Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Seg, 2015-11-09 at 22:42 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 
> 
> 2015-11-07 20:45 GMT+01:00 Sérgio Basto :
> On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 12:07 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > I would like theses two tasks to be picked by others.
> >
> >
> >
> > There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as
> they wasn't
> > updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ ABI
> changes.
> > If someone can bring me a list I will submit them for
> rebuild next
> > week.
> >
> >
> > Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their
> latest
> > upstream or matching their fedora counterpart (faac,
> > audacity-freeworld, etc). I would like to have maintainers
> contact
> > provenpackager (that have access to the git preview repo) so
> they can
> > fetch the update of theses packages.
> >
> > Best would be to make a general review of missing updates.
> >
> Also we need mock for F23 !
>  
> Ok, and what need to be done to have it  ?
> https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/mock-rpmfusion 
> 
Do you want that I fork and update it ? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -
> 
> 
> Nicolas (kwizart)
> 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2015-11-09 22:45 GMT+01:00 Sérgio Basto :

> On Seg, 2015-11-09 at 22:42 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> ...
> > Ok, and what need to be done to have it  ?
> > https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/mock-rpmfusion
> >
> Do you want that I fork and update it ?
>


Less question and more work please!
-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2015-11-07 20:45 GMT+01:00 Sérgio Basto :

> On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 12:07 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > I would like theses two tasks to be picked by others.
> >
> >
> >
> > There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they wasn't
> > updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ ABI changes.
> > If someone can bring me a list I will submit them for rebuild next
> > week.
> >
> >
> > Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their latest
> > upstream or matching their fedora counterpart (faac,
> > audacity-freeworld, etc). I would like to have maintainers contact
> > provenpackager (that have access to the git preview repo) so they can
> > fetch the update of theses packages.
> >
> > Best would be to make a general review of missing updates.
> >
> Also we need mock for F23 !
>

Ok, and what need to be done to have it  ?
https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/mock-rpmfusion




-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2015-11-07 15:12 GMT+01:00 Richard Shaw :

> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet  wrote:
>
>> There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they wasn't
>> updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ ABI changes. If
>> someone can bring me a list I will submit them for rebuild next week.
>>
>
> I don't mind helping with this but what tool would I use to determine
> which packages still need to be rebuilt?
>
>
>
>> Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their latest upstream
>> or matching their fedora counterpart (faac, audacity-freeworld, etc). I
>> would like to have maintainers contact provenpackager (that have access to
>> the git preview repo) so they can fetch the update of theses packages.
>> Best would be to make a general review of missing updates.
>>
>
> I know sox-plugins-{freeworld,nonfree} need to be updated for F22+ but it
> requires a patch to expose two more private symbols (after upstream hid
> them in 14.4.2). I have contacted Fedora sox maintainers but haven't gotten
> a response yet. I actually submitted a bug upstream but it has gotten
> *ZERO* response so I spent 3 hours figuring it out which my $DAYJOB
> unknowingly sponsored.
>
Okay so it means sox*-freeworld will need to be discarded from the RPM
Fusion "GA" repository and will be made available as a regular update.
Can you properly track this request to a bugzilla blocking # f23 blocker
bugs.

For the info, having to read all singles messages for off-topic issue is
really exhausting.
Can't you just report a bug and block #3799


Thx

-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2015-11-07 18:20 GMT+01:00 Sérgio Basto :

> On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 15:05 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet 
> > > wrote:
> > > There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they
> > > wasn't updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++
> > > ABI changes. If someone can bring me a list I will submit them
> > > for rebuild next week.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't mind helping with this but what tool would I use to determine
> > > which packages still need to be rebuilt?
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their
> > > latest upstream or matching their fedora counterpart (faac,
> > > audacity-freeworld, etc). I would like to have maintainers
> > > contact provenpackager (that have access to the git preview
> > > repo) so they can fetch the update of theses packages.
> > >
> > > Best would be to make a general review of missing updates.
> > >
> > I have scripts in my vm with F23 to determinate what we need rebuild ,
> > I'll try send the list this afternoon.
> >
> > Also got some other information about package that are missing (not
> > enter) in F22 and F23 , because, I think, they won't build in new koji
> > system .
>
> 1- query all rpmfusion package and date it :
> repoquery --archlist=i386,i686
> --disablerepo=rawhide,fedora\*,updates\*,peem-kde4-fedora,sergiomb-vboxfor23
> -a --qf "%{buildtime:isodate} %{name}-%{version}-%{release}" > listall.txt
>
> 2 - all build times of package with tag fc23 are after 2015-10-24 , so no
> need to rebuild:
> cat listall.txt | grep fc23 | sort -nr
>
> 3 - packages to rebuild (are the packages with fc22 tag):
> cat listall.txt | grep fc22  | cut -b 21- | xargs repoquery --source |
> sort -u
> after pipe  with perl -pe 's/-\d.*?-\d+(\..*)?\.fc\d+(\..*)?.src.rpm//' we
> got the list in attachment
>
> 4 - packages without fc22 or fc23 tag:
> cat listall.txt | grep -vP "fc22|fc23"
> Only ufoai-data-2.4-1 and ufoai-data-server-2.4-1  more  buildsys and
> releases packages
>
> Last note multilibs have problems, for example x265 [1] , to workaround
> this issue, I had repoquery i386 arch with --archlist=i386,i686
>
> It would have been nice to split it between free and nonfree, but I can
deal with that.
>From this list, can someone check that there is no needed update ?

I will not bump the spec, only build a .fc23 version of the latest spec.
So there is no provenpackager needs to handle this.

Thx


-- 
-

Nicolas (kwizart)

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

[Nicolas Chauvet]

2015-11-09 11:12 GMT+01:00 Karel Volný :

>
> Hi,
>
> while at it, can someone please update http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors
> with links to git, or where the new work should be done?
>

It should be available once the rfpkg tool comes up into the repos,
Please do not pulblish the git preview url from my infra for any reason,
thoses are temporary.

Use the github.com/rpmfusion url at least.

Thx

Nicolas (kwizart)

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

[Karel Volný]

Hi,

while at it, can someone please update http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors 
with links to git, or where the new work should be done?


K.

--
Karel Volný
QE BaseOs/Daemons Team
Red Hat Czech, Brno
tel. +420 532294274
(RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074)
xmpp ka...@jabber.cz
:: "Never attribute to malice what can
::  easily be explained by stupidity."

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

[Karel Volný]

Hi,

Dne sobota 7. listopadu 2015 18:20:59 CET, Sérgio Basto  napsal(a):

4 - packages without fc22 or fc23 tag:
cat listall.txt | grep -vP "fc22|fc23"
Only ufoai-data-2.4-1 and ufoai-data-server-2.4-1


note that there is new upstream version which should go to Fedora as the 
license issues were cleaned up


unfortunately, the review request[*] got stuck; shame on me, but I have 
other priorities than playing games :-/ - helping hands highly welcome


until there's some progress, it'd be nice if we can keep at least the old 
version ... the datafiles are without disttag to save space, these do not 
change between fedora versions


K.

[*] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157255

--
Karel Volný
QE BaseOs/Daemons Team
Red Hat Czech, Brno
tel. +420 532294274
(RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074)
xmpp ka...@jabber.cz
:: "Never attribute to malice what can
::  easily be explained by stupidity."

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 08-11-15 16:34, Sérgio Basto wrote:

Hi,
On Dom, 2015-11-08 at 15:17 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:

Hi,

On 07-11-15 18:20, Sérgio Basto wrote:

On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 15:05 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:

On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet 
wrote:
  There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they
  wasn't updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++
  ABI changes. If someone can bring me a list I will submit them
  for rebuild next week.



I don't mind helping with this but what tool would I use to determine
which packages still need to be rebuilt?






  Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their
  latest upstream or matching their fedora counterpart (faac,
  audacity-freeworld, etc). I would like to have maintainers
  contact provenpackager (that have access to the git preview
  repo) so they can fetch the update of theses packages.

  Best would be to make a general review of missing updates.


I have scripts in my vm with F23 to determinate what we need rebuild ,
I'll try send the list this afternoon.

Also got some other information about package that are missing (not
enter) in F22 and F23 , because, I think, they won't build in new koji
system .


1- query all rpmfusion package and date it :
repoquery --archlist=i386,i686 
--disablerepo=rawhide,fedora\*,updates\*,peem-kde4-fedora,sergiomb-vboxfor23 -a --qf 
"%{buildtime:isodate} %{name}-%{version}-%{release}" > listall.txt

2 - all build times of package with tag fc23 are after 2015-10-24 , so no need 
to rebuild:
cat listall.txt | grep fc23 | sort -nr

3 - packages to rebuild (are the packages with fc22 tag):
cat listall.txt | grep fc22  | cut -b 21- | xargs repoquery --source | sort -u
after pipe  with perl -pe 's/-\d.*?-\d+(\..*)?\.fc\d+(\..*)?.src.rpm//' we got 
the list in attachment

4 - packages without fc22 or fc23 tag:
cat listall.txt | grep -vP "fc22|fc23"
Only ufoai-data-2.4-1 and ufoai-data-server-2.4-1  more  buildsys and
releases packages


Sergio, Thanks for generating the list (attached to Sergio's original mail) but 
I do not
think this is what Nicolas had in mind, AFAICT Nicolas only wants to rebuild 
packages
which must be rebuilt due to c++ ABI changes and keep the rest as is. So not 
rebuild
all packages which have not been rebuild yet.


Thanks but I thought that is to follow Fedora and it was all packages
[1], I ask that at the time.

Anyway, Nicolas mention an provenpackager, I don't mind take care of the
mass rebuild , just need some instructions and the OK from Nicolas.

Another topic, that I not take care, is the packages that need matching
their fedora counterpart , can someone list it ? , are they only all
freeworld packages ? or we have exceptions ?


I think that *freeworld is a good start, I do not know any exceptions from
the top of my head. If anyone knows of any exceptions please speak-up now.

Regards,

Hans

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

[Sérgio Basto]

Hi,
On Dom, 2015-11-08 at 15:17 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 07-11-15 18:20, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 15:05 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >> On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>  There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they
> >>>  wasn't updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++
> >>>  ABI changes. If someone can bring me a list I will submit them
> >>>  for rebuild next week.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I don't mind helping with this but what tool would I use to determine
> >>> which packages still need to be rebuilt?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>  Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their
> >>>  latest upstream or matching their fedora counterpart (faac,
> >>>  audacity-freeworld, etc). I would like to have maintainers
> >>>  contact provenpackager (that have access to the git preview
> >>>  repo) so they can fetch the update of theses packages.
> >>>
> >>>  Best would be to make a general review of missing updates.
> >>>
> >> I have scripts in my vm with F23 to determinate what we need rebuild ,
> >> I'll try send the list this afternoon.
> >>
> >> Also got some other information about package that are missing (not
> >> enter) in F22 and F23 , because, I think, they won't build in new koji
> >> system .
> >
> > 1- query all rpmfusion package and date it :
> > repoquery --archlist=i386,i686 
> > --disablerepo=rawhide,fedora\*,updates\*,peem-kde4-fedora,sergiomb-vboxfor23
> >  -a --qf "%{buildtime:isodate} %{name}-%{version}-%{release}" > listall.txt
> >
> > 2 - all build times of package with tag fc23 are after 2015-10-24 , so no 
> > need to rebuild:
> > cat listall.txt | grep fc23 | sort -nr
> >
> > 3 - packages to rebuild (are the packages with fc22 tag):
> > cat listall.txt | grep fc22  | cut -b 21- | xargs repoquery --source | sort 
> > -u
> > after pipe  with perl -pe 's/-\d.*?-\d+(\..*)?\.fc\d+(\..*)?.src.rpm//' we 
> > got the list in attachment
> >
> > 4 - packages without fc22 or fc23 tag:
> > cat listall.txt | grep -vP "fc22|fc23"
> > Only ufoai-data-2.4-1 and ufoai-data-server-2.4-1  more  buildsys and
> > releases packages
> 
> Sergio, Thanks for generating the list (attached to Sergio's original mail) 
> but I do not
> think this is what Nicolas had in mind, AFAICT Nicolas only wants to rebuild 
> packages
> which must be rebuilt due to c++ ABI changes and keep the rest as is. So not 
> rebuild
> all packages which have not been rebuild yet.

Thanks but I thought that is to follow Fedora and it was all packages
[1], I ask that at the time.

Anyway, Nicolas mention an provenpackager, I don't mind take care of the
mass rebuild , just need some instructions and the OK from Nicolas.

Another topic, that I not take care, is the packages that need matching
their fedora counterpart , can someone list it ? , are they only all
freeworld packages ? or we have exceptions ? 

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/msg211560.html 

> I do not have (much) time to work on this myself, but if there is anything 
> specific
> I can help with (ie specific FTBFS errors), let me know and I'll gladly help.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hans

Thanks,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 07-11-15 18:20, Sérgio Basto wrote:

On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 15:05 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:

On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet 
wrote:
 There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they
 wasn't updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++
 ABI changes. If someone can bring me a list I will submit them
 for rebuild next week.



I don't mind helping with this but what tool would I use to determine
which packages still need to be rebuilt?






 Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their
 latest upstream or matching their fedora counterpart (faac,
 audacity-freeworld, etc). I would like to have maintainers
 contact provenpackager (that have access to the git preview
 repo) so they can fetch the update of theses packages.

 Best would be to make a general review of missing updates.


I have scripts in my vm with F23 to determinate what we need rebuild ,
I'll try send the list this afternoon.

Also got some other information about package that are missing (not
enter) in F22 and F23 , because, I think, they won't build in new koji
system .


1- query all rpmfusion package and date it :
repoquery --archlist=i386,i686 
--disablerepo=rawhide,fedora\*,updates\*,peem-kde4-fedora,sergiomb-vboxfor23 -a --qf 
"%{buildtime:isodate} %{name}-%{version}-%{release}" > listall.txt

2 - all build times of package with tag fc23 are after 2015-10-24 , so no need 
to rebuild:
cat listall.txt | grep fc23 | sort -nr

3 - packages to rebuild (are the packages with fc22 tag):
cat listall.txt | grep fc22  | cut -b 21- | xargs repoquery --source | sort -u
after pipe  with perl -pe 's/-\d.*?-\d+(\..*)?\.fc\d+(\..*)?.src.rpm//' we got 
the list in attachment

4 - packages without fc22 or fc23 tag:
cat listall.txt | grep -vP "fc22|fc23"
Only ufoai-data-2.4-1 and ufoai-data-server-2.4-1  more  buildsys and
releases packages


Segio, Thanks for generating the list (attached to Segio's original mail) but I 
do not
think this is what Nicolas had in mind, AFAICT Nicolas only wants to rebuild 
packages
which must be rebuilt due to c++ ABI changes and keep the rest as is. So not 
rebuild
all packages which have not been rebuild yet.

I do not have (much) time to work on this myself, but if there is anything 
specific
I can help with (ie specific FTBFS errors), let me know and I'll gladly help.

Regards,

Hans

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness - provenpackagers list ?

[David Timms]

On 07/11/15 22:07, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Best would be to make a general review of missing updates.
Audacity-freeworld is mine.

The most recent release 2.1.1 is in f22 updates, but it appears only
2.0.6 is in F23 -free.

I've bee building git alpha audacity on Fedora COPR, but it's still some
time before 2.1.2 release (which requires wxgtk3).

I could be swayed either way in just getting 2.1.1 build for f23
rpmfusion, or going straight to the alpha (which is getting close to
release)  ?

ps: where is list of proven packagers we can submit changes to ?

Dave.

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

[Richard Shaw]

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet  wrote:

> There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they wasn't
> updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ ABI changes. If
> someone can bring me a list I will submit them for rebuild next week.
>

I don't mind helping with this but what tool would I use to determine which
packages still need to be rebuilt?



> Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their latest upstream
> or matching their fedora counterpart (faac, audacity-freeworld, etc). I
> would like to have maintainers contact provenpackager (that have access to
> the git preview repo) so they can fetch the update of theses packages.
> Best would be to make a general review of missing updates.
>

I know sox-plugins-{freeworld,nonfree} need to be updated for F22+ but it
requires a patch to expose two more private symbols (after upstream hid
them in 14.4.2). I have contacted Fedora sox maintainers but haven't gotten
a response yet. I actually submitted a bug upstream but it has gotten
*ZERO* response so I spent 3 hours figuring it out which my $DAYJOB
unknowingly sponsored.

Thanks,
Richard

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet 
> wrote:
> There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they
> wasn't updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++
> ABI changes. If someone can bring me a list I will submit them
> for rebuild next week.
> 
> 
> 
> I don't mind helping with this but what tool would I use to determine
> which packages still need to be rebuilt?



>  
> Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their
> latest upstream or matching their fedora counterpart (faac,
> audacity-freeworld, etc). I would like to have maintainers
> contact provenpackager (that have access to the git preview
> repo) so they can fetch the update of theses packages.
> 
> Best would be to make a general review of missing updates.
> 
I have scripts in my vm with F23 to determinate what we need rebuild ,
I'll try send the list this afternoon. 

Also got some other information about package that are missing (not
enter) in F22 and F23 , because, I think, they won't build in new koji
system .

> I know sox-plugins-{freeworld,nonfree} need to be updated for F22+ but
> it requires a patch to expose two more private symbols (after upstream
> hid them in 14.4.2). I have contacted Fedora sox maintainers but
> haven't gotten a response yet. I actually submitted a bug upstream but
> it has gotten *ZERO* response so I spent 3 hours figuring it out which
> my $DAYJOB unknowingly sponsored.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Richard

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 12:07 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> I would like theses two tasks to be picked by others.
> 
> 
> 
> There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they wasn't
> updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++ ABI changes.
> If someone can bring me a list I will submit them for rebuild next
> week.
> 
> 
> Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their latest
> upstream or matching their fedora counterpart (faac,
> audacity-freeworld, etc). I would like to have maintainers contact
> provenpackager (that have access to the git preview repo) so they can
> fetch the update of theses packages.
> 
> Best would be to make a general review of missing updates.
> 
Also we need mock for F23 ! 


> That would help me to concentrate on infra tasks.
> 
> 
> Then it will be possible to introduce new packages that will be git
> only (to answear the question from Mohamed).
> 
> 
> 
> Thx
> 
> -- 
> -
> 
> 
> Nicolas (kwizart)
> 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

Re: What is missing for f23 readyness ?

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 15:05 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Nicolas Chauvet 
> > wrote:
> > There is a number of packages that need to be rebuilt as they
> > wasn't updated for f23 "mass rebuilt" specially because of c++
> > ABI changes. If someone can bring me a list I will submit them
> > for rebuild next week.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I don't mind helping with this but what tool would I use to determine
> > which packages still need to be rebuilt?
> 
> 
> 
> >  
> > Also few packages and libraries was not updated to their
> > latest upstream or matching their fedora counterpart (faac,
> > audacity-freeworld, etc). I would like to have maintainers
> > contact provenpackager (that have access to the git preview
> > repo) so they can fetch the update of theses packages.
> > 
> > Best would be to make a general review of missing updates.
> > 
> I have scripts in my vm with F23 to determinate what we need rebuild ,
> I'll try send the list this afternoon. 
> 
> Also got some other information about package that are missing (not
> enter) in F22 and F23 , because, I think, they won't build in new koji
> system .

1- query all rpmfusion package and date it : 
repoquery --archlist=i386,i686 
--disablerepo=rawhide,fedora\*,updates\*,peem-kde4-fedora,sergiomb-vboxfor23 -a 
--qf "%{buildtime:isodate} %{name}-%{version}-%{release}" > listall.txt

2 - all build times of package with tag fc23 are after 2015-10-24 , so no need 
to rebuild:
cat listall.txt | grep fc23 | sort -nr

3 - packages to rebuild (are the packages with fc22 tag): 
cat listall.txt | grep fc22  | cut -b 21- | xargs repoquery --source | sort -u 
after pipe  with perl -pe 's/-\d.*?-\d+(\..*)?\.fc\d+(\..*)?.src.rpm//' we got 
the list in attachment 

4 - packages without fc22 or fc23 tag:
cat listall.txt | grep -vP "fc22|fc23"
Only ufoai-data-2.4-1 and ufoai-data-server-2.4-1  more  buildsys and
releases packages 
  
Last note multilibs have problems, for example x265 [1] , to workaround
this issue, I had repoquery i386 arch with --archlist=i386,i686 

 [1] 
2015-05-16 14:27:23 x265-1.6-1.fc22
2015-10-26 09:18:41 x265-1.8-1.fc23
2015-10-26 09:18:19 x265-devel-1.8-1.fc23
2015-10-26 09:18:41 x265-devel-1.8-1.fc23
2015-10-26 09:18:19 x265-libs-1.8-1.fc23
2015-10-26 09:18:41 x265-libs-1.8-1.fc23





> > I know sox-plugins-{freeworld,nonfree} need to be updated for F22+ but
> > it requires a patch to expose two more private symbols (after upstream
> > hid them in 14.4.2). I have contacted Fedora sox maintainers but
> > haven't gotten a response yet. I actually submitted a bug upstream but
> > it has gotten *ZERO* response so I spent 3 hours figuring it out which
> > my $DAYJOB unknowingly sponsored.
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Richard
> 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
abuse
amap
amrnb
amrwb
amule
aqualung
arcem
assaultcube
audacious-plugins-freeworld
audacity-freeworld
avidemux
bino
bombono-dvd
bsnes
bubbros
cairo-dock-freeworld
caja-dropbox
Cg
chromaprint-tools
clipgrab
d1x
dega-sdl
desmume
dgen-sdl
dhewm3
dosemu
dvbcut
dvd95
dvdrip
e-uae
exfat-utils
faac
faad2
fakenes
fceux
ffmpegthumbnailer
ffmpegthumbs
foo2zjs
Frodo
frogatto
fuse-exfat
gambatte
gcube
gecko-mediaplayer
gens
gens-gs
gltron
gmameui
gmtk
gnome-mplayer
gnuboy
gstreamer-ffmpeg
gstreamer-plugins-bad
gstreamer-plugins-bad-nonfree
gsview
gtetrinet
guvcview
gxine
imagination
jad
k3b-extras-freeworld
k9copy
kaffeine
kdenlive
kffmpegthumbnailer
kmediafactory
kplayer
kwave
lha
libaacs
libbdplus
libcapsimage
libdca
libfame
libmimic
libmms
libmpeg2
libmpeg3
libopenshot
libopenshot-audio
libshairport
libspotify
libtunepimp-extras-freeworld
libtxc_dxtn
lpf-flash-plugin
lpf-skype
ltris
lxdream
lxdvdrip
m2vmp2cut
m2vrequantiser
mac
madplay
mamory
mate-applet-streamer
mednafen
megamario
meka
minidlna
minitube
mixxx
mjpegtools
mlt
mmsrip
mod_h264_streaming
motion
mp3gain
mpd
mpgtx
nailer
nautilus-dropbox
ndiswrapper
ndiswrapper-kmod
nemo-dropbox
Nestopia
netfabb-basic
normalize
npapi-vlc
ogmrip
openclonk
opencore-amr
OpenEXR_Viewers-nonfree
openni-nite
osmose
oxine
pcsx2
pcsxr
pdflib-lite
perl-Crypt-IDEA
perl-PGPLOT
pgadmin3
pgplot
phonon-backend-vlc
php-pecl-pdflib
pipelight
plus4emu
proas
ProjectX
pushover
pxsup2dast
qmmp-plugins-freeworld
r5u87x-firmware
roadfighter
rtmpdump
scottfree
SheepShaver
smc
smplayer
snes9x
sonic-visualiser-freeworld
sox-plugins-freeworld
sox-plugins-nonfree
staging-kmod
steam
stella
streamripper
subtitleripper
swftools
tarsnap
terminatorX
tivodecode
torrentzip
transcode
traverso
twolame
unace
unrar
vagalume
vbam
vcdimager
vdr-burn
vdr-markad
vdr-mp3
vdr-skindesigner
vdr-softhddevice
vice
vo-amrwbenc
vobcopy
vokoscreen
wl-kmod
wolf4sdl
wormsofprey
xbill
xcpc
xine-lib
xine-plugin
xine-ui
xmms2-freeworld
xmms2-nonfree
xmms-mp3
xmms-mplayer
xmris
xpra-codecs-freeworld
xrick
xroar
xsnow