[RBW] Re: Tektro CR720 w/Marks Rack Conflicting

2010-08-11 Thread William
When I thought about a Mark's rack on the front of my Bombadil,
Rivendell recommended against it (Dave).  Dave told me to only use the
Marks Rack if I absolutely have to.  If you can use the Mini front, on
any bike, absolutely that rack wins, he said.

Those lower struts are load bearing.  On the Mini front, they are
bent, but they are also tubular steel.  Bend the Marks Rack aluminum
struts and they will be much weaker than if they stayed straight.  On
the Mini Front, the joints are welded, not bolted together, also much
stronger.  If it's just going to be a handlebar support it might be
fine.  If it's going to get a platrack bolted to it with 25lbs of
stuff, or a big wald basket and a case of beer, I would worry about
the strength if the struts are bent.

Dave told me the top of the fork crown bolts on my Bombadil are
intended to enable me to run a big rear rack on the front, not to run
a Marks Rack.

On Aug 10, 4:37 am, Garth garth...@gmail.com wrote:
 I've used these brakes for a few rides now. They work well, but they
 shed brake material like I've never seen. My rims are coated with
 black brake dust from 2 rides. These pads won't last long.

 I think I'll try some SwissStop Black pads or VO's squeal free ones.
 Anyone use either?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Tektro CR720 w/Marks Rack Conflicting

2010-08-10 Thread Garth

I've used these brakes for a few rides now. They work well, but they
shed brake material like I've never seen. My rims are coated with
black brake dust from 2 rides. These pads won't last long.

I think I'll try some SwissStop Black pads or VO's squeal free ones.
Anyone use either?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Tektro CR720 w/Marks Rack Conflicting

2010-08-08 Thread Garth
Thanks for bending tips Angus, they're really helpful.

Thomas   your idea has me thinking . I'm going to try cutting
some strips of clear chainstay protector and put those inside the fork
blades where it hits. My paint is Dupont Imron, so it does chip and
all , sometimes easier than one would like. But, all my bikes are
missing paint all over the place so I really shouldn't worry about it.
I'm a sucker for Imron metallic paints!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Tektro CR720 w/Marks Rack Conflicting

2010-08-07 Thread Angus
Garth,

Without pictures I may be visualizing this incorrectly...but, (as
Robert pointed out) can you bend the lower stays in a manner similar
to the mini-front rack to allow the cantilevers to open wider?

Part of the fun  frustration of assembling a unique bicycle is making
everything work together.  If it were easy, everyone would do it!

Angus

On Aug 6, 3:49 pm, Garth garth...@gmail.com wrote:
 When installing some CR720's today on the Bombadil, I found out they
 conflict big time with a Marks front rack, mounted at the braze-ons
 below the canti bosses.  This is not good. When installed, the brakes
 cannot open to get the tire out, they hit the struts of the Nitto. Is
 this a secret that I was not aware of?

 What to do?  I don't know.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Tektro CR720 w/Marks Rack Conflicting

2010-08-07 Thread Garth


On Aug 7, 7:17 am, Angus angusle...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
 Garth,

 Without pictures I may be visualizing this incorrectly...but, (as
 Robert pointed out) can you bend the lower stays in a manner similar
 to the mini-front rack to allow the cantilevers to open wider?

 Part of the fun  frustration of assembling a unique bicycle is making
 everything work together.  If it were easy, everyone would do it!

 Angus


  Yes . it's like a jigsaw puzzle!

I though of bending the struts, but at room temperature I don't think
they are that bendable. If they were heated however . I bet they'd
bend to shape easily. I have zero experience with a torch though, and
the struts would need to be longer than they are.  If I get longer
ones ,I may as well mount them mid low on the those braze-ons.



I do ponder an open question though , if Mark's rack was not intended
for canti's, why does the Bombadil have the threaded holes on top of
the fork for it? These work perfectly for that rack.  I guess the
answer is it works with *some* cantilevers, but not the super wide
ones like Frogglegs or CR720. The vintage wide BR-MC70 I have on there
now in the front fits fine because the triangle sticks out higher than
on the CR720, as seen here. 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11316...@n04/4860392084/
. The BR-MC70 was taken from another bike to fit he Bombadil, as
my Plan 1 was to use XC Pro canti's, but their low profile had meager
stopping power on this frame due to it's large clearances, the yoke
angles were poor. The rear brake is a well used Shimano BR-MT62 I
found on ebay , as the BR-MC70 didn't work there as it binded on the
canti post. These were meant to be temporary brakes until I could find
some new ones but they may need to stay permanently.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Tektro CR720 w/Marks Rack Conflicting

2010-08-07 Thread rperks
somewhere on youtube is a video of Mark at riv bending them with a
hammer and vise, you do not need to heat them, just do it like you
mean it.  The vise holds them at the same time and orientation for a
syncronised bend.  Call riv and talk to mark or one of the guys for
moral support, they may even have a bent and cut set to solve this, as
they sell the bike rack and model of brakes.

Rob

On Aug 7, 5:43 am, Garth garth...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Aug 7, 7:17 am, Angus angusle...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

  Garth,

  Without pictures I may be visualizing this incorrectly...but, (as
  Robert pointed out) can you bend the lower stays in a manner similar
  to the mini-front rack to allow the cantilevers to open wider?

  Part of the fun  frustration of assembling a unique bicycle is making
  everything work together.  If it were easy, everyone would do it!

  Angus

   Yes . it's like a jigsaw puzzle!

 I though of bending the struts, but at room temperature I don't think
 they are that bendable. If they were heated however . I bet they'd
 bend to shape easily. I have zero experience with a torch though, and
 the struts would need to be longer than they are.  If I get longer
 ones ,I may as well mount them mid low on the those braze-ons.

 I do ponder an open question though , if Mark's rack was not intended
 for canti's, why does the Bombadil have the threaded holes on top of
 the fork for it? These work perfectly for that rack.  I guess the
 answer is it works with *some* cantilevers, but not the super wide
 ones like Frogglegs or CR720. The vintage wide BR-MC70 I have on there
 now in the front fits fine because the triangle sticks out higher than
 on the CR720, as seen 
 here.http://www.flickr.com/photos/11316...@n04/4860392084/
 . The BR-MC70 was taken from another bike to fit he Bombadil, as
 my Plan 1 was to use XC Pro canti's, but their low profile had meager
 stopping power on this frame due to it's large clearances, the yoke
 angles were poor. The rear brake is a well used Shimano BR-MT62 I
 found on ebay , as the BR-MC70 didn't work there as it binded on the
 canti post. These were meant to be temporary brakes until I could find
 some new ones but they may need to stay permanently.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Tektro CR720 w/Marks Rack Conflicting

2010-08-07 Thread J. Burkhalter
here's the link to Mark bending struts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65yQS1AuAfc

-Jay

On Aug 7, 8:01 am, rperks perks@gmail.com wrote:
 somewhere on youtube is a video of Mark at riv bending them with a
 hammer and vise, you do not need to heat them, just do it like you
 mean it.  The vise holds them at the same time and orientation for a
 syncronised bend.  Call riv and talk to mark or one of the guys for
 moral support, they may even have a bent and cut set to solve this, as
 they sell the bike rack and model of brakes.

 Rob

 On Aug 7, 5:43 am, Garth garth...@gmail.com wrote:



  On Aug 7, 7:17 am, Angus angusle...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

   Garth,

   Without pictures I may be visualizing this incorrectly...but, (as
   Robert pointed out) can you bend the lower stays in a manner similar
   to the mini-front rack to allow the cantilevers to open wider?

   Part of the fun  frustration of assembling a unique bicycle is making
   everything work together.  If it were easy, everyone would do it!

   Angus

    Yes . it's like a jigsaw puzzle!

  I though of bending the struts, but at room temperature I don't think
  they are that bendable. If they were heated however . I bet they'd
  bend to shape easily. I have zero experience with a torch though, and
  the struts would need to be longer than they are.  If I get longer
  ones ,I may as well mount them mid low on the those braze-ons.

  I do ponder an open question though , if Mark's rack was not intended
  for canti's, why does the Bombadil have the threaded holes on top of
  the fork for it? These work perfectly for that rack.  I guess the
  answer is it works with *some* cantilevers, but not the super wide
  ones like Frogglegs or CR720. The vintage wide BR-MC70 I have on there
  now in the front fits fine because the triangle sticks out higher than
  on the CR720, as seen 
  here.http://www.flickr.com/photos/11316...@n04/4860392084/
  . The BR-MC70 was taken from another bike to fit he Bombadil, as
  my Plan 1 was to use XC Pro canti's, but their low profile had meager
  stopping power on this frame due to it's large clearances, the yoke
  angles were poor. The rear brake is a well used Shimano BR-MT62 I
  found on ebay , as the BR-MC70 didn't work there as it binded on the
  canti post. These were meant to be temporary brakes until I could find
  some new ones but they may need to stay permanently.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Tektro CR720 w/Marks Rack Conflicting

2010-08-07 Thread Garth

Hey guys, thanks for the help.   After a ride to clear my head and
watching the video, I reconfigured and lowered the rack, with a little
bending of the struts, and everything just fits!

I do have one more question though, regarding the pad holders hitting
the fork blades the front , which is new to me as I've always used
small enough pads that they never hit the fork blades.

What do you do if you have wider tires than you have clearance between
the pads?  I have 50.5mm there on the Bombadil. I have a set of
Michelin 2 tires that I may use in the future. Just squeeze it
through?

Anyone using larger than 2 tires on a Bombadil or Atlantis must have
come across this.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Tektro CR720 w/Marks Rack Conflicting

2010-08-07 Thread Garth

After getting the CR720 on the front, I notice they I have to put the
hanger quite a bit off center for it to pull evenly. The spring adjust
screws help a little ,but not enough. My previous brakes had no spring
adjustment and the pull was dead straight.

Any ideas would be appreciated.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Tektro CR720 w/Marks Rack Conflicting

2010-08-07 Thread Angus
To add a radius to the bend you can bend them over a dowel/wood broom
handle.  I do it in the vise ala the video except with a dowel in
there too.

I don't think it would be a problem in this case, but aluminum doesn't
like sharp corners too much.

Angus

On Aug 7, 9:31 am, J. Burkhalter burk...@yahoo.com wrote:
 here's the link to Mark bending struts

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65yQS1AuAfc

 -Jay

 On Aug 7, 8:01 am, rperks perks@gmail.com wrote:

  somewhere on youtube is a video of Mark at riv bending them with a
  hammer and vise, you do not need to heat them, just do it like you
  mean it.  The vise holds them at the same time and orientation for a
  syncronised bend.  Call riv and talk to mark or one of the guys for
  moral support, they may even have a bent and cut set to solve this, as
  they sell the bike rack and model of brakes.

  Rob

  On Aug 7, 5:43 am, Garth garth...@gmail.com wrote:

   On Aug 7, 7:17 am, Angus angusle...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

Garth,

Without pictures I may be visualizing this incorrectly...but, (as
Robert pointed out) can you bend the lower stays in a manner similar
to the mini-front rack to allow the cantilevers to open wider?

Part of the fun  frustration of assembling a unique bicycle is making
everything work together.  If it were easy, everyone would do it!

Angus

     Yes . it's like a jigsaw puzzle!

   I though of bending the struts, but at room temperature I don't think
   they are that bendable. If they were heated however . I bet they'd
   bend to shape easily. I have zero experience with a torch though, and
   the struts would need to be longer than they are.  If I get longer
   ones ,I may as well mount them mid low on the those braze-ons.

   I do ponder an open question though , if Mark's rack was not intended
   for canti's, why does the Bombadil have the threaded holes on top of
   the fork for it? These work perfectly for that rack.  I guess the
   answer is it works with *some* cantilevers, but not the super wide
   ones like Frogglegs or CR720. The vintage wide BR-MC70 I have on there
   now in the front fits fine because the triangle sticks out higher than
   on the CR720, as seen 
   here.http://www.flickr.com/photos/11316...@n04/4860392084/
   . The BR-MC70 was taken from another bike to fit he Bombadil, as
   my Plan 1 was to use XC Pro canti's, but their low profile had meager
   stopping power on this frame due to it's large clearances, the yoke
   angles were poor. The rear brake is a well used Shimano BR-MT62 I
   found on ebay , as the BR-MC70 didn't work there as it binded on the
   canti post. These were meant to be temporary brakes until I could find
   some new ones but they may need to stay permanently.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Tektro CR720 w/Marks Rack Conflicting

2010-08-06 Thread Ginz
Yeah, that sounds like one of those incompatibilities you only come
across through personal experience.  You could try some lower-profile
brakes or the Nitto M12 rack.



On Aug 6, 4:49 pm, Garth garth...@gmail.com wrote:
 When installing some CR720's today on the Bombadil, I found out they
 conflict big time with a Marks front rack, mounted at the braze-ons
 below the canti bosses.  This is not good. When installed, the brakes
 cannot open to get the tire out, they hit the struts of the Nitto. Is
 this a secret that I was not aware of?

 What to do?  I don't know.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Tektro CR720 w/Marks Rack Conflicting

2010-08-06 Thread Aaron Young
I couldn't get the Mark's Rack to work on the front of my bike with the
CR720 cantis either.  I ended up putting it on the rear and it fits just
fine (although it is a bit short compared to most rear racks).

Aaron Young
Rochester, NY




On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Ginz theg...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yeah, that sounds like one of those incompatibilities you only come
 across through personal experience.  You could try some lower-profile
 brakes or the Nitto M12 rack.



 On Aug 6, 4:49 pm, Garth garth...@gmail.com wrote:
  When installing some CR720's today on the Bombadil, I found out they
  conflict big time with a Marks front rack, mounted at the braze-ons
  below the canti bosses.  This is not good. When installed, the brakes
  cannot open to get the tire out, they hit the struts of the Nitto. Is
  this a secret that I was not aware of?
 
  What to do?  I don't know.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comrbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Tektro CR720 w/Marks Rack Conflicting

2010-08-06 Thread Garth
Thanks for that Bob.

It seems my choice is a new rack or some extra long struts mounted to
the mid low braze-ons instead of below the canti's. Riv is out of the
long struts though.

I guess I can mount the Nitto 2 strut rack in the front either.
Gheese.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Tektro CR720 w/Marks Rack Conflicting

2010-08-06 Thread Garth
Thanks for that Bob and Aaron.

It seems my choice is a new rack or some extra long struts mounted to
the mid low braze-ons instead of below the canti's. Riv is out of the
long struts though.

Or in the back. I already tried that, though I preferred it up front.

I guess I can mount the Nitto 2 strut rack in the front either.
Gheese. My best laid planes have gone to h-e double toothpicks
multiple times with this bike.

So much for plans!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Tektro CR720 w/Marks Rack Conflicting

2010-08-06 Thread Garth
Really though .. this is the third brake I've tried using on the
Bombadil. I was hoping to use one paired set. Right now I have a mixed
set of vintage Shimano canti's on there.  The canti bosses are
irregular in depth, so some brakes bind when tightened on the rear.
Darn quirks. Sigh .

 I would like to use the CR720's , as I waited a long time for
polished silver ones. They've upgraded their pads to 55mm road/cross
sized and nice holders, not the 72mm pin type they had. Pads and
holders are # 720.12  http://www.tektro.com/02products/pads.php


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.