[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-11-12 Thread MLnick
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
Thanks @dbtsai for your reply - yes that makes things clear. I didn't 
realise we can use a Breeze matrix in the optimizers. That will definitely 
help. I agree we should try to do that and simplify & clarify the code. 
Hopefully you or @sethah has time to do that for 2.1 but if not it'll be fine 
for 2.1.1


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-11-11 Thread sethah
Github user sethah commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
Thanks @dbtsai!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-11-11 Thread dbtsai
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
Thanks all for working on this PR. I merged this into master, and I'll 
create a followup task and PR to handle the abstraction together with handling 
the smoothing in the initialization of coefficients. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-11-11 Thread sethah
Github user sethah commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
Thanks for the detailed explanation @dbtsai. +1 for doing this in a 
separate PR, since I'd imagine we want to run all the performance tests again 
as well.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-11-11 Thread dbtsai
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
@MLnick I'm hoping that we could abstract out the the implementation of 
using column major format as much as possible; as a result, in the future, new 
developers can understand the code without thinking hard. I agree that we have 
good comments and documentation in the code now, but having said that, with 
some effort, we are able to hide the detail using column major matrix.

For example, let's say we have coeffs and gradient in column major 
matrices, we will be able to write L2 part of gradient in the following code 
without computing `isIntercept` and `featureIndex` using complicated logics.

```scala
  val coeffMatrix = new DenseMatrix(numClasses, numFeatures, Array(), 
false)
  val totalGradientMatrix = new DenseMatrix(numClasses, numFeatures, 
Array(), false)

  coeffMatrix.foreachActive { case (classIndex, featureIndex, value) =>
// We do not apply regularization to the intercepts
val isIntercept = fitIntercept && featureIndex == numFeatures
if (!isIntercept) {
  // The following code will compute the loss of the 
regularization; also
  // the gradient of the regularization, and add back to 
totalGradientArray.
  sum += {
if (standardization) {
  totalGradientMatrix.update(classIndex, featureIndex,
totalGradientMatrix(classIndex, featureIndex) + regParamL2 
* value)
  value * value
} else {
  if (featuresStd(featureIndex) != 0.0) {
// If `standardization` is false, we still standardize the 
data
// to improve the rate of convergence; as a result, we have 
to
// perform this reverse standardization by penalizing each 
component
// differently to get effectively the same objective 
function when
// the training dataset is not standardized.
val temp = value / (featuresStd(featureIndex) * 
featuresStd(featureIndex))
totalGradientMatrix.update(classIndex, featureIndex,
  totalGradientMatrix(classIndex, featureIndex) + 
regParamL2 * temp)
value * temp
  } else {
0.0
  }
}
  }
}
  }
  0.5 * regParamL2 * sum
}
```

For L1 part, I'm thinking to do the following, 
```scala
  new BreezeOWLQN[(Int, Int), BDM[Double]]($(maxIter), 10, 
regParamL1Fun, $(tol))
```
then we can implement L1 function as 
```scala
  def regParamL1Fun = (classIndex: Int, featureIndex: Int) => {
// Remove the L1 penalization on the intercept
   val isIntercept = fitIntercept && featureIndex == numFeatures
if (isIntercept) {
  0.0
} else {
  if (standardizationParam) {
regParamL1
  } else {
if (featuresStd(featureIndex) != 0.0) {
  regParamL1 / featuresStd(featureIndex)
} else {
  0.0
}
  }
}
  }
```

By having coeffs and gradientSum in matrix, we also open up a opportunity 
to having both of them in sparse representation. With high dimensional 
problems, often times, both of them can be very sparse.

I'm also aware that we're cutting 2.1 release now, and this is an important 
performance improvement, so I'm open to deal with those cleaning up work in a 
separate PR so at least we're able to merge this.  

Thanks.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-11-11 Thread MLnick
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
@dbtsai I understand wanting to make things clear & easy to understand for 
current and future developers. Of course I would like the same.

However, it's currently not clear to me how (or if) your proposal above 
would work to achieve that goal. Concrete example code would help a lot here (I 
am probably missing something in my interpretation).

To be honest, even the current code is difficult to understand at first (or 
even third!) glance for a developer unfamiliar with the implementation (perhaps 
we can work to improve that, perhaps it can't be improved that much given we 
have to work with arrays, low-level performance and the Breeze optimizers). I 
don't think the col-major layout during training changes this situation 
significantly over row-major. As long as it is clearly and correctly documented 
I think it is ok (if the doc comments added here need improvement we can make 
changes). 

(By the way, the row- or col-major layout shouldn't make a difference for 
BLoR, and indeed the BLoR code is not really touched. The indexing may look 
different but is in practice the same).

I've worked through the impl in the PR and to me the changes look good. The 
tests are pretty comprehensive and are a good check on things so we can be 
comfortable. This is an important performance fix that I think must be in 2.1.

If you can show a way to achieve the same but have more clarity & 
simplicity, then I'm all for that, but I think that can be done in a separate 
JIRA (even after 2.1 if need be).

Let me know if you disagree.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-11-09 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-11-09 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68420/
Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-11-09 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
**[Test build #68420 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68420/consoleFull)**
 for PR 15593 at commit 
[`c003ee9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c003ee98ea50f0606046298ae412ca9f0a752566).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-11-09 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
**[Test build #68420 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68420/consoleFull)**
 for PR 15593 at commit 
[`c003ee9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c003ee98ea50f0606046298ae412ca9f0a752566).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-11-07 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-11-07 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68308/
Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-11-07 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
**[Test build #68308 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68308/consoleFull)**
 for PR 15593 at commit 
[`e205670`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e205670c163e7805f143097086d201661c7f104f).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-11-07 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
**[Test build #68308 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68308/consoleFull)**
 for PR 15593 at commit 
[`e205670`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e205670c163e7805f143097086d201661c7f104f).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-11-07 Thread sethah
Github user sethah commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
@MLnick I updated it with your suggested wording for the comments. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-11-03 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68084/
Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-11-03 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
**[Test build #68084 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68084/consoleFull)**
 for PR 15593 at commit 
[`210e1d3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/210e1d307ffd63b797bcae45bb2dc49e0d10c586).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-11-03 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-11-03 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
**[Test build #68084 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/68084/consoleFull)**
 for PR 15593 at commit 
[`210e1d3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/210e1d307ffd63b797bcae45bb2dc49e0d10c586).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-10-31 Thread dbtsai
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
@sethah I'm recently busy on company work. Will start to work on open 
source code review soon this week.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-10-31 Thread sethah
Github user sethah commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
ping @MLnick @jkbradley This should be a nice performance boost for MLOR in 
ML, hopefully we can get it in for 2.1. If you get some time to review or run 
tests I'd really appreciate it. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-10-21 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67362/
Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-10-21 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-10-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
**[Test build #67362 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67362/consoleFull)**
 for PR 15593 at commit 
[`07fd150`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/07fd1504136ad7b1ce37f443e26f407b07345991).
 * This patch passes all tests.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-10-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
**[Test build #67362 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67362/consoleFull)**
 for PR 15593 at commit 
[`07fd150`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/07fd1504136ad7b1ce37f443e26f407b07345991).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark issue #15593: [SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR

2016-10-21 Thread sethah
Github user sethah commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
  
cc @dbtsai 

This may improve the problems you mentioned you were having on 
[SPARK-17134](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17134) :)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org