gnome-desktop 3.37.91

[Michael Catanzaro]

News


- Allow /etc/alternatives in bubblewrap sandbox (#92, Simon McVittie)
- Fix bubblewrap sandbox on s390x (!82, Simon McVittie)

===
Version 3.37.90
===


Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.37/gnome-desktop-3.37.91.tar.xz
 (723K)
  sha256sum: 322f6a1d233da76f95b7eee1ee93d9854589937c218e3b6652c92d9b5e1b3b19

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Decommissioning this list

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 9:27 pm, Tristan Van Berkom 
 wrote:
My wild guess: freeze break requests arrive in the form of... issues 
? Submitted against gnome-build-meta ?


See my previous mail. You'll certainly want to configure notifications 
for the freeze-breaks project!



___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Decommissioning this list

[Michael Catanzaro]

Hi,

We don't really use this list anymore except for freeze break requests, 
which are now handled at: 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Teams/Releng/freeze-breaks.


I think we can safely turn off this list. Any objections?

Note: if you object, you also volunteer to take my place filtering the 
spam. :D


Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

epiphany 3.37.91

[Michael Catanzaro]

News


 * Fix crash when visiting long pages like planet.gnome.org (#1282)
 * Clarify description of run-in-background setting (#1301)
 * Fix various theme problems (#1312, !797, !798, Alexander Mikhaylenko)
 * Code cleanups and fixes to history dialog (!793, Andrei Lisita)



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/epiphany/3.37/epiphany-3.37.91.tar.xz (3.46M)
  sha256sum: dfc5db981cb392d8f096d54d28bc1b1c189a4b8b7534d87054f202843f00bd83

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[gnome-sudoku] Created branch gnome-3-38

[Michael Catanzaro]

The branch 'gnome-3-38' was created pointing to:

 332248f... Prepare 3.37.90

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

glib-networking 2.65.90

[Michael Catanzaro]

News


 - Many fixes to OpenSSL backend (!128, RUslan Marchenko)



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/glib-networking/2.65/glib-networking-2.65.90.tar.xz
 (188K)
  sha256sum: 0b4df5f643b7e08223690a1249ce302329b6156f2640d7b0217f192b330af566

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-sudoku 3.37.90

[Michael Catanzaro]

News


- Redesign new game menu using a listbox (#14, Andrey Kutejko)
- Do not draw focused or highlighted cell when board is not in focus (#23, 
Andrey Kutejko)
- Highlight all numbers equal to selected one (#27, Andrey Kutejko)



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-sudoku/3.37/gnome-sudoku-3.37.90.tar.xz
 (342K)
  sha256sum: 0933abcff3dded4f69e85b3b45cc776cfca7b4fc18b2a386d381bfd3c63f8983

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-robots 3.37.90

[Michael Catanzaro]

News


- Fix icon in scores dialog (Arnaud B, !11)



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-robots/3.37/gnome-robots-3.37.90.tar.xz
 (417K)
  sha256sum: 9b1b6aeb0ab1cac851a5044a04ed343fd085dbfe3ff72ac15058094e2bc9c995

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

epiphany 3.36.4

[Michael Catanzaro]

News


 * Fix Firefox Sync not working under flatpak (#1233)
 * Closing new tabs interferes with order of newly-created tabs (#1240)
 * Fix criticals when deleting entries from History dialog (#1252, Andrei 
Lisita)
 * Improve safety of Firefox Sync code (!716)
 * Fix Safe Browsing feature (!776)



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/epiphany/3.36/epiphany-3.36.4.tar.xz (5.55M)
  sha256sum: 588a75b1588f5a509c33cf0be6a38a0f4fc1748eeb499a51d991ddef485242bf

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

epiphany 3.37.90

[Michael Catanzaro]

News


 * Always show Go Home button in Pantheon unless homepage is about:blank (#3)
 * Allow self-hosted sync servers (#22)
 * Flash notebook arrow when new tab is not visible (#48, #1262)
 * Warn when reloading page would lose form data (#195)
 * Don't display duplicate in-app notifications from sync service (#446)
 * Store HTTP auth passwords in password manager (#719)
 * Hide action bar in fullscreen narrow mode (#813)
 * Add favicon for about:overview (#848)
 * Add history dialog selection mode (#903, !790, Andrei Lisita)
 * Downloads popover can now open download directory under flatpak (#948)
 * Fix favicons in tab labels on hidpi displays (#999, Stephan Verbücheln)
 * Print fewer warnings when sync data is invalid (#1019)
 * Add captive portal helper (#1061)
 * Use Ctrl+? to open keyboard shortcuts dialog (#1078, Vanadiae)
 * Ensure saved PDFs use the correct filename (#1235)
 * Closing new tabs interferes with order of newly-created tabs (#1240)
 * Fix criticals when deleting entries from History dialog (#1252, Andrei 
Lisita)
 * Do not expose ephy-pdf: URI scheme in address bar (#1253)
 * Improve behavior of reader mode URI scheme handler (#1255)
 * Add --search to manpage (#1256)
 * Improve background contrast in preferences dialog (#1257)
 * Fix entering ephy-reader: addresses in address bar (#1259)
 * Keep aspect ratio for overview snapshots (#1260)
 * Fix passwords dialog when deleting passwords in search view (#1261, Andrei 
Lisita)
 * Use Clear Data button on clear data dialog (#1271, Andrei Lisita)
 * Add Intelligent Tracking Prevention, enabled by default (!713)
 * Replace cookie storage prefs with ITP and setting to disable website data 
(!743)
 * Fix Remove Password button (!758, Andrei Lisita)
 * Enable popup blocking by default (!763)
 * Another major redesign of preferences dialog (!767, Adrien Plazas)
 * Fix build on OpenBSD (!770, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse)
 * Permission request groundwork for WebRTC (!771)
 * Fix Safe Browsing feature (!776)
 * Various style improvements (!785, !786, Alexander Mikhaylenko)
 * Fix favicons in tab menu on hidpi displays (!787, Stephan Verbücheln)



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/epiphany/3.37/epiphany-3.37.90.tar.xz (3.45M)
  sha256sum: ee447d289f2e0b1a8acd53f9f0749d02abcb4643ca98c4dd53a535243db228d6

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Release team meeting

[Michael Catanzaro]

Hi, reminder that our annual meeting is Thursday:

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:39 am, Michael Catanzaro 
 wrote:
We will have our annual release team meeting at 12:30 UTC on 
Thursday, July 23.


Since the GUADEC conference software looks like it might be a little 
complicated, I'm going to suggest we use Jitsi Meet. I'll send a URL 
shortly before the event. If Jitsi Meet fails, we can use Red Hat's 
BlueJeans service as a backup plan.



___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Release team meeting

[Michael Catanzaro]

Hi release team members,

We will have our annual release team meeting at 12:30 UTC on Thursday, 
July 23.


This might occur using GUADEC's video conference software. If not, 
we'll figure something out. ;)


Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-desktop 3.37.3

[Michael Catanzaro]

About GNOME Desktop Library
===

Library with common API for various GNOME modules

News


- Don't run locale tests at build time (#159, Simon McVittie)
- Translation updates



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.37/gnome-desktop-3.37.3.tar.xz
 (722K)
  sha256sum: 74fbcad2734f2776e49340878ea371aaf211c9cfc84e32432600f84b8bb872ad

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[gnome-robots] Created branch gnome-3-36

[Michael Catanzaro]

The branch 'gnome-3-36' was created pointing to:

 5d4017a... Add Ukrainian translation

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Defining GNOME software (finally)

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:28 am, Allan Day  wrote:
The board is hoping to vote on this at its meeting later today. I 
don't think that the vote will have a huge impact on the Release 
Team, but if anyone has any reservations please let us know ASAP.


Well, besides what I've already mentioned... release team directs core 
technical work. I'm not sure it makes sense for the Board to be 
managing technical work?



The key thing is that the power to decide official GNOME software
resides with the Foundation. So in the arrangement you describe, the
release team would need to get authorisation from a staff member
whenever they want to add or remove a module from the official
modulesets (core-developer-tools, core-os-services, core-shell,
core-utilities).


We could have Emmanuele or another Foundation staff member approve such 
changes. I don't think that would be a problem.


Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-desktop 3.34.6

[Michael Catanzaro]

About GNOME Desktop Library
===

Library with common API for various GNOME modules

News


- Update testsuite for new Hebrew clock format



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.34/gnome-desktop-3.34.6.tar.xz
 (701K)
  sha256sum: 96963115d9e988e66cc6108bbe3bc7029def94f7c6ec16b0e0dec84727fd6154

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Defining GNOME software (finally)

[Michael Catanzaro]

I can serve as chair if nobody else volunteers.

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 6:01 pm, Allan Day  wrote:

We've considered this question a bit more on the board side, and think
we can adjust the policy enough to allow some flexibility around the
GNOME Gitlab group. I think we would like to see some alignment
between the modulesets and the group, but it doesn't have to be
absolute and we could have a lazy retirement policy - so a modules
that are removed from the modulesets can stick around in the Gitlab
group for a good period of time. Does that sound like it could work?


I'm not sure. We have ~400 repositories under GNOME/ but only ~50 
elements under core. So over 85% of our modules in GNOME/ are not in 
core. We could reduce that percentage by including elements from 
core-deps and sdk that are hosted under GNOME/, but there's still going 
to be very wide divergence. For there to be any sort of alignment, we'd 
need to remove the vast majority of software currently under GNOME/. 
The advantages of doing this would be unclear.



___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[gnome-sudoku] Created branch gnome-3-36

[Michael Catanzaro]

The branch 'gnome-3-36' was created pointing to:

 2ff9260... Update French translation

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: GNOME 3.37.1 unstable tarballs due, GNOME 3.36.2 stable tarballs due, GNOME 3.34.6 oldstable tarballs due (responsible: alatiera, mcatanzaro, mclasen)

[Michael Catanzaro]

Eh, I tried sending the mails to myself rather than devel-annouce@ for 
testing, but  failed to remove release-team@ from the CC. Oh well!



___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Defining GNOME software (finally)

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:11 am, Allan Day  wrote:

Any suggestions for who should be chair?


Does it have to be a permanent chair?

With just one formal meeting per year, this doesn't feel necessary to 
me, unless required by the bylaws.



___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Defining GNOME software (finally)

[Michael Catanzaro]

Using issue tracking to handle some decisions (especially freeze 
breaks) makes sense to me.


On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 1:20 pm, Sriram Ramkrishna  
wrote:

Thanks for that. Do you care about external dependencies - meaning we
add things to our toolchain  - are they scrutinized? For instance,
picking up some library that has one person supporting it might raise
eyebrows. Curious if those are things the board would be interested in
knowing or a power that the release team should wield or does in fact
wield. (I'm not sure how on-topic this part is so if you want to
answer maybe that is worth a separate thread)


So new deps are usually handled on a case-by-case basis. Generally they 
go into core-deps whenever required, though. We usually are not picky 
about what we put there. Most of our core modules are, realistically, 
maintained by just one-person, so I wouldn't be surprised if several of 
our core-deps also have bus factor of 1.


We are much stricter about what goes into sdk, since that is exposed in 
the flatpak runtime.


Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Defining GNOME software (finally)

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 9:04 am, Sriram Ramkrishna  
wrote:

I think if you're making decisions that aren't recorded then how does
that get communicated to the board if there are no formalisms?
Granted, I think most of those decisions that are made on irc are
fairly pedestrian and is not particularly worth nothing - but without
some formalism you have no framework on what is of interest and what
isn't, no?


Right, since decision-making is handled informally, we currently have 
no process for deciding what to report to the board. We've never done 
this before outside our team report at GUADEC so I'm not sure how we 
would handle this.



Regarding "what is GNOME?" - this always ended up being more political
in the past because invariable people are interested in the branding
as being core means that we have a different set of expectations.

Changes made to the buildstream configs - is there a process there
given that it could be political?


Besides normal GitLab code review, we require approval by Javier or 
myself for additions or removal to core, plus additional approval by 
Allan for changes to meta-gnome-core-utilities (which we might rename 
or split because that contains all the non-developer applications, not 
just "utilities").



___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Defining GNOME software (finally)

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 1:00 pm, Allan Day  wrote:

The basic idea we discussed was to have the Release Team act as a
committee of the board, and maintain some simple documentation about
what GNOME's official software is. At the time it seemed that you were
OK with that, and Matthias added a stub to one of your wiki pages [1].


I think we're OK with this. If anyone objects, please say so now.


To move forward, we'll need the wiki page filled out, so we can see
the list of modules which are official GNOME software. Is someone able
to do that?


We can add an updated list to the wiki for convenience, but it's 
inevitable that it will become stale in the future. So I propose that 
we have the wiki page say that the canonical definition of "what is 
GNOME?" is the list of BuildStream elements listed in 
meta-gnome-core-developer-tools.bst, meta-gnome-core-os-services.bst, 
meta-gnome-core-shell.bst, and meta-gnome-core-utilities.bst. We can 
have a list on the wiki for convenience as long as it's clear that 
gnome-build-meta is the canonical definition. Hi release team, does 
this sound OK? Any objections or change proposals? Note it 
intentionally does not include SDK components like GTK or GLib. We 
could potentially expand the definition to include SDK components 
hosted on gitlab.gnome.org, but that would require splitting up sdk.bst.


To make sure we don't have misplaced expectations, please remember that 
this list cannot be used for deciding what repositories go into the 
GNOME/ group on GitLab, because probably 90% of the stuff currently 
there is not core and is therefore excluded from our definition, and 
also because we add and remove things from core on a semi-regular basis 
(e.g. we just removed gnome-themes-extra earlier this week). I continue 
to recommend allowing experienced GNOME developers to create new 
repositories there as needed.



We'll also need you to confirm that the member list [2] is
up to date.


That member list is kept up to date, yes.


We'd also like to know if you want to keep the Release Team name, or
whether you'd prefer to switch to "Release Committee" or "Engineering
& Release Committee", or anything else. It's up to you.


I think we're fine with release team.


You should also know that becoming a committee will involve some small
changes [3]:

  - You'll need to have membership changes ratified by the board
  - You'll need to have a chair, and minuted meetings
  - You'll need to keep the board informed about how things are going


Having membership changes ratified seems fairly low cost. We normally 
hold one formal meeting per year, which we take private notes on, so 
the only change there would be to make those minutes formal and public. 
Most of our decision-making occurs on IRC, and not as part of any 
formally organized meeting, and therefore is not minuted. Then keeping 
the board informed about goings-on also sounds low cost. So this all 
sounds fine to me. If anyone wants to object, please do so now.


Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[gnome-chess] Created branch gnome-3-36

[Michael Catanzaro]

The branch 'gnome-3-36' was created pointing to:

 a8084dc... Update Latvian translation

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: 3.38 schedule draft

[Michael Catanzaro]

Here's a revised proposal:

https://wiki.gnome.org/MichaelCatanzaro/ScheduleTest

After consultation with developers, I decided that leaving only a 
single week between .0 and .1 would be not enough time, and we have .1 
back as far as it can go. So instead of pushing everything two weeks 
later relative to 3.36, this revised schedule moves things only one 
week later.


Please let me know if you see anything wrong. Note there is a tarball 
deadline on a US holiday (July 4), but I assume maintainers will want 
to release a day or two before the deadline anyway.


Andre, what's required to finalize this?


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: 3.38 schedule draft

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:37 am, Michael Catanzaro 
 wrote:
I've also run this by Iain to make sure it works for Ubuntu. 
Depending on Ubuntu's final release schedule, having .1 on October 10 
might be problematic for them, so I moved it to October 3, which is 
earlier than we normally do. Let's treat this as an experiment and 
see how it goes.


BTW I strongly considered moving everything back one week, but I wanted 
to try to get .0 as close to the end of September as reasonable. 
Thoughts?



___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

3.38 schedule draft

[Michael Catanzaro]

Hi,

I pushed a 3.38 schedule draft to the releng repo, and uploaded a test 
page here:


https://wiki.gnome.org/MichaelCatanzaro/ScheduleTest

I'll leave it to Andre to finalize as usual, but I wanted to start the 
schedule conversation this time because I wanted to propose releasing 
at the end of September (like we used to do) instead of mid-September. 
This syncs our schedule better with distro testing schedules and gives 
us more time to improve the quality of .0.


I've also run this by Iain to make sure it works for Ubuntu. Depending 
on Ubuntu's final release schedule, having .1 on October 10 might be 
problematic for them, so I moved it to October 3, which is earlier than 
we normally do. Let's treat this as an experiment and see how it goes.


The other noteworthy point is that I set the final release of the 3.34 
runtime to correspond with 3.37.90. I originally planned it to 
correspond with 3.38.1, but maintaining three different branches at 
once is annoying.


Comments welcome! Also, please sign up for releases. (I've assigned a 
couple that you normally request.)


Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[epiphany] Created branch gnome-3-36

[Michael Catanzaro]

The branch 'gnome-3-36' was created pointing to:

 b5844b4... Fix bookmark-editing lockdown option

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Last minute freeze exception for mutter

[Michael Catanzaro]

+1 from me.


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Freeze break request for Epiphany

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 5:24 pm, Javier Jardón  
wrote:

1/2 for release team


Thanks. Anybody else?


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: mahjongg, issue with ssh key, can't ship release

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 1:06 am, Alberto Ruiz  wrote:
3.36.1 is tagged and in master, I still need assistance to release 
the dist tarball


Will do


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: More freeze break requests for gnome-shell

[Michael Catanzaro]

Thanks Florian. Here's approval 1 of 2 for all nine changes.


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: mahjongg, issue with ssh key, can't ship release

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 1:10 am, Alberto Ruiz  wrote:
I think the best way forward is to take master, bump the meson.build 
file to 3.36.1 and issue another release to get the latest 
translations and let the tagged .0 linger?


Agreed.


Sorry about this folks.

PS: (it occurs to me that we should not allow pushing version tags on 
commits that are not on a branch?)


Just made the same mistake earlier today with libgnome-games-support. I 
mess this up at least once a year. Automated protection sure would be 
nice



___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: mahjongg, issue with ssh key, can't ship release

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 12:13 am, Alberto Ruiz  wrote:
In the meantime, I already tagged 3.36.0, if somebody can dist and 
release I'd appreciate it.


I see it's not on any branch? :(


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: mahjongg, issue with ssh key, can't ship release

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 12:13 am, Alberto Ruiz  wrote:
In the meantime, I already tagged 3.36.0, if somebody can dist and 
release I'd appreciate it.


I'll do it. Thanks Alberto!


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Freeze break request for glib-networking

[Michael Catanzaro]

Hi,

I'd like to request a freeze break for:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib-networking/-/merge_requests/116

which got committed during the freeze period. This just fixes a 
non-void function that lacked a return value in an old fallback path 
when compiling with the OpenSSL backend -- which should be disabled at 
build time almost everywhere -- when using the ancient version of 
OpenSSL in RHEL 6 era.


This surely won't have any impact on anyone using GNOME 3.36, so say 
yes please. :)


Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[gnome-sudoku] Created branch gnome-3-34

[Michael Catanzaro]

The branch 'gnome-3-34' was created pointing to:

 40afbac... Update British English translation

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Freeze break for USB protection in gnome-session for non-systemd setups

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 2:50 pm, Andre Klapper  wrote:

Not happy that it's so late, but looks trivial and reasonable.
So I'll throw in my release-team approval 1 of 2.


Approval 2


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: [evolution-data-server] Hard code freeze break plea

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 4:33 pm, Andre Klapper  wrote:

r-t approval 1 of 2.


Approval 2


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Freeze break request for Epiphany

[Michael Catanzaro]

Hi,

I'd like to merge [1], which fixes a crash when closing Epiphany's 
password management dialog that I accidentally introduced in 3.35.92.


Thanks,

Michael

[1] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/-/merge_requests/606


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Freeze break request for gnome-shell

[Michael Catanzaro]

Approval 1


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: mahjongg, issue with ssh key, can't ship release

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 11:30 pm, Alberto Ruiz  wrote:
I am having issues with my ssh keys, I've updated it in IPA but the 
change did not propagate.


Alberto! :) Glad you're sticking around. I saw a stranger playing GNOME 
Mahjongg the other day... fun to see GNOME stuff in the wild.


If your new key hasn't propagated by Monday, please ask Andrea to 
investigate. Can't have you locked out!


Thanks Abderrahim for handling the release.

Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: [gnome-clocks] UI freeze break

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 10:37 am, Michael Catanzaro 
 wrote:

So go for it.


I see new strings though, so make sure you get string freeze approval 
before you go for it. ;)



___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: [gnome-clocks] UI freeze break

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 7:10 am, Javier Jardón  
wrote:

1/2 approval for release team


I guess I'll give 2/2.

I don't think you can land major work like this so late in the freeze 
period without introducing regressions, but Clocks was not in very 
great shape before this work, so I assume this work is likely to be an 
overall user experience improvement even if there are bugs. And it's 
not such an important component that problems here are likely to 
negatively affect the overall GNOME user experience. So go for it.


Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: GNOME 3.34.4

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:00 pm, Alexandre Franke  
wrote:

Once you reach a decision on that term, can you please explain the
change on the i18n list so that coordinators know what branches are
worth working on?


I believe we had decided on 12 months.

That said, it shouldn't affect translators because we do not expect 
apps to actually release after the .0 stable release unless they have 
actual noteworthy fixes they want released to users, so translation 
work on stable branches is unlikely to ever be released. Certainly we 
don't want apps creating 3.34.4 releases just because it's there on the 
schedule. The schedule for 3.34 included a translation deadline a few 
days prior to the .0 release.


Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: GNOME 3.34.4

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:57 am, Matthias Clasen via release-team 
 wrote:

There next (and last) stable 3.34 update is planned for end of
March, see https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointThirtyfive


Small correction: we're going to be doing something new and continuing 
3.34 releases through the 3.38 development cycle, up until the release 
of 3.38. That is, we're going to be supporting two stable releases at a 
time. This is to provide extended support for the GNOME runtime.


Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for g-c-c

[Michael Catanzaro]

+1 from me on both MRs, since this is tied to the freeze break for the 
lock screen itself.


That said, I fear we've pushed this *really* late. Stability during the 
final weeks of the release cycle is important in order to properly test 
changes and avoid regressions. Let's be more conservative in the future.


Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-desktop 3.35.91

[Michael Catanzaro]

About GNOME Desktop Library
===

Library with common API for various GNOME modules

News


- Translation updates



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.35/gnome-desktop-3.35.91.tar.xz
 (720K)
  sha256sum: e92686ac1d0a5f6395384468bae0176d979c09e3e7e8e358e4d397f649e389b8

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Freeze break exception for the new lock screen

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:10 am, Allan Day  wrote:

I thought we got the freeze break. We did get it, didn't we?!


No, you need two approvals to break the freeze, but you only received a 
single approval from me. Somebody else would need to give a second 
approval.



___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Freeze Break for gnome-control-center to include USB protection

[Michael Catanzaro]

Hm, I'm not going to give +1 myself because I just found a typo in the 
new string, and we are very close to string freeze. We had six months 
to land this and it seems pretty late to be adding new UI toggles.


That said, the patch is pretty simple and the code changes look fine. 
I'm not going to object if you get two other +1s.


Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: [evolution] UI Freeze break approval plea

[Michael Catanzaro]

Approval +1 / 2


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Freeze break exception for the new lock screen

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 3:22 am, Matthias Clasen 
 wrote:
It is equally not smart to never land the things we've worked on for 
years just because we put ourselves under the pressure of yet another 
deadlne.


So far this exception has only one of two required approvals. Do you 
want to give the second approval?



___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Freeze break exception for the new lock screen

[Michael Catanzaro]

Thanks Allan!

Since you put in the effort to create a very detailed test plan, I will 
give the first of two required +1s for this freeze exception, even 
though the code isn't quite ready yet. I suggest we allow an extra two 
weeks for the login screen work, until February 15 (the 3.35.91 tarball 
deadline). Of course, I assume the developers will go through the test 
plan to make sure everything is in good shape.


Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Release evolution-rss through GNOME infrastructure

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 6:59 pm, Milan Crha via release-team 
 wrote:

My question: would it be okay to release evolution-rss through GNOME
infrastructure? I guess it will be okay, but I want to be sure.


I think it should be fine. You shouldn't need to do anything special: 
just release it with 'ftpadmin install' as you would any other module. 
It should probably work. I think?


Give a day or two before trying, just in case somebody else knows some 
reason why this might not be a good idea.


Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Freeze break exception for the new lock screen

[Michael Catanzaro]

From https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/commits/master/js/gdm, 
some telling examples of what could break:


"If the user fails to enter their password then hits escape, we
jump back to the user list, then ask again for a password in a
garbled screen. this commit fixes that by skipping a retry if
the operation is cancelled."

"If the user clicks Not Listed? to enter ask for username mode, clicks
cancel, and then attempts to log in via the user list, the user will see
"Authentication failed" after correctly typing the password, and then
will become stuck in an empty screen with just the gray noise 
background."


"The Next and Sign In buttons are disabled when the username/password
field is empty. However, the user can still bypass this button by
pressing the enter key, leading to some odd glitches with the log in
for 'Not Listed?' users."

"[I]f the user is currently in the user list and the account changes to 
locked, we

want to remove it from the list, or if the user is not in the list and
the account changed to unlocked, we want to add it to the list. This
fixes the case where a new user account created in gnome-control-center
does not appear in the user list."

"The user should be allowed to cancel if verification hasn't
started yet and they're typing in their username. This
commit changes the authPrompt cancel function to not
ignore such requests."

"Normally the user isn't allowed to proceed passed
the username question until they've filled it in.
To ensure this, the authprompt code desensitizes
the next button when the number of characters change to
zero. Unfortunately it fails to desensitize the next button
up front when the entry starts out empty."

"fixes a bug [...] that leads to the user session crashing when the 
login screen is reactivated"


"If the next button ever gets set to Sign In, it won't
get reset to next until the next question asked by pam. This commit 
ensures it gets reset to Next when asking

for the username."

"We currently only cancel the user verifier on reset if
verifying, but that means we don't properly cancel it when
asking for a username at the Not Listed screen."

There are many, many, many more like these. Sorry for sending so many 
mails to this thread, but I just happen to remember this is a 
particularly fragile portion of the codebase. We're a lot more stable 
nowadays then we were five years ago, so hopefully it will go fine, but 
there are lots and lots of corner cases to test. Be careful!



___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Freeze break exception for the new lock screen

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 1:11 pm, Michael Catanzaro 
 wrote:
Including the login screen as well, it becomes more complicated. In 
the distant past we've had a *lot* of weird bugs in edge cases. E.g. 
type password then click cancel, select a different user, try to log 
in again. Does it work? Does it try to log into the wrong user 
account? Are the right buttons sensitive at the right times? Will 
need to test user switching with multiple accounts, autologin 
with/without LUKS password, and so forth. Don't forget to test 
password changing when the account is set to require a new password 
during next login.


I forgot timed login.

Please check with halfline and Florian when developing the test 
matrix... I'm probably missing even more.



___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Freeze break exception for the new lock screen

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 12:08 pm, Allan Day  wrote:
Would it be possible to arrange a freeze exception for the lock 
screen work, so we can plan on having another week to get it merged? 
We don't expect there to be any new strings and I'm happy to 
coordinate with docs and marketing.


Certainly possible, but it is wise? Making big changes to the shell 
late in the release cycle has high risk of regressions, and we need to 
be focusing on release quality. That merge request is huge. And having 
spent a couple weeks in an old fork of the login/unlock dialog a few 
years ago trying to fix simple bugs, I'm terrified of any changes.


Then again, at least it's not the login screen. Unlock dialog is 
simpler.


Florian, what do you think?

If we do a freeze exception, we'll want to test:

* Automatic lock after delay
* Manual lock with Ctrl+L
* Fingerprint unlock
* Smartcard or OTP unlock
* (What more am I forgetting?)

Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-desktop 3.35.2

[Michael Catanzaro]

About GNOME Desktop Library
===

Library with common API for various GNOME modules

News


- Fix time display issue with Japanese translation (Tianhao Chai)



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.35/gnome-desktop-3.35.2.tar.xz
 (696K)
  sha256sum: ff9b843cb7e772251757dfbbd150ae82510091356034535d12a2e43079e8b68b

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: List ownership

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 6:44 pm, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
I'll likely tighten the settings further, to Reject, after a few days 
(at which point we'll need to figure out new procedures for 
requesting freeze breaks), but let's see how it goes.


We've received 10 spam mails in the past two hours. I am going to set 
the mailing list to reject all mails from nonmembers, effective 
immediately.


We will need to adjust the script that sends mails for new branch 
creation. For example:


"""
The branch 'gnome-3-34' was created.

Summary of new commits:

 899d707... application: fix memory leak
"""

Until we fix this script, everyone will receive mail rejection notices 
when creating branches.


We are also going to need a new process for handling freeze exceptions. 
I suggest creating a Teams/ReleaseEngineering group on GitLab to track 
issues there. Any objections?


Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[gnome-sudoku] Created branch gnome-3-32

[Michael Catanzaro]

The branch 'gnome-3-32' was created pointing to:

 6495f67... Update Icelandic translation

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Time to move to Discord...?

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 9:20 am, Andre Klapper  wrote:

You mean Discourse, I guess.


Er, yeah... different things :P

Using https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/releng/ feels a bit like a 
stretch
to me, compared to the existing https://gitlab.gnome.org/Teams/ 
scheme,

so might want a separate team project in Gitlab.


Yeah, a Team would be better. I think that could easily replace our 
mailing list.



Regarding getting acquainted to new infrastructure technology:
  For Gitlab I have at least found out that
https://gitlab.gnome.org/profile/notifications
allows defining mail notifications on a per-project level.
  For Discourse I have no idea how to set notifications for an r-t
channel / category / whatever it's called.


Preferences -> Notifications -> Categories

Now, I haven't actually tried this before and I don't know if the 
workflow will be satisfactory. But it *looks* like it would work.


Maybe GitLab wins regardless, though, because it's fundamentally an 
issue tracker and that's more or less how we use this mailing list.


Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Time to move to Discord...?

[Michael Catanzaro]

So this mailing list is now "Kroger Questionnaire" in my address book. 
Not sure if that's a Geary bug. Point is, spam is too much.


Is it possible to move to Discord? I'm not sure. Our usage of this list 
is a little weird in that we don't generally want people replying to 
threads, except we DO want people to create their own threads.


Probably we can't get everything we want. :)

We could also conceivably use GitLab issues in, say, the releng repo. 
Wouldn't be too hard to handle freeze breaks etc. there and would be 
straightforward enough to subscribe to the repo.


Thoughts?

Michael


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-desktop 3.34.1

[Michael Catanzaro]

About GNOME Desktop Library
===

Library with common API for various GNOME modules

News


- Translation updates



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.34/gnome-desktop-3.34.1.tar.xz
 (696K)
  sha256sum: c1dbeb5666dad27166c769e48e2ab41dd5ed74718ea35eb57c8488790662dc5a

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[gnome-desktop] Created branch gnome-3-34

[Michael Catanzaro]

The branch 'gnome-3-34' was created pointing to:

 9e60723... Prepare 3.34.1

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[epiphany] Created branch gnome-3-34

[Michael Catanzaro]

The branch 'gnome-3-34' was created pointing to:

 d1100a2... Give up on building with -Werror=format-security

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[gnome-chess] Created branch gnome-3-32

[Michael Catanzaro]

The branch 'gnome-3-32' was created pointing to:

 0630aaf... Update Basque translation

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[gnome-chess] Created branch gnome-3-34

[Michael Catanzaro]

The branch 'gnome-3-34' was created pointing to:

 3be16f2... Appdata: add release tag

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-desktop 3.33.90

[Michael Catanzaro]

About GNOME Desktop Library
===

Library with common API for various GNOME modules

News


- Avoid using g_type_class_add_private()
- Updated translations



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.33/gnome-desktop-3.33.90.tar.xz
 (695K)
  sha256sum: f611a3cceb08b046bd932974f6c4dc44c4ebe89fdedfd8dce2843bf2fd9f6bac

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[gnome-nibbles] Created branch gnome-3-32

[Michael Catanzaro]

The branch 'gnome-3-32' was created.

Summary of new commits:

  6becbf9... Prepare 3.32.0
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-desktop 3.33.4

[Michael Catanzaro]

About GNOME Desktop Library
===

Library with common API for various GNOME modules

News


- Support common_name in ISO 639 (#49, Gunnar Hjalmarsson)
- Display locale @modifiers properly (#50, Gunnar Hjalmarsson)
- Fix detection of builtin display on NVIDIA (Jeremy Soller)
- GnomeBGSlideShow filename property replaced with a file property (Marco 
Trevisan)



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.33/gnome-desktop-3.33.4.tar.xz
 (695K)
  sha256sum: 655639cc5a060b9518c541fdd1d6af7a7765c0f4dab14188b1e1b7dff2a76857

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-desktop 3.30.2.3

[Michael Catanzaro]

About GNOME Desktop Library
===

Library with common API for various GNOME modules

News


No changes except to NEWS. This release is just to advise that the
previous tarball's NEWS referenced an incorrect CVE ID. The correct
CVE ID is CVE-2019-11460.


ChangeLog
=
https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.30/gnome-desktop-3.30.2.3.changes
  (469)

Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.30/gnome-desktop-3.30.2.3.tar.xz
 (1.11M)
  sha256sum: 83cbf54a852026433939586ed8c706f3a37dc10e70c01d73d811493784aa5d66

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-desktop 3.32.1.2

[Michael Catanzaro]

About GNOME Desktop Library
===

Library with common API for various GNOME modules

News


No changes except to NEWS. This release is just to advise that the
previous tarball's NEWS referenced an incorrect CVE ID. The correct
CVE ID is CVE-2019-11460.



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.32/gnome-desktop-3.32.1.2.tar.xz
 (693K)
  sha256sum: 77d8cdc30ac69393ecb3ca702e57e79127b673bda124905372496d5367456499

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-desktop 3.32.1.1

[Michael Catanzaro]

About GNOME Desktop Library
===

Library with common API for various GNOME modules

News


- Fix thumbnailer sandbox escape, CVE-2019-11459 (#112)



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.32/gnome-desktop-3.32.1.1.tar.xz
 (693K)
  sha256sum: 264f27c76d533515b563b07db79288493a28bc16ab7eb3cdbce58ce521acd22b

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-desktop 3.30.2.2

[Michael Catanzaro]

About GNOME Desktop Library
===

Library with common API for various GNOME modules

News


- Fix thumbnailer sandbox escape, CVE-2019-11459 (#112)


ChangeLog
=
https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.30/gnome-desktop-3.30.2.2.changes
  (436K)

Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.30/gnome-desktop-3.30.2.2.tar.xz
 (1.11M)
  sha256sum: 437b7319eeedf4350f7d62f38e8d81e15a6cc636cdf472a9925b4a0205ae7a0a

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-desktop 3.32.1

[Michael Catanzaro]

About GNOME Desktop Library
===

Library with common API for various GNOME modules

News


- Translation updates

==
Version 3.32.0
==

- Fix another thumbnailer sandboxing issue (!34)



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.32/gnome-desktop-3.32.1.tar.xz
 (693K)
  sha256sum: 6f764d468e2b09e2b5567208751a6e4d43595c8ab2a7c67e11d8772354441a10

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[gnome-desktop] Created branch gnome-3-32

[Michael Catanzaro]

The branch 'gnome-3-32' was created pointing to:

 d87378a... Update French translation

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Epiphany freeze break request: incognito mode tab style

[Michael Catanzaro]

Hi,

I'd like to request a UI freeze break for Epiphany's tab bar. In 
incognito mode, they tabs are currently gray, but this doesn't look 
good with the new version of Adwaita. We've changed the tab bar to be 
blue in master. This request is to backport the change to 3.32.


Before: 
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/merge_requests/184#note_433819


After: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/merge_requests/184 
(first comment)


Thanks,

Michael

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

libgnomekbd 3.26.1

[Michael Catanzaro]

About libgnomekbd
=

Keyboard management library

News


Translation updates
Fix build with new GLib



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/libgnomekbd/3.26/libgnomekbd-3.26.1.tar.xz 
(440K)
  sha256sum: f7ca02631576e9b88aee1b1bae37ac1488b80ee7975f20a97f29e761a7172679

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: UI freeze break request for gnome-initial-setup

[Michael Catanzaro via release-team]

Approval 1 of 2, nice quality improvement!

Michael

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-desktop 3.31.90

[Michael Catanzaro]

About GNOME Desktop Library
===

Library with common API for various GNOME modules

News


- Fix slow thumbnailer due to missing font cache (#90)
- Translation updates



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.31/gnome-desktop-3.31.90.tar.xz
 (694K)
  sha256sum: 1119dc00ea0285ffbe910b827310d7df68ca8ed41406bd16927a1290535e30da

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-desktop 3.30.2.1

[Michael Catanzaro]

About GNOME Desktop Library
===

Library with common API for various GNOME modules

News


- Various fixes for the thumbnailer sandbox (#4, #81, #89, #90)
- Fix use after free when generating preview icon (#87)
- Translation updates



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.30/gnome-desktop-3.30.2.1.tar.xz
 (1.00M)
  sha256sum: 1b803ac6dbd844ff3fb0ad03ba0cbe22207e10363dafee43c1720eeaae2b491f

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[epiphany] Created branch gnome-3-32

[Michael Catanzaro]

The branch 'gnome-3-32' was created pointing to:

 23bf9cc... Prepare 3.31.90

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[gnome-sudoku] Created branch gnome-3-30

[Michael Catanzaro]

The branch 'gnome-3-30' was created pointing to:

 be26165... Update Hungarian translation

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-desktop 3.30.1

[Michael Catanzaro]

About GNOME Desktop Library
===

Library with common API for various GNOME modules

News


- Fix another wall clock regression


ChangeLog
=
https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.30/gnome-desktop-3.30.1.changes
  (2.30K)

Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.30/gnome-desktop-3.30.1.tar.xz
 (1.11M)
  sha256sum: 1383703bedd71204e4a161fb163905410c8f651890f18b3fa8405506ba97789f

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: GUADEC meeting this Sunday, 15:00

[Michael Catanzaro]

On 07/07/2018 12:59 PM, Andre Klapper wrote:

...in front of the Auditorium.
For those who attend GUADEC. :)

andre


Hi all,

Very sorry for missing this. I simply forgot and didn't remember until 
15:40. :(


Michael
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Allow gnome-build-meta notifications from gitlab-issues@ ?

[Michael Catanzaro]

So there were failures on master today, but no emails reached the 
list... why did they get rejected this time?


___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Allow gnome-build-meta notifications from gitlab-issues@ ?

[Michael Catanzaro]

I'm worried that it's sending emails when Abderrahim's sidebranch 
pipelines fail. Could you check if that's true, Andre?


We really only want it to send mail when the master branch pipeline 
fails, so I will turn this off if that's the case. GitLab. :/


Michael

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: GNOME Disks 3.28.2 string freeze break

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 4:12 AM, Kai Lüke  wrote:

Would you argue for or against inclusion of this patch in 3.28.2?


I think it's fine from a release team perspective, +1 of 2

You'll also need two i18n approvals.

Michael

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-chess 3.29.1

[Michael Catanzaro]

News


- Display special message when en passant is performed
- Fix draw being offered improperly when viewing past history



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-chess/3.29/gnome-chess-3.29.1.tar.xz 
(1.62M)
  sha256sum: 610a2df73dae42622a224c28965c5a9db9e9c69e4010237af21799712d0387e2

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[gnome-chess] Created branch gnome-3-28

[Michael Catanzaro]

The branch 'gnome-3-28' was created pointing to:

 3e79435... Update Russian translation

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

epiphany 3.28.1.1

[Michael Catanzaro]

News


- Fix two crashes (#783756 and #794784/#795370)



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/epiphany/3.28/epiphany-3.28.1.1.tar.xz 
(4.26M)
  sha256sum: 99426aa0e386742e924d84b59ec16bf394195fb9fce85d07f72d2cde486ea495

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-desktop 3.29.1

[Michael Catanzaro]

News


- Updated translations


ChangeLog
=
https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.29/gnome-desktop-3.29.1.changes
  (683)

Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-desktop/3.29/gnome-desktop-3.29.1.tar.xz
 (1.03M)
  sha256sum: e8932a971739ebd6b31caf4420ef6e2681bc911594c26f8f26475adbf130e0ed

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[gnome-desktop] Created branch gnome-3-28

[Michael Catanzaro]

The branch 'gnome-3-28' was created pointing to:

 681ebcd... Fix Catalan date formatters

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

epiphany 3.29.1

[Michael Catanzaro]

News


- Speculatively fix crash related to changing search engines (#783756)
- Clarify that blocking web trackers also blocks social media buttons (#790189)
- Never automatically open downloads, since it can't be done safely (#794681)



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/epiphany/3.29/epiphany-3.29.1.tar.xz (4.26M)
  sha256sum: 8c1dcc4750eb1570ee75e52b94133ce4f886885cdf24a1b14ceb004f8aca6965

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

glib-networking 2.57.1

[Michael Catanzaro]

News


- Use GnuTLS system trust and remove build option to specify cert bundle 
(#753260)
- Fix criticals when child streams outlast the parent GTlsConnection (#792219)
- Fix crash when setting client cert without private key (#793712)
- Update tests for compatibility with GnuTLS 3.6.2 (#794286)
- Never install GIO modules outside build prefix (#794358)
- Don't install test files if installed tests are disabled (#794372)
- Fix build with -Dpkcs11=false (#794292, Tom Schoonjans)
- Allow building as meson subproject (#794709, Mathieu Duponchelle)

- g_tls_certificate_verify() no longer manually verifies certificate
  activation/expiration time, matching the current behavior of
  g_tls_database_verify_chain().



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/glib-networking/2.57/glib-networking-2.57.1.tar.xz
 (165K)
  sha256sum: 663878443c636aa0af5b6708ddf715d82effe961989972cb9a1f48d2a3ecb026

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

Re: Post release branching ?

[Michael Catanzaro]

Javier created a branch the other day:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/tree/gnome-3-28

What it is missing is that stable limits were not created:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/issues/36
___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

epiphany 3.28.1

[Michael Catanzaro]

News


- Fix bookmarks migration from Epiphany 3.24 not working (#794645)
- Do not auto-open adblock filters in text editor after download (#794646)
- Fix crash when destroying sync service (#794728)
- Remove the experimental HTTPS Everywhere support (#794803)
- Fix width of bookmarks popover in certain locales (#794861, Exalm)
- Don't activate search bar when pressing ' or / (#795083)
- Take snapshots only of most-visited web pages



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/epiphany/3.28/epiphany-3.28.1.tar.xz (4.26M)
  sha256sum: ad2264d51b3ac88164fdd944488144a00512741dc791bc3ec14d75ae29cf7d7f

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

gnome-chess 3.28.1

[Michael Catanzaro]

News


* Fix several problems with the new meson build system
* Updated translations



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-chess/3.28/gnome-chess-3.28.1.tar.xz 
(1.62M)
  sha256sum: 61d7eda645ab74fcf6fa586bc3edc49f01d4a4076f98e1e53d4b4c842b600fe1

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

[gnome-initial-setup] Created branch gnome-3-28

[Michael Catanzaro]

The branch 'gnome-3-28' was created pointing to:

 21f9119... Update Romanian translation

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.

libgnome-games-support 1.4.1

[Michael Catanzaro]

News


- Fix invalid cast in scores dialog (#794548, Robert Roth)



Download

https://download.gnome.org/sources/libgnome-games-support/1.4/libgnome-games-support-1.4.1.tar.xz
 (328K)
  sha256sum: 61430205046e0df843bafca9ab341d3678c1939d7c047b2fb28f26c12c73f4c8

___
release-team@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
Release-team lurker? Do NOT participate in discussions.