Re: Manual server updates required after months of running fine?
Hi Christian, Thanks for the reply. Obviously, you're right, I looked at the database dump that I did before the rb-site upgrade and it did say 1.5.3, so I was not as careful as I thought I was when doing the migration months ago. Mea culpa. I finally twigged on the wording of the yellow box: ...and then restart your web server. Whatever was happening seemed to be cached state in certain httpd processes (thus the intermittent nature, it depended on what process served what request). I restarted Apache and all was well. Thanks for all your hard work on reviewboard. I installed it on a whim years ago and we have gradually built our whole workflow around it. Bill On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi Bill, That message should never really be seen outside of developer installs, but it does happen on occasion if something got messed up. The first thing to check is actually your database. Make sure it didn't crash at some point and have locked tables that need to be cleaned up. You should otherwise never see this page about the database schema. Now, at some point, you did have an install of 1.5.3 at least attempted. That number came directly from the database, put there after an rb-site upgrade when using 1.5.3. It's probably not related, but just something to point out. But yeah, check the database. I suspect that's where the problem is. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Bill Fenner fen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We've got a reviewboard installation, which we upgraded to 1.5.5 several months ago. That went swimmingly, and it's been working for months. Nothing has changed on the server, but now it is intermittently reporting Manual server updates required -- The Review Board database schema has changed since your last upgrade. Oddly, the Manual server updates required box suggests running ./manage.py syncdb, when I know that the upgrade command is actually rb-site upgrade. I ran rb-site upgrade, and got: Rebuilding directory structure Upgrading from version 1.5.3 Updating database. This may take a while. Upgrading Review Board from 1.5.3 to 1.5.5 No fixtures found. No evolution required. Upgrade complete. We never had 1.5.3 installed, we went from pre-1.0 svn snapshot straight to 1.5.5. After the rb-site upgrade, things went fine for a little while, and then I started getting the intermittent message. By intermittent, I mean that sometimes it appears as the only content on the page, and sometimes it appears between diff chunks, and sometimes it doesn't appear at all and reviewboard behaves as normal. I've looked in the Apache error_log, and all I see are the reviewboard debugging messages about diff generation. The log directory in my rb-site root is empty. Anyone have an idea of what else to try? Thanks, Bill -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
Hi Christian,
I think this page suggestions that should address my issues, correct?
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/69e334db357f183e/955e8ebd634d0a94?lnk=gstq=proxy+post-review#955e8ebd634d0a94
On Jun 10, 4:54 pm, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry Chrisitan, never mind, I misread your post. I'll do some more
digging for overriding the proxy configuration
On Jun 10, 4:51 pm,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, so would setting the environment variable in the command prompt
window do the trick?
On Jun 10, 4:32 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
We've seen people run into this sort of error with proxy servers.
Regardless
of your client-side proxy server configuration (say, in your Internet
settings, on Windows), it may still use the proxy server on post-review.
The error output looks very much like it came from a proxy server, meaning
that the request is going out to the proxy, and the proxy can't find the
domain. You'll need to blacklist it. I don't recall if it will at all
respect this black list with Python running on Windows. If it's Linux,
then
you want to be sure your http_proxy environment variable isn't set.
This has come up a couple of times, and it's clear we need a setting in
post-review itself to just override the proxy configuration.
If you search on this mailing list, you'll probably find a couple other
solutions.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:55 PM,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for not listing all the output, but company policy prohibits me
from doing that.
Yes, the error lists the hostname and FQDN
Also, we do give it the FQDN following the --server option
On Jun 10, 2:56 pm, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the error actually only list the hostname and not the fully
qualified name? If so, that may be part of your problem (throwing out
guesses). Have you tried using the fully qualified name?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tucker,
Thanks for the reply.
I ran nslookup server_name from both server_name (XP server)
and
from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine.
Both return
Name: server_name.domain
Address: ip_address
On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have a DNS problem:
Unable to determine IP address from host name for server_name.
What does nslookup server_name say?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a
requested URL could not be retrieved error
We're running:
ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP
Python 2.5.x
Apache 2.2.x
Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10
Here is the output after adding the --debug option:
--
post-review --server=server_name/rb_site --username= --
password= --revision-range=8325 --debug
RBTools 0.3.2
Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data
svn info
diff --version
repository info: Path: svn-server/ParentPath/RepoName,
Base
pa
th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False
HTTP GETting api/
Got HTTP error: 503: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML
4.01
Transition
al//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
HTMLHEADMETA HTTP-EQUIV=Content-Type CONTENT=text/html;
charset=iso-8859
-1
TITLEERROR: The requested URL could not be retrieved/TITLE
STYLE type=text/css!--BODY{background-color:#ff;font-
family:verdana,san
s-serif}PRE{font-family:sans-serif}--/STYLE
/HEADBODY
H2The requested URL could not be retrieved/H2
HR noshade size=1px
P
While trying to retrieve the URL:
A
HREF=server_name/rb_site/api/server_name/rb_site/api//
A
P
The following error was encountered:
BLOCKQUOTE
Unable to determine IP address from host name for
Iserver_name/I
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
The dnsserver returned:
BLOCKQUOTE
Name Error: The domain name does not exist.
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
This means that:
PRE
The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the
URL.
Check if the address is correct.
--
Thanks!
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate
Re: post-reviews: The requested URL could not be retrieved
It should, yes.
I think after some restructuring work is finished in post-review, we'll go
about making this a bit easier to deal with.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:48 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Christian,
I think this page suggestions that should address my issues, correct?
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/69e334db357f183e/955e8ebd634d0a94?lnk=gstq=proxy+post-review#955e8ebd634d0a94
On Jun 10, 4:54 pm, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry Chrisitan, never mind, I misread your post. I'll do some more
digging for overriding the proxy configuration
On Jun 10, 4:51 pm,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, so would setting the environment variable in the command prompt
window do the trick?
On Jun 10, 4:32 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
We've seen people run into this sort of error with proxy servers.
Regardless
of your client-side proxy server configuration (say, in your Internet
settings, on Windows), it may still use the proxy server on
post-review.
The error output looks very much like it came from a proxy server,
meaning
that the request is going out to the proxy, and the proxy can't find
the
domain. You'll need to blacklist it. I don't recall if it will at all
respect this black list with Python running on Windows. If it's
Linux, then
you want to be sure your http_proxy environment variable isn't set.
This has come up a couple of times, and it's clear we need a setting
in
post-review itself to just override the proxy configuration.
If you search on this mailing list, you'll probably find a couple
other
solutions.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:55 PM,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for not listing all the output, but company policy prohibits
me
from doing that.
Yes, the error lists the hostname and FQDN
Also, we do give it the FQDN following the --server option
On Jun 10, 2:56 pm, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the error actually only list the hostname and not the fully
qualified name? If so, that may be part of your problem
(throwing out
guesses). Have you tried using the fully qualified name?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Tucker,
Thanks for the reply.
I ran nslookup server_name from both server_name (XP
server) and
from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine.
Both return
Name: server_name.domain
Address: ip_address
On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have a DNS problem:
Unable to determine IP address from host name for
server_name.
What does nslookup server_name say?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM,ptrchenptrc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
We've been trying to run post-review but have been running
into a
requested URL could not be retrieved error
We're running:
ReviewBoard 1.5.5 on Windows XP
Python 2.5.x
Apache 2.2.x
Subversion 1.6.16, running on a sparc-solaris2.10
Here is the output after adding the --debug option:
--
post-review --server=server_name/rb_site --username=
--
password= --revision-range=8325 --debug
RBTools 0.3.2
Home = C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data
svn info
diff --version
repository info: Path:
svn-server/ParentPath/RepoName, Base
pa
th: /trunk, Supports changesets: False
HTTP GETting api/
Got HTTP error: 503: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD
HTML 4.01
Transition
al//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
HTMLHEADMETA HTTP-EQUIV=Content-Type
CONTENT=text/html;
charset=iso-8859
-1
TITLEERROR: The requested URL could not be
retrieved/TITLE
STYLE
type=text/css!--BODY{background-color:#ff;font-
family:verdana,san
s-serif}PRE{font-family:sans-serif}--/STYLE
/HEADBODY
H2The requested URL could not be retrieved/H2
HR noshade size=1px
P
While trying to retrieve the URL:
A
HREF=server_name/rb_site/api/server_name/rb_site/api//
A
P
The following error was encountered:
BLOCKQUOTE
Unable to determine IP address from host name for
Iserver_name/I
/BLOCKQUOTE
P
The dnsserver returned:
BLOCKQUOTE
Re: Issue 2113 in reviewboard: Installer contradicts itself and recommends an unsupported configuration
Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: chip...@gmail.com Comment #2 on issue 2113 by chip...@gmail.com: Installer contradicts itself and recommends an unsupported configuration http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2113 Fixed on master (36ad689) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1847 in reviewboard: The diff-comments resource is unaccessible in REST API 2.0
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 1847 by chip...@gmail.com: The diff-comments resource is unaccessible in REST API 2.0 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1847 Not sure where the original bug is, but this has since been fixed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2005 in reviewboard: IE support broken in 1.6beta1
Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: chip...@gmail.com Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Critical Milestone-Release1.6 Browser Comment #8 on issue 2005 by chip...@gmail.com: IE support broken in 1.6beta1 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2005 Fixed on master (35b3bf2). Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1611 in reviewboard: Unable to log in after visit and save admin/db/siteconfig/siteconfiguration/*/
Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: chip...@gmail.com Comment #2 on issue 1611 by chip...@gmail.com: Unable to log in after visit and save admin/db/siteconfig/siteconfiguration/*/ http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1611 Assuming this has since been dealt with. In 1.6, you can't edit the text on this page. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2135 in reviewboard: clearcase.py failing on CentOS 5 (Python 2.4)
Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: chip...@gmail.com Labels: Component-SCMTools Comment #1 on issue 2135 by chip...@gmail.com: clearcase.py failing on CentOS 5 (Python 2.4) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2135 Fixed on master (r6eb15d0). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2105 in reviewboard: Publishing comments ignores edits when unpublished edits exist
Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: Milestone-Release1.6.x Component-Reviews Comment #1 on issue 2105 by chip...@gmail.com: Publishing comments ignores edits when unpublished edits exist http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2105 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2002 in reviewboard: linkified URL has succeeding parenthesis included in link's target URL
Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Low Milestone-Release1.6 Component-Reviews Comment #2 on issue 2002 by chip...@gmail.com: linkified URL has succeeding parenthesis included in link's target URL http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2002 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2002 in reviewboard: linkified URL has succeeding parenthesis included in link's target URL
Updates: Labels: EasyFix Comment #3 on issue 2002 by chip...@gmail.com: linkified URL has succeeding parenthesis included in link's target URL http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2002 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 2140 in reviewboard: unable to install RBTools
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2140 by tarun.te...@gmail.com: unable to install RBTools http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2140 I extracted RBTools-0.3.2.tar.gz in C:\RBTools-0.3.2\ in Windows 7 Enterprise edition PC with Python 3.2. while running the command below: python setup.py I am getting the following error : Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 22, in module from ez_setup import use_setuptools File C:\RBTools-0.3.2\ez_setup.py, line 106 except pkg_resources.VersionConflict, e: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax Please resolve the issue. Regards, Tarun 2. 3. $ python setup.py What is the expected output? What do you see instead? What operating system are you using? What browser? Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2001 in reviewboard: wrong method name displayed in condensed diff view
Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: Component-DiffViewer Milestone-Release1.6.x Comment #2 on issue 2001 by chip...@gmail.com: wrong method name displayed in condensed diff view http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2001 Strange. I can't figure out why it would have done that. Think we'd need a public repro case here. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1637 in reviewboard: Review Board + perforce can not upload diff
Comment #10 on issue 1637 by vpeng...@gmail.com: Review Board + perforce can not upload diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1637 Comment 7 gives the right clue. Suggest improving the error output messages. Ask users to check the p4 path for the Python scripts! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2039 in reviewboard: My Dashboard datagrid table is not properly aligned in Chrome browser (dev channel)
Comment #2 on issue 2039 by chu.e...@gmail.com: My Dashboard datagrid table is not properly aligned in Chrome browser (dev channel) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2039 When you say newer builds I'm not sure if you're referring to Chrome builds or RB builds. The issue was reported against Chrome 11.0.696.14, and as of today (Chrome 14.0.794.0) it is still happening. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 2141 in reviewboard: Cannot generate docs from tarball release
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2141 by karrde...@gmail.com: Cannot generate docs from tarball release http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2141 What version are you running? ReviewBoard 1.5.5 and 1.6beta2.1 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? N/A What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. tar zvfz ReviewBoard-1.5.5.tar.gz 2. cd ReviewBoard-1.5.5.tar.gz 3. make -C docs/manual SPHINXOPTS=-N What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I would expect that it would generate the HTML documentation. Instead, I get an error message (see attached log) What operating system are you using? What browser? Fedora Linux 15 Please provide any additional information below. I am building this from source to include in the RPM in Fedora. Attachments: makedocs.log 10.9 KB -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2141 in reviewboard: Cannot generate docs from tarball release
Comment #1 on issue 2141 by karrde...@gmail.com: Cannot generate docs from tarball release http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2141 For the record, I can generate the docs from a git checkout, so I suspect the issue occurs during the release process. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
