Re: [R] Creating a custom connection to read from multiple files

2005-01-21 Thread Tomas Kalibera
Hello Andy,
thanks for your examples, I rewrote everything to matrices  
lapply/sapply, rbind  calls instead of for-cycles  appends, it really 
helped. Reading files one by one and concatenating is now even faster 
than concatenating on disk, that 8MB table is read in 3.5 seconds.

Tomas
rbind is vectorized so you are using it (way) suboptimally.
   

Here's an example:
 

## Create a 500 x 100 data matrix.
x - matrix(rnorm(5e4), 500, 100)
## Generate 50 filenames.
fname - paste(f, formatC(1:50, width=2, flag=0), .txt, sep=)
## Write the data to files 50 times.
for (f in fname) write(t(x), file=f, ncol=ncol(x))
## Read the files into a list of data frames.
system.time(datList - lapply(fname, read.table, header=FALSE),
   

gcFirst=TRUE)
[1] 11.91  0.05 12.33NANA
 

## Specify colClasses to speed up.
system.time(datList - lapply(fname, read.table,
   

colClasses=rep(numeric, 100)),
+  gcFirst=TRUE)
[1] 10.69  0.07 10.79NANA
 

## Stack them together.
system.time(dat - do.call(rbind, datList), gcFirst=TRUE)
   

[1] 5.34 0.09 5.45   NA   NA
 

## Use matrices instead of data frames.
system.time(datList - lapply(fname, 
   

+  function(f) matrix(scan(f), ncol=100, byrow=TRUE)), gcFirst=TRUE)
Read 5 items
...
Read 5 items
[1]  9.49  0.08 15.06NANA
 

system.time(dat - do.call(rbind, datList), gcFirst=TRUE)
   

[1] 0.09 0.03 0.12   NA   NA
 

## Clean up the files.
unlink(fname)
   

A couple of points:
- Usually specifying colClasses will make read.table() quite a bit 
 faster, even though it's only marginally faster here.  Look back
 in the list archive to see examples.

- If your data files are all numerics (as in this example), 
 storing them in matrices will be much more efficient.  Note
 the difference in rbind()ing the 50 data frames and 50 
 matrices (5.34 seconds vs. 0.09!).  rbind.data.frame()
 needs to ensure that the resulting data frame has unique
 rownames (a requirement for a legit data frame), and
 that's probably taking a big chunk of the time.

Andy
 

__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html


[R] Creating a custom connection to read from multiple files

2005-01-20 Thread Tomas Kalibera
Hello,
is it possible to create my own connection which I could use with
read.table or scan ? I would like to create a connection that would read
from multiple files in sequence (like if they were concatenated),
possibly with an option to skip first n lines of each file. I would like
to avoid using platform specific scripts for that... (currently I invoke
/bin/cat from R to create a concatenation of all those files).
Thanks,
Tomas
__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html


Re: [R] Creating a custom connection to read from multiple files

2005-01-20 Thread Tomas Kalibera
Dear Prof Ripley,
thanks for your suggestions, it's very nice one can create custom 
connections directly in R and I think it is what I need just now.

However, what is wrong with reading a file at a time and combining the 
results in R using rbind?

Well, the problem is performance. If I concatenate all those files, they 
have around 8MB, can grow to tens of MBs in near future.

Both concatenating and reading from a single file by scan takes 5 
seconds (which is almost OK).

However, reading individual files by read.table and rbinding one by one 
( samples=rbind(samples, newSamples ) takes minutes. The same is when I 
concatenate lists manually. Scan does not help significantly. I guess 
there is some overhead in detecting dimensions of objects in rbind (?) 
or re-allocation or copying data ?

Best regards,
Tomas Kalibera
__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html


[R] Vertical labels on axes overlap

2005-01-06 Thread Tomas Kalibera
Hello,
when using horizontal labels (default) in plots on x-axis, R by default 
selects a subset of labels to plot so that the labels do not overlap. 
However, when using vertical labels, all labels are always drawn, even 
when they overlap. Is it a bug or do I have to adjust some magic parameter ?

the problem can be shown on these 2 tiny examples:
horizontal labels (default) [OK]:
 plot(1:100,axes=FALSE)
 axis(1,at=1:100,labels=rep(aaa,100))
(only a subset of labels is drawn)
vertical labels [THE PROBLEM]:
 plot(1:100,axes=FALSE)
 axis(1,at=1:100,labels=rep(aaa,100),las=2)
(all labels are drawn - and they do overlap)
Thanks,
Tomas
__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html