Re: itemized option (-ii) with --log-file and --log-file format
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 07:41:12AM +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: No, I also want to log files that are not transferred. You can use -vv instead of -ii to get a list of uptodate items, but no mention of attribute changes (non-transferred files are all uptodate). In rsync 3.1.0dev you can get that info without all the rest of the verbosity items it implies by specifying --info=name2. If that is not what you want, then you need the %i field so that rsync can output what has changed (or not changed) for the current item. ..wayne.. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: itemized option (-ii) with --log-file and --log-file format
David, How could I use sed in rsync -av --stats -ii --log-file-format='CONTENTS: %i %f %l %o %b' --log-file='/tmp/rsync-test' src/ dest/ command. For that, i think I have to redirect output to stdout using --out-format an needs to read it. but I want to redirect the desire output directly to the file. Thanks. On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:24 PM, David Overton da...@overtons.id.au wrote: Pipe the output through sed? 2009/4/6 Jignesh Shah jignesh.shah1...@gmail.com: Thanks Wayne for reply. I want to use log-file support only so that i need not to read stdout and put output into the file. I have to use -ii so that it print all the statistic info about what files/dirs synched and what are not. Please refer below output: with -i only. --- 2009/04/06 10:38:41 [27475] building file list 2009/04/06 10:38:41 [27475] sent 88 bytes received 12 bytes 200.00 bytes/sec 2009/04/06 10:38:41 [27475] total size is 1003012 speedup is 10030.12 with -ii - 2009/03/31 15:15:17 [4537] building file list 2009/03/31 15:15:29 [4537] created directory Mydocs1 2009/03/31 15:15:29 [4537] CONTENTS: cd+ Mydocs/. 4096 send 0 2009/03/31 15:15:29 [4537] CONTENTS: f+ Mydocs/1.pl 394 send 437 2009/03/31 15:15:29 [4537] CONTENTS: f+ Mydocs/CHANGELOG.txt 2588 send 2631 . . I want the output of -ii but dont want cryptic output in it (e.g. cd+ , f+ etc). If we remove it then it will become similar output as 2.6.* version output. Is it possible? Thanks, Jignesh On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Wayne Davison way...@samba.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:50:13AM +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: I noticed that the output format for this command is different from rsync V2.6.* . Is there any way I can make this output similar to rsync V2.6.*? What difference are you referring to? The use of send instead of recv for a local transfer? That is a more accurate representation of what rsync is doing, but you can change it by forcing rsync to pull files from localhost. See the support/lsh script for a way to pull from localhost w/o using a remote shell. If that's not the issue, please elaborate. ..wayne.. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.htmlhttp://www.catb.org/%7Eesr/faqs/smart-questions.html -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: itemized option (-ii) with --log-file and --log-file format
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 10:45:42AM +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: I have to use -ii so that it print all the statistic info about what files/dirs synched and what are not. No, -ii will include unchanged files in the logs in addition to changed files, and thus a %i field (the one with the cryptic characters) is needed to distinguish the two. The -i option also tells rsync to log about files that have attribute changes (not just transferred files), and the %i field is necessary to be able to distinguish if a file just got tweaked or was transferred. If you just want to log transferred files, don't specify -i at all, and use your prior --log-file=FILE and --log-file-format=FORMAT options, but leave out the %i parameter in the latter. ..wayne.. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: itemized option (-ii) with --log-file and --log-file format
If you just want to log transferred files, No, I also want to log files that are not transferred. Thanks, Jignesh On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Wayne Davison way...@samba.org wrote: On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 10:45:42AM +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: I have to use -ii so that it print all the statistic info about what files/dirs synched and what are not. No, -ii will include unchanged files in the logs in addition to changed files, and thus a %i field (the one with the cryptic characters) is needed to distinguish the two. The -i option also tells rsync to log about files that have attribute changes (not just transferred files), and the %i field is necessary to be able to distinguish if a file just got tweaked or was transferred. If you just want to log transferred files, don't specify -i at all, and use your prior --log-file=FILE and --log-file-format=FORMAT options, but leave out the %i parameter in the latter. ..wayne.. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: itemized option (-ii) with --log-file and --log-file format
Pipe the output through sed? 2009/4/6 Jignesh Shah jignesh.shah1...@gmail.com: Thanks Wayne for reply. I want to use log-file support only so that i need not to read stdout and put output into the file. I have to use -ii so that it print all the statistic info about what files/dirs synched and what are not. Please refer below output: with -i only. --- 2009/04/06 10:38:41 [27475] building file list 2009/04/06 10:38:41 [27475] sent 88 bytes received 12 bytes 200.00 bytes/sec 2009/04/06 10:38:41 [27475] total size is 1003012 speedup is 10030.12 with -ii - 2009/03/31 15:15:17 [4537] building file list 2009/03/31 15:15:29 [4537] created directory Mydocs1 2009/03/31 15:15:29 [4537] CONTENTS: cd+ Mydocs/. 4096 send 0 2009/03/31 15:15:29 [4537] CONTENTS: f+ Mydocs/1.pl 394 send 437 2009/03/31 15:15:29 [4537] CONTENTS: f+ Mydocs/CHANGELOG.txt 2588 send 2631 . . I want the output of -ii but dont want cryptic output in it (e.g. cd+ , f+ etc). If we remove it then it will become similar output as 2.6.* version output. Is it possible? Thanks, Jignesh On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Wayne Davison way...@samba.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:50:13AM +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: I noticed that the output format for this command is different from rsync V2.6.* . Is there any way I can make this output similar to rsync V2.6.*? What difference are you referring to? The use of send instead of recv for a local transfer? That is a more accurate representation of what rsync is doing, but you can change it by forcing rsync to pull files from localhost. See the support/lsh script for a way to pull from localhost w/o using a remote shell. If that's not the issue, please elaborate. ..wayne.. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: itemized option (-ii) with --log-file and --log-file format
Thanks Wayne for reply. I want to use log-file support only so that i need not to read stdout and put output into the file. I have to use -ii so that it print all the statistic info about what files/dirs synched and what are not. Please refer below output: with -i only. --- 2009/04/06 10:38:41 [27475] building file list 2009/04/06 10:38:41 [27475] sent 88 bytes received 12 bytes 200.00 bytes/sec 2009/04/06 10:38:41 [27475] total size is 1003012 speedup is 10030.12 with -ii - 2009/03/31 15:15:17 [4537] building file list 2009/03/31 15:15:29 [4537] created directory Mydocs1 2009/03/31 15:15:29 [4537] CONTENTS: cd+ Mydocs/. 4096 send 0 2009/03/31 15:15:29 [4537] CONTENTS: f+ Mydocs/1.pl 394 send 437 2009/03/31 15:15:29 [4537] CONTENTS: f+ Mydocs/CHANGELOG.txt 2588 send 2631 . . I want the output of -ii but dont want cryptic output in it (e.g. cd+ , f+ etc). If we remove it then it will become similar output as 2.6.* version output. Is it possible? Thanks, Jignesh On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Wayne Davison way...@samba.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:50:13AM +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: I noticed that the output format for this command is different from rsync V2.6.* . Is there any way I can make this output similar to rsync V2.6.*? What difference are you referring to? The use of send instead of recv for a local transfer? That is a more accurate representation of what rsync is doing, but you can change it by forcing rsync to pull files from localhost. See the support/lsh script for a way to pull from localhost w/o using a remote shell. If that's not the issue, please elaborate. ..wayne.. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: itemized option (-ii) with --log-file and --log-file format
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:50:13AM +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: I noticed that the output format for this command is different from rsync V2.6.* . Is there any way I can make this output similar to rsync V2.6.*? What difference are you referring to? The use of send instead of recv for a local transfer? That is a more accurate representation of what rsync is doing, but you can change it by forcing rsync to pull files from localhost. See the support/lsh script for a way to pull from localhost w/o using a remote shell. If that's not the issue, please elaborate. ..wayne.. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
itemized option (-ii) with --log-file and --log-file format
Hi, I am using rsync3.0.5 both side. I have been using below rsync command to get the sync info. rsync -av --stats -ii --log-file-format='CONTENTS: %i %f %l %o %b' --log-file='/tmp/rsync-test' src/ dest/ I noticed that the output format for this command is different from rsync V2.6.* . Is there any way I can make this output similar to rsync V2.6.*? Thanks, Jignesh -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
