On Aug 23, 2007, at 8:39 PM, Michael L. Davis wrote:
Hi,
So I touch'ed prototype-compressed.js (to get rid of the 403) and
we get:
[0] GET /startpage/scripts/prototype-compressed.js HTTP/1.1
[0] Remote-IP: 75.71.75.22:3697
[0] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070725 Firefox/2.0.0.6
[0] Accept: */*
[0] Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5
[0] Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
[0] Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
[0] Keep-Alive: 300
[0] Connection: keep-alive
[0] If-Modified-Since: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:22:02 GMT
[0] If-None-Match: 831XFs4IZoh
[0] Cache-Control: max-age=0
[0] HTTP/1.1 200 OK
[0] ETag: 8UCDSWLScH5
[0] Last-Modified: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:28:45 GMT
[0] Accept-Ranges: bytes
[0] Cache-Control: max-age=5
[0] Expires: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:28:57 GMT
[0] Content-Type: application/x-javascript
[0] Content-Length: 52498
[0] write-chunk(16384)
Thanks. I've filed a bug at http://bugs.caucho.com/view.php?
id=1972.That looks like it should be compressable, but it's not
getting compressed.
-- Scott
AutoCommitWriteBlock[Store[2],2] create
db-block remove AutoCommitWriteBlock[Store[2],2]
AutoCommitWriteBlock[Store[2],2] create
db-block remove AutoCommitWriteBlock[Store[2],2]
[0] write-chunk(16384)
AutoCommitWriteBlock[Store[2],2] create
db-block remove AutoCommitWriteBlock[Store[2],2]
AutoCommitWriteBlock[Store[2],2] create
db-block remove AutoCommitWriteBlock[Store[2],2]
[0] write-chunk(16384)
AutoCommitWriteBlock[Store[2],2] create
db-block remove AutoCommitWriteBlock[Store[2],2]
AutoCommitWriteBlock[Store[2],2] create
db-block remove AutoCommitWriteBlock[Store[2],2]
AutoCommitWriteBlock[Store[2],2] create
db-block remove AutoCommitWriteBlock[Store[2],2]
caching: /startpage/scripts/prototype-compressed.js
etag=8UCDSWLScH5
length=52498
[0] keepalive
[0] keepalive (select)
The 'write-chunk(16284)' looks like it is trying to do something - but
FireBug and that website that sends HEAD instead of GET both report
53K.
If someone can convince me that FireBug is just plain wrong (tho it
correctly reports on Windows XP) ...
OK. Maybe FireBug et. al. ARE wrong. I opened a fresh FireFox window
over dialup and it took 27 seconds (a page refresh then took 2
seconds)
, 1/3 the time that the websiteoptimization.com site said it should
and
1/2 the time a back-of-the-envelope calculation indicated. And given
that the JS is most of the bytes going over the line, I now think that
it IS being compressed but incorrectly reported on.
So, uh, I will continue to investigate, but I am afraid I have
bothered
everybody needlessly. Thanks for your help!
Mike.
___
resin-interest mailing list
resin-interest@caucho.com
http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest
___
resin-interest mailing list
resin-interest@caucho.com
http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest
