[GitHub] spark issue #17130: [SPARK-19791] [ML] Add doc and example for fpgrowth

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17130
  
**[Test build #74383 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74383/testReport)**
 for PR 17130 at commit 
[`9ce0093`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9ce00930ea18c7bb8fe0cc59b98f6ece34d20311).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17251: [SPARK-19910][SQL] `stack` should not reject NULL values...

2017-03-10 Thread dongjoon-hyun
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
  
I added `StackCoercision` at 
[here](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251/commits/36d90811a77889b19c47347fc591a8e1a6a482f3),
 but reverted that.

For `StackCoercision`, we need the schema which is based on the number of 
rows (and derived columns) from the first argument. Actually, the content of 
the first argument. The validation of the value is done by 
`Stack.checkInputDataTypes`. It seems we cannot add `StackCoercision`.

For example, `StackCoercision` will fail for the followings.
```
// The first argument must be a positive constant integer.
val m = intercept[AnalysisException] {
  df.selectExpr("stack(1.1, 1, 2, 3)")
}.getMessage
assert(m.contains("The number of rows must be a positive constant 
integer."))
val m2 = intercept[AnalysisException] {
  df.selectExpr("stack(-1, 1, 2, 3)")
}.getMessage
assert(m2.contains("The number of rows must be a positive constant 
integer."))
```


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17251: [SPARK-19910][SQL] `stack` should not reject NULL values...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
  
**[Test build #74382 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74382/testReport)**
 for PR 17251 at commit 
[`0cd5d88`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0cd5d88609a2e36459498a86caec5046d9ebe2b1).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17255: [SPARK-19918[SQL] Use TextFileFormat in implementation o...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17255
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17255: [SPARK-19918[SQL] Use TextFileFormat in implementation o...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17255
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74375/
Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17255: [SPARK-19918[SQL] Use TextFileFormat in implementation o...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17255
  
**[Test build #74375 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74375/testReport)**
 for PR 17255 at commit 
[`e2d34b8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e2d34b8ac0f7a7ebf4c8c120a639de9451b20f6e).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17251: [SPARK-19910][SQL] `stack` should not reject NULL values...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
  
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17251: [SPARK-19910][SQL] `stack` should not reject NULL values...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
  
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74376/
Test FAILed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17251: [SPARK-19910][SQL] `stack` should not reject NULL values...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
  
**[Test build #74376 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74376/testReport)**
 for PR 17251 at commit 
[`36d9081`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/36d90811a77889b19c47347fc591a8e1a6a482f3).
 * This patch **fails Spark unit tests**.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #17251: [SPARK-19910][SQL] `stack` should not reject NULL...

2017-03-10 Thread dongjoon-hyun
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251#discussion_r105528166
  
--- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
 ---
@@ -590,6 +591,22 @@ object TypeCoercion {
   }
 
   /**
+   * Coerces NullTypes of a Stack function to the corresponding column 
types.
+   */
+  object StackCoercion extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
+def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan resolveExpressions {
+  case s @ Stack(children) if s.childrenResolved =>
+val schema = s.elementSchema
--- End diff --

Oops. This breaks 
[GeneratorFunctionSuite](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/GeneratorFunctionSuite.scala#L30).

For `StackCoercision`, we need the schema which is based on the number of 
rows (and derived columns) from the **first argument**. Actually, the content 
of the first argument. The validate of the value is done by 
`Stack.checkInputDataTypes`. It seems we cannot add `StackCoercision` in this 
manner. How do you think about this?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #17209: [SPARK-19853][SS] uppercase kafka topics fail whe...

2017-03-10 Thread uncleGen
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209#discussion_r105528025
  
--- Diff: 
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceProvider.scala
 ---
@@ -450,10 +445,22 @@ private[kafka010] class KafkaSourceProvider extends 
DataSourceRegister
 
 private[kafka010] object KafkaSourceProvider {
   private val STRATEGY_OPTION_KEYS = Set("subscribe", "subscribepattern", 
"assign")
-  private val STARTING_OFFSETS_OPTION_KEY = "startingoffsets"
-  private val ENDING_OFFSETS_OPTION_KEY = "endingoffsets"
+  private[kafka010] val STARTING_OFFSETS_OPTION_KEY = "startingoffsets"
+  private[kafka010] val ENDING_OFFSETS_OPTION_KEY = "endingoffsets"
   private val FAIL_ON_DATA_LOSS_OPTION_KEY = "failondataloss"
--- End diff --

change for unit test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17087: [SPARK-19372][SQL] Fix throwing a Java exception at df.f...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #17243: [SPARK-19901][Core]Clean up the clunky method sig...

2017-03-10 Thread ConeyLiu
Github user ConeyLiu closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17243


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17087: [SPARK-19372][SQL] Fix throwing a Java exception at df.f...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74374/
Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17243: [SPARK-19901][Core]Clean up the clunky method signature ...

2017-03-10 Thread ConeyLiu
Github user ConeyLiu commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17243
  
ok, I will close it.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17087: [SPARK-19372][SQL] Fix throwing a Java exception at df.f...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
  
**[Test build #74374 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74374/testReport)**
 for PR 17087 at commit 
[`c5fc5f1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c5fc5f140a9c5d661748033f4bad0f59e1ca88bb).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds the following public classes _(experimental)_:
  * `class InterpretedPredicate(expression: Expression) extends 
GenPredicate `


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17250: [SPARK-19911][STREAMING] Add builder interface for Kines...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17250
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74379/
Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17250: [SPARK-19911][STREAMING] Add builder interface for Kines...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17250
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17250: [SPARK-19911][STREAMING] Add builder interface for Kines...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17250
  
**[Test build #74379 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74379/testReport)**
 for PR 17250 at commit 
[`a604dc5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a604dc5952a1c9939d433371abc969670a8ff6ab).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds the following public classes _(experimental)_:
  * `  class Builder[T: ClassTag](`


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17209: [SPARK-19853][SS] uppercase kafka topics fail when start...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17209: [SPARK-19853][SS] uppercase kafka topics fail when start...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74380/
Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17209: [SPARK-19853][SS] uppercase kafka topics fail when start...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209
  
**[Test build #74380 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74380/testReport)**
 for PR 17209 at commit 
[`50ef0e1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/50ef0e11b85fee7947d840ccafc59bd23b17c189).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17256: [SPARK-19919][SQL] Defer throwing the exception for empt...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17256
  
**[Test build #74381 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74381/testReport)**
 for PR 17256 at commit 
[`9d91da1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9d91da124e0723adee7744a64999ea1c07acfe66).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #17256: [SPARK-19919][SQL] Defer throwing the exception f...

2017-03-10 Thread HyukjinKwon
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17256

[SPARK-19919][SQL] Defer throwing the exception for empty paths in CSV 
datasource into `DataSource`

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to defer throwing the exception within `DataSource`.

Currently, if other datasources fail to infer the schema, it returns `None` 
and then this is being validated in `DataSource` as below:

```
scala> spark.read.json("emptydir")
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Unable to infer schema for JSON. It 
must be specified manually.;
```

```
scala> spark.read.orc("emptydir")
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Unable to infer schema for ORC. It 
must be specified manually.;
```

```
scala> spark.read.parquet("emptydir")
org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Unable to infer schema for Parquet. 
It must be specified manually.;
```

However, CSV it checks it within the datasource implementation and throws 
another exception message as below:

```
scala> spark.read.csv("emptydir")
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: requirement failed: Cannot infer schema 
from an empty set of files
```

We could remove this duplicated check and validate this in one place in the 
same way with the same message.

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test in `CSVSuite` and manual test.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/HyukjinKwon/spark SPARK-19919

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17256.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #17256


commit 9d91da124e0723adee7744a64999ea1c07acfe66
Author: hyukjinkwon 
Date:   2017-03-11T06:53:39Z

Defer input path validation into DataSource in CSV datasource




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17209: [SPARK-19853][SS] uppercase kafka topics fail when start...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17209
  
**[Test build #74380 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74380/testReport)**
 for PR 17209 at commit 
[`50ef0e1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/50ef0e11b85fee7947d840ccafc59bd23b17c189).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17188: [SPARK-19751][SQL] Throw an exception if bean class has ...

2017-03-10 Thread maropu
Github user maropu commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
  
@cloud-fan Could you check again? Thanks!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17250: [SPARK-19911][STREAMING] Add builder interface for Kines...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17250
  
**[Test build #74379 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74379/testReport)**
 for PR 17250 at commit 
[`a604dc5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a604dc5952a1c9939d433371abc969670a8ff6ab).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #16290: [SPARK-18817] [SPARKR] [SQL] Set default warehous...

2017-03-10 Thread shivaram
Github user shivaram closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16290


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17254: [SPARK-19917][SQL]qualified partition path stored in cat...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254
  
**[Test build #74378 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74378/testReport)**
 for PR 17254 at commit 
[`36a3463`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/36a34632dbb000799c35727c00d1542d4bb1ce00).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15435: [SPARK-17139][ML] Add model summary for MultinomialLogis...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15435: [SPARK-17139][ML] Add model summary for MultinomialLogis...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74372/
Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15435: [SPARK-17139][ML] Add model summary for MultinomialLogis...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
  
**[Test build #74372 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74372/testReport)**
 for PR 15435 at commit 
[`e629030`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e629030c14d83dd330f3ff5cfb79ee3e95f35081).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17254: [SPARK-19917][SQL]qualified partition path stored in cat...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254
  
**[Test build #74377 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74377/testReport)**
 for PR 17254 at commit 
[`191d8a1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/191d8a1c434d3eb39d40821d3ee6ad304b052f63).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17255: [SPARK-19918[SQL] Use TextFileFormat in implementation o...

2017-03-10 Thread HyukjinKwon
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17255
  
(let me wait for the tests before cc'ing someone)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17254: [SPARK-19917][SQL]qualified partition path stored in cat...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254
  
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74373/
Test FAILed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17254: [SPARK-19917][SQL]qualified partition path stored in cat...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254
  
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17254: [SPARK-19917][SQL]qualified partition path stored in cat...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254
  
**[Test build #74373 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74373/testReport)**
 for PR 17254 at commit 
[`c0dc3b7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c0dc3b72149d2b88384e6ce5208e355d8bd7f52a).
 * This patch **fails Spark unit tests**.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17251: [SPARK-19910][SQL] `stack` should not reject NULL values...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
  
**[Test build #74376 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74376/testReport)**
 for PR 17251 at commit 
[`36d9081`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/36d90811a77889b19c47347fc591a8e1a6a482f3).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17188: [SPARK-19751][SQL] Throw an exception if bean class has ...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74371/
Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17188: [SPARK-19751][SQL] Throw an exception if bean class has ...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17188: [SPARK-19751][SQL] Throw an exception if bean class has ...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
  
**[Test build #74371 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74371/testReport)**
 for PR 17188 at commit 
[`75e1884`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/75e188495a9c9a55a46dfaaf7cecf41f8b60c130).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17188: [SPARK-19751][SQL] Throw an exception if bean class has ...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17188: [SPARK-19751][SQL] Throw an exception if bean class has ...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74370/
Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17188: [SPARK-19751][SQL] Throw an exception if bean class has ...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
  
**[Test build #74370 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74370/testReport)**
 for PR 17188 at commit 
[`2013679`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2013679ea4f726b2a5b86387753b98da5171113d).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17240: [SPARK-19915][SQL] Improve join reorder: simplify cost e...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17240
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17240: [SPARK-19915][SQL] Improve join reorder: simplify cost e...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17240
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74368/
Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17240: [SPARK-19915][SQL] Improve join reorder: simplify cost e...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17240
  
**[Test build #74368 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74368/testReport)**
 for PR 17240 at commit 
[`82a1740`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/82a17405a9abc0e5690e46855011e3755c2d8f90).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17255: [SPARK-19918[SQL] Use TextFileFormat in implementation o...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17255
  
**[Test build #74375 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74375/testReport)**
 for PR 17255 at commit 
[`e2d34b8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e2d34b8ac0f7a7ebf4c8c120a639de9451b20f6e).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #17255: [SPARK-19918[SQL] Use TextFileFormat in implement...

2017-03-10 Thread HyukjinKwon
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17255

[SPARK-19918[SQL] Use TextFileFormat in implementation of JsonFileFormat

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR proposes to use text datasource when Json schema inference.

This basically proposes the similar approach in 
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15813 If we use Dataset for initial 
loading when inferring the schema, there are advantages. Please refer 
SPARK-18362

It seems JSON one was supposed to be fixed together but taken out according 
to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15813

> A similar problem also affects the JSON file format and this patch 
originally fixed that as well, but I've decided to split that change into a 
separate patch so as not to conflict with changes in another JSON PR.

Also, this affects some functionalities because it does not use 
FileScanRDD. This problem is described in SPARK-19885 (but it was CSV's case).

## How was this patch tested?

Existing tests should cover this.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/HyukjinKwon/spark json-filescanrdd

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17255.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #17255


commit 5e90d04eb9b1dc011188def339f92f3e8ef7e236
Author: hyukjinkwon 
Date:   2017-03-11T05:42:43Z

Use TextFileFormat in implementation of JsonFileFormat




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17188: [SPARK-19751][SQL] Throw an exception if bean class has ...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17188: [SPARK-19751][SQL] Throw an exception if bean class has ...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74369/
Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17188: [SPARK-19751][SQL] Throw an exception if bean class has ...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
  
**[Test build #74369 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74369/testReport)**
 for PR 17188 at commit 
[`1f31c27`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1f31c2756a7f56e8e2f22a1e4054ea9e8e3d165c).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17253: [SPARK-19916][SQL] simplify bad file handling

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17253
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17253: [SPARK-19916][SQL] simplify bad file handling

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17253
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74367/
Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17253: [SPARK-19916][SQL] simplify bad file handling

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17253
  
**[Test build #74367 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74367/testReport)**
 for PR 17253 at commit 
[`05febbd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/05febbdc58f566426796dbf814000381b309062f).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17251: [SPARK-19910][SQL] `stack` should not reject NULL values...

2017-03-10 Thread dongjoon-hyun
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
  
Basically, we can do that by bringing the logic from 
`Stack.checkInputDataTypes`.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17251: [SPARK-19910][SQL] `stack` should not reject NULL values...

2017-03-10 Thread dongjoon-hyun
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
  
@cloud-fan . 

For the following case, the values of `stack` consists of multiple columns.
Then, by adding *StackCoercion* rule, we need to *insert Cast() for all 
NullType*?

```scala
scala> sql("select stack(4, null, 1.0, 'a', true, 2, null, 'b', true, 3, 
3.0, null, false, 4, 4.0, 'd', null)").show
++++-+
|col0|col1|col2| col3|
++++-+
|null| 1.0|   a| true|
|   2|null|   b| true|
|   3| 3.0|null|false|
|   4| 4.0|   d| null|
++++-+
```


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15363: [SPARK-17791][SQL] Join reordering using star schema det...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15363: [SPARK-17791][SQL] Join reordering using star schema det...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74364/
Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15363: [SPARK-17791][SQL] Join reordering using star schema det...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363
  
**[Test build #74364 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74364/testReport)**
 for PR 15363 at commit 
[`fe0d390`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/fe0d390ba97d600bcc40445d0aade81ee5718f2b).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds the following public classes _(experimental)_:
  * `case class StarSchemaDetection(conf: CatalystConf) extends 
PredicateHelper `


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17243: [SPARK-19901][Core]Clean up the clunky method signature ...

2017-03-10 Thread srowen
Github user srowen commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17243
  
I'm not sure what this refers to. Unless it's giving a clear and 
non-trivial improvement to the method signatures, I don't think is worth the 
time to discuss and review. This particular change does not seem worthwhile.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #16788: [SPARK-16742] Kerberos impersonation support

2017-03-10 Thread mridulm
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16788
  
@tgravescs , @vanzin - this PR for mesos changes how spark handles kerberos 
tokens fundamentally; would be good to have your views.

+CC @jerryshao to also look at the PR, since you have worked on yarn 
security changes


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #16788: [SPARK-16742] Kerberos impersonation support

2017-03-10 Thread mridulm
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16788#discussion_r105319503
  
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala 
---
@@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ class DAGScheduler(
 val locs = taskIdToLocations(id)
 new ResultTask(stage.id, stage.latestInfo.attemptId,
   taskBinary, part, locs, id, properties, 
serializedTaskMetrics,
-  Option(jobId), Option(sc.applicationId), 
sc.applicationAttemptId)
+  Option(jobId), Option(sc.applicationId), 
sc.applicationAttemptId, Option(tokens))
   }
--- End diff --

Current spark model in yarn for managing tokens is to do it out of band 
with the actual tasks (unlike tez/MR iirc : where then the execution model is 
itself different).
The tasks themselves do not propagate the credentials - the executors 
directly update the credentials based on driver updates.

This allows for very long running spark tasks (> 24 hours for example) to 
run - which per task tokens might not allow.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #16788: [SPARK-16742] Kerberos impersonation support

2017-03-10 Thread mridulm
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16788#discussion_r105526180
  
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala 
---
@@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@ class DAGScheduler(
 runningStages -= stage
 return
 }
-
+val tokens = KerberosUtil.getHadoopDelegationTokens
--- End diff --


See my comment about below about how current spark (on yarn) handles 
security https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16788/files#r105319503.

@tgravescs or @vanzin can correct me if I am wrong (in case I am 
misremembering) - 
In a secure hdfs, it is not necessary for principal/keytab to be provided - 
if the job will finishes before token renewal is necessitated.

Given above : The call chain in KerberosUtil.getHadoopDelegationTokens will 
throw an exception if they are missing if ugi security is enabled.
I am not sure if this is a requirement in mesos, but it is not for yarn.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #16788: [SPARK-16742] Kerberos impersonation support

2017-03-10 Thread mridulm
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16788#discussion_r105526086
  
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/KerberosUser.scala 
---
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.spark.scheduler
+
+import org.apache.hadoop.security.{Credentials, UserGroupInformation}
+import org.apache.spark.{SparkConf, SparkEnv, SparkException}
+import org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkHadoopUtil
+import org.apache.spark.internal.Logging
+
+object KerberosUser extends Logging {
+
+  def securize (principal: String, keytab: String) : Unit = {
+val hadoopConf = SparkHadoopUtil.get.newConfiguration(new SparkConf())
+hadoopConf.set("hadoop.security.authentication", "Kerberos")
+UserGroupInformation.setConfiguration(hadoopConf)
+UserGroupInformation.loginUserFromKeytab(principal, keytab)
+  }
--- End diff --

This method is duplicated in KerberosUtil ?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #16788: [SPARK-16742] Kerberos impersonation support

2017-03-10 Thread mridulm
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16788#discussion_r105319198
  
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -151,9 +152,13 @@ object SparkSubmit extends CommandLineUtils {
 val (childArgs, childClasspath, sysProps, childMainClass) = 
prepareSubmitEnvironment(args)
 
 def doRunMain(): Unit = {
+  if (args.principal != null && args.keytab!= null) {
+KerberosUser.securize(args.principal, args.keytab)
--- End diff --

This will cause multiple UGI.loginUserFromKeytab (in yarn case it happens 
in SparkSubmit.prepareSubmitEnvironment) - which causes various issues.
In an application, there must be only one call to UGI.loginUserFromKeytab; 
if more than one, random things fail (dfs client, metastore, etc) due to the 
way the loginUser is cached/used and hadoop ipc renews unfortunately.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #16788: [SPARK-16742] Kerberos impersonation support

2017-03-10 Thread mridulm
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16788#discussion_r105526225
  
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ResultTask.scala 
---
@@ -60,9 +60,10 @@ private[spark] class ResultTask[T, U](
 serializedTaskMetrics: Array[Byte],
 jobId: Option[Int] = None,
 appId: Option[String] = None,
-appAttemptId: Option[String] = None)
+appAttemptId: Option[String] = None,
+tokens: Option[Array[Byte]] = None)
   extends Task[U](stageId, stageAttemptId, partition.index, 
localProperties, serializedTaskMetrics,
-jobId, appId, appAttemptId)
+jobId, appId, appAttemptId,tokens)
--- End diff --

Changes to both *Task.scala is changing the security model for not just 
mesos, but also yarn - and this is incompatible with existing public api 
(credential managers, etc)  : unless the PR is planning to overhaul the 
security in spark for all cluster managers.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #16788: [SPARK-16742] Kerberos impersonation support

2017-03-10 Thread mridulm
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16788#discussion_r105319759
  
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/KerberosUtil.scala 
---
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.spark.scheduler
+
+import java.security.PrivilegedExceptionAction
+
+import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration
+import org.apache.hadoop.fs.{FileSystem, Path}
+import org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Master
+import org.apache.hadoop.security.{Credentials, UserGroupInformation}
+import org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkHadoopUtil
+import org.apache.spark.{SparkConf, SparkEnv, SparkException}
+import org.apache.spark.internal.Logging
+
+object KerberosUtil  extends Logging {
+  var proxyUser : Option[UserGroupInformation] = None
+  def securize (principal: String, keytab: String) : Unit = {
+val hadoopConf = SparkHadoopUtil.get.newConfiguration(new SparkConf())
+hadoopConf.set("hadoop.security.authentication", "Kerberos")
+UserGroupInformation.setConfiguration(hadoopConf)
+UserGroupInformation.loginUserFromKeytab(principal, keytab)
+  }
+
+
+  def getHadoopDelegationTokens : Array[Byte] = {
--- End diff --

Given the frequency (and where it is invoked from) of this method - how 
expensive is it ?
+CC @tgravescs, @vanzin  


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #16788: [SPARK-16742] Kerberos impersonation support

2017-03-10 Thread mridulm
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16788#discussion_r105318927
  
--- Diff: 
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmitArguments.scala ---
@@ -257,10 +257,6 @@ private[deploy] class SparkSubmitArguments(args: 
Seq[String], env: Map[String, S
   "either HADOOP_CONF_DIR or YARN_CONF_DIR must be set in the 
environment.")
   }
 }
-
-if (proxyUser != null && principal != null) {
-  SparkSubmit.printErrorAndExit("Only one of --proxy-user or 
--principal can be provided.")
-}
--- End diff --

This validation is relevant for spark yarn support, and should not be 
removed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17087: [SPARK-19372][SQL] Fix throwing a Java exception at df.f...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17087
  
**[Test build #74374 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74374/testReport)**
 for PR 17087 at commit 
[`c5fc5f1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c5fc5f140a9c5d661748033f4bad0f59e1ca88bb).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #17055: [SPARK-19723][SQL]create datasource table with an...

2017-03-10 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17251: [SPARK-19910][SQL] `stack` should not reject NULL values...

2017-03-10 Thread cloud-fan
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17251
  
just add a new rule like `object IfCoercion extends Rule[LogicalPlan]`, to 
handle `Stack` with null literal


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17055: [SPARK-19723][SQL]create datasource table with an non-ex...

2017-03-10 Thread cloud-fan
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
  
thanks, merging to master!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #17253: [SPARK-19916][SQL] simplify bad file handling

2017-03-10 Thread cloud-fan
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17253#discussion_r105526137
  
--- Diff: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileScanRDD.scala
 ---
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ case class PartitionedFile(
 filePath: String,
 start: Long,
 length: Long,
-locations: Array[String] = Array.empty) {
+@transient locations: Array[String] = Array.empty) {
--- End diff --

this is not for `FileScanRDD.filePartitions`, this is for `FilePartition`s 
that sent by scheduler. The location is only useful during planning, we should 
not send it to executors.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #17055: [SPARK-19723][SQL]create datasource table with an...

2017-03-10 Thread windpiger
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055#discussion_r105526116
  
--- Diff: 
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala 
---
@@ -2016,48 +2016,79 @@ abstract class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with 
SQLTestUtils {
 }
   }
 
+  test("create datasource table with a non-existing location") {
+withTable("t", "t1") {
+  withTempPath { dir =>
+spark.sql(s"CREATE TABLE t(a int, b int) USING parquet LOCATION 
'$dir'")
+
+val table = 
spark.sessionState.catalog.getTableMetadata(TableIdentifier("t"))
+assert(table.location == makeQualifiedPath(dir.getAbsolutePath))
+
+spark.sql("INSERT INTO TABLE t SELECT 1, 2")
+assert(dir.exists())
+
+checkAnswer(spark.table("t"), Row(1, 2))
+  }
+  // partition table
+  withTempPath { dir =>
+spark.sql(
+  s"""
+ |CREATE TABLE t1(a int, b int) USING parquet PARTITIONED 
BY(a) LOCATION '$dir'
+   """.stripMargin)
+
+val table = 
spark.sessionState.catalog.getTableMetadata(TableIdentifier("t1"))
+assert(table.location == makeQualifiedPath(dir.getAbsolutePath))
+
+spark.sql("INSERT INTO TABLE t1 PARTITION(a=1) SELECT 2")
+
+val partDir = new File(dir, "a=1")
+assert(partDir.exists())
+
+checkAnswer(spark.table("t1"), Row(2, 1))
+  }
+}
+  }
+
   Seq(true, false).foreach { shouldDelete =>
-val tcName = if (shouldDelete) "non-existent" else "existed"
+val tcName = if (shouldDelete) "non-existing" else "existed"
 test(s"CTAS for external data source table with a $tcName location") {
   withTable("t", "t1") {
-withTempDir {
-  dir =>
-if (shouldDelete) {
-  dir.delete()
-}
-spark.sql(
-  s"""
- |CREATE TABLE t
- |USING parquet
- |LOCATION '$dir'
- |AS SELECT 3 as a, 4 as b, 1 as c, 2 as d
-   """.stripMargin)
-val table = 
spark.sessionState.catalog.getTableMetadata(TableIdentifier("t"))
-assert(table.location == 
makeQualifiedPath(dir.getAbsolutePath))
+withTempDir { dir =>
+  if (shouldDelete) {
+dir.delete()
+  }
--- End diff --

ok thanks~~


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #17253: [SPARK-19916][SQL] simplify bad file handling

2017-03-10 Thread cloud-fan
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17253#discussion_r105526080
  
--- Diff: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileScanRDD.scala
 ---
@@ -130,54 +144,35 @@ class FileScanRDD(
   // Sets InputFileBlockHolder for the file block's information
   InputFileBlockHolder.set(currentFile.filePath, 
currentFile.start, currentFile.length)
 
-  try {
-if (ignoreCorruptFiles) {
-  currentIterator = new NextIterator[Object] {
-private val internalIter = {
-  try {
-// The readFunction may read files before consuming 
the iterator.
-// E.g., vectorized Parquet reader.
-readFunction(currentFile)
-  } catch {
-case e @(_: RuntimeException | _: IOException) =>
-  logWarning(s"Skipped the rest content in the 
corrupted file: $currentFile", e)
-  Iterator.empty
-  }
-}
-
-override def getNext(): AnyRef = {
-  try {
-if (internalIter.hasNext) {
-  internalIter.next()
-} else {
-  finished = true
-  null
-}
-  } catch {
-case e: IOException =>
-  logWarning(s"Skipped the rest content in the 
corrupted file: $currentFile", e)
-  finished = true
-  null
+  if (ignoreCorruptFiles) {
+currentIterator = new NextIterator[Object] {
+  // The readFunction may read some bytes before consuming the 
iterator, e.g.,
+  // vectorized Parquet reader. Here we use lazy val to delay 
the creation of
+  // iterator so that we will throw exception in `getNext`.
+  private lazy val internalIter = readCurrentFile()
+
+  override def getNext(): AnyRef = {
+try {
+  if (internalIter.hasNext) {
+internalIter.next()
+  } else {
+finished = true
+null
   }
+} catch {
+  // Throw FileNotFoundException even `ignoreCorruptFiles` 
is true
+  case e: java.io.FileNotFoundException => throw e
--- End diff --

`FileNotFoundException` extends `IOException`


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #17254: [SPARK-19917][SQL]qualified partition path stored...

2017-03-10 Thread windpiger
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254#discussion_r105526016
  
--- Diff: 
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala 
---
@@ -2180,6 +2181,13 @@ abstract class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with 
SQLTestUtils {
 
   withTempDir { dir =>
 assert(!dir.getAbsolutePath.startsWith("file:/"))
+spark.sql(s"ALTER TABLE t SET LOCATION '$dir'")
--- End diff --

ALTER TABLE SET LOCATION
should be also qualified


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #17254: [SPARK-19917][SQL]qualified partition path stored...

2017-03-10 Thread windpiger
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254#discussion_r105526010
  
--- Diff: 
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala 
---
@@ -1357,13 +1360,11 @@ abstract class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with 
SQLTestUtils {
   "PARTITION (a='2', b='6') LOCATION 'paris' PARTITION (a='3', b='7')")
 assert(catalog.listPartitions(tableIdent).map(_.spec).toSet == 
Set(part1, part2, part3))
 assert(catalog.getPartition(tableIdent, 
part1).storage.locationUri.isDefined)
-val partitionLocation = if (isUsingHiveMetastore) {
-  val tableLocation = 
catalog.getTableMetadata(tableIdent).storage.locationUri
-  assert(tableLocation.isDefined)
-  makeQualifiedPath(new Path(tableLocation.get.toString, 
"paris").toString)
-} else {
-  new URI("paris")
--- End diff --

ALTER TABLE ADD PARTITION LOCATION
relative location will be quallified with parent path using table location



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #17254: [SPARK-19917][SQL]qualified partition path stored...

2017-03-10 Thread windpiger
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254#discussion_r105526000
  
--- Diff: 
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala 
---
@@ -1201,7 +1202,9 @@ abstract class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with 
SQLTestUtils {
 verifyLocation(new URI("/swanky/steak/place"))
 // set table partition location without explicitly specifying database
 sql("ALTER TABLE tab1 PARTITION (a='1', b='2') SET LOCATION 'vienna'")
-verifyLocation(new URI("vienna"), Some(partSpec))
+val table = 
spark.sessionState.catalog.getTableMetadata(TableIdentifier("tab1"))
--- End diff --

relative location will be quallified with parent path using table location


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17254: [SPARK-19917][SQL]qualified partition path stored in cat...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254
  
**[Test build #74373 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74373/testReport)**
 for PR 17254 at commit 
[`c0dc3b7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c0dc3b72149d2b88384e6ce5208e355d8bd7f52a).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #13837: [SPARK-16126] [SQL] Better Error Message When using Data...

2017-03-10 Thread felixcheung
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13837
  
hi - where are we on this one?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #17254: [SPARK-19917][SQL]qualified partition path stored...

2017-03-10 Thread windpiger
GitHub user windpiger opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254

[SPARK-19917][SQL]qualified partition path stored in catalog

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

partition path should be qualified to store in catalog. 
There are some scenes:
1. ALTER TABLE t PARTITION(b=1) SET LOCATION '/path/x' 
   qualified: file:/path/x
2. ALTER TABLE t PARTITION(b=1) SET LOCATION 'x' 
 qualified: file:/tablelocation/x
3. ALTER TABLE t ADD PARTITION(b=1) LOCATION '/path/x'
   qualified: file:/path/x
4. ALTER TABLE t ADD PARTITION(b=1) LOCATION 'x'
 qualified: file:/tablelocation/x

Currently only  ALTER TABLE t ADD PARTITION(b=1) LOCATION for hive serde 
table has the expected qualified path. we should make other scenes to be 
consist with it.

Another change is for alter table location.

## How was this patch tested?
modify existing TestCases


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/windpiger/spark qualifiedPartitionPath

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17254.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #17254


commit 51dcf4092345e173a63e088e779fa44c4fc963b1
Author: windpiger 
Date:   2017-03-11T04:39:02Z

[SPARK-19917][SQL]qualified partition path stored in catalog

commit 996a84d8d1ece4d311240e71a1a9be47828621f8
Author: windpiger 
Date:   2017-03-11T04:42:32Z

remove empty line




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17219: [SPARK-19876][SS][WIP] OneTime Trigger Executor

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
  
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17219: [SPARK-19876][SS][WIP] OneTime Trigger Executor

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
  
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74365/
Test FAILed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17219: [SPARK-19876][SS][WIP] OneTime Trigger Executor

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17219
  
**[Test build #74365 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74365/testReport)**
 for PR 17219 at commit 
[`8c5b84f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8c5b84f8875f630dc197c018d1d68f440164805b).
 * This patch **fails Spark unit tests**.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #16290: [SPARK-18817] [SPARKR] [SQL] Set default warehouse dir t...

2017-03-10 Thread felixcheung
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16290
  
Yes that's the plan.




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #17253: [SPARK-19916][SQL] simplify bad file handling

2017-03-10 Thread viirya
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17253#discussion_r105525303
  
--- Diff: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileScanRDD.scala
 ---
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ case class PartitionedFile(
 filePath: String,
 start: Long,
 length: Long,
-locations: Array[String] = Array.empty) {
+@transient locations: Array[String] = Array.empty) {
--- End diff --

do we need to mark it as `transient`? `filePartitions: Seq[FilePartition])` 
is already `transient` in `FileScanRDD`.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17253: [SPARK-19916][SQL] simplify bad file handling

2017-03-10 Thread viirya
Github user viirya commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17253
  
LGTM with very minor comment.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15435: [SPARK-17139][ML] Add model summary for MultinomialLogis...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15435
  
**[Test build #74372 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74372/testReport)**
 for PR 15435 at commit 
[`e629030`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e629030c14d83dd330f3ff5cfb79ee3e95f35081).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request #17253: [SPARK-19916][SQL] simplify bad file handling

2017-03-10 Thread viirya
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17253#discussion_r105525158
  
--- Diff: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileScanRDD.scala
 ---
@@ -130,54 +144,35 @@ class FileScanRDD(
   // Sets InputFileBlockHolder for the file block's information
   InputFileBlockHolder.set(currentFile.filePath, 
currentFile.start, currentFile.length)
 
-  try {
-if (ignoreCorruptFiles) {
-  currentIterator = new NextIterator[Object] {
-private val internalIter = {
-  try {
-// The readFunction may read files before consuming 
the iterator.
-// E.g., vectorized Parquet reader.
-readFunction(currentFile)
-  } catch {
-case e @(_: RuntimeException | _: IOException) =>
-  logWarning(s"Skipped the rest content in the 
corrupted file: $currentFile", e)
-  Iterator.empty
-  }
-}
-
-override def getNext(): AnyRef = {
-  try {
-if (internalIter.hasNext) {
-  internalIter.next()
-} else {
-  finished = true
-  null
-}
-  } catch {
-case e: IOException =>
-  logWarning(s"Skipped the rest content in the 
corrupted file: $currentFile", e)
-  finished = true
-  null
+  if (ignoreCorruptFiles) {
+currentIterator = new NextIterator[Object] {
+  // The readFunction may read some bytes before consuming the 
iterator, e.g.,
+  // vectorized Parquet reader. Here we use lazy val to delay 
the creation of
+  // iterator so that we will throw exception in `getNext`.
+  private lazy val internalIter = readCurrentFile()
+
+  override def getNext(): AnyRef = {
+try {
+  if (internalIter.hasNext) {
+internalIter.next()
+  } else {
+finished = true
+null
   }
+} catch {
+  // Throw FileNotFoundException even `ignoreCorruptFiles` 
is true
+  case e: java.io.FileNotFoundException => throw e
--- End diff --

nit: `FileNotFoundException` will be thrown anyway, do wee need this case?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17188: [SPARK-19751][SQL] Throw an exception if bean class has ...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
  
**[Test build #74371 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74371/testReport)**
 for PR 17188 at commit 
[`75e1884`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/75e188495a9c9a55a46dfaaf7cecf41f8b60c130).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #16867: [SPARK-16929] Improve performance when check speculatabl...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74359/
Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #16867: [SPARK-16929] Improve performance when check speculatabl...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #16867: [SPARK-16929] Improve performance when check speculatabl...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16867
  
**[Test build #74359 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74359/testReport)**
 for PR 16867 at commit 
[`09719a2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/09719a2b0e065f40d0dfe47c6b4342f0ad3a235c).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds the following public classes _(experimental)_:
  * `class MedianHeap(implicit val ord: Ordering[Double]) `


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17188: [SPARK-19751][SQL] Throw an exception if bean class has ...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
  
**[Test build #74370 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74370/testReport)**
 for PR 17188 at commit 
[`2013679`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2013679ea4f726b2a5b86387753b98da5171113d).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17055: [SPARK-19723][SQL]create datasource table with an non-ex...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74361/
Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17055: [SPARK-19723][SQL]create datasource table with an non-ex...

2017-03-10 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17055: [SPARK-19723][SQL]create datasource table with an non-ex...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17055
  
**[Test build #74361 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74361/testReport)**
 for PR 17055 at commit 
[`ada275c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ada275cde7d7ca189342446b4ddefcdd97c45d85).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17188: [SPARK-19751][SQL] Throw an exception if bean class has ...

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17188
  
**[Test build #74369 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74369/testReport)**
 for PR 17188 at commit 
[`1f31c27`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1f31c2756a7f56e8e2f22a1e4054ea9e8e3d165c).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #17253: [SPARK-19916][SQL] simplify bad file handling

2017-03-10 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17253
  
**[Test build #74367 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/74367/testReport)**
 for PR 17253 at commit 
[`05febbd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/05febbdc58f566426796dbf814000381b309062f).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



  1   2   3   4   5   6   >