Re: Installing ReviewBoard on latest Ubuntu
Something's red flagging for me here. How did you install Review Board initially? You shouldn't be hitting any of these dependency errors. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:59 PM, mmn...@gmail.com mmn...@gmail.com wrote: Now I have everything else installed. Then the installation started complaining of django not found, though I had django 1.3.2. So I installed the django1.3.1 using the same mechanism you mentioned earlier, but still the complaint is the same. mmn@mmn-hp-workstation-xw4100:/$ rb-site install /var/www/ xmp.reviews.com Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/bin/rb-site, line 5, in module from pkg_resources import load_entry_point File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 2676, in module parse_requirements(__requires__), Environment() File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 552, in resolve raise DistributionNotFound(req) pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: Django=1.3.1 mmn@mmn-hp-workstation-xw4100:/tmp/djblets$ sudo easy_install django==1.3.1 Searching for django==1.3.1 Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/django/ Reading http://www.djangoproject.com/ Best match: Django 1.3.1 Downloading http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.3.1.tar.gz#md5=62d8642fd06b9a0bf8544178f8500767 error: None On Dec 13, 11:39 am, mmn...@gmail.com mmn...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks. That fixed it. There are other packages missing, I am getting them installed as we speak. Looks like the native python installation on Ubuntu comes with vanilla flavour. Regards, On Dec 13, 11:03 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Try: sudo easy_install python-dateutil==1.5 Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:00 PM, mmn...@gmail.com mmn...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have installed ReviewBoard and all supporting packages (except pylucene) on latest Ubuntu 11.10. However when I try to create a site I am getting mmn@mmn-hp-workstation-xw4100:~$ rb-site install /var/www/ xmp.reviews.com Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/bin/rb-site, line 5, in module from pkg_resources import load_entry_point File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 2676, in module parse_requirements(__requires__), Environment() File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 552, in resolve raise DistributionNotFound(req) pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: python-dateutil==1.5 mmn@mmn-hp-workstation-xw4100:~$ sudo apt-get install python-dateutil Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done python-dateutil is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 259 not upgraded Can you please help me out? Looks like my python-dateutil is higher than 1.5 version as it is the latest Ubuntu Regards, -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Review group mailing list too long
According to RFC2181 domain names can be a maximum of 255 characters. As we have some team members that have 40+ characters in the combination of their first and last names, I'd recommend bumping this to a to at least 255 (the maximum size of a VARCHAR in MySQL = 5.0.3) or even better, make a 5.0.4 a minimum requirement for MySQL and make it larger. PostgreSQL doesn't have this issue (I, however, prefer MySQL). On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Igor Berger codewiz...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm trying to specify a mailing for a review group. Unfortunately, the list email address is too long. It's not possible to make it shorter, because of a very long domain name. The input box on the Change review group screen is truncating the input at 75 characters. Is there a way around this? Thanks, Igor. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Chris Tooley mobile: 615-525-8067 Instant Messenger MSN: ctoo...@ntrc.net AIM: mrchristooley Yahoo: mrchristooley Google Talk: ctoo...@gmail.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Installing ReviewBoard on latest Ubuntu
Yes. So pip and easy_install should fetch the same results I think. This is showing a timeout when installing Django 1.3.1 using pip in verbose mode. I think because of this Django is not getting installed at all. I am using Ubuntu 11.10. I can try manually downloading and installing Django from source and see as well. Regards, On Dec 14, 8:23 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: The choice of pip vs. easy_install doesn't actually matter here. Personally, I use easy_install. You're hitting some very strange issues that are not at all common on a system. I'm a bit stuck as to where you are in this. What exactly is failing? What version of Ubuntu is this? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:03 PM, mmn...@gmail.com mmn...@gmail.com wrote: I might have hit on the issue. I think pip is expected to be the replacement for easy_install? I used pip to first remove ReviewBoard and then tried to reinstall in verbose mode. From this it looks like there is a timeout, but on easy_install even with verbose option nothing is getting printed as error. Other than this I cannot think of any reason why Django is not found. mmn@mmn-hp-workstation-xw4100://$ sudo pip -v install ReviewBoard Downloading/unpacking ReviewBoard Running setup.py egg_info for package ReviewBoard running egg_info writing requirements to pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/ requires.txt writing pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/PKG-INFO writing top-level names to pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/ top_level.txt writing dependency_links to pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/ dependency_links.txt writing entry points to pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/ entry_points.txt warning: manifest_maker: standard file '-c' not found reading manifest file 'pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/ SOURCES.txt' reading manifest template 'MANIFEST.in' warning: no files found matching '*' under directory 'locale' no previously-included directories found matching 'docs/*/_build' no previously-included directories found matching 'reviewboard/ htdocs/media/uploaded/images' writing manifest file 'pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/ SOURCES.txt' Downloading/unpacking Django=1.3.1 (from ReviewBoard) Ignoring link http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.1.tar.gz#m... (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.1 doesn't match =1.3.1 Ignoring link http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.7.tar.gz#m... (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.7 doesn't match =1.3.1 Ignoring link http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.5.tar.gz#m... (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.5 doesn't match =1.3.1 Ignoring link http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.6.tar.gz#m... (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.6 doesn't match =1.3.1 Ignoring link http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.4.tar.gz#m... (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.4 doesn't match =1.3.1 Ignoring link http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.tar.gz#md5... (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2 doesn't match =1.3.1 Ignoring link http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.1.3.tar.gz#m... (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.1.3 doesn't match =1.3.1 Ignoring link http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.3.tar.gz#md5... (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.3 doesn't match =1.3.1 Ignoring link http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.3.tar.gz#m... (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.3 doesn't match =1.3.1 Ignoring link http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.1.4.tar.gz#m... (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.1.4 doesn't match =1.3.1 Ignoring link http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.2.tar.gz#m... (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.2 doesn't match =1.3.1 Ignoring link http://media.djangoproject.com/releases/1.1/Django-1.1.3.tar.gz (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.1.3 doesn't match =1.3.1 Ignoring link http://media.djangoproject.com/releases/1.2/Django-1.2.4.tar.gz (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.4 doesn't match =1.3.1 Ignoring link http://media.djangoproject.com/releases/1.2/Django-1.2.tar.gz (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2 doesn't match =1.3.1 Ignoring link http://media.djangoproject.com/releases/1.2/Django-1.2.1.tar.gz (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.1 doesn't match
Issue 2420 in reviewboard: git --diff with binary patch looses index ... and GIT binary patch lines
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2420 by tif...@gmail.com: git --diff with binary patch
looses index ... and GIT binary patch lines
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2420
reviewboard 1.6.3
Take the following patch:
---
diff --git a/application.exe b/application.exe
index
08755e0dc70874dac727cd84ac7d0d0fe047ab63..bbc72b31473c94a4d28c0745bad6b62b478bc8cd
GIT binary patch
literal 524288
zc%1CLeOy%47C(H38DP{=M#V%WMI*(eA~A)A5?=;LK?lJZQ9!UiL6X#)JlySD2~S|
...
---
When uploading it to reviewboard and downloading it again, it becomes:
---
diff --git a/application.exe b/application.exe
literal 524288
zc%1CLeOy%47C(H38DP{=M#V%WMI*(eA~A)A5?=;LK?lJZQ9!UiL6X#)JlySD2~S|
...
---
= The index hash and the GIT binary patch line are gone. The diff has
become unusable.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2320 in reviewboard: User password is not passed to ssh client
Comment #4 on issue 2320 by m.sahala...@gmail.com: User password is not passed to ssh client http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2320 Hi, does anyone have a solution to this? We've been trialling RB for a while now, but authentication issues will stop us from deploying properly :( Thanks in advance! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 2421 in reviewboard: Publishing a review fails
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2421 by attila.m...@gmail.com: Publishing a review fails http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2421 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. * * If you need immediate support, please contact* * reviewbo...@googlegroups.com * What version are you running? OneCodeReview 1.6 rc_1a 2 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? http://onecodereview.nce.amadeus.net/cmbflt/r/1204/ What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Log in using Centrify 2. Hit Ship It or Review-Publish 3. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Code Review published and email sent What operating system are you using? What browser? Firefox 8.0 / Safari 5.0.5 Please provide any additional information below. Seemed to work OK from IE Explorer 6 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2421 in reviewboard: Publishing a review fails
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 2421 by trowb...@gmail.com: Publishing a review fails http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2421 What error are you seeing? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2421 in reviewboard: Publishing a review fails
Comment #2 on issue 2421 by chip...@gmail.com: Publishing a review fails http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2421 OneCodeReview? This doesn't sound like upstream Review Board. You may want to get in touch with your admins first. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2421 in reviewboard: Publishing a review fails
Comment #3 on issue 2421 by attila.m...@gmail.com: Publishing a review fails http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2421 Yes, didn't realise the issue went out to google, apologies. There is an issue, but I'll track it through internal admins. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2421 in reviewboard: Publishing a review fails
Updates: Status: ThirdParty Comment #4 on issue 2421 by trowb...@gmail.com: Publishing a review fails http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2421 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 929 in reviewboard: reviewboard should not alter the diff file
Comment #7 on issue 929 by trowb...@gmail.com: reviewboard should not alter the diff file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=929 Issue 2420 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2420 in reviewboard: git --diff with binary patch looses index ... and GIT binary patch lines
Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 929 Comment #1 on issue 2420 by trowb...@gmail.com: git --diff with binary patch looses index ... and GIT binary patch lines http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2420 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
