Re: [rt-users] Which module or addon is responsible for the relation Diagram
Thanks Thomas now it works ... :)... best regards john s. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Which-module-or-addon-is-responsible-for-the-relation-Diagram-tp32242241p32317123.html Sent from the Request Tracker - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Chicago, IL, USA September 26 27, 2011 * San Francisco, CA, USA October 18 19, 2011 * Washington DC, USA October 31 November 1, 2011 * Melbourne VIC, Australia November 28 29, 2011 * Barcelona, Spain November 28 29, 2011
Re: [rt-users] Help with Scrip to move a ticket into a new queue
You need 'return 1;' in preparation code. Regards, Ruslan. From phone. 23.08.2011 3:16 пользователь Gilbert Rebeiro gilb...@dido.ca написал: Hi, I a queue called fr There is a simple autoreply that is bound to this queue. Scrip is setup: Condition: OnCreate Action: User defined Template: Autoreply Stage: TransactionCreate Custom condition: return 1; Custom action preparation code: Custom action cleanup code: # Change queue my $newqueue = 1.General; my $T_Obj = $self-TicketObj; $RT::Logger-info(Auto assign ticket #. $T_Obj-id . to queue #. $newqueue ); my ($status, $msg) = $T_Obj-SetQueue($newqueue); unless ($status) { $RT::Logger-warning(unable to set new queue: $msg); return undef; } return 1; It is not a typo 1.General it is the proper name of the queue that I want new tickets to be moved to. Not sure what I am doing wrong but it doesn't work. Can anyone tell me how to debug this? Trace this? What am I doing wrong? Thanks, Gilbert. RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Chicago, IL, USA September 26 27, 2011 * San Francisco, CA, USA October 18 19, 2011 * Washington DC, USA October 31 November 1, 2011 * Melbourne VIC, Australia November 28 29, 2011 * Barcelona, Spain November 28 29, 2011 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Chicago, IL, USA September 26 27, 2011 * San Francisco, CA, USA October 18 19, 2011 * Washington DC, USA October 31 November 1, 2011 * Melbourne VIC, Australia November 28 29, 2011 * Barcelona, Spain November 28 29, 2011
Re: [rt-users] Customize Ticket History
I don't think we have any plans to implement anything like this. It just doesn't feel right. Regards, Ruslan. From phone. 16.08.2011 15:14 пользователь john s. firesk...@gmx.de написал: @Ruslan: is for future releases for RT sth planned that is possible to filter the history in a more customize way? best regards john s. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Customize-Ticket--History-tp32167894p32270477.html Sent from the Request Tracker - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Chicago, IL, USA September 26 27, 2011 * San Francisco, CA, USA October 18 19, 2011 * Washington DC, USA October 31 November 1, 2011 * Melbourne VIC, Australia November 28 29, 2011 * Barcelona, Spain November 28 29, 2011 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Chicago, IL, USA September 26 27, 2011 * San Francisco, CA, USA October 18 19, 2011 * Washington DC, USA October 31 November 1, 2011 * Melbourne VIC, Australia November 28 29, 2011 * Barcelona, Spain November 28 29, 2011
Re: [rt-users] Workflow for comments or changing CC to BCC
Hi Thomas, thank you for reply. I will fix that misconfiguration. See inline text: On 16.08.2011 18:13, Thomas Sibley wrote: On 08/16/2011 11:38 AM, Lars Reimann wrote: I assume comments are for internal messages only. But how is this realized? We for example have the same mail address for reply and comment. Having the same email address for reply and comments is wrong and a misconfiguration. It means email replies to mailed out comments will be interpreted as correspondence, not private comments. I'd like to change normal CC actions to BCC. Why? Because we have watcher groups for external and internal people. Both are member of administrative cc (BCC) at the moment. But the external people should _not_ receive (internal) comments and also do not want to be added as CC either (only BCC is acceptable for them and us). Maybe there is a better way to do this. If you know one, please share it. Thanks a lot, LR RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Chicago, IL, USA September 26 27, 2011 * San Francisco, CA, USA October 18 19, 2011 * Washington DC, USA October 31 November 1, 2011 * Melbourne VIC, Australia November 28 29, 2011 * Barcelona, Spain November 28 29, 2011
Re: [rt-users] Workflow for comments or changing CC to BCC
On 08/23/2011 09:52 AM, Lars Reimann wrote: Because we have watcher groups for external and internal people. Both are member of administrative cc (BCC) at the moment. But the external people should _not_ receive (internal) comments and also do not want to be added as CC either (only BCC is acceptable for them and us). AdminCc is not just another name for Bcc. It is treated differently than Cc by a stock RT. This is the reason your external AdminCc watchers are receiving internal comments, because out of the box RT's scrips send comments to AdminCcs, but not Ccs. Changing Ticket/Queue Ccs to actually be Bcced would be a bit of work, or might be possible with some really clever templates. Thomas RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Chicago, IL, USA September 26 27, 2011 * San Francisco, CA, USA October 18 19, 2011 * Washington DC, USA October 31 November 1, 2011 * Melbourne VIC, Australia November 28 29, 2011 * Barcelona, Spain November 28 29, 2011
Re: [rt-users] Add AdminCC from custom field
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 03:45:20PM -0700, jessepdx wrote: i have a custom field named Location that contains an email address once it's extracted from the ticket how would i make a scrip adds that custom field's content as an AdminCC on the ticket You'll want to read about the AddWatcher method on a Ticket -kevin pgpBWHDJtH0f7.pgp Description: PGP signature RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Chicago, IL, USA September 26 27, 2011 * San Francisco, CA, USA October 18 19, 2011 * Washington DC, USA October 31 November 1, 2011 * Melbourne VIC, Australia November 28 29, 2011 * Barcelona, Spain November 28 29, 2011
Re: [rt-users] Help with Scrip to move a ticket into a new queue
Gilbert, You might also want to remove the return 1; in the custom Condition code since you have already set the condition as OnCreate. It isn't needed. I don't know if it messes anything up, but I wouldn't leave anything in a coded area that isn't needed. Hope this helps. Kenn LBNL On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Ruslan Zakirov r...@bestpractical.comwrote: You need 'return 1;' in preparation code. Regards, Ruslan. From phone. 23.08.2011 3:16 пользователь Gilbert Rebeiro gilb...@dido.ca написал: Hi, I a queue called fr There is a simple autoreply that is bound to this queue. Scrip is setup: Condition: OnCreate Action: User defined Template: Autoreply Stage: TransactionCreate Custom condition: return 1; Custom action preparation code: Custom action cleanup code: # Change queue my $newqueue = 1.General; my $T_Obj = $self-TicketObj; $RT::Logger-info(Auto assign ticket #. $T_Obj-id . to queue #. $newqueue ); my ($status, $msg) = $T_Obj-SetQueue($newqueue); unless ($status) { $RT::Logger-warning(unable to set new queue: $msg); return undef; } return 1; It is not a typo 1.General it is the proper name of the queue that I want new tickets to be moved to. Not sure what I am doing wrong but it doesn't work. Can anyone tell me how to debug this? Trace this? What am I doing wrong? Thanks, Gilbert. RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Chicago, IL, USA September 26 27, 2011 * San Francisco, CA, USA October 18 19, 2011 * Washington DC, USA October 31 November 1, 2011 * Melbourne VIC, Australia November 28 29, 2011 * Barcelona, Spain November 28 29, 2011 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Chicago, IL, USA -- September 26 27, 2011 * San Francisco, CA, USA -- October 18 19, 2011 * Washington DC, USA -- October 31 November 1, 2011 * Melbourne VIC, Australia -- November 28 29, 2011 * Barcelona, Spain -- November 28 29, 2011 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Chicago, IL, USA September 26 27, 2011 * San Francisco, CA, USA October 18 19, 2011 * Washington DC, USA October 31 November 1, 2011 * Melbourne VIC, Australia November 28 29, 2011 * Barcelona, Spain November 28 29, 2011
Re: [rt-users] Which module or addon is responsible for the relation Diagram
Hi, Configure tarball on production with --with-graphviz option and run make testdeps. Regards, Ruslan. From phone. 11.08.2011 17:49 пользователь john s. firesk...@gmx.de написал: Hello everybody i have a problem currently we have to rt systems running an prod system and a test one. at the test system, i can click on the diagram relations from tickets if the ticket has an parent or an child in the prod system the feature doesn't appear in the relations section so i tried to analyze the responsible thing for it but i can't find it is this a core feature from RT and maybe my settings aren't correct? or is it a addon or perl module version which is responsible for this feature ? best regards john s. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Which-module-or-addon-is-responsible-for-the-relation-Diagram-tp32242241p32242241.html Sent from the Request Tracker - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Chicago, IL, USA September 26 27, 2011 * San Francisco, CA, USA October 18 19, 2011 * Washington DC, USA October 31 November 1, 2011 * Melbourne VIC, Australia November 28 29, 2011 * Barcelona, Spain November 28 29, 2011 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Chicago, IL, USA September 26 27, 2011 * San Francisco, CA, USA October 18 19, 2011 * Washington DC, USA October 31 November 1, 2011 * Melbourne VIC, Australia November 28 29, 2011 * Barcelona, Spain November 28 29, 2011
[rt-users] rt-client ruby gem 0.4.0
I just pushed version 0.4.0 as a bug fix for 0.3.9 * fixed usersearch method to actually work ^^ * documented usersearch method and added it to the rtxmlsrv.rb XML-RPC service -- Tom Lahti, SCMDBA, LPIC-1, CLA BIT LLC 425-251-0833 x 117 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Chicago, IL, USA September 26 27, 2011 * San Francisco, CA, USA October 18 19, 2011 * Washington DC, USA October 31 November 1, 2011 * Melbourne VIC, Australia November 28 29, 2011 * Barcelona, Spain November 28 29, 2011
Re: [rt-users] Help with Scrip to move a ticket into a new queue
Excellent,, , it worked. Many thanks to all that helped. On 23/08/2011 11:14 AM, Kenneth Crocker wrote: Gilbert, You might also want to remove the return 1; in the custom Condition code since you have already set the condition as OnCreate. It isn't needed. I don't know if it messes anything up, but I wouldn't leave anything in a coded area that isn't needed. Hope this helps. Kenn LBNL On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Ruslan Zakirov r...@bestpractical.com mailto:r...@bestpractical.com wrote: You need 'return 1;' in preparation code. Regards, Ruslan. From phone. 23.08.2011 3:16 Gilbert Rebeiro gilb...@dido.ca mailto:gilb...@dido.ca ???: Hi, I a queue called fr There is a simple autoreply that is bound to this queue. Scrip is setup: Condition: OnCreate Action: User defined Template: Autoreply Stage: TransactionCreate Custom condition: return 1; Custom action preparation code: Custom action cleanup code: # Change queue my $newqueue = 1.General; my $T_Obj = $self-TicketObj; $RT::Logger-info(Auto assign ticket #. $T_Obj-id . to queue #. $newqueue ); my ($status, $msg) = $T_Obj-SetQueue($newqueue); unless ($status) { $RT::Logger-warning(unable to set new queue: $msg); return undef; } return 1; It is not a typo 1.General it is the proper name of the queue that I want new tickets to be moved to. Not sure what I am doing wrong but it doesn't work. Can anyone tell me how to debug this? Trace this? What am I doing wrong? Thanks, Gilbert. RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Chicago, IL, USA September 26 27, 2011 * San Francisco, CA, USA October 18 19, 2011 * Washington DC, USA October 31 November 1, 2011 * Melbourne VIC, Australia November 28 29, 2011 * Barcelona, Spain November 28 29, 2011 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Chicago, IL, USA --- September 26 27, 2011 * San Francisco, CA, USA --- October 18 19, 2011 * Washington DC, USA --- October 31 November 1, 2011 * Melbourne VIC, Australia --- November 28 29, 2011 * Barcelona, Spain --- November 28 29, 2011 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Chicago, IL, USA --- September 26 27, 2011 * San Francisco, CA, USA --- October 18 19, 2011 * Washington DC, USA --- October 31 November 1, 2011 * Melbourne VIC, Australia --- November 28 29, 2011 * Barcelona, Spain --- November 28 29, 2011 RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Chicago, IL, USA September 26 27, 2011 * San Francisco, CA, USA October 18 19, 2011 * Washington DC, USA October 31 November 1, 2011 * Melbourne VIC, Australia November 28 29, 2011 * Barcelona, Spain November 28 29, 2011
[rt-users] Rt 4.0.1 Time Report
Hello Folks,I am still a very new RT user, but I am now making progress.I need to generate reports on time so that we can manage billing to customers. Thereport that I need is a total time worked per queue with a breakdown of time worked per ticket.I have seen two tools that may help at this URL: http://requesttracker.wikia.com/wiki/Contributions TimeWorked - Display a report with total time worked per queue/per user TimeWorkedReport - Display a report with total time worked per user per ticket for one or more queues. These appear to only work with RT 3.6 - 3.8 and not 4.Can anybody confirm that these work with RT 4 and or propose another solution?Thank you very much.Alex-- Alex Rhys-Hurn | ITworX LimitedP.O. Box 1649, 00502, Karen, KenyaTel: +254 (0) 20 2444824 | Cell: +254 (0) 724 972541Web: www.itworx.co.ke This e-mail contains confidential information or information belonging to ITworX Limited and is intended solely for the addressees. The opinions therein, explicit or implied, are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ITworX Limited as a company. The unauthorized disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either Whole or partial) of this e-mail, or any information it contains, is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration and their integrity cannot be guaranteed. ITworX Limited shall not be liable for this e-mail if modified or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender of the wrong delivery and the e-mail deletion. RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html) * Chicago, IL, USA September 26 27, 2011 * San Francisco, CA, USA October 18 19, 2011 * Washington DC, USA October 31 November 1, 2011 * Melbourne VIC, Australia November 28 29, 2011 * Barcelona, Spain November 28 29, 2011