Re: Any idea why this job failed?
On Tuesday 27 January 2009, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > From > http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/2589-b >lcr-0.8.0-1.fc11/x86_64/job.log > > http://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/fedora/linux/development/x86_6 >4/os/repodata/2d042767e0bcc495894dc71bca9afeb752afe233c9cdca04ca81b1e7383d36 >eb-primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno -3] Error performing checksum > Trying other mirror. > Error: failure: > repodata/2d042767e0bcc495894dc71bca9afeb752afe233c9cdca04ca81b1e7383d36eb-p >rimary.sqlite.bz2 from fedora-everything: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to > try. Yes, but what does this mean?
Re: Any idea why this job failed?
From http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/2589-blcr-0.8.0-1.fc11/x86_64/job.log http://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/repodata/2d042767e0bcc495894dc71bca9afeb752afe233c9cdca04ca81b1e7383d36eb-primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno -3] Error performing checksum Trying other mirror. Error: failure: repodata/2d042767e0bcc495894dc71bca9afeb752afe233c9cdca04ca81b1e7383d36eb-primary.sqlite.bz2 from fedora-everything: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.
Any idea why this job failed?
I looked at the logs, but I have no clue: http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/2589- blcr-0.8.0-1.fc11/
Re: make build - nothing happens
On Tuesday 27 January 2009, David Timms wrote: > Neal Becker wrote: > > My first rpmfusion package. > > CVSROOT=:ext:nbec...@cvs.rpmfusion.org:/cvs/free cvs co blcr > > Did you do [export CVS_RSH=ssh] ? > > > cvs checkout: Updating blcr > > ... > > > > [nbec...@nbecker1 ~]$ cd blcr > > [nbec...@nbecker1 blcr]$ cd devel > > [nbec...@nbecker1 devel]$ ls > > [nbec...@nbecker1 devel]$ make build > > rpm: no arguments given for query > > rpm: no arguments given for query > > [... nothing happens ...] > > You didn't mention whether you have imported your approved source rpm yet ? > http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#head-ecd81860c9b7e5192904b03bd0ab6f07980b >81a6 > > DaveT. Thanks guys. Forgot a couple of steps :)
Re: make build - nothing happens
Neal Becker wrote: My first rpmfusion package. CVSROOT=:ext:nbec...@cvs.rpmfusion.org:/cvs/free cvs co blcr Did you do [export CVS_RSH=ssh] ? cvs checkout: Updating blcr ... [nbec...@nbecker1 ~]$ cd blcr [nbec...@nbecker1 blcr]$ cd devel [nbec...@nbecker1 devel]$ ls [nbec...@nbecker1 devel]$ make build rpm: no arguments given for query rpm: no arguments given for query [... nothing happens ...] You didn't mention whether you have imported your approved source rpm yet ? http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#head-ecd81860c9b7e5192904b03bd0ab6f07980b81a6 DaveT.
Re: make build - nothing happens
Neal Becker wrote: My first rpmfusion package. CVSROOT=:ext:nbec...@cvs.rpmfusion.org:/cvs/free cvs co blcr cvs checkout: Updating blcr ... [nbec...@nbecker1 ~]$ cd blcr [nbec...@nbecker1 blcr]$ cd devel [nbec...@nbecker1 devel]$ ls [nbec...@nbecker1 devel]$ make build rpm: no arguments given for query rpm: no arguments given for query [... nothing happens ...] Is there a specfile in the devel/ dir? -- Rex
make build - nothing happens
My first rpmfusion package. CVSROOT=:ext:nbec...@cvs.rpmfusion.org:/cvs/free cvs co blcr cvs checkout: Updating blcr ... [nbec...@nbecker1 ~]$ cd blcr [nbec...@nbecker1 blcr]$ cd devel [nbec...@nbecker1 devel]$ ls [nbec...@nbecker1 devel]$ make build rpm: no arguments given for query rpm: no arguments given for query [... nothing happens ...]
[Bug 19] Review request: blcr - Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19 Thorsten Leemhuis changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|33 | --- Comment #33 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-01-27 19:19:12 --- CVS done -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 20] Review request: blcr-kmod - kmod for Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20 Thorsten Leemhuis changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|33 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug 20] Review request: blcr-kmod - kmod for Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20 --- Comment #14 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-01-27 19:18:46 --- CVS done. But please, next time try to be a bit more careful and stick to the template as shown in the wiki: (In reply to comment #13) > Package CVS request > == > Package Name: blcr Should have been: Package Name: blcr-kmod > Short Description: Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux (BLCR) > > This package implements system-level checkpointing of scientific applications > in a manner suitable for implementing preemption, migration and fault recovery > by a batch scheduler. "Short Description" is a one line argument > Owners: ndbeck...@gmail.com A email address is no fasname > Branches: F9, F10 Should have been "F-9 F-10" -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Re: Where we are and where do we what to go?
On 27.01.2009 18:48, Andrea Musuruane wrote: On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: We already have a page in the wiki to track third party repositories. http://rpmfusion.org/FedoraThirdPartyRepos If all of us contribute a little to track down the maintainers, we could at least try to contact them, ask them to join, listen to their complains, guide them in the project. Strong +1 I have updated the wiki page adding many contact info. Many thx for that. Three small details: - users in the past could easily see which repos were compatible with RPM fusion and which not; now that easily lost in the noise; I'm wondering if it would have been better to split the information that are relevant for us and those that are relevant for users into separate pages - how about fields like "Last Contacted" and/or "interested in merging with RPM Fusion". - some of the repos seem to be outdated (Dr Pixel; Fedora-xgl); should we remove them? CU knurd
[Bug 20] Review request: blcr-kmod - kmod for Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20 Neal Becker changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||33 --- Comment #13 from Neal Becker 2009-01-27 18:56:28 --- Package CVS request == Package Name: blcr Short Description: Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux (BLCR) This package implements system-level checkpointing of scientific applications in a manner suitable for implementing preemption, migration and fault recovery by a batch scheduler. Owners: ndbeck...@gmail.com Branches: F9, F10 InitialCC: -- License tag: free -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Re: Where we are and where do we what to go?
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> We already have a page in the wiki to track third party repositories. >> http://rpmfusion.org/FedoraThirdPartyRepos >> >> If all of us contribute a little to track down the maintainers, we >> could at least try to contact them, ask them to join, listen to their >> complains, guide them in the project. >> > > Strong +1 I have updated the wiki page adding many contact info. Plase add others if you /know them. Bye, Andrea.
Re: yum still wants to install kmod-nvidia
On 27.01.2009 14:51, Neal Becker wrote: I thought that if I had akmod-nvidia yum would not want to install kmod- nvidia? That's how it should work. There was a bug and hence it didn#t work, but that should be fixed now. I don't have kmod-nvidia, as you can see, but yum wants to install it: > [...] The data wasn't sufficient to debug the problem. Yum normally should have printed more information earlier -- those would be interesting. Cu knurd
Re: kqemu starts before akmods
On 27.01.2009 13:19, Neal Becker wrote: I noticed on restart today (after kernel update) that kqemu start failed, complaining about lack of kqemu.ko, because it started before akmods ran. Please use bugzilla.rpmfusion.org to file bugs -- not all maintainers are on this list; others might, but it's easy to miss or forget about mailing list reports like this. I'd tend to say file against kqemu -- it likely should start later during boot if there is no strong need to start that early. akmods already has problem due to starting so early, as it seems runuser doesn't work properly on systems that use LDAP; details: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=255 If somebody has and idea how to fix this/work around this please let me know CU knurd
[Bug 20] Review request: blcr-kmod - kmod for Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20 Thorsten Leemhuis changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|3 |4 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #12 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-01-27 18:15:24 --- I still dislike how long it takes to build this; but whatever: approved -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
yum still wants to install kmod-nvidia
I thought that if I had akmod-nvidia yum would not want to install kmod- nvidia? I don't have kmod-nvidia, as you can see, but yum wants to install it: Updating: buildsys-build-rpmfusion x86_64 10:10-0.16 rpmfusion-free-updates 12 k buildsys-build-rpmfusion-kerneldevpkgs-current x86_64 10:10-0.16 rpmfusion-free-updates9.5 k kmod-nvidia-2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 180.22-1.fc10.1 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 2.6 M xine-lib-extras-freeworld x86_64 1.1.16.1-1.fc10 rpmfusion-free-updates384 k Transaction Summary = Install 0 Package(s) Update 4 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 3.0 M Is this ok [y/N]: n Exiting on user Command Complete! [nbec...@nbecker1 ~]$ rpm -q kmod-nvidia package kmod-nvidia is not installed [nbec...@nbecker1 ~]$ rpm -q akmod-nvidia akmod-nvidia-180.22-1.fc10.x86_64
Re: Where we are and where do we what to go - encouraging third party repos.
Andrea Musuruane wrote: invite 3rd party maintainers again and ask them to join. If they don't want to join, we should politely ask why. We should stress about our strengths and the benefits of joining (only one repo, very visible, peer review to improve quality, build system, cvs, etc). - Are we better at backups ? How are we protected from various potential hardware failures / issues ? - Can we present estimates on user base ? for each repo ? [and if this is bigger than I imagined - would making such info available potentially bring the big fish circling - trying to get packages removed and so forth ?]. - Having lots of regularly updated mirrors is a positive to mention; leads to faster user installs and updates, and (if mirrormanager is giving out a prioritized list) better resiliency. They would be welcome to become an extra mirror, so that their exsting resources (web host, bandwidth) can still be used if they wish. - Having external packagers being able to easily manage the actual package push requst (bohdi), and to easily link amongst cvs, koji, bohdi and package db - just like fedora - would probably help them to feel that they are still reasonably in control. Although, this gets back to limited persons with the sign/push capability. DaveT.
RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2009-01-27
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 10: 6 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.16-1.fc10 nvidia-beta-kmod-180.11.02-1.fc10 nvidia-kmod-180.25-1.fc10 NEW xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-173.14.16-1.fc10 : NVIDIA's 173xx serie proprietary display driver for NVIDIA graphic cards xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-180.25-1.fc10 NEW xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-beta-180.11.02-2.fc10 : NVIDIA's proprietary display driver for NVIDIA graphic cards Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 9: 2 nvidia-beta-kmod-180.11.02-1.fc9 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-beta-180.11.02-2.fc9 Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 4 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.16-1.fc11 nvidia-kmod-180.25-1.fc11 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-173.14.16-1.fc11 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-180.25-1.fc11 Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 10: nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.16-1.fc10 -- * Tue Jan 27 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 173.14.16-1 - Update to 173.14.16 (beta) nvidia-beta-kmod-180.11.02-1.fc10 - * Tue Jan 27 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.11.02-1 - Update to 180.11.02 (opengl 3.0 beta) - Sync for F-10 nvidia-kmod-180.25-1.fc10 - * Tue Jan 27 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.25-1 - Update to 180.25 (beta) xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-173.14.16-1.fc10 -- * Tue Jan 27 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 173.14.16-1 - Update to 173.14.16 (beta) xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-180.25-1.fc10 - * Tue Jan 27 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.25-1 - Update to 180.25 (beta) xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-beta-180.11.02-2.fc10 - * Sun Jan 25 2009 Stewart Adam < s.adam at diffingo.com > - 180.11.02-2 - Fix initscript search locations (schlobinux_) Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 9: nvidia-beta-kmod-180.11.02-1.fc9 * Tue Jan 27 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.11.02-1 - Update to 180.11.02 (opengl 3.0 beta) - Sync for F-9 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-beta-180.11.02-2.fc9 * Sun Jan 25 2009 Stewart Adam < s.adam at diffingo.com > - 180.11.02-2 - Fix initscript search locations (schlobinux_) * Wed Dec 17 2008 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.11.02-1 - Update to 180.11.02 (opengl 3.0 beta) Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.16-1.fc11 -- * Tue Jan 27 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 173.14.16-1 - Update to 173.14.16 (beta) nvidia-kmod-180.25-1.fc11 - * Tue Jan 27 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.25-1 - Update to 180.25 (beta) xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-173.14.16-1.fc11 -- * Tue Jan 27 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 173.14.16-1 - Update to 173.14.16 (beta) xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-180.25-1.fc11 - * Tue Jan 27 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 180.25-1 - Update to 180.25 (beta)
kqemu starts before akmods
I noticed on restart today (after kernel update) that kqemu start failed, complaining about lack of kqemu.ko, because it started before akmods ran.
RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2009-01-27
Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 10: 15 buildsys-build-rpmfusion-10-0.16 em8300-kmod-0.17.2-1.fc10.8 iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.15-41.svn147.fc10.13 kqemu-kmod-1.3.0-0.42.fc10.13 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.53-5.fc10.13 open-vm-tools-0.0.0.137496-1.fc10 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.137496-1.fc10 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.137496-1.fc10.1 qc-usb-kmod-0.6.6-42.fc10.12 rt2860-kmod-1.8.0.0-3.fc10 rt2860-kmod-1.8.0.0-3.fc10.1 rt2870-kmod-1.4.0.0-4.fc10 rt2870-kmod-1.4.0.0-5.fc10 rt2870-kmod-1.4.0.0-5.fc10.1 xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.1-1.fc10 Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: 2 NEW libmad-0.15.1b-9.fc10 : MPEG audio decoder library rt2870-kmod-1.4.0.0-6.fc10 Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 9: 10 buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-26 em8300-kmod-0.17.2-1.fc9.8 iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.15-41.svn147.fc9.10 kqemu-kmod-1.3.0-0.42.fc9.10 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.53-5.fc9.10 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.123053-1.fc9.7 qc-usb-kmod-0.6.6-42.fc9.8 rt2860-kmod-1.8.0.0-1.fc9.10 rt2870-kmod-1.4.0.0-3.fc9 rt2870-kmod-1.4.0.0-3.fc9.1 Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: 2 libmad-0.15.1b-9.fc9 rt2870-kmod-1.4.0.0-4.fc9 Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 2 libmad-0.15.1b-9.fc11 rt2870-kmod-1.4.0.0-6.fc11 Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 10: buildsys-build-rpmfusion-10-0.16 * Sat Jan 24 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 10:10-0.16 - rebuild for kernel 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10 * Sat Jan 24 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 10:10-0.15 - rebuild for kernel 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10 em8300-kmod-0.17.2-1.fc10.8 --- * Sat Jan 24 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.17.2-1.8 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; iscsitarget-kmod-0.4.15-41.svn147.fc10.13 - * Sat Jan 24 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1:0.4.15-41.svn147.13 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; kqemu-kmod-1.3.0-0.42.fc10.13 - * Sat Jan 24 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.3.0-0.42.13 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; ndiswrapper-kmod-1.53-5.fc10.13 --- * Sat Jan 24 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.53-5.13 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; open-vm-tools-0.0.0.137496-1.fc10 - * Wed Jan 14 2009 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.137496-1 - Update to upstream 137496 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.137496-1.fc10 -- * Wed Jan 14 2009 Denis Leroy - 0.0.0.137496-1 - Update to upstream build 137496 open-vm-tools-kmod-0.0.0.137496-1.fc10.1 * Sat Jan 24 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.0.0.137496-1.1 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; qc-usb-kmod-0.6.6-42.fc10.12 * Sat Jan 24 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 0.6.6-42.12 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; rt2860-kmod-1.8.0.0-3.fc10 -- * Sun Jan 11 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 1.8.0.0-3 - Add a patch for compilation against kernels >= 2.6.29 rt2860-kmod-1.8.0.0-3.fc10.1 * Sat Jan 24 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.8.0.0-3.1 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; rt2870-kmod-1.4.0.0-4.fc10 -- * Sun Jan 11 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 1.4.0.0-4 - Add a patch for compilation against kernels >= 2.6.29 rt2870-kmod-1.4.0.0-5.fc10 -- * Thu Jan 15 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 1.4.0.0-5 - Add Buffalo WLI-UC-G300N support rt2870-kmod-1.4.0.0-5.fc10.1 * Sat Jan 24 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis - 1.4.0.0-5.1 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; xine-lib-extras-freeworld-1.1.16.1-1.fc10 - * Fri Jan 23 2009 Rex Dieter - 1.1.16.1-1 - xine-lib-1.1.16.1 * Sun Jan 18 2009 Rex Dieter - 1.1.16-3 - drop deepbind patch - --with-external-libfaad (fedora) * Thu Jan 08 2009 Rex Dieter - 1.1.16-2 - drop ffmpeg_api patch (not needed) - internal_ffmpeg patch Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/10: libmad-0.15.1b-9.fc10 - * Sun Jan 25 2009 David Juran - 0.15.1b-9 - fix multiarch (Bz 264) rt2870-kmod-1.4.0.0-6.fc10 -- * Sun Jan 25 2009 Orcan Ogetbil - 1.4.0.0-6 - Add Belkin F5D8053 support
[Bug 285] Review Request: VirtualBox-OSE - A general-purpose full virtualizer for PC hardware
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285 --- Comment #8 from Thorsten Leemhuis 2009-01-27 09:17:45 --- When rebuilding VirtualBox-OSE-2.1.2-1.el5.src.rpm on F10 x86_64: > + ./configure --disable-kmods --with-gcc-compat=gcc34 --disable-qt3 > Unrecognized option "--with-gcc-compat=gcc34" -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug.
