[Rd] R: prcomp documentation (PR#7372)
Hello help(prcomp) documentation doesn't say that dimensionality of the data treated is number of columns of the matrix. I suggest this to be added somewhere near the description of the matrix argument 'x'. Cl __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] R: prcomp documentation (PR#7372)
I have no idea what you mean by this. prcomp works on a matrix, which has two dimensions, and what you mean by `dimensionality of the data' in PCA depends on whether you are doing R mode or Q mode PCA. Have you read the references on the help page? On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: help(prcomp) documentation doesn't say that dimensionality of the data treated is number of columns of the matrix. I suggest this to be added somewhere near the description of the matrix argument 'x'. -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UKFax: +44 1865 272595 __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] bug in methods' 'initialize' (or the functions called in turn) ?
Laurent Gautier wrote: Hi, I experience a very strange behaviour when trying to instanciate a S4 class. A call like 'r - new(MyClass, foo=bar)' returns apparently cleanly, but in fact a subsequent use of 'r' results in a 'r does not exist error message'. After a bit of hunting with 'debug', it seems that the bug is in 'initialize' (or one of the functions it calls in turn). All this while using R-devel from Nov. 16th (R-2.0.1-devel). I did manage to make a simple example to reproduce the bug, but to do so one needs few packages from the bioconductor project. If this is not yet know and one shows interest, I can provide the few lines of code needed to reproduce it. Two points: a) yes, please alsways specify a simple reproducible example when talking about a bug; b) if this bug does not appear in R-2.0.1 but only in the current R-devel, it might be worth to wait a couple of days. Perhaps someone is including some new functionality and has not yet finished the updates. Uwe Ligges L. __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] R/S-related projects on Sourceforge? Trove Categorization
Hi R-Users and Developers, Several months ago I made a request on Sourceforge to add the R/S - programming language to the _Trove_ categorization. (The Trove is a means to convey basic metainformation about your project.) Today I got the following response of one of the sourceforge admins. SNIP SourceForge.net will consider the inclusion of a programming language within the Trove system when we host at least 5 projects based on that language. Please advise: Do you know of 5 projects hosted on SourceForge.net based on this language? SNIP If anyone of you knew about R-packages, or projects using the R/S programming language, which are hosted on sourceforge, please reply to this thread. I hope that your answers will enable me to give more then 5 examples of R projects hosted on Sourceforge. Yours Eryk Ps. The ID of my original feature request on Sourceforge is 967697. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=350001aid=967697group_id=1 -- Dipl. bio-chem. Witold Eryk Wolski MPI-Moleculare Genetic Ihnestrasse 63-73 14195 Berlin tel: 0049-30-83875219 __(_ http://www.molgen.mpg.de/~wolski \__/'v' http://r4proteomics.sourceforge.net||/ \ mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]^^ m m [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] Re: [R] R/S-related projects on Sourceforge? Trove Categorization
Hi, I have 2 _small_ projects hosted in sf.net that use R FLR :: R for fisheries science (http://flr.sf.net) fsap: fish stock assessment for R (http://sf.net/projects/fsap) The first one is getting some hip and the second is dying ... Hope it helps. Regards EJ On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 09:09, Witold Eryk Wolski wrote: Hi R-Users and Developers, Several months ago I made a request on Sourceforge to add the R/S - programming language to the _Trove_ categorization. (The Trove is a means to convey basic metainformation about your project.) Today I got the following response of one of the sourceforge admins. SNIP SourceForge.net will consider the inclusion of a programming language within the Trove system when we host at least 5 projects based on that language. Please advise: Do you know of 5 projects hosted on SourceForge.net based on this language? SNIP If anyone of you knew about R-packages, or projects using the R/S programming language, which are hosted on sourceforge, please reply to this thread. I hope that your answers will enable me to give more then 5 examples of R projects hosted on Sourceforge. Yours Eryk Ps. The ID of my original feature request on Sourceforge is 967697. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=350001aid=967697group_id=1 __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] Re: R/S-related projects on Sourceforge? Trove Categorization
Witold Eryk Wolski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : Hi R-Users and Developers, : : Several months ago I made a request on Sourceforge to add the R/S - : programming language to the _Trove_ categorization. (The Trove is a : means to convey basic metainformation about your project.) It might be worthwhile to consider all the possible sourceforge-like sites in case there is a particular advantage of one over the others. For example, it might be better to choose one with svn support than one that only has cvs support. Sites include sourceforge, savannah, berlios, seul and a few others, some of which are listed at http://www.ibiblio.org/fosphost/exhost.htm . Also some languages have started their own sourceforge-style project repositories such as luaforge.net and rubyforge.org and one could conceivably have an Rforge too. I don't know enough about the above sites to say much more but I think the key requirements are to provide support to addon packages and projects to encourage the current explosion of such software. The idea would be to automate the setup of an infrastructure that includes such things as: - X-help and X-devel email distribution lists for project X - access to svn so developers can coordinate their efforts on a project - wiki, forums, other groupware - web space for a home page - ftp space for archiving old versions and distributing beta versions - slick package development tools to make it easier to develop packages - ensure that there are a really good set of base classes in the core for projects to leverage off of __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] Building Packages on Windows using .Rbuildignore
I have some questions about building packages in Windows when using .Rbuildignore . The part of the process that is of interest here is the part that creates the source tree from the tree that contains the .Rbuildignore file. That is, the part of the process that does a build of the original tree creating a .tar.gz and then extracts this file into a source directory that can be used by check, build --binary and install. 1. makefiles I was developing some batch files for myself using R CMD ... but then noticed the Windows makefiles. - Do the makefiles take into account the situation above? - If so, do I need to do anything special to use them this way? 2. configure.win Also I noticed reference to configure.win in the Extensions manual and am not sure if that can be used to address this. I tried creating a one line configure.win which just does an echo of a fixed string echo XYZ but I did not see XYZ during my R CMD install. - Is configure.win supposed to be written using Windows batch commands or UNIX-like commands? - where does it go. (I tried putting it in the same directory as my DESCRIPTION file.) - is it a suitable device for handling the .Rbuildignore issue? Thanks. __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] Wishlist: pos argument for mget (PR#7376)
Full_Name: Hsiu-Khuern Tang Version: 2.0.0 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Submission from: (NULL) (156.153.255.243) Why doesn't mget() have a pos argument like get()? mget has an envir argument, but the documentation says that this is only for backward compatibility. Thanks, Hsiu-Khuern. __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] Building Packages on Windows using .Rbuildignore
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:10:20 + (UTC), Gabor Grothendieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : I have some questions about building packages in Windows when using .Rbuildignore . The part of the process that is of interest here is the part that creates the source tree from the tree that contains the .Rbuildignore file. That is, the part of the process that does a build of the original tree creating a .tar.gz and then extracts this file into a source directory that can be used by check, build --binary and install. 1. makefiles I was developing some batch files for myself using R CMD ... but then noticed the Windows makefiles. - Do the makefiles take into account the situation above? - If so, do I need to do anything special to use them this way? I don't think I understand exactly what you're asking. 2. configure.win Also I noticed reference to configure.win in the Extensions manual and am not sure if that can be used to address this. I tried creating a one line configure.win which just does an echo of a fixed string echo XYZ but I did not see XYZ during my R CMD install. - Is configure.win supposed to be written using Windows batch commands or UNIX-like commands? It is run under sh, not the standard Windows interpreter, so UNIX-like. I just tried it with Rcmd install, and I did see the message echoed. I didn't see it for Rcmd build, because that doesn't build the package, it just puts it in a tarball, but Rcmd build --binary does run it. - where does it go. (I tried putting it in the same directory as my DESCRIPTION file.) It should be in the same directory as DESCRIPTION. - is it a suitable device for handling the .Rbuildignore issue? What's the issue exactly? Duncan Murdoch __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] Building Packages on Windows using .Rbuildignore
Duncan Murdoch murdoch at stats.uwo.ca writes: : : On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:10:20 + (UTC), Gabor Grothendieck : ggrothendieck at myway.com wrote : : : : I have some questions about building packages in Windows : when using .Rbuildignore . The part of the process that : is of interest here is the part that creates the source : tree from the tree that contains the .Rbuildignore file. : That is, the part of the process that does a build of : the original tree creating a .tar.gz and then extracts : this file into a source directory that can be used by : check, build --binary and install. : : 1. makefiles : : I was developing some batch files for myself using R CMD ... : but then noticed the Windows makefiles. : : - Do the makefiles take into account the situation above? : : - If so, do I need to do anything special to use them this way? : : I don't think I understand exactly what you're asking. If one does not use .Rbuildignore then with a pure R package one can run off the original source files, in this case in /wherever/mypkg, like this: ...without .Rbuildignore ... R CMD install /wherever/mypkg R CMD check /wherever/mypkg R CMD build /wherever/mypkg R CMD build /wherever/mypkg --binary but if one DOES use .Rbuildignore then one must first build the package to remove the .Rbuildignore cited files and then run off the built files which were created by unpacking the tar.gz file. Below we build the files in /wherever/mypkg and put the resulting .tar.gz in the current diretory and then unpack it and run the remaining commands off the unpacked directory (unlike the previous case where we ran everything off the original directory, viz. /wherever/mypkg): ... with .Rbuildignore ... R CMD build /wherever/mypkg tar xvzf mypkg_0.9-1.tar.gz ... now that we have created a new source directory, mypkg, without ... the .Rbuildignore files we can proceed by running off of that. ... Note that mypkg is different than /wherever/mypkg as the former ... does not contain the ignored files. R CMD install mypkg R CMD check mypkg R CMD build mypkg --binary I was writing a batch file to handle this second case for me but was wondering if I was just duplicating work that has already been done or can easily be done with existing makefiles or somehow using configure.win. : : 2. configure.win : : Also I noticed reference to configure.win in the Extensions : manual and am not sure if that can be used to address this. : I tried creating a one line configure.win which just does : an echo of a fixed string echo XYZ but I did not see XYZ : during my R CMD install. : : - Is configure.win supposed to be written using Windows batch commands : or UNIX-like commands? : : It is run under sh, not the standard Windows interpreter, so : UNIX-like. : : I just tried it with Rcmd install, and I did see the message echoed. : I didn't see it for Rcmd build, because that doesn't build the : package, it just puts it in a tarball, but Rcmd build --binary does : run it. : : : - where does it go. (I tried putting it in the same directory as : my DESCRIPTION file.) : : It should be in the same directory as DESCRIPTION. : : - is it a suitable device for handling the .Rbuildignore issue? : : What's the issue exactly? : : Duncan Murd __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] Building Packages on Windows using .Rbuildignore
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:44:48 + (UTC), Gabor Grothendieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : If one does not use .Rbuildignore then with a pure R package one can run off the original source files, in this case in /wherever/mypkg, like this: ...without .Rbuildignore ... R CMD install /wherever/mypkg R CMD check /wherever/mypkg R CMD build /wherever/mypkg R CMD build /wherever/mypkg --binary but if one DOES use .Rbuildignore then one must first build the package to remove the .Rbuildignore cited files and then run off the built files which were created by unpacking the tar.gz file. ... or what happens? I still don't know exactly what you are claiming goes wrong. It might be that the behaviour should be changed, or maybe there's an existing workaround, but I'd like to see a clear statement of the problem first. Duncan Murdoch __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] Re: [R-gui] Re: [R] The hidden costs of GPL software?
I've moved this response to r-devel, as I think it's more appropriate there than in r-help or R-sig-GUI. On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:55:11 -0500, Mike Prager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : This has been an interesting discussion. I make the following comment with hesitation, since I have neither the time nor the ability to implement it myself. Using CLI software, an infrequent user has trouble remembering the known functions needed and trouble finding new ones (especially as that user gets older). What might help is an added help facility more oriented towards tasks, rather than structured around functions or packages. Such a help facility might have a tree structure. Want help? Are you looking for information on (1) data manipulation or (2) analysis? If (1), do you want to to (3) import or export data, (4) transform data, (5) reshape data, or (6) select data? If (2), do you want to (7) fit a model or (8) make a graph? And so on A difficulty is the moving target problem. A lot of the value of R lies in the contributed packages. A fixed help system wouldn't know about new features of packages. Currently we have the so-called keyword categorization of help pages; those come somewhat close to what you're asking for. To see them, run help.start() to open up the HTML help, and click on Search Engine and Keywords. One problem is that this requires both Java and Javascript to work properly in your browser; I think it's pretty common that one or the other is uncooperative. (For example, I can't get Java to work in Firefox or IE.) Another problem with this scheme is that the keyword list is fixed and limited, and may not match the user's (or package writer's) expectations. There are also ways to add searchable words to the help topics (using the \concept markup), but those are new and not widely used. A full text search might be nice, but it would be slow without some work in advance. Duncan Murdoch __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] Re: [R] changing (core) function argument defaults?
gt;From: Patrick Connolly lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; gt;To: quot;RenE J.V. Bertinquot; lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; gt;Subject: Re: [R] changing (core) function argument defaults? gt;Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:43:10 +1300 gt; gt;On Wed, 20-Oct-2004 at 07:48PM +0200, RenE J.V. Bertin wrote: gt; gt;|gt; Hello, gt;|gt; gt; gt;|gt; Is it possible to change the defaults for the arguments to a gt;|gt; function, without changing the function code itself? I'm asking gt;|gt; because I'd like to override the default dimensions and font family gt;|gt; for a graphics device. Before 2.0.0, I'd just do that with a small gt;|gt; edit in the appropriate .R file containing the device function gt;|gt; definition. I appears to be possible no longer. So rather than gt;|gt; copying the definition into my own .Rprofile, it would be nice if gt;|gt; just the defaults could be modified... gt; gt;I didn't notice a response to this question. I'd like to do something gt;similar and haven't been able to work out how to do it. gt; gt; gt;best gt; gt;-- gt;Patrick Connolly gt;HortResearch gt;Mt Albert gt;Auckland gt;New Zealand gt;Ph: +64-9 815 4200 x 7188 No, I haven't noticed a reply to this question neither. Best, René Bertin __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] Re: [R] changing (core) function argument defaults?
Restricted to r-devel (it is almost never appropriate to send the same
message to both lists).
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, RenE J.V. Bertin wrote:
gt;From: Patrick Connolly lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;
gt;To: quot;RenE J.V. Bertinquot; lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;
gt;Subject: Re: [R] changing (core) function argument defaults?
gt;Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:43:10 +1300
gt;
gt;On Wed, 20-Oct-2004 at 07:48PM +0200, RenE J.V. Bertin wrote:
gt;
gt;|gt; Hello,
gt;|gt;
gt;
gt;|gt; Is it possible to change the defaults for the arguments to a
gt;|gt; function, without changing the function code itself? I'm asking
gt;|gt; because I'd like to override the default dimensions and font family
gt;|gt; for a graphics device. Before 2.0.0, I'd just do that with a small
gt;|gt; edit in the appropriate .R file containing the device function
gt;|gt; definition. I appears to be possible no longer. So rather than
gt;|gt; copying the definition into my own .Rprofile, it would be nice if
gt;|gt; just the defaults could be modified...
gt;
gt;I didn't notice a response to this question. I'd like to do something
gt;similar and haven't been able to work out how to do it.
You can write a wrapper
X11-function(display=,width=2,height=2,...){
grDevices::X11(display,width,height,...)
}
and put that into your Rprofile.
-thomas
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] Building Packages on Windows using .Rbuildignore
Duncan Murdoch murdoch at stats.uwo.ca writes: On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:44:48 + (UTC), Gabor Grothendieck ggrothendieck at myway.com wrote : If one does not use .Rbuildignore then with a pure R package one can run off the original source files, in this case in /wherever/mypkg, like this: ...without .Rbuildignore ... R CMD install /wherever/mypkg R CMD check /wherever/mypkg R CMD build /wherever/mypkg R CMD build /wherever/mypkg --binary but if one DOES use .Rbuildignore then one must first build the package to remove the .Rbuildignore cited files and then run off the built files which were created by unpacking the tar.gz file. ... or what happens? I still don't know exactly what you are claiming goes wrong. QUESTION I am not claiming anything is wrong. I was simply describing what processing is needed to build a package that only uses R, noting that such processing is different if one uses .Rbuildignore. My question was to ask: - are there already scripts, makefiles or some other software or hooks such as configure.win to streamline this EXAMPLE For example, in http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/help/04/11/6729.html John Fox provided a batch file that automated package creation in the case that there is only R code and one does not use .Rbuildignore. I do use .Rbuildignore and need to do the analogous. Most of my past two posts described the manual commands that must be done in each of these two cases to make clear what the process that I want to streamline is and how it differs in these two cases. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN USING .RBUILDIGNORE AND NOT The reason that the processing is different according to whether one uses .Rbuildignore or not is that R CMD build takes the .Rbuildignore file into account but R CMD install R CMD check R CMD build --binary do not take .Rbuildignore into account. It might be that the behaviour should be changed, or maybe there's an existing workaround, but I'd like to see a clear statement of the problem first. Certainly its desirable to streamline this whole situation with a makefile, script or hook or perhaps one could modify the individual commands: R CMD install, R CMD check and R CMD build --binary to take .Rbuildignore into account, possibly via a switch/flag. However, all I was asking about is what is already there. Thanks. __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] Re: [R] changing (core) function argument defaults?
gt;Restricted to r-devel (it is almost never appropriate to send the
gt;same message to both lists).
Fine with me!
gt;X11lt;-function(display=quot;quot;,width=2,height=2,...){
gt;grDevices::X11(display,width,height,...)
gt;}
gt;
gt;and put that into your Rprofile.
Great, thanks! Is there documentation from which to find out what to put in
that wrapper function, for an arbitrary function?
René Bertin
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] Re: [R] changing (core) function argument defaults?
Just to add to Thomas Lumley suggestion: it's generally a good idea to call
a wrapper function it by a different name. This way, when you forget that
you have a wrapper function, you won't be puzzled by why the function
doesn't behave according to the documentation, and you won't embarrass
yourself by asking other people why there is a bug in R. Also, if the
function is called programmatically by other functions, those usages might
be depending upon the standard defaults being in effect. So, just do
something like:
myX11-function(display=,width=2,height=2,...){
grDevices::X11(display=display,width=width,height=height,...)
}
-- Tony Plate
At Wednesday 05:18 PM 11/17/2004, Thomas Lumley wrote:
Restricted to r-devel (it is almost never appropriate to send the same
message to both lists).
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, RenE J.V. Bertin wrote:
From: Patrick Connolly lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: quot;RenE J.V. Bertinquot; lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [R] changing (core) function argument defaults?
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:43:10 +1300
On Wed, 20-Oct-2004 at 07:48PM +0200, RenE J.V. Bertin wrote:
| Hello,
|
| Is it possible to change the defaults for the arguments to a
| function, without changing the function code itself? I'm asking
| because I'd like to override the default dimensions and font family
| for a graphics device. Before 2.0.0, I'd just do that with a small
| edit in the appropriate .R file containing the device function
| definition. I appears to be possible no longer. So rather than
| copying the definition into my own .Rprofile, it would be nice if
| just the defaults could be modified...
I didn't notice a response to this question. I'd like to do something
similar and haven't been able to work out how to do it.
You can write a wrapper
X11-function(display=,width=2,height=2,...){
grDevices::X11(display,width,height,...)
}
and put that into your Rprofile.
-thomas
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] Re: [R] Changing graphics defaults [was: changing (core) function argument defaults?]
Under the S3 standard, you could make a local copy of any function and change the defaults in that local copy. That may not always work under the S4 standard methods dispatch going to code hidden in namespaces. In any event, it should be easy (and safer) to write a function with a slightly different name, e.g., adding a dot . to the end of the name, that would have different defaults and would do nothing but call the function of interest. This might be safer I don't have any suggestions about changing graphics defaults other than to ask for that specifically -- e.g., by changing the subject line to this email. hope this helps. spencer graves RenE J.V. Bertin wrote: gt;From: Patrick Connolly lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; gt;To: quot;RenE J.V. Bertinquot; lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; gt;Subject: Re: [R] changing (core) function argument defaults? gt;Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:43:10 +1300 gt; gt;On Wed, 20-Oct-2004 at 07:48PM +0200, RenE J.V. Bertin wrote: gt; gt;|gt; Hello, gt;|gt; gt; gt;|gt; Is it possible to change the defaults for the arguments to a gt;|gt; function, without changing the function code itself? I'm asking gt;|gt; because I'd like to override the default dimensions and font family gt;|gt; for a graphics device. Before 2.0.0, I'd just do that with a small gt;|gt; edit in the appropriate .R file containing the device function gt;|gt; definition. I appears to be possible no longer. So rather than gt;|gt; copying the definition into my own .Rprofile, it would be nice if gt;|gt; just the defaults could be modified... gt; gt;I didn't notice a response to this question. I'd like to do something gt;similar and haven't been able to work out how to do it. gt; gt; gt;best gt; gt;-- gt;Patrick Connolly gt;HortResearch gt;Mt Albert gt;Auckland gt;New Zealand gt;Ph: +64-9 815 4200 x 7188 No, I haven't noticed a reply to this question neither. Best, René Bertin __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html -- Spencer Graves, PhD, Senior Development Engineer O: (408)938-4420; mobile: (408)655-4567 __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] R will not start - missing library? (PR#7377)
Full_Name: Adam Hausknecht Version: 2.0.1 OS: Mac OS 10.3.6 Submission from: (NULL) (129.44.182.8) The following message was reported in the console: dyld: /Applications/StartR.app/RAqua.app/Contents/MacOS/RAqua can't open library: /usr/local/lib/libreadline.4.3.dylib (No such file or directory, errno = 2) 1. I have tried reinstalling R 2.0.1 several times but this does not fix the problem. I also used the disk utility to repair permissions but this did not solve the problem. 2. Also, R 2.0.1 did RUN just after I first intalled it. However, it would not run the next time I attempted to lauch it (and the message above was written to the console). Adam Hausknecht __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
