re[2]: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem from pager tr

2004-12-22 Thread Bob Dengler

At 12/21/2004 10:09 AM, you wrote:



John,

Since I am the guy running the IRLP node you refer to, I thought I
might take a moment to reply.

The equipment now consists solely of Motorola GM300's, not amateur
grade equipment.   For the last six months or more both the 2m and
440 transmitters have had large cavity filters in place.  I believe
you may still be thinking of the original experimental equipment used
for proof of concept.   The 2m cavity is a Sinclair 10 diameter
unit.  As for the deviation I have measured it with a Motorola Model
2600 service monitor at 6 KHz, about the same as other repeaters in
this area.

Just curious as to why you ( the other repeaters in your area for that 
matter) run more than the almost universally-accepted NBFM standard of 5 
kHz peak deviation?  At 6 kHz, I think even 20 kHz channel spacing begins 
to experience adjacent-channel interference.

I say almost because here in SoCal 4.2 kHz is the standard on 2 meters in 
order to get 15 kHz spacing to work right.

Bob NO6B






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






re[2]: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem from pager tr

2004-12-21 Thread mbloom0947



John,
 
Since I am the guy running the IRLP node you refer to, I thought I 
might take a moment to reply.
 
The equipment now consists solely of Motorola GM300's, not amateur 
grade equipment.   For the last six months or more both the 2m and 
440 transmitters have had large cavity filters in place.  I believe 
you may still be thinking of the original experimental equipment used 
for proof of concept.   The 2m cavity is a Sinclair 10 diameter 
unit.  As for the deviation I have measured it with a Motorola Model 
2600 service monitor at 6 KHz, about the same as other repeaters in 
this area.  The node can be heard 100 miles away in some directions 
by mobiles and those same mobiles running 75 watts, about the same as 
the node transmitter output, can be heard as well.   As for the 
frequency, I'm running a SIMPLEX node on a SIMPLEX frequency.
 
I just thought I'd bring you up to date and suggest that you check 
your facts next time.  
 
Sincerely,
Michael Bloom W7RAT











 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Re: re[2]: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem from pager tr

2004-12-21 Thread Barry Thompson

I guess the callsign explains it all.

--- mbloom0947 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 
 
 
 John,
  
 Since I am the guy running the IRLP node you
 refer to, I thought I 
 might take a moment to reply.
  
 The equipment now consists solely of Motorola
 GM300's, not amateur 
 grade equipment.   For the last six months or
 more both the 2m and 
 440 transmitters have had large cavity filters
 in place.  I believe 
 you may still be thinking of the original
 experimental equipment used 
 for proof of concept.   The 2m cavity is a
 Sinclair 10 diameter 
 unit.  As for the deviation I have measured it
 with a Motorola Model 
 2600 service monitor at 6 KHz, about the same
 as other repeaters in 
 this area.  The node can be heard 100 miles
 away in some directions 
 by mobiles and those same mobiles running 75
 watts, about the same as 
 the node transmitter output, can be heard as
 well.   As for the 
 frequency, I'm running a SIMPLEX node on a
 SIMPLEX frequency.
  
 I just thought I'd bring you up to date and
 suggest that you check 
 your facts next time.  
  
 Sincerely,
 Michael Bloom W7RAT
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
 

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
 
 
 
 




__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com 




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Re: re[2]: [Repeater-Builder] HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem from pager tr

2004-12-21 Thread JOHN MACKEY

Hi Michael-

Last time you  I talked (about 3 months ago) you said you were running
amateur grade gear on your IRLP node at the KOIN-TV tower.  Apparently you
recently changed to commercial grade gear, which is a good thing! Also, the
last time you  I talked you REFUSED the suggestion of using cavity filters on
your transmittes because it would prevent you from being frequency agile. 
Apparently you decided to change this also?
Those are good moves, Michael.  Those actions will go a long way to resolving
the interference problems that have been associated with your IRLP node. 
Perhaps, that is all that was needed!

But I really think you should re-check your deviation reports.  The repeaters
in this area are not running 6 KHz deviation.  Good amateur practice for
practically all voice repeaters is about 4.5 KHz deviation or no more than 5
Khz MAX.  Your suggestion of 6 KHz deviation is roughly 20-25% over.  On the
other hand, that is far better than the 9 KHz deviation for your system (as
checked by Dalcomm) as you stated in your previous e-mail to me a few months
ago.  I have attached that e-mail immediately below.

-- Original Message --
Received: 03 September 2004
From: mbloom0947 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear John,  Thank you for your response. Actually, we did use a radio
communications company called Dalcomm Communications, who are very
experienced in this sort of thing and quite well equipped. I checked back
with them and learned that the PEAK deviation (not the average) was 9 KHz. Of
course the average deviation would depend upon an integration of the signal
over time and would be dependent upon the nature of the source audio. I do
appreciate your offer to do the measurements and acknowledge that you have
made this kind offer in the past.  The reason I chose to use Dalcomm was that
I wanted the measurements to be made by an independent company with no
preconceived notions whose only interest is to provide accurate result. 
Sincerely  Michael Bloom W7RAT  


-- Original Message --
Received: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 04:55:31 PM CST
From: mbloom0947 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Since I am the guy running the IRLP node you refer to, I thought I 
 might take a moment to reply.
  
 The equipment now consists solely of Motorola GM300's, not amateur 
 grade equipment.   For the last six months or more both the 2m and 
 440 transmitters have had large cavity filters in place.  I believe 
 you may still be thinking of the original experimental equipment used 
 for proof of concept.   The 2m cavity is a Sinclair 10 diameter 
 unit.  As for the deviation I have measured it with a Motorola Model 
 2600 service monitor at 6 KHz, about the same as other repeaters in 
 this area.  The node can be heard 100 miles away in some directions 
 by mobiles and those same mobiles running 75 watts, about the same as 
 the node transmitter output, can be heard as well.   As for the 
 frequency, I'm running a SIMPLEX node on a SIMPLEX frequency.
  
 I just thought I'd bring you up to date and suggest that you check 
 your facts next time.  
  
 Sincerely,
 Michael Bloom W7RAT
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/