Issue 2578 in reviewboard: Wrong content type header value for multipart/form-data when using gadgets.io.proxiedMultipartFormPost
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2578 by bizh...@gmail.com: Wrong content type header value for multipart/form-data when using gadgets.io.proxiedMultipartFormPost http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2578 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. * * If you need immediate support, please contact* * reviewbo...@googlegroups.com * What version are you running? 2.5.0 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? http://localhost:8080/fiesta/samplecontainer/samplecontainer.html What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Visit http://localhost:8080/fiesta/samplecontainer/samplecontainer.html 2. load Gadget samplecontainer/examples/ImageUploadGadget.xml for testing 3. Upload an image file What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Expected: request header content-type should with value like - multipart/form-data;boundary=-- However, the content-type head property is set to - multipart/form-data,multipart/form-data; boundary=X Duplicate multipart text in it. This will cause the upload fail. What operating system are you using? What browser? Window 7. IE/Firefox Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2578 in reviewboard: Wrong content type header value for multipart/form-data when using gadgets.io.proxiedMultipartFormPost
Comment #1 on issue 2578 by bizh...@gmail.com: Wrong content type header value for multipart/form-data when using gadgets.io.proxiedMultipartFormPost http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2578 I am working on this, if there is an Jira defect opened to this, please assign it to me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2578 in reviewboard: Wrong content type header value for multipart/form-data when using gadgets.io.proxiedMultipartFormPost
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #2 on issue 2578 by trowb...@gmail.com: Wrong content type header value for multipart/form-data when using gadgets.io.proxiedMultipartFormPost http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2578 I'm confused. This bug report doesn't seem to be about reviewboard? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 2579 in reviewboard: djblets: embedded jquery stuff doesn't incude source and copyright information
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 2579 by dmitry.n...@gmail.com: djblets: embedded jquery stuff doesn't incude source and copyright information http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2579 Hi, I'm trying to package reviewboard together with dependencies to debian and it was noticed by Jakub Wilk that there are a few issues with JQuery .js files distributed in djblets and reviewboard tarballs DJblets: 1. djblets/media/js/jquery-1.3.2.min.js is distributed as obfuscated file. Could you please put original source JS (human-readable) file somewhere in tarball? It's even not required to actually use it. This will simplify packaging work 2. For jquery-ui-1.6rc2.min.js and jquery-ui-1.6rc5.min.js are obfuscated too. JQuery UI is originally distributed under GPL/MIT and both license requirements are not satisfied (no copyright statement, etc). At the same time it looks like they are not used at all in djblets. So probably it's ok to just remove them for tarball 3. datagrid.js and jquery.gravy.js looks like not from JQuery. datagrid looks like reviewboard-specific and jquery.gravy is present in some other projects. Do you know license of these files? If they are from reviewboard, could you please specify their license at the top Reviewboard: 1. Exactly same as p.2 for djblets: /reviewboard/htdocs/media/rb/js/jquery-tui-1.6rc5.min.js lacks copyright statement so it violates both GPL and MIT. Could you please also include it's source in tarball? 2. ui.autocomplete.min.js contains original source (thanks for this). But unfortunately it lacks copyright header too. Thanks a lot -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 2580 in reviewboard: djblets: can't run tests from release tarball
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2580 by dmitry.n...@gmail.com: djblets: can't run tests from release tarball http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2580 Hi, It looks like it's impossible to pass all tests from release tarball of djblets. I've found that followed two files are missing in DJblets-0.6.17 tarball compared to corresponding git tag: djblets/feedview/testdata/sample.rss contrib/internal/release.py tests/pyflakes.exclude Are tests supposed to be executed from release tarball? Also even in git tag, one of test fails: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nose/loader.py, line 390, in loadTestsFromName addr.filename, addr.module) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nose/importer.py, line 39, in importFromPath return self.importFromDir(dir_path, fqname) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nose/importer.py, line 86, in importFromDir mod = load_module(part_fqname, fh, filename, desc) File /srv/dion/src/deb/djblets/test/test.git/djblets/pipeline/compilers/bless.py, line 6, in module from pipeline.compilers import CompilerBase, CompilerError ImportError: No module named pipeline.compilers Probably setup.py has no dependeny on django-pipeline or just test is outdated. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1459 in reviewboard: post-review produces error /reviewboard/api/json/accounts/login/ not found
Comment #3 on issue 1459 by kptz...@gmail.com: post-review produces error /reviewboard/api/json/accounts/login/ not found http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1459 I had the same issue. I installed rbtools with apt-get and the version was 0.21. The path was also correct (verified by third person). I solved it by uninstalling rbtools and installing it this way: sudo apt-get install python-setuptools sudo easy_install -U RBTools -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
