Re: 504 Gateway Timeout

2016-05-13 Thread Christian Hammond 
Hi,

At what point do you see this? When loading the New Review Request page, or
browsing commits, or...? Can you walk through every step?

Also, what type of repository, and where is it hosted?

Christian


On Friday, May 13, 2016, Abhishek Choudhary  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am seeing gateway timeout error with my reviewboard setup whenever i try
> to create a new request using 'New Review Request
> ' option. Dashboard loads up
> pretty quickly and other functionalities are working fine. The problem
> occurs with new request only.
>
> Server info:
> Apache/2.4.6 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux) OpenSSL/1.0.1e-fips
> mod_auth_kerb/5.4 mod_wsgi/4.4.11 Python/2.7.11 Server
>
> I am not sure where to start looking for the issue. Has anyone seen this
> error before?
>
> Please help!
>
> Thanks,
> Abhishek
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "reviewboard" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>


-- 
-- 
Christian Hammond
President/CEO of Beanbag 
Makers of Review Board 

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: A weird unicode puzzle after upgrade from 2.0.20 to 2.5.4

2016-05-13 Thread Christian Hammond 
Hi Eric,

Hmm, we'll need to look into that. Is there a way you'd be able to send us
the diff for that? (I can help you find it.) We will need a copy in order
to diagnose this. We can sign an NDA for it.

Christian


On Friday, May 13, 2016, eric via reviewboard 
wrote:

> After I migrated my server to 2.5.4, I'm seeing a weird error. I restarted
> both memcached and apache2, and then browse to a specific review request.
>
> Then I click on the "Diff" tab. (After I turned on DEBUG = True in the
> settings_local.py file) I see this instead of diffs.
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py",
> line 275, in get
> response = renderer.render_to_response(request)
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/renderers.py",
> line 56, in render_to_response
> return HttpResponse(self.render_to_string(request))
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/renderers.py",
> line 74, in render_to_string
> large_data=True)
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.9.3-py2.7.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py",
> line 295, in cache_memoize
> compress_large_data))
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.9.3-py2.7.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py",
> line 249, in cache_memoize_iter
> items = items_or_callable()
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.9.3-py2.7.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py",
> line 292, in 
> lambda: [lookup_callable()],
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/renderers.py",
> line 73, in 
> lambda: self.render_to_string_uncached(request),
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/renderers.py",
> line 87, in render_to_string_uncached
> request=request)
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py",
> line 429, in populate_diff_chunks
> chunks = list(generator.get_chunks())
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py",
> line 756, in get_chunks
> for chunk in super(DiffChunkGenerator, self).get_chunks(cache_key):
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py",
> line 107, in get_chunks
> large_data=True)
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.9.3-py2.7.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py",
> line 295, in cache_memoize
> compress_large_data))
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.9.3-py2.7.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py",
> line 249, in cache_memoize_iter
> items = items_or_callable()
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.9.3-py2.7.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py",
> line 292, in 
> lambda: [lookup_callable()],
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py",
> line 106, in 
> lambda: list(self.get_chunks_uncached()),
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py",
> line 763, in get_chunks_uncached
> new = get_patched_file(old, self.filediff, self.request)
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py",
> line 230, in get_patched_file
> diff = tool.normalize_patch(filediff.diff, filediff.source_file,
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/models.py",
> line 218, in _get_diff
> self._migrate_diff_data()
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/models.py",
> line 421, in _migrate_diff_data
> diff_hash_is_new = self._set_diff(self.legacy_diff_hash.binary)
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/models.py",
> line 225, in _set_diff
> RawFileDiffData.objects.get_or_create_from_data(diff)
>   File
> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/managers.py",
> line 345, in get_or_create_from_data
> 'compression': compression,
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/manager.py",
> line 154, in get_or_create
> return self.get_queryset().get_or_create(**kwargs)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py",
> line 383, in get_or_create
> obj.save(force_insert=True, using=self.db)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/base.py", line
> 545, in save
> force_update=force_update, update_fields=update_fields)
>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/base.py", line
> 573, in save_base
>

A weird unicode puzzle after upgrade from 2.0.20 to 2.5.4

2016-05-13 Thread eric via reviewboard 
After I migrated my server to 2.5.4, I'm seeing a weird error. I restarted 
both memcached and apache2, and then browse to a specific review request.

Then I click on the "Diff" tab. (After I turned on DEBUG = True in the 
settings_local.py file) I see this instead of diffs.

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py",
 
line 275, in get
response = renderer.render_to_response(request)
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/renderers.py",
 
line 56, in render_to_response
return HttpResponse(self.render_to_string(request))
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/renderers.py",
 
line 74, in render_to_string
large_data=True)
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.9.3-py2.7.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py",
 
line 295, in cache_memoize
compress_large_data))
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.9.3-py2.7.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py",
 
line 249, in cache_memoize_iter
items = items_or_callable()
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.9.3-py2.7.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py",
 
line 292, in 
lambda: [lookup_callable()],
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/renderers.py",
 
line 73, in 
lambda: self.render_to_string_uncached(request),
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/renderers.py",
 
line 87, in render_to_string_uncached
request=request)
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py",
 
line 429, in populate_diff_chunks
chunks = list(generator.get_chunks())
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py",
 
line 756, in get_chunks
for chunk in super(DiffChunkGenerator, self).get_chunks(cache_key):
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py",
 
line 107, in get_chunks
large_data=True)
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.9.3-py2.7.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py",
 
line 295, in cache_memoize
compress_large_data))
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.9.3-py2.7.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py",
 
line 249, in cache_memoize_iter
items = items_or_callable()
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.9.3-py2.7.egg/djblets/cache/backend.py",
 
line 292, in 
lambda: [lookup_callable()],
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py",
 
line 106, in 
lambda: list(self.get_chunks_uncached()),
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/chunk_generator.py",
 
line 763, in get_chunks_uncached
new = get_patched_file(old, self.filediff, self.request)
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py",
 
line 230, in get_patched_file
diff = tool.normalize_patch(filediff.diff, filediff.source_file,
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/models.py",
 
line 218, in _get_diff
self._migrate_diff_data()
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/models.py",
 
line 421, in _migrate_diff_data
diff_hash_is_new = self._set_diff(self.legacy_diff_hash.binary)
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/models.py",
 
line 225, in _set_diff
RawFileDiffData.objects.get_or_create_from_data(diff)
  File 
"/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-2.5.4-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/managers.py",
 
line 345, in get_or_create_from_data
'compression': compression,
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/manager.py", 
line 154, in get_or_create
return self.get_queryset().get_or_create(**kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py", line 
383, in get_or_create
obj.save(force_insert=True, using=self.db)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/base.py", line 
545, in save
force_update=force_update, update_fields=update_fields)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/base.py", line 
573, in save_base
updated = self._save_table(raw, cls, force_insert, force_update, using, 
update_fields)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/base.py", line 
654, in _save_table
result = self._do_insert(cls._base_manager, using, fields, update_pk, 
raw)
  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/base.py", line 
687, in _do_insert
using=using, raw=raw)
  File

Re: Search showing incomplete results (v. 2.5.4, just rebuilt indices)

2016-05-13 Thread eric via reviewboard 
Ugh. Me with egg on my face.

My automated script to perform the indexing, and turn on searching - turns 
out I had a typo.

Eric.

On Thursday, May 12, 2016 at 5:08:04 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> Just to check, is Search enabled in Settings?
>
> The auto-complete won't show results from the search index. You'll have to 
> hit enter to see the results. We're changing this for 3.0 (along with 
> adding on-the-fly search indexing).
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag 
> Makers of Review Board 
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:07 AM, eric via reviewboard <
> revie...@googlegroups.com > wrote:
>
>> I'm getting ready to roll out the latest ReviewBoard for my company. 
>> Upgrade went smoothly. Looks like you've even fully integrated a patch I 
>> submitted a while back (thanks for that!)
>>
>> While I was at it, I figured I should turn on indexing for the first time.
>>
>> After doing a:
>>
>> rb-site manage ${path_to_instance} -- rebuild_index
>>
>> After switching to view "all requests", I start typing in the search box, 
>> and it doesn't match against some of the items I can see on my first page 
>> of all available requests.
>>
>> In particular, I'm interested in searching for bug numbers. Sometimes my 
>> users put these in the summary of a review request, and some times they put 
>> it in the Bugs field. Whether or not a bug number is listed in the Bugs 
>> field appears to have no affect on whether it gets properly indexed for 
>> search.
>>
>> What's going on? Any tips for troubleshooting?
>>
>> Eric.
>>
>> -- 
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

504 Gateway Timeout

2016-05-13 Thread Abhishek Choudhary 
Hi,

I am seeing gateway timeout error with my reviewboard setup whenever i try 
to create a new request using 'New Review Request 
' option. Dashboard loads up 
pretty quickly and other functionalities are working fine. The problem 
occurs with new request only.

Server info:
Apache/2.4.6 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux) OpenSSL/1.0.1e-fips 
mod_auth_kerb/5.4 mod_wsgi/4.4.11 Python/2.7.11 Server

I am not sure where to start looking for the issue. Has anyone seen this 
error before?

Please help!

Thanks,
Abhishek

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.