Re: Review Board GitLab integration not working (missing Repository Plan)

2018-04-17 Thread Christian Hammond 
Sounds like maybe the site directory got moved somewhere, and it was using
the older paths. Either way, glad it's working now!

Christian

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 5:34 PM, 'Selim Tuvi' via Review Board Community <
reviewboard@googlegroups.com> wrote:

> Ok, finally figured it out. Somehow under site configuration, the
> following entries were set incorrectly:
>
>   "site_media_root": "/var/www/html/pe-reviewboard-sf-01v/htdocs/media",
>   "site_static_root": "/var/www/html/pe-reviewboard-sf-01v/htdocs/static",
>
> Instead of "/var/www/html/pe-reviewboard-sf-01v/..." they were pointing
> at "/var/www/pe-reviewboard-sf-01v/..."
>
> Not sure how and when this change happened but it is all good now.
>
> Thanks
> -Selim
>
>
> On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 5:06:58 PM UTC-7, Selim Tuvi wrote:
>>
>> I have now changed all folders leading to "avatars" to be owned by
>> apache:apache, the avatar image files are now being created but the web
>> server is not able to access them:
>>
>> 10.66.43.212 - - [18/Apr/2018:00:02:05 +] "GET
>> /media/uploaded/avatars/s/st/stuvi__422164f6-ca3f-4dad-b47e-6da5c54c3eaa.jpg
>> HTTP/1.1" 404 273 "http://pe-reviewboard-sf-01v/account/preferences/;
>> "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko)
>> Chrome/63.0.3239.132 Safari/537.36"
>>
>> [root@pe-reviewboard-sf-01v st]# ls -al /var/www/pe-reviewboard-sf-01v
>> /htdocs/media/uploaded/avatars/s/st/stuvi__422164f6-ca3f-
>> 4dad-b47e-6da5c54c3eaa.jpg
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 179553 Apr 17 17:02
>> /var/www/pe-reviewboard-sf-01v/htdocs/media/uploaded/avatars
>> /s/st/stuvi__422164f6-ca3f-4dad-b47e-6da5c54c3eaa.jpg
>>
>> -Selim
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 4:19:06 PM UTC-7, Selim Tuvi wrote:
>>>
>>> I made sure that each directory in the hierarchy is owned by owner
>>> "apache" group "root". The permissions are "drwxr-xr-x". There is an
>>> ".htaccess" file under $sitedir/htdocs/media that is owned by root. Could
>>> that be causing a problem?
>>>
>>> -Selim
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 2:44:20 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hi Selim,

 With GitLab, you don't need any kind of file access to the repository,
 and don't need cgit/GitWeb. Those are only required for standalone Git
 repositories. Glad it's working :)

 Avatar images should upload fine so long as directory permissions are
 correct throughout $sitedir/htdocs/media/uploaded/. What are you
 seeing?

 Christian

 On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:01 AM, 'Selim Tuvi' via Review Board
 Community  wrote:

> Hi Christian, we just tried 3.0.6 and it works out of the box with our
> GitLab server without having to use cgit/GitWeb and we don't have the
> repositories directly accessible via file paths. So somehow the API access
> works fine!
>
> Also, do you know why we can not upload any avatar images? Is that a
> known issue?
>
> Thanks
> -Selim
>
>
> On Monday, April 16, 2018 at 1:43:54 PM UTC-7, Selim Tuvi wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Christian, we'll give 3.0.5 a try.
>>
>> -Selim
>>
>> On Friday, March 23, 2018 at 12:49:40 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We had a regression that came up very late in the release and broke
>>> part of the repository form. We just put out 3.0.5 (announcements 
>>> coming in
>>> the morning) that address this. Try upgrading and see if it works any
>>> better for you.
>>>
>>> For self-hosted Git repositories not directly accessible via file
>>> paths by the Review Board server, you do need cgit/GitWeb. The reason is
>>> that Git's network protocol is *very* limited, and doesn't allow the 
>>> same
>>> kind of queries that most other types of source code management systems
>>> use. We have a new, open source product in the works designed to give
>>> self-hosted Git repositories a functional API and deeper integration 
>>> hooks.
>>> We're working on some of the last bits needed before we can release 
>>> that.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:16 AM, 'Selim Tuvi' via Review Board
>>> Community  wrote:
>>>
 Hi, we are in the process of evaluating Review Board 3.0.4 and
 wanted to try the GitLab integration.

 We have a self hosted GitLab CE installatin. When I try to add the
 repository, I don't get to pick any values from the "Repository Plan". 
 See
 attached image.

 And if I try to save it, I get an error about the plan.

 Also, I read here
 
 that for self hosted Git repositories we need to use GitWeb or cgit. Is
 that still the case?

Re: Review Board GitLab integration not working (missing Repository Plan)

2018-04-17 Thread 'Selim Tuvi' via Review Board Community 
Ok, finally figured it out. Somehow under site configuration, the following 
entries were set incorrectly:

  "site_media_root": "/var/www/html/pe-reviewboard-sf-01v/htdocs/media",
  "site_static_root": "/var/www/html/pe-reviewboard-sf-01v/htdocs/static",

Instead of "/var/www/html/pe-reviewboard-sf-01v/..." they were pointing at 
"/var/www/pe-reviewboard-sf-01v/..."

Not sure how and when this change happened but it is all good now.

Thanks
-Selim

On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 5:06:58 PM UTC-7, Selim Tuvi wrote:
>
> I have now changed all folders leading to "avatars" to be owned by 
> apache:apache, the avatar image files are now being created but the web 
> server is not able to access them:
>
> 10.66.43.212 - - [18/Apr/2018:00:02:05 +] "GET 
> /media/uploaded/avatars/s/st/stuvi__422164f6-ca3f-4dad-b47e-6da5c54c3eaa.jpg 
> HTTP/1.1" 404 273 "http://pe-reviewboard-sf-01v/account/preferences/; 
> "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) 
> Chrome/63.0.3239.132 Safari/537.36"
>
> [root@pe-reviewboard-sf-01v st]# ls -al 
> /var/www/pe-reviewboard-sf-01v/htdocs/media/uploaded/avatars/s/st/stuvi__422164f6-ca3f-4dad-b47e-6da5c54c3eaa.jpg
> -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 179553 Apr 17 17:02 
> /var/www/pe-reviewboard-sf-01v/htdocs/media/uploaded/avatars/s/st/stuvi__422164f6-ca3f-4dad-b47e-6da5c54c3eaa.jpg
>
> -Selim
>
> On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 4:19:06 PM UTC-7, Selim Tuvi wrote:
>>
>> I made sure that each directory in the hierarchy is owned by owner 
>> "apache" group "root". The permissions are "drwxr-xr-x". There is an 
>> ".htaccess" file under $sitedir/htdocs/media that is owned by root. Could 
>> that be causing a problem?
>>
>> -Selim
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 2:44:20 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Selim,
>>>
>>> With GitLab, you don't need any kind of file access to the repository, 
>>> and don't need cgit/GitWeb. Those are only required for standalone Git 
>>> repositories. Glad it's working :)
>>>
>>> Avatar images should upload fine so long as directory permissions are 
>>> correct throughout $sitedir/htdocs/media/uploaded/. What are you seeing?
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:01 AM, 'Selim Tuvi' via Review Board 
>>> Community  wrote:
>>>
 Hi Christian, we just tried 3.0.6 and it works out of the box with our 
 GitLab server without having to use cgit/GitWeb and we don't have the 
 repositories directly accessible via file paths. So somehow the API access 
 works fine!

 Also, do you know why we can not upload any avatar images? Is that a 
 known issue?

 Thanks
 -Selim


 On Monday, April 16, 2018 at 1:43:54 PM UTC-7, Selim Tuvi wrote:
>
> Thank you Christian, we'll give 3.0.5 a try.
>
> -Selim
>
> On Friday, March 23, 2018 at 12:49:40 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond 
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We had a regression that came up very late in the release and broke 
>> part of the repository form. We just put out 3.0.5 (announcements coming 
>> in 
>> the morning) that address this. Try upgrading and see if it works any 
>> better for you.
>>
>> For self-hosted Git repositories not directly accessible via file 
>> paths by the Review Board server, you do need cgit/GitWeb. The reason is 
>> that Git's network protocol is *very* limited, and doesn't allow the 
>> same 
>> kind of queries that most other types of source code management systems 
>> use. We have a new, open source product in the works designed to give 
>> self-hosted Git repositories a functional API and deeper integration 
>> hooks. 
>> We're working on some of the last bits needed before we can release that.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:16 AM, 'Selim Tuvi' via Review Board 
>> Community  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, we are in the process of evaluating Review Board 3.0.4 and 
>>> wanted to try the GitLab integration.
>>>
>>> We have a self hosted GitLab CE installatin. When I try to add the 
>>> repository, I don't get to pick any values from the "Repository Plan". 
>>> See 
>>> attached image.
>>>
>>> And if I try to save it, I get an error about the plan.
>>>
>>> Also, I read here 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> that for self hosted Git repositories we need to use GitWeb or cgit. Is 
>>> that still the case?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Selim
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>>> https://rbcommons.com/
>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message

Re: Review Board GitLab integration not working (missing Repository Plan)

2018-04-17 Thread 'Selim Tuvi' via Review Board Community 
I have now changed all folders leading to "avatars" to be owned by 
apache:apache, the avatar image files are now being created but the web 
server is not able to access them:

10.66.43.212 - - [18/Apr/2018:00:02:05 +] "GET 
/media/uploaded/avatars/s/st/stuvi__422164f6-ca3f-4dad-b47e-6da5c54c3eaa.jpg 
HTTP/1.1" 404 273 "http://pe-reviewboard-sf-01v/account/preferences/; 
"Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) 
Chrome/63.0.3239.132 Safari/537.36"

[root@pe-reviewboard-sf-01v st]# ls -al 
/var/www/pe-reviewboard-sf-01v/htdocs/media/uploaded/avatars/s/st/stuvi__422164f6-ca3f-4dad-b47e-6da5c54c3eaa.jpg
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 179553 Apr 17 17:02 
/var/www/pe-reviewboard-sf-01v/htdocs/media/uploaded/avatars/s/st/stuvi__422164f6-ca3f-4dad-b47e-6da5c54c3eaa.jpg

-Selim

On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 4:19:06 PM UTC-7, Selim Tuvi wrote:
>
> I made sure that each directory in the hierarchy is owned by owner 
> "apache" group "root". The permissions are "drwxr-xr-x". There is an 
> ".htaccess" file under $sitedir/htdocs/media that is owned by root. Could 
> that be causing a problem?
>
> -Selim
>
> On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 2:44:20 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>> Hi Selim,
>>
>> With GitLab, you don't need any kind of file access to the repository, 
>> and don't need cgit/GitWeb. Those are only required for standalone Git 
>> repositories. Glad it's working :)
>>
>> Avatar images should upload fine so long as directory permissions are 
>> correct throughout $sitedir/htdocs/media/uploaded/. What are you seeing?
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:01 AM, 'Selim Tuvi' via Review Board Community 
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Christian, we just tried 3.0.6 and it works out of the box with our 
>>> GitLab server without having to use cgit/GitWeb and we don't have the 
>>> repositories directly accessible via file paths. So somehow the API access 
>>> works fine!
>>>
>>> Also, do you know why we can not upload any avatar images? Is that a 
>>> known issue?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Selim
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, April 16, 2018 at 1:43:54 PM UTC-7, Selim Tuvi wrote:

 Thank you Christian, we'll give 3.0.5 a try.

 -Selim

 On Friday, March 23, 2018 at 12:49:40 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We had a regression that came up very late in the release and broke 
> part of the repository form. We just put out 3.0.5 (announcements coming 
> in 
> the morning) that address this. Try upgrading and see if it works any 
> better for you.
>
> For self-hosted Git repositories not directly accessible via file 
> paths by the Review Board server, you do need cgit/GitWeb. The reason is 
> that Git's network protocol is *very* limited, and doesn't allow the same 
> kind of queries that most other types of source code management systems 
> use. We have a new, open source product in the works designed to give 
> self-hosted Git repositories a functional API and deeper integration 
> hooks. 
> We're working on some of the last bits needed before we can release that.
>
> Christian
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:16 AM, 'Selim Tuvi' via Review Board 
> Community  wrote:
>
>> Hi, we are in the process of evaluating Review Board 3.0.4 and wanted 
>> to try the GitLab integration.
>>
>> We have a self hosted GitLab CE installatin. When I try to add the 
>> repository, I don't get to pick any values from the "Repository Plan". 
>> See 
>> attached image.
>>
>> And if I try to save it, I get an error about the plan.
>>
>> Also, I read here 
>> 
>>  
>> that for self hosted Git repositories we need to use GitWeb or cgit. Is 
>> that still the case?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Selim
>>
>> -- 
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups "Review Board Community" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>> send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag 
> Makers of Review Board 
>
 -- 
>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>>>

Re: Review Board GitLab integration not working (missing Repository Plan)

2018-04-17 Thread 'Selim Tuvi' via Review Board Community 
I made sure that each directory in the hierarchy is owned by owner "apache" 
group "root". The permissions are "drwxr-xr-x". There is an ".htaccess" 
file under $sitedir/htdocs/media that is owned by root. Could that be 
causing a problem?

-Selim

On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 2:44:20 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Selim,
>
> With GitLab, you don't need any kind of file access to the repository, and 
> don't need cgit/GitWeb. Those are only required for standalone Git 
> repositories. Glad it's working :)
>
> Avatar images should upload fine so long as directory permissions are 
> correct throughout $sitedir/htdocs/media/uploaded/. What are you seeing?
>
> Christian
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:01 AM, 'Selim Tuvi' via Review Board Community 
>  wrote:
>
>> Hi Christian, we just tried 3.0.6 and it works out of the box with our 
>> GitLab server without having to use cgit/GitWeb and we don't have the 
>> repositories directly accessible via file paths. So somehow the API access 
>> works fine!
>>
>> Also, do you know why we can not upload any avatar images? Is that a 
>> known issue?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Selim
>>
>>
>> On Monday, April 16, 2018 at 1:43:54 PM UTC-7, Selim Tuvi wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you Christian, we'll give 3.0.5 a try.
>>>
>>> -Selim
>>>
>>> On Friday, March 23, 2018 at 12:49:40 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hi,

 We had a regression that came up very late in the release and broke 
 part of the repository form. We just put out 3.0.5 (announcements coming 
 in 
 the morning) that address this. Try upgrading and see if it works any 
 better for you.

 For self-hosted Git repositories not directly accessible via file paths 
 by the Review Board server, you do need cgit/GitWeb. The reason is that 
 Git's network protocol is *very* limited, and doesn't allow the same kind 
 of queries that most other types of source code management systems use. We 
 have a new, open source product in the works designed to give self-hosted 
 Git repositories a functional API and deeper integration hooks. We're 
 working on some of the last bits needed before we can release that.

 Christian

 On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:16 AM, 'Selim Tuvi' via Review Board 
 Community  wrote:

> Hi, we are in the process of evaluating Review Board 3.0.4 and wanted 
> to try the GitLab integration.
>
> We have a self hosted GitLab CE installatin. When I try to add the 
> repository, I don't get to pick any values from the "Repository Plan". 
> See 
> attached image.
>
> And if I try to save it, I get an error about the plan.
>
> Also, I read here 
> 
>  
> that for self hosted Git repositories we need to use GitWeb or cgit. Is 
> that still the case?
>
> Thanks
> -Selim
>
> -- 
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "Review Board Community" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



 -- 
 Christian Hammond
 President/CEO of Beanbag 
 Makers of Review Board 

>>> -- 
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Review Board Community" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag 
> Makers of Review Board 
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For

Re: Review Board GitLab integration not working (missing Repository Plan)

2018-04-17 Thread Christian Hammond 
Hi Selim,

With GitLab, you don't need any kind of file access to the repository, and
don't need cgit/GitWeb. Those are only required for standalone Git
repositories. Glad it's working :)

Avatar images should upload fine so long as directory permissions are
correct throughout $sitedir/htdocs/media/uploaded/. What are you seeing?

Christian

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:01 AM, 'Selim Tuvi' via Review Board Community <
reviewboard@googlegroups.com> wrote:

> Hi Christian, we just tried 3.0.6 and it works out of the box with our
> GitLab server without having to use cgit/GitWeb and we don't have the
> repositories directly accessible via file paths. So somehow the API access
> works fine!
>
> Also, do you know why we can not upload any avatar images? Is that a known
> issue?
>
> Thanks
> -Selim
>
>
> On Monday, April 16, 2018 at 1:43:54 PM UTC-7, Selim Tuvi wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Christian, we'll give 3.0.5 a try.
>>
>> -Selim
>>
>> On Friday, March 23, 2018 at 12:49:40 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We had a regression that came up very late in the release and broke part
>>> of the repository form. We just put out 3.0.5 (announcements coming in the
>>> morning) that address this. Try upgrading and see if it works any better
>>> for you.
>>>
>>> For self-hosted Git repositories not directly accessible via file paths
>>> by the Review Board server, you do need cgit/GitWeb. The reason is that
>>> Git's network protocol is *very* limited, and doesn't allow the same kind
>>> of queries that most other types of source code management systems use. We
>>> have a new, open source product in the works designed to give self-hosted
>>> Git repositories a functional API and deeper integration hooks. We're
>>> working on some of the last bits needed before we can release that.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:16 AM, 'Selim Tuvi' via Review Board Community
>>>  wrote:
>>>
 Hi, we are in the process of evaluating Review Board 3.0.4 and wanted
 to try the GitLab integration.

 We have a self hosted GitLab CE installatin. When I try to add the
 repository, I don't get to pick any values from the "Repository Plan". See
 attached image.

 And if I try to save it, I get an error about the plan.

 Also, I read here
 
 that for self hosted Git repositories we need to use GitWeb or cgit. Is
 that still the case?

 Thanks
 -Selim

 --
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups "Review Board Community" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Hammond
>>> President/CEO of Beanbag 
>>> Makers of Review Board 
>>>
>> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Review Board Community" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Christian Hammond
President/CEO of Beanbag 
Makers of Review Board 

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Review Board GitLab integration not working (missing Repository Plan)

2018-04-17 Thread 'Selim Tuvi' via Review Board Community 
Hi Christian, we just tried 3.0.6 and it works out of the box with our 
GitLab server without having to use cgit/GitWeb and we don't have the 
repositories directly accessible via file paths. So somehow the API access 
works fine!

Also, do you know why we can not upload any avatar images? Is that a known 
issue?

Thanks
-Selim

On Monday, April 16, 2018 at 1:43:54 PM UTC-7, Selim Tuvi wrote:
>
> Thank you Christian, we'll give 3.0.5 a try.
>
> -Selim
>
> On Friday, March 23, 2018 at 12:49:40 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We had a regression that came up very late in the release and broke part 
>> of the repository form. We just put out 3.0.5 (announcements coming in the 
>> morning) that address this. Try upgrading and see if it works any better 
>> for you.
>>
>> For self-hosted Git repositories not directly accessible via file paths 
>> by the Review Board server, you do need cgit/GitWeb. The reason is that 
>> Git's network protocol is *very* limited, and doesn't allow the same kind 
>> of queries that most other types of source code management systems use. We 
>> have a new, open source product in the works designed to give self-hosted 
>> Git repositories a functional API and deeper integration hooks. We're 
>> working on some of the last bits needed before we can release that.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:16 AM, 'Selim Tuvi' via Review Board Community 
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, we are in the process of evaluating Review Board 3.0.4 and wanted to 
>>> try the GitLab integration.
>>>
>>> We have a self hosted GitLab CE installatin. When I try to add the 
>>> repository, I don't get to pick any values from the "Repository Plan". See 
>>> attached image.
>>>
>>> And if I try to save it, I get an error about the plan.
>>>
>>> Also, I read here 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> that for self hosted Git repositories we need to use GitWeb or cgit. Is 
>>> that still the case?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Selim
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>>> https://rbcommons.com/
>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Review Board Community" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Christian Hammond
>> President/CEO of Beanbag 
>> Makers of Review Board 
>>
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Review Board GitLab integration not working (missing Repository Plan)

2018-04-16 Thread 'Selim Tuvi' via Review Board Community 
Thank you Christian, we'll give 3.0.5 a try.

-Selim

On Friday, March 23, 2018 at 12:49:40 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We had a regression that came up very late in the release and broke part 
> of the repository form. We just put out 3.0.5 (announcements coming in the 
> morning) that address this. Try upgrading and see if it works any better 
> for you.
>
> For self-hosted Git repositories not directly accessible via file paths by 
> the Review Board server, you do need cgit/GitWeb. The reason is that Git's 
> network protocol is *very* limited, and doesn't allow the same kind of 
> queries that most other types of source code management systems use. We 
> have a new, open source product in the works designed to give self-hosted 
> Git repositories a functional API and deeper integration hooks. We're 
> working on some of the last bits needed before we can release that.
>
> Christian
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:16 AM, 'Selim Tuvi' via Review Board Community <
> revie...@googlegroups.com > wrote:
>
>> Hi, we are in the process of evaluating Review Board 3.0.4 and wanted to 
>> try the GitLab integration.
>>
>> We have a self hosted GitLab CE installatin. When I try to add the 
>> repository, I don't get to pick any values from the "Repository Plan". See 
>> attached image.
>>
>> And if I try to save it, I get an error about the plan.
>>
>> Also, I read here 
>> 
>>  
>> that for self hosted Git repositories we need to use GitWeb or cgit. Is 
>> that still the case?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Selim
>>
>> -- 
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Review Board Community" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag 
> Makers of Review Board 
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Review Board GitLab integration not working (missing Repository Plan)

2018-03-23 Thread Christian Hammond 
Hi,

We had a regression that came up very late in the release and broke part of
the repository form. We just put out 3.0.5 (announcements coming in the
morning) that address this. Try upgrading and see if it works any better
for you.

For self-hosted Git repositories not directly accessible via file paths by
the Review Board server, you do need cgit/GitWeb. The reason is that Git's
network protocol is *very* limited, and doesn't allow the same kind of
queries that most other types of source code management systems use. We
have a new, open source product in the works designed to give self-hosted
Git repositories a functional API and deeper integration hooks. We're
working on some of the last bits needed before we can release that.

Christian

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:16 AM, 'Selim Tuvi' via Review Board Community <
reviewboard@googlegroups.com> wrote:

> Hi, we are in the process of evaluating Review Board 3.0.4 and wanted to
> try the GitLab integration.
>
> We have a self hosted GitLab CE installatin. When I try to add the
> repository, I don't get to pick any values from the "Repository Plan". See
> attached image.
>
> And if I try to save it, I get an error about the plan.
>
> Also, I read here
> 
> that for self hosted Git repositories we need to use GitWeb or cgit. Is
> that still the case?
>
> Thanks
> -Selim
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Review Board Community" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Christian Hammond
President/CEO of Beanbag 
Makers of Review Board 

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.