[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting 2018DEC19

[Roger D Carney]

Good Morning,


I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Wednesday December 19th 
at 15:00 UTC for 60 minutes.



We plan to focus the discussion around Reporting and if time allows a 
discussion on the Validate draft.



Agenda

  1.  Reporting 
Repository/Structure/Reports
 and
  2.  Validate draft (updates from last interim and Bangkok)



We will once again use Zoom as a conferencing tool, please use this 
link to connect to the meeting.



Please reply to the list or directly to myself if you plan on attending this 
meeting.



Thanks
Roger

___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-org-ext-10: (with COMMENT)

[Hollenbeck, Scott]

> -Original Message-
> From: regext  On Behalf Of Benjamin Kaduk
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 10:07 PM
> To: The IESG 
> Cc: regext-cha...@ietf.org; pieter.vandepi...@dnsbelgium.be;
> regext@ietf.org; draft-ietf-regext-org-...@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-
> regext-org-ext-10: (with COMMENT)
>
> Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-regext-org-ext-10: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-org-ext/
>
>
>
> --
> COMMENT:
> --
>
> Thank you for addressing my Discuss points!
>
> [Original Comment section preserved below]
>
> Section 1
>
>In the business model of domain registration, we usually have 3 roles
>of entities: a registrant, a registrar and a registry.  There may be
>other roles of entities involved in the domain registration process
>which are not formally defined, such as resellers, DNS service
>operators, privacy proxies, etc.
>
> nit: Perhaps I am misreading, but are we not going to formally define
> these entities in the next paragraph (in which case "yet" might be worth
> adding)?

If definitions are needed, it may make sense to cite those described in 
draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis. The Datatracker says it's in the RFC Editor's 
AUTH48 state, so it should be available as an RFC in a matter of days.

Scott

___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext