Re: Ways to archieve old reviews
Thank you so much, Christian! So we shall make the education begin in our team! :) Le vendredi 7 décembre 2012 19:42:11 UTC+8, Christian Hammond a écrit : Hi Lucas, People should be closing review requests when the accompanying change is submitted. That's your archival process, basically. Education is going to be the most important thing here. People have to get into that habit. #1 is probably what you want to do to start off, and then make sure people get in the habit of closing. I know some companies have custom scripts that help with auto-closing, but I don't have access to them. #2 is not doable today. I know of servers with over 400,000 review requests and no speed issues. The review requests are being closed properly on those. But all that being said, I wouldn't expect it to take that long. What version of Review Board are you using? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Lucas Wong yanch...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Hi: On our reviewboard, we have accumulated more than 65000 reviews. As a result, the index page for everyone is a little bit slow, taking almost 10s to open, the other pages are working just fine. I took a guess that this is because the huge number of reviews. My questions are: 1. If we close all reviews older than, say 3 months, that would left us will about 5000 active reviews. Will this increase the index performance? 2. Is it possible to set the default index page for everyone to incoming reviews that would work around the slow index page problem. Thanks you very much! -Lucas -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Configured repository doesn't show on New Review Request page
Hi! It is a valuable piece of information, still, I have questions remained. 'cleartool lsview' with -cview flag presupposes that there is a view already set (-cview means current view). Do I need to provide the command which sets the view in the path field of the repo, or the application is already needed to be ran on the server with the view set? Thanks, Géza 2012/12/7 Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com: Hi, I'm not an expert on the Clear Case setups, but going through the code, we do this: cleartool lsview -full -properties -cview If we get an error, we won't show the repository. We then look through the output. If there's no Properties: with dynamic or snapshot, we fail. Otherwise, it should list the repository. Hope that in some way helps. Our Clear Case support is not really a first-class citizen. It's a series of contributions, but unfortunately not one I know a lot about. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Géza Kulcsár gesap...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! I checked and it really seems that path will be problem? Could you help me in providing correct path format? Do I only need /vobs/..., or I need a view name on top of it, or any other variation? I'm a bit confused, as your documentation mentions views somewhere, but your on-page hint states absolute path, which, from server point of view, would be /vobs/... Thanks, Géza Kulcsár 2012/12/6 Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com: Sorry, yes, cleartool. (It's a bit late here.) If cleartool is there, then yeah, it's probably a repository path problem. I'd see if there's any error information in the reviewboard.log file that indicates what may be going wrong. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 2:43 AM, Géza Kulcsár gesap...@gmail.com wrote: Do you mean cleartool? I assume then, that answer is yes. Unfortunately, I can only assume as I don't have direct access to server, I can only instruct the responsible technician. At first, when I tried to add vobs, there was an error message stating The executable cleartool is not in the path. I asked him to fix it, and it seemed that it works as I became able to add repos. The problem now is that they don't show up in the list. If cleartool is installed, could the cause still be that I'm not providing proper path information? Thanks, Géza Kulcsár 2012/12/6 Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com: Hey, Do you have the clearcase command line tool installed on the server? If it's not found, then it won't display. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Géza Kulcsár gesap...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! I'm trying to configure Review Board with ClearCase. I have successfully added a repository, but I'm not sure whether I'm giving path information in correct form. Could it affect if the repository showing or not in the list on New Review Request page? As I go there, there is nothing in the list but the default None option. Thanks, Best regards, Géza Kulcsár -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Re: Review Board 1.7 RC 1 is released!
Not sure what you mean by not proper?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 10:11 PM, kvr kvr@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks ! , that resolved the issue ,but UI is not proper.
On Saturday, December 8, 2012 5:19:51 PM UTC+5:30, Vishal Gautam wrote:
That worked!!! Installed the latest Djblets 0.7.6 and it worked.
Thank you so much Chris!
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Christian Hammond chi...@gmail.comwrote:
If you upgrade Djblets to what's in Git, this will go away. I'll see
about doing another Djblets release tonight, though, to fix it.
As soon as we finish docs, 1.7 will be released.
Christian
On Dec 7, 2012, at 21:21, Vishal Gautam gautam...@gmail.com wrote:
Turned Debug=True, now i see this ... any pointers?
Traceback:
File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/**site-packages/Django-1.4.2-**
py2.6.egg/django/core/**handlers/base.py in get_response
89. response = middleware_method(request)
File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/**site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.**
7rc1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/**admin/middleware.py in process_request
44. load_site_config()
File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/**site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.**
7rc1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/**admin/siteconfig.py in load_site_config
215. apply_django_settings(**siteconfig, settings_map)
File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/**site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-**
py2.6.egg/djblets/siteconfig/**django_settings.py in
apply_django_settings
210. setter(settings, setting_key, value)
File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/**site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-**
py2.6.egg/djblets/siteconfig/**django_settings.py in _set_cache_backend
48. engine, host, params = parse_backend_uri(value)
File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/**site-packages/Django-1.4.2-**
py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__**init__.py in parse_backend_uri
58. if backend_uri.find(':') == -1:
Exception Type: AttributeError at /
Exception Value: 'dict' object has no attribute 'find'
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Christian Hammond chi...@gmail.comwrote:
We're definitely compatible with Python 2.6. All the entries in the log
you provided are just harmless warnings, so it must be something else
causing the HTTP 500 error. Is there nothing else after that in the log
file?
Christian
On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:56, Vishal Gautam gautam...@gmail.com wrote:
Ahh ... that python upgrade caused a lot of damage (being a newbie),
spent entire day battling it ... since it was a new install, I recreated
the site with new db, got plethora of errors. Thinking Python 2.7 could be
an issue I have now downgraded to Python 2.6 and re-installed RB 1.7 and
recreated the site. Now i get a 500 with following errors in error_log. Is
RB 1.7 not compatible with Python 2.6?
[Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error] /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-**
packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.6.**egg/djblets/gravatars/__init__**.py:26:
DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
[Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error] from md5 import md5
[Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error] /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-**
packages/Django-1.4.2-py2.6.**egg/django/views/generic/list_**detail.py:10:
DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use
class-based views instead.
[Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error] DeprecationWarning
On Friday, December 7, 2012 12:13:16 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond
wrote:
Hi,
First, do you have a backup of the database?
What actions did you take on the database prior to this attempt? For
example, did you ever run evolve yourself? Or attempt a downgrade after an
upgrade?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Vishal Gautam gautam...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks for the response Chris!
I upgrade CentOS to 5.8, manually installed Python 2.7, upgraded
setuptools for 2.7, then upgraded RB to 1.7rc1. All this made it fine
(after getting bunch of issues those I could look up in Google). Now I am
stuck at upgrading the site and my RB instance is down ... Please
help!
[root@jira ~]# /usr/local/bin/rb-site upgrade /var/www/
reviews.xxx..com
Rebuilding directory structure
Updating database. This may take a while.
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.7.**e**
gg/djblets/gravatars/__init__**.**py:26: DeprecationWarning: the md5
module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
from md5 import md5
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-**li**
nux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/**num**ber.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning:
Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid
timing attack vulnerability.
Creating tables ...
Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
Installing custom SQL
Re: Cross Referencing Code in RB
Hi Vishal, This is something I'd like to see down the road, and I have some thoughts on it, but there are no short-term plans. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Vishal Gautam gautamvis...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Folks, Is there any way code can be cross referenced / hyperlinked in RB, like tools like LXR do and other review tools like Codestriker integrates with? thanks, Vishal -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Configured repository doesn't show on New Review Request page
Hi Géza, Sorry, I missed a crucial piece of information. That command is run from the directory specified by the Repository Path. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Géza Kulcsár gesap...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! It is a valuable piece of information, still, I have questions remained. 'cleartool lsview' with -cview flag presupposes that there is a view already set (-cview means current view). Do I need to provide the command which sets the view in the path field of the repo, or the application is already needed to be ran on the server with the view set? Thanks, Géza 2012/12/7 Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com: Hi, I'm not an expert on the Clear Case setups, but going through the code, we do this: cleartool lsview -full -properties -cview If we get an error, we won't show the repository. We then look through the output. If there's no Properties: with dynamic or snapshot, we fail. Otherwise, it should list the repository. Hope that in some way helps. Our Clear Case support is not really a first-class citizen. It's a series of contributions, but unfortunately not one I know a lot about. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Géza Kulcsár gesap...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! I checked and it really seems that path will be problem? Could you help me in providing correct path format? Do I only need /vobs/..., or I need a view name on top of it, or any other variation? I'm a bit confused, as your documentation mentions views somewhere, but your on-page hint states absolute path, which, from server point of view, would be /vobs/... Thanks, Géza Kulcsár 2012/12/6 Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com: Sorry, yes, cleartool. (It's a bit late here.) If cleartool is there, then yeah, it's probably a repository path problem. I'd see if there's any error information in the reviewboard.log file that indicates what may be going wrong. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 2:43 AM, Géza Kulcsár gesap...@gmail.com wrote: Do you mean cleartool? I assume then, that answer is yes. Unfortunately, I can only assume as I don't have direct access to server, I can only instruct the responsible technician. At first, when I tried to add vobs, there was an error message stating The executable cleartool is not in the path. I asked him to fix it, and it seemed that it works as I became able to add repos. The problem now is that they don't show up in the list. If cleartool is installed, could the cause still be that I'm not providing proper path information? Thanks, Géza Kulcsár 2012/12/6 Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com: Hey, Do you have the clearcase command line tool installed on the server? If it's not found, then it won't display. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Géza Kulcsár gesap...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! I'm trying to configure Review Board with ClearCase. I have successfully added a repository, but I'm not sure whether I'm giving path information in correct form. Could it affect if the repository showing or not in the list on New Review Request page? As I go there, there is nothing in the list but the default None option. Thanks, Best regards, Géza Kulcsár -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
Re: Configured repository doesn't show on New Review Request page
Hi! When command is issued from console in the desired vob directory, it gives correct output and even dynamic tag is found among Properties. But giving the same directory path as Repository Path, it still doesn't show. Do you know of any tricky options maybe of starting your application itself? It can be the last remaining root cause, as the command in itself works and the directory exists and reachable. In one of your earlier mails, you mentioned some reviewboard log. Could you please provide a path to it maybe so that I can request it more exactly from the server technician? Thanks, Géza 2012/12/10 Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com: Hi Géza, Sorry, I missed a crucial piece of information. That command is run from the directory specified by the Repository Path. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Géza Kulcsár gesap...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! It is a valuable piece of information, still, I have questions remained. 'cleartool lsview' with -cview flag presupposes that there is a view already set (-cview means current view). Do I need to provide the command which sets the view in the path field of the repo, or the application is already needed to be ran on the server with the view set? Thanks, Géza 2012/12/7 Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com: Hi, I'm not an expert on the Clear Case setups, but going through the code, we do this: cleartool lsview -full -properties -cview If we get an error, we won't show the repository. We then look through the output. If there's no Properties: with dynamic or snapshot, we fail. Otherwise, it should list the repository. Hope that in some way helps. Our Clear Case support is not really a first-class citizen. It's a series of contributions, but unfortunately not one I know a lot about. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Géza Kulcsár gesap...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! I checked and it really seems that path will be problem? Could you help me in providing correct path format? Do I only need /vobs/..., or I need a view name on top of it, or any other variation? I'm a bit confused, as your documentation mentions views somewhere, but your on-page hint states absolute path, which, from server point of view, would be /vobs/... Thanks, Géza Kulcsár 2012/12/6 Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com: Sorry, yes, cleartool. (It's a bit late here.) If cleartool is there, then yeah, it's probably a repository path problem. I'd see if there's any error information in the reviewboard.log file that indicates what may be going wrong. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 2:43 AM, Géza Kulcsár gesap...@gmail.com wrote: Do you mean cleartool? I assume then, that answer is yes. Unfortunately, I can only assume as I don't have direct access to server, I can only instruct the responsible technician. At first, when I tried to add vobs, there was an error message stating The executable cleartool is not in the path. I asked him to fix it, and it seemed that it works as I became able to add repos. The problem now is that they don't show up in the list. If cleartool is installed, could the cause still be that I'm not providing proper path information? Thanks, Géza Kulcsár 2012/12/6 Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com: Hey, Do you have the clearcase command line tool installed on the server? If it's not found, then it won't display. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Géza Kulcsár gesap...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! I'm trying to configure Review Board with ClearCase. I have successfully added a repository, but I'm not sure whether I'm giving path information in correct form. Could it affect if the repository showing or not in the list on New Review Request page? As I go there, there is nothing in the list but the default None option. Thanks, Best regards, Géza Kulcsár -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group
Fwd: ReviewBoard 1.7rc1 uploading diff hangs, server process loops
Hi all, I'm trying ReviewBoard 1.7rc1 with a Bazaar repository. I cannot add new review requests using a Bazaar diff: the upload process works, but no response comes (the hourglass never disappears). At the same time, each upload that is attempted causes one apache server process to loop apparently accessing the Bazaar server... The bazaar server at this time uses a lot of CPU, 100...150% and more. I traced one of the Apache processes and got: Process 24703 attached - interrupt to quit recvfrom(23, bzr message 3 (bzr 1.6)\n\0\0\0\34d16:..., 65536, 0, NULL, NULL) = 130 sendto(23, bzr message 3 (bzr 1.6)\n\0\0\0\34d16:..., 157, 0, NULL, 0) = 157 recvfrom(23, bzr message 3 (bzr 1.6)\n\0\0\0\34d16:..., 65536, 0, NULL, NULL) = 380 recvfrom(23, e, 65536, 0, NULL, NULL) = 1 sendto(23, bzr message 3 (bzr 1.6)\n\0\0\0\34d16:..., 165, 0, NULL, 0) = 165 recvfrom(23, bzr message 3 (bzr 1.6)\n\0\0\0\34d16:..., 65536, 0, NULL, NULL) = 115 sendto(23, bzr message 3 (bzr 1.6)\n\0\0\0\34d16:..., 142, 0, NULL, 0) = 142 recvfrom(23, bzr message 3 (bzr 1.6)\n\0\0\0\34d16:..., 65536, 0, NULL, NULL) = 387 recvfrom(23, e, 65536, 0, NULL, NULL) = 1 Any idea what goes wrong? Thanks, Frits Jalvingh -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: ReviewBoard 1.7rc1 uploading diff hangs, server process loops
Wow, that looks pretty bad. Is this by any chance a public repository we can test against? Is there anything in reviewboard.log relevant to this? Did you have this problem with other versions? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Frits Jalvingh j...@etc.to wrote: Hi all, I'm trying ReviewBoard 1.7rc1 with a Bazaar repository. I cannot add new review requests using a Bazaar diff: the upload process works, but no response comes (the hourglass never disappears). At the same time, each upload that is attempted causes one apache server process to loop apparently accessing the Bazaar server... The bazaar server at this time uses a lot of CPU, 100...150% and more. I traced one of the Apache processes and got: Process 24703 attached - interrupt to quit recvfrom(23, bzr message 3 (bzr 1.6)\n\0\0\0\34d16:..., 65536, 0, NULL, NULL) = 130 sendto(23, bzr message 3 (bzr 1.6)\n\0\0\0\34d16:..., 157, 0, NULL, 0) = 157 recvfrom(23, bzr message 3 (bzr 1.6)\n\0\0\0\34d16:..., 65536, 0, NULL, NULL) = 380 recvfrom(23, e, 65536, 0, NULL, NULL) = 1 sendto(23, bzr message 3 (bzr 1.6)\n\0\0\0\34d16:..., 165, 0, NULL, 0) = 165 recvfrom(23, bzr message 3 (bzr 1.6)\n\0\0\0\34d16:..., 65536, 0, NULL, NULL) = 115 sendto(23, bzr message 3 (bzr 1.6)\n\0\0\0\34d16:..., 142, 0, NULL, 0) = 142 recvfrom(23, bzr message 3 (bzr 1.6)\n\0\0\0\34d16:..., 65536, 0, NULL, NULL) = 387 recvfrom(23, e, 65536, 0, NULL, NULL) = 1 Any idea what goes wrong? Thanks, Frits Jalvingh -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Issue 2820 in reviewboard: bitnami-review-board upload .diff file, show 'broken files'
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2820 by yunfeng2...@gmail.com: bitnami-review-board upload .diff file, show 'broken files' http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2820 * NOTE: For customer support, please post to * * reviewbo...@googlegroups.com * ** * Do not post confidential information in this bug report. * * If you need immediate support, please contact* * reviewbo...@googlegroups.com * What version are you running? bitnami_review board What's the URL of the page containing the problem? What steps will reproduce the problem? 1.upload diff 2. 3. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? What operating system are you using? What browser? Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
