put --nodeps to install the latest authlib package because it was complaing that maildrop needed the libcourierauth.so.0 file. I went back to the old package. Using centos-release-4-7 i386. autorespond-toaster-2.0.5-1.3.4 clamav-toaster-0.95.1-1.3.27 control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.4 courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.2-1.3.6 courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.7 daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.3 ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.3 ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.3 isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.4 libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.3 libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.3 maildrop-toaster-2.1.0-1.3.6 qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.12-1.3.7 qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.3 qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.15 qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.15 ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.3 send-emails-toaster-0.5-1.3.4 simscan-toaster-1.4.0-1.3.0 spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5-1.3.14 squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.18-1.3.14 ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.5 vpopmail-toaster-5.4.17-1.3.4 vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.3 - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] tcp.smtp was changed on simscan update
According to the rpm's the file belongs to qmail-toaster. # rpm -q --whatprovides /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.15 the only package i updated was simscan-toaster to the latest 1.4.0 which doesn't know anything about this file (its probably part of the spec file) # rpm -ql simscan-toaster /usr/share/doc/simscan-1.4.0/AUTHORS /usr/share/doc/simscan-1.4.0/ChangeLog /usr/share/doc/simscan-1.4.0/INSTALL /usr/share/doc/simscan-1.4.0/README /usr/share/doc/simscan-1.4.0/TODO /usr/share/doc/simscan-1.4.0/ssattach.example /var/qmail/bin/simscan /var/qmail/bin/simscanmk /var/qmail/control/simcontrol /var/qmail/simscan is there a reason why tcp.smtp was updated by this package (even if it is in the spec file, shouldn't the qmail-toaster be doing the updates?) ??? - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] tcp.smtp was changed on simscan update
It is changed in the simscan spec file. qmail-toaster writes an initial tcp.smtp file but it does not understand options like NOP0FCHECK=1. Those options cannot be understood until simscan is installed, since they're in simscan, not qmail-toaster. Because of that the simscan package rewrites the tcp.smtp file when it will understand options like the above. If the qmail-toaster package made the changes the daemon would fail at that point and those that do not wish to install simscan-toaster would be left with a system that didn't work. I'll look into changing the spec file in the future so it does not overwrite existing tcp.smtp, until this become a problem. thanks, it was just odd to find out that emails from my local network started to fail after updating simscan and when i inspected the files that came with the simscan rpm it had no mention of tcp.smtp. - Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! - Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Reverse DNS checking to reduce spam.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote: I believe that spamdyke does this, and a lot more, including graylisting. Are you using spamdyke yet? If so, what's your configuration? Here is mine (i do not use qtp-plus): log-target=stderr log-level=info local-domains-file=/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts max-recipients=5 idle-timeout-secs=600 reject-empty-rdns reject-unresolvable-rdns reject-ip-in-cc-rdns reject-missing-sender-mx ip-whitelist-file=/home/vpopmail/etc/whitelist_ip greeting-delay-secs=5 dns-blacklist-entry=zen.spamhaus.org dns-blacklist-entry=bl.spamcop.net tls-certificate-file=/var/qmail/control/servercert.pem graylist-level=always graylist-dir=/home/vpopmail/graylisting graylist-min-secs=300 graylist-max-secs=1814400 config-dir=/home/vpopmail/graylisting/config_dir - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] /etc/mail/mailfilter - Anyone has a new one
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Randy Robbins rrobb...@n2thenet.com wrote: I found a mail filter in /et/mail that does alot of cool stuff but it doesnt work as is. I had to add a line to set the VHome varible but there is some logic that needs to be changed for nonexistant email addresses. Does anyone have a copy that has already been debugged? I am under a time crunch. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com this if part of maildrop. have you updated to the latest one? seems to work here. # rpm -q --whatprovides /etc/mail/mailfilter maildrop-toaster-2.0.3-1.3.5 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
[qmailtoaster] dspam + qmailtoaster
i found this website and i thought i'de share. from what i recall, i think the author (Lee R. Copp) is a member of this list. hopefully he will be able to chime in here. http://mail.michscimfd.com/dspam/ my question iscan this be done globally? i do not want to populate each users folder with their own .mailfilter. thanks. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] QControl 1.1-1.0.2 released
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Jake Vickers j...@v2gnu.com wrote: Happy New Year! We released a new version of QControl (and QControlPE) which now has some new features. You can now view log files and search for specific terms in the logs, as well as edit certain config files (such as spamassassin's local.cf, simcontrol, and the tcp.smtp file). Added the ability to add user aliases, and you will now notice a QControl icon in the /admin-toaster/ page to make it easier to administrate the system from one place. This version should also resolve the Cent 4.x and Cent 5.x incompatibility issue. Thanks to Joe Smith of Nebraska Networks, the package has now been tested on Cent 5 x64 as well. In other words, this version should work on Cent 4, Cent 5, and 64 but machines. Thanks to Joe Smith, Dave McDonald, and Ed Joseph for their suggestions As always, you can obtain a copy of QControlPE (Personal Edition) that allows you to control 1 (one) domain at qcontrol.v2gnu.com. Details for the full version are also located on that page where you may administrate as many domains as you want. Please note that when you purchase a copy of the full edition of QControl, that is for one server. We don't mind too much if you purchase a copy and put it on 2 or even 3 servers, but there is a guy out there (you know who you are) that purchased a (singular) copy and has it installed on 37 servers according to download logs. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com hi jake, can you make it so it is installable for people that does not use qmailtoaster-plus? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: Re: [qmailtoaster] Barracuda
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Dairenn Lombard dlomb...@broadspire.com wrote: Uh, huh? Maybe if you're dealing with fewer than 100 mailboxes or so, then, sure. But SpamAssassin has to be about the poorest performing spam filtering software I've ever used. regards, Dairenn Lombard Unix Systems Administrator BroadSpire 617 West 7th Street, Suite 601, LA, CA 90017 Phone: 213.986.1051 | Fax: 213.688.7791 | NOC: 888.262.6161x2 Web Ecosystem Marketing www.BroadSpire.com -Original Message- From: Josh Hopkins [mailto:josh.hopk...@schoolimprovement.com] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 1:08 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: Re: [qmailtoaster] Barracuda I really do agree with Eric. I cannot tell you how many barracuda appliances that I have returned for customers once they realize that they did not need them. Not much of a need for a barracuda if you have a qmailtoaster. Just my 2 cents. -Josh -Original Message- From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 2:02 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Barracuda Sysadmin wrote: I had Non-related problems with my Barracuda today, their Tech suggested setting qmail to send smtp through the barracuda: Here`s what they said: The Barracuda Spam Firewall can be configured to fully process either incoming or outgoing mail, but an inbound Barracuda may also be configured to relay outgoing mail simultaneously. The Barracuda still scans outgoing mail, but not as thoroughly as incoming mail. Outbound, relayed mail is scanned for everything except Recipient Verification, Spam Scoring, Bayesian, Attachment Filtering and the Tag/Quarantine regular expressions. This means outbound, relayed mail IS scanned for RBL checks, Rate control, Whitelist/Blacklist, Intent, Virus scanning, Fingerprinting (in firmware 3.4 and above), and Block regular expressions. As such, using an inbound Barracuda with Outbound Relay will increase the load on the Barracuda. Thanks Dave MacDonald Oh. I think I'd lose the barracuda. ;) -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com i believe barracuda uses spamassassin. barracuda is pretty much a server PC with spamassassin/clamav/postfix installed with an easy to use administration web ui. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] maildrop
i use it to filter messages from mailing lists to their own folders. its a pain when using different mua's and have to define filters for each of them. On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone doing anything with maildrop besides what is already included with the QMT packages? Just curious. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] anyone used atmail?
it seems pretty good. just wanted to see if anyone is using it. http://atmail.org/ - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fw: [qmailtoaster] RE: Sale 79% OFF !!!
you must be using some elite rules! i got it, i only use the openprotect rules. On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anil Aliyan wrote: Wonderful qmailtoaster mailing list itself recieves spam mail. mail attached below i recieved yesterday. - Original Message - From: Viagra Inc qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 4:24 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] RE: Sale 79% OFF !!! I didn't receive that message here. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] duplicate e-mail
i know i know someone will say search the archivesi did and i have actually tweaked my spamd run and config file as well as clamd.conf. i am using spamdyke 4.0.2. centos 4.6 on a desktop with AMD Athlon(TM) XP1500+ and 768 MB. it handles email for only 1 domain with very very little traffic. most traffic i get is the e-mail i get from this list. and actually i only see duplicate from this list. no other email is duplicated. load on the box is very low as well. server sits behind cablevision's optimum boost. # grep toaster /var/log/rpmpkgs autorespond-toaster-2.0.5-1.3.4.i386.rpm clamav-toaster-0.93.3-1.3.20.i386.rpm control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.4.noarch.rpm courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.2-1.3.6.i386.rpm courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.7.i386.rpm daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.3.i386.rpm ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.3.i386.rpm ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.3.i386.rpm isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.4.i386.rpm libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.3.i386.rpm libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.3.i386.rpm maildrop-toaster-2.0.3-1.3.5.i386.rpm maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.3-1.3.5.i386.rpm qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.15.i386.rpm qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.15.i386.rpm qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.11-1.3.4.i386.rpm qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.3.i386.rpm ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.3.i386.rpm send-emails-toaster-0.5-1.3.4.noarch.rpm simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.6.i386.rpm spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5-1.3.14.i386.rpm squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.15-1.3.10.noarch.rpm ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.5.i386.rpm vpopmail-toaster-5.4.17-1.3.4.i386.rpm vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.3.i386.rpm - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] duplicate e-mail
i used your tweaks dairenn http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg19000.html. and it looks like they are different PIDs. its also looking more like an issue with the list server. as the PIDs are different there too. 1st e-mail: Received: (qmail 22910 invoked by uid 89); 12 Aug 2008 19:31:52 - Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 22904, pid: 22905, t: 0.9734s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.93.3 dupe e-mail: Received: (qmail 22927 invoked by uid 89); 12 Aug 2008 19:33:24 - Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 22920, pid: 22921, t: 1.2227s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.93.3 On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My first reply on this thread came back to me twice! This is great. No need to wait for another dupe to show up. Dairenn Lombard wrote: -Original Message- From: slamp slamp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 1:21 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] duplicate e-mail i know i know someone will say search the archivesi did and i have actually tweaked my spamd run and config file as well as clamd.conf. i am using spamdyke 4.0.2. centos 4.6 on a desktop with AMD Athlon(TM) XP1500+ and 768 MB. it handles email for only 1 domain with very very little traffic. most traffic i get is the e-mail i get from this list. and actually i only see duplicate from this list. no other email is duplicated. load on the box is very low as well. server sits behind cablevision's optimum boost. What kind of tweaks? What are the simscan times in the full SMTP headers of the duplicate emails? 0.9056s on the first, 0.6422s on the second. Are the PID numbers identical or different in the full SMTP headers? Different. First one: Received: (qmail 27529 invoked by uid 89); 12 Aug 2008 20:58:09 - Second one: Received: (qmail 28190 invoked by uid 89); 12 Aug 2008 21:23:48 - Same Message-ID on both: Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp log from first: 08-12 13:58:08 tcpserver: status: 1/100 08-12 13:58:08 tcpserver: pid 27519 from 209.177.154.102 08-12 13:58:08 tcpserver: ok 27519 doris.shubes:192.168.171.11:25 :209.177.154.102::39147 08-12 13:58:08 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote ns2.qmailtoaster.com:unknown:209.177.154.102 rcpt : sender accepted 08-12 13:58:08 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote ns2.qmailtoaster.com:unknown:209.177.154.102 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 08-12 13:58:08 ALLOWED from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] origin_ip: 209.177.154.102 origin_rdns: www.qmailtoaster.com auth: (unknown) 08-12 13:58:09 simscan:[27520]:CLEAN (-2.50/8.00):0.9047s:Re_ [qmailtoaster] duplicate e-mail:209.177.154.102:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 08-12 13:58:09 tcpserver: end 27519 status 0 08-12 13:58:09 tcpserver: status: 0/100 smtp log from second: 08-12 14:23:47 tcpserver: status: 1/100 08-12 14:23:47 tcpserver: pid 28182 from 209.177.154.102 08-12 14:23:47 tcpserver: ok 28182 doris.shubes:192.168.171.11:25 :209.177.154.102::40166 08-12 14:23:47 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote ns2.qmailtoaster.com:unknown:209.177.154.102 rcpt : sender accepted 08-12 14:23:47 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote ns2.qmailtoaster.com:unknown:209.177.154.102 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 08-12 14:23:47 ALLOWED from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] origin_ip: 209.177.154.102 origin_rdns: www.qmailtoaster.com auth: (unknown) 08-12 14:23:48 simscan:[28183]:CLEAN (-2.50/8.00):0.6417s:Re_ [qmailtoaster] duplicate e-mail:209.177.154.102:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 08-12 14:23:48 tcpserver: end 28182 status 0 08-12 14:23:48 tcpserver: status: 0/100 Everything looks normal to me. I'm guessing that the sending server isn't getting acknowledgement of receipt. I'd sure like to see the send log on the server that's handling the list. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] deferral: Aack,_child_crashed._(#4.3.0)
Anyone know why this is happening? stopping and starting qmail did not fix it. reboot did. 07-10 20:21:06 status: local 3/10 remote 0/60 07-10 20:21:07 delivery 25: deferral: Aack,_child_crashed._(#4.3.0)/ 07-10 20:21:07 status: local 2/10 remote 0/60 07-10 20:21:07 delivery 28: failure: Aack,_child_crashed._(#4.3.0)/I'm_not_going_to_try_again;_this_message_has_been_in_the_queue_too_long./ 07-10 20:21:07 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60 07-10 20:21:07 bounce msg 1704558 qp 30258 07-10 20:21:07 end msg 1704558 07-10 20:21:07 delivery 27: deferral: Aack,_child_crashed._(#4.3.0)/ 07-10 20:21:07 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 CentOS release 4.6 (Final) toaster packages: autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.3.i386.rpm clamav-toaster-0.93.3-1.3.20.i386.rpm control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.4.noarch.rpm courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.2-1.3.6.i386.rpm courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.7.i386.rpm daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.3.i386.rpm ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.3.i386.rpm ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.3.i386.rpm isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.4.i386.rpm libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.3.i386.rpm libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.3.i386.rpm maildrop-toaster-2.0.3-1.3.5.i386.rpm maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.3-1.3.5.i386.rpm qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.15.i386.rpm qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.15.i386.rpm qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.11-1.3.4.i386.rpm qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.3.i386.rpm ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.3.i386.rpm send-emails-toaster-0.5-1.3.4.noarch.rpm simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.6.i386.rpm spamassassin-toaster-3.2.5-1.3.14.i386.rpm squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9.noarch.rpm ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.5.i386.rpm vpopmail-toaster-5.4.17-1.3.4.i386.rpm vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.3.i386.rpm - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamassassin Headers Problem
if you have a customized /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp file, make sure you make a backup of it. It wiped it out on mine on simscan re-install On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Roxanne Sandesara wrote: Jake, Eric, et al: Any thoughts about what I should attempt at this point? If I need to do some uninstalls and re-installs of packages, I can attempt that tonight after business hours. Is it still actually scanning the message? You may just need to rebuild the simscan package and reinstall it. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] SpamDyke downside?
what about a spec file? :-) On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just for the record, I agree with everything Sam says here. (Not that it matters much ;) ) Sam Clippinger wrote: spamdyke has no flaws, I thought everyone knew that. :) Perhaps I should update the FAQ. To answer your questions: Once enabled, spamdyke's graylist filter will block anything that isn't explicitly whitelisted, including newsletters, mailing lists, etc. Some mailing lists (depending on the mailing list software) use tagged senders, which means that every message appears to come from a different sender. This is done so that bounced messages can be more easily matched with a specific mailing list and recipient. (Ezmlm and Yahoo lists both use tagged senders. Mailman does not. I'm not sure about Listserv and Majordomo.) For those kinds of lists, every message is graylisted. This isn't really a problem however, as the remote server will simply retry delivery and the message will be received. The QMT list uses tagged senders and I receive its messages just fine. Some users may complain about the (small) delay, however. I'll probably incorporate some heuristics in a future version of spamdyke to allow mailing lists with tagged senders to bypass graylisting (but it may be a while before that's done). Online ticket orders, receipts, password verifications and other automated messages should pass the graylist filter as long as they are being sent from a real mail server. In other words, as long as the remote server attempts to redeliver the message, it will be received. Graylisting works fine with all of the major email hosts and every mail server I've ever encountered. An SSL certificate is only needed for using TLS (an encryption protocol that allows email to be sent securely). Only one certificate can be installed on a server (one per domain is not possible) but you don't have to pay for it -- a self-signed certificate works just fine. The sender and recipient blacklists are just text files, so editing them is very easy. The graylist system uses a directory structure that contains files named after the senders and recipients. It's not as easy to edit manually (nor is it difficult) but you shouldn't ever need to. spamdyke has no mechanism for saving rejected messages. It works by rejecting the message before the remote server even sends it, so spamdyke never sees its content. For that reason, it is not possible to recover rejected messages. However, spamdyke does log the sender and recipient addresses for every message (accepted or rejected), along with the reason the message was rejected. This does make it possible to determine if a delivery was attempted and why it failed. Obviously, I've been using spamdyke for years now with no problems. spamdyke has an active mailing list (subscribe at www.spamdyke.org) with many helpful and responsive people. You should probably pose these questions there to see what they have to say. -- Sam Clippinger Kent Busbee wrote: I've heard so many good things about spamdyke, I am wondering what flaws it might have. From my understanding greylisting is the key to its success. -Will it block wanted newsletters, email lists, email subscriptions? Or will it greylist the first attempt and then deliver the next a day, week, or month later. -Will it unintentionally prevent things like online tickets orders, receipts from online orders, password verifications, etc. -Does it work well with the major online email systems accepting emails from gmail, yahoo, hotmail, etc. -Do you need an Certificate SSL for your site? For each site hosted? -Is it easy to tweek the lists? Move an address/domain from greylist to whitelist or blacklist? -If a message is lost/rejected/greylisted, is it possible to pull it back and deliver it? -What other problems/unexpected results did you get from installing? -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] SPF failed to work?
I thought that SPF checked MAIL FROM? The email has this: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] So shouldn't SPF be checking mydomain.com ? However below is what it checked: Received-SPF: none (mail.mydomain.com: domain at jrasup.freeserve.co.uk does not designate permitted sender hosts) This domain is seen in: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] So is SPF functionality in qmail failing at this instance? Here is the full message source: Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 31150 invoked by uid 89); 24 Apr 2008 06:38:52 - Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 31142, pid: 31143, t: 1.4063s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.93/m:46/d:6849 spam: 3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on mail.mydomain.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,MISSING_DATE, MISSING_HB_SEP,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no version=3.2.4 Received: from unknown (HELO unnasigned-reverse-242.140.hertza.ro) (89.165.242.140) by mail.mydomain.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2008 06:38:50 - Received-SPF: none (mail.mydomain.com: domain at jrasup.freeserve.co.uk does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-Originating-IP: [68.6.5.41] X-Originating-Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Subject: 2008 Designer Shoes Collection from Gucci Ugg Prada Chanel Dsquared Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ladies and Gentlemen, Get Ready for.. Thought I would let you know about the Fashion Footwear SPRING Sale! Men and Women Designer Shoes, Heels, Sandals and Boots, All Half-OFF, Buy Direct, Forget Department Store Prices, Get Exclusive 2008 DG, Gucci, Versace, Prada, Chanel, Christian Dior, Dsquared, Uggs and More! FREE International Shipping on all Orders! http://www.fluid-creations.com/sale/ - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] SPF failed to work?
There is no relation between these domains. jrasup.freeserve.co.uk is a spammer. i guess it sucks that the MAIL FOM from the outside is not being taken into account. How can we prevent this kind of spam? On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think I follow entirely, but I'll try to explain. slamp slamp wrote: I thought that SPF checked MAIL FROM? The from on the 'envelope', not the from on the inside. The email has this: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On the inside. That one doesn't matter. So shouldn't SPF be checking mydomain.com ? Nope. However below is what it checked: Received-SPF: none (mail.mydomain.com: domain at jrasup.freeserve.co.uk does not designate permitted sender hosts) This domain is seen in: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's the sender's envelope address. So is SPF functionality in qmail failing at this instance? No, it's checking the envelope sender's domain, as it should. Is mydomain.com being relayed through jrasup.freeserve.co.uk or something? What is the relationship between these domains? Here is the full message source: Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 31150 invoked by uid 89); 24 Apr 2008 06:38:52 - Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 31142, pid: 31143, t: 1.4063s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.93/m:46/d:6849 spam: 3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on mail.mydomain.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,MISSING_DATE, MISSING_HB_SEP,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no version=3.2.4 Received: from unknown (HELO unnasigned-reverse-242.140.hertza.ro) (89.165.242.140) by mail.mydomain.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2008 06:38:50 - Received-SPF: none (mail.mydomain.com: domain at jrasup.freeserve.co.uk does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-Originating-IP: [68.6.5.41] X-Originating-Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Subject: 2008 Designer Shoes Collection from Gucci Ugg Prada Chanel Dsquared Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ladies and Gentlemen, Get Ready for.. Thought I would let you know about the Fashion Footwear SPRING Sale! Men and Women Designer Shoes, Heels, Sandals and Boots, All Half-OFF, Buy Direct, Forget Department Store Prices, Get Exclusive 2008 DG, Gucci, Versace, Prada, Chanel, Christian Dior, Dsquared, Uggs and More! FREE International Shipping on all Orders! http://www.fluid-creations.com/sale/ - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] Rule2XSBody
with all the e-mails going on about spamassassin, has anyone used this at all and have success with it? http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_Rule2XSBody.html - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] timeline to update spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4
is there a reason why one would enable RBL checking in spamassassin? isn't this done already and wouldn't it be redundant? On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I figured out the problem. This problem explains several things, including why it was necessary to remove spamassassin before upgrading. That should no longer be the case, and I will be making that change to qtp-newmodel soon. The fixed spec with the source package is attached. md5sum is: e93f7ec0515c6484ff8def5699245c03 spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.14.src.rpm Please give it a shot. Confidence is high that it will work, with and without qtp-newmodel. New installs will appreciate that rbl and urisurbl checking is turned on by default, as in the stock SA package. If you upgrade and would like these features turned on, simply check the .rpmnew files in the configuration directory. P.S. Sorry for the large attachment on the list. Eric Shubert wrote: I'll be dang. I just recreated it on my test box (w/ same perl and COS4.6 as Helmut). Strange thing is, I already have spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13 installed on that box. Go figure. Let me see if I can figure out what's going on now. From what I can tell so far, the /etc/ directory isn't created by makeinstall after all. Stay tuned. Helmut Fritz wrote: The report is nice because of you all asking for the details... I just try to not have folks need to repeat themselves. Hopefully I can remember all this stuff if needed again! :) I have recently (last week and this weekend) upgraded the entire box to prep to qmt upgrade... [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep ^perl- perl-HTML-Tagset-3.03-30 perl-XML-Parser-2.34-5 perl-Digest-HMAC-1.01-13 perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA-0.21-1.2.el4.rf perl-HTML-Parser-3.35-6 perl-libwww-perl-5.79-5 perl-5.8.5-36.el4_5.2 perl-Net-DNS-0.48-2.el4 perl-suidperl-5.8.5-36.el4_5.2 perl-Digest-SHA1-2.07-5 perl-Time-HiRes-1.55-3 perl-Filter-1.30-6 perl-DBI-1.40-8 perl-URI-1.30-4 perl-DateManip-5.42a-3 perl-DBD-MySQL-2.9004-3.1.centos4 -Original Message- From: Eric Shubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 2:06 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] timeline to update spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4 That's a nice report, Helmut. So the problem appears to be that /var/tmp/spamassassin-toaster-root/etc/mail/ directory doesn't exist. Looking at the .spec file, this should be created by %makeinstall. So on we go to the Makefile. The Makefile is generated by MakeMaker, so we need to look at Makefile.PL. While I'm thinking of it, what version of perl (et al) are you running? # rpm -qa | grep ^perl- Helmut Fritz wrote: Ah well, I thought it was worth a try. Upgraded qtp-plus to 0.3.0, still get: + install -m 0644 /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/qmailtoaster.local.cf.bz2 /var/tmp/spamassassin-toaster-root/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf.bz2 install: cannot create regular file `/var/tmp/spamassassin-toaster-root/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf.bz2 ': No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.29617 (%install) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.29617 (%install) I find no mail directory in /mnt/qtp-sandbox/var/tmp/spamassassin-toaster-root/etc/ as reported before. I do find /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/qmailtoaster.local.cf.bz2. (is the script looking outside of the sandbox for some reason?) MD5Sum from file in /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/SRPMS [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]# md5sum spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13.src.rpm 3d0936eeccebc3476910330d60a42b93 spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13.src.rpm And that files contents: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]# rpm -qpl spamassassin-toaster*.src.rpm Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.4.tar.bz2 filter-requires-spamassassin.sh qmailtoaster.local.cf.bz2 qmailtoaster.v310.pre.bz2 spamassassin-toaster.spec supervise.spamd.log.run.bz2 supervise.spamd.run.bz2 Last few bits of the log file: /usr/bin/sa-learnX' = X ']' + find /var/tmp/spamassassin-toaster-root/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/Mai l /var/tmp/spamassassin-toaster-root/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/spa massas sin-run.pod -type d -print + sed '[EMAIL PROTECTED]/var/tmp/[EMAIL PROTECTED] @g' + rm -f + /var/tmp/spamassassin-toaster-root/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf + rm -f + /var/tmp/spamassassin-toaster-root/etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre + install -d /var/tmp/spamassassin-toaster-root/etc + install -d /var/tmp/spamassassin-toaster-root/etc/cron.hourly + install -d + /var/tmp/spamassassin-toaster-root/var/qmail/supervise/spamd + install -d
Re: [qmailtoaster] timeline to update spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4
succesful build on CentOS 4.6. i don't use the newmodel scripts. 3d0936eeccebc3476910330d60a42b93 spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13.src.rpm rpm-build-4.3.3-23_nonptl On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Helmut Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That is interesting - same as ES's... But I am running qtp-newmodel and it downloads this stuff from the toaster site, right? -Original Message- From: Erik A. Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 1:55 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] timeline to update spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4 3d0936eeccebc3476910330d60a42b93 spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13.src.rpm On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Helmut Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry for the double posting... My md5sum (if I took it from the right place - seems correct to me) - different from ES's. md5sum /opt/qtp-sandbox/var/qmt/spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.8.src.rpm 528f4ea8d8a91d642494c3ffb96c7b7f /opt/qtp-sandbox/var/qmt/spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.8.src.rpm -Original Message- From: Helmut Fritz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 11:26 AM To: 'qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com' Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] timeline to update spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4 My versions from cache: /var/cache/yum/base/headers/rpm-build-4.3.3-22_nonptl.i386.hdr /var/cache/yum/base/packages/rpm-build-4.3.3-22_nonptl.i386.rpm Running COS4.6. To recap, I get the install: cannot create regular file and found the file missing from the source directory (unless the build process cleans it up when it exits???). -Original Message- From: Eric Shubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 9:58 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] timeline to update spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4 Peculiar indeed. I just had a peek at the spec file, and I didn't see any way this could be happening (not that I can see anywhere near everything). This feels to me like something really off the wall. Perhaps we should check md5sums on the package. The one I have that just built (again) successfully is: 3d0936eeccebc3476910330d60a42b93 spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13.src.rpm which checks out with the one currently on the web site. It might not hurt to check rpm-build versions either. I really doubt this would be an issue, but let's cover the bases. I'm running (successfully) with rpm-build-4.3.3-23_nonptl (on COS4.6). Erik A. Espinoza wrote: This is very peculiar. The file is included in the src.rpm. I can pull it up by typing rpm -qpl spamassassin-toaster*.src.rpm. I can't seem to replicate this on FC6 or CentOS 4. As of right now we haven't added support for FC8, so I can't confirm this. Erik On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Erik A. Espinoza wrote: Is anyone having this problem on CentOS 5 that is not using the qtp-newmodel? I just set up a fresh box and no issues here. Erik Did a fresh install on CentOS-5 last night and did not encounter the issue, which I thought strange since I've experienced it on FC6, F8, and CentOS-4. I did not use qtp-newmodel on any of those installations, so that's not a factor. All had the same error, with the local.cf.bz2 file missing. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Mails going to junk folder of hotmail when sent from qmail
i also found somewhere that adding a the below TXT entry into your DNS helps with hotmail issues. try it out and let me know if it works. it works for me at least. IN TXT spf2.0/pra On Feb 12, 2008 12:41 AM, senthil vel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is SPL?. We have set up sender policy framework. v=spf1 ip4:x.x.x.x ip4:x.x.x.x1 a mx ~all this is parameter we put in TXT record and is the ip address of two mail servers where mails from these server has been routed to antispam firewall Our IP is having a reverse DNS entry. We tried all type of internet connections. Even from various geographical locations. Thanks. Senthilvel - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] catchall delete logs
hi everyone, is there a way to better improve logging of catchall deleted e-mails? in the log it shows that it has been delivered which should say that it was deleted because it doesn't exist. also if it is going to delete the e-mail anyway why does it have to go through simscan? can it be delete at smtp level? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] mail server is flooded with user not found
It seems that my mail server was attacked yesterday. I have already blacklisted the IP. My question is, how can I prevent this from happening? I do not need smtp access to my server remotely and i do not have remote users. All e-mail transactions are done through webmail and/or in my internal lan.Thanks for any suggestions. Dec 27 10:36:40 mail vpopmail[25597]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 Dec 27 10:36:40 mail vpopmail[25599]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 Dec 27 10:36:48 mail vpopmail[25609]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 Dec 27 10:36:49 mail vpopmail[25612]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 Dec 27 10:36:49 mail vpopmail[25611]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 Dec 27 10:36:49 mail vpopmail[25615]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 Dec 27 10:36:49 mail vpopmail[25617]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 Dec 27 10:36:49 mail vpopmail[25619]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 Dec 27 10:36:49 mail vpopmail[25621]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 Dec 27 10:36:49 mail vpopmail[25623]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] mail server is flooded with user not found
i do not think qmail supports tcp_wrappers that is used by the system. it uses its own tcpserver so blockhosts will not work for me. On Dec 28, 2007 11:48 AM, Harry Zink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not quite the same as the vpopmail slamming you are getting, but I eliminated nearly all the brute force efforts at local login accounts via the use of BlockHosts: http://www.aczoom.com/cms/blockhosts Maybe there's something similar, or an extension for it, to include vpopmail slamming? Harry On Dec 28, 2007, at 9:42 PM, slamp slamp wrote: It seems that my mail server was attacked yesterday. I have already blacklisted the IP. My question is, how can I prevent this from happening? I do not need smtp access to my server remotely and i do not have remote users. All e-mail transactions are done through webmail and/or in my internal lan.Thanks for any suggestions. Dec 27 10:36:40 mail vpopmail[25597]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 Dec 27 10:36:40 mail vpopmail[25599]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 Dec 27 10:36:48 mail vpopmail[25609]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 Dec 27 10:36:49 mail vpopmail[25612]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 Dec 27 10:36:49 mail vpopmail[25611]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 Dec 27 10:36:49 mail vpopmail[25615]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 Dec 27 10:36:49 mail vpopmail[25617]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 Dec 27 10:36:49 mail vpopmail[25619]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 Dec 27 10:36:49 mail vpopmail[25621]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 Dec 27 10:36:49 mail vpopmail[25623]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:207.234.146.154 - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] squirrelmail packages compromised!
they mentioned that both 1.4.11 and 1.4.12 were compromised. there should be a changelog file in the squirrelmail directory that tells you what version you are running. On Dec 18, 2007 1:26 PM, Jim Shupert, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Might you tell me how I can determine what version of qmt and or squirrelmail we might be running? and what is the problem - just with squirrelmail ? Thanks j - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 12:45 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] squirrelmail packages compromised! I'm using qmt-iso 1.3.1 for my install. What is the best way of updating? Due to the package compromise of 1.4.11, and 1.4.12, we are forced to release 1.4.13 to ensure no confusions. While initial review didn't uncover a need for concern, several proof of concepts show that the package alterations introduce a high risk security issue, allowing remote inclusion of files. These changes would allow a remote user the ability to execute exploit code on a victim machine, without any user interaction on the victim's server. This could grant the attacker the ability to deploy further code on the victim's server. We STRONGLY advise all users of 1.4.11, and 1.4.12 upgrade immediately. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] squirrelmail packages compromised!
ANNOUNCE: SquirrelMail 1.4.13 Released Dec 14, 2007 by Jonathan Angliss Due to the package compromise of 1.4.11, and 1.4.12, we are forced to release 1.4.13 to ensure no confusions. While initial review didn't uncover a need for concern, several proof of concepts show that the package alterations introduce a high risk security issue, allowing remote inclusion of files. These changes would allow a remote user the ability to execute exploit code on a victim machine, without any user interaction on the victim's server. This could grant the attacker the ability to deploy further code on the victim's server. We STRONGLY advise all users of 1.4.11, and 1.4.12 upgrade immediately. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] mta statistics
have you guys seen this? http://www.mailradar.com/mailstat/ i thought qmail was 2nd? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] is there a way to prevent receiving mailer-daemons not caused by my server?
I received the mailer-daemon below but the original message was not sent by me. i have spf set and the server that sent me the mailer-daemon failed the SPF check but still allowed for the mail to go through. Received-SPF: fail (mail300.opentransfer.com: SPF record at domain.com does not designate 88.2.65.102 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=88.2.65.102; envelope-from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Received: from unknown (HELO mail300.opentransfer.com) (76.162.254.73) by mail.domain.com with SMTP; 1 Dec 2007 16:50:57 - Received-SPF: none (mail.domain.com: domain at mail300.opentransfer.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 17084 invoked for bounce); 1 Dec 2007 16:50:54 - Date: 1 Dec 2007 16:50:54 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=1196527851mail300.opentransfer.com167116 Subject: failure notice --1196527851mail300.opentransfer.com167116 Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail300.opentransfer.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) --- Enclosed are the original headers of the message. --1196527851mail300.opentransfer.com167116 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 17038 invoked by uid 399); 1 Dec 2007 16:50:51 - Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 17028 invoked by uid 399); 1 Dec 2007 16:50:50 - X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on mail300.opentransfer.com X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MISSING_DATE autolearn=disabled version=3.2.1 Received: from unknown (HELO eduardo) (88.2.65.102) by mail300.opentransfer.com with ESMTP; 1 Dec 2007 16:50:50 - X-Originating-IP: 88.2.65.102 Received-SPF: fail (mail300.opentransfer.com: SPF record at domain.com does not designate 88.2.65.102 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=88.2.65.102; envelope-from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Received: (qmail 3822 by uid 299); Sat, 1 Dec 2007 05:50:40 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: November 71% OFF From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit (Body supressed) --1196527851mail300.opentransfer.com167116-- - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmail is officially public domain
this means no more building on your own. you no longer need build tools installed on your mail server (those of us with no dev server). you only need to yum intall the qmail packages and yum update when new packages are in! On Nov 30, 2007 8:57 AM, Warren Melnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What does that mean for this project and similar ones? Not that all of the common patches can be rolled into qmail itself and configured with switches (in files, etc). Any thoughts? W On Nov 30, 2007 4:53 AM, Harry Zink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FINALLY! Great news, indeed. Binary distributions are now finally a reality. If anything, this can only breathe renewed life and vigor into qmail. Harry On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:38 AM, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH wrote: http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html http://www.ornl.gov/lists/mailing-lists/qmail/2007/11/msg00069.html I think, that's good news for the further development of qmail! Shouldn't it now be possible to publish binary distributions of the toaster packages!? Johannes -- |- | weberhofer GmbH | Johannes Weberhofer | information technologies | Austria, 1080 Wien, Blindengasse 52/3 |--- - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Squirrelmail plugins missing?
On Nov 26, 2007 2:33 PM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jake Vickers wrote: Has anyone else noticed that the account administration plugin is missing from Squirrelmail? I have 2 servers this is evident on, 1 QMT-ISO machine and one manually installed machine, both running squirrelmail 1.4.9a-1.3.6. Can anyone else confirm or deny this? Thanks. It actually looks like the whole plugins directory is missing. Anyone else have this issue, or am I all alone? I have squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.10a-1.3.7 and I have the plugins directory and my administration plugin is working fine. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.14-1.3.17 is out!
when this is installed, does it make any changes to the current system? i am currently using the older backup/restore scripts. btw, i havent seen any emails from eric shubes, is he still around? On Nov 25, 2007 1:52 PM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fresh out of the oven is qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.14-1.3.17! Okay, not totally fresh. I finished it yesterday but it was my birthday I took a trip up to the Blue Ridge Parkway with my wife and my 4-week old son. As always, the package is available at the main site: http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com BIG news: QTP is now available via a yum repo! That's right, download and install my repo and you will be able to yum install qmailtoaster-plus into your system. Updates will be easy when new stuff comes out. I'll still continue to make the RPMs available on the main site, but this will be the future of QTP. The repo package is available at the main site, or here: http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/download/repo/qmailtoaster-plus.repo-0.1-1.noarch.rpm A few bug fixes for QTP, and a couple new features. watchall and cwatchall have been added to QTP, as well as a few other things. Here's the new parts of the changelog: 11/24/07 - Jake [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Created a package to install the qmailtoaster-plus.repo - into yum 11/22/07 - Jake [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Created man pages for qmailtoaster-plus 11/21/07 - Jake [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Made a Yum repo for qmailtoaster-plus 11/16/07 - Jake [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Updated the script to download the new version - of Roundcube and also fix a few other minor issue, like my if-then logic. - Everything seemed to install correctly, but I did not do any testing other - than that. 10/30/08 - Jake [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Changed cp -rf to cp -af in the restore script to - retain the time stamps of the messages when restoring. Thanks to - Aaron Spurlock for that one! 10/25/07 - Jake [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fixed a bug with the qtp-newmodel script where the reorganization - was not happening correctly. - Also have it install procmail if needed to meet a spamassassin dep. - Added a routine place holder for a dep check routine to be used in the future. - Added watchall and cwatchall to the QTP package (installable) 10/24/07 - Jake [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Updated qtp-clean-trash to allow for a control file (thanks to - Davide Bozzelli). Davide Bozzelli also submitted an updated - SaneSecurity script that will check for a lock file, not restart - clamav if no updates, and made the clam restart quiet for cron jobs 10/15/07 - Jake [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fixed -t option in qmlog (contributed by Eric 'Shubes') As a side note, if anyone has a script to count the number of downloads made via a yum repo (parsing the httpd logs), please let me know. It's something that would save me time if you already have something like this or are willing to whip something up for me to save some time. If anyone has any suggestions or comments (or fixes) for QTP or any of it's parts, please contact me off-list and let me know. Enjoy! (A new version of QMT-ISO will be out soon) - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Delivery delay when restarting spamassassin
spamassassin is fine on my server but then again i only use the stock spamassassin and openprotect rules. On Nov 12, 2007 7:08 AM, PakOgah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am not having problem with SA but with clamav, I get soft-reject everytime I restart my server (it's a Pentium III with memory less than 1GB) but the same clamav version on the higher spec server run smoothly so I think I need to upgrade my memory, so clamav can load its database faster :) Is anyone else noticing a delay in Spamassassin when it's been restarted? I updated some rules and restarted the spam daemons and have noticed a 10-30 second delay before the system will start processing messages again. During the downtime, the following error is generated on the sending system: 2007-11-11 19:15:47.688524500 delivery 87: deferral: User_and_password_not_set,_continuing_without_authentication./[EMAIL PROTECTED]_214.157.139.30_failed_after_I_sent_the_message./Remote_host_said:_451_mail_server_temporarily_rejected_message_(#4.3.0)/ And then the following is generated on the system I restarted the spam daemon on: 2007-11-11 19:15:47.103810500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote ns1.vickersconsulting.net:unknown:226.155.149.14 rcpt : sender accepted 2007-11-11 19:15:47.231903500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote ns1.vickersconsulting.net:unknown:226.155.149.14 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2007-11-11 19:15:47.649518500 connect(): No such file or directory 2007-11-11 19:15:47.651227500 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Has anyone else noticed this behavior? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Can't relay from internal servers?
you need something like this: 192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,RBLSMTPD=,SENDER_NOCHECK=1,NOP0FCHECK=1 On Nov 6, 2007 8:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So really, it's looking like I need to create DNS records for all of the internal machines also then? For internal use only? I'm thinking this because on the compdev machine, I tried nslookup for itself and it fails. Am I overlooking a simpler way of doing this? I just need internal machines to be able to send email out using the QMT machines. Mike On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 00:04:56 -0500, Tim Mancour wrote: Perhaps a look at http://www.nrg4u.com/qmail/the-big-qmail-picture-103-letter.pdf would be helpful in answering your latter questions. What do you get when you execute the following command on the server that gives you the error: host -t mx compdev.domain.com - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 10:37 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] Can't relay from internal servers? I need to send out using a central server. I've set up tcp.smtp to allow a full private net but machines on that net still can't send out using the QMT machine? Here is the error. (domain.com replaces real name) 2007-11-05 21:31:16.914013500 CHKUSER rejected sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote compdev.domain.com:unknown:192.168.1.58 rcpt : invalid sender MX domain Why would an MX record be used internally? When I check from DNS-STUFF for example, my MX's show up just fine. PS: It is also not 100% clear to me if my defaulthost and defaultdomain files should have anything in them. For example, one QMT server handles a number of domains while another handles only one domain. Neither has these files filled in based on something I read. Can someone enlighten me on this. Thanks. Mike - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] smtp-auth
thanks everyone for the clarification. On 10/2/07, Janno Sannik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: port 25 doesn't require but accepts authentication. That means if youre not in tcprules then you need to auth. If you are , you don't need to auth and can relay as you just asked. slamp slamp wrote: quick question, does the standard port 25 in qmailtoaster support/requires authentication? i know port 587 requires authentication. so if i add my local network in tcp.smtp, i should be able to relay without authentication? like so: 192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,RBLSMTPD=,SENDER_NOCHECK=1,NOP0FCHECK=1 - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] smtp-auth
quick question, does the standard port 25 in qmailtoaster support/requires authentication? i know port 587 requires authentication. so if i add my local network in tcp.smtp, i should be able to relay without authentication? like so: 192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,RBLSMTPD=,SENDER_NOCHECK=1,NOP0FCHECK=1 - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] esp-eng - Move partition /home at new disk
you will have to do this yourself manually. best way is to boot the server into a CD. setup the new disk, mount to a temp dir and copy all files from /home to the temp dir. (cp -a should do it, i like to use rsync -avv). On 10/1/07, Ariel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: List, I need, to put a disc but great since to me this being small. The idea is to only move the /home partition to the new disc Like podria to do it? there is something in qmail to toaster for that? / Lista, necesito, poner un disco mas grande ya que me esta quedando chico. La idea es mover solamente la particion /home al disco nuevo Como podria hacerlo? hay algo en qmail toaster para eso? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] squirrel rules
If you are using a current qmailtoaster, this should be automatic. but
if you are using an old qmailtoaster, mailfilter was broken and i had
to put this in my .mailfilter file.
cat /home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com/user/.mailfilter
if (/^Subject:.*(SPAM)/ )
{
exception {
to $VHOME/Maildir/.Spam/
}
}
On 9/17/07, Sergio Minini {NETKEY} [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey there!
I set up a rule in my webmail with squirrel to send all msgs tagged **SPAM**
to the Trash. But I found out that I downloaded all the mails with
Thunderbird and the rule only did run when I logged in to squirrel.
So, is there a way to apply the filters when messages arrive to my user
inbox, w/o login in to squirrel or downloading the messages with POP3?
Thanks! Sergio
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] cron not working as expected
well if you are concerned about time and want to update it every minute why not just run the ntp daemon? thats how i have mine setup. On 8/26/07, Basura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you are right. * * * * * is every minute. In fact, if I change the command to echo x /txt it writes a new line every minute at /txt, but the /usr/sbin/ntpdate time.nist.gov /dev/null 21 dose not work. FK Jean-Paul van de Plasse escribió: Just curious why is it set to never run? * * * * * would normally be every minute.. JP - Original Message - From: Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 9:44 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] cron not working as expected Basura wrote: Hi all, My qmail is the latest qmailtoaster plus ISO. I need to run the following cron as root * * * * * /usr/sbin/ntpdate time.nist.gov /dev/null 21 /usr/sbin/ntpdate time.nist.gov is executed perfectly at the console, but as a cronjob using crontab it doesn´t work. It's set to never run. It needs to be something like: 35 * * * * /usr/sbin/ntpdate time.nist.gov What I do on my machines is create a script: #!/usr/sh # updatetime script /usr/sbin/ntpdate time.nist.gov And drop it into my /etc/cron.hourly folder and make it executbale (chmod +x /etc/cron.hourly/updatetime). You shouldn't need to update the time more than once an hour. If it's getting more than a couple thousandths of a second off in an hour you either have a motherboard issue or one that has a REALLY cheap clock. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Submission port 587
are you using the latest qmailtoaster? i don't remember when but submission port 587 was only added on the later versions of qmailtoaster. check if you have anything running on port 587. $ netstat -tapn | grep 587 tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:587 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN - On 8/21/07, Basura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I can do pop3, imap, webmail and smtp to port 25. Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH escribió: Has your qmail-system been started and is it still running? Johannes Basura schrieb: Thanks Im doing this /etc/init.d/iptables stop then telnet localhost 587 Trying 127.0.0.1... telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Connection refused telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused Any clue why 587 is not working? thanks Lucian Cristian escribió: Basura wrote: Hi all! How can I test if submisson port works? Is there a test I can do inside my server console? Have tried by changeing in my thunderbird the port 25 to 587 and it can´t get conected. Thanks - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] first of all test telnet 587, and if it working grep into /var/log/qmail/submission/current - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Server Down
i created a ticket on Tuesday, 17 July 2007, 17:10 GMT-7 related to this. On 8/3/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm gonna open a ticket in the bug tracker so that 1.4 branch includes a maildrop logrotate script. Erik On 8/3/07, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Erik A. Espinoza wrote: Note to all, this problem was caused because the maildrop.log file hit 2 gigs. MIght want to add this to the faq. Never ran into that one before Thanks. I'll make a note on the FAQ this weekend. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Upgrade using qtp-newmodel but terminal crashed
this is one good reason to use gnu screen. On 8/2/07, Erik Grammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Jake. I was expecting the script to continue running on the server even though my session was killed but I started qtp-newmodel again and it picked up just prior to building the sandbox. Thanks for the help. -erik On 8/2/07, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Erik Grammer wrote: Hello all, Was upgrading qmailtoaster using qtp-newmodel with the latest version of qmailtoaster-plus. I was doing this remotely via ssh when the computer I was working on crashed. The sandbox was in the process of being rebuilt. How can I restore the terminal session to continue answering the prompts? Or do I need to kill it somehow and restart? Chances are real good that the old session will close in a minute or so. You'll just restart then. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] ClamAv 0.91.1
i just installed this also and it fixed the issue i was having with connect() failure. On 7/17/07, Phil Leinhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just read what I typed before... I meant to say Is that the fix to the CPU hogging we discussed a few weeks ago. You figured it out though. I'll have to give it a shot now and hope for the best. -Original message- From: A M [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:07:54 -0400 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] ClamAv 0.91.1 Aparently so. It's been running for a couple of hours in 6 servers... I've monitoring the servers for a while and it looks good! 2007/7/17, Phil Leinhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is that a fix to the CPU hogging we a few weeks ago month? -Original message- From: A M [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:05:11 -0400 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] ClamAv 0.91.1 Just reporting the good news :) takes less than 10 seconds to load the signatures on any server!!! and it works fine too!!! -- AM agmsoft(at)gmail.com - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- AM agmsoft(at)gmail.com - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] clamav updated.
just wondering when we'll get an srpm for this new clamav. WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! WARNING: Local version: 0.90.2 Recommended version: 0.91 i am hoping this will fix the connect(): No such file or directory i have whenever qmail or the actual server is restarted. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Runtime problems on Mandrake 2007.1
if you had to edit spec files just to run on your system, then your system is not supported. you come over here asking for questions like we should fix your problem. you should not be bashing someone just because they said to use a compatible os. and actually, mail::domainkeys was part of the installation for perl modules. On 7/15/07, Nigel Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's the sum of your complete knowledge of qmail-toaster? The best advice you can give me is to change my operating system? THanks, bud, for a useless response. --- Harry Zink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 14, 2007, at 5:34 AM, Nigel Reed wrote: Any help would be very much appreciated at this stage. Only suggestion I can make is to run it on a Centos system - I used to run Mandrake, but found it to be too 'customized' for server use. It's cute, and neat as a client installation, and I still look at it occasionally, but Centos has proven rock-solid and, most of all, compatible and reliable. Get the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email wherever you're surfing. http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/index.php - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] new toaster, external messages not coming
what version of clamav are you using? there has been an issue with clamav delay in startup. also are all the services running? post output of: qmailctl stat On 6/26/07, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had found (thus far) no other references to issues other that the originally posted excerpt from my smtp log file. I am still looking though On 6/26/07, A M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: check your logs. it could be something wrong with clamav or spamassasin. 2007/6/26, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi there, I just setup a new toaster (with the plus packages) with Centos 5, but for some reason when i sent an email to my test user, it is never delivered yet no bounce back. So I ran the command: # qmlog smtp -lc [EMAIL PROTECTED] I then found output like this: 06-26 11:14:50 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: remote gw.mydomain.com:unknown:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx rcpt : sender accepted 06-26 11:14:50 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote gw.mydomain.com:unknown:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 06-26 11:14:50 connect(): No such file or directory 06-26 11:14:50 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Does anyone have any idea as to what file or directory it might be referring to? DNK -- AM agmsoft(at)gmail.com - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info
i get the delay too. Erik said to recompile simscan but that didn't seem to work. On 6/21/07, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I didn't recognize this problem. The only thig I saw was the log delay at start-up. Johannes Phil Leinhauser schrieb: Hi Johannes, I'm not sure about the rest of the folks here but the problem I was seeing is the CPU is pegged at 99% by clamd for about the first 5 minutes of the machine startup. If it was network or name resolution I wouldn't expect it to take CPU time. Those would just make updates slow. I did however just double check my DNS settings and they are OK. I don't see any problems with any of the other servers and the bandwidth monitor doesn't show any problems. Phil -- |- | weberhofer GmbH | Johannes Weberhofer | information technologies | Austria, 1080 Wien, Blindengasse 52/3 |--- - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info
the issue i am having is that the communication between simscan and clamd is not immediate. i have to wait at least two minutes for mail to start coming in. connect(): No such file or directory by the way, spamassassin 3.2.1 and 3.1.9 are out. when can we see them for the current toaster? On 6/18/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is very peculiar. I have not been able to reproduce any of the clamav problems stated on this list. Perhaps we need to start doing profiling and submitting issues to the clamav group. Thus far I have ten different production boxes running the latest clamav (some x86_64, some centos4 and one centos3) with no adverse activiity. In addition, I am running a full spamassassin 3.2.0 with no issues. I did have to yum install a bunch of perl modules from rpmforge repo to get everything working properly though. Erik On 6/18/07, Phil Leinhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Clamd ver 90.1 hogged my CPU indefinitely. I had to stop it to et the machine back. After my upgrade problems (self induced), I see what you are talking about. I haven't looked at what it is doing exactly but it runs for me at 100% for about 5 minutes then calms down. My QMT server is a VMware virtual server running on an AMD 3.0G host along with 2 other virtual servers all using iSCSI connection to Linux iSCSI target. Vmachines are so cheap I chose not to run anything but QMT on this server. Running webs etc. on my mail server will certainly overload it once I go into full production. I'm willing to live with a 5 minute spike in CPU as long as it does it's job. Phil -Original message- From: A M [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:05:41 -0400 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Clam 0.90.3 - Updated Info Hi, I just had a server downgrade (due to a fried processor) fom a 3.2 GHz to a 2.6GHz and from 4GB Ram to 2GB ram and noticed this: when starting clamd loads the entire database to memory while doing some sort of checksum verification??? anyone can verify this??? the server has about a zillion sites on it plus some other services besides QMT. The result is that clamd loads de signatures for about 2 minutes hoging the CPU during this time, and fails to respond to simscan, originating deferals for smtp. At this point I did som test in other servers and I realized that 90.3takes a lot more time to read the signatures than previous versions. Well just my experience since I've seen a lot of pelople with some issues with 0.90.3. Regards, -- AM agmsoft(at)gmail.com - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] [Fwd: RE: 404 while getting RDJ updates?]
it is part of the qmailtoaster-plus. if you have that installed and configured then you need to disable it. otherwise don't do anything. On 6/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is Rules du Jour something that is 'on' by default with Qmail toaster or is it an option you enable after the install? Chas. For an update Looks like everyone should stop using Rules du Jour until further notice. Original Message Subject: RE: 404 while getting RDJ updates? Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 12:11:55 -0400 From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Jim Maul' [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 12:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 404 while getting RDJ updates? guenther wrote: On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 17:45 +0200, Anders Norrbring wrote: Anyone else getting 404 errors from RDJ lately? Yes, this topic came up just a few hours ago. Probably a dDOS attack. Please disable all RDJ till further notice. guenther I would imagine this is related to www.uribl.com and surbl.org having issues as well. Both are now pointing to 127.0.0.1 in what I would assume was an attempt to stop the attack. Some spammer is pissed off it seems... Its true, scanners indicate klingon war vessels approaching our sector. We've dropped out of warp due to overuse of the dilythium crystals. Federation starships have been called in for assistance. Scottie has given us more power, but is not sure she will hold together much longer. All the while Ensen Alex won't stop dancing with a half naked green lady! Thanks, Chris Santerre SysAdmin and Spamfighter www.rulesemporium.com www.uribl.com - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Clamav upgrade to 0.90.3
: up (pid 2924) 442 seconds imap4-ssl: up (pid 2938) 442 seconds pop3: up (pid 2927) 442 seconds pop3-ssl: up (pid 2937) 442 seconds send: up (pid 2959) 442 seconds smtp: up (pid 2922) 442 seconds spamd: up (pid 2926) 442 seconds submission: up (pid 2929) 442 seconds authlib/log: up (pid 2939) 442 seconds clamd/log: up (pid 2932) 442 seconds imap4/log: up (pid 2931) 442 seconds imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 2940) 442 seconds pop3/log: up (pid 2933) 442 seconds pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 2936) 442 seconds send/log: up (pid 2928) 442 seconds smtp/log: up (pid 2930) 442 seconds spamd/log: up (pid 2925) 442 seconds submission/log: up (pid 2923) 442 seconds On 6/3/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how did you manage to update? my toaster broke after upgrading to the new clamav 0.90.3. 2007-06-03 21:59:51.388989500 tcpserver: status: 0/100 2007-06-03 22:04:27.781227500 tcpserver: status: 0/100 2007-06-03 22:06:14.848932500 tcpserver: status: 1/100 2007-06-03 22:06:14.848938500 tcpserver: pid 4399 from 167.206.4.199 2007-06-03 22:06:14.902173500 tcpserver: ok 4399 mail.mydomain.com:172.16.133.4:25 :167.206.4.199::64785 2007-06-03 22:06:15.121824500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net:unknown:167.206.4.199 rcpt : sender accepted 2007-06-03 22:06:15.192784500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net:unknown:167.206.4.199 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2007-06-03 22:06:15.294420500 connect(): No such file or directory 2007-06-03 22:06:15.295600500 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-03 22:06:15.308939500 tcpserver: end 4399 status 256 2007-06-03 22:06:15.308945500 tcpserver: status: 0/100 2007-06-03 22:11:41.211648500 tcpserver: status: 0/100 2007-06-03 22:12:17.737201500 tcpserver: status: 1/100 2007-06-03 22:12:17.737207500 tcpserver: pid 22314 from 167.206.4.199 2007-06-03 22:12:17.737210500 tcpserver: ok 22314 mail.mydomain.com:172.16.133.4:25 :167.206.4.199::34602 2007-06-03 22:12:17.763705500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net:unknown:167.206.4.199 rcpt : sender accepted 2007-06-03 22:12:17.783909500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net:unknown:167.206.4.199 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2007-06-03 22:12:17.807075500 connect(): No such file or directory 2007-06-03 22:12:17.808201500 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-03 22:12:17.826070500 tcpserver: end 22314 status 256 2007-06-03 22:12:17.826076500 tcpserver: status: 0/100 On 6/3/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: service qmail cdb Erik On 6/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well I've just been able to update with the ClamAV 0.90.3 package (on a CentOS 4.5 box) and all is well so far. could anyone tell me the command to run to get Simscan to see show the newer version in email headers? Thanks, Chas. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
Re: [qmailtoaster] Clamav upgrade to 0.90.3
how did you manage to update? my toaster broke after upgrading to the new clamav 0.90.3. 2007-06-03 21:59:51.388989500 tcpserver: status: 0/100 2007-06-03 22:04:27.781227500 tcpserver: status: 0/100 2007-06-03 22:06:14.848932500 tcpserver: status: 1/100 2007-06-03 22:06:14.848938500 tcpserver: pid 4399 from 167.206.4.199 2007-06-03 22:06:14.902173500 tcpserver: ok 4399 mail.mydomain.com:172.16.133.4:25 :167.206.4.199::64785 2007-06-03 22:06:15.121824500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net:unknown:167.206.4.199 rcpt : sender accepted 2007-06-03 22:06:15.192784500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net:unknown:167.206.4.199 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2007-06-03 22:06:15.294420500 connect(): No such file or directory 2007-06-03 22:06:15.295600500 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-03 22:06:15.308939500 tcpserver: end 4399 status 256 2007-06-03 22:06:15.308945500 tcpserver: status: 0/100 2007-06-03 22:11:41.211648500 tcpserver: status: 0/100 2007-06-03 22:12:17.737201500 tcpserver: status: 1/100 2007-06-03 22:12:17.737207500 tcpserver: pid 22314 from 167.206.4.199 2007-06-03 22:12:17.737210500 tcpserver: ok 22314 mail.mydomain.com:172.16.133.4:25 :167.206.4.199::34602 2007-06-03 22:12:17.763705500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net:unknown:167.206.4.199 rcpt : sender accepted 2007-06-03 22:12:17.783909500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net:unknown:167.206.4.199 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2007-06-03 22:12:17.807075500 connect(): No such file or directory 2007-06-03 22:12:17.808201500 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-03 22:12:17.826070500 tcpserver: end 22314 status 256 2007-06-03 22:12:17.826076500 tcpserver: status: 0/100 On 6/3/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: service qmail cdb Erik On 6/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well I've just been able to update with the ClamAV 0.90.3 package (on a CentOS 4.5 box) and all is well so far. could anyone tell me the command to run to get Simscan to see show the newer version in email headers? Thanks, Chas. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Clamav upgrade to 0.90.3
forgot to mention that machine was rebooted. clamd was running. i reverted to the old version and things are working again. # qmailctl stat authlib: up (pid 2935) 442 seconds clamd: up (pid 2934) 442 seconds imap4: up (pid 2924) 442 seconds imap4-ssl: up (pid 2938) 442 seconds pop3: up (pid 2927) 442 seconds pop3-ssl: up (pid 2937) 442 seconds send: up (pid 2959) 442 seconds smtp: up (pid 2922) 442 seconds spamd: up (pid 2926) 442 seconds submission: up (pid 2929) 442 seconds authlib/log: up (pid 2939) 442 seconds clamd/log: up (pid 2932) 442 seconds imap4/log: up (pid 2931) 442 seconds imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 2940) 442 seconds pop3/log: up (pid 2933) 442 seconds pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 2936) 442 seconds send/log: up (pid 2928) 442 seconds smtp/log: up (pid 2930) 442 seconds spamd/log: up (pid 2925) 442 seconds submission/log: up (pid 2923) 442 seconds On 6/3/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how did you manage to update? my toaster broke after upgrading to the new clamav 0.90.3. 2007-06-03 21:59:51.388989500 tcpserver: status: 0/100 2007-06-03 22:04:27.781227500 tcpserver: status: 0/100 2007-06-03 22:06:14.848932500 tcpserver: status: 1/100 2007-06-03 22:06:14.848938500 tcpserver: pid 4399 from 167.206.4.199 2007-06-03 22:06:14.902173500 tcpserver: ok 4399 mail.mydomain.com:172.16.133.4:25 :167.206.4.199::64785 2007-06-03 22:06:15.121824500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net:unknown:167.206.4.199 rcpt : sender accepted 2007-06-03 22:06:15.192784500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net:unknown:167.206.4.199 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2007-06-03 22:06:15.294420500 connect(): No such file or directory 2007-06-03 22:06:15.295600500 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-03 22:06:15.308939500 tcpserver: end 4399 status 256 2007-06-03 22:06:15.308945500 tcpserver: status: 0/100 2007-06-03 22:11:41.211648500 tcpserver: status: 0/100 2007-06-03 22:12:17.737201500 tcpserver: status: 1/100 2007-06-03 22:12:17.737207500 tcpserver: pid 22314 from 167.206.4.199 2007-06-03 22:12:17.737210500 tcpserver: ok 22314 mail.mydomain.com:172.16.133.4:25 :167.206.4.199::34602 2007-06-03 22:12:17.763705500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net:unknown:167.206.4.199 rcpt : sender accepted 2007-06-03 22:12:17.783909500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net:unknown:167.206.4.199 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2007-06-03 22:12:17.807075500 connect(): No such file or directory 2007-06-03 22:12:17.808201500 qmail-smtpd: qq soft reject (mail server temporarily rejected message (#4.3.0)): MAILFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RCPTTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-03 22:12:17.826070500 tcpserver: end 22314 status 256 2007-06-03 22:12:17.826076500 tcpserver: status: 0/100 On 6/3/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: service qmail cdb Erik On 6/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well I've just been able to update with the ClamAV 0.90.3 package (on a CentOS 4.5 box) and all is well so far. could anyone tell me the command to run to get Simscan to see show the newer version in email headers? Thanks, Chas. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] define spambox
i don't understand how this option is not default since the mailfilter script has been fixed by mark samples if i remember correctly. On 5/28/07, Glenn Remstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 12:55 -0400, Jake Vickers wrote: Glenn Remstedt wrote: hello list, I've just try out to rebuild my QTP with the --define 'spambox 1' and then running the 'qtp-newmodel'. I then log-in to Qmailadmin and look for the checkbox: spam detection but I can't find it - where should it be located? Did you rebuild qmailadmin with the option? http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/FAQs#I_upgraded_my_QmailToaster_to_the_latest_and_I_no_longer_have_the_.22Spam_Detection.22_box_in_Qmailadmin. I used the: echo --define 'spambox 1' /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/etc/rpmbuild/qmailadmin-toaster - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] define spambox
it is not set as default. just rebuild qmailadmin manually and add --define 'spambox 1' . i dont use qtp so i dont know how it works with that. On 5/28/07, Glenn Remstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if that should be set as default, how to determine that? On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 14:29 -0400, slamp slamp wrote: i don't understand how this option is not default since the mailfilter script has been fixed by mark samples if i remember correctly. On 5/28/07, Glenn Remstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 12:55 -0400, Jake Vickers wrote: Glenn Remstedt wrote: hello list, I've just try out to rebuild my QTP with the --define 'spambox 1' and then running the 'qtp-newmodel'. I then log-in to Qmailadmin and look for the checkbox: spam detection but I can't find it - where should it be located? Did you rebuild qmailadmin with the option? http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/FAQs#I_upgraded_my_QmailToaster_to_the_latest_and_I_no_longer_have_the_.22Spam_Detection.22_box_in_Qmailadmin. I used the: echo --define 'spambox 1' /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/etc/rpmbuild/qmailadmin-toaster - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] spamassassin + domainkeys.
thanks that makes alot of sense. On 5/23/07, davide bozzelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: slamp slamp ha scritto: I saw that an extra module has been added to the v310.pre config. Does this replace the buggy qmail-dk? The qmail-dk works at mta-level, meaning BEFORE simscan call spamc (and then spamassassin) . The spamassassin domainkeys plugin works al spamd level( the spamassassin daemon) , so if the message arrives to spamassassin it adds the domainkeys checks as part of it's spam checks , and then it adds the domainkeys check score to the scores of the other spam checks . Hope it helps, have fun, Davide - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] spamassassin + domainkeys.
I saw that an extra module has been added to the v310.pre config. Does this replace the buggy qmail-dk? ### # experimental plugins # DomainKeys - perform DomainKeys verification # # External modules required for use, see INSTALL for more information. # loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DomainKeys - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] CentOS 4.5
thanks fuzzy, i will do an upgrade and update here if all goes well. On 5/18/07, fuzzy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2007 3:44 pm, slamp slamp wrote: CentOS 4.5 just came out, I'm not sure if anyone has upgraded their 4.4 boxes yet but if you did please do tell if it went smoothly and if toaster is affected or not Thanks. smooth upgrade to 4.5 here on the 18th (early morning)...courtesy of a cron'ed yum -y upgrade...oops, i should change that. about 200 packages on my box were upgraded/installed including a new kernel. currently running on the new kernel. toaster operation not affected...however, YMMV. -- fuzzy (toasting since 04/2006) Current stable + Erik's updates Centos 4.4-32bit-the easy way - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailmrtg for submission
there is a bug report on this. http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/flyspray/?do=detailstask_id=10 On 5/19/07, PakOgah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: talking about submission port, I am notice there is no qmailmrtg for submission port. submission port is just the same with smtp right? but without rblsmtpd and using port 587 that's way I am just copy paste smtp's mrtg config. does this trick enough to add chart for submission's mrtg? and is it valid also ? vi /usr/share/toaster/mrtg/mrtg.cfg #--- Title[submission]: FQDN - Qmail (submission concurrency) MaxBytes[submission]: 100 AbsMax[submission]: 500 Options[submission]: gauge Target[submission]: `/usr/bin/qmailmrtg t /var/log/qmail/submission` PageTop[submission]: font face=arial size=3BFQDN/B - Qmail (submission)/fontbr ShortLegend[submission]: submission YLegend[submission]: submission Legend1[submission]: submission LegendI[submission]: nbsp;smtp: LegendO[submission]: WithPeak[submission]: ymwd #--- vi /usr/share/toaster/htdocs/mrtg/index.php tr td colspan=2 bgcolor=#007700bfont color=#ffnbsp;Submission:/font/b /td /tr tr td colspan=2 align=centerbr ? print parse_mrtg (submission.html ); ? br /td /tr - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] CentOS 4.5
upgrade went smoothly and toaster is still working as it was. On 5/19/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thanks fuzzy, i will do an upgrade and update here if all goes well. On 5/18/07, fuzzy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2007 3:44 pm, slamp slamp wrote: CentOS 4.5 just came out, I'm not sure if anyone has upgraded their 4.4 boxes yet but if you did please do tell if it went smoothly and if toaster is affected or not Thanks. smooth upgrade to 4.5 here on the 18th (early morning)...courtesy of a cron'ed yum -y upgrade...oops, i should change that. about 200 packages on my box were upgraded/installed including a new kernel. currently running on the new kernel. toaster operation not affected...however, YMMV. -- fuzzy (toasting since 04/2006) Current stable + Erik's updates Centos 4.4-32bit-the easy way - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] CentOS 4.5
CentOS 4.5 just came out, I'm not sure if anyone has upgraded their 4.4 boxes yet but if you did please do tell if it went smoothly and if toaster is affected or not Thanks. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailtoaster as spam/anti-virus appliance.
one more question related to this. Scenario I am looking for: INCOMING: internet - qmailtoaster - internal mail server. OUTGOING: internal mail server - qmailtoaster - internet. at the moment, I route all my mail through my ISP since I have a dynamic ip. my smtproute file contains: :mail.optonline.net what would I need to add? would this work? :mail.optonline.net mydomain.com:internal ip with this setup does qmail know to use my ISP for outgoing and mydomain.com for relay? thanks. On 5/3/07, Davide Bozzelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jake Vickers wrote: slamp slamp wrote: Would this work with the qmailtoaster setup? URL: http://rauros.net/projects/qmail/smtproute.php Guide: Configuring qmail to remotely clean e-mail Yep. The guide on the wiki (I think it's on there) for a backup MX is almost exactly the same. I think to be a fairly good spam appliance toaster must have some sort of recipients verification checks different from chkuser . While chkuser is good for locally hosted domains, it's not usable for smtp gateways wich does not have any local domain . Would be useful if toster could incorporate the:validrcptto.cdb patch: ( http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/validrcptto.cdb.shtml ) or the spamcontrol rcpt verification patch . Have fun, Davide - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] qmailtoaster as spam/anti-virus appliance.
Would this work with the qmailtoaster setup? URL: http://rauros.net/projects/qmail/smtproute.php Guide: Configuring qmail to remotely clean e-mail Lets say you have four domains: localemail.tld, computers.tld, websites.tld, and servers.tld. You want to let them handle their own mail, but you want a centralized location for all of their spam/virus services. No problem! qmail handles this easily. In your /var/qmail/control directory: me should contain your qmail gateway's hostname. locals should contain a listing of all of the domains for which your server will locally be accepting mail. If you don't plan on handling local mail on the machine, your locals file should be empty. For example: localemail.tld defaultdomain should contain your domain name. rcpthosts should have a listing (one per line) of the domains you are accepting mail for. For example: computers.tld websites.tld servers.tld smtproutes should contain something like domain.tld:ipaddress. This works with both internal or external IP addresses. So, for example, you could have the following: computers.tld:64.123.232.214 websites.tld:192.168.1.5 servers.tld:130.4.4.21 Seeing as this is going to be a gateway that will endure double bounces from spammers, it would be very useful to take advantage of one of qmail's configuration files and set up doublebounce configuration in the /var/qmail/control directory: doublebouncehost contains your domains. doublebounceto contains doublebounce. The alias /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-doublebounce should contain just a hash (#), or octothorpe, as the contents, which will send the mail to /dev/null. Congratulations! You now have a qmail gateway which will accept incoming messages, scan/filter/strip the messages, and pristinely forward them on to an internal or external SMTP server. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Messages from this list not getting through
domainkeys is broken in QMT install. The latest version of QMT disables this by default. The recommended action is to disable domainkeys altogether. search the archives for the procedure. On 4/25/07, Warren (mailing lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am having a lot of messages bounced from this list. For instance, yesterday I only receive one message. When I get the bounce probe from the server, it typically tells me that the bounce looks like this: Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16218 invoked for bounce); 3 Apr 2007 11:39:29 - Date: 3 Apr 2007 11:39:29 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: failure notice Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ns2.qmailtoaster.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 69.123.15.116 failed after I sent the message. Remote host said: 554 DomainKeys verify status: bad format (#5.3.0) Does this mean that my machine is rejecting the message because qmailtoaster.com's domain keys are thought to be incorrect? Thanks, in advance, Warren - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] availibility clamav 0.90.2 ?
i just installed this on my server and it seems to be functioning fine. dont see any errors. On 4/23/07, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I will start testing the latest clamav devel packages for clamav tomorrow, because it seems to be impotant to use it as you can see below. Did anybody see problems related to the latest version? http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20070413.012951.1d50edff.en.html Excerpt: **Important note**: on April 16th CHM, CAB and PDF handlers will be disabled for 0.90 and 0.90.1 users through the dynamic engine configuration module (DCONF). Please upgrade to 0.90.2 immediately. Best regards, Johannes Weberhofer -- |- | weberhofer GmbH | Johannes Weberhofer | information technologies | Austria, 1080 Wien, Blindengasse 52/3 |--- - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] Certificate
Looking at this wiki. It says I can use the same SSL certificate for apache. How would this work when my qmail is mail.domain.com and my apache is www.domain.com? Isn't the cert tied to a common name? Unless if using a wildcard which I don't think is a feature of that $9.99 certificate. http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Certificate
Re: [qmailtoaster] General SPF Questions
send your self an e-mail from an external account, check the headers and you should see something like this: *Received-SPF:* none (mail.mydomain.com: domain at optonline.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) And you can also test from sites like http://www.seoconsultants.com/tools/spf/ On 3/30/07, Ron Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have SPF setup on my qmailtoaster and it appears to be working correctly since all mail is getting through. However, I am just wondering where I can see that it is being checked and working correctly. Does the SPF checking add anything to the header of an email? I don't think it does but I'm not positive. Is there a log file on my qmailtoaster where I can see responses to other mail servers that are checking the SPF? Any log file that shows the SPF is functioning correctly? I looked at the wiki and searched the list archives, but did not come up with answers. Thanks. Ron Allison - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with smtproute
This might be what you are looking for SENDER_NOCHECK=1 ... I have it setup like so in my tcp.smtp file. 192.168.1.5:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,SENDER_NOCHECK=1 On 3/12/07, Brian Trudeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Previously I had it setup so email for a specific domain which has no real MX record would get forwarded to a internal only mail server. Now it fails the MX lookup, is there a way to disable this check for just this domain or does it need to be disabled for system wide?
Re: [qmailtoaster] DomainKeys failed with no key
the only problem with your statement is that i do not send any messages from my domain to the toaster list. ive subscribed it to the toaster list so i can get a constant e-mail flow. On 3/6/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: slamp slamp wrote: Can anyone tell me why this is so? Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4571 invoked for bounce); 22 Feb 2007 13:56:12 - Date: 22 Feb 2007 13:56:12 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: failure notice Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ns1.qmailtoaster.com http://ns1.qmailtoaster.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 69.xxx.xx.xxx failed after I sent the message. Remote host said: 554 DomainKeys verify status: no key (#5.3.0) I thought my tcp.smtp had a safe default. Should it be DKVERIFY=dEgIJKfh instead? What is the safest rule? # cat tcp.smtp 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT= 172.16.133.3:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,SENDER_NOCHECK=1 208.11.75.2:allow,SPFBEHAVIOR=1 216.90.171.2:allow,SPFBEHAVIOR=1 :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=10,DKVERIFY=DEgIJKfh,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan,DKQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/qmail- queue.orig,NOP0FCHECK=1 # dig _domainkey.mydomain.com TXT I'm guessing that your DNS record indicates that messages from your domain should be signed, but you have no DKSIGN variable in your tcp.smtp, so messages don't have signatures. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] DomainKeys failed with no key
Can anyone tell me why this is so? Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4571 invoked for bounce); 22 Feb 2007 13:56:12 - Date: 22 Feb 2007 13:56:12 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: failure notice Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ns1.qmailtoaster.com. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 69.xxx.xx.xxx failed after I sent the message. Remote host said: 554 DomainKeys verify status: no key (#5.3.0) I thought my tcp.smtp had a safe default. Should it be DKVERIFY=dEgIJKfh instead? What is the safest rule? # cat tcp.smtp 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT= 172.16.133.3:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,SENDER_NOCHECK=1 208.11.75.2:allow,SPFBEHAVIOR=1 216.90.171.2:allow,SPFBEHAVIOR=1 :allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=10,DKVERIFY=DEgIJKfh,QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan,DKQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/qmail- queue.orig,NOP0FCHECK=1
Re: [qmailtoaster] User: clamav Process: clamd using 99.9% of Resources
try the clamd package in the devel site. i think this was resolved in that update. On 3/5/07, Francisco Paco Peralta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a problem I hope I can get some guidance on. I did an update (using qtp-menu) this weekend and everything seemed to have gone right. This morning I noticed my server was running slow and I discovered that clamd was using 99.9% of the resources. I rebooted my server but the problem still continues. Any suggestions on how to stop this runaway process if appreciated. Francisco Paco Peralta
Re: [qmailtoaster] DEVEL PACKAGES: isoqlog-toaster, spamassassin-toaster
On 2/26/07, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Eric Shubes wrote: I'm no expert with this, but I would think that the following rule should have assigned a negative value: * 4.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list In spamassassin-toaster-3.1.7-1.3.6, I see the rule for AWL in /usr/share/spamassassin/60_awl.cf, but I don't see any scoring in the 50_scores.cf file. AWL just tries to keep messages it's seen before at the same score the last message was at. If I send you a message and it gets a score of 3, the next time I send you a message and it only scores a 1.4, AWL will add .8 to it, trying to get it back to the 3 score. I thin it does half of the remainder It just tries to average to lessen any spikes it sees in messages from people that it's seen before. Slamp, you may want to try dumping your current AWL list and start teaching it again. I realized what had happened why it was thinking it was spam from AWL. I sent an SURBL test just before sending a plane message. So the average still thought it was spam even though the last message was not (this is a flaw i think). I wanted to dump it but I didn't know the proper way of doing that. I didn't know if I should be able to just delete the file and restart spamd.
Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock
I have clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 with no problems either. this was an upgrade from the rc. but i do see duplicates in my log. the oldest i have for logs are from 2/14. i am curious as to why the logs are duplicated. On 2/26/07, Philip Nix Guru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Eric Shubes wrote: Philip Nix Guru wrote: Eric Shubes wrote: Philip Nix Guru wrote: Eric Shubes wrote: Philip Nix Guru wrote: Eric Shubes wrote: We're trying to get a handle on this problem. If anyone is using clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 and is *not* experiencing a problem, will you kindly reply and let us know? Thanks. Hello I am using clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 on 3 diff systems 2 x FC5 and 1 x Centos 4.4 No problem .. But I am not using default simscan, I added configure option --enable-dropmsg which shouldnt change anything to clamd's behavior -P Hey PNG, I've got a few questions for you. .) Are you seeing duplicated messages in clamd log? .) Were these upgrades or new installs? If upgrades, .) had you upgraded to RC version(s) first? .) what version did you upgrade from? .) manual upgrade or qtp-newmodel? .) any other packages upgraded at the same time? Hello Yes I see duplicated messages in clamd log It was an upgrade I had clamav-toaster-0.90rc2-1.3.8.src.rpm then upgraded to clamav-toaster-0.90rc3-1.3.9.src.rpm then to clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10.src.rpm manual upgrade No other packages upgraded at the same time Thanks, PNG. Can you tell with which version the duplicated messages began? (by looking through the logs?) Hey Eric I did check the logs, unfortunatly those are busy servers , logs from earlier versions arent accessible anymore (I dont backup clamd logs) sorry cant help much there ... That's ok. Just curious about that. It's starting to look like the problem might only rear it's head when there are concurrent scans happening. Can you tell if you've had two messages being scanned at once? Checked a few things, never had 2 messages scanned at once ... as far as I know :) will check source later and upgrade another server I have (not a toaster but running clamav 0.88.x) - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] DEVEL PACKAGES: isoqlog-toaster, spamassassin-toaster
The new spamassassin seems to be very sensitive. My test e-mail was flagged spam for this new version when it wasn't flagged for the old one. I only have the default installed, no extra sarules. message was sent from optonline webmail with subject hello and body check the header. Here is the header. Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 11491 invoked by uid 89); 25 Feb 2007 16:42:11 - DomainKey-Status: no signature Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 11483, pid: 11484, t: 0.2802s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.90/m:42 spam: 3.1.8 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on mail.domain.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.7 required=5.0tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_SHORT_LENGTH,NO_REAL_NAME,SUB_HELLO autolearn=no version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Report: * 1.8 SUB_HELLO Subject starts with Hello * 0.6 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name * -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.6 HTML_SHORT_LENGTH BODY: HTML is extremely short * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 4.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Received: from unknown (HELO mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net) (167.206.4.199) by mail.domain.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2007 16:42:10 - Received-SPF: none (mail.domain.com: domain at optonline.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: from optonline.net (mstr3a.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [10.240.4.140]) by mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:42:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.240.3.201] (Forwarded-For: 69.115.89.201, [10.240.3.201]) by mstr3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mshttpd); Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:42:07 + (GMT) Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:42:07 + (GMT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ***SPAM*** hello To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006) Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Boundary_(ID_eCg+BywmgH8Vv36bzQPEWA) Content-language: en X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal X-Spam-Prev-Subject: hello On 2/25/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings, I have released a couple of packages on the devel site. Full ChangeLog on the site: http://devel.qmailtoaster.com Thanks, Erik - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] caching dns + openDNS
anyone using openDNS for their caching dns (bind or djbdns). if so what are your thoughts?
Re: [qmailtoaster] Installation on Ubuntu
don't they all use the same kernel drivers? if your machine is new, fedora6 should be able to handle it, or compile your own kernel from vanilla. On 2/10/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gabriel, There is no support for Debian based distributions. Good Luck, Erik On 2/9/07, Gabriel Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Have anyone tried installation on Ubuntu? I would like to use this distro for QT, as Centos nor FC works on my machine, due to hardware incompatibility. Please comments Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and always stay connected to friends. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] squirrelmail and submission port
It would lessen the number of login/logout in your imap4 (or imap4-ssl) log. I get really long logwatch e-mail because of the number of login/logout that SM does. On 2/8/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not really. When all connections are localhost, it doesn't really help. It does help big time for other machines. Erik On 2/8/07, Peter Peltonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/7/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I usually run imapproxy on the different host and all goes well. Looks like a useful thingie this imapproxy. Would it be useful to use the proxy even if Qmail and Squirrelmail are on the same server? If so and it works, speeds up things and is stable, I'd like to see it as a QMT RPM... Regards, Peter - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] squirrelmail and submission port
Thanks Erik, imapproxy is nice!! Eric, This would be a good addon to qtp. On 2/7/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Slamp Eric, I have done this once, SM on a different host from QT. That was REALLY SLOW even on a 100mbps connection. So I just decided to implement proxy in apache and now it's alot faster. I usually run imapproxy on the different host and all goes well. Erik - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] squirrelmail and submission port
Is there a reason why the default config of squirrelmail is not using the submission port? Is it really necessary for squirrelmail to be checked against RBL's? I found that squirrelmail is much faster (sending) when configured to use the submission port since it bypasses RBL checks. This also prevents the error Server replied: 354 when an RBL timeout occurs. BTW I just updated to the latest and greatest including the 3 devel packages and everything is perfect (knocks on wood). Thanks.
[qmailtoaster] toaster as internal relay.
Hi list, I have different linux servers that are internal only but would like to use toaster as the relay. Basically I do not want any mail residing on the local linux servers. So far I've allowed the IP of my linux servers in tcp.smtp (same as 127 line) and able to relay to the toaster ONLY if I rewrite the from address. I do not want to rewrite because I would like to be able to tell where the mail is coming from (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Below is the error message I get. 2007-02-05 19:39:38.952825500 tcpserver: status: 0/100 2007-02-05 19:40:44.788782500 tcpserver: status: 1/100 2007-02-05 19:40:44.788788500 tcpserver: pid 31891 from 192.168.1.3 2007-02-05 19:40:44.788791500 tcpserver: ok 31891 external.domain.com:192.168.1.4:25 :192.168.1.3::56139 2007-02-05 19:40:45.884438500 CHKUSER rejected sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote internal.lan.com:unknown:192.168.1.3 rcpt : invalid sender MX domain 2007-02-05 19:40:45.908143500 tcpserver: end 31891 status 0 FYI: I do not have an internal DNS where I could setup an MX record for internal.lan.com.
[qmailtoaster] courier-authlib updated/fixed.
Just a heads up I guess. I haven't yet upgraded to the courier-authlib-toaster-0.59 http://www.qmailtoaster.com/download/stable/courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.src.rpm thinking this package will get updated soon enough. 0.59.1 2007-01-16 Mr. Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] * authldaplib.c (l_simple_bind_s): Fix anon binds.
Re: [qmailtoaster] error in squirrel mail
On 1/22/07, Kisakye Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Everyone! Today my toaster has been returning the following error when trying to send mail from the squirrel web client! I have not made changes to the compose file at all! Squirrel returns the error :: Server replied: 354 and the error below is from /var/log/httpd/error_log [Mon Jan 22 14:59:19 2007] [error] [client 193.108.254.105] PHP Notice: Undefined property: Deliver_SMTP::$dlv_server_msg in /usr/share/squirrelmail/src/compose.php on line 1592, referer: http://webmail.ucu.ac.ug/src/compose.php?mailbox=INBOXstartMessage=1 Am running FC 5 Thanks ALex I've had that error message come up before too. It was due to the blacklists I have defined. Have you updated your blacklists file ever since you installed the toaster? There are a few rbl's that are not in use anymore. This is what I have. # cat /var/qmail/control/blacklists -r zen.spamhaus.org -r opm.blitzed.org -r cbl.abuseat.org -r list.dsbl.org
Re: [qmailtoaster] Invalid recipient bounces
So basically no one should be using catch-all mailboxes? On 1/21/07, Alexey Loukianov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: George Sweetnam wrote: You shouldn't set the catchall to bounce though... select delete. The dictionary attacks will harvest the valid users if you select bounce! Agreed. Accordingly to the latest SMTP/MTA RFCs, all mail, directed to the non-existing addresses should be bounced in SMTP session. To prevent harvest attacks SMTP daemons may implement tarpeting. In case catchall address is used, NO bounces should be sent back? but RFCs recommends against using catchall, as it makes your mailserver act as a black hole. Violating the rules above will shortly result in blacklisting your server by services like SpamCop and RFC-Ignorant. -- Best regards, Alexey Loukianov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] System Engineer, IT Department, Lavtech Corp. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] smtproutes and domainkeys, spf, srs
How did you get domainkeys working in this setup?? When I set my domainkeys awhile ago, gmail or yahoo always said bad keys. and I was told here on the list that it wont work because the headers are changed/updated by the smtp server in smtproute. On 1/16/07, Vince Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 16:43 -0800, Trung Pham wrote: Any idea guys? Is it worth it setup SPF, SRS, and domainkeys if I am gonna use my ISP SMTP server for outgoing emails? This is exactly how I'm setup. I have a dynamic IP and host my mail at home. I use xpertdns.com to host my dns. My opinions on: SPF, most certainly. SRS, Don't know if it is needed. Domainkeys, Certainly for outgoing. There are some issues with incoming. SPF records alone cut way down on the backspam I was getting. I was up to about 80 bounce messages a day that had my domain as a return, but were not sent by anyone here. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] attacks?
I am flooded with these messages. does it mean my server is open for relay? should i be worried? tcpserver: ok 32516 mail.mydomain.com:192.168.1.2:25 :75.5.19.70::32413 user invalid null tcpserver: ok 32518 mail.mydomain.com:192.168.1.2:25 :75.5.19.70::32414 user invalid null user invalid null tcpserver: ok 32521 mail.mydomain.com:192.168.1.2:25 :75.5.19.70::32415 tcpserver: ok 32522 mail.mydomain.com:192.168.1.2:25 :75.5.19.70::32416 tcpserver: ok 32524 mail.mydomain.com:192.168.1.2:25 :75.5.19.70::32417 user invalid null user invalid null user invalid null tcpserver: ok 32527 mail.mydomain.com:192.168.1.2:25 :75.5.19.70::32418 user invalid null user invalid null user invalid null user invalid null user invalid null user invalid null vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70
Re: [qmailtoaster] attacks?
yah its from the same ip. i have added this ip to my blacklist. and i tested my server for open relay and it is not an open relay. thanks. On 1/13/07, South Computers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looked up the ip, ran a port scan. It appears to be the mail server for marketingmad.net, which turns out to be a site that provides services to realtors. Of course, it's a windoze box, so it could be compromised, but it looks more like a misconfiguration on their end, or a realtor trying to figure out how to use their mailing list. You could always try the normal open relay tests out there. I installed one of the scripts i found here: http://www.southcomputers.com/relaytest.php It takes a minute or two to run, so be patient with it. No idea how good or accurate it is, did not write it:-) Is it always coming from the same ip address? Maybe block them with your firweall, or iptables? slamp slamp wrote: I am flooded with these messages. does it mean my server is open for relay? should i be worried? tcpserver: ok 32516 mail.mydomain.com:192 http://mail.mydomain.com:192.168.1.2:25 :75.5.19.70::32413 user invalid null tcpserver: ok 32518 mail.mydomain.com:192 http://mail.mydomain.com:192.168.1.2:25 :75.5.19.70::32414 user invalid null user invalid null tcpserver: ok 32521 mail.mydomain.com:192 http://mail.mydomain.com:192.168.1.2:25 :75.5.19.70::32415 tcpserver: ok 32522 mail.mydomain.com:192 http://mail.mydomain.com:192.168.1.2:25 :75.5.19.70::32416 tcpserver: ok 32524 mail.mydomain.com:192 http://mail.mydomain.com:192.168.1.2:25 :75.5.19.70::32417 user invalid null user invalid null user invalid null tcpserver: ok 32527 mail.mydomain.com:192 http://mail.mydomain.com:192.168.1.2:25 :75.5.19.70::32418 user invalid null user invalid null user invalid null user invalid null user invalid null user invalid null vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 http://75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 http://75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 http://75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null: 75.5.19.70 http://75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 http://75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null: 75.5.19.70 http://75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 http://75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 http://75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 http://75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 http://75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 http://75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 http://75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null: 75.5.19.70 http://75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 http://75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null: 75.5.19.70 http://75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 http://75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 http://75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 http://75.5.19.70 vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain characters null:75.5.19.70 http://75.5.19.70 - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster
I meant safe* On 1/10/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess its same to assume that clamav 0.90rc2 is stable? On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks a bunch. Those are great enhancements! Erik Espinoza wrote: Done. On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll put the latest, 1.3.10, which will not build with srs support by default. On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Erik Espinoza wrote: Greetings, The following packages (clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster) have graduated from devel to the main site. I will be moving the new qmail-toaster and libsrs2-toaster in about a weeks time. Thanks, Erik EE, Can you put up a version of qmail-toaster on the main site that includes MSA and Alexey's patches but w/out srs? (1.3.9 or ?) -- -Eric 'shubes' -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] UPDATED PACKAGES: clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster
Since there is now a new maildrop package which i assume has the mailfilter spam support, should the qmailadmin be modified so it defaults with --define 'spambox 1'? On 1/10/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I meant safe* On 1/10/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess its same to assume that clamav 0.90rc2 is stable? On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks a bunch. Those are great enhancements! Erik Espinoza wrote: Done. On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll put the latest, 1.3.10, which will not build with srs support by default. On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Erik Espinoza wrote: Greetings, The following packages (clamav-toaster, squirrelmail-toaster, simscan-toaster, maildrop-toaster, courier-authlib-toaster, courier-imap-toaster) have graduated from devel to the main site. I will be moving the new qmail-toaster and libsrs2-toaster in about a weeks time. Thanks, Erik EE, Can you put up a version of qmail-toaster on the main site that includes MSA and Alexey's patches but w/out srs? (1.3.9 or ?) -- -Eric 'shubes' -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] DEVEL PACKAGE: squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.9a-1.3.5.src.rpm
is it just me or this rpm is borked? when i login it's stuck on webmail/src/redirect.php [client 192.168.1.50] PHP Fatal error: Call to undefined function: getpref() in /usr/share/squirrelmail/src/redirect.php on line 127, referer: https://www.MYDOMAIN.com/webmail/src/login.php using centos 4.4 On 1/8/07, CanopyAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Eric Shubes wrote: If we do an upgrade like this, do we rpm --upgrade sort of thing? Or --delete the old and --install the new? + If you hang on for a day or so, qtp-newmodel will handle upgrades from development for you. I'm doing final testing now, and the next release of qmailtoaster-plus should be available either later today or tomorrow Oh, okay ... makes me giggle! :) + - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] DEVEL PACKAGE: squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.9a-1.3.5.src.rpm
i guess it was just me. restarted apache and it worked, don't know why i needed to do that though. On 1/8/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is it just me or this rpm is borked? when i login it's stuck on webmail/src/redirect.php [client 192.168.1.50] PHP Fatal error: Call to undefined function: getpref() in /usr/share/squirrelmail/src/redirect.php on line 127, referer: https://www.MYDOMAIN.com/webmail/src/login.php using centos 4.4 On 1/8/07, CanopyAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Eric Shubes wrote: If we do an upgrade like this, do we rpm --upgrade sort of thing? Or --delete the old and --install the new? + If you hang on for a day or so, qtp-newmodel will handle upgrades from development for you. I'm doing final testing now, and the next release of qmailtoaster-plus should be available either later today or tomorrow Oh, okay ... makes me giggle! :) + - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] E-mails hung in queue
here is the maildrop log dir. see if creating the dir with the correct permission/ownership will fix your issue. # ls -ld /var/log/maildrop/ drwxr-xr-x 2 vpopmail vchkpw 4096 Oct 28 21:34 /var/log/maildrop/ # ls -l /var/log/maildrop/ total 1128 -rw--- 1 vpopmail vchkpw 1148395 Nov 25 16:33 maildrop.log On 11/25/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like your problem is that maildrop isn't able to create some log file. I haven't used maildrop, so I can't tell you exactly what this log file is, or how it's trying to be created. Could be as simple as a permission problem. Or you might be missing some log directory under /var/qmail/supervise if standard qmail logging is used. Find out how maildrop logging is supposed to work. Once it's fixed, I think your mail will flow. Sorry I couldn't be more helpful. Jack D. Martin Jr. wrote: 2006-11-25 11:50:08.560213500 delivery 1390: deferral: /usr/bin/maildrop:_Unable_to_create_log_file./ 2006-11-25 11:50:08.560312500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:51:03.552932500 starting delivery 1391: msg 2164 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-25 11:51:03.552984500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:51:03.662446500 delivery 1391: deferral: /usr/bin/maildrop:_Unable_to_create_log_file./ 2006-11-25 11:51:03.662545500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:51:06.662461500 starting delivery 1392: msg 2046 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-25 11:51:06.662601500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:51:06.770931500 delivery 1392: deferral: /usr/bin/maildrop:_Unable_to_create_log_file./ 2006-11-25 11:51:06.770965500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:51:13.770431500 starting delivery 1393: msg 2057 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-25 11:51:13.770615500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:51:13.879687500 delivery 1393: deferral: /usr/bin/maildrop:_Unable_to_create_log_file./ 2006-11-25 11:51:13.879738500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:51:15.880133500 starting delivery 1394: msg 2388 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-25 11:51:15.880299500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:51:15.989392500 delivery 1394: deferral: /usr/bin/maildrop:_Unable_to_create_log_file./ 2006-11-25 11:51:15.989453500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:51:20.989382500 starting delivery 1395: msg 2064 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-25 11:51:20.989432500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:51:21.098640500 delivery 1395: deferral: /usr/bin/maildrop:_Unable_to_create_log_file./ 2006-11-25 11:51:21.098687500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:52:10.092268500 starting delivery 1396: msg 2403 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-25 11:52:10.092440500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:52:10.203786500 delivery 1396: deferral: /usr/bin/maildrop:_Unable_to_create_log_file./ 2006-11-25 11:52:10.203819500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:52:20.202820500 starting delivery 1397: msg 2167 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-25 11:52:20.202872500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:52:20.312020500 delivery 1397: deferral: /usr/bin/maildrop:_Unable_to_create_log_file./ 2006-11-25 11:52:20.312052500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:53:10.305556500 starting delivery 1398: msg 2383 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-25 11:53:10.305617500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:53:10.414883500 delivery 1398: deferral: /usr/bin/maildrop:_Unable_to_create_log_file./ 2006-11-25 11:53:10.414916500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:53:37.411822500 starting delivery 1399: msg 2416 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-25 11:53:37.411981500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:53:37.526801500 delivery 1399: deferral: /usr/bin/maildrop:_Unable_to_create_log_file./ 2006-11-25 11:53:37.526836500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:53:48.526028500 starting delivery 1400: msg 2420 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-25 11:53:48.526172500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:53:48.526399500 starting delivery 1401: msg 1821 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-25 11:53:48.526517500 status: local 2/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:53:48.639577500 delivery 1401: deferral: /usr/bin/maildrop:_Unable_to_create_log_file./ 2006-11-25 11:53:48.639620500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:53:48.639811500 delivery 1400: deferral: /usr/bin/maildrop:_Unable_to_create_log_file./ 2006-11-25 11:53:48.639817500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:55:06.628688500 starting delivery 1402: msg 2217 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-25 11:55:06.628737500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60 2006-11-25 11:55:06.734603500 delivery 1402: deferral: /usr/bin/maildrop:_Unable_to_create_log_file./ 2006-11-25 11:55:06.734656500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60 -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 9:27 AM To:
Re: [qmailtoaster] problems with spamassassin install.
i had an issue where spam version did not update, maybe you can resolve your issue with this. stop qmail, then do a ps for any spamd/spamc/perl processes and kill them rebuild spamassassin rebuild cdb start qmail. On 11/22/06, Hainarosie Razvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did that ...still not sign of spam info in my headers # qmailctl cdb Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 23597 invoked by uid 89); 22 Nov 2006 17:28:12 - Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 23590, pid: 23592, t: 0.0464s scanners: attach: 1.2.0 clamav: 0.88.5/m:41/d:2209 Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.10.200) (127.0.0.1) by mail.wavin.ro with SMTP; 22 Nov 2006 17:28:12 - Received: from 192.168.10.100 (SquirrelMail authenticated user [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by 192.168.10.200 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:28:12 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:28:12 +0200 (EET) Subject: 2 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-1.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Thanks, Razvan - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] qtp feature suggestion
Can usendmail be included in qtp? I think this would be good for sendmail converts.http://www.ohse.de/uwe/usendmail.html
[qmailtoaster] how to manually scan messages with spamassassin?
hey list, i disabled all filters for my secondary mx (i needed to do this for my setup as my account would get disabled if i reject a spam and send it back their way) and now spams are going through without it being tagged spam and moved to spam folder. how would i manually scan e-mails and tag them as spam and move to the spam folder? i suppose this can be done in a script but i am not too familiar with spamassassin. thanks for any help.
Re: [qmailtoaster] djbdns-localcache
forgot to change gateway in the linux box. lol.On 11/9/06, tearsong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Out of newbie curiosity, what was wrong with it?~GN(aka geeknoob)On 10/29/06, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:false alarm. problem resolved. On 10/29/06, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello list, we have changed the internal ip in our network and now we cannot resolve any hosts. we are using centos 4.4 with the latest qmail and djbdns-localcache-1.05-1.0.2 . everything else is functioning but resolving hosts which is at the heart of qmailtoaster. no firewall in place. cat /etc/hosts # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost 172.16.133.4 mail.domain.com mail # cat /etc/resolv.conf search domain.com nameserver 127.0.0.1 # ifconfig -a eth0Link encap:EthernetHWaddr 00:04:5A:57:91:A9 inet addr:172.16.133.4Bcast: 172.16.133.63Mask:255.255.255.192 inet6 addr: fe80::204:5aff:fe57:91a9/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICASTMTU:1500Metric:1 RX packets:4648 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:2535 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:428892 (418.8 KiB)TX bytes:468305 (457.3 KiB) Interrupt:12 Base address:0x4000 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr: 127.0.0.1Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNINGMTU:16436Metric:1 RX packets:220 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:220 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:26777 (26.1 KiB)TX bytes:26777 (26.1 KiB)- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] ASSP
Can this be implemented in a toaster setup?http://howtoforge.com/antispam_smtp_proxyTell assp to listen to 123.123.123.123:25 and forward to localhost:25. Network Setup SMTP Destination 127.0.0.1:25 The internal Postfix V As a Daemon Check the box Listen Port 123.123.123.123:25 The spam proxy Web Admin Port A non default numberRelaying Local Domains* example.com|anotherexample.comSecurity Web Admin Password newpasword Now we tell postfix to only accept connections from our proxy. Edit /etc/postfix/master.cf Change : smtp inet n - n - - smtpd to: localhost:smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
Re: [qmailtoaster] How to discard spamassasin bounces
hmm actually if spam hits is over 12 points it generates a bounce. bounce message: rejected by: bounced (host domain.com[69.115.xx.xxx] said: 554 Your email is considered spam (17.50 spam-hits) (in reply to end of DATA command)) smtp log: 2006-10-24 16:56:47.566033500 tcpserver: status: 0/100 2006-10-24 17:12:53.798053500 tcpserver: status: 1/100 2006-10-24 17:12:53.798058500 tcpserver: pid 1871 from 208.11.75.2 2006-10-24 17:12:53.798061500 tcpserver: ok 1871 mail.domain.com:192.168.2.50:25 :208.11.75.2::35258 2006-10-24 17:12:56.898361500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mail.r ollernet.us:unknown:208.11.75.2 rcpt : sender accepted 2006-10-24 17:12:57.194445500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mail.rol lernet.us:unknown:208.11.75.2 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2006-10-24 17:12:57.696231500 simscan:[1871]:SPAM REJECT (17.50/12.00):0.4995s:***SPAM*** Faith Matt ers - Meet Catholic singles:208.11.75.2:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-24 17:12:57.702238500 tcpserver: end 1871 status 0 spamd log: 2006-10-24 16:56:47.535371500 [25696] info: prefork: child states: II 2006-10-24 17:12:57.351048500 [1378] info: spamd: connection from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1] at port 35386 2006-10-24 17:12:57.356215500 [1378] info: spamd: processing message [EMAIL PROTECTED] .rollernet.us for clamav:89 2006-10-24 17:12:57.692273500 [1378] info: spamd: identified spam (17.5/5.0) for clamav:89 in 0.3 se conds, 1860 bytes. 2006-10-24 17:12:57.692647500 [1378] info: spamd: result: Y 17 - HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08,HTML_MESSAGE,HTM L_SHORT_LINK_IMG_1,MEET_SINGLES,MIME_HTML_ONLY,URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SC _SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL scantime=0.3,size=1860,user=clamav,uid=89,required_score=5.0,rhost=localhost.l ocaldomain,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=35386,mid=[EMAIL PROTECTED],autolearn=no i actually want to prevent this also but i don't know where to go. On 11/7/06, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you. You cleared it up for me. -Original Message- From: David Sánchez Martín [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:25 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] How to discard spamassasin bounces Returned by spamassassin??? Ok, let's figure it out the problem: The problem is one spammer sends you a forged From mail. 1.- If the mail From is not valid, is rejected by chkuser, no bounces 2.- If the mail Recipient is not a valid user on your mailserver is rejected by chkuser, so no bounces 3.- If spamassassin says has 12 (by default) hit points your smtp rejects it, so it doesn't generate bounces. 4.- If spamassassin says is below 12 is delivered to the mailbox. If it's correctly delivered no bounces are generated. AFAIK Only if is the case 4 could generate bounces just for 4 causes: 1.- Incorrect configured account (for example, alias to non existent accounts) 2.- Mailbox full or something like this 3.- Redirects to another server that bounces the mail. 4.- You have a relay user that is a spammer In which category your problem falls? *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* | David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrador de Sistemas| http://www.e2000.es E2000 Nuevas Tecnologias | | E2000 Organizacion de Empresarios|Tel : +34 902 19 61 77 Mediadores de Seguros | | Agustin Bravo Esquina Calle C| 33120 Pravia Asturias Spain | | *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* -Mensaje original- De: Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: martes, 07 de noviembre de 2006 18:47 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Asunto: RE: [qmailtoaster] How to discard spamassasin bounces Thank you. I already have that set and that only deletes the incoming wrong user mail, not the email sent out as bounces. -Original Message- From: abdul khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 9:35 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] How to discard spamassasin bounces set up account to catchall deleted It is under qmailadmin. Alex wrote: Can someone help me figure out how to not send the bounce messages back to the sender which are being returned by spamassasin? I am having issues with my server bombarding unsuspecting people whose email was hijacked with spam bounces. Thanks - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] How to discard spamassasin bounces
Following up on this. Can this be enabled by Drop Message option (http://qmailwiki.inter7.com/Simscan/Guide#Drop_Message_option) Some sites have security policies in place which require them to accept every email. For these sites there is an option to do all the normal simscan processing, but if a virus or spam is detected the message is not handed to qmail-queue for local delivery. Instead it is silently dropped. Use this option when configuring simscan --enable-dropmsg I was looking at the spec file for simscan and it is not enabled. There is also a settings: drop message = OFF Would this be what I need to drop messages with spam hits over 12??? On 11/7/06, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hmm actually if spam hits is over 12 points it generates a bounce. bounce message: rejected by: bounced (host domain.com[69.115.xx.xxx] said: 554 Your email is considered spam (17.50 spam-hits) (in reply to end of DATA command)) smtp log: 2006-10-24 16:56:47.566033500 tcpserver: status: 0/100 2006-10-24 17:12:53.798053500 tcpserver: status: 1/100 2006-10-24 17:12:53.798058500 tcpserver: pid 1871 from 208.11.75.2 2006-10-24 17:12:53.798061500 tcpserver: ok 1871 mail.domain.com:192.168.2.50:25 :208.11.75.2::35258 2006-10-24 17:12:56.898361500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mail.r ollernet.us:unknown:208.11.75.2 rcpt : sender accepted 2006-10-24 17:12:57.194445500 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote mail.rol lernet.us:unknown:208.11.75.2 rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient 2006-10-24 17:12:57.696231500 simscan:[1871]:SPAM REJECT (17.50/12.00):0.4995s:***SPAM*** Faith Matt ers - Meet Catholic singles:208.11.75.2:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-24 17:12:57.702238500 tcpserver: end 1871 status 0 spamd log: 2006-10-24 16:56:47.535371500 [25696] info: prefork: child states: II 2006-10-24 17:12:57.351048500 [1378] info: spamd: connection from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1] at port 35386 2006-10-24 17:12:57.356215500 [1378] info: spamd: processing message [EMAIL PROTECTED] .rollernet.us for clamav:89 2006-10-24 17:12:57.692273500 [1378] info: spamd: identified spam (17.5/5.0) for clamav:89 in 0.3 se conds, 1860 bytes. 2006-10-24 17:12:57.692647500 [1378] info: spamd: result: Y 17 - HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08,HTML_MESSAGE,HTM L_SHORT_LINK_IMG_1,MEET_SINGLES,MIME_HTML_ONLY,URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SC _SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL scantime=0.3,size=1860,user=clamav,uid=89,required_score=5.0,rhost=localhost.l ocaldomain,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=35386,mid=[EMAIL PROTECTED],autolearn=no i actually want to prevent this also but i don't know where to go. On 11/7/06, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you. You cleared it up for me. -Original Message- From: David Sánchez Martín [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:25 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] How to discard spamassasin bounces Returned by spamassassin??? Ok, let's figure it out the problem: The problem is one spammer sends you a forged From mail. 1.- If the mail From is not valid, is rejected by chkuser, no bounces 2.- If the mail Recipient is not a valid user on your mailserver is rejected by chkuser, so no bounces 3.- If spamassassin says has 12 (by default) hit points your smtp rejects it, so it doesn't generate bounces. 4.- If spamassassin says is below 12 is delivered to the mailbox. If it's correctly delivered no bounces are generated. AFAIK Only if is the case 4 could generate bounces just for 4 causes: 1.- Incorrect configured account (for example, alias to non existent accounts) 2.- Mailbox full or something like this 3.- Redirects to another server that bounces the mail. 4.- You have a relay user that is a spammer In which category your problem falls? *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* | David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrador de Sistemas| http://www.e2000.es E2000 Nuevas Tecnologias | | E2000 Organizacion de Empresarios|Tel : +34 902 19 61 77 Mediadores de Seguros | | Agustin Bravo Esquina Calle C| 33120 Pravia Asturias Spain | | *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* -Mensaje original- De: Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: martes, 07 de noviembre de 2006 18:47 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Asunto: RE: [qmailtoaster] How to discard spamassasin bounces Thank you. I already have that set and that only deletes the incoming wrong user mail, not the email sent out as bounces. -Original Message- From: abdul khan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 07
