[Rails] Re: when migrating add_index error: invalid date
Replace mysql2 gem with mysql (at least for development mode under windows). Solved here : https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-talk/a-wyECimZ5g/1F0sgAcje0cJ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Hbar color - openflash chart
Hi, am using Openflashchart plugin,How can we change the color of each bar in Hbar openflash chart this is the code i have inside my controller def stat_bar title = Title.new(session[:tag]) hbar = HBar.new hbar.values = [HBarValue.new(0,10),HBarValue.new(0,20)] hbar.colour = '#FF8000' # this works for the two bars chart = OpenFlashChart.new chart.set_title(title) chart.add_element(hbar) x = XAxis.new x.set_offset(false) chart.set_x_axis(x) y = YAxis.new y.set_offset(true) y.set_labels([Yes,No]) chart.set_y_axis(y) render :text = chart.to_s end Please help !! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Weird form behavior
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Tim Uckun timuc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Jim Ruther Nill jvn...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure but if you look at
http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/NestedAttributes/ClassMethods.html
your params does not have the same format as the one stated in the link. It
should be
contact_methods_attributes=[{details=test, id=1,
_destroy=false}]
The problem turned out to be attr_accessible You have to put
contact_methods_attributes in there and not contact_methods.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Like gsub but the parameter is matchdata
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Ralph Shnelvar li...@ruby-forum.comwrote: Check this out. http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/String.html#M001186 I must be blind. I see no MatchData anywhere. I see *match* which is a string ... but no MatchData. What exactly do you mean when you say MatchData and not a string. Can you show a dummy example of what do you want to achieve. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Get request by session id?
Hello, i've stored my sessions in a session table and can acces them via: Session.all (id, session_id, data, c_at, u_at) also i can get my current session_id via: request.session_options[:id] Is there a possibility to find all request containing to every single session - to get an overview beyond the env of every session. Something like: Request.find_by_session_id(session_id).env Thanks for your answers 'till now. Hans -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Get request by session id?
On Feb 11, 10:55 am, Hans Hartmann li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Hello, i've stored my sessions in a session table and can acces them via: Session.all (id, session_id, data, c_at, u_at) also i can get my current session_id via: request.session_options[:id] Is there a possibility to find all request containing to every single session - to get an overview beyond the env of every session. Something like: Request.find_by_session_id(session_id).env I'm not sure what you're after - requests aren't persisted anywhere (unless you're doing something special to do that) Fred Thanks for your answers 'till now. Hans -- Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Get request by session id?
I'm not sure what you're after - requests aren't persisted anywhere (unless you're doing something special to do that) I want to find a possibility to get the PATH_INFO of each session user. My first opinion to do that was to list the env of all sessions. The reason I want to do that is to forbid, that two session users can access an update form on the same time. I have to check on which site all session users currently are. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Weird form behavior
oh right! we forgot about that one when we were discussing it minutes ago.
:D at least you figured it out.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Tim Uckun timuc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Tim Uckun timuc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Jim Ruther Nill jvn...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not sure but if you look at
http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/NestedAttributes/ClassMethods.html
your params does not have the same format as the one stated in the link.
It
should be
contact_methods_attributes=[{details=test, id=1,
_destroy=false}]
The problem turned out to be attr_accessible You have to put
contact_methods_attributes in there and not contact_methods.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Ruby on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
--
-
visit my blog at http://jimlabs.heroku.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Like gsub but the parameter is matchdata
i think what he meant was like the scan function for string but instead of returning String objects, you get MatchData objects. On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Jatin kumar jatinkumar.n...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Ralph Shnelvar li...@ruby-forum.comwrote: Check this out. http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/String.html#M001186 I must be blind. I see no MatchData anywhere. I see *match* which is a string ... but no MatchData. What exactly do you mean when you say MatchData and not a string. Can you show a dummy example of what do you want to achieve. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. -- - visit my blog at http://jimlabs.heroku.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Map integration with showing places within the particular radius
And the geokit-rails3 gem which adds basic finders by distance. It's not a completely functional port of the old geokit-rails because of all the changes in Rails3, but the basic distance finders work just fine. https://github.com/jlecour/geokit-rails3 Best Wishes, Peter On Feb 11, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Jim Ruther Nill wrote: look at http://geokit.rubyforge.org/ On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Tushar Gandhi li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Hi, I have to do the map integration in my upcoming project. Also, in the map I have to show the places which are nearer to that place within the 10 miles. Is anyone have any idea how to do this? Thanks, Tushar -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. -- - visit my blog at http://jimlabs.heroku.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Problems installing exception_notification plugin
Hi, I am, trying to install the exception_notification plugin for rails. I am using rails 2.3, and Windows 7 (64 bit) The Rails 3 version is here: https://github.com/rails/exception_notification/ I can install it using git-bash thus: ruby script/install plugin git://github.com/rails/exception_notification/ This works fine. However, I am trying to install the version of the plugin which is compatible with Rails 2.3 It is here: https://github.com/rails/exception_notification/tree/2-3-stable/ However, when I try the following in git-bash: ruby script/install plugin git://github.com/rails/exception_notification/tree/2-3-stable/ I get the error: fatal: remote error: rails/exception_notification/tree/2-3-stable/ is not a valid repository name. Any ideas how I can install the 2.3 branch of this plugin? Thanks in advance. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Form check boxes and Forms
Bit of a newbie question but I've got a form and I want bits of the form to appear when a checkbox is clicked. So for example I have a query such as do you want to have a link attached to this post which is a tick box, then I have another field which contains the text box for the link to go in. So I want the link text box to appear when the checkbox is clicked. Can anyone help? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] accept_nested_attributes, reject_if doesn't work.
class Post ActiveRecord::Base
validates :name, :presence = true
validates :title, :presence = true,
:length = { :minimum = 5 }
has_many :comments, :dependent = :destroy
has_many :tags
accepts_nested_attributes_for :tags, :allow_destroy = :true,
:reject_if = proc { |attrs| attrs.all? { |k, v| v.blank? or v.nil? } }
end
rails c
irb(main):001:0 post=Post.first
= #Post id: 1, name: prova, title: titolo prova, content: prova
1, created_at: 2011-02-01 10:03:10, updated_at: 2011-02-01
10:03:10
irb(main):002:0 post.tags.create()
= #Tag id: 5, name: nil, post_id: 1, created_at: 2011-02-11
13:19:22, updated_at: 2011-02-11 13:19:22
irb(main):003:0
irb(main):003:0 post.valid?
= true
Tags has blank or nil attributes but it is saved.
Why I have put :reject_if = proc { |attrs| attrs.all? { |k, v|
v.blank? or v.nil? } } for tags?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Get request by session id?
On Feb 11, 11:12 am, Hans Hartmann li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: I'm not sure what you're after - requests aren't persisted anywhere (unless you're doing something special to do that) I want to find a possibility to get the PATH_INFO of each session user. My first opinion to do that was to list the env of all sessions. The reason I want to do that is to forbid, that two session users can access an update form on the same time. I don't think there's anyway of doing this without you storing details of all requests (is there even a thing as 'the' PATH_INFO? A user could have multiple windows) I think you're approaching this wrong way. I would tackle this by having a flag saying that a record is being used/edited by someone else. Fred I have to check on which site all session users currently are. -- Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] accept_nested_attributes, reject_if doesn't work.
Looking at
http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/NestedAttributes/ClassMethods.html
http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/NestedAttributes/ClassMethods.htmlI
think accepts_nested_attributes expects an #{association}_attributes
key/value pair to be passed
as an attribute to the parent object, in this case Post.
doing post.tags.create doesn't pass by accepts_nested_attributes_for but the
normal Tag.create.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Mauro mrsan...@gmail.com wrote:
class Post ActiveRecord::Base
validates :name, :presence = true
validates :title, :presence = true,
:length = { :minimum = 5 }
has_many :comments, :dependent = :destroy
has_many :tags
accepts_nested_attributes_for :tags, :allow_destroy = :true,
:reject_if = proc { |attrs| attrs.all? { |k, v| v.blank? or v.nil? } }
end
rails c
irb(main):001:0 post=Post.first
= #Post id: 1, name: prova, title: titolo prova, content: prova
1, created_at: 2011-02-01 10:03:10, updated_at: 2011-02-01
10:03:10
irb(main):002:0 post.tags.create()
= #Tag id: 5, name: nil, post_id: 1, created_at: 2011-02-11
13:19:22, updated_at: 2011-02-11 13:19:22
irb(main):003:0
irb(main):003:0 post.valid?
= true
Tags has blank or nil attributes but it is saved.
Why I have put :reject_if = proc { |attrs| attrs.all? { |k, v|
v.blank? or v.nil? } } for tags?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Ruby on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
--
-
visit my blog at http://jimlabs.heroku.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] default values and text_field
I have a model and I set defaults for some values by overriding the read accessor. For example def heading read_attribute(:heading).nil? ? 'Please select from:' : read_attribute(:heading) end The problem I have found is that text_field ignores this. %= f.text_field :heading % is empty even when heading is nil now I can easily add :value and it works %= f.text_field :heading, :value = @site.heading % but it seems like this shouldn't be necessary. I also override read accessors for values that I use in select statements on the same form and it works fine. def text_color read_attribute(:text_color).nil? ? SiteColors::TEXT_DEFAULT : read_attribute(:text_color) end %= f.select :text_color, SiteColors::COLORS% This picks up the default fine Is this a bug in text_field or am I just doing something stupid? Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Rails Bad Practice Survey
Hi, As part of a project I've compiled a VERY short survey on common bad practices encountered when developing Rails applications. The survey comtains a number of bad practices (smells) detected in a sample application. I'm looking for as many Rails developers as possible to scan through the proposed smells and state whether they aggree/diagree that these are in fact smells and hence bad practice. The survey will literally take only 5 to 10 minutes. If anyone is interested send me a message via the 'Forum Mail' and I'll reply with the survey. Or post a reply in this thread and i'll arrange a way of getting the survey to you. Thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: default values and text_field
On Feb 11, 1:37 pm, Tony Primerano tony.primer...@gmail.com wrote: I have a model and I set defaults for some values by overriding the read accessor. For example def heading read_attribute(:heading).nil? ? 'Please select from:' : read_attribute(:heading) end Have you double checked this works by calling heading directly on the object in question? Fred The problem I have found is that text_field ignores this. %= f.text_field :heading % is empty even when heading is nil now I can easily add :value and it works %= f.text_field :heading, :value = @site.heading % but it seems like this shouldn't be necessary. I also override read accessors for values that I use in select statements on the same form and it works fine. def text_color read_attribute(:text_color).nil? ? SiteColors::TEXT_DEFAULT : read_attribute(:text_color) end %= f.select :text_color, SiteColors::COLORS% This picks up the default fine Is this a bug in text_field or am I just doing something stupid? Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] SQL Queries in Rails Console a href=sdf/aobject/object
ActiveRecord::Base.logger = Logger.new(STDOUT) -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/SQL-Queries-in-Rails-Console-%3Ca-href%3D%22sdf%22%3E%3C-a%3E%3Cobject%3E%3C-object%3E-tp30901356p30901356.html Sent from the RubyOnRails Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: default values and text_field
On Feb 11, 8:45 am, Frederick Cheung frederick.che...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 11, 1:37 pm, Tony Primerano tony.primer...@gmail.com wrote: I have a model and I set defaults for some values by overriding the read accessor. For example def heading read_attribute(:heading).nil? ? 'Please select from:' : read_attribute(:heading) end Have you double checked this works by calling heading directly on the object in question? yes. This works %= f.text_field :heading, :value = @site.heading % and if I set it in the controller it works fine too. @site.heading = 'testing' Maybe text_field is using read_attribute instead of calling the method? Fred The problem I have found is that text_field ignores this. %= f.text_field :heading % is empty even when heading is nil now I can easily add :value and it works %= f.text_field :heading, :value = @site.heading % but it seems like this shouldn't be necessary. I also override read accessors for values that I use in select statements on the same form and it works fine. def text_color read_attribute(:text_color).nil? ? SiteColors::TEXT_DEFAULT : read_attribute(:text_color) end %= f.select :text_color, SiteColors::COLORS% This picks up the default fine Is this a bug in text_field or am I just doing something stupid? Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Gem to work with image attachement
Thanks. I gonna take a look on Ruby toolbox -- Abraços Sinceros e Agradecidos Andre Fonseca http://www.andrefonseca.net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Rails Bad Practice Survey
Send them this way :D On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Robert O'regan li...@ruby-forum.comwrote: Hi, As part of a project I've compiled a VERY short survey on common bad practices encountered when developing Rails applications. The survey comtains a number of bad practices (smells) detected in a sample application. I'm looking for as many Rails developers as possible to scan through the proposed smells and state whether they aggree/diagree that these are in fact smells and hence bad practice. The survey will literally take only 5 to 10 minutes. If anyone is interested send me a message via the 'Forum Mail' and I'll reply with the survey. Or post a reply in this thread and i'll arrange a way of getting the survey to you. Thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. -- - visit my blog at http://jimlabs.heroku.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: default values and text_field
are you sure that heading is nil? could you double check if it's not an empty string? On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Tony Primerano tony.primer...@gmail.comwrote: On Feb 11, 8:45 am, Frederick Cheung frederick.che...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 11, 1:37 pm, Tony Primerano tony.primer...@gmail.com wrote: I have a model and I set defaults for some values by overriding the read accessor. For example def heading read_attribute(:heading).nil? ? 'Please select from:' : read_attribute(:heading) end Have you double checked this works by calling heading directly on the object in question? yes. This works %= f.text_field :heading, :value = @site.heading % and if I set it in the controller it works fine too. @site.heading = 'testing' Maybe text_field is using read_attribute instead of calling the method? Fred The problem I have found is that text_field ignores this. %= f.text_field :heading % is empty even when heading is nil now I can easily add :value and it works %= f.text_field :heading, :value = @site.heading % but it seems like this shouldn't be necessary. I also override read accessors for values that I use in select statements on the same form and it works fine. def text_color read_attribute(:text_color).nil? ? SiteColors::TEXT_DEFAULT : read_attribute(:text_color) end %= f.select :text_color, SiteColors::COLORS% This picks up the default fine Is this a bug in text_field or am I just doing something stupid? Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. -- - visit my blog at http://jimlabs.heroku.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: rvm install 1.8.7 prompts There has been an error while running make. Halting the installation.
Frederick Cheung wrote in post #980922: Error running 'make ', please read /Users/jmerlino/.rvm/log/ruby-1.8.7-p330/make.log So, what was in it? Fred Towards bottom it says this: readline.c: In function ‘username_completion_proc_call’: readline.c:730: error: ‘username_completion_function’ undeclared (first use in this function) readline.c:730: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once readline.c:730: error: for each function it appears in.) make[1]: *** [readline.o] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 1 -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Delete routes to Edit?
Hi-
I encountered a problem I have never seen before. For some reason,
requests for Destroy are routing to Edit.
Here's the route:
DELETE /instructions/:id(.:format)
{:action=destroy, :controller=instructions}
Here's the call to render it:
%= link_to 'Delete', instruction, :confirm = 'Are you
sure?', :method = :delete %
This is all from the scaffolding created by Rails. Whenever that link
is clicked, it routes the user to the Edit page.
If I look at the logs, it looks like a GET request is made instead of
a Delete.
Has anyone seen this before?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: default values and text_field
The string is nil. I even created a new rails project to test this out. (Rails 3 / 1.9.2) rails generate scaffold test value1:string value2:integer app/models/test.rb class Test ActiveRecord::Base def value1 read_attribute(:value1).nil? ? 'hello' : read_attribute(:value1) end def value2 read_attribute(:value2).nil? ? 3 : read_attribute(:value2) end end app/views/tests/_form.html.erb %= form_for(@test) do |f| % value 1 is %= @test.value1.inspect % and value 2 is %= @test.value2.inspect % div class=field %= f.label :value1 %br / %= f.text_field :value1 % /div div class=field %= f.label :value2 %br / %= f.select :value2, (1..10) % /div div class=actions %= f.submit % /div % end % At the top of the form we see value 1 is hello and value 2 is 3 the select statement has 3 selected but the text field has nothing. Adding ':value = @test.value1' fixes the issue but shouldn't be necessary AFAIK %= f.text_field :value1, :value = @test.value1 % On Feb 11, 10:00 am, Jim Ruther Nill jvn...@gmail.com wrote: are you sure that heading is nil? could you double check if it's not an empty string? On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Tony Primerano tony.primer...@gmail.comwrote: On Feb 11, 8:45 am, Frederick Cheung frederick.che...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 11, 1:37 pm, Tony Primerano tony.primer...@gmail.com wrote: I have a model and I set defaults for some values by overriding the read accessor. For example def heading read_attribute(:heading).nil? ? 'Please select from:' : read_attribute(:heading) end Have you double checked this works by calling heading directly on the object in question? yes. This works %= f.text_field :heading, :value = @site.heading % and if I set it in the controller it works fine too. @site.heading = 'testing' Maybe text_field is using read_attribute instead of calling the method? Fred The problem I have found is that text_field ignores this. %= f.text_field :heading % is empty even when heading is nil now I can easily add :value and it works %= f.text_field :heading, :value = @site.heading % but it seems like this shouldn't be necessary. I also override read accessors for values that I use in select statements on the same form and it works fine. def text_color read_attribute(:text_color).nil? ? SiteColors::TEXT_DEFAULT : read_attribute(:text_color) end %= f.select :text_color, SiteColors::COLORS% This picks up the default fine Is this a bug in text_field or am I just doing something stupid? Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. -- - visit my blog athttp://jimlabs.heroku.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Delete routes to Edit?
are you using rails 3? this problem usually occur if you remove the
javascripts to be used to handle the :confirm argument and the csrf meta
tag.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:46 PM, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi-
I encountered a problem I have never seen before. For some reason,
requests for Destroy are routing to Edit.
Here's the route:
DELETE /instructions/:id(.:format)
{:action=destroy, :controller=instructions}
Here's the call to render it:
%= link_to 'Delete', instruction, :confirm = 'Are you
sure?', :method = :delete %
This is all from the scaffolding created by Rails. Whenever that link
is clicked, it routes the user to the Edit page.
If I look at the logs, it looks like a GET request is made instead of
a Delete.
Has anyone seen this before?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Ruby on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
--
-
visit my blog at http://jimlabs.heroku.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Delete routes to Edit?
Yes, and I did remove the CSRF meta tag.
Thanks, I'll look into it!
On Feb 11, 8:58 am, Jim Ruther Nill jvn...@gmail.com wrote:
are you using rails 3? this problem usually occur if you remove the
javascripts to be used to handle the :confirm argument and the csrf meta
tag.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:46 PM, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi-
I encountered a problem I have never seen before. For some reason,
requests for Destroy are routing to Edit.
Here's the route:
DELETE /instructions/:id(.:format)
{:action=destroy, :controller=instructions}
Here's the call to render it:
%= link_to 'Delete', instruction, :confirm = 'Are you
sure?', :method = :delete %
This is all from the scaffolding created by Rails. Whenever that link
is clicked, it routes the user to the Edit page.
If I look at the logs, it looks like a GET request is made instead of
a Delete.
Has anyone seen this before?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Ruby on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
--
-
visit my blog athttp://jimlabs.heroku.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Delete routes to Edit?
Hmm, I uncommented the CSRF meta tag, ensured I was including the
default javascripts and restarted, same issue.
I have added my own js files, is it likely a conflict with those?
On Feb 11, 9:01 am, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, and I did remove the CSRF meta tag.
Thanks, I'll look into it!
On Feb 11, 8:58 am, Jim Ruther Nill jvn...@gmail.com wrote:
are you using rails 3? this problem usually occur if you remove the
javascripts to be used to handle the :confirm argument and the csrf meta
tag.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:46 PM, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi-
I encountered a problem I have never seen before. For some reason,
requests for Destroy are routing to Edit.
Here's the route:
DELETE /instructions/:id(.:format)
{:action=destroy, :controller=instructions}
Here's the call to render it:
%= link_to 'Delete', instruction, :confirm = 'Are you
sure?', :method = :delete %
This is all from the scaffolding created by Rails. Whenever that link
is clicked, it routes the user to the Edit page.
If I look at the logs, it looks like a GET request is made instead of
a Delete.
Has anyone seen this before?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Ruby on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
--
-
visit my blog athttp://jimlabs.heroku.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Delete routes to Edit?
hmm, just to be sure, try removing the confirm argument and check if it goes
to the destroy action.
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:05 AM, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, I uncommented the CSRF meta tag, ensured I was including the
default javascripts and restarted, same issue.
I have added my own js files, is it likely a conflict with those?
On Feb 11, 9:01 am, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, and I did remove the CSRF meta tag.
Thanks, I'll look into it!
On Feb 11, 8:58 am, Jim Ruther Nill jvn...@gmail.com wrote:
are you using rails 3? this problem usually occur if you remove the
javascripts to be used to handle the :confirm argument and the csrf
meta
tag.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:46 PM, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi-
I encountered a problem I have never seen before. For some reason,
requests for Destroy are routing to Edit.
Here's the route:
DELETE /instructions/:id(.:format)
{:action=destroy, :controller=instructions}
Here's the call to render it:
%= link_to 'Delete', instruction, :confirm = 'Are you
sure?', :method = :delete %
This is all from the scaffolding created by Rails. Whenever that
link
is clicked, it routes the user to the Edit page.
If I look at the logs, it looks like a GET request is made instead of
a Delete.
Has anyone seen this before?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Ruby on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
--
-
visit my blog athttp://jimlabs.heroku.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Ruby on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
--
-
visit my blog at http://jimlabs.heroku.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: default values and text_field
Sorry, I can't help you out as I'm not on my dev box. One thing off the top of my mind (so you wont have to worry about that) is to use a placeholder attribute instead of doing that check. Good luck! http://davidwalsh.name/html5-placeholder On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Tony Primerano tony.primer...@gmail.comwrote: The string is nil. I even created a new rails project to test this out. (Rails 3 / 1.9.2) rails generate scaffold test value1:string value2:integer app/models/test.rb class Test ActiveRecord::Base def value1 read_attribute(:value1).nil? ? 'hello' : read_attribute(:value1) end def value2 read_attribute(:value2).nil? ? 3 : read_attribute(:value2) end end app/views/tests/_form.html.erb %= form_for(@test) do |f| % value 1 is %= @test.value1.inspect % and value 2 is %= @test.value2.inspect % div class=field %= f.label :value1 %br / %= f.text_field :value1 % /div div class=field %= f.label :value2 %br / %= f.select :value2, (1..10) % /div div class=actions %= f.submit % /div % end % At the top of the form we see value 1 is hello and value 2 is 3 the select statement has 3 selected but the text field has nothing. Adding ':value = @test.value1' fixes the issue but shouldn't be necessary AFAIK %= f.text_field :value1, :value = @test.value1 % On Feb 11, 10:00 am, Jim Ruther Nill jvn...@gmail.com wrote: are you sure that heading is nil? could you double check if it's not an empty string? On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Tony Primerano tony.primer...@gmail.comwrote: On Feb 11, 8:45 am, Frederick Cheung frederick.che...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 11, 1:37 pm, Tony Primerano tony.primer...@gmail.com wrote: I have a model and I set defaults for some values by overriding the read accessor. For example def heading read_attribute(:heading).nil? ? 'Please select from:' : read_attribute(:heading) end Have you double checked this works by calling heading directly on the object in question? yes. This works %= f.text_field :heading, :value = @site.heading % and if I set it in the controller it works fine too. @site.heading = 'testing' Maybe text_field is using read_attribute instead of calling the method? Fred The problem I have found is that text_field ignores this. %= f.text_field :heading % is empty even when heading is nil now I can easily add :value and it works %= f.text_field :heading, :value = @site.heading % but it seems like this shouldn't be necessary. I also override read accessors for values that I use in select statements on the same form and it works fine. def text_color read_attribute(:text_color).nil? ? SiteColors::TEXT_DEFAULT : read_attribute(:text_color) end %= f.select :text_color, SiteColors::COLORS% This picks up the default fine Is this a bug in text_field or am I just doing something stupid? Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com . To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. -- - visit my blog athttp://jimlabs.heroku.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. -- - visit my blog at http://jimlabs.heroku.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Delete routes to Edit?
Nope, I removed the confirm and it still goes to Edit.
On Feb 11, 9:10 am, Jim Ruther Nill jvn...@gmail.com wrote:
hmm, just to be sure, try removing the confirm argument and check if it goes
to the destroy action.
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:05 AM, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, I uncommented the CSRF meta tag, ensured I was including the
default javascripts and restarted, same issue.
I have added my own js files, is it likely a conflict with those?
On Feb 11, 9:01 am, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, and I did remove the CSRF meta tag.
Thanks, I'll look into it!
On Feb 11, 8:58 am, Jim Ruther Nill jvn...@gmail.com wrote:
are you using rails 3? this problem usually occur if you remove the
javascripts to be used to handle the :confirm argument and the csrf
meta
tag.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:46 PM, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi-
I encountered a problem I have never seen before. For some reason,
requests for Destroy are routing to Edit.
Here's the route:
DELETE /instructions/:id(.:format)
{:action=destroy, :controller=instructions}
Here's the call to render it:
%= link_to 'Delete', instruction, :confirm = 'Are you
sure?', :method = :delete %
This is all from the scaffolding created by Rails. Whenever that
link
is clicked, it routes the user to the Edit page.
If I look at the logs, it looks like a GET request is made instead of
a Delete.
Has anyone seen this before?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Ruby on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
--
-
visit my blog athttp://jimlabs.heroku.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Ruby on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
--
-
visit my blog athttp://jimlabs.heroku.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Own theme
Solved, I missed out a ; that;s it. Anyway thaks. On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Hassan Schroeder hassan.schroe...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Bhasker Harihara harihara.bhas...@gmail.com wrote: So inside my custom.css I use background-color: (url:--) This works just by itself but when I add other parts of the custom and header it does not work. Then this has nothing to with Rails -- you should post your question to a general HTML/CSS/web dev mailing list, after validating both markup and stylesheet(s). Though background-color (url:--) ?? that's just obviously wrong; look at the CSS docs for starters. Good luck, -- Hassan Schroeder hassan.schroe...@gmail.com twitter: @hassan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Delete routes to Edit?
btw, see if you can figure something out on this thread.
http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=41563
http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=41563good luck!
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Jim Ruther Nill jvn...@gmail.com wrote:
hmm. that's weird. i can't think of any cause atm.
what js framework are you using?
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:15 AM, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope, I removed the confirm and it still goes to Edit.
On Feb 11, 9:10 am, Jim Ruther Nill jvn...@gmail.com wrote:
hmm, just to be sure, try removing the confirm argument and check if it
goes
to the destroy action.
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:05 AM, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hmm, I uncommented the CSRF meta tag, ensured I was including the
default javascripts and restarted, same issue.
I have added my own js files, is it likely a conflict with those?
On Feb 11, 9:01 am, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, and I did remove the CSRF meta tag.
Thanks, I'll look into it!
On Feb 11, 8:58 am, Jim Ruther Nill jvn...@gmail.com wrote:
are you using rails 3? this problem usually occur if you remove
the
javascripts to be used to handle the :confirm argument and the
csrf
meta
tag.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:46 PM, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi-
I encountered a problem I have never seen before. For some
reason,
requests for Destroy are routing to Edit.
Here's the route:
DELETE /instructions/:id(.:format)
{:action=destroy, :controller=instructions}
Here's the call to render it:
%= link_to 'Delete', instruction, :confirm = 'Are you
sure?', :method = :delete %
This is all from the scaffolding created by Rails. Whenever
that
link
is clicked, it routes the user to the Edit page.
If I look at the logs, it looks like a GET request is made
instead of
a Delete.
Has anyone seen this before?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google
Groups
Ruby on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
--
-
visit my blog athttp://jimlabs.heroku.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Ruby on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
--
-
visit my blog athttp://jimlabs.heroku.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Ruby on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
--
-
visit my blog at http://jimlabs.heroku.com
--
-
visit my blog at http://jimlabs.heroku.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Counting items in associate with a limit
Rails 3 --- I have a relationship where Category has_and_belongs_to_many Article. I want to grab a small subsection of articles related to a particular category. When I try to iterate over these, Rails tries to count the records and gets the wrong number. The issue is that there is bug in the way ActiveRecord counts records in associations. For example: c = Category.first c.articles.count Outputs 8 which is correct. c.articles.limit(3).count Also outputs 8, when it should be 3 The problem is that the SQL ActiveRecord generates, just appends the limit to end of the SQL string: SELECT COUNT(*) AS count_id FROM `articles` INNER JOIN `articles_categories` ON `articles`.id = `articles_categories`.article_id WHERE (`articles_categories`.category_id = 9 ) LIMIT 3 All the limit statement does here is limit the number of output lines: which is always 1. If ActiveRecord generated this, it would work: SELECT count(*) FROM ( SELECT * FROM `articles` INNER JOIN `articles_categories` ON `articles`.id = `articles_categories`.article_id WHERE (`articles_categories`.category_id = 9 ) LIMIT 6, 4) inner_table To correct this I think I'd need to override ActiveRecord::Calculations#count. Is there a better way? If this was just a has_many relationship I could use: Article.where([category_id = ?, c.id]).limit(3).count but that won't work with a has_and_belongs_to_many because articles doesn't have a category_id field -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Decimal Columns Allow Defaults?
On Feb 10, 2011, at 1:54 PM, Karl Smith wrote: Is :default allowed as an option for decimal columns? A migration: class CreateMoney ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up create_table :money do |t| t.decimal :amount, :defaut = 0.0, :precision = 8, :scale = 2 end end def self.down drop_table :money end end Creates the following schema: create_table money, :force = true do |t| t.decimal amount, :precision = 8, :scale = 2 end What happened to the default, it's gone! Bug? or do decimal columns disallow the :default option? or is it because :precision/:scale are also set? defaut != default You've got a typo. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Delete routes to Edit?
It's a JS problem.
I am using a number of mapping libraries but I think the heart of the
problem is JQuery, looks like it conflicts with Prototype??
Thanks for your feedback!
On Feb 11, 9:26 am, Jim Ruther Nill jvn...@gmail.com wrote:
btw, see if you can figure something out on this
thread.http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=41563
http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=41563good luck!
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Jim Ruther Nill jvn...@gmail.com wrote:
hmm. that's weird. i can't think of any cause atm.
what js framework are you using?
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:15 AM, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope, I removed the confirm and it still goes to Edit.
On Feb 11, 9:10 am, Jim Ruther Nill jvn...@gmail.com wrote:
hmm, just to be sure, try removing the confirm argument and check if it
goes
to the destroy action.
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:05 AM, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hmm, I uncommented the CSRF meta tag, ensured I was including the
default javascripts and restarted, same issue.
I have added my own js files, is it likely a conflict with those?
On Feb 11, 9:01 am, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, and I did remove the CSRF meta tag.
Thanks, I'll look into it!
On Feb 11, 8:58 am, Jim Ruther Nill jvn...@gmail.com wrote:
are you using rails 3? this problem usually occur if you remove
the
javascripts to be used to handle the :confirm argument and the
csrf
meta
tag.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:46 PM, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi-
I encountered a problem I have never seen before. For some
reason,
requests for Destroy are routing to Edit.
Here's the route:
DELETE /instructions/:id(.:format)
{:action=destroy, :controller=instructions}
Here's the call to render it:
%= link_to 'Delete', instruction, :confirm = 'Are you
sure?', :method = :delete %
This is all from the scaffolding created by Rails. Whenever
that
link
is clicked, it routes the user to the Edit page.
If I look at the logs, it looks like a GET request is made
instead of
a Delete.
Has anyone seen this before?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google
Groups
Ruby on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
--
-
visit my blog athttp://jimlabs.heroku.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Ruby on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
--
-
visit my blog athttp://jimlabs.heroku.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Ruby on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
--
-
visit my blog athttp://jimlabs.heroku.com
--
-
visit my blog athttp://jimlabs.heroku.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: Delete routes to Edit?
On Feb 11, 2011, at 11:56 AM, pete wrote:
It's a JS problem.
I am using a number of mapping libraries but I think the heart of the
problem is JQuery, looks like it conflicts with Prototype??
Thanks for your feedback!
Have you replaced the rails.js with the one for jQuery?
https://github.com/rails/jquery-ujs
-Rob
On Feb 11, 9:26 am, Jim Ruther Nill jvn...@gmail.com wrote:
btw, see if you can figure something out on this
thread.http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=41563
http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=41563good luck!
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Jim Ruther Nill
jvn...@gmail.com wrote:
hmm. that's weird. i can't think of any cause atm.
what js framework are you using?
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:15 AM, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com
wrote:
Nope, I removed the confirm and it still goes to Edit.
On Feb 11, 9:10 am, Jim Ruther Nill jvn...@gmail.com wrote:
hmm, just to be sure, try removing the confirm argument and
check if it
goes
to the destroy action.
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:05 AM, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hmm, I uncommented the CSRF meta tag, ensured I was including the
default javascripts and restarted, same issue.
I have added my own js files, is it likely a conflict with those?
On Feb 11, 9:01 am, pete peterbattag...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, and I did remove the CSRF meta tag.
Thanks, I'll look into it!
On Feb 11, 8:58 am, Jim Ruther Nill jvn...@gmail.com wrote:
are you using rails 3? this problem usually occur if you remove
the
javascripts to be used to handle the :confirm argument and the
csrf
meta
tag.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:46 PM, pete
peterbattag...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi-
I encountered a problem I have never seen before. For some
reason,
requests for Destroy are routing to Edit.
Here's the route:
DELETE /instructions/:id(.:format)
{:action=destroy, :controller=instructions}
Here's the call to render it:
%= link_to 'Delete', instruction, :confirm = 'Are you
sure?', :method = :delete %
This is all from the scaffolding created by Rails. Whenever
that
link
is clicked, it routes the user to the Edit page.
If I look at the logs, it looks like a GET request is made
instead of
a Delete.
Has anyone seen this before?
Rob Biedenharn
r...@agileconsultingllc.com http://AgileConsultingLLC.com/
r...@gaslightsoftware.com http://GaslightSoftware.com/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on
Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Rails 3 working with and SSL
I have a Rails 3 app using Ruby 1.9.2 configured to work on the Linux server. The uses SSL to access all there resources. Now, I am dealing with the SSL so that I can display the application on the client side. The user LDAP credentials are being passed to the Linux server through instructions in the httpd.conf file. I can see the handshake in the SSL_error logs. I also know the cert information is being passed because I can see the information in the SSL_client logs and also in the Rails WEBrick server console as my application boots (http://www.nearinfinity.com/blogs/chris_rohr/configuring_webrick_to_use_ssl.html). However when I go to the Https port on my desktop I get the browser error 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable. I know the cert was passed to the browser because I get the lock icon. Can someone help me understand the 503 error? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Rails 3 working with webrick and SSL
If I recall correctly, webrick doesn't support SSL. Mongrel neither. You'll have to use Apache or Nginx for that. Yes, SSL dev for Rails is a bit painful. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: understanding rails project
Michael Pavling wrote in post #980954: (Partial, I assume). Yes, a little searching... but the context-sensitive control-clicking in my IDE lets me follow through very quickly, and I generally try to name stuff to be simple to find again (the self-documenting approach) Yes, you're right, partial In my IDE (RubyMine) some partial can't be reached by clicking, i assumed that if the good IDE can't do this job so another IDE's do worse job. I think that self-documented approach helps read the code locally, but to build the mind-image of the project is reading whole code many times. That's why the diagram tools were built, to help to create image of the project in mind. But all visual tools which I used are based on structure approach, no actions view. I think the action is very similar to goal, when I do the action it means I want to do something specifically: add new comment, create new account and etc. If I can see which controller, model, view are using now and where it comes from, while the current action is operating, then it helps me to understand the project. I don't know what you mean for sure. What place? Do you mean controller action? If so, I look at the URL... and I can open any file by name with a couple of key-presses. The place where is user click the action. In my example the comment views composed in another view, so this is not easy to find out what's going on. That's great to hear. I hope it works well for you. I'm all for people working in whatever way is best for them. For me; it's not so much help to have the controller/view drawing. But if the time it takes to build is off-sets in time you save from your previous searching, then it's a win. But I would say that if others can find it quicker and easier while not using the drawing, then maybe the problem you're fixing with the diagram isn't the biggest win you could achieve? Actually I tried to describe one thing which have two sides and you separated it in two things. And you might be right, if Im not so good at Rails technology, it doesn't mean that others have the same problems. I think these difficulties appear only when we're reading the new someone else's project, not the our own project. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Real-time web traffic alert notifications (email or SMS) on the cheap?
I'm a big fan of New Relic. One of the services they provide is alerts when your traffic goes up unexpectedly above a predetermined level. Does anyone have a favorite, inexpensive traffic alert tool that can be used on a small site--a site that's not yet big enough for monthly payments of $150 for New Relic Silver (or even the $36 price tag for New Relic Silver on Heroku). Maybe a nice little does-just-one-thing-well tool that's $2-3/month or something. The closest I've found are Clicky and Chartbeat, both of which seem to have real-time alerts for just under $10 a month. That's not bad, but it's more than $2 or $3. A server-side tool in Ruby would be preferable to a client-side tool in JavaScript. Because a server-side tool would also track API traffic. I know Google Analytics sends email alerts but they're daily. I'm thinking more of a you've been slashdotted kind of thing where you can know in a few minutes. Thanks! And if no one knows about one maybe I'll write one myself. Brian -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Complex Active_record associations
So I have 3 models - Users, Roles, Records. For each record X user, can have 1 of 3 roles, and those roles will give different permissions on each record. So for example, user 1 - has a role of follower on record 5, also user 1 - is a manager(role) of record 4, etc. So what I am trying to do, is figure out how to create that situation. Would something like this work? User has_and_belongs_to roles has_many records through = role_record user_status -- table user_id status_id roles has_and_Belongs_to Users has_and_belongs_to records role_record -- table role_id record_id (user_id) records has_and_belongs_to roles The final goal is I want to call - user(1).role(1) - and have it spit out all the associated records that I have. I have n amount of users and records, but currently only 3 roles. Thanks for the help! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: rvm install 1.8.7 prompts There has been an error while running make. Halting the installation.
On Feb 11, 3:36 pm, John Merlino li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: Frederick Cheung wrote in post #980922: Error running 'make ', please read /Users/jmerlino/.rvm/log/ruby-1.8.7-p330/make.log So, what was in it? Fred Towards bottom it says this: readline.c: In function ‘username_completion_proc_call’: readline.c:730: error: ‘username_completion_function’ undeclared (first use in this function) readline.c:730: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once readline.c:730: error: for each function it appears in.) make[1]: *** [readline.o] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 1 Well it's clearly a readline based problem - did you try passing -- with-readline-dir=$rvm_path/usr as you did when building 1.9.2 ? Fred -- Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Regex for string first chars - Model validation
Hello everyone, in my Rails app I need to validate a string that on creation can not have its first chars empty or composed by any special chars. For example: file and %file aren't valid. Do you know what Regex I should use? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Regex for string first chars - Model validation
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Rodrigo Alves Vieira rodrig...@gmail.comwrote: Hello everyone, in my Rails app I need to validate a string that on creation can not have its first chars empty or composed by any special chars. For example: file and %file aren't valid. Do you know what Regex I should use? You could utilize the anchor for this -- that is you say that the line must begin with the characters that match the following regex. Something like: /\A[\w]+$/ would work. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Regex for string first chars - Model validation
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Rodrigo Alves Vieira rodrig...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, in my Rails app I need to validate a string that on creation can not have its first chars empty or composed by any special chars. For example: file and %file aren't valid. Do you know what Regex I should use? You could utilize the anchor for this -- that is you say that the line must begin with the characters that match the following regex. Something like: /\A[\w]+$/ would work. Note that \w will match an underscore. Don't know if you consider that special or not... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Regex for string first chars - Model validation
Hello, thanks for the reply, but after applying this regex I go to rails console and run a = File.new a.file_name = example.txt It still works, when it shouldn't... any more help? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Regex for string first chars - Model validation
Undescore is allowed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Regex for string first chars - Model validation
Underscore is allowed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: can you portably store infinity via AR?
Where it stands: Infinity can be represented in IEEE floating point numbers. Infinity can be represented in Ruby, as evidenced by (1.0/0.0).infinite? = 1 Infinity can be represented in sqlite (and probably other databases): sqlite select * from test_recs; 1|Inf| Yet it appears that there's no portable way to store a Ruby infinity in a database using AR. Does anyone disagree? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] rails 3 initialize module, running cucumber
I have this in my environment file, I get The error occurred while evaluating nil.[] (NoMethodError) on the S3Config.key= line when running cucumber. Why is it not loading up the module when running cucumber? module S3Config mattr_accessor :key mattr_accessor :sec end class ActiveRecord::Base include S3Config extend DynamicMethods end S3Config.key = AppConfig['access_key_id'] S3Config.sec = AppConfig['secret_access_key'] ActionMailer::Base.default_url_options[:host]=AppConfig['base_url'] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] An hash of arrays, how to use?
Hello everybody!
I have a problem with an Hash of Arrays.
ruby-1.9.2-p136 :001 x = Hash.new Array.new
= {}
ruby-1.9.2-p136 :002 x[test] test
= [test]
ruby-1.9.2-p136 :003 x
= {}
ruby-1.9.2-p136 :004 x.keys
= []
ruby-1.9.2-p136 :005 x[test]
= [test]
ruby-1.9.2-p136 :006
Why is keys empty?
What I am trying to do is build a hash of arrays from an XML file:
b = Hash.new(Array.new)
h = XmlSimple.xml_in self.raw
h[data][0][bank][0][item].each do |item|
b[item[cat]] item[name]
end
This is the code, but b has like the test in irb no keys, or seems to
be empty, unless you dont know the key i advance, but that is
impossible, since the item[cat] is dynamic and it is known of 10
categories at the moment, but it is also known that the number of
categories will go up in the future, so I want to do it future-proof
already today :D
Thank you in Advance
Norbert
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Real-time web traffic alert notifications (email or SMS) on the cheap?
for a cheap simple monitor tool for a site that is up or down - http://monitor.rootinternet.co.uk/en/index.php On Feb 11, 10:53 am, Brian Morearty li...@ruby-forum.com wrote: I'm a big fan of New Relic. One of the services they provide is alerts when your traffic goes up unexpectedly above a predetermined level. Does anyone have a favorite, inexpensive traffic alert tool that can be used on a small site--a site that's not yet big enough for monthly payments of $150 for New Relic Silver (or even the $36 price tag for New Relic Silver on Heroku). Maybe a nice little does-just-one-thing-well tool that's $2-3/month or something. The closest I've found are Clicky and Chartbeat, both of which seem to have real-time alerts for just under $10 a month. That's not bad, but it's more than $2 or $3. A server-side tool in Ruby would be preferable to a client-side tool in JavaScript. Because a server-side tool would also track API traffic. I know Google Analytics sends email alerts but they're daily. I'm thinking more of a you've been slashdotted kind of thing where you can know in a few minutes. Thanks! And if no one knows about one maybe I'll write one myself. Brian -- Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: An hash of arrays, how to use?
On Feb 11, 9:09 pm, Norbert Melzer timmel...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello everybody!
I have a problem with an Hash of Arrays.
ruby-1.9.2-p136 :001 x = Hash.new Array.new
= {}
ruby-1.9.2-p136 :002 x[test] test
= [test]
ruby-1.9.2-p136 :003 x
= {}
ruby-1.9.2-p136 :004 x.keys
= []
ruby-1.9.2-p136 :005 x[test]
= [test]
ruby-1.9.2-p136 :006
Why is keys empty?
because you've never actually done x[test]= ...
(all you're doing is modifying the hash's default value)
Fred
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] Re: Regex for string first chars - Model validation
Philip's idea seems pretty good: ^\w+ That says: look for any string that starts with one or more word characters (letters, numbers, underscores). Try it out in rubular: http://rubular.com/ It let's you quickly experiment with lots of regular expressions and has a quick-ref right there on the page. On Feb 11, 11:58 am, Rodrigo Alves Vieira rodrig...@gmail.com wrote: Underscore is allowed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] is equal operator to check current user is owner
I'm want to restrict access to an object show action to the owner
in my action I have this
def show
@thing = Thing.find(params[:id])
if current_user @thing.owner == current_user
respond_to do |format|
format.json { render :json = @thing }
end
else
render :status = :forbidden, :text = API requires
authentication for the minute.
end
end
Which works in the browser, however when running functional tests even
though @thing.owner is the same user as current_user it is not the
same object so the comparison fails as I see it I have a few options
but wanted to try and gauge what people feel is the best way
1) adjust the test setup so the logged in user is the same object and
the comparison returns true (I have no idea how I would go about doing
this)
2) just do current_user.id == @thing.owner.id, this seems like the
most obvious and easiest but somehow less elegant
3) write my own comparison method on my user class, either:
def is_equal_to user(user)
return user.id == self.id
end
or:
def is_current_user
return current_user.id == self.id
end
4) something else I haven't thought about
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: An hash of arrays, how to use?
2011/2/11 Frederick Cheung frederick.che...@gmail.com: On Feb 11, 9:09 pm, Norbert Melzer timmel...@googlemail.com wrote: Why is keys empty? because you've never actually done x[test]= ... (all you're doing is modifying the hash's default value) OK, now I tried the following b = Hash.new(Array.new) h = XmlSimple.xml_in self.raw h[data][0][bank][0][item].each do |item| if b.key? item[cat] b[item[cat]] = item else b[item[cat]] item end end pp b.keys but b.keys is still empty... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] Re: An hash of arrays, how to use?
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Norbert Melzer
timmel...@googlemail.com wrote:
OK, now I tried the following
b = Hash.new(Array.new)
h = XmlSimple.xml_in self.raw
h[data][0][bank][0][item].each do |item|
delete line if b.key? item[cat]
add line if !b.key? item[cat]
b[item[cat]] = item
else
b[item[cat]] item
end
end
pp b.keys
call me stupid... But with above marked change it works as I want it
to behave :D
try this,
b = Hash.new {|h,k| h[k]=[]}
h = XmlSimple.xml_in self.raw
h[data][0][bank][0][item].each do |item|
b[item[cat]] item
end
best regards -botp
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby
on Rails: Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
[Rails] DRY in rspec tests
Hi, I've got a lot of rspec controller tests. At the beginning of each controller, I have: def authenticate ... end def logout ... end Authenticates creates me a @current_user, logout destroys the @current_user. As I said, this code is at the beginning of each controller, not very DRY :-) Any hints for me, where to put this code and how to integrate it in my tests, to not always rewrite this two methods? Regards sewid -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
Re: [Rails] DRY in rspec tests
I've got a lot of rspec controller tests. At the beginning of each controller, I have: def authenticate ... end def logout ... end Authenticates creates me a @current_user, logout destroys the @current_user. As I said, this code is at the beginning of each controller, not very DRY :-) Any hints for me, where to put this code and how to integrate it in my tests, to not always rewrite this two methods? You could create a file in spec/support/current_user.rb (or whatever, doesn't matter as long as it's in spec/support/*.rb) and put them in there. Then they'll be available to all your specs... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Talk group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
