[GitHub] spark issue #20274: [SPARK-20120][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Better way to support spar...
Github user srowen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20274 Merged to master --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #20274: [SPARK-20120][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Better way to support spar...
Github user wangyum commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20274 @srowen I have updated. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #20274: [SPARK-20120][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Better way to support spar...
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20274 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #20274: [SPARK-20120][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Better way to support spar...
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20274 **[Test build #90564 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90564/testReport)** for PR 20274 at commit [`0501653`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/050165302062aeddbe1c9c598ecc29abf8858c55). * This patch passes all tests. * This patch merges cleanly. * This patch adds no public classes. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #20274: [SPARK-20120][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Better way to support spar...
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20274 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90564/ Test PASSed. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #20274: [SPARK-20120][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Better way to support spar...
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20274 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/3183/ Test PASSed. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #20274: [SPARK-20120][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Better way to support spar...
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20274 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #20274: [SPARK-20120][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Better way to support spar...
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20274 **[Test build #90564 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90564/testReport)** for PR 20274 at commit [`0501653`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/050165302062aeddbe1c9c598ecc29abf8858c55). --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #20274: [SPARK-20120][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Better way to support spar...
Github user srowen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20274 This seems fine, but, needs to be updated to merge again. I also don't see what it has to do with kubernetes jars though. I suspect there's a log4j classpath issue in play here, but this maybe avoids it, whatever it is. Which is good. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #20274: [SPARK-20120][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Better way to support spar...
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20274 @liufengdb Can you verify this one? --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #20274: [SPARK-20120][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Better way to support spar...
Github user wangyum commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20274 The [Pre-build spark](https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v2.3.0-rc2-bin/) contains `kubernetes-model-2.0.0.jar`. but the below command will not contain this jar: ``` ./dev/make-distribution.sh --tgz -Phadoop-2.7 -Phive -Phive-thriftserver -Pyarn -DskipTests ``` --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #20274: [SPARK-20120][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Better way to support spar...
Github user wangyum commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20274 An interesting discovery: if `SPARK_HOME/jars` missing `kubernetes-model-2.0.0.jar`, the silent mode is broken. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #20274: [SPARK-20120][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Better way to support spar...
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20274 How is the silent mode broken? Could you elaborate on that? --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #20274: [SPARK-20120][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Better way to support spar...
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20274 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #20274: [SPARK-20120][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Better way to support spar...
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20274 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86146/ Test PASSed. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #20274: [SPARK-20120][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Better way to support spar...
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20274 **[Test build #86146 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86146/testReport)** for PR 20274 at commit [`83a844b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/83a844b2c221eea4b02cb6816bd2c6017cd1e1fc). * This patch passes all tests. * This patch merges cleanly. * This patch adds no public classes. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
[GitHub] spark issue #20274: [SPARK-20120][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Better way to support spar...
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20274 **[Test build #86146 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86146/testReport)** for PR 20274 at commit [`83a844b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/83a844b2c221eea4b02cb6816bd2c6017cd1e1fc). --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
