Re: Issue 1536 in reviewboard: Enabling Active Directory causes complete lockout (even local superuser cannot log back in)

2010-06-27 Thread reviewboard


Comment #5 on issue 1536 by chipx86: Enabling Active Directory causes  
complete lockout (even local superuser cannot log back in)

http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1536

Can you try something on your end? You'd need to either modify your  
installed copy (when nobody's using it, if possible) or have a test dev  
environment to play with.


Edit reviewboard/accounts/backends.py. Find the 'authenticate' function  
in 'ActiveDirectoryBackend'.


Look for the line that says 'user_data = self.search_ad(..)'. Right  
after that, add:


if not user_data:
return None

Then restart your web server and try again.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.



Re: Issue 1518 in reviewboard: new json api - get list of review requests created between date range

2010-06-27 Thread reviewboard

Updates:
Status: PendingReview

Comment #2 on issue 1518 by chipx86: new json api - get list of review  
requests created between date range

http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1518

Up for review at http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1686/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.



Re: Issue 1536 in reviewboard: Enabling Active Directory causes complete lockout (even local superuser cannot log back in)

2010-06-27 Thread reviewboard


Comment #4 on issue 1536 by sierragolfoneniner: Enabling Active Directory  
causes complete lockout (even local superuser cannot log back in)

http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1536

I even tried several times to make up admin users with random strings as  
their names (e.g. "djfskhkfshfsd") so unless AD has some sort of wildcard  
capability or I was really (un)lucky there's no way the users could have  
existed.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.



Re: Issue 394 in reviewboard: if a diff includes a file that has been cvs remove'd, reviewboard won't accept it

2010-06-27 Thread reviewboard

Updates:
Status: PendingReview

Comment #18 on issue 394 by chipx86: if a diff includes a file that has  
been cvs remove'd, reviewboard won't accept it

http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=394

That wasn't too bad.. I have a patch up for review at  
http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1685/


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.



Re: Issue 1066 in reviewboard: Show file status in diff (added, modified, deleted, renamed)

2010-06-27 Thread reviewboard


Comment #7 on issue 1066 by chipx86: Show file status in diff (added,  
modified, deleted, renamed)

http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1066

The deleted part of this is up for review at  
http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1685/. This part should end up in 1.5. The  
rest will wait until 1.6 or later.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.



Re: Issue 1587 in reviewboard: Some lines don't word-wrap correctly on IE/Chrome

2010-06-27 Thread reviewboard

Updates:
Status: ThirdParty

Comment #10 on issue 1587 by chipx86: Some lines don't word-wrap correctly  
on IE/Chrome

http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1587

Closing as third-party, since there's nothing sane we can do about this. It  
depends on the browser and on the characters used on the lines.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.



Re: Issue 394 in reviewboard: if a diff includes a file that has been cvs remove'd, reviewboard won't accept it

2010-06-27 Thread reviewboard

Updates:
Owner: chipx86
Labels: -Component-SCMTools Component-DiffViewer Component-DiffParser

Comment #17 on issue 394 by chipx86: if a diff includes a file that has  
been cvs remove'd, reviewboard won't accept it

http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=394

Been poking at this. Since the problem is that the RCS File line doesn't  
contain any information on which module the file is in, we may have to  
post-process the diff in post-review. Another option is to finally give  
Review Board a concept of "deleted files", but that's potentially a larger  
change.


This appears to be a conscious choice on behalf of cvs:

/* This is fullname, not file, possibly despite the POSIX.2
 * specification, because that's the way all the Larry Wall
 * implementations of patch (are there other implementations?) want
 * things and the POSIX.2 spec appears to leave room for this.
 */

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.



Re: Issue 394 in reviewboard: if a diff includes a file that has been cvs remove'd, reviewboard won't accept it

2010-06-27 Thread reviewboard


Comment #16 on issue 394 by chipx86: if a diff includes a file that has  
been cvs remove'd, reviewboard won't accept it

http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=394

Actually, that won't be good enough. We really do need the full file path.  
cvs really should be showing the full path information. The fact that it's  
not is bad, and we need to investigate how long this has been happening and  
figure out if there's a fix for it.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.



Re: Issue 676 in reviewboard: Document how to raise the mysql packet size

2010-06-27 Thread reviewboard

Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-Release1.5 Milestone-Release1.5.x

Comment #10 on issue 676 by chipx86: Document how to raise the mysql packet  
size

http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=676

(No comment was entered for this change.)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.



Re: Issue 1571 in reviewboard: Diff-Upload UI: Base Path field too narrow

2010-06-27 Thread reviewboard

Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-Release1.5 Milestone-Release1.5.x

Comment #4 on issue 1571 by chipx86: Diff-Upload UI:  Base Path field too  
narrow

http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1571

(No comment was entered for this change.)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.



Re: Issue 1683 in reviewboard: PendingDeprecationWarning while rbsite install

2010-06-27 Thread reviewboard

Updates:
Status: Fixed
Owner: chipx86

Comment #3 on issue 1683 by chipx86: PendingDeprecationWarning while rbsite  
install

http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1683

Changed rb-site to silence this warning.

Fixed on master (revision 3028465).

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.



Re: Issue 1683 in reviewboard: PendingDeprecationWarning while rbsite install

2010-06-27 Thread reviewboard


Comment #2 on issue 1683 by chipx86: PendingDeprecationWarning while rbsite  
install

http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1683

Well, looks like we can't do much about the warnings in this release. In  
order to really support 1.1 *and* 1.2, we need get_type and  
get_db_prep_save to take *args, **kwargs instead of just a connection, but  
that won't silence the warning due to how they check for it. So, for the  
time-being, we'll need to silence those warnings.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.