[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-4970] Fix an implicit bug in SparkSubmi...

2014-12-26 Thread JoshRosen
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3805#issuecomment-68156011
  
Jenkins, this is ok to test.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-4970] Fix an implicit bug in SparkSubmi...

2014-12-26 Thread JoshRosen
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3805#issuecomment-68156052
  
Super-minor process nit, but do you mind moving your comment into the PR 
description itself?  The PR description automatically becomes the commit 
message, so keeping it up-to-date means less work for committers when they 
merge your PRs since they don't have to fix up the message by hand.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-4970] Fix an implicit bug in SparkSubmi...

2014-12-26 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3805#issuecomment-68156186
  
  [Test build #24839 has 
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24839/consoleFull)
 for   PR 3805 at commit 
[`41ede0e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/41ede0ee67f77e09f2abe96c981167ed671e0504).
 * This patch merges cleanly.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-4970] Fix an implicit bug in SparkSubmi...

2014-12-26 Thread JoshRosen
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3805#issuecomment-68156238
  
This class of issue could be a more general problem for our test-suites, 
since I think there are a number of places where we call things like `new 
SparkConf()` that might implicitly read defaults from the configuration file.

I wonder if there's a more general fix, such as using `Utils.isTesting` to 
bypass the defaults loading in unit tests.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-4970] Fix an implicit bug in SparkSubmi...

2014-12-26 Thread JoshRosen
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3805#issuecomment-68156344
  
Also, the PR / JIRA title is confusing; I can't really guess what this 
patch does based on the title, since fix an implicit bug could mean many 
different things.  A better title would be something like Do not read 
spark.executor.memory from spark-defaults.conf in SparkSubmitSuite.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-4970] Fix an implicit bug in SparkSubmi...

2014-12-26 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3805#issuecomment-68159278
  
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): 
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24839/
Test PASSed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-4970] Fix an implicit bug in SparkSubmi...

2014-12-26 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3805#issuecomment-68159276
  
  [Test build #24839 has 
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24839/consoleFull)
 for   PR 3805 at commit 
[`41ede0e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/41ede0ee67f77e09f2abe96c981167ed671e0504).
 * This patch **passes all tests**.
 * This patch merges cleanly.
 * This patch adds no public classes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-4970] Fix an implicit bug in SparkSubmi...

2014-12-25 Thread maropu
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3805#issuecomment-68117570
  
The test 'includes jars passed in through --jars’ in SparkSubmitSuite 
fails
when spark.executor.memory is set at over 512MiB in conf/spark-default.conf.
An exception is thrown as follows:
Exception in thread main org.apache.spark.SparkException: Asked to launch 
cluster with 512 MB RAM / worker but requested 1024 MB/worker
at 
org.apache.spark.SparkContext$.org$apache$spark$SparkContext$$createTaskScheduler(SparkContext.scala:1889)
at org.apache.spark.SparkContext.init(SparkContext.scala:322)
at org.apache.spark.deploy.JarCreationTest$.main(SparkSubmitSuite.scala:458)
at org.apache.spark.deploy.JarCreationTest.main(SparkSubmitSuite.scala)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit$.launch(SparkSubmit.scala:367)
at org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit$.main(SparkSubmit.scala:75)
at org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit.main(SparkSubmit.scala)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org



[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-4970] Fix an implicit bug in SparkSubmi...

2014-12-25 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3805#issuecomment-68117596
  
Can one of the admins verify this patch?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org