Sounds great I was planning on that but have not time at the moment.
> Il giorno 14 lug 2019, alle ore 08:22, Angus McIntyre <[email protected]> ha > scritto: > > Thank you, Eric. > > And thank you also (again) for all your hard work in maintaining the > qmailtoaster site and the associated software. > > I'm in the process of developing an ansible role for setting up a > qmailtoaster installation, as another option for people who want to install > QMT. I'm fairly far along in the process, and it's given me a new > appreciation of how much work you've put into making everything fit together. > > The role isn't quite ready for prime time yet, but when I'm satisfied that it > does everything it should, I'll announce it here and invite comments and code > reviews. > > Thanks, > > Angus > > > > > Eric Broch wrote on 7/12/19 9:05 AM: >> Angus, >> Yes, that is correct with respect to versioning. >> I believe you get the lastest 1.03-3.1 with update from development. >> I've been using this version since creation date and have found no ill >> effects. There have been MANY downloads of this from the repos I control, >> and I can't be sure what people are using it for, hopefully production use. >> There are several other people I know of using the latest version >> successfully. >> If there are others please pipe in and let us know your experience. >> I wouldn't hesitate to install it in a production environment. >> Eric >>> On 7/11/2019 6:23 PM, Angus McIntyre wrote: >>> This is probably a question for Eric B. >>> >>> On the 'qmailtoaster.com' homepage, under CentOS 7 QMT Host, section 3, it >>> offers three apparent alternatives -- a straight yum update, followed by >>> yum update with 'qmt-testing' enabled, and yum update with 'qmt-devel' >>> enabled. There are then four qmail versions described, one current, and >>> three development. >>> >>> My reading of this is that you get to pick one of these options, and if you >>> choose the basic yum update, you get the qmail-1.03-2.1 install, if you use >>> 'qmt-testing' you get qmail-1.03-2.1 but with updated versions of the >>> supporting software, and if you choose 'qmt-devel', you get one of the >>> versions listed as 'development repo'. >>> >>> Is this more or less correct? >>> >>> Which development version do you get if you choose 'qmt-devel'? >>> >>> The qmail-1.03-3.1 repo is shown as having been installed at the end of >>> September last year; has it proven stable enough that you'd recommend >>> installing it in production? >>> >>> Thanks in advance for any advice, >>> >>> Angus >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
