Re: [Rd] Building R for windows tools link
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Gorjanc Gregor wrote:
Hello!
I think that link to page of Duncan Murdoch (bellow) should be given
http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/
at
http://developer.r-project.org/.
Are you saying that it is given incorrectly? I can't see it.
That site is for the development of R, not for users building R, so it
does not seem appropriate to link from there.
No, it isn't given incorrectly. I was surprised that it isn't there. I
agree to some point with you, but building R is probably also part of the
development.
It's easy to launch Google and find mentioned page, but it took me quite
some time to do this, because I was sure, that it is noted somewhere
on {www,CRAN}.r-project.org. Maybe I didn't read carefully ...
It _is_ in the R-admin manual, the place building R for Windows is
discussed (as from 2.1.0). Apart from in that manual I am unaware of it
being on the main R web sites.
OK, it looks like I'll have to update a bookmark in my head.
--
Lep pozdrav / With regards,
Gregor Gorjanc
--
University of Ljubljana
Biotechnical FacultyURI: http://www.bfro.uni-lj.si/MR/ggorjan
Zootechnical Department mail: gregor.gorjanc at bfro.uni-lj.si
Groblje 3 tel: +386 (0)1 72 17 861
SI-1230 Domzale fax: +386 (0)1 72 17 888
Slovenia, Europe
--
One must learn by doing the thing; for though you think you know it,
you have no certainty until you try. Sophocles ~ 450 B.C.
__
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] Patch to address (PR#7853) -- tested briefly, seems to
Thank you for the patch.
To clarify: this is not a bug. ?.C says
The mapping of the types of R arguments to C or Fortran arguments
in '.C' or '.Fortran' is
R C Fortran
integerint * integer
numericdouble *double precision
- or - float * real
complexRcomplex * double complex
logicalint * integer
character char ** [see below]
list SEXP * not allowed
other SEXPnot allowed
and `raw' is in the `other' category. So this would be a change in
behaviour and needs some changes to the documentation. We will do that
for 2.2.0.
Two hints (more for R-devel than just you).
1) Please provide a patch against the current sources, not 2.0.0. (it
worked, with a bit of fiddling).
2) Please _attach_ patches, as your mailer wrapped this one.
On Thu, 12 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- dotcode.c2004-09-05 02:31:57.0 -0700
+++ /usr/local/src/R-2.0.0/src/main/dotcode.c2005-05-11
12:24:11.0 -0700
@@ -190,6 +190,7 @@
static void *RObjToCPtr(SEXP s, int naok, int dup, int narg, int Fort,
const char *name, R_toCConverter **converter,
int targetType)
{
+unsigned char *rawptr;
int *iptr;
float *sptr;
double *rptr;
@@ -228,6 +229,16 @@
}
switch(TYPEOF(s)) {
+case RAWSXP:
+n = LENGTH(s);
+rawptr = RAW(s);
+if (dup) {
+rawptr = (unsigned char *) R_alloc(n, sizeof(unsigned char));
+for (i = 0; i n; i++)
+rawptr[i] = RAW(s)[i];
+}
+return (void *) rawptr;
+break;
case LGLSXP:
case INTSXP:
n = LENGTH(s);
@@ -329,6 +340,7 @@
static SEXP CPtrToRObj(void *p, SEXP arg, int Fort,
R_NativePrimitiveArgType type)
{
+unsigned char *rawptr;
int *iptr, n=length(arg);
float *sptr;
double *rptr;
@@ -339,6 +351,12 @@
SEXP s, t;
switch(type) {
+case RAWSXP:
+s = allocVector(type, n);
+rawptr = (unsigned char *)p;
+for (i = 0; i n; i++)
+RAW(s)[i] = rawptr[i];
+break;
case LGLSXP:
case INTSXP:
s = allocVector(type, n);
__
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
--
Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UKFax: +44 1865 272595
__
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] Building R for windows tools link
On Thu, 12 May 2005, Gregor GORJANC wrote: Prof Brian Ripley wrote: On Wed, 11 May 2005, Gorjanc Gregor wrote: Hello! I think that link to page of Duncan Murdoch (bellow) should be given http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/ at http://developer.r-project.org/. Are you saying that it is given incorrectly? I can't see it. That site is for the development of R, not for users building R, so it does not seem appropriate to link from there. No, it isn't given incorrectly. I was surprised that it isn't there. I agree to some point with you, but building R is probably also part of the development. As the front page says `This site is intended as an intermediate repository for more or less finalized ideas and plans for the R statistical system.' What exactly is unclear about that? How to build current R is not part of the development of R. -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UKFax: +44 1865 272595 __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] Windows freezes plotting large line plots (PR#7856)
Full_Name: Timo Becker Version: 2.1.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (193.170.87.36) Hi! The following command causes Windows XP to freeze so that I can only pull the plug: plot(seq(1, 44100), rnorm(44100), type=l) This does not happen with plot(seq(1, 44100), rnorm(44100)) and plot(seq(1,100), rnorm(100), type=l) platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw32 system i386, mingw32 status major2 minor1.0 year 2005 month04 day 18 language R __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] Building R for windows tools link
Prof Brian Ripley wrote: On Thu, 12 May 2005, Gregor GORJANC wrote: Prof Brian Ripley wrote: On Wed, 11 May 2005, Gorjanc Gregor wrote: Hello! I think that link to page of Duncan Murdoch (bellow) should be given http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/ at http://developer.r-project.org/. Are you saying that it is given incorrectly? I can't see it. That site is for the development of R, not for users building R, so it does not seem appropriate to link from there. No, it isn't given incorrectly. I was surprised that it isn't there. I agree to some point with you, but building R is probably also part of the development. As the front page says `This site is intended as an intermediate repository for more or less finalized ideas and plans for the R statistical system.' What exactly is unclear about that? How to build current R is not part of the development of R. Nothing is unclear. I still think that building is part of the development. I'm sure that R-devils, uups I meant R-devels, don't want to develop something that is not buildable. Anyway, lets end with this disscussion. I will remember that mentioned link is in R-admin manual. -- Lep pozdrav / With regards, Gregor Gorjanc -- University of Ljubljana Biotechnical FacultyURI: http://www.bfro.uni-lj.si/MR/ggorjan Zootechnical Department mail: gregor.gorjanc at bfro.uni-lj.si Groblje 3 tel: +386 (0)1 72 17 861 SI-1230 Domzale fax: +386 (0)1 72 17 888 Slovenia, Europe -- One must learn by doing the thing; for though you think you know it, you have no certainty until you try. Sophocles ~ 450 B.C. __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] Building R for windows tools link
Gregor GORJANC [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As the front page says `This site is intended as an intermediate repository for more or less finalized ideas and plans for the R statistical system.' What exactly is unclear about that? How to build current R is not part of the development of R. Nothing is unclear. I still think that building is part of the development. I'm sure that R-devils, uups I meant R-devels, don't want to develop something that is not buildable. Anyway, lets end with this disscussion. I will remember that mentioned link is in R-admin manual. Just to be clear: The point is that the developer site was never intended as being complete and polished, and nobody wants to commit to making it so. It was set up for things like preliminary white papers which were too large to handle as part of regular email traffic within R Core, plus some items that we kept needing to remind ourselves (and some others) about. It is open to the public, but it is not a service. -- O__ Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3 c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX: (+45) 35327907 __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
RE: [Rd] bug in modulus operator %% (PR#7852)
I've now found a Windows system that does this. This is also Windows XP, fully patched, and with the same rw2010. So it may be chip-specific: the one that works is a P4 and the one that does not is a latest Pentium M. I am not sure that the guarantee on the help page has been supported for a while. I've altered the code so it is more likely to be. BTW, options(digits=20) 1 %% 0.001 [1] 0.0009792 shows why the original is not a bug in R. On Thu, 12 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 11 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, you are correct. I had only checked one of my platforms. Linux works as you suggest. But for me on Windows, x - 1 y - 0.2 x %/% y [1] 5 ## I get a 4 in Linux I get 5 on Windows, but (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y) [1] 1 so is there a problem particular to your Windows runtime? version _ =20 platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 =20 os mingw32 =20 system i386, mingw32 =20 status =20 major2 =20 minor1.0 =20 year 2005 =20 month04=20 day 18=20 language R =20 -Original Message- From: Peter Dalgaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 4:14 PM To: McGehee, Robert Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Peter Dalgaard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: Re: [Rd] bug in modulus operator %% (PR#7852) McGehee, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, but from ?%%: It is guaranteed that 'x =3D=3D (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y)' (up to = rounding error) ... =20 (R 2.1.0) x - 1 y - 0.2 x %% y [1] 0.2 (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y) [1] 1.2 =20 Certainly 1 does not equal 1.2 as the documentation would suggest, and these seem like large enough numbers to not be effected by rounding errors or lack of precision. Now that looks a bit odd, but it isn't universal: x - 1 y - 0.2 x %% y [1] 0.2 x %/% y [1] 4 (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y) [1] 1 So what platform was that happening on? -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UKFax: +44 1865 272595 __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] bug, feature of mistery?
Giuseppe Ragusa wrote:
Uwe,
- Where is *lexical* scoping involved?
Abuse of notation. I intended to say scoping.
- Are you really calling you code from a clean workspace?
Yes it is clean.
- Why don't use pass g through optim() to f? Please do so, because it
might be a scoping problem.
Tried that. Still no luck. z- does not get assigned even if i pass g
through optim
- The .C call in psi() should not matter unless you are doing strange
things in the part you omitted (...).
I do not think is the call to C. And I did not omit, psi() is the last
call. And again, same code works fine on the other machine.
Can you send me a reproducible example (off list), please (inlcuding
example data)?
Uwe
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Giuseppe Ragusa wrote:
I have two machines a linux_amd64_x86 (gentoo_amd64) and a linux_x86. Both
run
R-2.1.0. I have a very long program (hopefully will become a package)
that works perfectly on the linux_amd_x64. Great means no error, no
problems and results that, where the analytic solution exists,
coincide with it. I have problem making the code run on the x64 machine. I
am baffled. The same code on the same version of R, different arch,
is behaving differently.
After hour of debugging, I traced down what is triggering the error on
the x86 machine.
the code snippet is the following similar to:
R
g - h(d)
f - function( lambda )
{
z - g %*% lambda
sum( psi(z) )
...
}
optim( init.value, f )
R
The function f() is using lexical scoping to get obtain g. The
function psi() is a call to a wrapper function that call a (.C) C
function doing some simple calculation on z.
- Where is *lexical* scoping involved?
- Are you really calling you code from a clean workspace?
- Why don't use pass g through optim() to f? Please do so, because it
might be a scoping problem.
- The .C call in psi() should not matter unless you are doing strange
things in the part you omitted (...).
Uwe Ligges
What's the problem? When f() is called, g is there, lambda is there,
but the assignment z - g %*% lambda results in a matrix of NaN. This
happens from the second time f() is called, i.e. the first time f() is
called from optim() after the C call has been made. The error is then
that passing a NaN vector to .C results in halted execution.
If I debug f() during the call to optim, I can without problem assign
z the correct value, but during the execution z is matrix(NaN, nr,
1).
At this point I can think of the following:
1) the external C code has errors
It is not a programming error, because when called from console it
returns the right results. Also, remember, the program work on my
other machine (the 64 bit);
2) R error (I do not think so)
3) Compiling error
Can be the gcc is messing thing around?
on the 32bit machine
gcc version 3.3.5 (Gentoo Linux 3.3.5-r1, ssp-3.3.2-3, pie-8.7.7.1)
on the 64-bit machine
gcc version 3.4.3 20041125 (Gentoo Linux 3.4.3-r1, ssp-3.4.3-0, pie-8.7.7)
Any help, suggestions, thoughts?
Thank you.
Giuseppe Ragusa
__
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
__
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
__
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] Windows freezes plotting large line plots (PR#7856)
On 12-May-05 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is already addressed in R-patched: we do ask you to check before filing a bug report so as not to waste our time. (It was also discussed on R-help: see the archives.) It is a bug *in Windows* and not one in R: nothing an application can do should be that fatal (and this is a perfectly legitimate Windows GDI call). I trust that you will file a bug report in the correct place. From the CHANGES file: The support for mitred lines encountered a Windows problem with a dramatic slowdown if more than 1000 or so segments were plotted in a polyline. We now plot in bunches of 1000, which is less accurate but works around the Windows problem. Clearly a neccessary change, even though it is less accurate. But does this change apply only to Windows compilations (i.e. conditional compilation), or will we all have to put up with it? Ted. E-Mail: (Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861 Date: 12-May-05 Time: 08:26:43 -- XFMail -- __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] Windows freezes plotting large line plots (PR#7856)
On Thu, 12 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12-May-05 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is already addressed in R-patched: we do ask you to check before filing a bug report so as not to waste our time. (It was also discussed on R-help: see the archives.) It is a bug *in Windows* and not one in R: nothing an application can do should be that fatal (and this is a perfectly legitimate Windows GDI call). I trust that you will file a bug report in the correct place. From the CHANGES file: The support for mitred lines encountered a Windows problem with a dramatic slowdown if more than 1000 or so segments were plotted in a polyline. We now plot in bunches of 1000, which is less accurate but works around the Windows problem. Clearly a neccessary change, even though it is less accurate. But does this change apply only to Windows compilations (i.e. conditional compilation), or will we all have to put up with it? It applies only to the windows() device (including win.metafile etc). -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UKFax: +44 1865 272595 __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
RE: [Rd] bug in modulus operator %% (PR#7852)
Could very easily be chipset, but I'm actually running a Pentium 4 myself. Pentium 4 1.9GHz, on a Windows XP Professional Version 2002 Service Professional, Service Pack 1. Also of interest, 1 %% 0.2 [1] 0.2 1 %% 0.25 [1] 0 -Original Message- From: Prof Brian Ripley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 3:39 AM To: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: RE: [Rd] bug in modulus operator %% (PR#7852) I've now found a Windows system that does this. This is also Windows XP, fully patched, and with the same rw2010. So it may be chip-specific: the one that works is a P4 and the one that does not is a latest Pentium M. I am not sure that the guarantee on the help page has been supported for a while. I've altered the code so it is more likely to be. BTW, options(digits=20) 1 %% 0.001 [1] 0.0009792 shows why the original is not a bug in R. On Thu, 12 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 11 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, you are correct. I had only checked one of my platforms. Linux works as you suggest. But for me on Windows, x - 1 y - 0.2 x %/% y [1] 5 ## I get a 4 in Linux I get 5 on Windows, but (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y) [1] 1 so is there a problem particular to your Windows runtime? version _ =20 platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 =20 os mingw32 =20 system i386, mingw32 =20 status =20 major2 =20 minor1.0 =20 year 2005 =20 month04=20 day 18=20 language R =20 -Original Message- From: Peter Dalgaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 4:14 PM To: McGehee, Robert Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Peter Dalgaard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: Re: [Rd] bug in modulus operator %% (PR#7852) McGehee, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, but from ?%%: It is guaranteed that 'x =3D=3D (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y)' (up to = rounding error) ... =20 (R 2.1.0) x - 1 y - 0.2 x %% y [1] 0.2 (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y) [1] 1.2 =20 Certainly 1 does not equal 1.2 as the documentation would suggest, and these seem like large enough numbers to not be effected by rounding errors or lack of precision. Now that looks a bit odd, but it isn't universal: x - 1 y - 0.2 x %% y [1] 0.2 x %/% y [1] 4 (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y) [1] 1 So what platform was that happening on? -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UKFax: +44 1865 272595 __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] bug in modulus operator %% (PR#7852)
Prof Brian Ripley wrote: I've now found a Windows system that does this. This is also Windows XP, fully patched, and with the same rw2010. So it may be chip-specific: the one that works is a P4 and the one that does not is a latest Pentium M. I am not sure that the guarantee on the help page has been supported for a while. I've altered the code so it is more likely to be. BTW, options(digits=20) 1 %% 0.001 [1] 0.0009792 shows why the original is not a bug in R. Why is that not a bug in R? On my machine (windows XP, rw2010 from CRAN) I get: test - function(x, y) (x %% y) + y * ( x %/% y ) # should be x test(1, 0.001) [1] 1.001 test(1, 0.1) [1] 1.1 test(1, 1) [1] 1 test(1, 0.01) [1] 1.01 and this differences (well, not the third one) cannot be said to be rounding error. Kjetil On Thu, 12 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 11 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, you are correct. I had only checked one of my platforms. Linux works as you suggest. But for me on Windows, x - 1 y - 0.2 x %/% y [1] 5 ## I get a 4 in Linux I get 5 on Windows, but (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y) [1] 1 so is there a problem particular to your Windows runtime? version _ =20 platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 =20 os mingw32 =20 system i386, mingw32 =20 status =20 major2 =20 minor1.0 =20 year 2005 =20 month04=20 day 18=20 language R =20 -Original Message- From: Peter Dalgaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 4:14 PM To: McGehee, Robert Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Peter Dalgaard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: Re: [Rd] bug in modulus operator %% (PR#7852) McGehee, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, but from ?%%: It is guaranteed that 'x =3D=3D (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y)' (up to = rounding error) ... =20 (R 2.1.0) x - 1 y - 0.2 x %% y [1] 0.2 (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y) [1] 1.2 =20 Certainly 1 does not equal 1.2 as the documentation would suggest, and these seem like large enough numbers to not be effected by rounding errors or lack of precision. Now that looks a bit odd, but it isn't universal: x - 1 y - 0.2 x %% y [1] 0.2 x %/% y [1] 4 (x %% y) + y * (x %/% y) [1] 1 So what platform was that happening on? -- Kjetil Halvorsen. Peace is the most effective weapon of mass construction. -- Mahdi Elmandjra -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] segfault on large number of open brackets (PR#7859)
Full_Name: Max Version: R 2.0.1 (2004-11-15) OS: Gentoo Linux Submission from: (NULL) (158.143.49.181) I leaned on the ( key by accident, and it looks as if R segfaults on a large number (88 or more in my case) open brackets: Script started on Thu May 12 15:18:04 2005 $ R R : Copyright 2004, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version 2.0.1 (2004-11-15), ISBN 3-900051-07-0 R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'license()' or 'licence()' for distribution details. R is a collaborative project with many contributors. Type 'contributors()' for more information and 'citation()' on how to cite R or R packages in publications. Type 'demo()' for some demos, 'help()' for on-line help, or 'help.start()' for a HTML browser interface to help. Type 'q()' to quit R. (( ( + ( Segmentation fault $ uname -a Linux max 2.6.11-gentoo-r6 #2 Sat May 7 19:24:52 GMT 2005 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux $ exit Script done on Thu May 12 15:18:16 2005 Regards, Max R compiled with gcc 3.3.5 glibc-2.3.4 __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] bug in modulus operator %% (PR#7852)
On Thu, 12 May 2005, Kjetil Brinchmann Halvorsen wrote: Prof Brian Ripley wrote: I've now found a Windows system that does this. This is also Windows XP, fully patched, and with the same rw2010. So it may be chip-specific: the one that works is a P4 and the one that does not is a latest Pentium M. I am not sure that the guarantee on the help page has been supported for a while. I've altered the code so it is more likely to be. BTW, options(digits=20) 1 %% 0.001 [1] 0.0009792 shows why the original is not a bug in R. Why is that not a bug in R? On my machine (windows XP, rw2010 from CRAN) I Because 0 = y %% x y, so that adding any multiple of 0.001 takes it out of range. get: test - function(x, y) (x %% y) + y * ( x %/% y ) # should be x test(1, 0.001) [1] 1.001 test(1, 0.1) [1] 1.1 test(1, 1) [1] 1 test(1, 0.01) [1] 1.01 and this differences (well, not the third one) cannot be said to be rounding error. I think they can. The problem is that x %/% y is affected by rounding error in the representation of 0.01, as in 1 %/% 0.01 [1] 99 on my machine. That is due to rounding error. -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UKFax: +44 1865 272595 __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
RE: [Rd] segfault on large number of open brackets (PR#7859)
I believe that's been fixed in R-2.1.0. Please check. I got the same segfault with R-2.0.1 on SuSE Linux x86_64, but on both that machine and my WinXP latop, I get syntax error. E.g., R : Copyright 2005, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version 2.1.0 Patched (2005-05-12), ISBN 3-900051-07-0 R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'license()' or 'licence()' for distribution details. Natural language support but running in an English locale R is a collaborative project with many contributors. Type 'contributors()' for more information and 'citation()' on how to cite R or R packages in publications. Type 'demo()' for some demos, 'help()' for on-line help, or 'help.start()' for a HTML browser interface to help. Type 'q()' to quit R. ((( + ((( Error: syntax error Andy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Full_Name: Max Version: R 2.0.1 (2004-11-15) OS: Gentoo Linux Submission from: (NULL) (158.143.49.181) I leaned on the ( key by accident, and it looks as if R segfaults on a large number (88 or more in my case) open brackets: Script started on Thu May 12 15:18:04 2005 $ R R : Copyright 2004, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version 2.0.1 (2004-11-15), ISBN 3-900051-07-0 R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'license()' or 'licence()' for distribution details. R is a collaborative project with many contributors. Type 'contributors()' for more information and 'citation()' on how to cite R or R packages in publications. Type 'demo()' for some demos, 'help()' for on-line help, or 'help.start()' for a HTML browser interface to help. Type 'q()' to quit R. (( ( + ( Segmentation fault $ uname -a Linux max 2.6.11-gentoo-r6 #2 Sat May 7 19:24:52 GMT 2005 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux $ exit Script done on Thu May 12 15:18:16 2005 Regards, Max R compiled with gcc 3.3.5 glibc-2.3.4 __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
RE: [Rd] segfault on large number of open brackets (PR#7859)
I believe that's been fixed in R-2.1.0. Please check. I got the same segfault with R-2.0.1 on SuSE Linux x86_64, but on both that machine and my WinXP latop, I get syntax error. E.g., R : Copyright 2005, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version 2.1.0 Patched (2005-05-12), ISBN 3-900051-07-0 R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'license()' or 'licence()' for distribution details. Natural language support but running in an English locale R is a collaborative project with many contributors. Type 'contributors()' for more information and 'citation()' on how to cite R or R packages in publications. Type 'demo()' for some demos, 'help()' for on-line help, or 'help.start()' for a HTML browser interface to help. Type 'q()' to quit R. ((( + ((( Error: syntax error Andy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Full_Name: Max Version: R 2.0.1 (2004-11-15) OS: Gentoo Linux Submission from: (NULL) (158.143.49.181) I leaned on the ( key by accident, and it looks as if R segfaults on a large number (88 or more in my case) open brackets: Script started on Thu May 12 15:18:04 2005 $ R R : Copyright 2004, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version 2.0.1 (2004-11-15), ISBN 3-900051-07-0 R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'license()' or 'licence()' for distribution details. R is a collaborative project with many contributors. Type 'contributors()' for more information and 'citation()' on how to cite R or R packages in publications. Type 'demo()' for some demos, 'help()' for on-line help, or 'help.start()' for a HTML browser interface to help. Type 'q()' to quit R. (( ( + ( Segmentation fault $ uname -a Linux max 2.6.11-gentoo-r6 #2 Sat May 7 19:24:52 GMT 2005 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux $ exit Script done on Thu May 12 15:18:16 2005 Regards, Max R compiled with gcc 3.3.5 glibc-2.3.4 __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] segfault on large number of open brackets (PR#7859)
Liaw, Andy wrote: I believe that's been fixed in R-2.1.0. Please check. I got the same segfault with R-2.0.1 on SuSE Linux x86_64, but on both that machine and my WinXP latop, I get syntax error. E.g., R : Copyright 2005, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version 2.1.0 Patched (2005-05-12), ISBN 3-900051-07-0 R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'license()' or 'licence()' for distribution details. Natural language support but running in an English locale R is a collaborative project with many contributors. Type 'contributors()' for more information and 'citation()' on how to cite R or R packages in publications. Type 'demo()' for some demos, 'help()' for on-line help, or 'help.start()' for a HTML browser interface to help. Type 'q()' to quit R. ((( + ((( Error: syntax error With R-2.1.0 (release!) I get syntax error on Windows, no error (at least not after the first couple of hundred openings) on Linux, but the described *segfault* on Solaris 5.7 (UltraSparc). [I am too lazy to try out R-patched on the slowish Solaris machine yet] Uwe Ligges Andy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Full_Name: Max Version: R 2.0.1 (2004-11-15) OS: Gentoo Linux Submission from: (NULL) (158.143.49.181) I leaned on the ( key by accident, and it looks as if R segfaults on a large number (88 or more in my case) open brackets: Script started on Thu May 12 15:18:04 2005 $ R R : Copyright 2004, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version 2.0.1 (2004-11-15), ISBN 3-900051-07-0 R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'license()' or 'licence()' for distribution details. R is a collaborative project with many contributors. Type 'contributors()' for more information and 'citation()' on how to cite R or R packages in publications. Type 'demo()' for some demos, 'help()' for on-line help, or 'help.start()' for a HTML browser interface to help. Type 'q()' to quit R. (( ( + ( Segmentation fault $ uname -a Linux max 2.6.11-gentoo-r6 #2 Sat May 7 19:24:52 GMT 2005 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux $ exit Script done on Thu May 12 15:18:16 2005 Regards, Max R compiled with gcc 3.3.5 glibc-2.3.4 __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] segfault on large number of open brackets (PR#7859)
Yes, it is coincidence. I have found the error and have a fix: more detailed message to follow. Brian On Thu, 12 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Liaw, Andy wrote: I believe that's been fixed in R-2.1.0. Please check. I got the same segfault with R-2.0.1 on SuSE Linux x86_64, but on both that machine and my WinXP latop, I get syntax error. E.g., R : Copyright 2005, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version 2.1.0 Patched (2005-05-12), ISBN 3-900051-07-0 R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'license()' or 'licence()' for distribution details. Natural language support but running in an English locale R is a collaborative project with many contributors. Type 'contributors()' for more information and 'citation()' on how to cite R or R packages in publications. Type 'demo()' for some demos, 'help()' for on-line help, or 'help.start()' for a HTML browser interface to help. Type 'q()' to quit R. ((( + ((( Error: syntax error With R-2.1.0 (release!) I get syntax error on Windows, no error (at least not after the first couple of hundred openings) on Linux, but the described *segfault* on Solaris 5.7 (UltraSparc). [I am too lazy to try out R-patched on the slowish Solaris machine yet] Uwe Ligges Andy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Full_Name: Max Version: R 2.0.1 (2004-11-15) OS: Gentoo Linux Submission from: (NULL) (158.143.49.181) I leaned on the ( key by accident, and it looks as if R segfaults on a large number (88 or more in my case) open brackets: Script started on Thu May 12 15:18:04 2005 $ R R : Copyright 2004, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version 2.0.1 (2004-11-15), ISBN 3-900051-07-0 R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'license()' or 'licence()' for distribution details. R is a collaborative project with many contributors. Type 'contributors()' for more information and 'citation()' on how to cite R or R packages in publications. Type 'demo()' for some demos, 'help()' for on-line help, or 'help.start()' for a HTML browser interface to help. Type 'q()' to quit R. (( ( + ( Segmentation fault $ uname -a Linux max 2.6.11-gentoo-r6 #2 Sat May 7 19:24:52 GMT 2005 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux $ exit Script done on Thu May 12 15:18:16 2005 Regards, Max R compiled with gcc 3.3.5 glibc-2.3.4 __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UKFax: +44 1865 272595 __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
RE: [Rd] segfault on large number of open brackets (PR#7859)
I suspect that is coincidence, as I can see no source change that would
account for it.
2.0.1 and R-devel work for me and 2.1.0 segfaults with
999 KeepSource = *LOGICAL(GetOption(install(keep.source),
R_NilValue));
(gdb) bt
#0 0x080ca229 in ParseInit () at gram.y:999
#1 0x080cb305 in token () at gram.y:1530
I am not sure that is right, but I am pretty sure that
static char contextstack[50], *contextp;
just above is an unchecked nesting limit, as in
static void IfPush(void)
{
if (*contextp==LBRACE ||
*contextp=='['||
*contextp=='('||
*contextp == 'i')
*++contextp = 'i';
}
However, although I thought this was the problem, it seems only to apply
to nested if()s. So I do not currently have a solution.
On Thu, 12 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that's been fixed in R-2.1.0. Please check.
I got the same segfault with R-2.0.1 on SuSE Linux x86_64, but on both that
machine and my WinXP latop, I get syntax error. E.g.,
R : Copyright 2005, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Version 2.1.0 Patched (2005-05-12), ISBN 3-900051-07-0
R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions.
Type 'license()' or 'licence()' for distribution details.
Natural language support but running in an English locale
R is a collaborative project with many contributors.
Type 'contributors()' for more information and
'citation()' on how to cite R or R packages in publications.
Type 'demo()' for some demos, 'help()' for on-line help, or
'help.start()' for a HTML browser interface to help.
Type 'q()' to quit R.
(((
+ (((
Error: syntax error
Andy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Full_Name: Max
Version: R 2.0.1 (2004-11-15)
OS: Gentoo Linux
Submission from: (NULL) (158.143.49.181)
I leaned on the ( key by accident, and it looks as if R
segfaults on a large
number (88 or more in my case) open brackets:
Script started on Thu May 12 15:18:04 2005
$ R
R : Copyright 2004, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Version 2.0.1 (2004-11-15), ISBN 3-900051-07-0
R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions.
Type 'license()' or 'licence()' for distribution details.
R is a collaborative project with many contributors.
Type 'contributors()' for more information and
'citation()' on how to cite R or R packages in publications.
Type 'demo()' for some demos, 'help()' for on-line help, or
'help.start()' for a HTML browser interface to help.
Type 'q()' to quit R.
((
(
+ (
Segmentation fault
$ uname -a
Linux max 2.6.11-gentoo-r6 #2 Sat May 7 19:24:52 GMT 2005
i686 Intel(R)
Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
$ exit
Script done on Thu May 12 15:18:16 2005
Regards,
Max
R compiled with
gcc 3.3.5
glibc-2.3.4
__
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
__
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
--
Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UKFax: +44 1865 272595
__
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] Implementing R on IBM p690 cluster Jump
As far as I know R 2.0.1 was built on AIX. A quick diff gannet% diff ~/R/R-2.0.1/src/modules/X11/Makefile ~/R/R-2.1.0/src/modules/X11/Makefile 54c54 $(SHLIB_LINK) -o $@ $(R_X11_la_LDFLAGS) $(R_X11_la_OBJECTS) $(R_X11_la_LIBADD) $(LIBS) --- $(SHLIB_LINK) -o $@ $(R_X11_la_LDFLAGS) $(R_X11_la_OBJECTS) $(R_X11_la_LIBADD) 128c128,129 ../../../src/include/Rmodules/RX11.h --- ../../../src/include/Rmodules/RX11.h \ ../../../src/include/Rconnections.h suggests that AIX (alone) required $(LIBS) there. As it is harmful on some other platforms (the intention is to pick up entry points in R.bin/libR rather than duplicate copies of static libraries) I suspect we need an AIX-specific workaround (in particular the libintl library is not going to be in LIBS). This probably applies to other modules and even shared objects in packages. Is there anyone with an AIX machine who is able to work through this and provide appropriate diffs? On Thu, 12 May 2005, Bill Northcott wrote: On 11/05/2005, at 11:26 PM, Kurt Hornik wrote: There seem to be problems in the autoconf stuff. cos and sin are being located in libm but the link line you show has no '-lm' which accounts for 6 of the 7 missing symbols. Also gettext seems to have been located by the configure script, but there is no option on the link line to include it in the link. Also search configure.in for strings like powerpc-ibm-aix to see what stuff is being done specifically for AIX. It may be out of date in relation to your system. If it was my problem, I would have look at those bits of the configure script and the sections of configure.in that generated them. Then I would compare the AC_SUBST variables with the makefile.in that generated the link. It seems there is some non- communication there. Yes most of the undefined symbols seem to come from libm. But they would also be in libm on all other platforms which have such, and we do not include it there. On Linux I get gcc-3.4 -shared -L/usr/local/lib -o R_X11.so dataentry.lo devX11.lo rotated.lo rbitmap.lo -lSM -lICE -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 -ljpeg -lpng -lz -L../../../lib -lR What happens on Linux is just not really relevant to what happens on AIX, although it might explain why the errors have not been picked up. A number of platforms do not have a separate libm. Instead they have a symlink to some general C library. So typically libm is linked by default on these platforms. It looks as if that is not the case on AIX, and that a specific -lm flag is needed. and this works. As Brian already wrote, we are building a *module* here, so I assume that we are not getting the flags for building modules right. Assuming that libtool can, it might be helpful to look at the output of BUILDDIR/libtool --config. The error messages are about missing symbols. Bill __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UKFax: +44 1865 272595 __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] Implementing R on IBM p690 cluster Jump
Brian D Ripley writes: As far as I know R 2.0.1 was built on AIX. A quick diff gannet% diff ~/R/R-2.0.1/src/modules/X11/Makefile ~/R/R-2.1.0/src/modules/X11/Makefile 54c54 $(SHLIB_LINK) -o $@ $(R_X11_la_LDFLAGS) $(R_X11_la_OBJECTS) $(R_X11_la_LIBADD) $(LIBS) --- $(SHLIB_LINK) -o $@ $(R_X11_la_LDFLAGS) $(R_X11_la_OBJECTS) $(R_X11_la_LIBADD) 128c128,129 ../../../src/include/Rmodules/RX11.h --- ../../../src/include/Rmodules/RX11.h \ ../../../src/include/Rconnections.h suggests that AIX (alone) required $(LIBS) there. As it is harmful on some other platforms (the intention is to pick up entry points in R.bin/libR rather than duplicate copies of static libraries) I suspect we need an AIX-specific workaround (in particular the libintl library is not going to be in LIBS). This probably applies to other modules and even shared objects in packages. Yes. It would still be good if someone on AIX could provide us with the output of BUILDDIR/libtool --config. -k Is there anyone with an AIX machine who is able to work through this and provide appropriate diffs? On Thu, 12 May 2005, Bill Northcott wrote: On 11/05/2005, at 11:26 PM, Kurt Hornik wrote: There seem to be problems in the autoconf stuff. cos and sin are being located in libm but the link line you show has no '-lm' which accounts for 6 of the 7 missing symbols. Also gettext seems to have been located by the configure script, but there is no option on the link line to include it in the link. Also search configure.in for strings like powerpc-ibm-aix to see what stuff is being done specifically for AIX. It may be out of date in relation to your system. If it was my problem, I would have look at those bits of the configure script and the sections of configure.in that generated them. Then I would compare the AC_SUBST variables with the makefile.in that generated the link. It seems there is some non- communication there. Yes most of the undefined symbols seem to come from libm. But they would also be in libm on all other platforms which have such, and we do not include it there. On Linux I get gcc-3.4 -shared -L/usr/local/lib -o R_X11.so dataentry.lo devX11.lo rotated.lo rbitmap.lo -lSM -lICE -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 -ljpeg -lpng -lz -L../../../lib -lR What happens on Linux is just not really relevant to what happens on AIX, although it might explain why the errors have not been picked up. A number of platforms do not have a separate libm. Instead they have a symlink to some general C library. So typically libm is linked by default on these platforms. It looks as if that is not the case on AIX, and that a specific -lm flag is needed. and this works. As Brian already wrote, we are building a *module* here, so I assume that we are not getting the flags for building modules right. Assuming that libtool can, it might be helpful to look at the output of BUILDDIR/libtool --config. The error messages are about missing symbols. Bill __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UKFax: +44 1865 272595 __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
RE: [Rd] segfault on large number of open brackets (PR#7859)
On Thu, 12 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that is coincidence, as I can see no source change that would
account for it.
2.0.1 and R-devel work for me and 2.1.0 segfaults with
999 KeepSource = *LOGICAL(GetOption(install(keep.source),
R_NilValue));
(gdb) bt
#0 0x080ca229 in ParseInit () at gram.y:999
#1 0x080cb305 in token () at gram.y:1530
I am not sure that is right, but I am pretty sure that
static char contextstack[50], *contextp;
just above is an unchecked nesting limit, as in
static void IfPush(void)
{
if (*contextp==LBRACE ||
*contextp=='['||
*contextp=='('||
*contextp == 'i')
*++contextp = 'i';
}
However, although I thought this was the problem, it seems only to apply
to nested if()s. So I do not currently have a solution.
I was almost right, just a different instance of *++contextp.
Fixed in R-patched, to give
(((
Error: contextstack overflow
--
Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UKFax: +44 1865 272595
__
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] Bug in axis labels (PR#7860)
Bob O'hara wrote: I'm a bit reluctant to call anything a bug: I know it's usually my incompetence instead. In this case, I can't see what else it is, although it may be a bug in Windows. The problem comes from trying to create a .png of a figure in Windows XP, with R2.1.0. On the screen it looks OK, but in the .png the text for the x label is smaller than for the y label. The problem seems to be created by using axes=F in plot(). Here's some code to demonstrate the problem: XX=1:5; YY=1:5 png(thing.png) par(mfrow=c(2,1)) plot(XX, YY, axes=F, xlab=X label, ylab=Y label) plot(XX, YY, xlab=X label, ylab=Y label) dev.off() I get a similar problem with bmp() and jpeg(), but not postscript() or pdf(). If I draw the figure in the window in R and then save it as a .png from the menu, the png looks fine. Everything works fine in R1.5.1 (I know, I know!) on Debian Linux, which is why I'm reporting this as a Windows problem. I see the problem in the first figure, and it's still there in a recent r-devel build. My test was also on Windows. Since png() uses the Windows graphics driver, it does look like an R bug in the Windows graphics driver, but I'd like to hear from someone on a different platform... Duncan Murdoch __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] Bug in axis labels (PR#7860)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Everything works fine in R1.5.1 (I know, I know!) on Debian Linux, which is why I'm reporting this as a Windows problem. I see the problem in the first figure, and it's still there in a recent r-devel build. My test was also on Windows. Since png() uses the Windows graphics driver, it does look like an R bug in the Windows graphics driver, but I'd like to hear from someone on a different platform... I don't see it with 2.1.0 on Linux (FC3). -- O__ Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3 c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX: (+45) 35327907 __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] R make errors
I tried to install the latest version of R (2-1.0)in anAIX machine. I was able to tar, and configure with no errors. However, when I said make, I got the following errors: gcc -Wl,-bM:SRE -Wl,-H512 -Wl,-T512 -Wl,-bnoentry -Wl,-bexpall -Wl,-bI:../../../etc/R.exp -L/usr/local/lib -o R_X11.so dataentry.lo devX11.lo rotated.lo rbitmap.lo -lSM -lICE -lX11 ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .log10 ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .floor ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .libintl_gettext ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .pow ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .sin ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .cos ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .tan ld: 0711-345 Use the -bloadmap or -bnoquiet option to obtain more information. collect2: ld returned 8 exit status make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 1. Stop. make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 2. I understand I have to edit the Makefile. Can someone tell me which Makefile(folder) and also which flags to edit. I greatly appreciate your help. Thanks Ambika Sundaresan Grad. Student UCSD. __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
RE: [Rd] segfault on large number of open brackets (PR#7859)
And this also fixes PR#7022 (a highly nested polynomial)
-thomas
On Thu, 12 May 2005, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that is coincidence, as I can see no source change that would
account for it.
2.0.1 and R-devel work for me and 2.1.0 segfaults with
999 KeepSource = *LOGICAL(GetOption(install(keep.source),
R_NilValue));
(gdb) bt
#0 0x080ca229 in ParseInit () at gram.y:999
#1 0x080cb305 in token () at gram.y:1530
I am not sure that is right, but I am pretty sure that
static char contextstack[50], *contextp;
just above is an unchecked nesting limit, as in
static void IfPush(void)
{
if (*contextp==LBRACE ||
*contextp=='['||
*contextp=='('||
*contextp == 'i')
*++contextp = 'i';
}
However, although I thought this was the problem, it seems only to apply
to nested if()s. So I do not currently have a solution.
I was almost right, just a different instance of *++contextp.
Fixed in R-patched, to give
(((
Error: contextstack overflow
--
Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UKFax: +44 1865 272595
__
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Thomas Lumley Assoc. Professor, Biostatistics
[EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Washington, Seattle
__
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Re: [Rd] R make errors
Please see the thread entitled: Implementing R on IBM p690 cluster Jump in this list's archives. We don't have a solution currently, but we do need some help. On Thu, 12 May 2005, Ambika Sundaresan wrote: I tried to install the latest version of R (2-1.0)in anAIX machine. I was able to tar, and configure with no errors. However, when I said make, I got the following errors: gcc -Wl,-bM:SRE -Wl,-H512 -Wl,-T512 -Wl,-bnoentry -Wl,-bexpall -Wl,-bI:../../../etc/R.exp -L/usr/local/lib -o R_X11.so dataentry.lo devX11.lo rotated.lo rbitmap.lo -lSM -lICE -lX11 ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .log10 ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .floor ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .libintl_gettext ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .pow ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .sin ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .cos ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .tan ld: 0711-345 Use the -bloadmap or -bnoquiet option to obtain more information. collect2: ld returned 8 exit status make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 1. Stop. make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 2. I understand I have to edit the Makefile. Can someone tell me which Makefile(folder) and also which flags to edit. I greatly appreciate your help. Thanks Ambika Sundaresan Grad. Student UCSD. __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UKFax: +44 1865 272595 __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[Rd] RFC822/M400 Mail Network -- Delivery Report (PR#7861)
--Delivery-Status-Report Not delivered to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] user agent unavailable --Delivery-Status-Report Content-Type: message/delivery-status Original-Envelope-Id: in*vsnl*rfc987;4284390b4708000mimey2k X400-Content-Identifier: 050513105010+053 Reporting-MTA: x400; /ADMD=VSNL/C=IN DSN-Gateway: smtp; terminator1.vsnl.net.in Final-Recipient: rfc822; S=chen/G=inter/PRMD=gems/ADMD=vsnl/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Diagnostic-Code: x400; 1 4 Status: 5.1.1 Last-Attempted-Date: 13 May 2005 10:36 +0530 X-Supplementary: Hello World --Delivery-Status-Report-- __ R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
