[regext] Interim Meeting Invite

[Roger D Carney]

Good Afternoon,

I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Wednesday August 23 at 
15:00 UTC for 60 minutes.

As you may have seen I have recently published new versions of the Fee draft, 
draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-06 and of the Validate draft 
draft-ietf-regext-validate-02.

Agenda

  1.  Fee
 *   Confirm Edits (scheme, section 3.8 and reference)
 *   Discuss "Quiet Period": section 3.8 paragraph 5
 *   Discuss WG Last Call
  2.  Validate
 *   Re-introduce
 *   Comments/Questions

We will once again use Zoom as a conferencing tool, please use this 
link to connect to the meeting.


Thanks
Roger

___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

[regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-06.txt

[internet-drafts]

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions WG of the 
IETF.

Title   : Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible 
Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
Authors : Roger Carney
  Gavin Brown
  Jothan Frakes
Filename: draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-06.txt
Pages   : 35
Date: 2017-08-03

Abstract:
   This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
   extension mapping for registry fees.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-06
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-06

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-06


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] TLD Phase Discovery

[Patrick Mevzek]

Gould, James  2017-08-03 18:13
> I believe TLD level EPP policies is relevant, but is best suited for 
> something outside of the Launch Phase or Registry Fee command-response 
> extensions.   An example policy EPP mapping is the Registry Mapping 
> (https://www.verisign.com/assets/epp-sdk/verisign_epp-extension_registry_v00.html)
>  that does provide launch phase schedule information at the TLD (zone) level. 
>  Something like the Registry Mapping with extensions to define the features 
> and policies of EPP extensions like the Launch Phase or Registry Fee 
> extensions is best suited for defining and discovering the features and 
> policies.

I agree with Roger that auto-discovery should be a problem to be
tackled and replied with solutions. For TLD phases but also for a lot
of other "knobs" and options in EPP.

And I totally agree with James on the Registry Mapping extension, that
could be suited for this task.

I would even be very happy if VeriSign
could push forward to make this EPP extension a standard, to be used
by many registries.

-- 
Patrick Mevzek

___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] TLD Phase Discovery

[Gould, James]

Roger,

I believe TLD level EPP policies is relevant, but is best suited for something 
outside of the Launch Phase or Registry Fee command-response extensions.   An 
example policy EPP mapping is the Registry Mapping 
(https://www.verisign.com/assets/epp-sdk/verisign_epp-extension_registry_v00.html)
 that does provide launch phase schedule information at the TLD (zone) level.  
Something like the Registry Mapping with extensions to define the features and 
policies of EPP extensions like the Launch Phase or Registry Fee extensions is 
best suited for defining and discovering the features and policies.

—

JG

[id:image001.png@01D255E2.EB933A30]

James Gould
Distinguished Engineer
jgo...@verisign.com

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

Verisign.com

From: regext  on behalf of Roger Carney 

Date: Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 12:03 PM
To: "regext@ietf.org" 
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] TLD Phase Discovery

Good Morning,

Coming out of Prague I mentioned that I would post to the list the idea of a 
Launch Phase Mapping/List feature. I believe the thought was to come up with 
some way to query the registry for a list of phases and associated dates for a 
TLD.

Are there any thoughts on where/how this might be best implemented? Or more 
importantly if such a feature is even needed? I feel that it is needed.


Thanks
Roger

___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext