reiser4 grub patch
Hi, i have a big trouble with the grub with reiser4 patch. Look here: ./install.sh: grub root (hd0,0) Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83 grub setup (hd0) Checking if /boot/grub/stage1 exists... yes Checking if /boot/grub/stage2 exists... yes Checking if /boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5 exists... yes Running embed /boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5 (hd0)... 15 sectors are embedded. succeeded Running install /boot/grub/stage1 (hd0) (hd0)1+15 p (hd0,0)/boot/grub/stage /boot/grub/menu.lst... failed should be stage2 ^^ without reiser4 patch works perfectly -- luc Linux 2.6.12-15mdk-i686-up-4GB Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 2.00GHz
Re: vs-4080
On Fri 20 Jan 2006 13:02, Raymond A. Meijer wrote: ReiserFS: dm-8: warning: vs-4080: reiserfs_free_block: free_block (dm-8:46707368)[dev:blocknr]: bit already cleared It would be interesting to check the filesystem after a week of regular load to see whether new such corruptions appeared. No problems so far: reiserfsck --fix-fixable started at Fri Jan 20 12:08:21 2006 [...] reiserfsck finished at Fri Jan 20 12:30:05 2006 Still no problems: reiserfsck --fix-fixable started at Fri Feb 3 13:14:52 2006 ### Replaying journal.. Reiserfs journal '/dev/debian/mirror' in blocks [18..8211]: 0 transactions replayed Checking internal tree..finished Comparing bitmaps..finished Checking Semantic tree: finished No corruptions found There are on the filesystem: Leaves 121472 Internal nodes 820 Directories 36818 Other files 581476 Data block pointers 68825551 (0 of them are zero) Safe links 0 ### reiserfsck finished at Fri Feb 3 13:37:21 2006 Ray
Re: reiser4 grub patch
On Friday 03 February 2006 14:37, luc wrote: Hi, i have a big trouble with the grub with reiser4 patch. Look here: ./install.sh: grub root (hd0,0) ═Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83 grub setup (hd0) ═Checking if /boot/grub/stage1 exists... yes ═Checking if /boot/grub/stage2 exists... yes ═Checking if /boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5 exists... yes ═Running embed /boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5 (hd0)... ═15 sectors are embedded. succeeded ═Running install /boot/grub/stage1 (hd0) (hd0)1+15 p (hd0,0)/boot/grub/stage /boot/grub/menu.lst... failed ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ ═ should be stage2 ═^^ without reiser4 patch works perfectly is it grub 0.97? have you taken the patched grub from our ftp or patched it by yourself? have you installed the grub or testing it all in the source dir? do not forget that new fs images should be put into /boot/grub/, otherwise you are trying old images with new grub. reiser4 fs seems to be not involved into that installation process, am I correct that an fs grub source sits on, /, (hd0,0), other used fs are not reiser4 ones? which files do you have in (hd0,0)/boot/grub/? -- Vitaly
Reiser4 on powerpc; unresolved symbol, panic
Hi, Seing that reiser4 was pretty much stable on my i386 workstation, I decided to give it a try on my iBook 2001 dual-usb. While compiling the new kernel for my laptop (2.6.15 + debian, reiser4 patched, built-in), it gave new_page as an unresolved symbol in fs/reiser4/plugin/item/tail.c . By looking at the context of the file, I changed new_page for page. With that, I was able to start rsyncing my system back on the laptop (using a rescue partition, with the same kernel). Unfortunately, about halfway through, it gave a pretty ugly panic; the dmesg output is attached. Running 'sync' or 'umount' on the filesystem resulted in that userspace program to stop responding completely. After a reboot, a fsck on the reiser4 filesystem resulted in total anhilation (thousands of files in lost+found, none in the rest of the filesystem). Hopefully, I have good backup habits (my workstation is backed up twice a week in case of reiser4 snafu), no data was lost, so I wont be suing namesys ;P. Thanks for the great filesystem, Keep up the great work, Jonathan crash Description: /
Re: Reiser4 on powerpc; unresolved symbol, panic
I tried the same change with the 2.6.15-1 patch on my beige g3 and got a hard lock attempting to mount a reiser4 filesystem and no messages logged. The previous behavior has been for reiser4 filesystems, even created on a working architecture, to gracefully fail to mount. I don't think Namesys is prioritizing PPC support yet, which is understandable. On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 09:17 -0500, Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault wrote: Hi, Seing that reiser4 was pretty much stable on my i386 workstation, I decided to give it a try on my iBook 2001 dual-usb. While compiling the new kernel for my laptop (2.6.15 + debian, reiser4 patched, built-in), it gave new_page as an unresolved symbol in fs/reiser4/plugin/item/tail.c . By looking at the context of the file, I changed new_page for page. With that, I was able to start rsyncing my system back on the laptop (using a rescue partition, with the same kernel). Unfortunately, about halfway through, it gave a pretty ugly panic; the dmesg output is attached. Running 'sync' or 'umount' on the filesystem resulted in that userspace program to stop responding completely. After a reboot, a fsck on the reiser4 filesystem resulted in total anhilation (thousands of files in lost+found, none in the rest of the filesystem). Hopefully, I have good backup habits (my workstation is backed up twice a week in case of reiser4 snafu), no data was lost, so I wont be suing namesys ;P. Thanks for the great filesystem, Keep up the great work, Jonathan -- Jake Maciejewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Small ZFS / Reiser4 / Ext 'benchmark'
Hans, I am surprised that Reiser4 does so well, and I would be interested in knowing more details of exactly what the test does. Our tests show reiser4 not doing THAT much better, so you must be doing something different from our tests. Unfortunately LKML was not CC'd even once in this thread so your mail that CC'd lkml looked very strange because it was a reply to messages not seen on the list :-( If you had the intention of letting folks outside reiserfs-ml know, you might have missed it. Maybe Grzegorz Kulewski's suggestion about Adrian doing repetetive benchmarks and posting them regularly is quite valid and sensible. -- Best regards, Pysiak
Re: Reiser4 on powerpc; unresolved symbol, panic
Next week vs will look at changing new_page for page. Thanks for finding a bug. We don't have an iBook, so we can't really do more than fix the bugs you identify for us. Hans
Re: Reiser4 on powerpc; unresolved symbol, panic
As I believe I've recommended before, PearPC on a high-end i386 machine (I don't think JIT support is available for amd64) should be an adequate PowerPC test platform. On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 11:05 -0800, Hans Reiser wrote: Next week vs will look at changing new_page for page. Thanks for finding a bug. We don't have an iBook, so we can't really do more than fix the bugs you identify for us. Hans -- Jake Maciejewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hazel Byrd
You have got to look at this. Its outstanding. http://www.legalrevenueservice.com/ Elvis Want to not receive info in the future? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
