Re: [Repeater-Builder] New Repeater Desense Problems

2008-07-09 Thread wd8chl
Mike Morris WA6ILQ wrote:

 And some evening spend some time reading this:
 http://www.repeater-builder.com/db/db-about-rf-communications.pdf
 Yes, some of the info is 40 years old, but the physics of RF hasn't
 changed.
 
 Mike WA6ILQ

And never will!
At least not until somebody figures out how sub-space communications works!
;cD



RE: [Repeater-Builder] New Repeater Desense Problems

2008-07-09 Thread n9wys
John,

In the cases I have seen, an Iso-Tee is constructed by removing the center 
pin in the offset side of a UHF T connector, grinding it down until it is 
flat with the insulator surface (add a notch so you can re-insert with a 
screwdriver) and reinsert the pin into the connector.  This provides for an 
indirect connection for testing purposes.

The link below describes the theory/practice behind its design and use, 
although the author uses an insulator sleeve around the center pin of his 
connector rather than the design I am familiar with.

http://www.conknet.com/~b_mobile/NoiseStuff.html 

This article describes the design I am familiar with:

http://mrtmag.com/mag/radio_rf_samplers_directional/ 

If you have a Bird wattmeter, you can construct one for use with your meter:

http://www.repeater-builder.com/projects/bird43sampler.html 

Hope this helps!
Mark - N9WYS

-Original Message-
From: John Transue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/07/09 Wed AM 10:06:35 EDT
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: New Repeater Desense Problems

So, please, someone tell me, what is an iso tee/sampler slug? How is the 
equipmenthooked up for the desense test?
 
John



Re: [Repeater-Builder] New Repeater Desense Problems

2008-07-09 Thread william474
Additional accuracy can be obtained by providing a 50 ohm load for the  
generator.  This can be accomplished by connecting the center of the ISO  T 
to 
the center of the unmodified T to form an H configuration.  Then  connect 
the generator to one end of the unmodified T and a 50 ohm load to the  other 
end of the unmodified T.  This allows the generator to see a 50  ohm load. 
 
billb
 
 






Yahoo! Groups  Links








**Get the scoop on last night's hottest shows and the live music 
scene in your area - Check out TourTracker.com!  
(www.tourtracker.com?NCID=aolmus0005000112)


Re: [Repeater-Builder] New Repeater Desense Problems

2008-07-08 Thread Kerincom
Replace the lmr400 with heliax .we hjave had nothing but problems with it 
since changing it to heliax the problem has been cleared up 
 
Thank You,
Ian Wells,
Kerinvale Comaudio,
361 Camboon Road.Biloela.4715
Phone 0749922574 or 0409159932
www.kerinvalecomaudio.com.au
 
---Original Message---
 
From: Bill Wilson
Date: 8/07/2008 10:08:00 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] New Repeater Desense Problems
 
Greetings Group,

I had hoped to be able to purchase off-the-shelf components for a 2 
meter repeater for our local club to use. 

I purchased a Maggoire HiPro R1VHF35, 35 watt version, and with their 
recommendation a set of FiPlex DVN-1533L Duplexers (6 cans). These 
were installed with LMR-400 cabling and a 50 foot run to a Diamond X-
50 Dual Band vertical installed about 40 feet above ground. We have 
a good ground, and the equipment is mounted in an open rack.

The controller is a CAT-250, currently with COR receive only, 
although the CTCSS module is installed but not turned on at this 
time. I have been told however that the PL is being transmitted on 
the transmit signal for decode. I also had the Narrow Band IF Filter 
installed.

Ever since we first hooked everything up, we have had receive desense 
problems. The cans have been retuned 3 times by two different radio 
shops in the area, and the problem still exists. With the exception 
of the duplexer and repeater itself, every other component in the 
system has been swapped out at least once.

One observation by the first radio tech (ham) that came out was 
the very sensitive receiver on the order of 0.10 uv, versus the 
0.20 uv as advertised. On the third tune-up of the duplexers, 
they discovered that the loops were 180 degrees out of phase, and 
when they turned them, the duplexers came right in. However, the 
problem persists. Great for in town use, but that's about it.

We have used varied lengths of cables between the repeater and the 
duplexers, without any significant change in results. Next weekend, 
I am planning on looking at the tuning myself with borrowed test 
equipment. I know what I'm looking for pretty much, and it's got to 
be close to correct to work as it does.

Any thoughts ideas, etc., would be appreciated. 

Bill – KJ4EX


 
 

Re: [Repeater-Builder] New Repeater Desense Problems

2008-07-08 Thread Ron Wright
Bill,

In finding desense first one must locate the problem.  A given.

I would start with putting GOOD dummy load on the duplexer output and do a 
desense test.  This can be done with a local signal gen where you can vary the 
gen output and keying and unkey the transmitter.  You should see no difference 
in the received signal with tx keyed or unkeyed.

If you do then the desense is in the repeater.  Next do the same test with the 
dummy load on the transmtter only.  This will test for the desense being inside 
or outside the radio part of the repeater.

I would look at your LMR400 and antenna.  I think the LMR400 is a double 
shielded cable with different metals for the 2 shields.  This is a no no in 
duplexed system.  It generates noise.  It has been discussed here on this board 
many many times and for good reason.  If this is a problem replace with a good 
heliax.  It is worth the cost.

This is a start.

73, ron, n9ee/r




From: Bill Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/07/06 Sun PM 10:24:30 EDT
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] New Repeater Desense Problems


Greetings Group,

I had hoped to be able to purchase off-the-shelf components for a 2 
meter repeater for our local club to use.  

I purchased a Maggoire HiPro R1VHF35, 35 watt version, and with their 
recommendation a set of FiPlex DVN-1533L Duplexers (6 cans).  These 
were installed with LMR-400 cabling and a 50 foot run to a Diamond X-
50 Dual Band vertical installed about 40 feet above ground.  We have 
a good ground, and the equipment is mounted in an open rack.

The controller is a CAT-250, currently with COR receive only, 
although the CTCSS module is installed but not turned on at this 
time.  I have been told however that the PL is being transmitted on 
the transmit signal for decode.  I also had the Narrow Band IF Filter 
installed.

Ever since we first hooked everything up, we have had receive desense 
problems.  The cans have been retuned 3 times by two different radio 
shops in the area, and the problem still exists.  With the exception 
of the duplexer and repeater itself, every other component in the 
system has been swapped out at least once.

One observation by the first radio tech (ham) that came out was 
the very sensitive receiver on the order of 0.10 uv, versus the 
0.20 uv as advertised.  On the third tune-up of the duplexers, 
they discovered that the loops were 180 degrees out of phase, and 
when they turned them, the duplexers came right in.  However, the 
problem persists.  Great for in town use, but that's about it.

We have used varied lengths of cables between the repeater and the 
duplexers, without any significant change in results.   Next weekend, 
I am planning on looking at the tuning myself with borrowed test 
equipment.  I know what I'm looking for pretty much, and it's got to 
be close to correct to work as it does.

Any thoughts ideas, etc., would be appreciated.   

Bill – KJ4EX

   
 


Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.




Re: [Repeater-Builder] New Repeater Desense Problems

2008-07-08 Thread Steve Bosshard (NU5D)
Don't leave out the isolated TEE between the duplexer and dummy load, 
Ron.  Hi,  Steve NU5D

Ron Wright wrote:
 Bill,

 In finding desense first one must locate the problem.  A given.

 I would start with putting GOOD dummy load on the duplexer output and do a 
 desense test.  This can be done with a local signal gen where you can vary 
 the gen output and keying and unkey the transmitter.  You should see no 
 difference in the received signal with tx keyed or unkeyed.

 If you do then the desense is in the repeater.  Next do the same test with 
 the dummy load on the transmtter only.  This will test for the desense being 
 inside or outside the radio part of the repeater.

 I would look at your LMR400 and antenna.  I think the LMR400 is a double 
 shielded cable with different metals for the 2 shields.  This is a no no in 
 duplexed system.  It generates noise.  It has been discussed here on this 
 board many many times and for good reason.  If this is a problem replace with 
 a good heliax.  It is worth the cost.

 This is a start.

 73, ron, n9ee/r


   
   


Re: [Repeater-Builder] New Repeater Desense Problems

2008-07-08 Thread dmurman
Have you run the repeater into a dummy load and check for desense? 



David

=
From: Bill Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/07/07 Mon AM 02:24:30 WET
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] New Repeater Desense Problems


Greetings Group,

I had hoped to be able to purchase off-the-shelf components for a 2 
meter repeater for our local club to use.  

I purchased a Maggoire HiPro R1VHF35, 35 watt version, and with their 
recommendation a set of FiPlex DVN-1533L Duplexers (6 cans).  These 
were installed with LMR-400 cabling and a 50 foot run to a Diamond X-
50 Dual Band vertical installed about 40 feet above ground.  We have 
a good ground, and the equipment is mounted in an open rack.

The controller is a CAT-250, currently with COR receive only, 
although the CTCSS module is installed but not turned on at this 
time.  I have been told however that the PL is being transmitted on 
the transmit signal for decode.  I also had the Narrow Band IF Filter 
installed.

Ever since we first hooked everything up, we have had receive desense 
problems.  The cans have been retuned 3 times by two different radio 
shops in the area, and the problem still exists.  With the exception 
of the duplexer and repeater itself, every other component in the 
system has been swapped out at least once.

One observation by the first radio tech (ham) that came out was 
the very sensitive receiver on the order of 0.10 uv, versus the 
0.20 uv as advertised.  On the third tune-up of the duplexers, 
they discovered that the loops were 180 degrees out of phase, and 
when they turned them, the duplexers came right in.  However, the 
problem persists.  Great for in town use, but that's about it.

We have used varied lengths of cables between the repeater and the 
duplexers, without any significant change in results.   Next weekend, 
I am planning on looking at the tuning myself with borrowed test 
equipment.  I know what I'm looking for pretty much, and it's got to 
be close to correct to work as it does.

Any thoughts ideas, etc., would be appreciated.   

Bill – KJ4EX






RE: [Repeater-Builder] New Repeater Desense Problems

2008-07-08 Thread de W5DK
Not to hijack the thread, but a dummy load is NOT always a perfect test to 
eliminate the equipment. I think it’s a good start though.

 

I just solved a situation where I had 15 db desense into a 600ft  feedline / 
antenna and ZERO desense into a dummy load. This was using a sample slug ( same 
function as iso tee)in my bird 43 where the feed line attached to the cabinet. 
My assumption that the complete repeater, duplexers, isolator and cables were 
fine into a dummy load led me to look at the hardline and antenna and prepare 
for paying for a climb. Before we could properly test the feedline  and 
antenna, the mastr II PA failed. (VHF) after replacing the amp, the 15 db 
desense problem was gone. So the failing amp liked the dummy load better than 
600ft of 50ohm feedline and antenna . Or some product from the amp excited the 
feedline /antenna to create something on our input. The low level products on 
our input creating the desense were not visible when I had looked at the 
spectral output of the amp before it failed. 

 

Nothing like moving a mobile amp into a continuous duty heat sink, on you 
tailgate, on the 4th of July!

 

73

Don Kirchner W5DK

 

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 9:39 AM
To: Bill Wilson; Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] New Repeater Desense Problems

 

Have you run the repeater into a dummy load and check for desense? 

David

=
From: Bill Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:kj4ex%40yahoo.com 
Date: 2008/07/07 Mon AM 02:24:30 WET
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] New Repeater Desense Problems

Greetings Group,

I had hoped to be able to purchase off-the-shelf components for a 2 
meter repeater for our local club to use. 

I purchased a Maggoire HiPro R1VHF35, 35 watt version, and with their 
recommendation a set of FiPlex DVN-1533L Duplexers (6 cans). These 
were installed with LMR-400 cabling and a 50 foot run to a Diamond X-
50 Dual Band vertical installed about 40 feet above ground. We have 
a good ground, and the equipment is mounted in an open rack.

The controller is a CAT-250, currently with COR receive only, 
although the CTCSS module is installed but not turned on at this 
time. I have been told however that the PL is being transmitted on 
the transmit signal for decode. I also had the Narrow Band IF Filter 
installed.

Ever since we first hooked everything up, we have had receive desense 
problems. The cans have been retuned 3 times by two different radio 
shops in the area, and the problem still exists. With the exception 
of the duplexer and repeater itself, every other component in the 
system has been swapped out at least once.

One observation by the first radio tech (ham) that came out was 
the very sensitive receiver on the order of 0.10 uv, versus the 
0.20 uv as advertised. On the third tune-up of the duplexers, 
they discovered that the loops were 180 degrees out of phase, and 
when they turned them, the duplexers came right in. However, the 
problem persists. Great for in town use, but that's about it.

We have used varied lengths of cables between the repeater and the 
duplexers, without any significant change in results. Next weekend, 
I am planning on looking at the tuning myself with borrowed test 
equipment. I know what I'm looking for pretty much, and it's got to 
be close to correct to work as it does.

Any thoughts ideas, etc., would be appreciated. 

Bill – KJ4EX




 



Re: [Repeater-Builder] New Repeater Desense Problems

2008-07-08 Thread Chuck Kelsey
Just to echo previous comments, the LMR type cable (any cable with aluminum 
foil/braid combination) is suspect. This subject comes up here about every 
other week.

Chuck
WB2EDV


- Original Message - 
From: Bill Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 10:24 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] New Repeater Desense Problems


Greetings Group,

I had hoped to be able to purchase off-the-shelf components for a 2
meter repeater for our local club to use.

I purchased a Maggoire HiPro R1VHF35, 35 watt version, and with their
recommendation a set of FiPlex DVN-1533L Duplexers (6 cans).  These
were installed with LMR-400 cabling and a 50 foot run to a Diamond X-
50 Dual Band vertical installed about 40 feet above ground.  We have
a good ground, and the equipment is mounted in an open rack.

The controller is a CAT-250, currently with COR receive only,
although the CTCSS module is installed but not turned on at this
time.  I have been told however that the PL is being transmitted on
the transmit signal for decode.  I also had the Narrow Band IF Filter
installed.

Ever since we first hooked everything up, we have had receive desense
problems.  The cans have been retuned 3 times by two different radio
shops in the area, and the problem still exists.  With the exception
of the duplexer and repeater itself, every other component in the
system has been swapped out at least once.

One observation by the first radio tech (ham) that came out was
the very sensitive receiver on the order of 0.10 uv, versus the
0.20 uv as advertised.  On the third tune-up of the duplexers,
they discovered that the loops were 180 degrees out of phase, and
when they turned them, the duplexers came right in.  However, the
problem persists.  Great for in town use, but that's about it.

We have used varied lengths of cables between the repeater and the
duplexers, without any significant change in results.   Next weekend,
I am planning on looking at the tuning myself with borrowed test
equipment.  I know what I'm looking for pretty much, and it's got to
be close to correct to work as it does.

Any thoughts ideas, etc., would be appreciated.

Bill - KJ4EX







Yahoo! Groups Links





Re: [Repeater-Builder] New Repeater Desense Problems

2008-07-08 Thread wd8chl
de W5DK wrote:
 Not to hijack the thread, but a dummy load is NOT always a perfect
 test to eliminate the equipment. I think it’s a good start though.
 
 
 
 I just solved a situation where I had 15 db desense into a 600ft
 feedline / antenna and ZERO desense into a dummy load. This was using
 a sample slug ( same function as iso tee)in my bird 43 where the feed
 line attached to the cabinet. My assumption that the complete
 repeater, duplexers, isolator and cables were fine into a dummy load
 led me to look at the hardline and antenna and prepare for paying for
 a climb. Before we could properly test the feedline  and antenna, the
 mastr II PA failed. (VHF) after replacing the amp, the 15 db desense
 problem was gone. So the failing amp liked the dummy load better than
 600ft of 50ohm feedline and antenna . Or some product from the amp
 excited the feedline /antenna to create something on our input. The
 low level products on our input creating the desense were not visible
 when I had looked at the spectral output of the amp before it failed.

It sounds to me like the PA wasn't aligned properly. Or the duplexer is 
not aligned properly. Most, but not all, MastrII PA's have an output 
filter section that is tricky to align correctly.

There is lots of info on it on the repeater-builder web site.







Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Repeater-Builder] New Repeater Desense Problems

2008-07-08 Thread Mike Morris WA6ILQ
At 07:24 PM 07/06/08, you wrote:
Greetings Group,

I had hoped to be able to purchase off-the-shelf components for a 2
meter repeater for our local club to use.

I purchased a Maggoire HiPro R1VHF35, 35 watt version, and with their
recommendation a set of FiPlex DVN-1533L Duplexers (6 cans).  These
were installed with LMR-400 cabling and a 50 foot run to a Diamond X-
50 Dual Band vertical installed about 40 feet above ground.  We have
a good ground, and the equipment is mounted in an open rack.

The controller is a CAT-250, currently with COR receive only,
although the CTCSS module is installed but not turned on at this
time.  I have been told however that the PL is being transmitted on
the transmit signal for decode.  I also had the Narrow Band IF Filter
installed.

Ever since we first hooked everything up, we have had receive desense
problems.  The cans have been retuned 3 times by two different radio
shops in the area, and the problem still exists.  With the exception
of the duplexer and repeater itself, every other component in the
system has been swapped out at least once.

One observation by the first radio tech (ham) that came out was
the very sensitive receiver on the order of 0.10 uv, versus the
0.20 uv as advertised.  On the third tune-up of the duplexers,
they discovered that the loops were 180 degrees out of phase, and
when they turned them, the duplexers came right in.  However, the
problem persists.  Great for in town use, but that's about it.

We have used varied lengths of cables between the repeater and the
duplexers, without any significant change in results.   Next weekend,
I am planning on looking at the tuning myself with borrowed test
equipment.  I know what I'm looking for pretty much, and it's got to
be close to correct to work as it does.

Any thoughts ideas, etc., would be appreciated.

Bill ­ KJ4EX

Who told you to use the LMR coax for duplex use?  Doesn't anybody
read the archives of this group?   There has been at least a dozen
instances over the last few years where people have popped up and
been told that LMR CABLE IS JUNK WHEN USED IN DUPLEX SERVICE.

Go to this page:
http://www.repeater-builder.com/antenna/ant-sys-index.html
Read the 4 paragraphs under System Engineering and also the
second and third articles there.

This is also of interest:
http://www.repeater-builder.com/antenna/andrew-shielding-effectiveness.pdf

As to what cable you should use... it all depends on how well you want
to hear.  Increasing the talk range is easy - how much amplifier and
duplexer can you afford?

The average amateur radio repeater is limited by 
the fact that every user wants
to use a 2w or 4w handheld instead of a 30w of 50w mobile.

If you can't hear them you can't repeat them, so a repeater that has a 1.5db
of feedline loss (100 feet of LMR400 at 2m) from the antenna to the receiver
is not going to hear as well as one that has 
0.5db of loss (100 feet of 7/8 inch
heliax at 2m).   People never seem to think about feedline loss on received
signals...

Look at the bottom third of this page:
http://www.repeater-builder.com/antenna/wa2ise-coaxial-cable.html
and look at the loss per 100 feet. Always favor your receiver. Once
you have lost received signal (i.e. it's down into the noise level) all
the preamps do is bring up the noise.

This is also of interest:
http://www.coasteltools.com/tech_cable_db_loss.htm

And some evening spend some time reading this:
http://www.repeater-builder.com/db/db-about-rf-communications.pdf
Yes, some of the info is 40 years old, but the physics of RF hasn't
changed.

Mike WA6ILQ



Re: [Repeater-Builder] New Repeater Desense Problems

2008-07-08 Thread no6b
At 7/8/2008 11:37, you wrote:

If you can't hear them you can't repeat them, so a repeater that has a 1.5db
of feedline loss (100 feet of LMR400 at 2m) from the antenna to the receiver
is not going to hear as well as one that has
0.5db of loss (100 feet of 7/8 inch
heliax at 2m).

...except if your repeater is in SoCal, where the antenna noise temperature 
on 2 meters is about 10 dB above kTB, so throwing away a couple of dB 
between the antenna  RX isn't going to hurt you.

Bob NO6B