[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-02 Thread Philip Williamson
Earlier this year the minimum was SEVEN! What happened? And even
though I would be happy with one bike... I do have three.
I would love a Fargo. And a Roadeo. And before that, I wanted a
Pugsley. And before that, a Kogswell Porteur. But I just keep riding
my Quickbeam, and my mountain bike, and my 'pick up the slack Ross.
Sometimes I ride my wife's 3-speed Steyr, but I'm forbidden to raise
the seat.

I noticed a while ago that everyone buys the same jacket again and
again. No one else even knows they got a new jacket. It's the same
with bikes.

What I need a bike to do is carry me and some groceries to work and
home. Go for longer rides in the countryside on steep gravel roads
with a dog. That's not an extensive spec. The mountain bike won't
carry groceries, the Ross won't sketch down the vertical trails around
here. The Quickbeam will do both, but the Ross is better at the CSA
run, and the Bontrager is better at hanging off the back and rolling
out the steep bits. A real front rack and a narrower saddle, and the
QB would be 98% of the other two, instead of 90%.

 Philip
www.biketinker.com

this song is about a murder at a drive-in...

On Sep 1, 8:21 pm, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:
 The Powers that Be have just cut the statutory minimum number of
 bicycles from five to four: gofast; gofast commuter (just first gofast
 but with fenders, lights, rack); beater that is as close to the second
 gofast as possible but much cheaper so that you actually enjoy riding
 it to Costco or Albertsons but, if it were stolen, you would week only
 briefly. Next, off road bike; and, I had added tourer. But I am
 hoping that the Fargo will coalesce the last two into a unity with two
 separate wheelsets.





 On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:45 PM, EricP ericpl...@aol.com wrote:
  Well, I'm at 4 (or 3 1/2 since one is a folder).  And to be quite
  honest, three are somewhat overlapping.  Yes, I could maybe, possibly,
  get by with one bike (my Sam Hillborne).  But then I'd feel guilty
  riding it through the slush/ice/snow of winter knowing the frame will
  probably rot in about 5 or 6 years due to inattentive maintenance.
  Right there, need a winter beater.

  Then riding a poorly maintained rail-trail a week or so ago on the
  Hillborne, realized that a bike that takes wider than 40s would be
  more appropriate for that task.  Again, another bike.

  So, while something like a Hunqapillar could, in theory, work as an
  only, too many other variables intervene.  Not the least of which is
  my history of collecting/hoarding stuff.

  Then again, while in college, did only have one bike.  A Specialized
  Stumpjumper.  So have done it.  Just not positive I'd want to go that
  route again.

  BTW, I'm in the opposite camp on racing.  Do have some interest in the
  pros, but no interest whatsoever in a gofast type of bike.  My
  riding style is just entirely wrong for it.

  On Sep 1, 4:56 pm, Bill Connell bconn...@gmail.com wrote:
  I'm down to a nearly all-time low of 3 bikes. What i've figured out
  with the single bike notion is that, for me, the goal of having one
  bike isn't worth the hassle of changing that bike for different uses.
  I do switch my 'cross bike from commuter to racer and back once a
  year, but i get tired of swapping out wheels and bags and whatnot just
  for a weekend of dirt riding. Likewise, i rode many years on a MB4 and
  got tired of the way it handled on the road with slicks.

  I'm not a racer or extreme rider by any means, but i do enjoy tools
  that are reasonably well-suited to the job, and my riding is diverse
  enough that i have a hard time getting below 2-3 bikes.

  On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:26 PM, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:
   Define enough.

   On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Pondero cj.spin...@gmail.com wrote:
   ...but can one bike do enough?

  --
  Bill Connell
  St. Paul, MN

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
  RBW Owners Bunch group.
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
  rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group 
  athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

 --
 Patrick Moore
 Albuquerque, NM
 For professional resumes, contact
 Patrick Moore, ACRW at resumespecialt...@gmail.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread Pondero
Enough, as I imagined it, would be sufficient for a given person.  In
other words, might it possible that someone might have a sufficiently
narrow use range, so that one versatile bike could satisfy?

Yeah, you're right, probably not.  Not if that someone really likes
bicycles.

On Aug 31, 8:26 pm, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:
 Define enough.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread William
OK, I'll play:

one bike can't do it all - I've tried. 

define can't.  With a Bombadil and maybe 4 sets of tires and maybe 3
handlebar/cockpit setups, I'd argue that there is no ride under the
big umbrella of it all' that this theoretical one bike can't do.
In order to say that it can't, I think you'd have to bring in
qualitative stuff like my Bombadil with road tires and drop bars can't
be 23 lbs.  Or that a moderate fitness level person can't keep up with
similarly fit riders on MRCBs.  Or that nobody could win the Tuesday
night Crit on it.

Don't get me wrong, I'm the last person in the world that would try to
get by with one bike, but if I did want to live in a studio apartment
and have only one bike, I bet I could have something that could cover
everything I wanted to do on a bike, and that there would be nothing
that I wanted to do on a bike that could not be done on that one
bike.

On Aug 31, 6:26 pm, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:
 Define enough.

 On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Pondero cj.spin...@gmail.com wrote:
  ...but can one bike do enough?

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
  RBW Owners Bunch group.
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
  rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group 
  athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

 --
 Patrick Moore
 Albuquerque, NM
 For professional resumes, contact
 Patrick Moore, ACRW at resumespecialt...@gmail.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread JoelMatthews
 define can't.  With a Bombadil and maybe 4 sets of tires and maybe 3
 handlebar/cockpit setups, I'd argue that there is no ride under the
 big umbrella of it all' that this theoretical one bike can't do.
 In order to say that it can't, I think you'd have to bring in
 qualitative stuff like my Bombadil with road tires and drop bars can't
 be 23 lbs.  Or that a moderate fitness level person can't keep up with
 similarly fit riders on MRCBs.  Or that nobody could win the Tuesday
 night Crit on it.

Not so much the competition stuff - I could care less about organized
amateur (or pro for that matter) riding.  But rather the certain
magical ride quality a bike made with thin wall tubing, be it 531,
Columbia SL or the modern equivalents the Bomb could never match.

If the Bomb owner does not care about this admittedly subjective
pleasure, than maybe the Bomb is the only bike needed.

For me if I were to have only one bike it would probably be a Hilsen.
Maybe 650b so I could use real fat tires for off/rough road.

On Sep 1, 9:43 am, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:
 OK, I'll play:

 one bike can't do it all - I've tried. 

 define can't.  With a Bombadil and maybe 4 sets of tires and maybe 3
 handlebar/cockpit setups, I'd argue that there is no ride under the
 big umbrella of it all' that this theoretical one bike can't do.
 In order to say that it can't, I think you'd have to bring in
 qualitative stuff like my Bombadil with road tires and drop bars can't
 be 23 lbs.  Or that a moderate fitness level person can't keep up with
 similarly fit riders on MRCBs.  Or that nobody could win the Tuesday
 night Crit on it.

 Don't get me wrong, I'm the last person in the world that would try to
 get by with one bike, but if I did want to live in a studio apartment
 and have only one bike, I bet I could have something that could cover
 everything I wanted to do on a bike, and that there would be nothing
 that I wanted to do on a bike that could not be done on that one
 bike.

 On Aug 31, 6:26 pm, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:



  Define enough.

  On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Pondero cj.spin...@gmail.com wrote:
   ...but can one bike do enough?

   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
   RBW Owners Bunch group.
   To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
   rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit this group 
   athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

  --
  Patrick Moore
  Albuquerque, NM
  For professional resumes, contact
  Patrick Moore, ACRW at resumespecialt...@gmail.com- Hide quoted text -

 - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread Michael_S
I've considered this subject a few times recently. I am hoping to semi-
retire next year and relocate to smaller place near the ocean, perhaps
with only a one car garage. what bike or what few bikes would I choose
to do the riding Ilike to do. I would want a lightweight fast road
bike with 28mm tires, an allrounder that could handle 40mm tires, a
touring bike with racks, a bomber mountain bike with 2.2 knobbies and
a cheap urban bike that won't attack attention locked to a pole. I
also need to consider space for our tandem and wifes urban bike.

I can't see to get down to below 2. Maybe a 650B Hilsen with two
wheelsets and perhaps a Hunqapillar, Bombadil or Fargo would work.

On 2nd thought I better look for a two car garage.

~Mike~




On Sep 1, 8:20 am, JoelMatthews joelmatth...@mac.com wrote:
  define can't.  With a Bombadil and maybe 4 sets of tires and maybe 3
  handlebar/cockpit setups, I'd argue that there is no ride under the
  big umbrella of it all' that this theoretical one bike can't do.
  In order to say that it can't, I think you'd have to bring in
  qualitative stuff like my Bombadil with road tires and drop bars can't
  be 23 lbs.  Or that a moderate fitness level person can't keep up with
  similarly fit riders on MRCBs.  Or that nobody could win the Tuesday
  night Crit on it.

 Not so much the competition stuff - I could care less about organized
 amateur (or pro for that matter) riding.  But rather the certain
 magical ride quality a bike made with thin wall tubing, be it 531,
 Columbia SL or the modern equivalents the Bomb could never match.

 If the Bomb owner does not care about this admittedly subjective
 pleasure, than maybe the Bomb is the only bike needed.

 For me if I were to have only one bike it would probably be a Hilsen.
 Maybe 650b so I could use real fat tires for off/rough road.

 On Sep 1, 9:43 am, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:



  OK, I'll play:

  one bike can't do it all - I've tried. 

  define can't.  With a Bombadil and maybe 4 sets of tires and maybe 3
  handlebar/cockpit setups, I'd argue that there is no ride under the
  big umbrella of it all' that this theoretical one bike can't do.
  In order to say that it can't, I think you'd have to bring in
  qualitative stuff like my Bombadil with road tires and drop bars can't
  be 23 lbs.  Or that a moderate fitness level person can't keep up with
  similarly fit riders on MRCBs.  Or that nobody could win the Tuesday
  night Crit on it.

  Don't get me wrong, I'm the last person in the world that would try to
  get by with one bike, but if I did want to live in a studio apartment
  and have only one bike, I bet I could have something that could cover
  everything I wanted to do on a bike, and that there would be nothing
  that I wanted to do on a bike that could not be done on that one
  bike.

  On Aug 31, 6:26 pm, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:

   Define enough.

   On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Pondero cj.spin...@gmail.com wrote:
...but can one bike do enough?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups RBW Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group 
athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

   --
   Patrick Moore
   Albuquerque, NM
   For professional resumes, contact
   Patrick Moore, ACRW at resumespecialt...@gmail.com- Hide quoted text -

  - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

 - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread PATRICK MOORE
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:43 AM, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:
 OK, I'll play:

 one bike can't do it all - I've tried. 

 define can't.

Well parried. I mean, in my own case, I *do* want at least one, light,
fast as possible road bike with all the qualities of top road bike
handling -- and this is what rules out a heavier, heavier wheeled,
slower handling bike -- can't speak of the Bombadil since I've not
ridden it, but it certainly rules out the Sam Hill.

I know what you mean; I tried it myself once, but gave up -- too much
compromise between -- in my case -- ability to negotiate sandy soil
and fast road type handling and feel. Each to his own, I guess. But I
do maintain that it is not possible for me.

With a Bombadil and maybe 4 sets of tires and maybe 3
 handlebar/cockpit setups, I'd argue that there is no ride under the
 big umbrella of it all' that this theoretical one bike can't do.
 In order to say that it can't, I think you'd have to bring in
 qualitative stuff like my Bombadil with road tires and drop bars can't
 be 23 lbs.  Or that a moderate fitness level person can't keep up with
 similarly fit riders on MRCBs.  Or that nobody could win the Tuesday
 night Crit on it.

 Don't get me wrong, I'm the last person in the world that would try to
 get by with one bike, but if I did want to live in a studio apartment
 and have only one bike, I bet I could have something that could cover
 everything I wanted to do on a bike, and that there would be nothing
 that I wanted to do on a bike that could not be done on that one
 bike.

 On Aug 31, 6:26 pm, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:
 Define enough.

 On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Pondero cj.spin...@gmail.com wrote:
  ...but can one bike do enough?

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
  RBW Owners Bunch group.
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
  rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group 
  athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

 --
 Patrick Moore
 Albuquerque, NM
 For professional resumes, contact
 Patrick Moore, ACRW at resumespecialt...@gmail.com

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.





-- 
Patrick Moore
Albuquerque, NM
For professional resumes, contact
Patrick Moore, ACRW at resumespecialt...@gmail.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread William
Well parried.

I'm glad you took as intended, just playing with words.

I'm totally on board with the notion that there is a broad range of
ride qualities that no one bike can provide, and I think you are spot
on with tubing dimensions.  I think what you'd need is a bike with a
couple dials on the handlebars that can adjust the diameter and wall
thickness of your frame tubing.  Build me a bike with that feature,
and that bike could 'do it all' for me.

On Sep 1, 9:03 am, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:43 AM, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:
  OK, I'll play:

  one bike can't do it all - I've tried. 

  define can't.

 Well parried. I mean, in my own case, I *do* want at least one, light,
 fast as possible road bike with all the qualities of top road bike
 handling -- and this is what rules out a heavier, heavier wheeled,
 slower handling bike -- can't speak of the Bombadil since I've not
 ridden it, but it certainly rules out the Sam Hill.

 I know what you mean; I tried it myself once, but gave up -- too much
 compromise between -- in my case -- ability to negotiate sandy soil
 and fast road type handling and feel. Each to his own, I guess. But I
 do maintain that it is not possible for me.

 With a Bombadil and maybe 4 sets of tires and maybe 3



  handlebar/cockpit setups, I'd argue that there is no ride under the
  big umbrella of it all' that this theoretical one bike can't do.
  In order to say that it can't, I think you'd have to bring in
  qualitative stuff like my Bombadil with road tires and drop bars can't
  be 23 lbs.  Or that a moderate fitness level person can't keep up with
  similarly fit riders on MRCBs.  Or that nobody could win the Tuesday
  night Crit on it.

  Don't get me wrong, I'm the last person in the world that would try to
  get by with one bike, but if I did want to live in a studio apartment
  and have only one bike, I bet I could have something that could cover
  everything I wanted to do on a bike, and that there would be nothing
  that I wanted to do on a bike that could not be done on that one
  bike.

  On Aug 31, 6:26 pm, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:
  Define enough.

  On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Pondero cj.spin...@gmail.com wrote:
   ...but can one bike do enough?

   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
   Groups RBW Owners Bunch group.
   To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
   rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit this group 
   athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

  --
  Patrick Moore
  Albuquerque, NM
  For professional resumes, contact
  Patrick Moore, ACRW at resumespecialt...@gmail.com

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
  RBW Owners Bunch group.
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
  rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group 
  athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

 --
 Patrick Moore
 Albuquerque, NM
 For professional resumes, contact
 Patrick Moore, ACRW at resumespecialt...@gmail.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread doug peterson
Another side of the question is whether or not you demand the the
ultimate in performance for various types of riding.  If you intend to
go on the weekly racers training ride on Thurs and rock hopping on
Saturday, you need a couple of very different bicycles.  OTH, if you
like friendly pavement rides, S24Os, some hiking trails and fire
roads, pretty much anything Riv makes can handle those.  I've portaged
my Atlantis across some rock falls that may have been passable on a
double suspended MTB (not by me, mind you!) and chased some fast guys
(downhill works best).  It's obviously less than ideal for those
situations, but not so much as to create serious bike lust.  FWIW, as
much as I love my Atlantis, I'll venture a Bomba or Hunqa, set up the
same way, would perform just as well.

dougP


On Sep 1, 5:23 am, Pondero cj.spin...@gmail.com wrote:
 Enough, as I imagined it, would be sufficient for a given person.  In
 other words, might it possible that someone might have a sufficiently
 narrow use range, so that one versatile bike could satisfy?

 Yeah, you're right, probably not.  Not if that someone really likes
 bicycles.

 On Aug 31, 8:26 pm, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:



  Define enough.- Hide quoted text -

 - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread Philip Williamson
I'm with Joel on the competitive riding. Sometimes I feel like I
should care, but I just don't. I kind of wish I'd been the one to call
Alberto Contador that tri guy.

I have three bikes, and would be happy with just the Quickbeam. If it
was my only bike, I wouldn't switch out the cockpit, since it's
perfectly dialed, but I'd change the tires and remove the fenders
sometimes. I'd also figure out an easy way to remove the dynamo
lighting. When I bought it, I really wanted the ability to run fatter
tires, but 40mm is plenty for what I ever do. I've ridden the QB on
everything I ride my mountain bike on.

With 28mm tires, the bike feels fast, and light 25s, more so. I don't
see ever running 25s again, though.
I would probably end up with a few wheels.

 Philip


On Sep 1, 8:20 am, JoelMatthews joelmatth...@mac.com wrote:
  define can't.  With a Bombadil and maybe 4 sets of tires and maybe 3
  handlebar/cockpit setups, I'd argue that there is no ride under the
  big umbrella of it all' that this theoretical one bike can't do.
  In order to say that it can't, I think you'd have to bring in
  qualitative stuff like my Bombadil with road tires and drop bars can't
  be 23 lbs.  Or that a moderate fitness level person can't keep up with
  similarly fit riders on MRCBs.  Or that nobody could win the Tuesday
  night Crit on it.

 Not so much the competition stuff - I could care less about organized
 amateur (or pro for that matter) riding.  But rather the certain
 magical ride quality a bike made with thin wall tubing, be it 531,
 Columbia SL or the modern equivalents the Bomb could never match.

 If the Bomb owner does not care about this admittedly subjective
 pleasure, than maybe the Bomb is the only bike needed.

 For me if I were to have only one bike it would probably be a Hilsen.
 Maybe 650b so I could use real fat tires for off/rough road.

 On Sep 1, 9:43 am, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote:



  OK, I'll play:

  one bike can't do it all - I've tried. 

  define can't.  With a Bombadil and maybe 4 sets of tires and maybe 3
  handlebar/cockpit setups, I'd argue that there is no ride under the
  big umbrella of it all' that this theoretical one bike can't do.
  In order to say that it can't, I think you'd have to bring in
  qualitative stuff like my Bombadil with road tires and drop bars can't
  be 23 lbs.  Or that a moderate fitness level person can't keep up with
  similarly fit riders on MRCBs.  Or that nobody could win the Tuesday
  night Crit on it.

  Don't get me wrong, I'm the last person in the world that would try to
  get by with one bike, but if I did want to live in a studio apartment
  and have only one bike, I bet I could have something that could cover
  everything I wanted to do on a bike, and that there would be nothing
  that I wanted to do on a bike that could not be done on that one
  bike.

  On Aug 31, 6:26 pm, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:

   Define enough.

   On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Pondero cj.spin...@gmail.com wrote:
...but can one bike do enough?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups RBW Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group 
athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

   --
   Patrick Moore
   Albuquerque, NM
   For professional resumes, contact
   Patrick Moore, ACRW at resumespecialt...@gmail.com- Hide quoted text -

  - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread Bill Connell
I'm down to a nearly all-time low of 3 bikes. What i've figured out
with the single bike notion is that, for me, the goal of having one
bike isn't worth the hassle of changing that bike for different uses.
I do switch my 'cross bike from commuter to racer and back once a
year, but i get tired of swapping out wheels and bags and whatnot just
for a weekend of dirt riding. Likewise, i rode many years on a MB4 and
got tired of the way it handled on the road with slicks.

I'm not a racer or extreme rider by any means, but i do enjoy tools
that are reasonably well-suited to the job, and my riding is diverse
enough that i have a hard time getting below 2-3 bikes.


On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:26 PM, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:
 Define enough.

 On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Pondero cj.spin...@gmail.com wrote:
 ...but can one bike do enough?


-- 
Bill Connell
St. Paul, MN

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread EricP
Well, I'm at 4 (or 3 1/2 since one is a folder).  And to be quite
honest, three are somewhat overlapping.  Yes, I could maybe, possibly,
get by with one bike (my Sam Hillborne).  But then I'd feel guilty
riding it through the slush/ice/snow of winter knowing the frame will
probably rot in about 5 or 6 years due to inattentive maintenance.
Right there, need a winter beater.

Then riding a poorly maintained rail-trail a week or so ago on the
Hillborne, realized that a bike that takes wider than 40s would be
more appropriate for that task.  Again, another bike.

So, while something like a Hunqapillar could, in theory, work as an
only, too many other variables intervene.  Not the least of which is
my history of collecting/hoarding stuff.

Then again, while in college, did only have one bike.  A Specialized
Stumpjumper.  So have done it.  Just not positive I'd want to go that
route again.

BTW, I'm in the opposite camp on racing.  Do have some interest in the
pros, but no interest whatsoever in a gofast type of bike.  My
riding style is just entirely wrong for it.

On Sep 1, 4:56 pm, Bill Connell bconn...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'm down to a nearly all-time low of 3 bikes. What i've figured out
 with the single bike notion is that, for me, the goal of having one
 bike isn't worth the hassle of changing that bike for different uses.
 I do switch my 'cross bike from commuter to racer and back once a
 year, but i get tired of swapping out wheels and bags and whatnot just
 for a weekend of dirt riding. Likewise, i rode many years on a MB4 and
 got tired of the way it handled on the road with slicks.

 I'm not a racer or extreme rider by any means, but i do enjoy tools
 that are reasonably well-suited to the job, and my riding is diverse
 enough that i have a hard time getting below 2-3 bikes.

 On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:26 PM, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:
  Define enough.

  On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Pondero cj.spin...@gmail.com wrote:
  ...but can one bike do enough?

 --
 Bill Connell
 St. Paul, MN

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-09-01 Thread PATRICK MOORE
The Powers that Be have just cut the statutory minimum number of
bicycles from five to four: gofast; gofast commuter (just first gofast
but with fenders, lights, rack); beater that is as close to the second
gofast as possible but much cheaper so that you actually enjoy riding
it to Costco or Albertsons but, if it were stolen, you would week only
briefly. Next, off road bike; and, I had added tourer. But I am
hoping that the Fargo will coalesce the last two into a unity with two
separate wheelsets.

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:45 PM, EricP ericpl...@aol.com wrote:
 Well, I'm at 4 (or 3 1/2 since one is a folder).  And to be quite
 honest, three are somewhat overlapping.  Yes, I could maybe, possibly,
 get by with one bike (my Sam Hillborne).  But then I'd feel guilty
 riding it through the slush/ice/snow of winter knowing the frame will
 probably rot in about 5 or 6 years due to inattentive maintenance.
 Right there, need a winter beater.

 Then riding a poorly maintained rail-trail a week or so ago on the
 Hillborne, realized that a bike that takes wider than 40s would be
 more appropriate for that task.  Again, another bike.

 So, while something like a Hunqapillar could, in theory, work as an
 only, too many other variables intervene.  Not the least of which is
 my history of collecting/hoarding stuff.

 Then again, while in college, did only have one bike.  A Specialized
 Stumpjumper.  So have done it.  Just not positive I'd want to go that
 route again.

 BTW, I'm in the opposite camp on racing.  Do have some interest in the
 pros, but no interest whatsoever in a gofast type of bike.  My
 riding style is just entirely wrong for it.

 On Sep 1, 4:56 pm, Bill Connell bconn...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'm down to a nearly all-time low of 3 bikes. What i've figured out
 with the single bike notion is that, for me, the goal of having one
 bike isn't worth the hassle of changing that bike for different uses.
 I do switch my 'cross bike from commuter to racer and back once a
 year, but i get tired of swapping out wheels and bags and whatnot just
 for a weekend of dirt riding. Likewise, i rode many years on a MB4 and
 got tired of the way it handled on the road with slicks.

 I'm not a racer or extreme rider by any means, but i do enjoy tools
 that are reasonably well-suited to the job, and my riding is diverse
 enough that i have a hard time getting below 2-3 bikes.

 On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:26 PM, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:
  Define enough.

  On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Pondero cj.spin...@gmail.com wrote:
  ...but can one bike do enough?

 --
 Bill Connell
 St. Paul, MN

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.





-- 
Patrick Moore
Albuquerque, NM
For professional resumes, contact
Patrick Moore, ACRW at resumespecialt...@gmail.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-08-31 Thread Pondero
...but can one bike do enough?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-08-31 Thread PATRICK MOORE
Define enough.

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Pondero cj.spin...@gmail.com wrote:
 ...but can one bike do enough?

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.





-- 
Patrick Moore
Albuquerque, NM
For professional resumes, contact
Patrick Moore, ACRW at resumespecialt...@gmail.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-08-31 Thread Montclair BobbyB
Patrick:

Seeing how Rene S had his Bombadil set up (with such a wide variety of
configurations) is what ultimately drew me to this bike.  When I get
my hands on it, I'm going to try setting it up with 2 basic
configurations:  as roadish as I can, and as beastly (ie fat-tired
monster bike) as I can.  I've attempted this with other bikes
(including a Salsa Ala Carte, which was alot of fun), but somehow I
think the Bombadil can stretch the limit in both directions... we
shall see... h.

BB

On Aug 31, 8:05 pm, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:
 There is a huge difference between a bike that can roll over things
 with 60 mm Big Apples at sub-20 psi and a light, nimble Riv Road-type
 bike. Climbing, particularly, is different, but cornering and handling
 generally is also very different with light, narrower wheels. I love
 both kinds; one bike can't do it all - I've tried.





 On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Kip Otteson kip.otte...@gmail.com wrote:
  I love my Bombadil's versatility.  I don't know how a do-all bike
  should feel but this one can ride the trails and the street
  seamlessly.  I don't think I'll be hucking rock gardens as I did with
  the knobbies and no fenders, but this setup still will allow me to
  ride some reasonable dirt.  I really like how the Schwalbe Fatties are
  rolling along.  However, they are very heavy!  I feel like this bike
  is a green Hummer type thing.  Just what I wanted.

  On a side note...am I missing a bunch by not having a more roadish
  Riv?

 http://www.flickr.com/photos/25150...@n08/4935360348/

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
  RBW Owners Bunch group.
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
  rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group 
  athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

 --
 Patrick Moore
 Albuquerque, NM
 For professional resumes, contact
 Patrick Moore, ACRW at resumespecialt...@gmail.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: In praise of versatility

2010-08-31 Thread RJM
Nice bike.

I have pondered which first riv to get and the Bombadil makes the top
two everytime.  I know exactly the setup I want for it if I choose the
Bomba, just don't know if it will beat out the Atlantis that I have
built in my head as my first Riv.

On Aug 31, 6:56 pm, Kip Otteson kip.otte...@gmail.com wrote:
 I love my Bombadil's versatility.  I don't know how a do-all bike
 should feel but this one can ride the trails and the street
 seamlessly.  I don't think I'll be hucking rock gardens as I did with
 the knobbies and no fenders, but this setup still will allow me to
 ride some reasonable dirt.  I really like how the Schwalbe Fatties are
 rolling along.  However, they are very heavy!  I feel like this bike
 is a green Hummer type thing.  Just what I wanted.

 On a side note...am I missing a bunch by not having a more roadish
 Riv?

 http://www.flickr.com/photos/25150...@n08/4935360348/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.