Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-24 Thread Steve Palincsar

On 11/23/2014 10:22 PM, Deacon Patrick wrote:
Steve, I was, saying the lower positioned on the bike the water is, 
the better. I was not saying the less the better.


Thanks for the clarification.  I totally misunderstood what you were 
saying, obviously.




With abandon,
Patrick

On Sunday, November 23, 2014 8:00:26 PM UTC-7, Steve Palincsar wrote:

On 11/23/2014 09:39 PM, Deacon Patrick wrote:
 Water is the heaviest item by volume you will carry. It pays to
get it
 as low as practicable.

And water is one of the few things that if you don't have it, you
can die.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-24 Thread Deacon Patrick
In my experience, weight of any kind travels better when lower, though I 
oddly prefer the SaddleSack to panniers. It may not be a big thing for you. 
With my vertigo, anything that effects the handling of the bike is 
trip-ending. I can't carry weight above my waist, so hydration packs are 
out for me as an option anyway, so I can't speak to the benefit of the 
weight being on me above my suspension (knees/elbows), vs. on the bike 
below suspension.

With abandon,
Patrick

On Sunday, November 23, 2014 9:06:26 PM UTC-7, Anne Paulson wrote:

 Why? Why should you get it low? I would have thought keeping it on 
 your back, above the suspension (your knees) would be better. 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-24 Thread Anne Paulson
A pint's a pound, which means 100 oz of water is a little over three
pounds. My body weight varies by more than three pounds from week to
week, and I don't notice that affects bike handling. I don't find the
three pound weight on my back noticeable as far as handling is
concerned.

I do notice, and don't like, having a sweaty back from a water
backpack, but I unfortunately have an auto-immune disease that makes
me have a dry mouth, so making it easy to sip water frequently is
important for me.

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Deacon Patrick lamontg...@mac.com wrote:
 In my experience, weight of any kind travels better when lower, though I
 oddly prefer the SaddleSack to panniers. It may not be a big thing for you.
 With my vertigo, anything that effects the handling of the bike is
 trip-ending. I can't carry weight above my waist, so hydration packs are out
 for me as an option anyway, so I can't speak to the benefit of the weight
 being on me above my suspension (knees/elbows), vs. on the bike below
 suspension.

 With abandon,
 Patrick

 On Sunday, November 23, 2014 9:06:26 PM UTC-7, Anne Paulson wrote:

 Why? Why should you get it low? I would have thought keeping it on
 your back, above the suspension (your knees) would be better.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
-- Anne Paulson

It isn't a contest. Enjoy the ride.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-24 Thread Anton Tutter
Anne,

The closer to the ground the weight is, the lower the center of gravity is, 
and the less your body's muscles are being used to correct the constant 
imbalances that occur on the bike and keep the bike upright. The bike will 
feel more stable and light.  It's one of the reason that the more stable 
riding cargo bikes utilize small 20 wheels.  It helps keep the load down 
low.

Also, with hydration packs strapped to your back, I'm going to guess that 
you're going to deal with more suspension losses since the pack can jiggle 
around (I've never worn one so I can't really say).  Keeping the heaviest 
weights secured tightly to the bike so they can't wiggle around reduces 
suspension losses.

Anton


On Sunday, November 23, 2014 11:06:26 PM UTC-5, Anne Paulson wrote:

 Why? Why should you get it low? I would have thought keeping it on 
 your back, above the suspension (your knees) would be better. 



 On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Deacon Patrick lamon...@mac.com 
 javascript: wrote: 
  Water is the heaviest item by volume you will carry. It pays to get it 
 as 
  low as practicable. 
  
  With abandon, 
  Patrick 
  
  
  On Sunday, November 23, 2014 7:36:49 PM UTC-7, ted wrote: 
  
  I think this 
  http://epicureancyclist.com/review-msr-dromedary-and-s-biners/ looks 
 fairly 
  nice. 
  
  On Sunday, November 23, 2014 6:26:13 PM UTC-8, Deacon Patrick wrote: 
  
  I don't remember. Wherever it works. Test before hand. Irish straps 
 are 
  beautiful! 
  
  With abandon, 
  Patrick 
  
  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups 
  RBW Owners Bunch group. 
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an 
  email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com javascript:. 
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com 
 javascript:. 
  Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. 
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 



 -- 
 -- Anne Paulson 

 It isn't a contest. Enjoy the ride. 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-24 Thread Anne Paulson
It's three pounds! Right now I weigh more than three pounds more than
my ideal cycling weight. I'd like to get rid of that weight, but I
don't notice even one tiny difference in bike handling because of it.
Also, in my experience-- and I wear a hydration pack every time I ride
except for around town rides-- hydration packs don't shift around.
They're designed not to shift around, because if they did it would be
really annoying and people would hate it.

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Anton Tutter atut...@gmail.com wrote:


 Also, with hydration packs strapped to your back, I'm going to guess that
 you're going to deal with more suspension losses since the pack can jiggle
 around (I've never worn one so I can't really say).  Keeping the heaviest
 weights secured tightly to the bike so they can't wiggle around reduces
 suspension losses.


-- 
-- Anne Paulson

It isn't a contest. Enjoy the ride.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-24 Thread Anton Tutter
There's a difference between 3 lbs of rider weight and 3 lbs of accessory 
weight.  The 3 lb of rider weight is distributed throughout the body, and 
as it accumulated, your musculature also adapted to deal with that extra 
weight. 

The point is, any weight that is loose and can wiggle is going to be 
noticed a lot more on the bike than if it doesn't. And the lower it is on 
the bike, the less it will impact your balance and handling of the bike.  
If the hydration pack doesn't shift around, great.  



On Monday, November 24, 2014 12:28:11 PM UTC-5, Anne Paulson wrote:

 It's three pounds! Right now I weigh more than three pounds more than 
 my ideal cycling weight. I'd like to get rid of that weight, but I 
 don't notice even one tiny difference in bike handling because of it. 
 Also, in my experience-- and I wear a hydration pack every time I ride 
 except for around town rides-- hydration packs don't shift around. 
 They're designed not to shift around, because if they did it would be 
 really annoying and people would hate it. 

 On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Anton Tutter atu...@gmail.com 
 javascript: wrote: 

  
  Also, with hydration packs strapped to your back, I'm going to guess 
 that 
  you're going to deal with more suspension losses since the pack can 
 jiggle 
  around (I've never worn one so I can't really say).  Keeping the 
 heaviest 
  weights secured tightly to the bike so they can't wiggle around reduces 
  suspension losses. 


 -- 
 -- Anne Paulson 

 It isn't a contest. Enjoy the ride. 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-24 Thread Metin Uz
Actually your math is off. 100oz is about 3L, or 3kg, or a little over 6 
pounds. I have used a 3L hydration pack on 200K and 300K rides, but would 
probably not like it on a multiple day ride.

--Metin

On Monday, November 24, 2014 8:39:18 AM UTC-8, Anne Paulson wrote:

 A pint's a pound, which means 100 oz of water is a little over three 
 pounds. My body weight varies by more than three pounds from week to 
 week, and I don't notice that affects bike handling. I don't find the 
 three pound weight on my back noticeable as far as handling is 
 concerned. 


  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-24 Thread Anne Paulson
You're right, it's six pounds not three. A pint's a pound, but a liter
is more or less a quart which is two pints. That was a stupid mistake
for me to make.

A quick eyeballing of bikepacking pictures shows the majority of
bikepackers wearing packs. But YMMV. For me, if I'm not using
panniers, which I don't on my Krampus, I just don't have a huge amount
of storage space on the bike. A hydration pack is the most convenient
place to store my water.

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Metin Uz uz.me...@gmail.com wrote:
 Actually your math is off. 100oz is about 3L, or 3kg, or a little over 6
 pounds. I have used a 3L hydration pack on 200K and 300K rides, but would
 probably not like it on a multiple day ride.

 --Metin

 On Monday, November 24, 2014 8:39:18 AM UTC-8, Anne Paulson wrote:

 A pint's a pound, which means 100 oz of water is a little over three
 pounds. My body weight varies by more than three pounds from week to
 week, and I don't notice that affects bike handling. I don't find the
 three pound weight on my back noticeable as far as handling is
 concerned.




 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
-- Anne Paulson

It isn't a contest. Enjoy the ride.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-24 Thread Jim M.
Riders wear large hydration packs for the entire Continental Divide race. 
If the pack fits well and one is accustomed to wearing it, it won't cause a 
problem even if theoretically the weight is better down lower. Jeez, the 
nits people will pick on this list.

jim m
wc ca

On Monday, November 24, 2014 10:49:11 AM UTC-8, Metin Uz wrote:

 Actually your math is off. 100oz is about 3L, or 3kg, or a little over 6 
 pounds. I have used a 3L hydration pack on 200K and 300K rides, but would 
 probably not like it on a multiple day ride.

 --Metin

 On Monday, November 24, 2014 8:39:18 AM UTC-8, Anne Paulson wrote:

 A pint's a pound, which means 100 oz of water is a little over three 
 pounds. My body weight varies by more than three pounds from week to 
 week, and I don't notice that affects bike handling. I don't find the 
 three pound weight on my back noticeable as far as handling is 
 concerned. 


  


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-24 Thread Deacon Patrick
Yeah. Folks who wear a backpack baffle me. I did a ride with a friend who 
didn't have panniers, so he brought a quality running pack to cary his gear 
for the day. Have the weight op that high annoyed him to no end, and he 
test rode without it and felt an amazing difference. All with about 10 
pounds of stuff. I have no idea how the folks wearing full backpacking 
packs when bikepacking do it.

With abandon,
Patrick

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-24 Thread Anne Paulson
They don't wear full backpacking packs, typically. They wear packs
designed for cyclists, like these:

http://www.rei.com/product/847872/camelbak-mule-hydration-pack-100-fl-oz
http://shop.camelbak.com/hawg-nv/d/1003_cl_3900
http://shop.camelbak.com/volt-13-lr/d/1247_cl_3426
http://www.ospreypacks.com/en/product/mens_1_1/raptor_14_1

I happen to have a Camelbak HAWG and a Camelback Volt and have worn
each one on numerous rides. I've not noticed any difference in
handling of the bike. They're fine. Where I live, a lot of people wear
hydration packs when they're riding off road. This is not unusual or
strange.

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Deacon Patrick lamontg...@mac.com wrote:
 Yeah. Folks who wear a backpack baffle me. I did a ride with a friend who
 didn't have panniers, so he brought a quality running pack to cary his gear
 for the day. Have the weight op that high annoyed him to no end, and he test
 rode without it and felt an amazing difference. All with about 10 pounds of
 stuff. I have no idea how the folks wearing full backpacking packs when
 bikepacking do it.

 With abandon,
 Patrick

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
-- Anne Paulson

It isn't a contest. Enjoy the ride.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-24 Thread Deacon Patrick
I know, and I don't get those, either. But I've seen bikepackers with full 
packs before. None of them understand my set up either, so it works out. I 
get odd questions like How do you fit through the narrow trails? when the 
SaddleSack is no wider than my body on the bike.

With abandon,
Patrick

On Monday, November 24, 2014 12:56:50 PM UTC-7, Anne Paulson wrote:

 They don't wear full backpacking packs, typically. They wear packs 
 designed for cyclists, like these: 

 http://www.rei.com/product/847872/camelbak-mule-hydration-pack-100-fl-oz 
 http://shop.camelbak.com/hawg-nv/d/1003_cl_3900 
 http://shop.camelbak.com/volt-13-lr/d/1247_cl_3426 
 http://www.ospreypacks.com/en/product/mens_1_1/raptor_14_1 

 I happen to have a Camelbak HAWG and a Camelback Volt and have worn 
 each one on numerous rides. I've not noticed any difference in 
 handling of the bike. They're fine. Where I live, a lot of people wear 
 hydration packs when they're riding off road. This is not unusual or 
 strange. 

 On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Deacon Patrick lamon...@mac.com 
 javascript: wrote: 
  Yeah. Folks who wear a backpack baffle me. I did a ride with a friend 
 who 
  didn't have panniers, so he brought a quality running pack to cary his 
 gear 
  for the day. Have the weight op that high annoyed him to no end, and he 
 test 
  rode without it and felt an amazing difference. All with about 10 pounds 
 of 
  stuff. I have no idea how the folks wearing full backpacking packs when 
  bikepacking do it. 
  
  With abandon, 
  Patrick 
  
  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups 
  RBW Owners Bunch group. 
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an 
  email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com javascript:. 
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com 
 javascript:. 
  Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. 
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 



 -- 
 -- Anne Paulson 

 It isn't a contest. Enjoy the ride. 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-24 Thread Goshen Peter
Hmm, riding around NYC I had the backpack full of crap for years. Once you
get used to it its really not a big deal. Now you if you just throw one on
for a ride for the first time year its gonna be different, sore shoulders,
weird pack moving sensation and the like but it only took me a couple of
weeks to get used to. My only issue with the camelback is I am really
sweaty and it made my back sweat more and it was really gross.

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Deacon Patrick lamontg...@mac.com wrote:

 I know, and I don't get those, either. But I've seen bikepackers with full
 packs before. None of them understand my set up either, so it works out. I
 get odd questions like How do you fit through the narrow trails? when the
 SaddleSack is no wider than my body on the bike.

 With abandon,
 Patrick

 On Monday, November 24, 2014 12:56:50 PM UTC-7, Anne Paulson wrote:

 They don't wear full backpacking packs, typically. They wear packs
 designed for cyclists, like these:

 http://www.rei.com/product/847872/camelbak-mule-hydration-pack-100-fl-oz
 http://shop.camelbak.com/hawg-nv/d/1003_cl_3900
 http://shop.camelbak.com/volt-13-lr/d/1247_cl_3426
 http://www.ospreypacks.com/en/product/mens_1_1/raptor_14_1

 I happen to have a Camelbak HAWG and a Camelback Volt and have worn
 each one on numerous rides. I've not noticed any difference in
 handling of the bike. They're fine. Where I live, a lot of people wear
 hydration packs when they're riding off road. This is not unusual or
 strange.

 On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Deacon Patrick lamon...@mac.com
 wrote:
  Yeah. Folks who wear a backpack baffle me. I did a ride with a friend
 who
  didn't have panniers, so he brought a quality running pack to cary his
 gear
  for the day. Have the weight op that high annoyed him to no end, and he
 test
  rode without it and felt an amazing difference. All with about 10
 pounds of
  stuff. I have no idea how the folks wearing full backpacking packs when
  bikepacking do it.
 
  With abandon,
  Patrick
 
  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
  RBW Owners Bunch group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an
  email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com.
  Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



 --
 -- Anne Paulson

 It isn't a contest. Enjoy the ride.

  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-23 Thread ted
Deacon and Anne, thanks for the info.
Do you put the 100oz hydro pack/blader in a bike mounted bag or are you 
wearing those on your back?
Anne, sounds like you plan to go with well under 2gal of water storage. 
Have I got that right?
I get that somebody stoping to sleep/camp needs a bunch of gear that a 
nonstop rider doesn't, but the 2gal that site mentions seems like a whole 
lot more than I thought folks usually carry on a day (or two) ride. Are the 
water needs for the fast movers that much less than for those going at a 
more leisurely pace?

thnks
Ted


On Saturday, November 22, 2014 10:34:15 AM UTC-8, Anne Paulson wrote:

 Because I'm taking the slow route, I'm going to carry way more stuff 
 than Jan. I'll have 

 tent 
 sleeping bag 
 pad 
 wool t shirt and lycra shorts for riding 
 wool jersey and wool legwarmers for riding when it's cold 
 off-bike clothes (I can't sit around in wet cycling clothing; I get 
 immediately chilled) 
 second pair of shorts (I know you guys can wear the same shorts two 
 days in a row, but that does not work for me at all) 
 wool hat 
 puffy jacket 
 rain clothes 
 little cookset of Trangia burner, titanium pot, Westwind pot stand, cup, 
 spork 
 food 
 Ursack food bag to protect food from marauders 
 100 oz hydration pack 
 couple of 1 liter bladders for no-water section 
 water filter 
 food 
 tools, spare tubes 
 soap 
 first aid kit 
 bandannas, 1001 uses 
 meds  toiletries 
 probably my Tilley hat with a brim, for sun 
 probably some Crocs 

 The hydration pack plus the two bladders is about 5 liters. I might 
 also in the no-water section carry more water, not sure. I'm going to 
 have to camp dry one night. 

 On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 9:55 AM, ted ted@comcast.net javascript: 
 wrote: 
  I am intrigued by the route but hough the trip sounds very appealing, it 
  also sounds very daunting. 
  For example this from http://velodirt.com/the-oregon-outback/: 
   ... At the longest no-water section we each carried 2+ gallons of 
 water. 
  ... 
  
  Yet Jan Heine did it on a rando bike, and several riders did it in about 
 a 
  day and a half. 
  
  In another thread several posters say they are planing to do the ride 
 next 
  season. If some of them would comment on how much stuff they plan to 
 carry 
  and how they deal with water I would appreciate it. I am not sure how I 
  would go about hauling 2+ gallons on my bike. Grocery panniers and a 
 milk 
  jug on either side? 
  
  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups 
  RBW Owners Bunch group. 
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an 
  email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com javascript:. 
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com 
 javascript:. 
  Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. 
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 



 -- 
 -- Anne Paulson 

 It isn't a contest. Enjoy the ride. 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-23 Thread Deacon Patrick
I strap the 100oz bladder to the frame.

With abandon,
Patrick

On Sunday, November 23, 2014 7:00:11 PM UTC-7, ted wrote:

 Deacon and Anne, thanks for the info.
 Do you put the 100oz hydro pack/blader in a bike mounted bag or are you 
 wearing those on your back?
 Anne, sounds like you plan to go with well under 2gal of water storage. 
 Have I got that right?
 I get that somebody stoping to sleep/camp needs a bunch of gear that a 
 nonstop rider doesn't, but the 2gal that site mentions seems like a whole 
 lot more than I thought folks usually carry on a day (or two) ride. Are the 
 water needs for the fast movers that much less than for those going at a 
 more leisurely pace?

 thnks
 Ted


 On Saturday, November 22, 2014 10:34:15 AM UTC-8, Anne Paulson wrote:

 Because I'm taking the slow route, I'm going to carry way more stuff 
 than Jan. I'll have 

 tent 
 sleeping bag 
 pad 
 wool t shirt and lycra shorts for riding 
 wool jersey and wool legwarmers for riding when it's cold 
 off-bike clothes (I can't sit around in wet cycling clothing; I get 
 immediately chilled) 
 second pair of shorts (I know you guys can wear the same shorts two 
 days in a row, but that does not work for me at all) 
 wool hat 
 puffy jacket 
 rain clothes 
 little cookset of Trangia burner, titanium pot, Westwind pot stand, cup, 
 spork 
 food 
 Ursack food bag to protect food from marauders 
 100 oz hydration pack 
 couple of 1 liter bladders for no-water section 
 water filter 
 food 
 tools, spare tubes 
 soap 
 first aid kit 
 bandannas, 1001 uses 
 meds  toiletries 
 probably my Tilley hat with a brim, for sun 
 probably some Crocs 

 The hydration pack plus the two bladders is about 5 liters. I might 
 also in the no-water section carry more water, not sure. I'm going to 
 have to camp dry one night. 

 On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 9:55 AM, ted ted@comcast.net wrote: 
  I am intrigued by the route but hough the trip sounds very appealing, 
 it 
  also sounds very daunting. 
  For example this from http://velodirt.com/the-oregon-outback/: 
   ... At the longest no-water section we each carried 2+ gallons of 
 water. 
  ... 
  
  Yet Jan Heine did it on a rando bike, and several riders did it in 
 about a 
  day and a half. 
  
  In another thread several posters say they are planing to do the ride 
 next 
  season. If some of them would comment on how much stuff they plan to 
 carry 
  and how they deal with water I would appreciate it. I am not sure how I 
  would go about hauling 2+ gallons on my bike. Grocery panniers and a 
 milk 
  jug on either side? 
  
  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups 
  RBW Owners Bunch group. 
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an 
  email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com. 
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com. 
  Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. 
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 



 -- 
 -- Anne Paulson 

 It isn't a contest. Enjoy the ride. 



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-23 Thread ted
In the main triangle along with the bottle cages? Guess it pays to ride a 
big frame.

On Sunday, November 23, 2014 6:07:56 PM UTC-8, Deacon Patrick wrote:

 I strap the 100oz bladder to the frame.

 With abandon,
 Patrick

 On Sunday, November 23, 2014 7:00:11 PM UTC-7, ted wrote:

 Deacon and Anne, thanks for the info.
 Do you put the 100oz hydro pack/blader in a bike mounted bag or are you 
 wearing those on your back?
 Anne, sounds like you plan to go with well under 2gal of water storage. 
 Have I got that right?
 I get that somebody stoping to sleep/camp needs a bunch of gear that a 
 nonstop rider doesn't, but the 2gal that site mentions seems like a whole 
 lot more than I thought folks usually carry on a day (or two) ride. Are the 
 water needs for the fast movers that much less than for those going at a 
 more leisurely pace?

 thnks
 Ted


 On Saturday, November 22, 2014 10:34:15 AM UTC-8, Anne Paulson wrote:

 Because I'm taking the slow route, I'm going to carry way more stuff 
 than Jan. I'll have 

 tent 
 sleeping bag 
 pad 
 wool t shirt and lycra shorts for riding 
 wool jersey and wool legwarmers for riding when it's cold 
 off-bike clothes (I can't sit around in wet cycling clothing; I get 
 immediately chilled) 
 second pair of shorts (I know you guys can wear the same shorts two 
 days in a row, but that does not work for me at all) 
 wool hat 
 puffy jacket 
 rain clothes 
 little cookset of Trangia burner, titanium pot, Westwind pot stand, cup, 
 spork 
 food 
 Ursack food bag to protect food from marauders 
 100 oz hydration pack 
 couple of 1 liter bladders for no-water section 
 water filter 
 food 
 tools, spare tubes 
 soap 
 first aid kit 
 bandannas, 1001 uses 
 meds  toiletries 
 probably my Tilley hat with a brim, for sun 
 probably some Crocs 

 The hydration pack plus the two bladders is about 5 liters. I might 
 also in the no-water section carry more water, not sure. I'm going to 
 have to camp dry one night. 

 On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 9:55 AM, ted ted@comcast.net wrote: 
  I am intrigued by the route but hough the trip sounds very appealing, 
 it 
  also sounds very daunting. 
  For example this from http://velodirt.com/the-oregon-outback/: 
   ... At the longest no-water section we each carried 2+ gallons of 
 water. 
  ... 
  
  Yet Jan Heine did it on a rando bike, and several riders did it in 
 about a 
  day and a half. 
  
  In another thread several posters say they are planing to do the ride 
 next 
  season. If some of them would comment on how much stuff they plan to 
 carry 
  and how they deal with water I would appreciate it. I am not sure how 
 I 
  would go about hauling 2+ gallons on my bike. Grocery panniers and a 
 milk 
  jug on either side? 
  
  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups 
  RBW Owners Bunch group. 
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an 
  email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com. 
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com. 
  Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. 
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 



 -- 
 -- Anne Paulson 

 It isn't a contest. Enjoy the ride. 



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-23 Thread Anne Paulson
I wear a 100 oz hydration pack. With two 1-liter bags, that's 5
liters. And I'll probably
carry two or three water bottles in the really dry sections. I'm going
to be around 2 gallons, I guess. Not sure really.

On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 6:00 PM, ted ted.ke...@comcast.net wrote:
 Deacon and Anne, thanks for the info.
 Do you put the 100oz hydro pack/blader in a bike mounted bag or are you
 wearing those on your back?
 Anne, sounds like you plan to go with well under 2gal of water storage. Have
 I got that right?
 I get that somebody stoping to sleep/camp needs a bunch of gear that a
 nonstop rider doesn't, but the 2gal that site mentions seems like a whole
 lot more than I thought folks usually carry on a day (or two) ride. Are the
 water needs for the fast movers that much less than for those going at a
 more leisurely pace?

 thnks
 Ted


 On Saturday, November 22, 2014 10:34:15 AM UTC-8, Anne Paulson wrote:

 Because I'm taking the slow route, I'm going to carry way more stuff
 than Jan. I'll have

 tent
 sleeping bag
 pad
 wool t shirt and lycra shorts for riding
 wool jersey and wool legwarmers for riding when it's cold
 off-bike clothes (I can't sit around in wet cycling clothing; I get
 immediately chilled)
 second pair of shorts (I know you guys can wear the same shorts two
 days in a row, but that does not work for me at all)
 wool hat
 puffy jacket
 rain clothes
 little cookset of Trangia burner, titanium pot, Westwind pot stand, cup,
 spork
 food
 Ursack food bag to protect food from marauders
 100 oz hydration pack
 couple of 1 liter bladders for no-water section
 water filter
 food
 tools, spare tubes
 soap
 first aid kit
 bandannas, 1001 uses
 meds  toiletries
 probably my Tilley hat with a brim, for sun
 probably some Crocs

 The hydration pack plus the two bladders is about 5 liters. I might
 also in the no-water section carry more water, not sure. I'm going to
 have to camp dry one night.

 On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 9:55 AM, ted ted@comcast.net wrote:
  I am intrigued by the route but hough the trip sounds very appealing, it
  also sounds very daunting.
  For example this from http://velodirt.com/the-oregon-outback/:
   ... At the longest no-water section we each carried 2+ gallons of
  water.
  ...
 
  Yet Jan Heine did it on a rando bike, and several riders did it in about
  a
  day and a half.
 
  In another thread several posters say they are planing to do the ride
  next
  season. If some of them would comment on how much stuff they plan to
  carry
  and how they deal with water I would appreciate it. I am not sure how I
  would go about hauling 2+ gallons on my bike. Grocery panniers and a
  milk
  jug on either side?
 
  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
  Groups
  RBW Owners Bunch group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
  an
  email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com.
  Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



 --
 -- Anne Paulson

 It isn't a contest. Enjoy the ride.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
-- Anne Paulson

It isn't a contest. Enjoy the ride.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-23 Thread Deacon Patrick
I don't remember. Wherever it works. Test before hand. Irish straps are 
beautiful!

With abandon,
Patrick

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-23 Thread ted
I think there are 3.785 liters in a gallon or about 7.5 liters for 2 
gallons.
Your 5 liters is abt 1 and 1/3 gallons. With 3 28oz bottles like Deacon 
carries thats another ~2/3 of a gallon.
So yea I guess that puts you at ~2gal for the longer dry stretches. 
Thanks for setting me straight.


On Sunday, November 23, 2014 6:15:23 PM UTC-8, Anne Paulson wrote:

 I wear a 100 oz hydration pack. With two 1-liter bags, that's 5 
 liters. And I'll probably 
 carry two or three water bottles in the really dry sections. I'm going 
 to be around 2 gallons, I guess. Not sure really. 

 On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 6:00 PM, ted ted@comcast.net javascript: 
 wrote: 
  Deacon and Anne, thanks for the info. 
  Do you put the 100oz hydro pack/blader in a bike mounted bag or are you 
  wearing those on your back? 
  Anne, sounds like you plan to go with well under 2gal of water storage. 
 Have 
  I got that right? 
  I get that somebody stoping to sleep/camp needs a bunch of gear that a 
  nonstop rider doesn't, but the 2gal that site mentions seems like a 
 whole 
  lot more than I thought folks usually carry on a day (or two) ride. Are 
 the 
  water needs for the fast movers that much less than for those going at a 
  more leisurely pace? 
  
  thnks 
  Ted 
  
  
  On Saturday, November 22, 2014 10:34:15 AM UTC-8, Anne Paulson wrote: 
  
  Because I'm taking the slow route, I'm going to carry way more stuff 
  than Jan. I'll have 
  
  tent 
  sleeping bag 
  pad 
  wool t shirt and lycra shorts for riding 
  wool jersey and wool legwarmers for riding when it's cold 
  off-bike clothes (I can't sit around in wet cycling clothing; I get 
  immediately chilled) 
  second pair of shorts (I know you guys can wear the same shorts two 
  days in a row, but that does not work for me at all) 
  wool hat 
  puffy jacket 
  rain clothes 
  little cookset of Trangia burner, titanium pot, Westwind pot stand, 
 cup, 
  spork 
  food 
  Ursack food bag to protect food from marauders 
  100 oz hydration pack 
  couple of 1 liter bladders for no-water section 
  water filter 
  food 
  tools, spare tubes 
  soap 
  first aid kit 
  bandannas, 1001 uses 
  meds  toiletries 
  probably my Tilley hat with a brim, for sun 
  probably some Crocs 
  
  The hydration pack plus the two bladders is about 5 liters. I might 
  also in the no-water section carry more water, not sure. I'm going to 
  have to camp dry one night. 
  
  On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 9:55 AM, ted ted@comcast.net wrote: 
   I am intrigued by the route but hough the trip sounds very appealing, 
 it 
   also sounds very daunting. 
   For example this from http://velodirt.com/the-oregon-outback/: 
... At the longest no-water section we each carried 2+ gallons of 
   water. 
   ... 
   
   Yet Jan Heine did it on a rando bike, and several riders did it in 
 about 
   a 
   day and a half. 
   
   In another thread several posters say they are planing to do the ride 
   next 
   season. If some of them would comment on how much stuff they plan to 
   carry 
   and how they deal with water I would appreciate it. I am not sure how 
 I 
   would go about hauling 2+ gallons on my bike. Grocery panniers and a 
   milk 
   jug on either side? 
   
   -- 
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
   Groups 
   RBW Owners Bunch group. 
   To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
 send 
   an 
   email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com. 
   To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com. 
   Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. 
   For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
  
  
  
  -- 
  -- Anne Paulson 
  
  It isn't a contest. Enjoy the ride. 
  
  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups 
  RBW Owners Bunch group. 
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an 
  email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com javascript:. 
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com 
 javascript:. 
  Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. 
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 



 -- 
 -- Anne Paulson 

 It isn't a contest. Enjoy the ride. 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-23 Thread ted
I think this http://epicureancyclist.com/review-msr-dromedary-and-s-biners/ 
looks fairly nice.

On Sunday, November 23, 2014 6:26:13 PM UTC-8, Deacon Patrick wrote:

 I don't remember. Wherever it works. Test before hand. Irish straps are 
 beautiful!

 With abandon,
 Patrick


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-23 Thread Deacon Patrick
Water is the heaviest item by volume you will carry. It pays to get it as 
low as practicable.

With abandon,
Patrick

On Sunday, November 23, 2014 7:36:49 PM UTC-7, ted wrote:

 I think this 
 http://epicureancyclist.com/review-msr-dromedary-and-s-biners/ looks 
 fairly nice.

 On Sunday, November 23, 2014 6:26:13 PM UTC-8, Deacon Patrick wrote:

 I don't remember. Wherever it works. Test before hand. Irish straps are 
 beautiful!

 With abandon,
 Patrick



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-23 Thread Steve Palincsar

On 11/23/2014 09:39 PM, Deacon Patrick wrote:
Water is the heaviest item by volume you will carry. It pays to get it 
as low as practicable.


And water is one of the few things that if you don't have it, you can die.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-23 Thread Deacon Patrick
Steve, I was, saying the lower positioned on the bike the water is, the 
better. I was not saying the less the better.

With abandon,
Patrick 

On Sunday, November 23, 2014 8:00:26 PM UTC-7, Steve Palincsar wrote:

 On 11/23/2014 09:39 PM, Deacon Patrick wrote: 
  Water is the heaviest item by volume you will carry. It pays to get it 
  as low as practicable. 

 And water is one of the few things that if you don't have it, you can die. 




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-23 Thread Anne Paulson
Why? Why should you get it low? I would have thought keeping it on
your back, above the suspension (your knees) would be better.



On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Deacon Patrick lamontg...@mac.com wrote:
 Water is the heaviest item by volume you will carry. It pays to get it as
 low as practicable.

 With abandon,
 Patrick


 On Sunday, November 23, 2014 7:36:49 PM UTC-7, ted wrote:

 I think this
 http://epicureancyclist.com/review-msr-dromedary-and-s-biners/ looks fairly
 nice.

 On Sunday, November 23, 2014 6:26:13 PM UTC-8, Deacon Patrick wrote:

 I don't remember. Wherever it works. Test before hand. Irish straps are
 beautiful!

 With abandon,
 Patrick

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
-- Anne Paulson

It isn't a contest. Enjoy the ride.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-23 Thread ted
Ok. Seems like the usual locations for bottle cages on the down and seat 
tubes do that, but once those spaces are taken finding someplace for 
another say gallon and a half on a small or medium size bike presents some 
challenges. I suppose you can put containers in the bottom of a pannier but 
thats not very convenient for access.

On Sunday, November 23, 2014 6:39:09 PM UTC-8, Deacon Patrick wrote:

 Water is the heaviest item by volume you will carry. It pays to get it as 
 low as practicable.

 With abandon,
 Patrick

 On Sunday, November 23, 2014 7:36:49 PM UTC-7, ted wrote:

 I think this 
 http://epicureancyclist.com/review-msr-dromedary-and-s-biners/ looks 
 fairly nice.

 On Sunday, November 23, 2014 6:26:13 PM UTC-8, Deacon Patrick wrote:

 I don't remember. Wherever it works. Test before hand. Irish straps are 
 beautiful!

 With abandon,
 Patrick



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-23 Thread ted
Sounds reasonable and if it works well for you thats great. I usually 
prefer not to have a pack on if I am riding for a long time. I would rather 
have what I need attached to the bike somehow.

On Sunday, November 23, 2014 8:06:26 PM UTC-8, Anne Paulson wrote:

 Why? Why should you get it low? I would have thought keeping it on 
 your back, above the suspension (your knees) would be better. 



 On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Deacon Patrick lamon...@mac.com 
 javascript: wrote: 
  Water is the heaviest item by volume you will carry. It pays to get it 
 as 
  low as practicable. 
  
  With abandon, 
  Patrick 
  
  
  On Sunday, November 23, 2014 7:36:49 PM UTC-7, ted wrote: 
  
  I think this 
  http://epicureancyclist.com/review-msr-dromedary-and-s-biners/ looks 
 fairly 
  nice. 
  
  On Sunday, November 23, 2014 6:26:13 PM UTC-8, Deacon Patrick wrote: 
  
  I don't remember. Wherever it works. Test before hand. Irish straps 
 are 
  beautiful! 
  
  With abandon, 
  Patrick 
  
  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups 
  RBW Owners Bunch group. 
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an 
  email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com javascript:. 
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com 
 javascript:. 
  Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. 
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 



 -- 
 -- Anne Paulson 

 It isn't a contest. Enjoy the ride. 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-22 Thread ted
I am intrigued by the route but hough the trip sounds very appealing, it 
also sounds very daunting.
For example this from http://velodirt.com/the-oregon-outback/:
 ... At the longest no-water section we each carried 2+ gallons of water. 
...

Yet Jan Heine did it on a rando bike, and several riders did it in about a 
day and a half.

In another thread several posters say they are planing to do the ride next 
season. If some of them would comment on how much stuff they plan to carry 
and how they deal with water I would appreciate it. I am not sure how I 
would go about hauling 2+ gallons on my bike. Grocery panniers and a milk 
jug on either side?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Oregon Outback and water

2014-11-22 Thread Anne Paulson
Because I'm taking the slow route, I'm going to carry way more stuff
than Jan. I'll have

tent
sleeping bag
pad
wool t shirt and lycra shorts for riding
wool jersey and wool legwarmers for riding when it's cold
off-bike clothes (I can't sit around in wet cycling clothing; I get
immediately chilled)
second pair of shorts (I know you guys can wear the same shorts two
days in a row, but that does not work for me at all)
wool hat
puffy jacket
rain clothes
little cookset of Trangia burner, titanium pot, Westwind pot stand, cup, spork
food
Ursack food bag to protect food from marauders
100 oz hydration pack
couple of 1 liter bladders for no-water section
water filter
food
tools, spare tubes
soap
first aid kit
bandannas, 1001 uses
meds  toiletries
probably my Tilley hat with a brim, for sun
probably some Crocs

The hydration pack plus the two bladders is about 5 liters. I might
also in the no-water section carry more water, not sure. I'm going to
have to camp dry one night.

On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 9:55 AM, ted ted.ke...@comcast.net wrote:
 I am intrigued by the route but hough the trip sounds very appealing, it
 also sounds very daunting.
 For example this from http://velodirt.com/the-oregon-outback/:
  ... At the longest no-water section we each carried 2+ gallons of water.
 ...

 Yet Jan Heine did it on a rando bike, and several riders did it in about a
 day and a half.

 In another thread several posters say they are planing to do the ride next
 season. If some of them would comment on how much stuff they plan to carry
 and how they deal with water I would appreciate it. I am not sure how I
 would go about hauling 2+ gallons on my bike. Grocery panniers and a milk
 jug on either side?

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
-- Anne Paulson

It isn't a contest. Enjoy the ride.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.