Re: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-06 Thread Eric Lemmon
Let's not forget that most PAs are powered continuously, and it is the
exciter that is keyed on and off.  Any signal that mixes in the PA will
likely be amplified at full power, regardless of whether the transmitter
is on or not.  In order to prevent this from happening, it is
sometimes necessary to use the belt-and-suspenders approach:  A dual
circulator, followed by a sharply-tuned bandpass cavity or two, between
the PA and the duplexer TX port.  This combination limits most incoming
signals to a narrow band that can be diverted into the load by the
circulator.  The common bandpass/bandreject (BpBr) duplexers have almost
no bandpass selectivity, so this must be provided by separate
bandpass-only cavities.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

Someone wrote:

...What bothers me here about using a circulator is that you say it only
occurs when your TX is active. This doesn't sound like IM to me, as that
would occur regardless of whether the tx was active or not (IM is
produced
 when external RF comes down the TX line and mixes in the PA stages. This does 
 NOT require that the PA actually be making power)...




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-06 Thread Bob Dengler
At 5/5/2004 05:34 PM, you wrote:
Let's not forget that most PAs are powered continuously, and it is the
exciter that is keyed on and off.  Any signal that mixes in the PA will
likely be amplified at full power, regardless of whether the transmitter
is on or not.

If the (class C) PA isn't being driven by the exciter, the devices will be 
off.  In that condition, it would be rather difficult for a low-level 
signal (milliwatt or less) to drive the collector of an RF power transistor 
hard enough to cause mixing.  Most all of your problems will be with your 
TX on.

   In order to prevent this from happening, it is
sometimes necessary to use the belt-and-suspenders approach:  A dual
circulator, followed by a sharply-tuned bandpass cavity or two, between
the PA and the duplexer TX port.  This combination limits most incoming
signals to a narrow band that can be diverted into the load by the
circulator.  The common bandpass/bandreject (BpBr) duplexers have almost
no bandpass selectivity, so this must be provided by separate
bandpass-only cavities.

This is all good, though a dual isolator is overkill unless you have 
in-band transmitters close to your TX freq. at your site.  The bandpass 
cavity(ies) is(are) probably the most overlooked component in a clean, 
neighborly system.

Bob NO6B






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-06 Thread Charles Miller
With this explanation I would agree. It does sound like something on the
tower. I thought, It could, not likely, be in one of the 800 transmitters. I
have seen this before, and it was very strange signal. Broadband, covered
most of the 130-170 MHz range, and had little birdies every 15-30 KHz
ranging from -110dBm to -90dBm.

Good Luck, and I would start looking at the tower...

Charles Miller

- Original Message - 
From: Richard Sharp, KQ4KX [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 9:35 AM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue


 Well, I considered that too.  However, after further study of isolators
(and
 discussing my situation with a manufacturer of isolators) I discovered
that
 a VHF isolator will not stop signals in the 800MHz range from passing
 through it.  An isolator should work great if I was dealing with several
VHF
 transmitters at the same level on the tower.

 I'm wondering if the IMD is being generated somewhere on the tower,
 antenna(s), etc.?  A bandpass cavity on the tx drops the 800MHz signal
 levels (as seen at the tx port) from -40dBm to -75dBm.  I would think
levels
 of -75dBm shouldn't be a problem for the 2m tx?  The harmonic filter in
 the tx should drop the -75 to nearly nothing - right?  That's why I'm
 thinking perhaps the IMD is being generated somewhere else.  Although, it
 does only occur when the 2m tx is on.

 tnx
 Richard


  -Original Message-
  From: Charles Miller
 
  Richard,
 
  You said that the IMD is only there when YOUR TX in on. If this
  is the case
  you may need an Isolator for your TX. I had a site that was getting eat
  alive with IMD at 150 MHz only when the TX was on. Found out that the
IMD
  was being generated in the transmitter. Put an isolator on the
  thing and no
  more IMD.
 
  Just a thought 8-)
 
  Charles Miller
 
  - Original Message -
 
  [snip]
   I can see carriers appear and disappear on the rx side when the
  tx is on.
  [snip]
 
 






 Yahoo! Groups Links












 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-06 Thread Tony Faiola
John Lloyd wrote:
 
 Several years ago, I had a similar problem with AM stations 1510 and 910
 that were 600 khz apart. They were both about 5 miles away from our
 repeater. Our 146.94 repeater when it keyed up was hearing the audio
 combination of both AM transmitters that were on during the day. The
 problem went away at sundown when the one AM station went off the air
 and returned the next morning at sunrise when it came back on.
 
 We traced the IMD mix point to a guy wire anchor plate on a nearby 120
 ft tower that was rusty and it wasn't even galvanized! We solved the
 problem by adding wire jumpers with cable clamps from each guy wire to
 the anchor rod which shorted out the diode action of the rusty anchor
 plate.
 
 John, K7JL

John:

We had a very similar problem in the Washington, D.C. area with our
147.00/146.40 repeater, however it was a 160 Meter dipole off the 200
foot self supporting tower about 30 to 40 feet from the duplexed
repeater antenna.

We raised and lowered the dipole for experimentation purposes while all
were listening to duplicate the problem.  All listening appreciated the
education from it. You could hear the stronger of the two AM stations
come and go as we raised and lowered the dipole.

We went to remote receive sites instead of a duplexed repeater and never
looked back!

Tony, K3WX




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-05 Thread Eric Lemmon
Richard,

That's exactly what I would do:  Lower the antenna, out of the intense
RF field.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

 Richard Sharp, KQ4KX wrote:

Our club was allowed space (no cost) on top of a 400' tower using an
existing 7/8 line... At the top of this tower is also six other
transmit antennas that are for 800MHz trunk systems.  A total of 30
channels...  Of course, these antennas are in the same horizontal plane
with the 2m antenna... I'm thinking of just moving the antenna about 50'
down the tower (where there's no other antennas mounted) to eliminate
the problem...  Any thoughts?




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-05 Thread Steve S. Bosshard \(NU5D\)
It would be nice to run an intermod program to see if any combination of
800 channels produced a 'hit' near the 2M input.

Ssb







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-05 Thread Bryan . Dorbert





Hello 
Richard,
 Have you tried an additional cavity in the rx path? I had a 
similar situation with a UHF repeater and 800 mhz systems and anadditional 
cavity worked for my problem. Also, do you have a preamp? If so, where in the rx 
path is it? You should have all the filtering ahead of the 
preamp.

73,
Bryan

  -Original Message-From: Richard Sharp, KQ4KX 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 8:04 
  PMTo: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com; 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater 
  IMD issue
  Hi 
  gang,
  
  Our club was 
  allowed space (no cost) on top of a 400' tower using an existing 7/8" 
  line. The existing UHF antenna was replaced (by the club) with a PD220-2 
  (142~150 range) antenna. The coverage is very good. However, on 
  occasion when users with HTs or during a squelch tail the IMD is 
  audible. I have added cavity filters to both the rx  tx and the IMD 
  is still there. I've looked at it with a spectrum analyzer (connected to 
  the rx port of the duplexer) and I do see IMD when the 2m repeater's tx is 
  on. Although, since I have the cavity filters inline the IMD is only 
  noticeable within the passband of the rx cavity. The IMD levels are 
  around -90dBm give or take a couple.
  
  Ok, here's the 
  source of the IMD. At the top of this tower is also six other transmit 
  antennas that are for 800MHz trunk systems. A total of 30 
  channels. The top platform is rather large but the closest 800 antenna 
  to the 2m antenna is about5 feet. The farthest is about 12 
  feet. Of course, these antennas are in the same horizontal plane with 
  the 2m antenna.
  
  Signal levels in 
  the 800 tx band that I see at the TX or RX port of the 2m duplexer without the 
  bandpass cavity is about -40dBm. With the cavity about 
  -75dBm.
  
  I'm thinking of 
  just moving the antenna about 50' down the tower (where there's no other 
  antennas mounted) to eliminate the problem. My thinking is that with the 
  extreme RF levels present on the top platform that I'd have to spend a fortune 
  in filters on the 2m equipment  perhaps the 800 stuff that it'd just be 
  cheaper to move the antenna from the top. Any 
  thoughts?
  
  I was looking into 
  a solution using anisolator but after further research I discovered that 
  a VHF isolator will ALLOW RF into the 2m transmitter that is in the 800MHz 
  range. With the bandpass cavity inline there's noVHF (150~160) or 
  UHF (450~470)signalsthat show up on the spectrum analyzer. 
  Only the co-site 800MHz stuff is getting through the 
  cavity.
  
  
  Richard













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










RE: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-05 Thread Richard Sharp, KQ4KX





Bryan,

No, I 
don't have a preamp in the circuit - it would only make things WORSE. 
Well, when I add additional cavities it doesn't get rid of the IMD because it's 
being generated somewhere else. When I'm not using a cavity the IMD is all 
over the VHF band at about -90dBm. However, when the cavity is inline the 
IMD is only visible within the passband of the rx cavity. But it's still 
there - on channel basically. I can see carriers appear and disappear on 
the rx side when the tx is on. I'm thinking that maybe the IMD is being 
generated on the tower somewhere. All is the same when I have a bandpass 
cavity on the tx side too. Man, the 800 signals are HUGE up 
there! All the 800 antennas are the Celwave "Penetrator" antennas. 
You know, the ones that are 23ft tall and8 inches diameter, 12 - 15dB 
gain.

Richard



  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Hello Richard,
   Have you tried an additional cavity in the rx path? I had 
  a similar situation with a UHF repeater and 800 mhz systems and 
  anadditional cavity worked for my problem. Also, do you have a preamp? 
  If so, where in the rx path is it? You should have all the filtering ahead of 
  the preamp.
  
  73,
  Bryan
  













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-05 Thread Charles Miller
Richard,

You said that the IMD is only there when YOUR TX in on. If this is the case
you may need an Isolator for your TX. I had a site that was getting eat
alive with IMD at 150 MHz only when the TX was on. Found out that the IMD
was being generated in the transmitter. Put an isolator on the thing and no
more IMD.

Just a thought 8-)

Charles Miller

- Original Message - 

[snip]
 I can see carriers appear and disappear on the rx side when the tx is on.
[snip]






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-05 Thread Virden Clark Beckman
I am suprised 800 will show passing thru in highband cavities, I would
think moving down one rack is the smartest thing to try, as you noted it
will be a low cost trial.

 Richard Sharp, KQ4KX wrote:
 
 Hi gang,
 
 Our club was allowed space (no cost) on top of a 400' tower using an
 existing 7/8 line.  The existing UHF antenna was replaced (by the
 club) with a PD220-2 (142~150 range) antenna.  The coverage is very
 good.  However, on occasion when users with HTs or during a squelch
 tail the IMD is audible.  I have added cavity filters to both the rx 
 tx and the IMD is still there.  I've looked at it with a spectrum
 analyzer (connected to the rx port of the duplexer) and I do see IMD
 when the 2m repeater's tx is on.  Although, since I have the cavity
 filters inline the IMD is only noticeable within the passband of the
 rx cavity.  The IMD levels are around -90dBm give or take a couple.
 
 Ok, here's the source of the IMD.  At the top of this tower is also
 six other transmit antennas that are for 800MHz trunk systems.  A
 total of 30 channels.  The top platform is rather large but the
 closest 800 antenna to the 2m antenna is about 5 feet.  The farthest
 is about 12 feet.  Of course, these antennas are in the same
 horizontal plane with the 2m antenna.
 
 Signal levels in the 800 tx band that I see at the TX or RX port of
 the 2m duplexer without the bandpass cavity is about -40dBm.  With the
 cavity about -75dBm.
 
 I'm thinking of just moving the antenna about 50' down the tower
 (where there's no other antennas mounted) to eliminate the problem.
 My thinking is that with the extreme RF levels present on the top
 platform that I'd have to spend a fortune in filters on the 2m
 equipment  perhaps the 800 stuff that it'd just be cheaper to move
 the antenna from the top.  Any thoughts?
 
 I was looking into a solution using an isolator but after further
 research I discovered that a VHF isolator will ALLOW RF into the 2m
 transmitter that is in the 800MHz range.  With the bandpass cavity
 inline there's no VHF (150~160) or UHF (450~470) signals that show up
 on the spectrum analyzer.  Only the co-site 800MHz stuff is getting
 through the cavity.
 
 
 Richard
 
 

-- 
73...Clark Beckman N8PZD




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-05 Thread Richard Sharp, KQ4KX
Well, I considered that too.  However, after further study of isolators (and
discussing my situation with a manufacturer of isolators) I discovered that
a VHF isolator will not stop signals in the 800MHz range from passing
through it.  An isolator should work great if I was dealing with several VHF
transmitters at the same level on the tower.

I'm wondering if the IMD is being generated somewhere on the tower,
antenna(s), etc.?  A bandpass cavity on the tx drops the 800MHz signal
levels (as seen at the tx port) from -40dBm to -75dBm.  I would think levels
of -75dBm shouldn't be a problem for the 2m tx?  The harmonic filter in
the tx should drop the -75 to nearly nothing - right?  That's why I'm
thinking perhaps the IMD is being generated somewhere else.  Although, it
does only occur when the 2m tx is on.

tnx
Richard


 -Original Message-
 From: Charles Miller

 Richard,

 You said that the IMD is only there when YOUR TX in on. If this
 is the case
 you may need an Isolator for your TX. I had a site that was getting eat
 alive with IMD at 150 MHz only when the TX was on. Found out that the IMD
 was being generated in the transmitter. Put an isolator on the
 thing and no
 more IMD.

 Just a thought 8-)

 Charles Miller

 - Original Message -

 [snip]
  I can see carriers appear and disappear on the rx side when the
 tx is on.
 [snip]







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-05 Thread Gregg Lengling
Proper engineering also requires a Low Pass filter when installing an
isolator, this will restrict any incoming frequencies above your operating
frequency...although this is not the reason for the low pass filter...it is
there to protect you from radiating any mixes at higher frequencies.


Gregg R. Lengling, W9DHI, Retired
Administrator http://www.milwaukeehdtv.org
K2/100 S#3075 KX1 S# 57
Politics is the art of appearing candid and completely open, while
concealing as much as possible.   -States: The Bene Gesserit View
 


-Original Message-
From: Richard Sharp, KQ4KX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 9:35 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

Well, I considered that too.  However, after further study of isolators (and
discussing my situation with a manufacturer of isolators) I discovered that
a VHF isolator will not stop signals in the 800MHz range from passing
through it.  An isolator should work great if I was dealing with several VHF
transmitters at the same level on the tower.

I'm wondering if the IMD is being generated somewhere on the tower,
antenna(s), etc.?  A bandpass cavity on the tx drops the 800MHz signal
levels (as seen at the tx port) from -40dBm to -75dBm.  I would think levels
of -75dBm shouldn't be a problem for the 2m tx?  The harmonic filter in
the tx should drop the -75 to nearly nothing - right?  That's why I'm
thinking perhaps the IMD is being generated somewhere else.  Although, it
does only occur when the 2m tx is on.

tnx
Richard


 -Original Message-
 From: Charles Miller

 Richard,

 You said that the IMD is only there when YOUR TX in on. If this
 is the case
 you may need an Isolator for your TX. I had a site that was getting eat
 alive with IMD at 150 MHz only when the TX was on. Found out that the IMD
 was being generated in the transmitter. Put an isolator on the
 thing and no
 more IMD.

 Just a thought 8-)

 Charles Miller

 - Original Message -

 [snip]
  I can see carriers appear and disappear on the rx side when the
 tx is on.
 [snip]







 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-05 Thread Ken Arck
At 10:35 AM 5/5/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Well, I considered that too.  However, after further study of isolators (and
discussing my situation with a manufacturer of isolators) I discovered that
a VHF isolator will not stop signals in the 800MHz range from passing
through it.  An isolator should work great if I was dealing with several VHF
transmitters at the same level on the tower.

---What bothers me here about using a circulator is that you say it only
occurs when your TX is active. This doesn't sound like IM to me, as that
would occur regardless of whether the tx was active or not (IM is produced
when external RF comes down the TX line and mixes in the PA stages. This
does NOT require that the PA actually be making power). 

It sounds more like a classic case of mixing. Have you run all the freqs
involved to see where the possibles might be?

Ken
--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
Be sure to see our products at this year's Dayton Hamvention!
Repeater Builders spaces 707 through 710
AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
http://www.irlp.net




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-05 Thread Mark Tomany
Maybe I'm taking to simple of a view, but could this be some sort of
harmonic?  However, if my math is correct (and it usually isn't... :-p )
that would be about a 4th order harmonic, I think.  (If that's even
possible.)  Or am I all wet?

Mark - N9WYS


-Original Message-
From: Richard Sharp, KQ4KX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 9:35 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

Well, I considered that too.  However, after further study of isolators (and
discussing my situation with a manufacturer of isolators) I discovered that
a VHF isolator will not stop signals in the 800MHz range from passing
through it.  An isolator should work great if I was dealing with several VHF
transmitters at the same level on the tower.

I'm wondering if the IMD is being generated somewhere on the tower,
antenna(s), etc.?  A bandpass cavity on the tx drops the 800MHz signal
levels (as seen at the tx port) from -40dBm to -75dBm.  I would think levels
of -75dBm shouldn't be a problem for the 2m tx?  The harmonic filter in
the tx should drop the -75 to nearly nothing - right?  That's why I'm
thinking perhaps the IMD is being generated somewhere else.  Although, it
does only occur when the 2m tx is on.

tnx
Richard


 -Original Message-
 From: Charles Miller

 Richard,

 You said that the IMD is only there when YOUR TX in on. If this
 is the case
 you may need an Isolator for your TX. I had a site that was getting eat
 alive with IMD at 150 MHz only when the TX was on. Found out that the IMD
 was being generated in the transmitter. Put an isolator on the
 thing and no
 more IMD.

 Just a thought 8-)

 Charles Miller

 - Original Message -

 [snip]
  I can see carriers appear and disappear on the rx side when the
 tx is on.
 [snip]








Yahoo! Groups Links









 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-05 Thread Richard Sharp, KQ4KX
 -Original Message-
 From: Ken Arck

 ---What bothers me here about using a circulator is that you say it only
 occurs when your TX is active. This doesn't sound like IM to me, as that
 would occur regardless of whether the tx was active or not (IM is produced
 when external RF comes down the TX line and mixes in the PA stages. This
 does NOT require that the PA actually be making power).

Good point.  Yes, it only occurs when the 2m repeaters tx is on.  Basically,
what I see on the spectrum analyzer (connected to the rx port of the
duplexer) is several signals coming and going within the passband of the rx
cavity (+/- 300kHz approx).  I can tune the analyzer to a specific carrier
and hear either voice traffic or control channel.  All of these signals are
around -90dBm at the rx port.  As soon as the 2m transmitter is turned off
the carriers on the rx port disappear.


 It sounds more like a classic case of mixing. Have you run all the freqs
 involved to see where the possibles might be?

At this point no.  However, I'm in the process of obtaining all of the 800
freqs to do a calc.





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-05 Thread Steve Grantham
This may not exactly fit the circumstances of the current thread.
However...

I was getting 800 MHz trunking interference on my 447.200 repeater receiver
some years ago.  I was using a WP 678- R2 duplexer and a Hamtronics LNG-450
preamp on an Exec II.  The thing was, there were no 800 MHz station
transmitters within five miles of the repeater site.  Anyway, it seems that
enough of the 800 MHz signals made it through the duplexer pass cavities to
cause mixing in the preamp.  In the end, the Exec II was really sensitive
enough standing alone.  I also once knew a fellow who used an LNG-450 on one
of his MASTR Pro 460 MHz community repeaters. He had interference from a
co-located two-meter repeater.  In the end, the ham repeater had to go away.
For him, that was more economical from both a time and expense standpoint
than solving the problem otherwise.

The bottom line is.. Where preamps are concerned..  Caveat Emptor!

Steve, AA5SG

- Original Message - 
From: Richard Sharp, KQ4KX [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 10:01 AM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue


  -Original Message-
  From: Ken Arck
 
  ---What bothers me here about using a circulator is that you say it
only
  occurs when your TX is active. This doesn't sound like IM to me, as that
  would occur regardless of whether the tx was active or not (IM is
produced
  when external RF comes down the TX line and mixes in the PA stages. This
  does NOT require that the PA actually be making power).

 Good point.  Yes, it only occurs when the 2m repeaters tx is on.
Basically,
 what I see on the spectrum analyzer (connected to the rx port of the
 duplexer) is several signals coming and going within the passband of the
rx
 cavity (+/- 300kHz approx).  I can tune the analyzer to a specific carrier
 and hear either voice traffic or control channel.  All of these signals
are
 around -90dBm at the rx port.  As soon as the 2m transmitter is turned off
 the carriers on the rx port disappear.

 
  It sounds more like a classic case of mixing. Have you run all the freqs
  involved to see where the possibles might be?

 At this point no.  However, I'm in the process of obtaining all of the 800
 freqs to do a calc.






 Yahoo! Groups Links












 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-05 Thread Steve Bosshard
Duplexers with one loop in UHF do not do much at 800 Mhz - have 4
repeaters with WP678's on 2 antennas, abt 10 ft from 800 SMR transmit
antenna - horizontal - ended up placing decibel band pass 2 loop cans in
front of each receiver - to keep 800 from really desensensing the 460
recs.  Uniden 460 LTR system and Johnson 800 VX trunking systems on the
Alico Building in Waco, TX.

Ssb








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-05 Thread Ken Arck
At 11:52 AM 5/5/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Duplexers with one loop in UHF do not do much at 800 Mhz -

---He was talking about VHF circulators not being effective at preventing
800 Mhz energy from passing back down the TX line?

I've never heard of this before.

Ken
--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
Be sure to see our products at this year's Dayton Hamvention!
Repeater Builders spaces 707 through 710
AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
http://www.irlp.net




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-05 Thread Steve Bosshard
Take a tracking generator and sweep a Wacom 678 duplexer and look beyond
440 / 450 on up to 600 and beyond.  If memory is correct a single cavity
will have less than 10 db attenuation at 800.

Ssb








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] 2m repeater IMD issue

2004-05-05 Thread Ken Arck
At 12:34 PM 5/5/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Take a tracking generator and sweep a Wacom 678 duplexer and look beyond
440 / 450 on up to 600 and beyond.  If memory is correct a single cavity
will have less than 10 db attenuation at 800.

---I said CIRCULATOR, not DUPLEXER :-)

Ken
--
President and CTO - Arcom Communications
Makers of state-of-the-art repeater controllers and accessories.
http://www.ah6le.net/arcom/index.html
Be sure to see our products at this year's Dayton Hamvention!
Repeater Builders spaces 707 through 710
AH6LE/R - IRLP Node 3000
http://www.irlp.net




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/