RE: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-18 Thread Jeff DePolo
 The primary purpose of the equipment grounding conductor 
 (green wire) is to
 provide a low-impedance path for fault current on a branch 
 circuit. The
 lowest-possible impedance is realized only when the EGC is 
 routed alongside
 the phase conductor. Article 250.24(C)(1) states: This 
 conductor shall be
 routed with the phase conductor... I didn't quote the entire 
 sentence,
 because it is very long.

I understand that.  What I was saying is that isn't the *only* ground path.
You're almost guaranteed to have multiple ground fault paths, therefore
EGC's from both systems are already tied together by virtue of those other
paths.  Even if you didn't intentionally jumper the EGC's together, if you
had one device plugged into one outlet and another plugged into another
outlet and both devices mounted in the same rack (or, even just sitting on
top of each other), the EGC's will be electrically joined through the units'
metal cabinet exteriors.

 The reason for keeping the equipment grounding conductors 
 separate is very
 simple; we are talking about a hospital, not some ordinary 
 radio shack.
 The critical (red) buss likely feeds catheter labs, dialysis machines,
 mechanical respirators, and similar equipment that is 
 connected to human
 bodies. Even a few milliamperes of stray current flowing through a
 grounding conductor may take a side trip through a patient's 
 heart and kill
 them. 

Well, now we're getting into a completely different topic.  Line powered
medical equipment is wholly isolated from the patient.  While I'm no expert
on the subject, there's something called the isolation barrier which wholly
isolates the patient from the electrical system.

 One of the previous posters suggested putting the computer on 
 the white
 buss, with the repeater on the red buss. That's a good idea, 
 but be careful
 to use a fiber-optic link to pass data between them, else the 
 two devices
 will have a common ground connection through the data cable's shield.

Depending on what the interface is between the two, that may or may not be
necessary.  Twisted pair Ethernet is transformer-coupled, so no additional
isolation is necessary (just don't use shielded cable).  For simple things
like control logic (PTT, COR, whatever), just use an optocoupler.  For
audio, transformers.

--- Jeff WN3A



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-18 Thread Eric Lemmon
Jeff,

Whether multiple ground paths exist is irrelevant.  What the NEC requires is
a direct, low-impedance fault return path for each branch circuit,
considered individually.  You cannot dispense with any ground paths because
you think there exists alternate paths.  While it is true that parallel
paths may decrease the total impedance to a fault on any one branch circuit,
that in no way constitutes license to eliminate a required grounding
connection.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff DePolo
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 7:50 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

 The primary purpose of the equipment grounding conductor 
 (green wire) is to
 provide a low-impedance path for fault current on a branch 
 circuit. The
 lowest-possible impedance is realized only when the EGC is 
 routed alongside
 the phase conductor. Article 250.24(C)(1) states: This 
 conductor shall be
 routed with the phase conductor... I didn't quote the entire 
 sentence,
 because it is very long.

I understand that. What I was saying is that isn't the *only* ground path.
You're almost guaranteed to have multiple ground fault paths, therefore
EGC's from both systems are already tied together by virtue of those other
paths. Even if you didn't intentionally jumper the EGC's together, if you
had one device plugged into one outlet and another plugged into another
outlet and both devices mounted in the same rack (or, even just sitting on
top of each other), the EGC's will be electrically joined through the units'
metal cabinet exteriors.

 The reason for keeping the equipment grounding conductors 
 separate is very
 simple; we are talking about a hospital, not some ordinary 
 radio shack.
 The critical (red) buss likely feeds catheter labs, dialysis machines,
 mechanical respirators, and similar equipment that is 
 connected to human
 bodies. Even a few milliamperes of stray current flowing through a
 grounding conductor may take a side trip through a patient's 
 heart and kill
 them. 

Well, now we're getting into a completely different topic. Line powered
medical equipment is wholly isolated from the patient. While I'm no expert
on the subject, there's something called the isolation barrier which wholly
isolates the patient from the electrical system.

 One of the previous posters suggested putting the computer on 
 the white
 buss, with the repeater on the red buss. That's a good idea, 
 but be careful
 to use a fiber-optic link to pass data between them, else the 
 two devices
 will have a common ground connection through the data cable's shield.

Depending on what the interface is between the two, that may or may not be
necessary. Twisted pair Ethernet is transformer-coupled, so no additional
isolation is necessary (just don't use shielded cable). For simple things
like control logic (PTT, COR, whatever), just use an optocoupler. For
audio, transformers.

--- Jeff WN3A



 



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-18 Thread Jeff DePolo
 Jeff,
 
 Whether multiple ground paths exist is irrelevant. What the 
 NEC requires is
 a direct, low-impedance fault return path for each branch circuit,
 considered individually. You cannot dispense with any ground 
 paths because
 you think there exists alternate paths. While it is true that parallel
 paths may decrease the total impedance to a fault on any one 
 branch circuit,
 that in no way constitutes license to eliminate a required grounding
 connection.
 
 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

I KNOW!  I'm not trying to eliminate the required EGC run along with the
current-carrying conductors.  What I'm asking is why you originally said
that you should switch the EGC supplied by the two outlets rather than tying
the two together.  I had asked if there were any provisions in NEC that
allowed for EGC's (whether from two different SDS's or otherwise) to ever be
switched, as I can't recall there being any such case allowed in NEC.  You
replied that by tying EGC's together that you would create a new path
whereby new, harful currents could flow.  I replied that there always exist
multiple EGC paths, whether desired or not, and in the instant case, there
are, or would be, paths between the EGC's of the two systems whether or not
you tied them together.  

So, my question remains, is there a case to be made where it is desirable,
or even allowable, that the EGC can or should be switched?  Let's assume
that in the instant case (the hospital) that they are SDS's.

--- Jeff WN3A



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-18 Thread Jeff DePolo
 
 Jeff,
 
 I understand and appreciate the nuances of your question. I 
 guess what I am
 trying to convey, perhaps unsuccessfully, is that it is 
 unwise to attempt to
 make a case for an exception to the NEC based upon 
 conventional wisdom. 

I guess I'm not explaining myself well either then.  I'm trying NOT to go
against NEC.  I don't believe NEC allows you to switch EGC as you originally
proposed - that's the issue at hand.  I'm not proposing that you eliminate
the NEC-required EGC in any way, shape, or form, even though there likely
exist many alternative ground paths capable of tripping the overcurrent
device in the event of a fault even if the hard-wired EGC didn't exist.  I
was just pointing out that even if the two outlets are on two different
SDS's, that the EGC's are already effectively tied together whether or not
you hard-wired them together in the switching gizmo in the repeater rack.

I believe that you are saying that if we assume that we have two SDS's, then
we have two totally independent EGC's, and the two EGC's must not be allowed
to be tied together, hence the need to switch the EGC's (as well as the hot
and neutral) when switching between the sources, for if you don't, you will
create a hazardous condition.  That's where I started to disagree, which is
what prompted me to ask if there is *any* situation where switching EGC is
allowed in NEC, because I can't recall ever seeing anything like that in the
past but I thought maybe you knew something I didn't.

 My advice is to always ask the AHJ 
 (Authority Having
 Jurisdiction) to provide an interpretation in writing. His or her
 interpretation of the NEC will always trump that of a 
 hospital electrician,
 or even a consulting engineer. The answer to your specific 
 question varies,
 depending upon the opinion of the AHJ, and nothing I or you 
 say or think
 will change that,

I agree that the AHJ is the final word.  But it's not necessarily an issue
of the AHJ official's *interpretation* of NEC.  There are plenty of AHJ's
that have regulations that are more stringent than NEC, or less stringent
than NEC, or in some cases, completely contradictory to NEC.

--- Jeff WN3A






RE: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-15 Thread Mike Morris WA6ILQ
At 08:44 AM 07/14/08, you wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Richard wrote:
  Maybe you could install a battery bank with a good quality four stage
  charger to power the repeaters. When the power drops, since the
  repeaters are already running on batteries, the switchover would be
  seamless.

Good idea, but batteries weigh a lot. And they can explode when struck
by lightning. Also, does the original poster own the radio room? If
not, he probably can't dictate how much more space he takes in the
place.

  Your IRLP computer could be powered with a 1500 watt or better UPS.
  This should allow sufficient runtime, plus the higher capacity should
  get you out of the cheapo consumer grade UPS category. As Eric

A 1500W UPS is overkill for a 100W load.

--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Yeah, but they are pretty much free if you know where to look.  A while
back I had to re-battery six of them that were recovered from a dumpster
behind a hospital.  Nothing wrong with them, just needed new batteries.

And some of the older APCs had a 150a powerpole mount in the bottom
for an external battery pack that gave more run-time..

Mike WA6ILQ



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-14 Thread Eric M.


Good points Richard. 

Not trying be a smart a$$, so please don't take this comment that way, 
but what is the service worth to the community?  SKYWARN, and up here in 
Canada CANWARN, are valuable services that can save lives.  Property can 
be replaced, lives can't.  Maybe there is some local, state or federal 
money that could be tapped into or maybe even some private money for 
that matter.  Maybe suppliers would be willing to give the group a break 
on pricing or even provide it at a substantial savings to the group.  I 
would go direct to the manufacturer.



Couple of thoughts on monitoring power outage.

- Some controllers have inputs that can be monitored and if a signal is 
sensed it sets off an alarm.  But a walwart could be plugged into the 
main receptacle and connected to a controller input with some cleaned up 
DC of course.  In the event of a power failure, the controller would no 
longer see the precense of the required voltage and notification could 
be provided, hopefully spoken if that option is available, and a 
designated person(s) could attend the site to check power.  If you know 
your runtime on the UPS, you know what your response time needs to be.


- I forgot that there was an IRLP computer at the site.  In that case, 
some UPS monitoring software will run on a unix/linux platform, there is 
notification as well, as this software can advise you of outages, self 
test results etc, etc by email.  I am thinking here of the APC line, we 
use them at our data centre for backup server power and in all of our 
LAN closets for backup switch stack power.


I mentioned APC, I have nothing to do with APC, I have only used their 
products and have always been pleased with the results.


Eric,
VA3EAM

Richard wrote:

It would have to be a very large, very high capacity UPS, in order to 
handle the current the transmitters draw. This would be very 
expensive. Maybe you could install a battery bank with a good quality 
four stage charger to power the repeaters. When the power drops, since 
the repeaters are already running on batteries, the switchover would 
be seamless.





Your IRLP computer could be powered with a 1500 watt or better UPS. 
This should allow sufficient runtime, plus the higher capacity should 
get you out of the cheapo consumer grade UPS category. As Eric 
suggests, you could plug the serial cable into the computer, and with 
the right software, the node could monitor the battery voltage when it 
is running on the UPS, then shut the computer down gracefully if the 
voltage drops too low.
 
 
Richard

www.n7tgb.net http://www.n7tgb.net/
 



 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-14 Thread Jeff DePolo
 It is important to switch all three power leads, not just the 
 hot lead,
 because neutrals from separate sources cannot be made common- 
 especially
 when a separately-derived power source is involved- and the equipment
 grounds must guide any fault current back to the source via 
 the most direct
 route, which is alongside the respective hot conductor.

Eric, you probably have more experience with industrial electrical than I
do, but I can't recall anywhere in NEC where switching EGC is permitted,
even with separately-derived systems.  My copy of NEC is back at the shop,
maybe you have yours handy and can provide a reference for my own
edjumication.  

I would tend to think that in a large industrial complex like a hospital or
high-rise building that the distributed, and unavoidable, ground paths,
(i.e. the entire building including conduits, building steel, concrete,
water pipes, etc.) is almost guaranteed to pose a much lower impedance fault
current path than can a single equipment grounding conductor run alongside
the hot.

As a sidebar, many, if not most, emergency generator installations at
communication sites are not seperately-derived systems because the neutrals
*are* tied together at the transfer switch.  However, in the instant case,
where it is unknown whether or not the red and white are on separate
systems, I agree that switching the neutral and hot is the only safe way to
go.

--- Jeff WN3A



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-14 Thread Kris Kirby
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Richard wrote:
 Maybe you could install a battery bank with a good quality four stage 
 charger to power the repeaters. When the power drops, since the 
 repeaters are already running on batteries, the switchover would be 
 seamless.

Good idea, but batteries weigh a lot. And they can explode when struck 
by lightning. Also, does the original poster own the radio room? If 
not, he probably can't dictate how much more space he takes in the 
place.
  
 Your IRLP computer could be powered with a 1500 watt or better UPS. 
 This should allow sufficient runtime, plus the higher capacity should 
 get you out of the cheapo consumer grade UPS category. As Eric 

A 1500W UPS is overkill for a 100W load.

--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But remember, with no superpowers comes no responsibility. 
--rly


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-14 Thread Eric Lemmon
Jeff,

The primary purpose of the equipment grounding conductor (green wire) is to
provide a low-impedance path for fault current on a branch circuit.  The
lowest-possible impedance is realized only when the EGC is routed alongside
the phase conductor.  Article 250.24(C)(1) states:  This conductor shall be
routed with the phase conductor...  I didn't quote the entire sentence,
because it is very long.

The reason for keeping the equipment grounding conductors separate is very
simple;  we are talking about a hospital, not some ordinary radio shack.
The critical (red) buss likely feeds catheter labs, dialysis machines,
mechanical respirators, and similar equipment that is connected to human
bodies.  Even a few milliamperes of stray current flowing through a
grounding conductor may take a side trip through a patient's heart and kill
them.  It the cath lab, there are usually grounding monitors that will cause
an alarm if any stray current is detected.  The notion that someone is
jury-rigging an electrical connection that will make common connections
between a white and a red system is frightening.  Although such a connection
will likely be passive most of the time, if a fault occurs in the equipment,
that fault may perturb critical medical equipment- with tragic results.

In the hospital where I have a repeater on the red circuit, that circuit is
separately-derived by definition, since it has a separate transformer
upstream of the automatic transfer switch.  Even though I am a certified
electrical inspector, I asked for an independent inspection and a signed
certificate of compliance before I plugged anything in.

One of the previous posters suggested putting the computer on the white
buss, with the repeater on the red buss.  That's a good idea, but be careful
to use a fiber-optic link to pass data between them, else the two devices
will have a common ground connection through the data cable's shield.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY


 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff DePolo
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 8:20 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

 It is important to switch all three power leads, not just the 
 hot lead,
 because neutrals from separate sources cannot be made common- 
 especially
 when a separately-derived power source is involved- and the equipment
 grounds must guide any fault current back to the source via 
 the most direct
 route, which is alongside the respective hot conductor.

Eric, you probably have more experience with industrial electrical than I
do, but I can't recall anywhere in NEC where switching EGC is permitted,
even with separately-derived systems. My copy of NEC is back at the shop,
maybe you have yours handy and can provide a reference for my own
edjumication. 

I would tend to think that in a large industrial complex like a hospital or
high-rise building that the distributed, and unavoidable, ground paths,
(i.e. the entire building including conduits, building steel, concrete,
water pipes, etc.) is almost guaranteed to pose a much lower impedance fault
current path than can a single equipment grounding conductor run alongside
the hot.

As a sidebar, many, if not most, emergency generator installations at
communication sites are not seperately-derived systems because the neutrals
*are* tied together at the transfer switch. However, in the instant case,
where it is unknown whether or not the red and white are on separate
systems, I agree that switching the neutral and hot is the only safe way to
go.

--- Jeff WN3A



 



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-14 Thread Richard
You do have a point about the batteries. I did see that it was
revealed in a later post that his main Skywarn (ARES? I forget which)
repeater is a MastrII, which I don't think lends itself well to run on
batteries.
 
The reason I suggested that size UPS, was to move out of the junk
consumer grade UPS' that I don't think should be in a repeater site.
Besides, think of the runtime with a UPS a large as that!
 
Richard
 http://www.n7tgb.net/ www.n7tgb.net
 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Kirby
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 8:44 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources



On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Richard wrote:
 Maybe you could install a battery bank with a good quality four
stage 
 charger to power the repeaters. When the power drops, since the 
 repeaters are already running on batteries, the switchover would be 
 seamless.

Good idea, but batteries weigh a lot. And they can explode when struck

by lightning. Also, does the original poster own the radio room? If 
not, he probably can't dictate how much more space he takes in the 
place.

 Your IRLP computer could be powered with a 1500 watt or better UPS. 
 This should allow sufficient runtime, plus the higher capacity
should 
 get you out of the cheapo consumer grade UPS category. As Eric 

A 1500W UPS is overkill for a 100W load.

--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:kris%40catonic.us us
But remember, with no superpowers comes no responsibility. 
--rly


 


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-14 Thread Richard
I'm not taking it the wrong way, not to worry!
 
Good idea on the soliciting of funds, but I'd be careful of any
strings attached.
 
That is a good idea about the monitoring software on the IRLP node. I
use that on mine, and it sends an email to my cell phone when the
power drops, then again when it is restored.
 
 
 
Richard
 http://www.n7tgb.net/ www.n7tgb.net
 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric M.
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 5:12 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources




Good points Richard.  

Not trying be a smart a$$, so please don't take this comment that way,
but what is the service worth to the community?  SKYWARN, and up here
in Canada CANWARN, are valuable services that can save lives.
Property can be replaced, lives can't.  Maybe there is some local,
state or federal money that could be tapped into or maybe even some
private money for that matter.  Maybe suppliers would be willing to
give the group a break on pricing or even provide it at a substantial
savings to the group.  I would go direct to the manufacturer.


Couple of thoughts on monitoring power outage.

- Some controllers have inputs that can be monitored and if a signal
is sensed it sets off an alarm.  But a walwart could be plugged into
the main receptacle and connected to a controller input with some
cleaned up DC of course.  In the event of a power failure, the
controller would no longer see the precense of the required voltage
and notification could be provided, hopefully spoken if that option is
available, and a designated person(s) could attend the site to check
power.  If you know your runtime on the UPS, you know what your
response time needs to be.

- I forgot that there was an IRLP computer at the site.  In that case,
some UPS monitoring software will run on a unix/linux platform, there
is notification as well, as this software can advise you of outages,
self test results etc, etc by email.  I am thinking here of the APC
line, we use them at our data centre for backup server power and in
all of our LAN closets for backup switch stack power.

I mentioned APC, I have nothing to do with APC, I have only used their
products and have always been pleased with the results.

Eric,
VA3EAM

Richard wrote:





It would have to be a very large, very high capacity UPS, in order to
handle the current the transmitters draw. This would be very
expensive. Maybe you could install a battery bank with a good quality
four stage charger to power the repeaters. When the power drops, since
the repeaters are already running on batteries, the switchover would
be seamless.





Your IRLP computer could be powered with a 1500 watt or better UPS.
This should allow sufficient runtime, plus the higher capacity should
get you out of the cheapo consumer grade UPS category. As Eric
suggests, you could plug the serial cable into the computer, and with
the right software, the node could monitor the battery voltage when it
is running on the UPS, then shut the computer down gracefully if the
voltage drops too low.
 
 
Richard
 http://www.n7tgb.net/ www.n7tgb.net
 

 
http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=104168/grpspId=1705063108/
msgId=83529/stime=1216011209/nc1=4025338/nc2=5191955/nc3=5349276 


 


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-13 Thread Ray Brown
  I work in a hospital, so I have some insight into this.
   
First off, at least in Missouri, the receptacles, wiring, and circuit 
breakers are rated for 20 amps each. SO, normally, this would not be a problem. 
In fact, you could probably run the radio systems entirely on the red 
receptacles all the time. I wouldn't try to put in any kind of relay, or 
transfer switch, as that's handled down near the generators. 
   
HOWEVER, I would definitely run this past the hospital's electricians to 
ensure that the circuits involved do not have something else sharing the 
circuit. Sometimes, alas, several receptacles may be fed by only one circuit. 
This may have been the case with your white receptacles as well. So you need 
to make sure that there's nothing else on that circuit that will overload 
things.
   
I'll mention this, look and see if there was a laser printer on the white 
circuit. They have high instatenous loads as they heat up the fuser drum, and 
it might've been the combination of your power supplies and the printer coming 
on that tripped the breaker. And keep the printer on the white receps, as 
there's almost no reason to have a laser printer on emergency power (unless an 
administrator orders it).
   
 Ray Brown, CBET, BMET II(KB0STN)
   
  

Laryn Lohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  We have two repeaters, plus an IRLP computer, on one emergency-fed
circuit at a hospital. There are normally no problems with this. 
During a recent storm, the AC panel circuit breaker tripped, taking
everything down in the middle of our Skywarn net. 

There are two receptacles near our equipment. One is normal power,
the other is the red Critical Power receptacle. What problems would
anyone see if we would feed everything from the normal power circuit,
and if it would ever trip off, switch to the red receptacle. That
way, if lightning trips the normal circuit, we would instantly feed
our equipment from the red receptacle. 

This sounds so simple, and I'm inclined to build such a setup, but am
I missing something obvious that could cause problems? Any better ideas?

Laryn K8TVZ

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-13 Thread Kris Kirby
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Ray Brown wrote:
 Laryn Lohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   We have two repeaters, plus an IRLP computer, on one emergency-fed 
 circuit at a hospital. There are normally no problems with this. 
 During a recent storm, the AC panel circuit breaker tripped, taking 
 everything down in the middle of our Skywarn net.
 
 There are two receptacles near our equipment. One is normal power, the 
 other is the red Critical Power receptacle. What problems would anyone 
 see if we would feed everything from the normal power circuit, and if 
 it would ever trip off, switch to the red receptacle. That way, if 
 lightning trips the normal circuit, we would instantly feed our 
 equipment from the red receptacle.

Plug the repeaters into the red outlet, and plug everything else into 
the white outlet. 

--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But remember, with no superpowers comes no responsibility. 
--rly


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-13 Thread Eric Lemmon
Laryn,

The simple, and most practical solution, is to use a 3PDT AC relay to switch
between normal and emergency sources.  Feed the coil of the relay from your
normal source, and wire the hot, neutral, and ground from the normal source
to the NO contacts, and the hot, neutral, and ground wires from the
emergency source to the NC contacts.  The common (swinger) leads go to your
repeater.  This way, the relay normally stays energized, and the now-closed
NO contacts feed your repeater.  When the normal buss fails, the relay
relaxes and closes the NC contact to connect your repeater to the emergency
buss.  Voila!

It is important to switch all three power leads, not just the hot lead,
because neutrals from separate sources cannot be made common- especially
when a separately-derived power source is involved- and the equipment
grounds must guide any fault current back to the source via the most direct
route, which is alongside the respective hot conductor.

You might discuss this issue with the hospital electrician, since the
critical buss may already be supplied from the normal buss during normal
operation.  If that's true, the proposed relay scheme is redundant.  But,
before you do anything, find out what caused that tripped circuit breaker-
there may be a dangerous condition that must be fixed.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laryn Lohman
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 5:18 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

We have two repeaters, plus an IRLP computer, on one emergency-fed
circuit at a hospital. There are normally no problems with this. 
During a recent storm, the AC panel circuit breaker tripped, taking
everything down in the middle of our Skywarn net. 

There are two receptacles near our equipment. One is normal power,
the other is the red Critical Power receptacle. What problems would
anyone see if we would feed everything from the normal power circuit,
and if it would ever trip off, switch to the red receptacle. That
way, if lightning trips the normal circuit, we would instantly feed
our equipment from the red receptacle. 

This sounds so simple, and I'm inclined to build such a setup, but am
I missing something obvious that could cause problems? Any better ideas?

Laryn K8TVZ



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-13 Thread Ron Wright
Laryn,

Your thinking is good.  A simple relay, 3 pole/double throw would do what you 
want and power the relay coil with your normal AC power.  When it goes the 
relay drops out and connects the repeater to the RED emergency outlet.

As someone else suggested switch all 3 wires of hot, neutral and safety ground 
just to make sure you are not connecting something that you should not.

Some suggest runing the repeater on the RED emergency outlet and all else on 
the normal outlet.  You need to check to see if this RED outlet is powered all 
the time and not just when the gen/emergency power is running.  Since it goes 
to the generator it might not be.  Easy to check by plugging a lamp under 
normal power conditions.

The only problems I see is the sudden switching back and forth that might occur 
quickly serval times in a short period.  Like turning on/off the repeater power 
supply rapidly, but don't think this would be an issue.

73, ron, n9ee/r




From: Laryn Lohman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/07/13 Sun PM 08:17:51 EDT
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources


We have two repeaters, plus an IRLP computer, on one emergency-fed
circuit at a hospital.  There are normally no problems with this. 
During a recent storm, the AC panel circuit breaker tripped, taking
everything down in the middle of our Skywarn net.   

There are two receptacles near our equipment.  One is normal power,
the other is the red Critical Power receptacle.  What problems would
anyone see if we would feed everything from the normal power circuit,
and if it would ever trip off, switch to the red receptacle.  That
way, if lightning trips the normal circuit, we would instantly feed
our equipment from the red receptacle.  

This sounds so simple, and I'm inclined to build such a setup, but am
I missing something obvious that could cause problems?  Any better ideas?

Laryn K8TVZ

   
 


Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-13 Thread Ray Brown
  Sorry, Ron, I disagree with the relay idea. If it's critical that the radio 
power supply be up all the time, then run it in the emergency circuits, which 
ARE active all the time. Our main ambulance radio and our maintenance repeater 
are on emergency power, as I specificied and coordinated the istallation of 
both of them myself.
   
The only switching occurs when the power goes down, all receptacles (both 
white and red are now dead) then the generators fire up within 15 seconds, 
stabilize, and transfer the feed of the red receptacles from the outside 
utility to the generators. Power switches back automatically after utility 
power has been restored and stays up for at least 5 continuous minutes with no 
dropouts. Then the generators run on cool-down for at least 10 minutes.

My CBET rating means I'm certified as a Biomedical Equipment Technician on 
6 levels of the proper care and feeding of medical instrumentation, including 
power supplies. :-)
   
And, Laryn, I re-read your initial statement. You had 2 repeaters AND a 
computer on the same circuit, and it tripped? Again, what all was on that 
circuit? If the printer was also on that same circuit, you need to get it off 
the red and on the white. But even 100 watt repeaters with linear supplies 
should only draw 4 amps each on full load, plus 4 for the PC and display. 
Something else is on the circuit. Shame you can't take pictures. Check with the 
hospital electrician and see what's up. Good luck!
   
Ray
   
  
Ron Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Laryn,

Your thinking is good. A simple relay, 3 pole/double throw would do what you 
want and power the relay coil with your normal AC power. When it goes the relay 
drops out and connects the repeater to the RED emergency outlet.

As someone else suggested switch all 3 wires of hot, neutral and safety ground 
just to make sure you are not connecting something that you should not.

Some suggest runing the repeater on the RED emergency outlet and all else on 
the normal outlet. You need to check to see if this RED outlet is powered all 
the time and not just when the gen/emergency power is running. Since it goes to 
the generator it might not be. Easy to check by plugging a lamp under normal 
power conditions.

The only problems I see is the sudden switching back and forth that might occur 
quickly serval times in a short period. Like turning on/off the repeater power 
supply rapidly, but don't think this would be an issue.

73, ron, n9ee/r




From: Laryn Lohman 
Date: 2008/07/13 Sun PM 08:17:51 EDT
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

 
We have two repeaters, plus an IRLP computer, on one emergency-fed
circuit at a hospital. There are normally no problems with this. 
During a recent storm, the AC panel circuit breaker tripped, taking
everything down in the middle of our Skywarn net. 

There are two receptacles near our equipment. One is normal power,
the other is the red Critical Power receptacle. What problems would
anyone see if we would feed everything from the normal power circuit,
and if it would ever trip off, switch to the red receptacle. That
way, if lightning trips the normal circuit, we would instantly feed
our equipment from the red receptacle. 

This sounds so simple, and I'm inclined to build such a setup, but am
I missing something obvious that could cause problems? Any better ideas?

Laryn K8TVZ

 

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-13 Thread Mike Morris WA6ILQ
At 07:07 PM 07/13/08, you wrote:
Laryn,

Your thinking is good.  A simple relay, 3 pole/double throw would do 
what you want and power the relay coil with your normal AC 
power.  When it goes the relay drops out and connects the repeater 
to the RED emergency outlet.

As someone else suggested switch all 3 wires of hot, neutral and 
safety ground just to make sure you are not connecting something 
that you should not.

Some suggest runing the repeater on the RED emergency outlet and all 
else on the normal outlet.  You need to check to see if this RED 
outlet is powered all the time and not just when the gen/emergency 
power is running.  Since it goes to the generator it might not 
be.  Easy to check by plugging a lamp under normal power conditions.

The only problems I see is the sudden switching back and forth that 
might occur quickly serval times in a short period.  Like turning 
on/off the repeater power supply rapidly, but don't think this would 
be an issue.

73, ron, n9ee/r

I long long time ago  no, wrong story.

More years than I want to think about I was at a local 2-way shop
trying to beg a cabinet... the owner pointed at a old Moto 6 foot one
in the corner and said clean it out, leave me the radio, take the rest.
So here I was, stripping down a radio cabinet that had come out of
a hospital elevator room.  It turned out to be a Motrac series 90w high
band paging station.

The power wiring was exactly as this comment thread was describing,
with two power plugs (one labeled Normal and one labeled
Generator), and a 4PDT contactor relay that made the entire cabinet
jump an inch when it pulled in with a BANG (the contacts were 440vAC
50a rated on a 120vAC coil).  The overall design had a clock-motor-driven
timer that used a cam and a roller microswitch that implemented a 15
minute delay between generator power and normal power.  In other words,
a switchover from normal to generator was instantaneous, but normal
power had to be on for 15 minutes before the radio system was switched
back to it.

The box the contactor and timer were in had a rotary switch labeled
normal, generator and automatic, with a note saying For
bench test use generator cord and set this switch to generator.

But this is old technology.  Modern electrical practice is that the
red outlets are hot all the time, and the white outlets die during
a power failure.  So the relay is totally un-necessary.  Just plug
the system into a red outlet, and design it so that a short (one
minute or so)  outage does not cause any discontent (maybe
have an AGM battery in the bottom of the rack).

One last comment - the hospital electrician may be keeping a list of
what is on the generator outlets. Or maybe the administrative people
are.  Or maybe there are some other rules. Maybe the local inspectors
has their nose in the hospitals electrical business.

If I were in your shoes I'd get permission in writing from someone in
the hospital before I plugged into that red outlet.  I can envision a future
situation where someone does a red-outlet-audit and finds your box,
and it turns out that the recently-retired electrician gave you verbal
permission a year ago, and the new guy has no idea who you are.
Then the waste matter hits the rotary airfoil.

I'm mentioning this because a friend works at a local convalescent
hospital... they recently did a red-outlet-audit (the first in several
years) and discovered that they are at 93% of generator capacity...
they thought (guessed?) they were at 45-50%.  Right now they
are seeing what can be shed... i.e. moved from red to white, as
a generator upgrade would be a political and financial nightmare
(they would have to replace the underground diesel fuel tank with
one that is much larger, and that would require major permits /
costs / demolition / costs / installation / costs / certification /
costs - and that is just for the tank.  Then you have to fill it at
over $5 a gallon. Then you have the same merry-go-round on
upgrading the generator and it's controls and the load transfer
switch.

Mike WA6ILQ



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-13 Thread Robert Pease
Not sure why everyone is having such a hard time understanding the problem 
here, while unusual, for the red to go dead, it does happen. As was originally 
stated he thought lightning may have kicked it. So red is dead and white is 
light (on). So even though a relay (3 pole) sounds like the ticket I doubt you 
would get the contraption past the biomed electricians.  Everything has to be 
at lwats UL approved and they won't like the thought of anything connected 
across the main buss and the gen buss. What about a battery bank on a charger 
on the red or white bank and the regular power supply on the other with diods 
for switching and isolation.  That way you would isolate the main busses by 
more than a relay and the chance if backfeeding would be almost 0

Just my thoughts. Rob. Ks4ec

Sent by Good Messaging (www.good.com)


 -Original Message-
From:   Ray Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:   Sunday, July 13, 2008 10:30 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject:Re: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

  Sorry, Ron, I disagree with the relay idea. If it's critical that the radio 
power supply be up all the time, then run it in the emergency circuits, which 
ARE active all the time. Our main ambulance radio and our maintenance repeater 
are on emergency power, as I specificied and coordinated the istallation of 
both of them myself.
   
The only switching occurs when the power goes down, all receptacles (both 
white and red are now dead) then the generators fire up within 15 seconds, 
stabilize, and transfer the feed of the red receptacles from the outside 
utility to the generators. Power switches back automatically after utility 
power has been restored and stays up for at least 5 continuous minutes with no 
dropouts. Then the generators run on cool-down for at least 10 minutes.

My CBET rating means I'm certified as a Biomedical Equipment Technician on 
6 levels of the proper care and feeding of medical instrumentation, including 
power supplies. :-)
   
And, Laryn, I re-read your initial statement. You had 2 repeaters AND a 
computer on the same circuit, and it tripped? Again, what all was on that 
circuit? If the printer was also on that same circuit, you need to get it off 
the red and on the white. But even 100 watt repeaters with linear supplies 
should only draw 4 amps each on full load, plus 4 for the PC and display. 
Something else is on the circuit. Shame you can't take pictures. Check with the 
hospital electrician and see what's up. Good luck!
   
Ray
   
  
Ron Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Laryn,

Your thinking is good. A simple relay, 3 pole/double throw would do what you 
want and power the relay coil with your normal AC power. When it goes the relay 
drops out and connects the repeater to the RED emergency outlet.

As someone else suggested switch all 3 wires of hot, neutral and safety ground 
just to make sure you are not connecting something that you should not.

Some suggest runing the repeater on the RED emergency outlet and all else on 
the normal outlet. You need to check to see if this RED outlet is powered all 
the time and not just when the gen/emergency power is running. Since it goes to 
the generator it might not be. Easy to check by plugging a lamp under normal 
power conditions.

The only problems I see is the sudden switching back and forth that might occur 
quickly serval times in a short period. Like turning on/off the repeater power 
supply rapidly, but don't think this would be an issue.

73, ron, n9ee/r




From: Laryn Lohman 
Date: 2008/07/13 Sun PM 08:17:51 EDT
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

 
We have two repeaters, plus an IRLP computer, on one emergency-fed
circuit at a hospital. There are normally no problems with this. 
During a recent storm, the AC panel circuit breaker tripped, taking
everything down in the middle of our Skywarn net. 

There are two receptacles near our equipment. One is normal power,
the other is the red Critical Power receptacle. What problems would
anyone see if we would feed everything from the normal power circuit,
and if it would ever trip off, switch to the red receptacle. That
way, if lightning trips the normal circuit, we would instantly feed
our equipment from the red receptacle. 

This sounds so simple, and I'm inclined to build such a setup, but am
I missing something obvious that could cause problems? Any better ideas?

Laryn K8TVZ

 

Since 1974, the award-winning Alpert JFCS has helped families of all faiths 
throughout most of Palm Beach County, FL, via counseling, seniors services, 
residences for the disabled, mentoring children, support groups and a lot more.

SOLUTIONS FOR LIVING 
www.JFCSonline.com 

Please take note of our new website and E-Mail Addresses. Please update your 
contacts ASAP

Re: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-13 Thread Ron Wright
RAy,

If you read my reply I stated make sure the RED outlets are powered at all 
times by testing with a simple lamp if you want to use all the time.  Different 
states have different codes for Hospitals so would just have to check.  I would 
think the hospital electrical dept would have to notified to make sure the 
repeater equipment could be connected to the RED outlet.  Many times only 
certain equipment is allowed to prevent overload and other problems.

The relay would work if having to switch between outlets.  If the RED outlet is 
powered at all times then probably best to use if allowed.

As for UL as someone else mentioned I assure you there are parts of that Ham 
repeater that do not have UL.  Probably low voltage or current, but there are 
parts in there, but after things like power supplies that are UL.

73, ron, n9ee/r




From: Ray Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/07/13 Sun PM 10:28:21 EDT
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources


  Sorry, Ron, I disagree with the relay idea. If it's critical that the radio 
power supply be up all the time, then run it in the emergency circuits, which 
ARE active all the time. Our main ambulance radio and our maintenance repeater 
are on emergency power, as I specificied and coordinated the istallation of 
both of them myself./div  div /div  div  The only switching occurs 
when the power goes down, all receptacles (both white and red are now dead) 
then the generators fire up within 15 seconds, stabilize, and transfer the 
feed of the red receptacles from the outside utility to the generators. Power 
switches back automatically after utility power has been restored and stays up 
for at least 5 continuous minutes with no dropouts. Then the generators run on 
cool-down for at least 10 minutes.BR/div  div  My CBET rating means I'm 
certified as a Biomedical Equipment Technician on 6 levels of the proper care 
and feeding of medical instrumentation, including power supplies. :-)       
And, Laryn, I re-read your initial statement. You had 2 repeaters AND a 
computer on the same circuit, and it tripped? Again, what all was on that 
circuit? If the printer was also on that same circuit, you need to get it off 
the red and on the white. But even 100 watt repeaters with linear supplies 
should only draw 4 amps each on full load, plus 4 for the PC and display. 
Something else is on the circuit. Shame you can't take pictures. Check with 
the hospital electrician and see what's up. Good luck!       Ray     
Ron Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Laryn,

Your thinking is good. A simple relay, 3 pole/double throw would do what you 
want and power the relay coil with your normal AC power. When it goes the 
relay drops out and connects the repeater to the RED emergency outlet.

As someone else suggested switch all 3 wires of hot, neutral and safety ground 
just to make sure you are not connecting something that you should not.

Some suggest runing the repeater on the RED emergency outlet and all else on 
the normal outlet. You need to check to see if this RED outlet is powered all 
the time and not just when the gen/emergency power is running. Since it goes 
to the generator it might not be. Easy to check by plugging a lamp under 
normal power conditions.

The only problems I see is the sudden switching back and forth that might 
occur quickly serval times in a short period. Like turning on/off the repeater 
power supply rapidly, but don't think this would be an issue.

73, ron, n9ee/r




From: Laryn Lohman 
Date: 2008/07/13 Sun PM 08:17:51 EDT
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

 
We have two repeaters, plus an IRLP computer, on one emergency-fed
circuit at a hospital. There are normally no problems with this. 
During a recent storm, the AC panel circuit breaker tripped, taking
everything down in the middle of our Skywarn net. 

There are two receptacles near our equipment. One is normal power,
the other is the red Critical Power receptacle. What problems would
anyone see if we would feed everything from the normal power circuit,
and if it would ever trip off, switch to the red receptacle. That
way, if lightning trips the normal circuit, we would instantly feed
our equipment from the red receptacle. 

This sounds so simple, and I'm inclined to build such a setup, but am
I missing something obvious that could cause problems? Any better ideas?

Laryn K8TVZ

  



Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-13 Thread Eric M.


Why not use a UPS?

Plug the repeater and equipment into the UPS and then plug the UPS into 
the receptacle of choice.  Might be cheaper and easier to do this then 
to design, test, get permission from the hospital to install, install it 
and maintain it.  I am sure that the hospital is going to want to make 
sure what you install is approved for such use.  Some ups's provide a 
serial port for communication to a serial device, maybe you can access 
it remotely via packet to check status, logs and battery condition.


Eric.

Laryn Lohman wrote:


We have two repeaters, plus an IRLP computer, on one emergency-fed
circuit at a hospital. There are normally no problems with this.
During a recent storm, the AC panel circuit breaker tripped, taking
everything down in the middle of our Skywarn net.

There are two receptacles near our equipment. One is normal power,
the other is the red Critical Power receptacle. What problems would
anyone see if we would feed everything from the normal power circuit,
and if it would ever trip off, switch to the red receptacle. That
way, if lightning trips the normal circuit, we would instantly feed
our equipment from the red receptacle.

This sounds so simple, and I'm inclined to build such a setup, but am
I missing something obvious that could cause problems? Any better ideas?

Laryn K8TVZ

 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-07-13 Thread Richard
It would have to be a very large, very high capacity UPS, in order to
handle the current the transmitters draw. This would be very
expensive. Maybe you could install a battery bank with a good quality
four stage charger to power the repeaters. When the power drops, since
the repeaters are already running on batteries, the switchover would
be seamless.
 
Your IRLP computer could be powered with a 1500 watt or better UPS.
This should allow sufficient runtime, plus the higher capacity should
get you out of the cheapo consumer grade UPS category. As Eric
suggests, you could plug the serial cable into the computer, and with
the right software, the node could monitor the battery voltage when it
is running on the UPS, then shut the computer down gracefully if the
voltage drops too low.
 
 
Richard
 http://www.n7tgb.net/ www.n7tgb.net
 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric M.
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 9:25 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources




Why not use a UPS?

Plug the repeater and equipment into the UPS and then plug the UPS
into the receptacle of choice.  Might be cheaper and easier to do this
then to design, test, get permission from the hospital to install,
install it and maintain it.  I am sure that the hospital is going to
want to make sure what you install is approved for such use.  Some
ups's provide a serial port for communication to a serial device,
maybe you can access it remotely via packet to check status, logs and
battery condition.

Eric.

Laryn Lohman wrote:



We have two repeaters, plus an IRLP computer, on one emergency-fed
circuit at a hospital. There are normally no problems with this. 
During a recent storm, the AC panel circuit breaker tripped, taking
everything down in the middle of our Skywarn net. 

There are two receptacles near our equipment. One is normal power,
the other is the red Critical Power receptacle. What problems would
anyone see if we would feed everything from the normal power circuit,
and if it would ever trip off, switch to the red receptacle. That
way, if lightning trips the normal circuit, we would instantly feed
our equipment from the red receptacle. 

This sounds so simple, and I'm inclined to build such a setup, but am
I missing something obvious that could cause problems? Any better
ideas?

Laryn K8TVZ