Re: [qmailtoaster] Testing and development repos
Sounds great I was planning on that but have not time at the moment. > Il giorno 14 lug 2019, alle ore 08:22, Angus McIntyre ha > scritto: > > Thank you, Eric. > > And thank you also (again) for all your hard work in maintaining the > qmailtoaster site and the associated software. > > I'm in the process of developing an ansible role for setting up a > qmailtoaster installation, as another option for people who want to install > QMT. I'm fairly far along in the process, and it's given me a new > appreciation of how much work you've put into making everything fit together. > > The role isn't quite ready for prime time yet, but when I'm satisfied that it > does everything it should, I'll announce it here and invite comments and code > reviews. > > Thanks, > > Angus > > > > > Eric Broch wrote on 7/12/19 9:05 AM: >> Angus, >> Yes, that is correct with respect to versioning. >> I believe you get the lastest 1.03-3.1 with update from development. >> I've been using this version since creation date and have found no ill >> effects. There have been MANY downloads of this from the repos I control, >> and I can't be sure what people are using it for, hopefully production use. >> There are several other people I know of using the latest version >> successfully. >> If there are others please pipe in and let us know your experience. >> I wouldn't hesitate to install it in a production environment. >> Eric >>> On 7/11/2019 6:23 PM, Angus McIntyre wrote: >>> This is probably a question for Eric B. >>> >>> On the 'qmailtoaster.com' homepage, under CentOS 7 QMT Host, section 3, it >>> offers three apparent alternatives -- a straight yum update, followed by >>> yum update with 'qmt-testing' enabled, and yum update with 'qmt-devel' >>> enabled. There are then four qmail versions described, one current, and >>> three development. >>> >>> My reading of this is that you get to pick one of these options, and if you >>> choose the basic yum update, you get the qmail-1.03-2.1 install, if you use >>> 'qmt-testing' you get qmail-1.03-2.1 but with updated versions of the >>> supporting software, and if you choose 'qmt-devel', you get one of the >>> versions listed as 'development repo'. >>> >>> Is this more or less correct? >>> >>> Which development version do you get if you choose 'qmt-devel'? >>> >>> The qmail-1.03-3.1 repo is shown as having been installed at the end of >>> September last year; has it proven stable enough that you'd recommend >>> installing it in production? >>> >>> Thanks in advance for any advice, >>> >>> Angus >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com >>> For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com >>> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com >> For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com > For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Testing and development repos
Thank you, Eric. And thank you also (again) for all your hard work in maintaining the qmailtoaster site and the associated software. I'm in the process of developing an ansible role for setting up a qmailtoaster installation, as another option for people who want to install QMT. I'm fairly far along in the process, and it's given me a new appreciation of how much work you've put into making everything fit together. The role isn't quite ready for prime time yet, but when I'm satisfied that it does everything it should, I'll announce it here and invite comments and code reviews. Thanks, Angus Eric Broch wrote on 7/12/19 9:05 AM: Angus, Yes, that is correct with respect to versioning. I believe you get the lastest 1.03-3.1 with update from development. I've been using this version since creation date and have found no ill effects. There have been MANY downloads of this from the repos I control, and I can't be sure what people are using it for, hopefully production use. There are several other people I know of using the latest version successfully. If there are others please pipe in and let us know your experience. I wouldn't hesitate to install it in a production environment. Eric On 7/11/2019 6:23 PM, Angus McIntyre wrote: This is probably a question for Eric B. On the 'qmailtoaster.com' homepage, under CentOS 7 QMT Host, section 3, it offers three apparent alternatives -- a straight yum update, followed by yum update with 'qmt-testing' enabled, and yum update with 'qmt-devel' enabled. There are then four qmail versions described, one current, and three development. My reading of this is that you get to pick one of these options, and if you choose the basic yum update, you get the qmail-1.03-2.1 install, if you use 'qmt-testing' you get qmail-1.03-2.1 but with updated versions of the supporting software, and if you choose 'qmt-devel', you get one of the versions listed as 'development repo'. Is this more or less correct? Which development version do you get if you choose 'qmt-devel'? The qmail-1.03-3.1 repo is shown as having been installed at the end of September last year; has it proven stable enough that you'd recommend installing it in production? Thanks in advance for any advice, Angus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
Re: [qmailtoaster] Testing and development repos
Angus, Yes, that is correct with respect to versioning. I believe you get the lastest 1.03-3.1 with update from development. I've been using this version since creation date and have found no ill effects. There have been MANY downloads of this from the repos I control, and I can't be sure what people are using it for, hopefully production use. There are several other people I know of using the latest version successfully. If there are others please pipe in and let us know your experience. I wouldn't hesitate to install it in a production environment. Eric On 7/11/2019 6:23 PM, Angus McIntyre wrote: This is probably a question for Eric B. On the 'qmailtoaster.com' homepage, under CentOS 7 QMT Host, section 3, it offers three apparent alternatives -- a straight yum update, followed by yum update with 'qmt-testing' enabled, and yum update with 'qmt-devel' enabled. There are then four qmail versions described, one current, and three development. My reading of this is that you get to pick one of these options, and if you choose the basic yum update, you get the qmail-1.03-2.1 install, if you use 'qmt-testing' you get qmail-1.03-2.1 but with updated versions of the supporting software, and if you choose 'qmt-devel', you get one of the versions listed as 'development repo'. Is this more or less correct? Which development version do you get if you choose 'qmt-devel'? The qmail-1.03-3.1 repo is shown as having been installed at the end of September last year; has it proven stable enough that you'd recommend installing it in production? Thanks in advance for any advice, Angus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
