[Repeater-Builder] Re: M2 CAS
I have used high band IFAS in UHF and visa versa with out much ado. The injection chain needs to be thought about, i.e. one may need to change injection side to stay in the tuning range. I am not sure about low band IFAS especially those with NB. I would guess with out trying one out that this might need some mod. The other point made was a good one. There are known porblems with doing a repeater in a standard MII mobile chassis. That's one of the reasons the E chassis was done (along with others). One of the reasons the amp on stations was mounted on the back is for servicing. The other reason is it solved some ground current problems in certain station configuration. If you want a ham repeater try the mobile. If you want a commercial grade repeater, use a station chassis with the continuous duty amp or a fan cooled mobile amp. Its just my opinion, other may differ. 73 Ed K3SWJ --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Fred, Very good points. Question, have you successfully used an IFAS with a different IF frequency without modifications? Joe, K1ke Fred Seamans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: = Possible elimination procedures are High Side Rx injection, swap out the IFAS and Hi IF boards for ones with a different IF, use more by pass caps, etc. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Comm Spec TP-38
Brent wrote: Hello Skipp, I have all known tones turned on and active..(double checked that a few times) It will not decode them or show them at all it will show and decode all below 100.0 with no problem, and it does that like it should with no delay.. but if i try the 100.0 it has to have that tone signal present for at least 3 seconds before it will show or decode it.. it is like a audio amp gone bad or some thing.. but i did swap them around and reset the x2122 in the unit and still no difference.. I must be missing some type of failure somewhere.. Brent I'd start looking at the audio response from the source first. It sounds like there there's a low pass that's passing too low. Look at the audio going into the controller with a scope. There should be very little variance in tone level up to about 250-300 hz. It also need to be a VERY clean sine wave. If there's even a little distortion, it won't work as well. Maybe the detector in the receiver is a bit out of alignment? I see that all the time. -- Jim Barbour WD8CHL Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] FS Kenwood TK-840 K3 403-430mhz NIB
Ken Arck wrote: At 10:12 PM 2/22/2005 -, you wrote: You can have this one delivered to your door (in the US) for $180. ---That HAS to be a typo? Ken Maybe not-that's a discontinued radio... And it's an odd split. I played with a few of those, it will make it up to a little above 450 and that's about it. And at that power out has dropped a good bit, seems like 5-10W was about it for 450.000. -- Jim Barbour WD8CHL PS-420-430 is commercial near the great lakes...lots of LTR activity... Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Repeater-Builder] Re: Remote Receivers and Optimal Use of CTCSS
Depends on what equipment you use. Many rf linked voting sites are made of commercial repeater equipment, which easily strips and re-inserts the sub tone. In a commercial system, strip and re-insert is the desired method. The above method reduces the variable, often extra hot tx ctcss deviation levels often found in out of the box ham radios. skipp Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another in my periodic series of questions dealing with best practices (dontcha love bidness buzzwords?!) regarding remote receivers: In a system using remote receivers RF-linked back to a voter at the main site, should each satellite (remote receiver, that is, not orbiting body) strip out and regenerate PL, or is it sufficient to simply let PL pass through and let all decoding occur at the main site? Assume flat audio throughout. Tnx es 73 de Bob K5IQ Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Receivers and Optimal Use of CTCSS
Definately,single point decoding is the way to go here,let the remote pass all that it hears and let the decoder and voter sort it out. Also allows the use of multiple tones thru the system instead of being limited to just one. BTDT...73,Lee Bob wrote: Another in my periodic series of questions dealing with best practices (dontcha love bidness buzzwords?!) regarding remote receivers: In a system using remote receivers RF-linked back to a voter at the main site, should each satellite (remote receiver, that is, not orbiting body) strip out and regenerate PL, or is it sufficient to simply let PL pass through and let all decoding occur at the main site? Assume flat audio throughout. Tnx es 73 de Bob K5IQ Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Repeater-Builder] FS: Kathrein 420-449 MHz Omni Antenna
For Sale: One (1) NEW Kathrein UHF commercial grade base/repeater station antenna. This omni-directional Kathrein model K 75 16 22 1 has 7dbi gain in the 420-449 MHz range. This is a 50 ohm, 70 watt, fiberglass model. Type N connector at base. $75 plus actual UPS shipping. For more info, check out the following link: http://www.kathrein.de/de/mca/produkte/download/936074.pdf If interested, please contact off list. Dennis Bridgeman 202 Seventh Street Carmi, Illinois 62821 _ Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need Answers
Well it seems that I am told I have to change frequencies, has it that one of my users interferred with the same troublesome repeater I've had all along, and now the coordinator says I have to move. Not sure how well all the equipment will handle the change. Here is what I have as equipment, and will it all make it there. We are moving from 146.925- to 145.410-, and the expense is the last thing I needed right now. GE MASTR PRO ER41 Receiver Vocom Amp, tuned for 146.925 and then to top if off, I just got the phasing harness for the DB224 and it was cut right for 146.925. My main transmitter is the (no arguements please), Maggorie HiPro transmitter exiting 2 watts to the vocom amp. TX RX Duplexers. How low in frequency will the MASTR Pro go before I loose quality sensitivity, right now, it's about .15 uv with a preamp, and receives excellent. The vocom amp is model #VVC200-2ref and was designed for the 146 Mhz range. I'm sure the duplexers should not be a problem, other than getting them re-tuned. Thoughts! What anger's me the most about this, is that the repeater owner went straight to the coordinator, did not bother to talk with me. I changed the PL of the repeater. Other sad part is, the user that was getting into their system was not getting into the main receiver, but rather a remote site. I wonder how tight his receiver really is, and is it a synthesized radio, or something of quality. Mathew Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Receivers and Optimal Use of CTCSS
If you regenerate PL you will end up with two PL decode time delays, the first at the outlying site, the second at the voter comparator site. Multiple cascaded PL decoders will cause unacceptable pickup delays - figure a worst-case scenario of 2/3 of a second per decoder - do you really want your users to have to squeeze the PTT and have to say to themselves one thousand and one, one thousand and two, OK, now I can talk. Unless you are desperate never put more than one PL decoder between the user and the system transmitter. One of the systems I helped set up used 146-to-420MHz at the outlying sites with the discriminator audio fed to a brick-wall amplitude limiter fed to the link TX modulator. The link RXs were 420MHz Maxtracs. Up to this point in the hardware the entire system was carrier squelch. The main user PL decoder (100hz) was on the voter output and fed the PL decode line of the repeater controller. This way if you came up with 100hz any RX would work. Later the individual link Maxtrac RXs were programmed for different PLs and diode OR'ed together with the main user PL decoder. The unique PL tones were intended for the repeater committee members to RX test site coverage with but ended up with the users using them as well. If you came up with, for example, 107.2Hz only link #1 RX would open, or 123.0HZ brought up RX #3, but the OR'ed PL decode lines caused the repeater controller to see a PL decode signal and the system came up. So for the cost of programming the Maxtracs for active-low-PL decode and a few diodes the system had remote system diagnosis... it didn't take knowing the 420mhz link frequencies and a scanner to determine that, for example, the south receiver was numb the end-user could use his HT with the proper unique PL tone and see how quieting they were. Mike WA6ILQ At 03:00 PM 2/23/05, you wrote: Definately,single point decoding is the way to go here,let the remote pass all that it hears and let the decoder and voter sort it out. Also allows the use of multiple tones thru the system instead of being limited to just one. BTDT...73,Lee Bob wrote: Another in my periodic series of questions dealing with best practices (dontcha love bidness buzzwords?!) regarding remote receivers: In a system using remote receivers RF-linked back to a voter at the main site, should each satellite (remote receiver, that is, not orbiting body) strip out and regenerate PL, or is it sufficient to simply let PL pass through and let all decoding occur at the main site? Assume flat audio throughout. Tnx es 73 de Bob K5IQ Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Repeater-Builder] Packet over voice repeater
I'm looking for a simple way to repeat packets heard on a VHF frequency and retransmit on UHF (and vice versa) I don't want to set it up as a digipeater. Just a simple audio, what goes in one end goes out the other audio repeater. It would be a simple task just to hook up two radios as a cross band repeater, but COR-PTT response time will lop off first few bytes of data. I have considered using a digital delay circuit to delay AF until such time as transmitter comes up to full power, and I've also considered a using a pair of TNC's connected to PC comm ports, and delaying read of receive comm port buffer by enough time to allow transmitter to come up to full power. But before I do anything, I wanted to see if anyone else has had any luck with other ideas, before I reinvent the wheel. Thanks in advance ... - Original Message - From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 8:48 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Digest Number 2989 There are 16 messages in this issue. Topics in this digest: 1. Re: Choosing Commercial UHF Repeater From: Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2. Zetron 38Max Question From: bretb9 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3. Comm Spec TP-38 From: Brent [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4. Re: Zetron 38Max Question From: XE2SI [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5. Re: Kenwood TRK-820 info? From: Mike Morris WA6ILQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6. Re: Re: M2 CAS From: Fred Seamans [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7. Re: Re: M2 CAS From: Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8. Remote Receivers and Optimal Use of CTCSS From: Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9. Re: Remote Receivers and Optimal Use of CTCSS From: Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10. Re: Re: M2 CAS From: Fred Seamans [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11. Re: Comm Spec TP-38 From: skipp025 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12. RE: Re: Comm Spec TP-38 From: Rogers, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13. Re: tpl amps, not so broad-band From: skipp025 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14. FS Kenwood TK-840 K3 403-430mhz NIB From: na6df [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15. Re: FS Kenwood TK-840 K3 403-430mhz NIB From: Ken Arck [EMAIL PROTECTED] 16. Re: Re: Comm Spec TP-38 From: Brent [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: 1 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:34:22 -0800 From: Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Choosing Commercial UHF Repeater Perhaps the best answer is to see what the public-safety agencies use at sites with several dozen UHF repeaters within a few hundred meters. In my area of Central California, the most common repeaters are Motorola Quantar and MTR2000, or Kenwood TKR-840. The brand of the repeater used is driven by the brand of mobile and portable radios being used, since a Kenwood mobile radio will not mute quietly on a Motorola repeater, and (except for the Professional Series radios) vice-versa. While many GE, Vertex, and Icom radios will mute quietly on a Kenwood repeater, that is not a given. While selecting top-quality equipment is important, there is a great deal of engineering that must go into the design of a repeater at a dense site. Logical placement of antennas is important; you don't want to put your antenna right next to an antenna that has a harmonic or subharmonic relationship to yours. My personal preference is to use large-diameter cavity bandpass filters on both RX and TX, double or triple ferrite circulators on TX, and nothing but double-shielded cable or hardline throughout. The Number One Rule is that nothing but an on-frequency signal can get into my receiver, and nothing but an on-frequency signal leaves my transmitter. In an ideal world, all of the repeaters at a dense site would be designed to follow this Rule. Alas, such is not the case... 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY mbloom0947 wrote: I suspect that many of the participants here have had experience selecting UHF repeaters for high-RF applications such as at broadcasting sites. Which would you buy and why? Yaesu/Vertex, ICOM, Kenwood, or some Motorola type? At present I am using a pair of Moto GM300s with a RICK controller. Yahoo! Groups Links Message: 2 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 03:56:18 - From: bretb9 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Zetron 38Max Question Hello, I picked up a Zetron 38 Max repeater controller at a hamfest and the seller did not know the password. The default does not work. Is there a hardware reset I can perform to reset to default values ? I am accessing
Re: [Repeater-Builder] Packet over voice repeater
You're talking about (if I'm not mistaken) 1200 and 1800 Hz signals - well within the voice passband of any repeater. A properly set up standard repeater will pass packet fine. Your larger issue may be key-up delays. Still, a good digital voice delay should do the trick, but I've not done that part and don't know how well they will handle packet data. Joe M. Robert Purvis wrote: I'm looking for a simple way to repeat packets heard on a VHF frequency and retransmit on UHF (and vice versa) I don't want to set it up as a digipeater. Just a simple audio, what goes in one end goes out the other audio repeater. It would be a simple task just to hook up two radios as a cross band repeater, but COR-PTT response time will lop off first few bytes of data. I have considered using a digital delay circuit to delay AF until such time as transmitter comes up to full power, and I've also considered a using a pair of TNC's connected to PC comm ports, and delaying read of receive comm port buffer by enough time to allow transmitter to come up to full power. But before I do anything, I wanted to see if anyone else has had any luck with other ideas, before I reinvent the wheel. Thanks in advance ... - Original Message - From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 8:48 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Digest Number 2989 There are 16 messages in this issue. Topics in this digest: 1. Re: Choosing Commercial UHF Repeater From: Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2. Zetron 38Max Question From: bretb9 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3. Comm Spec TP-38 From: Brent [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4. Re: Zetron 38Max Question From: XE2SI [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5. Re: Kenwood TRK-820 info? From: Mike Morris WA6ILQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6. Re: Re: M2 CAS From: Fred Seamans [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7. Re: Re: M2 CAS From: Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8. Remote Receivers and Optimal Use of CTCSS From: Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9. Re: Remote Receivers and Optimal Use of CTCSS From: Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10. Re: Re: M2 CAS From: Fred Seamans [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11. Re: Comm Spec TP-38 From: skipp025 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12. RE: Re: Comm Spec TP-38 From: Rogers, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13. Re: tpl amps, not so broad-band From: skipp025 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14. FS Kenwood TK-840 K3 403-430mhz NIB From: na6df [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15. Re: FS Kenwood TK-840 K3 403-430mhz NIB From: Ken Arck [EMAIL PROTECTED] 16. Re: Re: Comm Spec TP-38 From: Brent [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: 1 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:34:22 -0800 From: Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Choosing Commercial UHF Repeater Perhaps the best answer is to see what the public-safety agencies use at sites with several dozen UHF repeaters within a few hundred meters. In my area of Central California, the most common repeaters are Motorola Quantar and MTR2000, or Kenwood TKR-840. The brand of the repeater used is driven by the brand of mobile and portable radios being used, since a Kenwood mobile radio will not mute quietly on a Motorola repeater, and (except for the Professional Series radios) vice-versa. While many GE, Vertex, and Icom radios will mute quietly on a Kenwood repeater, that is not a given. While selecting top-quality equipment is important, there is a great deal of engineering that must go into the design of a repeater at a dense site. Logical placement of antennas is important; you don't want to put your antenna right next to an antenna that has a harmonic or subharmonic relationship to yours. My personal preference is to use large-diameter cavity bandpass filters on both RX and TX, double or triple ferrite circulators on TX, and nothing but double-shielded cable or hardline throughout. The Number One Rule is that nothing but an on-frequency signal can get into my receiver, and nothing but an on-frequency signal leaves my transmitter. In an ideal world, all of the repeaters at a dense site would be designed to follow this Rule. Alas, such is not the case... 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY mbloom0947 wrote: I suspect that many of the participants here have had experience selecting UHF repeaters for high-RF applications such as at broadcasting sites. Which would you buy and why? Yaesu/Vertex, ICOM, Kenwood, or some Motorola type? At present I am using a pair of Moto GM300s with a RICK controller. Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [Repeater-Builder] FS: Kathrein 420-449 MHz Omni Antenna
if you haven'tsold it yet, I'll buy it, Roger Hansen W6TOZ Auburn, WA 98092 Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Repeater-Builder] Heliax Transmission Line
Could anybody out here give an estimate price on 100ft of the Heliax cable 7/8 LDFA5-50 and a good site to oder from. Thanks Will / W4WWM Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Repeater-Builder] Re: Remote Receivers and Optimal Use of CTCSS
My thanks to all for the input! Our club repeater (W5UK/R 444.2) is currently a Mitrek converted to repeater service with a homebrew WB2WHC voter (GE MDX as 2nd rcvr). The plan is to recycle the homebrew voter to our 6M machine and replace it with a pre-made multi-channel unit (probably the LDG since the budget is tight). We'll use MDX's (gotta shelf-full) as voter rcvrs and Mitreks (another shelf-full) for the remote links. As I said before, we'll run flat audio throughout; I'm currently building limiter boards for the main repeater and the links. Our geography here is flat, flat, flat and the repeater is mounted 500' up the WWL-TV tower, so we're hoping that with a boost of output power (currently only ~20 watts) and some strategically place satellite rcvrs, we can solidly cover the metro New Orleans area and get rid some problem spots. Again, thanks for all the expertise! 73 de K5IQ Bob Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Repeater-Builder] Sinclair duplexor question
Am tuning a Q202G duplexor up. It was originally set up for the 161 meg range. They appear to tune down to the ham bands but do not like the transmitter loss. Over 2 db. The manual from the site does not say anything about harness lengths. Do I need to change the harness or anything else? -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005 Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] FS: Kathrein 420-449 MHz Omni Antenna
Sold to me, I hope! ! ! Roger Hansen, W6TOZ Auburn, WA Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
RE: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need Answers
The Master Pro RX will work fine down there. We used to use a Master Pro repeater for a 144/145 split repeater without any problems. Ralph W4XE -Original Message- From: w9mwq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 5:47 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need Answers Not sure how well all the equipment will handle the change. Here is what I have as equipment, and will it all make it there. We are moving from 146.925- to 145.410-, and the expense is the last thing I needed right now. GE MASTR PRO ER41 Receiver How low in frequency will the MASTR Pro go before I loose quality sensitivity, right now, it's about .15 uv with a preamp, and receives excellent. The vocom amp is model #VVC200-2ref and was designed for the 146 Mhz range. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] Sinclair duplexer question
John, In order to convert your Q202G duplexer to 2m, you must change the cable harness. The loop assemblies are identical for the two versions, only the harness is different. Of course, the loops and the notch capacitors must all be adjusted when the longer harness is installed, and this is best done on a network analyzer. The standard harness for the 150-174 MHz band measures about 12 between the centers of the cavity tee connectors. The harness for the 138-150 MHz band measures about 14 between centers. You can purchase the low-split harness directly from Sinclair for about $120. Visit www.sinctech.com for more information. Be forewarned: Not all of the Sinclair sales staff is aware that there exists a low-split harness. You simply cannot tune a Q202G duplexer into the 2m band without the longer-lead harness. 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY John Place wrote: Am tuning a Q202G duplexer up. It was originally set up for the 161 meg range. They appear to tune down to the ham bands but do not like the transmitter loss. Over 2 dB. The manual from the site does not say anything about harness lengths. Do I need to change the harness or anything else? Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need Answers
Thanks Ralph, appreciate it. I figure it would, it was the least of my worries, now for the word on the vocom amp and then antenna. Mathew -Original Message- From: Ralph Hogan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 7:42 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need Answers The Master Pro RX will work fine down there. We used to use a Master Pro repeater for a 144/145 split repeater without any problems. Ralph W4XE -Original Message- From: w9mwq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 5:47 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need Answers Not sure how well all the equipment will handle the change. Here is what I have as equipment, and will it all make it there. We are moving from 146.925- to 145.410-, and the expense is the last thing I needed right now. GE MASTR PRO ER41 Receiver How low in frequency will the MASTR Pro go before I loose quality sensitivity, right now, it's about .15 uv with a preamp, and receives excellent. The vocom amp is model #VVC200-2ref and was designed for the 146 Mhz range. Yahoo! Groups Links -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 2/22/2005 Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need Answers
Hello Matthew - I am curious if you could give me the call or the location of the other repeater in relation to where you are. I also have a repeater on 146.925 and am only curious if your complaining party might be one that I have heard going ballistic when the band opens slightly and they start getting interference. The one I'm referring to uses no P.L. at all. Dave / NOATH Original Message - From: Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 9:46 PM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Going got Rough, Forced to change Freq, Need Answers Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Repeater-Builder] Cleaning out the Shack.
For Sale: NHRC-10 repeater controller with NHRC 10-CAB cabinet and NHRC 10-DOUT 8 channel digital output board, latest firmware. More information can be found at www.nhrc.net/nhrc-10/index.php Asking $500.00 Or Make Offer NHRC-3 Repeater controller, more information can be found at www.nhrc.net/nhrc-3/ This controller has been sitting around for many years and was working when it was taken out and replaced by the NHRC-10 Above. This controller has the 90 seconds of voice storage. Make Offer. Cat-200B Repeater controller. Unit was briefly in service and worked well but I was not happy with the command structure and replaced it with an easier to use controller. This unit comes with the Rack Mount Enclosure. More information can be found at www.catauto.com/cat200.html Make Offer Tenma 72-585 RF Generator. Comes with power cable and bnc to alligator clip cable. This unit is in good working order. Make Offer. Tektronix Oscilloscope model 2213 Duel Channel, 60 Mhz. Comes with Three probes 2-Tektronix Probes (Unknown model numbers both work) and one B+K Precision PR 31 and a power cord. Both the Operators manual and Service Manual are included. This unit is in perfect working order. More Information can be found here www.tucker.com/images/images_spec/1068.pdf Asking $550.00 or make offer. No Reasonable offers will be refused. Shipping will be discussed in private email. PayPal is my preferred method of payment but others can be discussed If you are interested please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please ask questions so that we will both be happy with the sale/purchase. 73 Ray K6PNG Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
