Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-25 Thread Phil Hom
We upgraded from 1.6.3 to 1.6.10, everything looks good.
Except the Authentication Settings page only shows Standard Reg and Legacy, 
no LDAP, AD, or others.

Is there something I'm misssing.
THanks.

Phil

On Sunday, July 22, 2012 1:20:30 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hey everyone,

 We just released Review Board 1.6.10, which, amongst other things, is a 
 pretty speedy release.

 A lot of work went into this release to drastically speed up nearly every 
 page. There's more to do, but the improvement should be noticeable. Given 
 the extensive changes that happened under the hood for this, we'd be very 
 interested in knowing if you hit any problems.

 There are some other great little improvements and fixes. See 
 http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/07/22/review-board-1610-released/for 
 more information.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-25 Thread Christian Hammond
Did you upgrade using pip or easy_install?

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Phil Hom phil...@gmail.com wrote:

 We upgraded from 1.6.3 to 1.6.10, everything looks good.
 Except the Authentication Settings page only shows Standard Reg and
 Legacy, no LDAP, AD, or others.

 Is there something I'm misssing.
 THanks.

 Phil


 On Sunday, July 22, 2012 1:20:30 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hey everyone,

 We just released Review Board 1.6.10, which, amongst other things, is a
 pretty speedy release.

 A lot of work went into this release to drastically speed up nearly every
 page. There's more to do, but the improvement should be noticeable. Given
 the extensive changes that happened under the hood for this, we'd be very
 interested in knowing if you hit any problems.

 There are some other great little improvements and fixes. See
 http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/07/22/review-board-**
 1610-released/http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/07/22/review-board-1610-released/for
  more information.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com



-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-25 Thread Phil Hom
We grabed the gzips from the releases directory and created RPMs for 
DJblets 0.6.21 and reviewboard 1.6.10,
then installed the RPMs, then ran  rb-site upgrade.

We used RPMs before for 1.6.3, so continued doing it this way just in case 
we need to back out.

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 1:05:27 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Did you upgrade using pip or easy_install?

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


 On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Phil Hom phil...@gmail.com wrote:

 We upgraded from 1.6.3 to 1.6.10, everything looks good.
 Except the Authentication Settings page only shows Standard Reg and 
 Legacy, no LDAP, AD, or others.

 Is there something I'm misssing.
 THanks.

 Phil


 On Sunday, July 22, 2012 1:20:30 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hey everyone,

 We just released Review Board 1.6.10, which, amongst other things, is a 
 pretty speedy release.

 A lot of work went into this release to drastically speed up nearly 
 every page. There's more to do, but the improvement should be noticeable. 
 Given the extensive changes that happened under the hood for this, we'd be 
 very interested in knowing if you hit any problems.

 There are some other great little improvements and fixes. See 
 http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/07/22/review-board-**
 1610-released/http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/07/22/review-board-1610-released/for
  more information.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com




-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-25 Thread Christian Hammond
We make use of setuptools-provided Python Entrypoints, which register some
scannable bits of data for things like authentication modules. It sounds
like those registrations got lost somehow in your packaging.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Phil Hom phil...@gmail.com wrote:

 We grabed the gzips from the releases directory and created RPMs for
 DJblets 0.6.21 and reviewboard 1.6.10,
 then installed the RPMs, then ran  rb-site upgrade.

 We used RPMs before for 1.6.3, so continued doing it this way just in case
 we need to back out.


 On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 1:05:27 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Did you upgrade using pip or easy_install?

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


 On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Phil Hom phil...@gmail.com wrote:

 We upgraded from 1.6.3 to 1.6.10, everything looks good.
 Except the Authentication Settings page only shows Standard Reg and
 Legacy, no LDAP, AD, or others.

 Is there something I'm misssing.
 THanks.

 Phil


 On Sunday, July 22, 2012 1:20:30 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hey everyone,

 We just released Review Board 1.6.10, which, amongst other things, is a
 pretty speedy release.

 A lot of work went into this release to drastically speed up nearly
 every page. There's more to do, but the improvement should be noticeable.
 Given the extensive changes that happened under the hood for this, we'd be
 very interested in knowing if you hit any problems.

 There are some other great little improvements and fixes. See
 http://www.reviewboard.org/**new**s/2012/07/22/review-board-**1610**
 -released/http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/07/22/review-board-1610-released/for
  more information.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


  --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-25 Thread Phil Hom
The problem turned out to be the RPM spec file for reviewboard listed 
Djblets 0.6.20, while we upgraded to 0.6.21.
There were auth module errors in the reviewboard log.

This has been fixed by re-rolling the reviewboard RPM.

Thanks for your help.

Phil 

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 2:00:36 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:

 We make use of setuptools-provided Python Entrypoints, which register some 
 scannable bits of data for things like authentication modules. It sounds 
 like those registrations got lost somehow in your packaging.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


 On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Phil Hom phil...@gmail.com wrote:

 We grabed the gzips from the releases directory and created RPMs for 
 DJblets 0.6.21 and reviewboard 1.6.10,
 then installed the RPMs, then ran  rb-site upgrade.

 We used RPMs before for 1.6.3, so continued doing it this way just in 
 case we need to back out.


 On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 1:05:27 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Did you upgrade using pip or easy_install?

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


 On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Phil Hom phil...@gmail.com wrote:

 We upgraded from 1.6.3 to 1.6.10, everything looks good.
 Except the Authentication Settings page only shows Standard Reg and 
 Legacy, no LDAP, AD, or others.

 Is there something I'm misssing.
 THanks.

 Phil


 On Sunday, July 22, 2012 1:20:30 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hey everyone,

 We just released Review Board 1.6.10, which, amongst other things, is 
 a pretty speedy release.

 A lot of work went into this release to drastically speed up nearly 
 every page. There's more to do, but the improvement should be noticeable. 
 Given the extensive changes that happened under the hood for this, we'd 
 be 
 very interested in knowing if you hit any problems.

 There are some other great little improvements and fixes. See 
 http://www.reviewboard.org/**new**s/2012/07/22/review-board-**1610**
 -released/http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/07/22/review-board-1610-released/for
  more information.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


  -- 
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en




-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-24 Thread Christian Hammond
Are you able to edit existing non-drafts?

Christian



On Jul 24, 2012, at 3:44, Alex Postlethwaite alexpostlethwa...@gmail.com 
wrote:

 I'm having the same problem.
 
 On the outgoing requests page, the new review is tagged with [Draft].
 
 There we no javascript errors during page load (using Chrome).
 I did do an rb-site upgrade and it completed with no errors.
 
 On Monday, 23 July 2012 15:38:06 UTC+1, Darryl McCutcheon wrote:
 
 I had an issue when I upgraded this morning that none of the users could edit 
 their review, or mark their reviews as closed (submitted or discarded).
 
 I ended up creating a perm group with enough rights, then added all the users 
 to the group.  Seems to have temporarily solved the problem.
 
 On Sunday, 22 July 2012 04:20:30 UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
 Hey everyone,
 
 We just released Review Board 1.6.10, which, amongst other things, is a 
 pretty speedy release.
 
 A lot of work went into this release to drastically speed up nearly every 
 page. There's more to do, but the improvement should be noticeable. Given the 
 extensive changes that happened under the hood for this, we'd be very 
 interested in knowing if you hit any problems.
 
 There are some other great little improvements and fixes. See 
 http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/07/22/review-board-1610-released/ for 
 more information.
 
 Christian
 
 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-24 Thread Christian Hammond
Also, can you e-mail me a screenshot? In private is fine.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@gmail.comwrote:

 Are you able to edit existing non-drafts?

 Christian



 On Jul 24, 2012, at 3:44, Alex Postlethwaite alexpostlethwa...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 I'm having the same problem.

 On the outgoing requests page, the new review is tagged with [Draft].

 There we no javascript errors during page load (using Chrome).
 I did do an rb-site upgrade and it completed with no errors.

 On Monday, 23 July 2012 15:38:06 UTC+1, Darryl McCutcheon wrote:


 I had an issue when I upgraded this morning that none of the users could
 edit their review, or mark their reviews as closed (submitted or discarded).

 I ended up creating a perm group with enough rights, then added all the
 users to the group.  Seems to have temporarily solved the problem.

 On Sunday, 22 July 2012 04:20:30 UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hey everyone,

 We just released Review Board 1.6.10, which, amongst other things, is a
 pretty speedy release.

 A lot of work went into this release to drastically speed up nearly
 every page. There's more to do, but the improvement should be noticeable.
 Given the extensive changes that happened under the hood for this, we'd be
 very interested in knowing if you hit any problems.

 There are some other great little improvements and fixes. See
 http://www.reviewboard.org/**news/2012/07/22/review-board-**
 1610-released/http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/07/22/review-board-1610-released/for
  more information.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com



-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-24 Thread Alex Postlethwaite
Thanks. I'll try the update when I'm back at work.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-23 Thread whatever
So I upgraded from 1.6.9 yesterday, but rbssh.py was having issues.

It couldn't get past the following import:

from reviewboard.scmtools import sshutils


I didn't have time to figure out the problem as I needed to get it back up 
last night, so I went back to 1.6.9.  I should be able to try again later 
this week.

- Chuck

On Sunday, July 22, 2012 4:20:30 AM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hey everyone,

 We just released Review Board 1.6.10, which, amongst other things, is a 
 pretty speedy release.

 A lot of work went into this release to drastically speed up nearly every 
 page. There's more to do, but the improvement should be noticeable. Given 
 the extensive changes that happened under the hood for this, we'd be very 
 interested in knowing if you hit any problems.

 There are some other great little improvements and fixes. See 
 http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/07/22/review-board-1610-released/for 
 more information.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-23 Thread Christian Hammond
By the way, if there are people who upgraded to this release and aren't 
experiencing errors, that'd be a great datapoint to have.

Christian



On Jul 23, 2012, at 11:48, Christian Hammond chip...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'd be interested in knowing if there were any JavaScript errors.
 
 Did you do rb-site upgrade?
 
 Christian
 
 
 On Jul 23, 2012, at 7:38, Darryl McCutcheon dar...@themccutcheons.ca wrote:
 
 
 I had an issue when I upgraded this morning that none of the users could 
 edit their review, or mark their reviews as closed (submitted or discarded).
 
 I ended up creating a perm group with enough rights, then added all the 
 users to the group.  Seems to have temporarily solved the problem.
 
 On Sunday, 22 July 2012 04:20:30 UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
 Hey everyone,
 
 We just released Review Board 1.6.10, which, amongst other things, is a 
 pretty speedy release.
 
 A lot of work went into this release to drastically speed up nearly every 
 page. There's more to do, but the improvement should be noticeable. Given 
 the extensive changes that happened under the hood for this, we'd be very 
 interested in knowing if you hit any problems.
 
 There are some other great little improvements and fixes. See 
 http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/07/22/review-board-1610-released/ for 
 more information.
 
 Christian
 
 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
 -- 
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Review Board 1.6.10 released

2012-07-23 Thread whatever
I'll update when I get another chance to try later this week.  I'm sure 
it's something simple.

On Monday, July 23, 2012 4:10:18 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:

 This doesn't sound like something in the code, but rather a setup issue on 
 your server. If that import fails, my guess is that 1.6.10 isn't anywhere 
 in the python path.

 Christian



 On Jul 23, 2012, at 5:47, whatever chuckbut...@gmail.com wrote:

 So I upgraded from 1.6.9 yesterday, but rbssh.py was having issues.

 It couldn't get past the following import:

 from reviewboard.scmtools import sshutils


 I didn't have time to figure out the problem as I needed to get it back up 
 last night, so I went back to 1.6.9.  I should be able to try again later 
 this week.

 - Chuck

 On Sunday, July 22, 2012 4:20:30 AM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hey everyone,

 We just released Review Board 1.6.10, which, amongst other things, is a 
 pretty speedy release.

 A lot of work went into this release to drastically speed up nearly every 
 page. There's more to do, but the improvement should be noticeable. Given 
 the extensive changes that happened under the hood for this, we'd be very 
 interested in knowing if you hit any problems.

 There are some other great little improvements and fixes. See 
 http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/07/22/review-board-1610-released/for 
 more information.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com

  -- 
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en



-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en